War on Terror

Liberty, Fraternity, Security

After ISIS attacks, France follows in America's footsteps on targeting civil liberties.


What should we do about terrorism?

After the attacks on Paris, the French government passed a law that allows anyone suspected of being a security threat to be placed under house arrest and searches to be conducted without warrants.

Reason's Anthony Fisher reports that this can lead to nasty experiences for anyone who associates with people from the Middle East.

A Halal-Mexican restaurant near Paris "was raided by upwards of forty police armed with rifles and clad in body armor, helmets, and riot shields. After terrifying diners, who were ordered to sit still and not touch their phones, officers proceeded to the basement, where they smashed several doors with battering rams, reportedly in search of a 'hidden prayer room.'"

The restaurant owner asked them not to break down doors because he would simply unlock them, but he was ordered to "lay on the floor and stay silent." The raid did not find weapons or anything "linked to terrorist activities."

France also decided that it now has a right to copy data from anyone government deems of interest. By "anyone," though, the politicians didn't mean politicians. They exempted themselves—and journalists, lawyers and diplomats. Insiders protect their own. Of course, this will inspire terrorists to pose as—or become—politicians, journalists, lawyers and diplomats.

France also claims the right to control TV, radio and theater content that might incite violence. France has long had "hate speech" laws that make it a crime to encourage hatred against a specific minority. Actress and animal-rights activist Brigitte Bardot was fined $23,000 for "provoking racial hatred" after she criticized Muslims for being cruel to sheep.Somehow this hasn't stopped hatred or terrorism in France. More likely, it drives hate underground and chills speech that might eventually resolve differences.

In the U.S., despite Attorney General Loretta Lynch's ambiguous and poorly timed comments the day after the San Bernardino attack about the need to punish anti-Muslim hate speech, it remains legal to say hateful things so long as you do not incite imminent violence, such as by telling a crowd, "Go kill that guy." Good.

Politicians' tendency when people are scared is to keep expanding government. The Department of Homeland Security is now nearly twice the size it was when it was created in the immediate aftermath of 9/11.

Panic can cause bad spending and management decisions even in our private lives, but the problem is far worse in government, where it's other people's money being spent. Almost any waste can be justified by calling it necessary for "national security."

Homeland Security spent billions on grants to tiny local police departments to help them purchase military equipment and vehicles—and put covert listening devices in public places.

The agency also assigns itself tasks that appear to have little or nothing to do with what most people consider "homeland security."

An elderly man in a theater in Columbus, Ohio, was subjected to a terrifying hour-long interrogation by a DHS official because he wore Google Glass and the theater thought he might be illegally taping the film. They didn't believe him when he explained that the glasses were prescription glasses.

The man told the Gadgeteer, "a guy comes near my seat, shoves a badge that had some sort of a shield on it, yanks the Google Glass off my face and says, 'Follow me outside immediately.'" After an hour, they let the man go.

It turns out DHS considers fighting movie piracy to be part of its responsibility. DHS agents also investigate pickpocketing, expose counterfeit NBA merchandise and teach nightclub strippers about sex-traffickers. Meanwhile, the TSA confiscates shampoo and tweezers but fails test after test using dummy bombs smuggled through airport security.

Your tax dollars at work. Yet now, after the latest terror attacks, Republicans and Democrats both claim Homeland Security still needs more money.

Keeping Americans safe from terrorism is an important, basic function of government. But government doesn't stick to its basic functions.

Terrorists are a real threat. So is government with a blank check.


NEXT: Authorities Raid Home of Possible Bitcoin Founder

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. WHAT’S THE BUDGETING, KENNETH? It’s after midnight, Surely one of you beggars can take a minute to post the final tally! This lapse is going in your record.

  2. Terrorists are a real threat. So is government with a blank check.

    Terrorists have killed their thousands, government their millions.

    In fact, without government disarming their “citizens”, the terrorists would have killed thousands fewer. Then again, the more the terrorists kill, the more power the government gets. I’m not saying that there is some sort of conspiracy between the two groups, but that the terrorists are more “useful idiots” helping the government get what it really wants.

  3. Actress and animal-rights activist Brigitte Bardot was fined $23,000 for “provoking racial hatred” after she criticized Muslims for being cruel to sheep.

    I’m sure that most members of ISIS/Daesh are very kind to sheep. After their fashion.

    1. Kind, from behind.

      1. How many sheep does you compound keep, Suicided?
        Overall count. Not just the number you’ve buggered while shooting your favorite pistol in the air.

  4. France is escalating its war against speech and religion. They are going down the same path they’ve followed many times in the last few centuries and the results will be disastrous as usual unless they wake up. I like how the media acts like they are ‘following us’ when in fact the real danger is us following them. Which is what Trump is trying to do but will fail. But hey at least we can pat Europe on the back for restricting free speech for the benefit of ‘civilization’ and then watch as the radicals pop out and get squashed – a game of real life whack-a-mole.

  5. In the face of criminal attack, “boobus bureaucrtus” seems always to attack the civil rights of those who give no offense, who commit no crimes, while paying scant to no attention to the source of the problem. Why is this,one wonders..

  6. Our government did the same thing in Boston after the Boston Marathon bombing. Police broke down the doors of homes, entered and searched them without warrants. The shut down Boston for almost a week and Marshal Law was never declared. Before that there was the Waco massacre by the FBI and ATF where they murdered entire families in the 1990s. There are plenty more examples through history.

    “Government is evil.” Thomas Paine.

  7. The only question I have is did the govt. let it happen or make it happen?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.