Donald Trump Releases His Inner Fascist, Hostage Situation in Mali Ends with 27 Dead: P.M. Links

-
Todd Kranin Donald Trump would like to implement a national registry for Muslim Americans. You know who else was fond of national registries for religious minorities…
- Or maybe not.
- Ben Carson isn't looking too good, either.
- Shooting and hostage situation in Mali hotel leaves 27 dead.
- The New York Times review of The Hunger Games: Mockingjay, Part 2 makes reference to Katniss's gender as "fluid," which is staggeringly incorrect.
- The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum has condemned anti-refugee sentiments.
The Misleading Video Interview With a Rapist at the Heart of the Campus Sexual Assault Freakout: How influential sexual assault expert David Lisak used a misleadingly edited video to sell his serial predator theory of campus rape. By Linda M. LeFauve
Refugees and the Risk of 'Sleeper' Terrorists: Grandstanding politicians fan fear, but don't know what they are talking about. By Ronald Bailey
Ditch the Fake Lovefest and Learn the Real Story of the First Thanksgiving: Saints & Strangers plays out the tense political negotiations. By Glenn Garvin
The Star Wars Economy Is Bigger Than You Think: How the franchise changed the way movies make money. By Paul Detrick
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum has condemned anti-refugee sentiments.
Well, it better.
Hello.
Hello Rufus. So, are we gonna be sweater buddies, as all good Canadians should?
Jesus Christ.
I was wondering when that was going to happen.
No cult of the personality here!
I'm making $86 an hour working from home. I was shocked when my neighbour told me she was averaging $95 but I see how it works now.I feel so much freedom now that I'm my own boss.go to this site home tab for more detai....
http://www.4cyberworks.com
WTF?
The life-size cardboard cut-outs of Obama were a brilliant way to part fools from their money. This? This? I have no words.
Now you understand, Americans. There is nothing you can do that we cannot take and make shittier.
I want one.
Is it supporting Syrian refugees going to Israel, it is next door.
Tear down those walls Israel, let the refugees in!
+1 Right Of Return
A nuanced statement against lazy collectivist bigotry? I blame the Jews.
Who let the dogs...in?
When will they condemn FDR for refusing entry of German Jewish refugees? Or will they piss away their energy on Trump, even though he has had, and will have, no impact whatsoever on refugees?
I'll hold my breath.
Even the Light Bringer suspended Iraqi immigrantion for a 6 month period with no media outcry.
Donald Trump would like to implement a national registry for Muslim Americans.
The first step to confiscation.
Geez, and mine has one of those shoulder things that goes up. Better bury it in the backyard...
Well, I would hope your muslim's shoulders go up. Rotator cuff injuries are a bitch.
Maybe he's just concerned we'll all buy them the same toaster as a gift.
Somebody help suggest me a good science-y Christmas/Hanukkah present for my 6 year old. I'm thinking of a microscope and slides (to go along with the dolls and books and Wii U games), because I got that when I was around that age and it was awesome.
Some sort of rock/mineral set? I used to love that stuff when I was that age.
Damn it Rhywun, they're minera... oh, nevermind.
Every boy wants a BB gun.
+1 Red Ryder
The Golden Book of Chemistry Experiments or possibly 50 Dangerous Things (You Should Let Your Children Do)
Spoiler: my brother-in-law did not let my nephew do most of these things
Get her a little beginner chemistry set! My sister got one when I was 6 and she never used it... guess who did instead?
Celestron makes a digital microscope that's pretty decent (about $40 on amazon)--they connect to a computer via USB and are reasonably easy to use for kids and work well for looking at bugs, rocks, etc. More of a high-powered magnifying glass, but easier than working with slides.
Snap circuits are also a cool toy, but might be a little too old unless the kid is really focused. Mine didn't get into them until about age 8-9.
^These.
My daughter loved pokemon cards at 6 last year. Even though she wasn't playing with them, her imagination made them a great entertainment
Bomb the Harbor!
Mini bike.
bb gun?
/you'll shoot your eye out
My grandpa bought me and my cousins mini bikes for Christmas when we were 5. Pretty sweet.
Galileoscope
Its a cheap telescope similar in size to the one Galileo used.
Supposed to be pretty easy to take it apart and put it together to see how it works.
Snap Circuits
If you'd like a book try Backyard Ballistics
That sounds pretty good. A lot of the little science kits for kids you can buy at museums etc. are junk. But I still remember my microscope and slides.
I also got my boy a paper airplane kit at that age, it had like 40 designs.
I know they make little magnet kits for kids to learn about magnetic fields. Could throw in a basic silva compass with that.
Saliva compass?
Stereo-microscope, then start catching bugs.
Amazon has got a bazillion of them.
K'nex - my kids loved them, and the spouse loved playing with them. You can ramp-up to electronics/engines, so good for years.
Anarchist Cookbook (pay cash for it) and a chemistry set.
Anarchist Cookbook (pay cash for it)
Why bother? He already posts here.
The Elenco Snap Circuits are pretty good for kids too - let's 'em build working electronics with less risk from soldering (though I imagine a kid that really digs it will be soldering soon!).
6 year olds love stickers.
Two words.
Model. Rocket.
Snap circuits
Whoosh Boom Splat?
Everything she needs to know about science is in the Bible.
You're thinking of sex.
We use Snap Circuits in our education and outreach. Might be a bit much for 6 years old, but depends on your kid.
http://www.snapcircuits.net/
I also got this telescope for our friend's kid, and it's good enough to see the rings of Saturn and some cool features on the Moon, which are the only things that will really interest most kids that age.
Yeah, it depends on attention span.
There's a circuit set with motors that buttons together.
http://www.amazon.com/Snap-Cir.....B00CIXVIRQ
My niece is five I just bought her this for her holiday gift. This is the third year in a row (she has the wolf and the frog). At some point, she can take all of them apart, mix up the pieces and then try to put all three back together.
http://www.therealmothergoose......_moose.htm
Microscope! Microscope! Microscope!
*jumps up and down waving arms*
A 'grievance journal'
A nice brewing set up. Cover a lot of organic chemistry that way.
Either a microscope or a telescope. It's hard to get good ones without spending some dough though.
"You know who else .."
Nice:)
It is known that Robby reads the comments, the poor bastard.
One of us, one of us....
The New York Times review of The Hunger Games: Mockingjay, Part 2 makes reference to Katniss's gender as "fluid," which is staggeringly incorrect.
Women can't be heroes unless they're really being men? I have no idea where you'd come up with genderfluid to talk about Katniss.
It's a trendy word. I mean, she isn't always wearing a dress, and she was somewhat uncomfortable getting all dolled up before the Games. That makes her genderfluid, right? (that isn't actually a question)
I only sometimes wear flannel button-ups. I must be genderfluid too.
Do you drive a Subaru Forrester?
This is his car, all right.
http://s106.photobucket.com/us.....8.jpg.html
Do you drive a Subaru Forrester
Being genderfluid doesn't make me a lesbian, Ted.
I don't think.
Shit.
Do you drive a Subaru Forrester?
Yeah. I'm thinking of getting truck balls for it.
....
I sort of regret the purchase, but it was affordable.
Flannel button-ups?
Who do you think you are, Paul Bunyan?
Doesn't every good, red-blooded American male think he's Paul Bunyan from time to time?
I'm more of the John Henry type. I'm gonna die drilling against a machine and winning.
Some days, FdA, but some days I'm more of a Lucette
Her desire is as fluid as her gender, whether she's slipping into froufrou, shooting down enemy aircraft, kissing a boy or taking a punch.
Only men can shoot down enemy aircraft. duh.
Is that in English?
I know absolutely nothing about this franchise. Crap or not crap? The "review" was tedious twaddle and TL;DR besides.
The third book is the weakest, but it's a very good series overall, with some pretty good libertarian, or at least anti-authoritarian, leanings. The movies aren't quite so great to watch unless you know the books.
I watch the films to look at Lawrence.
Made for twelve year olds. Haven't seen much of it myself. Not being 12.
Yeah, what little I glean from the commercials gives it a distinctly "Twilight" vibe which is, uh, somewhat off-putting.
HG has more action, a relatable female protagonist, and a less annoying romantic love triangle.
Much better than Twilight but nothing spectacular.
Does it have sparkly vampires? If not, pass.
Here you go.
It's pretty much crap but it's crap with a libertarian tilt, so it gets a thumbs up from me. Plus Jennifer Lawrence is adorable!
I really like Jennifer Lawrence
It's good vacation reading. The first book was particularly good. The second felt like a waste of time and the third wrapped the plot up nicely, but wasn't amazing.
I only saw the last movie that came out because my boyfriend at the time bought tickets over my objection. I'm so fucking sick of the habit of splitting the last book in a series into 18 movies. The movies have been reasonably good action films.
+1 I refuse to watch any movies that do this.
As action films I'd say they are pretty average.
Dialogue is often kind of silly. I'd say Woody Harrelson has all the best lines and is my favorite character as the only one who really gets it.
The anti-authoritarian them of the movies will scratch your 'tree of liberty must be refreshed' button.
The books started off alright, but went downhill in each successive book.
The movies are much less crappy than the books, where the high production values and A-list actors distract you from the illogical plot and you mostly don't have to deal with the tweener novel prose quality. Still, they're definitely chick flicks -- in a dystopian world gone mad, which of the two hunks (both of whom -- it goes without saying -- are desperately in love with her) will our heroine choose? And what killer subversive outfits will our revolutionary fashionista wear for her public appearances? The fate of the world may hang in the balance!
Maybe they were trying to say that boys could also aspire to be Katniss-type heroes?
Spoiler: The real Katniss was actually killed in between the first and second movie and replaced with a T-1000.
The latest in a growing body of evidence that the newest wave of feminists and gender studies peeps are more interested in reifying traditional masculine and feminine roles, forcing all actual humans to be some nonbinary gender. Fuck this shit.
nonbinary gender
dibs on the band name
they are trying to teach people to beleive what they are told and not their lying eyes.
Really, that is what they are doing.
""the newest wave of feminists and gender studies peeps are more interested in reifying traditional masculine and feminine roles, forcing all actual humans to be some nonbinary gender.""
"re?i?fy
?r???f?/
verbformal
gerund or present participle: reifying
make (something abstract) more concrete or real.""
Are you sure that's the word you meant?
So technically is this post-third wave?
The comments are worse than the review. Particularly the NYT picks among the comments.
Number one says that it is great that there's female leads and all, but the movie is a failure because none of the lead characters is of color.
Not only did the commenter bother to write something so stupid, but the NYT decided to highlight this opinion. No movie can be made that satisfies the PC police. It must be a black female lead played by a woman who identifies as male but can play female in the movies.... etc.
Worse, the reviewer and many of the commenters (including the insipid commenter reference above) seem to think that "Hunger Games" breaks new ground by having a strong female lead in an action movie.
One comment even referenced a long list of prior art in the area, particularly Sigourney Weaver in Aliens. A supposition that was roundly rejected by the commentariat. I'm sure Katherine Hepburn would be surprised to learn that she never played a strong female lead that was both tough and feminine and escaped the "whore/virgin dichotomy". (yes, the reviewer actually went there.)
Here's a hint to columnists: If your "great breakthrough for the progressive cause" has prior art that dates back to before your parents met, it ain't a great breakthrough.
Ben Carson isn't looking too good, either.
Trump and Carson need to make way for the more serious candidates. Like "come at me bro" Cruz.
How the franchise changed the way movies make money.
It's all due to the level of merchandising-chlorian levels in Lucas' blood.
I see what you did there.
Thanks for not inflicting Trump's massive pie-hole on us again.
You know who else was fond of national registries for religious minorities...
The IRS?
Caesar?
Yep.
The Mormons?
I'm a huge fan of the Mormons' Family Library. Makes research a hell of a lot easier.
The New York Times review of The Hunger Games: Mockingjay, Part 2 makes reference to Katniss's gender as "fluid," which is staggeringly incorrect.
Maybe she's as meat popsicle.
...gender as "fluid," which is staggeringly incorrect.
Incorrect? I'm sorry, but some of us are, in fact, okay with the idea of gender-fluidity. Your kind of bigotry has no place in PM Links, Soave.
The only thing NOT fluid about fist is his perfect BMI.
That 21.5 is the God particle of BMI science.
I thought that was his perfect BMs
How are his IVs?
My BMs have been fluid quite a bit.
Try fiber
Get some of those probiotic pills that have all those bacteria thingys.
Worked for me over night.
Soave is a Hunger Games expert, man!
Shooting and hostage situation in Mali hotel leaves 27 dead.
I bet this had nothing to do with [redacted].
Gender fluidity?
Jennifer Lawrence?
Hitler?
Climate change. Duh.
Methodists?
Pre-Black Friday Sales?
Man called Phuc Dat Bich posts passport to Facebook after being repeatedly banned from site
He hails from the village of Dun Binh Phukt.
Refugees bolster economy, says researcher
Welp, I guess science is settled.
Future Krugman Fellowship Award for Study of Pump-Priming winner?
And don't you dare tell me "fellowship award" is redundant - I heard it from Vincent Adultman himself.
The "Broken World" theory of economics.
Explains a lot.
Spending money bolsters the economy. Right. So why not hit up the casino?
What a stupid bitch.
So- what are my gender options?
Fluid vs solid?
Brooks, you're more gaseous.
plasma
Ice nine.
So exclusionary. Gendergasseous and genderBose?Einstein condensate will be miffed by your othering.
Fermi-Dirac or go home.
Amorphous
"Carson is so clueless," said an Iowa GOP insider. "He thinks the Kurds are a special kind of Wisconsin cheese."
Contest! Carson is so clueless ...
He thinks Parliament is a special kind of British cigarette.
He thinks Mali is a special kind of drug from Timbuktu.
He thinks Trix aren't for kids.
I thought everyone thought that except for Jared Fogle? Oh, and Old Man with Candy.
...he thinks country fried steak was fried in a country called Greece...
When his momma cuts herself, gravy come out.
Again with the pants shitting about Fascism in the USA.
Tom Wolfe
Look, I'm sure THIS VERY MINUTE a bunch of rednecks are shooting up a mosque while screaming Deus Vult!
Sheeit and Gawddam, is that how you spell it? We ben lookin on the intertube thang fer th' address of a musk.
Somewhere in this country right now, someone is smearing poo as a way of oppressing nonwhites.
After a contentious week, here's something we can all enjoy: Freya Mavor, whose new movie is 95 minutes of her as a mentally unstable, French, redhead sexpot. Trailer.
I love Gingers as much as I love Mexicans. Are there any Mexican Gingers?
Louis C.K.
There's a surprising number of them, yes.
The one I dated was just as crazy as you'd expect.
Be careful, because gingers are also especially prone to become jihadis.
Canelo Alvarez
United States now a failed state.
Tim Hortons shutters restaurants in New York, Maine
I can't even. Why would any refugess want to come to such a hellhole?
RC said something earlier today on the Rand Paul Immigration thread that I think bears repeating: [paraphrased] While restricting immigration may not be the most pure libertarian policy it will prevent the inevitable erosion of domestic civil liberties should the immigrants commit acts of terrorism.
That sort of compromise is not the sort of thing which most libertarians are comfortable with, but as I have often said we're not going to achieve libertopia overnight; we must compromise and be willing to achieve our goals over time.
Compromise? What is that?
Perhaps instead of compromising, we could just provide the yokels with some Depends?
"While restricting immigration may not be the most pure libertarian policy it will prevent the inevitable erosion of domestic civil liberties should the immigrants commit acts of terrorism."
Restricting immigration will not reduce terrorism. Only terminating terrorist groups and their state sponsors will do that.
Religion of peace.
Has it been confirmed that it wasn't the Amish?
Damn, we need more of that here.
A Woman's Body May Incorporate DNA From The Semen Of Casual Sex Partners
No roosh please.
I dunno, their Tom Sawyer was a pretty good song.
Well if he's banned in Canada he can't be all bad, but still.
That's why experts recommend only formal sex.
Damn you, I clicked it and read it before realizing who it was by
HAHAHA, He got you!
Any old-school Slashdot reader learned to scan every URL without clicking.
+1 tub girl
I'm not clicking that link. It's another PUA site, right?
No.
Woul you say they are... Absorbing our essence, Mandrake?
So women are like the monster from "The Thing"?
Hey Johnny, I love these posts. I love the responses here even more.
Yes, it may incorporate it into an egg. Thanks for explaining sexual reproduction.
While restricting immigration may not be the most pure libertarian policy it will prevent the inevitable erosion of domestic civil liberties should the immigrants commit acts of terrorism.
It seems to me collective precautionary-principle exclusion is a pretty flagrant violation of some sort of liberty.
It is indeed, Brooksie, and I acknowledged that it would be a compromise of principle. I think what he was getting at was that it was better to compromise the rights of prospective immigrants (ie, people not already in the US, people who are not US citizens) than to compromise the rights of US citizens.
Also, threading.
Just trying to look more than one move ahead, is all.
Bring in thousands and thousands of vettable refugees, as part of a migrant movement that we know for a fact* is being used to insert terrorists into Western nations. The odds are terrorists will infiltrate the US this way, and once here, they will likely commit terrorism. The smart be is that doing what the "import refugees" crowd wants to do will result in at least one "refugee" committing a terrorist attack.
What do you think the response to that will be? More police state, or more liberty?
*We know this because terrorists have already been caught using the migrant stream to move around.
Blast it. Should be "thousands of inadequately vettable refugees"
OT: Bernie Sanders explains Democratic Socialism.
Sanders dispatches a small army of strawmen to explain the need for Democratic Socialism and asserts that DS is the solution to all our pressing problems--real or imagined. The ghost of FDR haunts Sander's ideology and it is FDR's Second Bill of Rights that forms the foundation for Sander's philosophy.
Ultimately, we all have rights to everything we need and it is government that will supply them. In Bernie's world there are no mitigating factors and no limitations. And government always succeeds. Every need is a right and should be financed by the 1% because they have all the wealth. None of the "middle class" is responsible for their their own needs and wants which must be supplied by those more successful.
Democratic Socialism is ultimately socialistic populism and Bernie appeals to the fears of the needy and wanty.
I haven't finished listening to Sanders' speech, but he seemed to be basing his arguments not on the needs of the middle class, but on the very poor. That doesn't resonate with libertarians, but does seem to resonate with a larger number of people than there are libertarians.
You're right that he complains mostly about the needs of the very poor. However, he ties everything back to the "middle class," possibly because they have the most votes.
Plus a lot of poor people don't consider themselves poor, or at least on the way to becoming middle class someday. Even the kid flipping burgers for minimum wage may just be working their way through school.
The "social safety net" is very seductive to a large swath of the population, because job security is not something that exists like it used to. Lots of people have been "downsized" over the course of their career, a situation where even being a valuable, hardworking employee doesn't save you. Even if you push a pencil and don't swing a hammer.
It used to be that the unions filled this gap for short term layoffs. But that situation is much less common than it used to be. So people feel the immediacy of needing assistance in a way that they haven't in many decades, even if they currently are doing pretty well.
Progressives exploit this fear to their advantage.
"The ghost of FDR haunts Sander's ideology..."
I know I left that proton pack around here somewhere...
Here you go, motherfuckers. Rage. RAGE. RAAAAAGE!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.baltimoresun.com/ne.....=hootsuite
FTA: "There are consequences to Mr. Bolger that could have been avoided if [Baltimore State's Attorney Marilyn J.] Mosby's office had recognized that this case should not have been prosecuted," Levin said. "She insisted on pursuing a case against a law enforcement officer who gave his professional life to the United States Army and to the city of Baltimore, and it's outrageous that he has suffered as a result."
Go die in a fire, fuckface.
Oh come on, Sloopy. He's such a humanitarian and a hero, he won't even sue the state for his suffering!
Well, probably won't.
And certainly no more than his due.
And maybe a little extra, just to save another hero from such ordeal.
Fucker is getting early retirement. He's already fucking the taxpayers because he's a sociopathic piece of shit.
I sincerely wish him ill will.
#DogLivesMatter
Bolger's attorneys said he was attempting to euthanize the dog in the most humane way possible.
With a combination of three injected drugs?
"the dog choked itself on the pole" that officers were using to try to restrain it."
See he didn't kill it. It committed suicide
Haven't we seen cops use the "you can't determine which one of our bullets killed him so you can't charge any of us" defense recently?
How soon before we hear "the so-called victim died not from the bullet to the heart but from a lack of oxygen to the brain. And since these brave officers are no more responsible for providing oxygen to the brain of the decedent than the man in the moon, I move that the charges be dropped with prejudice, your honor!"
God damn, Sloopy, that's fucking legal gold! Don't just give it away on the Internet, there's hundred of police unions willing to pay good money for such advice!
How soon before we hear "the so-called victim died not from the bullet to the heart but from a lack of oxygen to the brain".
I have heard exactly that said to excuse the animals who beat Kelly Thomas to death. "Oh, he didn't die from the beating. He died from being taken off life support."
I have also heard exactly that said to excuse the animal who killed Eric Garner. "Oh, he didn't die from being choked. He died of a heart attack."
If the fucking pigs can shoot people in the back and nothing happens but some paid vacation, killing a dog is not even going to appear on the radar
Donald Trump Releases His Inner Fascist
Given Reason's latest deluge of oven-ready articles, I'd worry too if I were you.
Yokel not like disagreeing with yokel hero. Yokel threaten you online. Make yokel feel powerful.
"Inner" Fascist?
Palingenetic ultranationalism.
I think what he was getting at was that it was better to compromise the rights of prospective immigrants (ie, people not already in the US, people who are not US citizens) than to compromise the rights of US citizens.
If this "distinction" is where we are, we're already fucked. Nobody's rights or freedom matter.
Also, threading is oppression.
DON'T THREAD ON ME.
Update: I asked around about the two cops who shot the six year old in Marksville. I won't say what I was told but it looks pretty grim for the shooters.
I will keep y'all updated.
Wow man that really burns me up man.
http://www.CompleteAnon.tk
http://www.thedailybeast.com/a.....pital.html
[quote]The Philadelphia Inquirer reported in April how a VA probe found that "of all the VA regional offices, 'Philadelphia is clearly the most problematic'" and that within it "there is such fear of reprisal, and fear from the employees who I believe are trying to do a good job," according to Assistant Inspector General Linda Halliday.
During hearings the first week of November for a joint congressional investigation into VA services and contracting practices, Halliday as well as the head of the Wilmington Veterans Office repeatedly invoked their Fifth Amendment right regarding questions about an "alleged scheme to get herself assigned to the job with less responsibility, the same pay, and a cost to the government of nearly $300,000 in relocation expenses."
In July, a Philadelphia VA psychiatrist told a veteran on Facebook, "off yourself, please."[/quote]
Just hoping I don't have to deal with these morons when I get out.