Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

President Carter Has Brain Cancer, Grand Jury Declines to Indict N.J. Police, Bug Infestation Hits Burning Man Site: P.M. Links

Scott Shackford | 8.20.2015 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Mark Turner
(Mark Turner)
  • Says he's "at ease."
    Credit: Mark Turner

    Cancer in former President Jimmy Carter's liver has also been spotted in his brain. He began radiation therapy today.

  • A grand jury has decided not to indict two New Jersey police officers who opened fire and killed a suspect who threatened them by … stepping out of his car with his hands raised in surrender.
  • Birthright citizenship is the latest subject of debate among presidential candidates, even though they realistically won't be able to implement any changes should they be elected, no matter what people think about "anchor babies."
  • The site for the impending Burning Man festival is infested with swarms of stinkbugs, but organizers are hoping they'll be gone by the end of the month when crowds show up.
  • Greek Prime Minister Alex Tsipras is stepping down just months after being elected and agreeing to cutbacks in order to secure another bailout.
  • An Oklahoma state senator has pleaded guilty to stealing $1.8 million from the Better Business Bureau in Tulsa, where he worked, and filing false federal tax returns. He also resigned from his seat.
  • Investigators are going to recommend vehicular manslaughter charges against Caitlyn Jenner over her role in a deadly car crash in Malibu. 

New at Reason.com:

  • The Federal Reserve is Not Your Friend
    Fed policies disproportionately favor wealth, by Rand Paul and Mark Spitznagel
  • U.S.-Israel Conflicts of Interest Now Impossible to Ignore 
    Iran should be thanked for this valuable service, by Sheldon Richman
  • Can Americans Still Take a Joke? Comedians Say 'No.' 
    Filmmaker Ted Balaker on the 'outrage mob' and fighting back against the PC zealots, by Nick Gillespie and Amanda Winkler

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Hyperloop Project Inches Closer to Becoming a Real Thing

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (391)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Investigators are going to recommend vehicular manslaughter charges against Caitlyn Jenner over her role in a deadly car crash in Malibu.

    Prison could make her regret transitioning.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Hello.

      OH MY GOD WHAT WILL THE PC WORLD THINK OF CAITLYN NOW?!?

      1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        S/he is a Republican, you know.

    2. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

      Maybe that was the whole reasoning for it.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        Even I'm not that cynical.

    3. Illocust   10 years ago

      We're going to hear non-stop about treatment of trans in prison now. Even though there is no way they'll put a celebrity like Jenner somewhere dangerous.

      1. DEG   10 years ago

        Nah, Jenner came out of the closet as a Republican. Jenner's treatment in prison won't matter to the usual suspects.

      2. Tonio   10 years ago

        We already do on OITNB.

        1. Trshmnstr doesn't recycle   10 years ago

          I'm typically pretty good with acronyms, but this one completely eludes me.

          1. In League with the Dark Ones   10 years ago

            Orange is the New Black

    4. Drake   10 years ago

      Will they send him/her to a woman's prison?

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        The activist that heckled Obama demanded that all transgender people be released from prison. So there's that.

        1. Illocust   10 years ago

          Can't they build some one hundred person prison in the middle of Alaska and send all the trans there? It's not like these guys are common, and the nasty environment for yard time ought to keep the non-mentally ill out.

      2. Antilles   10 years ago

        I suspect some type of house arrest, if that.

        1. R C Dean   10 years ago

          For manslaughter? I'd be surprised.

          1. Antilles   10 years ago

            Things are different for the famous, wealthy, and connected. Plus they'd have to deal with the shrieking SJWs, and no one wants that.

          2. Jay Dubya   10 years ago

            its vehicular manslaughter for a car accident in which she wasnt drunk or high. there may be some mitigating details we dont know about but it reeks of bullshit atm.

      3. Tonio   10 years ago

        Will they send him/her to a woman's prison?

        Har, har, Drake, that's a real knee-slapper. Almost as funny as "gays can marry...people of the opposite sex like everyone else."

        1. R C Dean   10 years ago

          Actually, that's an excellent question. Seriously, what prison would they/could they send a pre-op trannie like Brucelyn to? What about post-op?

          1. DesigNate   10 years ago

            I would assume, in the blind eyes of the state, that pre-op gets you put in the male population and post-op gets you put in the female population.

          2. Marty Comanche   10 years ago

            Until recently, the answer would obviously be that Jenner would go to a men's prison. If you were to ask the authors of the AP stylebook or OITNB, then clearly she goes to a women's prison. But I guess, in Tonio's world, the suggestion that this might be a contentious issue is trolling.

    5. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      Joe Rogan covers it pretty well.

      1. Karl Hungus   10 years ago

        Joe Rogan's standup is fucking genius.

        1. Paul.   10 years ago

          So is his overhand right!

          1. Karl Hungus   10 years ago

            Here's his bit on that tiger that escaped its enclosure at the San Francisco Zoo a few years back and attacked the kids that had been throwing shit at it:

            http://www.dailymotion.com/vid.....er_animals

            (use discretion at work)

    6. The Last American Hero   10 years ago

      MANslaughter? Really?

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        Seriously.

        That's insensitive.

        It should be 'Transgenderslaughter'.

        1. Antilles   10 years ago

          The victim was a woman. So, womanslaughter or personslaughter would be more accurate.

          1. brady949   10 years ago

            Stop gendering the victim. What if they are gender fluid?

            1. R C Dean   10 years ago

              Exactly.

              "It-slaughter".

        2. Pathogen   10 years ago

          Cis-PatriarchSlaughter...

      2. Brett L   10 years ago

        Mxslaughter

    7. Paul.   10 years ago

      Hmm, interesting. From what I could tell of the accident details, the Prius driver was primarily responsible for the accident.

      1. egould310 reppin' LBC   10 years ago

        Maybe the Prius driver was also charged? But since the Prius driver is not a millionaire Olympic transvstite tv celebrity it's not newsworthy?

    8. Rasilio   10 years ago

      Maybe that's why she transitioned?

      She knew she was going to jail and is trying to get sent to a womens prison instead of a mens prison

  2. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

    The site for the impending Burning Man festival is infested with swarms of stinkbugs, but organizers are hoping they'll be gone by the end of the month when crowds show up.

    Oh man. Too easy.

    1. Ivan Pike   10 years ago

      is infested with swarms of stinkbugs

      But enough about BLM!?

    2. Rhywun   10 years ago

      They write themselves, don't they.

    3. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      God: Noah! Thy shalt build thyself an ark, measuring 300 cubits in length.
      McClure: 300 cubits... give or take.
      God: Exactly 300! And thou shalt taketh two of every creature.
      McClure: (writing it down) Two creatures.
      God: Two of every creature!
      McClure: Even stink beetles?
      God: Especially stink beetles!

    4. waffles   10 years ago

      I'm going and I'm going to be extra super commando ready this year.

      1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

        No underwear?

        1. waffles   10 years ago

          There really isn't much of a purpose to underwear on the playa.

      2. Granny Weatherwax   10 years ago

        Bring lots of Benadryl. The insect population at Pennsic was super freaky this year. I imagine it will be the same at Burning Man.

        1. waffles   10 years ago

          I don't think these are particularly bitey, more like annoying.

          1. Granny Weatherwax   10 years ago

            It was the ants that got me. There were lots of annoying critters, but the ants were REALLY out and about, not staying properly underground and those fuckers don't need to bite me to make me need the Benadryls.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Greek Prime Minister Alex Tsipras is stepping down just months after being elected and agreeing to cutbacks in order to secure another bailout.

    The Greeks won't abide austerity in any form?

    1. Sevo   10 years ago

      Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

    2. Pathogen   10 years ago

      I suspect that soon enough, it won't be up to them... My spidey senses are tingling..

    3. Zunalter   10 years ago

      Considering the nature of their economy pre-bailout...is that a surprise?

  4. Apatheist ?_??   10 years ago

    You have to watch the bitch slap the judge gives a DOJ lawyer in the video Popehat cites in this article. It's hilarious.

    1. Trump-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

      The legal terminology is "bench slap," but yeah, that was nice.

      1. Libertymike   10 years ago

        How about "wood chip"?

    2. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

      Popehat seems to see this as a welcome relief from the tendency of federal judges to ignore prosecutorial misconduct.

      Of course, in this case, the prosecutorial misconduct involved a leak meant to embarrass the judges and influence their decision. So of course the judges are going to be pissed.

      I'm waiting for the judges to be pissed when a leak is aimed only at a defendant, not at the judges themselves.

      1. gaoxiaen   10 years ago

        It's that troublemaker (I mean that in a good way) Kozinski again. He just can't let the staus be quo.

      2. R C Dean   10 years ago

        Oh, they did that (overturn convictions based on prosecutorial misconduct online),

        Of course, the were convictions of cops, so your larger point stands that they only seem to care when the misconduct inconveniences a member of the Cop-Industrial Complex.

  5. Hugh Akston   10 years ago

    Jimmy Carter is history's greatest monster.

    1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

      Huh - I always had Godzilla as #1. Different strokes, I guess...

    2. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

      He should retire to Monster Island. Which is really more of a peninsula.

      1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

        He should retire to Ape Island. Or what about Candy Apple Island? It has apes, but they're not so big.

      2. Marty Comanche   10 years ago

        Florida?

    3. Paul.   10 years ago

      Jimmy Carter is history's greatest monster

      Over Reagan?

      1. gaoxiaen   10 years ago

        Over Reagan or Bush 2?

      2. Rod Flash   10 years ago

        Over FDR?

  6. Mike M.   10 years ago

    Cancer in former President Jimmy Carter's liver has also been spotted in his brain. He began radiation therapy today.

    Frankly, he's lived long enough.

    1. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

      I really don't think that's very nice. Seriously.

      1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

        If you think that's not nice, wait until you hear his Jimmy Carter nickname. You thought his 'block insane yomamma' was bad......

        1. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

          "Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement."

      2. Mike M.   10 years ago

        If I really wanted to be a dick, I'd wish 444 days of agony on him.

        Give him his sweet release and let him go to the big peanut farm in the sky.

      3. R C Dean   10 years ago

        I'm with Notorious.

        Metastasizing cancer is a Very Bad Thing. Very few deserve it, and Jimmy isn't on that list.

        1. Trshmnstr doesn't recycle   10 years ago

          I'm gonna go the opposite direction of MM on this one. I'm glad to live in a country where a 90 year old can fight his ass off trying to beat metastasized cancer, and that the government can't do anything to stop him.

          1. Pathogen   10 years ago

            He's on a different health care plan than you... Your results may vary..

          2. Zunalter   10 years ago

            For the elite classes, that will always be the case...

        2. UCrawford   10 years ago

          Agreed. I think most here would agree that Carter was an abysmal President and many of his policies were disastrous, but being inept isn't a reason to want someone to suffer from the kinds of cancer he has. It's a horrible way to go, and the treatment isn't much better. I wish him luck in his fight.

  7. Apatheist ?_??   10 years ago

    Reason H&R J sub D Memorial Fantasy Football League 2015

    Due to Ken's schedule I have been promoted to acting commissioner for this year's league.

    If you participated previously and have not joined back up yet please check your spam folders as apparently the Yahoo emails can get filtered there.

    We may have an open spot so if anybody is interested in joining please email me at the address in my handle.

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      Ken's schedule of drinking poolside?

      1. pan fried wylie   10 years ago

        What's the recipe for a Poolside, sounds refreshing.

    2. Rasilio   10 years ago

      Id there is an opening I'm interested

  8. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

    The site for the impending Burning Man festival is infested with swarms of stinkbugs, but organizers are hoping they'll be gone by the end of the month when crowds show up.

    Just play some Slayer. Hippies hate Slayer.

    1. 3   10 years ago

      +1 raining blood

    2. Mad Scientist   10 years ago

      God listens to Slayer!

  9. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Birthright citizenship is the latest subject of debate among presidential candidates...

    I don't understand the problem they have. If you're born in this country, you most likely will grow up in this country. You won't be bringing cultural baggage. You will be assimilated. Isn't that the argument?

    1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

      SHTUTHEFUCKUP ANKURRRRRRRRBABEEEEEEEEEEEEZ@!!111

      1. Marty Comanche   10 years ago

        I tried to subscribe to your newsletter at the email provided, but it keeps bouncing. Please direct my subscription to spongebob@mailinator.com.

    2. Illocust   10 years ago

      It's the parents that are the problem.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        Do we have numbers on how many illegals the anchorbabymaking costs American purity? Can it really account for that much that we're willing to put our citizenship in the hands of bureaucrats?

        1. Lord at War   10 years ago

          If there are 11,000,000 illegals present in America, and they each have 2 anchor babies children, it will cost 2.5 billion to educate them before they drop out in 10th grade...

          Don't call it "welfare" because everone gets it!!!!!

      2. Episteme   10 years ago

        At the rate he's going, Trump will be calling for TRUMP-brand Dickensian orphanariums within the week. How else are we going to get enough ICE agents to patrol the border if we don't sweep up the most terrific Mexican young people and brainwash them to Make America Strong Again!

    3. DJF   10 years ago

      For one thing, once the baby is born then the parents, siblings, and all the others in the family get to stay in the country or a way to enter the country. That is why they are called anchor babies.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        Be that as it may, the sins of an American's foreign-born parents cannot be visited upon him. This I declare to you.

        1. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

          I'm pretty separating a small child from his parents would be a harsher punishment than keeping him America, at least if we're talking about Mexico. Maybe if we were talking ISIS territory, the calculus would be different.

          In practice, kids don't really have much in the way of citizenship anyway until they reach their majority.

      2. Rhywun   10 years ago

        Then stop "chain immigration". That should in fact be easy to do.

        1. Illocust   10 years ago

          In the case of the infant what do you do? Put him up for adoption?

          1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

            You could always send him to be reared in Mexico, and once he's learned all those filthy Mexican traits, watch him walk back across the border with that valid birth certificate and run for president. At the very least, you'll make him pay taxes to the U.S. no matter where he lives.

            1. Overt   10 years ago

              You could always send him to be reared in Mexico,

              Which is what happens ALL THE TIME. I had a friend who defended illegals in deportation proceedings. The "My baby is an American Citizen" defense never worked for parents. They would be welcome to give the kid to a citizen relative or take the baby home with them. This, of course, assumes they were taken to deportation proceedings, which was rare.

              1. Zeb   10 years ago

                Yeah, that was my understanding too. It is not uncommon for parents of US citizens to be deported.

                1. Marty Comanche   10 years ago

                  Much of the debate surrounding immigration is fact-free. Listen to the birthers or the geniuses who think Ted Cruz is a naturalized citizen. Of course they would believe that all parents of "anchor babies" are automatically given citizenship and a five figure monthly stipend. Oh, and the Mexican government has an elaborate program for selecting which citizens will be sent abroad to collect benefits and send that money back as remittances. If you ask for evidence to back these claims, then you're for AMNESTY!

          2. Rhywun   10 years ago

            I would allow the parents and the kid to stay, and I would not give any preference to any of their relatives if they wanted to come along.

      3. Calidissident   10 years ago

        The kid has to be 21 before he or she can sponsor family members to get into the country. Simply have a kid with citizenship doesn't mean you can't get deported.

        1. Marty Comanche   10 years ago

          Never bring facts to a scream fight.

      4. Episteme   10 years ago

        New plan: the Anchor Babies get to stay in the Southwestern US, but the family has to stand just across the border attached to the child by a long rope (like a literal anchor) until the child in 21 ?it would be cruel to separate them, after all ? which will be replaced with high-tech fiberoptic wire (allowing for better communication) as prices drop...

    4. Antilles   10 years ago

      Don't know if this is just an urban legend, but don't wealthy, Chinese women come to the US just to have a child and then return to their homeland for some unknown, future nefarious purpose? Disturbing if it's true, and the fact is most countries don't have birthright citizenship. But I suppose it's moot since it would be impossible to change here.

      1. tarran   10 years ago

        Someone should disguise themselves as a chinaman and infiltrate PF Changs. If they pull it off, they're sure to find out when the invasion is planned.

        1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

          Lacist.

          1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

            Also... "an Asian-themed US casual dining restaurant chain owned and operated by Centerbridge Partners and headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona."

            Gah dam Arizonians! Arways tear down my shity wahl!

            1. tarran   10 years ago

              Hey! At least they don't shoot people in the dick!

              1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

                Michael: How about we send him to Transylvania?

                Pete: Nah, he'd probably see it as something to brag about someday to his little vampire buddies.

                Henrietta: If we're gonna send him somewhere it should be the most horrible, most miserable place on Earth.

                [Pause] All: Scottsdale.

                1. Zunalter   10 years ago

                  Apache Junction, maybe, but not Scottsdale.

        2. DesigNate   10 years ago

          Just make sure you don't shoot anyone in the dick.

      2. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

        unknown, future nefarious purpose?

        You mean trying to game residency requirements for in-state tuition at public flagship universities?

        I'd be more concerned about all the Saudi women coming here for birthin' babies, honestly.

        1. Antilles   10 years ago

          Never heard the reason why they do this (IF they really do this), so I assumed it was for a sinister reason because that makes a more interesting story. Think about it, one of them can become President someday and surrender our whole country to China!

          1. Tejicano   10 years ago

            +1 Manchurian candidate

        2. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

          I'd be more concerned about all the Saudi women coming here for birthin' babies, honestly

          Interesting. Link?

          I would like to think it's so their own daughters won't be chattel like then. But I doubt it.

          1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

            Interesting. Link?

            That observation is based from my own experience working at a university that is eligible to accept King Abdullah Scholarship program students.

            Google only gives me links to the Chinese phenomenon.

      3. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        Chapo Guzman's wife did it.

        http://www.breitbart.com/big-g.....alifornia/

        1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          Trigger warning: Breitbart.

          It was the first google hit.

        2. Zeb   10 years ago

          Oh, come on. That's just the plot from, Weeds, isn't it?

          1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

            Did she look like this?

      4. R C Dean   10 years ago

        Don't know if this is just an urban legend, but don't wealthy, Chinese women come to the US just to have a child

        Absolutely. Its a well-known and profitable business on the West Coast. Concierge anchor babies.

        and then return to their homeland for some unknown, future nefarious purpose?

        Couldn't say.

        1. Calidissident   10 years ago

          "Concierge anchor babies."

          It doesn't really make sense to use the term anchor babies here. These are generally wealthy women who enter the country legally, have the kid and return home. If they want to use the kid to get permanent residency legally, they have to wait till they're 21.

      5. Calidissident   10 years ago

        "and the fact is most countries don't have birthright citizenship."

        This is true worldwide, but nearly every country in the Americas does.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_soli

    5. Leigh   10 years ago

      My wife used to be a Doula - (Labor Coach). She had more than one client that were of Indian (India's) descent coming from Dubai, that spent thousand of dollars just to have their kid born here in the US. Make that of what you will.

      1. tarran   10 years ago

        A Turkish relative (wife of one of my first cousins) did it. In her case, though, she wanted the best obstetrics possible and could pay for it (her dad is some sort of construction magnate and they are ungodly rich).

        I don't think the U.S. is in danger of being swamped by the pampered princesses of the middle east's elite.

    6. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      So, what are they going to do, amend the Constitution? Or will they just reclass citizenship as a tax?

      1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

        Interestingly enough, it's not really that clear in the 14th amendment. It took a single interpretation in the majority opinion of a 5-4 SCOTUS decision within the past 50 years to make it 'law'.

        Get a good enough case all the way to the Supreme Court, and perhaps the reach of the 14th amendment could be redefined. I don't think it would need a new constitutional amendment.

        Is there any other country on Earth that gives you automatic citizenship just because the mother was temporarily in the country, and neither parent was a citizen?

        1. Antilles   10 years ago

          Out of 190 countries, 33 offer birthright citizenship. Of those 33, the only two developed nations that do are the USA and Canada. Make of that what you will...

        2. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

          Is there any other country on Earth that gives you automatic citizenship just because the mother was temporarily in the country, and neither parent was a citizen?

          The vast majority of the Western Hemisphere, actually.

        3. paranoid android   10 years ago

          Is there any other country on Earth that gives you automatic citizenship just because the mother was temporarily in the country, and neither parent was a citizen?

          Are you suggesting that our policies should be judged by whether other countries have those same policies? Do you like the implications that would have for gun control and health care?

          1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

            Choose one

          2. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

            Are you suggesting that our policies should be judged by whether other countries have those same policies? Do you like the implications that would have for gun control and health care?

            No, just curious, actually. I truly didn't know if any other country had birthright citizenship, but knew others in our brilliant commentariat would -- and indeed Antilles and Heroic Mulatto had the facts.

            I have very little interest in the "If Timmy jumped off the Empire State Building, would you as well?" school of political thought.

            1. paranoid android   10 years ago

              No, just curious, actually. I truly didn't know if any other country had birthright citizenship, but knew others in our brilliant commentariat would -- and indeed Antilles and Heroic Mulatto had the facts.

              I have very little interest in the "If Timmy jumped off the Empire State Building, would you as well?" school of political thought.

              I apologize for misinterpreting you, then.

        4. James Anderson Merritt   10 years ago

          I agree C. Anacreon: the current view of birthright citizenship was not intended by the authors of the 14th Amendment, and they SAID as much, at the time. The "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" phrase in the actual Amendment text is important, but has been pretty much ignored and thwarted by modern jurisprudence. The point of that phrase was to award birthright citizenship to people who were born here, but were not presumed to be subjects of (loyal to) a foreign power. That clearly includes U.S.-born babies of U.S. citizens, but also can include children born to citizens of U.S. territories, babies born at foreign U.S. embassies to U.S. citizens, U.S. born babies born to "stateless" people who have come to the U.S., and, as originally intended, U.S.-born children of freed-slaves, to name just a few categories. Native Americans, who are citizens of tribal nations, were NOT originally seen as eligible for 14th Amendment birthright citizenship, even if their mothers birthed them off the reservation and on uncontested U.S. soil. Congress had to (and did) pass Federal legislation to deal with U.S. citizenship for Native Americans. The U.S.-born babies of tourists, long-term residents of the U.S. who do not seek U.S. citizenship, and "illegals" were never considered to be eligible for birthright citizenship until the Supreme Court said so, waving hands and blowing smoke into the mirrors, fairly recently in our history.

          1. James Anderson Merritt   10 years ago

            We are wrong to rely on a mis-reading of the 14th Amendment that continues to be propagated because of the legal tradition of "Stare Decicis." If we really want to legitimize the current practice of birthright citizenship, Congress should either pass explicit legislation authorizing it (which Congress can do under its naturalization powers), or, even better, amend the Constitution to make that policy the law of the land.

          2. Calidissident   10 years ago

            Illegal immigrants are most definitely subject to US jurisdiction.

            If by "fairly recently" you mean 1898 or 1844 then yeah, I guess.

            "Throughout the history of the United States, the dominant legal principle governing citizenship has been jus soli?the principle that birth within the territorial limits of the United States confers automatic citizenship, excluding slaves before the American Civil War.[8][9][10] Although there was no actual definition of citizenship in United States law until after the Civil War,[11] it was generally accepted that anyone born in the United States was automatically a citizen.[12][13] This applicability of jus soli, via the common law inherited in the United States from England, was upheld in an 1844 New York state case, Lynch v. Clarke, in which it was held that a woman born in New York City, of alien parents temporarily sojourning there, was a U.S. citizen.[14]"

            (From the wiki page on US vs. Wong Kim Ark)

            If these decisions were reached even in times of tremendous xenophobia and racism like the 1800s, I seriously doubt the other side holds water.

            Please cite this claim:

            "I agree C. Anacreon: the current view of birthright citizenship was not intended by the authors of the 14th Amendment, and they SAID as much, at the time."

        5. Zeb   10 years ago

          All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

          Seems like one of the clearest, most straightforward parts of the constitution to me. Unless you have diplomatic immunity, you are subject to the jurisdiction of the US. Illegal immigrants are also clearly subject to US jurisdiction as they are frequently arrested and deported and stuff. "Born" and "in" are pretty unambiguous. Where is it in any way unclear or ambiguous?

        6. Calidissident   10 years ago

          US vs. Wong Kim Ark happened in 1898, and was a 6-2 decision. And it partially based its opinion on court cases from 1844 and 1812.

    7. Pathogen   10 years ago

      Yeah... but their parents ALWAYS vote ass...

  10. Brian   10 years ago

    It couldn't have happened to a better goober.

    1. Antilles   10 years ago

      Having watched my mother (slowly) die of cancer, I would never wish that fate on anyone. As much as I despise Jimmy Carter this news gives me no joy. If it did then that would make me a Progressive.

      1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

        ^^this

        1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

          Yup. You wouldn't wish cancer on your worst enemy. It really sucks.

          (signed)
          One Who Knows....

      2. Tejicano   10 years ago

        Watched a friend, same age as me, die of brain cancer. They removed a tumor which had an obvious effect on his behavior. It was pretty grim.

  11. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

    Investigators are going to recommend vehicular manslaughter charges against Caitlyn Jenner over her role in a deadly car crash in Malibu.

    Will the patriarchy never stop? I can't even. SMDH.

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      He did it as a dude, though.

      1. mad.casual   10 years ago

        So then they're charging Bruce Jenner for his role, right? Or Caitlyn Jenner as played by Bruce? I need to consult my Chicago Manual of Style.

        1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          Wait, that's it. Bruce Jenner, who committed the crime, is no more. Case dismissed!

          1. Mickey Rat   10 years ago

            I thought it ws he nevr really existed.

            1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

              Even better.

            2. Rhywun   10 years ago

              Like the vowels in your comment?

      2. Rt. Hon. Judge Woodrow Chipper   10 years ago

        So he's just being a pro-active prison bitch then.

  12. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

    So although I didn't explicitly state it, beach volleyball is of course out of bounds of Accomplished Female Athletes of Eastern and Central Europe series, for same reason as tennis, figure skating and artistic gymnastics. Regular volleyball is not, however, so today I present Ivana Nesovic, member of Serbian female volleyball team, who currently plays in Greece professionally, and her team just won the cup fifth year in a row.
    Couple shots from her career in Serbia.
    Glamor shots from Greece.

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      Argentinians are volleyball's goddesses. Their uniforms are.... nice.

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        Por Ejemplo

        1. DesigNate   10 years ago

          Holy sweet science!

  13. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    The site for the impending Burning Man festival is infested with swarms of stinkbugs, but organizers are hoping they'll be gone by the end of the month when crowds show up.

    One whiff of the hippies and those stinkbugs are outa there.

    1. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

      Hippy to Stinkbug = "Ewwwwww!!! Actual Nature!"

  14. Sevo   10 years ago

    The HORROR!
    Uber contract with some drivers drivers who were convicted of a crime more than 7 years ago!
    "DA: major flaws in Uber background checks allow criminal drivers"
    http://www.sfgate.com/business.....453865.php

    A month or so ago, the concern-trolls were whining that Apple didn't want cons on the job site of its new headquarters. Now they're whining that Uber might.
    Do we detect the lefty predilection toward hypocrisy here?

    1. Ted S.   10 years ago

      Isn't 7 years the standard background check?

      1. tarran   10 years ago

        Yes.

    2. Antilles   10 years ago

      This is a travesty! Because I'm sure every 'real' taxi driver out there has a perfect and spotless record. I'm sure we'd hear about it if they didn't...

    3. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

      Wait, isn't it a civil-rights violation to ask about criminal history, according to the EEOC?

      Can't these idiots get their talking points straight?

      1. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

        The point is for these people to stoke their smug. Once they're awash in smug, they won't care if there is a worthwhile rebuttal out there.

        1. Sevo   10 years ago

          Also, the DA hasn't been getting much ink recently.

  15. Ted S.   10 years ago

    Ooh, I see Sheldon Richman has an article up. 🙂

    1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

      I went over there, but it isn't even fun to hate on. At this point, Richman is basically just writing for click bait. I don't think even Heroic Mulatto responding will make that worth it.

      1. John Titor   10 years ago

        The only thing Richman does for Reason is get clicks and utterly ruin their foreign policy credentials.

        1. lap83   10 years ago

          " utterly ruin their foreign policy credentials."

          The sad thing is I don't think they realize it

          1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

            Well, to be fair, no one ever thought Reason had any credentials.

          2. John Titor   10 years ago

            The funniest thing is, if they had both Richman and a more warhawk guy who was equally insane it probably balance out. I mean, I can't expect Reason to actually hire a good foreign policy correspondent, that would be asking for too much. Get a realist or something.

        2. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

          Rest of staff has the same FP view as he does. This is a magazine that had exactly one guy maybe broach an idea that invading a country because they got rid of a corrupt criminal is a not a libertarian-approved response, and he no longer works here (Zenon Evans). Everyone else was all "Ukraine is different than Iraq, because reasons!"
          But Richman can get the clicks, though latest article I think tries too hard.

          1. lap83   10 years ago

            I don't think the others are as bad as him. Richman actually hates the US. The rest are just naive.

            1. Mickey Rat   10 years ago

              And he hates Israel more than the US.

              1. lap83   10 years ago

                yeah that too

          2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

            Reason's foreign policy writing is consistently terrible since the only people who really write about other countries are Dahlmia and Richman, who are both pretty much universally hated.

            They're also completely predictable in a way that makes me think they don't actually know what they're talking about and just apply the same arguments regardless of what's actually going on. So Israel is always at fault for Richman and also every problem can be solved with more immigration per Dahlmia.

            1. John Titor   10 years ago

              Well it's blatantly obvious that both of them form their opinions based on their biases, then cherry-pick all the evidence they can find. Reason could probably get away with this if they had more diversity of opinion when it comes to foreign policy but with just those two talking it comes off as the utterly insane musings of a stoned IR student who read too much on neo-colonialism that day.

              1. Libertymike   10 years ago

                As a general proposition, why should Reason, a publication ostensibly devoted to free minds and free markets, genuflect to diversity?

                1. John Titor   10 years ago

                  It helps in the sense that, if you're producing garbage foreign policy articles, it at least makes it look like you're attempting to actually have a debate and reason out complex problems. Richman and Dalmia are entirely driven by their own biases and are utterly incapable of even attempting to look at a situation objectively. Regardless of the actual context, Richman always follows the same, utterly inconsistent narrative: America is the aggressive power, the aggressive actions of other nations are never to be held to the same standard, implicit trust in the statements of foreign governments for no reason other than they challenge U.S. interest (and this, by the way, is how Richman utterly ruins the libertarian label. He refuses to hold foreign governments to any kind of libertarian standard in order to carve out his narrative),nationalism is terrible except for when its people Richman likes, like Palestinians, in which case he'll post your flag on his page.

                  A more diverse foreign policy range would at least show an attempt at thought. Richman and Dalmia's work really only highlights Reason's utter intellectual bankruptcy when it comes to foreign policy.

                  1. John Titor   10 years ago

                    If you want a TL;DR version: If Reason is actually devoted to 'free minds' then they'd cut Richman out. Because he does not have a free mind, he has a mind enslaved to a specific narrative that is an absolute lie when contrasted to reality. A 'free mind' does not constitute a delusional or dishonest one, as these are the only two possibilities for Richman's behaviour.

                    1. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

                      "If Reason is actually devoted to 'free minds' then they'd cut Richman out."

                      ^^^yep

                      he's a one-trick pony who's one trick was never very interesting. And through all of his intellectual pretensions and claim to philosophical purity, he isn't either very smart, or have any coherent foreign-policy insight.

                    2. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

                      claim to philosophical purity

                      Purity? From the man who penned the essay "Nationalism is a Poison" yet maintains a webpage that looks like an internet Palestinian Flag Museum?

                    3. lap83   10 years ago

                      " Because he does not have a free mind"

                      at best, he has the kind of mind you get free with purchase of a Max Blumenthal book.

          3. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

            Rest of staff has the same FP view as he does

            Didn't used to be that way. Back in the day, we had Harsyani, Moynihan, Zaxxon, and John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt to counter Richman. Unfortunately, they seem to have been consciously purged during the past, say 3 years.

            Not that I always agreed with the above either, but a damn shame.

            1. grrizzly   10 years ago

              I think reason still posts Harsanyi's column, usually Friday afternoon. I liked Moynihan too.

              1. Florida Man   10 years ago

                Was it ever confirmed that Moynihan is a vampire? Because he looks like a vampire.

          4. Calidissident   10 years ago

            Aside from Richman (who I don't recall if he did or not, I rarely read his articles), who defended Russia's invasion of Ukraine?

            1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

              Richman

              Yet another manufactured crisis ? costing over 2,000 lives. It could be brought to a speedy end if Barack Obama would give the word.

              Tucille

              And while the near-unanimous results of Crimea's vote to join Russia seem a tad...dubious, even granting the limited options offered, it's highly likely that the region, with historical ties to Russia, would have voted to realign its borders even if the voting had been conducted by more rigorous standards.

              1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

                "Yet another manufactured crisis ? costing over 2,000 lives. It could be brought to a speedy end if Barack Obama would give the word."

                This is amazing. Richman lives in a parallel universe.

              2. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

                Sullum

                Russia, which controlled Crimea from 1783 until Nikita Khrushchev arbitrarily assigned it to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic in 1954, could argue that reversing the transfer upholds the principle of state sovereignty, even as it respects democracy and the right to self-determination. We like all of those things, right?

                Doherty

                Walt's argument is based on the notion that Russia is not in fact an expansionist power getting out of control, but one spiraling downward fighting for continued relevance and influence
                ....
                Our brave Ukrainian supposed allies gave an interesting sign of how devoted they are to American notions of freedom this week, by arresting a journalist for encouraging draft dodging.

                1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

                  And congratulations Reason, your shitty website has convinced me to finally put Adblock on, because I'm sick of having to wait five minutes for my computer to stop dying every time I search your shitty site.

                  Feeney

                  . Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty states that an attack on a member state in Europe or North America would constitute an attack on each member and that such an attack would be met with assistance that could include military force for the attacked party from other NATO members.

                  As Logan points out, this sort of alliance made sense in the wake of the end of World War II, but that there is no risk today of Moscow dominating Europe today:

                  In the context of "German Aryans must not have fallen to Russia then but fuck Slavic subhumans, they can be enslaved at will."
                  Krayewski

                  It has effectively been under Russian control since the beginning of the month, when pro-Russian but unmarked soldiers positioned themselves across the region

                  It's OK to say "Russians invaded." Ron Paul will forgive you.

                  1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

                    Now compare that to Evans

                    War is foggy and Russia has deliberately obscured facts about its assault on Ukrainian lives and independence for months in order to make it all the foggier. None of this is to say that any other nation must come to Ukraine's defense, but it is wrong to pretend that today's border crossing is not part of a Russian invasion.

    2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      I hated him before it was cool.

  16. John Titor   10 years ago

    So I haven't been around for the Canadians complaining about the elections. What's everyone's plans for voting? Because as of right now I feel like I should just skip the damn thing. Convince me it's actually worth it.

    1. Ted S.   10 years ago

      Can you cast a write-in vote?

      Write in "None of the above" or some such.

    2. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

      It was mostly Cytotoxic having a hissy fit about how C-51 is the WORST THING FOR LIBERTIES EVER, and how NDP isn't so bad and Harper will just implement NDP policies. And Rufus giving me condolences on my riding, which is the lair of Hedy Fry and her 22 year-long winning streak.
      I may throw my vote on our Libertarian candidate, if I can trust LP not to be complete assholes. They did allow Lauren Southern back in as a candidate, but fuck those guys for even considering dropping her. Oh no, she went to Slut Walk in Vancouver and held the sign that said "There is no rape culture in the West."
      Of course it's possible NDP might be able to overtake Hedy this time, as her vote share is shrinking, and she's 74 years old, and as useless as a sentient creature can be. No chance that Conservatives can do anything, but better Fry than a Commie.

      1. John Titor   10 years ago

        Nickel Belt's my current riding, so any chance of anything but NDP/Liberal is unlikely. They have actual Marxist-Leninist party members run here but never a libertarian.

      2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

        They did allow Lauren Southern back in as a candidate, but fuck those guys for even considering dropping her. Oh no, she went to Slut Walk in Vancouver and held the sign that said "There is no rape culture in the West."

        Lauren Southern is the greatest thing to happen to Canadian politics since Thomas Mulcair's lizard overlords taught him what a meatapes smile is supposed to look like.

        "We obey," whispered Mulcair with the sibilant tones native to his kind. "One day, all shall rise from the depths of the hollow earth and drive the meatapes before our fangs and claws."

        1. John Titor   10 years ago

          To be fair to Mulcair, he's had to step up as party leader after a guy who was basically elevated to the level of a saint when he died. Jack Layton's sudden death has changed him into the progressive/leftist messiah who would have saved them all from Harper. Some get really, really touchy if you point out Layton's backdoor deals.

        2. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

          Thomas Mulcair's lizard overlords

          David Rockefeller gets involved in Canuck politics now?

        3. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

          What's insane is that woman is only 19! And yet she has more poise, courage, brains and style than any MP, or possibly a whole crapload of them put together.

          The fact that party wanted to boot her because she upset SJW, people who think "Libertarian" is fun little way to say "Nazi," makes me go, "fuck it, I'll take a tax cut."

          1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

            The fact that Lauren Southern got an SJW to make this means that she will always have a special place in my heart, normally reserved for war heroes, puppies, and healers of the blind.

            1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

              Holy shit! That's truly amazing.

      3. Ted S.   10 years ago

        Hedy Fry

        You mean "Hedley".

        1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

          Damn you! Damn you to hell!

      4. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

        It's HEDLEY!

    3. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      I don't know if I have the balls to spoil the ballot.

      It's slim pickings for sure.

      In any event, Harper wins by default because the other two are just not my bag.

      1. John Titor   10 years ago

        Harper's in the scenario where I know who he is and I know how he acts. The Tories have their obvious corruption and idiotic policies, but they've at least been predictable. Trudeau is one of the idealist morons who has absolutely no idea what he's doing and is likely to be an utter disaster. Mulcair is the typical petty, clueless NDP member with a few positives in regards to challenging certain Tory policies. May is equally clueless, and her party is made up of some of the craziest people on the Canadian political spectrum. Harper ends up 'winning by default' only because he's terrible in a way I'm used to.

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          Pretty much this.

          My apolitical wife can't even digest Trudeau. She grows suspicious of people vulnerable to gaffes followed by apologies.

          He needs to unbutton his shirt more.

        2. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

          I'm honestly pulling for Harper because of relentless media campaign against him.
          "old man yells at journos, don't vote Harper" is pushing me over the edge.

      2. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

        It's slim pickings for sure.

        That's Slim Pickens!!

        /enough Blazing Saddles references in this subthread for today

        1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

          No such thing!

        2. gaoxiaen   10 years ago

          +1 H-bomb rodeo

    4. Gene   10 years ago

      No one worth voting for here in s/w Ontario, no libertarian candidate on the ballot.

      If it wasn't for their unending support for the war on drugs I would likely vote conservative, I just can't bring myself to vote for someone who would have me jailed for my interest in cannabis.

      No mater how reasonable they may appear on the economic front, it ain't enough to overlook how bad they are on liberty... bill c-51, the omnibus crime bill and so on.

  17. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

    Someone found this hilarious crazy woman who is running for president.

    Via internet sleuthing, I discovered her FEC filings and they are wonderful.

    I think my favorite part is that she wants the FCC to send a carbon copy to, in her words,

    Copy: US Congress, RNC, DNC, GOP, Media, et al

    What's the best part of this: That she wants a copy sent to Congress generally, but with no specification of who, the fact that she thinks you can send a letter just to the 'media,' or the fact that she has 'et al' on the end of it, which appears to mean she wants this letter to go to everybody on Earth.

    1. Ted S.   10 years ago

      Mary Stack is running for president?

      /barf

      1. Mickey Rat   10 years ago

        You take that back!

        Mary Stack is not hilarious.

    2. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

      Business People, Astronauts, Academics, Underwater Welders, et al

    3. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      Someone?!?!

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        Even I know it was Heroic!

        C'man Irish!

        1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

          I blame the alcohol.

    4. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

      "Help me to save our endangered world and our precious and endangered White Christian European Descent Race now facing Race Extinction within One Hundred Years by making me your US President!"

      This follows a section where she explains she is mostly Puerto Rican, and only recently Catholic (I assume prior to that she was vaguely Santer?a)

      1. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

        Maybe she's a Catholic, or maybe she's Catholic only in the same sense that she's a "NATIONAL SECURITY WITNESS IN A WORLDWIDE BLACK OPS TECHNOLOGY GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION CASE"

      2. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

        (I assume prior to that she was vaguely Santer?a)

        is that the feminine variation of 'Santorum'?

        1. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

          Its the Latin version of Caribbean Voodoo

      3. Calidissident   10 years ago

        I think she wrote that she was partially of Puerto Rican/Spanish descent. There are white Latin Americans, and I don't see why they're any less capable of being white supremacists than any other group of white people.

    5. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

      And here's an actual report she sent to the FEC:

      I AM A NATIONAL SECURITY WITNESS IN A WORLDWIDE BLACK OPS TECHNOLOGY GOVERNMENT
      CORRUPTION CASE AND THE STEP-DAUGHTER OF A FORMER US SECRET SERVICE AGENT TO PRESIDENT
      LYNDON BAYNES JOHNSON AT THE WHITE HOUSE. GOOD GOVERNMENT AND I ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE
      PROPER TREATMENT OF ITS US CITIZENRY. OUR COUNTRY'S FOUNDING WHITE CHRISTIAN EUROPEAN
      DESCENT RACE IS FACING EMASCULATION-DISENFRANCHISEMENT-RACE EXTINaiON WORLDWIDE DUE IN
      PART TO BEING DENIED LIFE EXTENSION WHILE MINORITIES FLOOD OUR COUNTRIES. AND ALL PERSONS ARE
      SUBJECT TO CRIME-TERRORISM-WARS-NATURAL CATASTROPHIES-DISABILITY-POVERTY-FAILINQ HEALTH.
      ILLEGAL MINORITIES ARE GIVEN PATHWAYS TO CITIZENSHIP ACCESSING AND ENDANGERING OUR
      SOCIOECONOMIC ENTITLEMENTS FACING MASSIVE CUTS HARMING OUR US BORN CITIZENRY-LAWFUL ENTRY
      NATIONALIZED US CITIZENS/RESIDENTS ET AL INCLUDING OUR SIXTY MILLION RETIRING BABY BOOMERS. THE
      ELDERLY, THE DISABLED, AND THE INDIGENT DESPERATELY DEPEND ON WELFARE AND FOOD STAMPS, SOCIAL
      SECURITY, MEDICAID AND MEDICARE. WE MUST MAINTAIN RESPONSIBLE CONTINUITY OF PREVIOUS
      GOVERNMENT LEGISLATION. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ALL GOVERNMENT TO PRINT THE NEEDED MONIES
      AND PAY OFF OUR NATIONAL DEBT WHILE THE POPULATION HISTORICALLY PAYS A FAIR CONTRIBUTORY RATE
      OF TAXATION WHICH SHOULD NEVER EXCEED TEN PERCENT ANNUAL INCOME.

      1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

        MY PROGRAMS ARE SUPPORTED BY US CONGRESS, US
        ARMY GEN. RETIRED TOMMY FRANKS, FORMER DNC CHAIRMAN HOWARD DEAN, FORMER RNC CHAIRMANS
        KEN MEHLMAN & MIKE DUNCAN, FORMER USAG HON JANET RENO & JOHN ASHSCROFT, US TREASURY
        SECRETARIES, FEDERAL RESERVE CHAIR(S), AND OTHERS. SUPPORT SILVIA STAGG FOR PRESIDENTI

        Remember: This is an FEC filing in which she's apparently telling random FEC employees who will read this that they should vote for her.

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          2012-2014 until we get there! Where ever there is!

        2. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

          I fail to see how her platform differs from Donald Trump's.

      2. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

        I'm not one to suggest that a person should summarily be placed into a mental institution, but... yeah.

    6. Suthenboy   10 years ago

      I used to work with schizophrenics. That poor woman needs some help.

      1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

        Damn, if true, this really pushes the old hot/crazy matrix calculation into areas of high-performance computing...

        1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          The calculation seems really simple to me.

          1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

            Slav-hispanic combo? I have to go into some serious counting before I can make a decision.

            If she only had 25 pounds more, or a picture with dead bunny, I'd know which side she falls on!

          2. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

            Yeah, this sounds like reference point; a hard limit at the edge of the matrix.

    7. waffles   10 years ago

      She misspelled gmail in her filing. That's impressive.

  18. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

    Cancer in former President Jimmy Carter's liver has also been spotted in his brain.

    Well, that explains a lot.

    (I dislike that man.)

    1. Free Society   10 years ago

      I hope you don't dislike me

      1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

        I love everyone who posts on Reason. Even the trolls. Trolls are people too.

        Nobody on Reason has been a net negative to the human race as Mr. Carter has been.

        1. Libertymike   10 years ago

          Then you must hate Reagan, GWHB, Clinton, W, and Hussein Obama even more as they have been more of a negative to the human race than the peanut farmer.

          1. Tejicano   10 years ago

            Crimes of omission can have as bad an effect as crimes committed. And Carter's omissions were monumental - some set the stage for problems we're still dealing with.

  19. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

    Family Values = Behead Your Sister To Maintain Your 'Family Reputation'

    1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      Yeah...thanks for all the detail, Fox News.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        I don't like to judge, but much of India seems to flirt with third worldism

        1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

          Especially North India. North India, especially the northeastern most provinces (Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, etc.), are some of the most crowded and poor places in the country. All of the problems poverty brings: poor education, lack of sanitation, etc. are present. However, in this particular case, the variable seems to be the city's 33 percent Muslim minority. Not that Hindus have entirely clean hands when it comes to such things.

        2. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

          Flirt? Over 500 million people in India do not have access to a toilet. This doesn't mean simply that they don't have indoor plumbing, they don't have access to a toilet anywhere in their community, period. It is SOP to defecate in the 'yard' around your domicile, which as you might suspect leads to a lot of disease problems.

          I often think of this whenever I hear people moan about the levels of abject 'poverty' we have in the USA.

          1. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

            #EndCapitalism

    2. Enough About Woodchippers   10 years ago

      Dad lets daughter drown in Dubai so she's not 'dishonored' by male lifeguards' touch

      1. Rich   10 years ago

        "Death before dishonor."

        1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

          Definitely a good day to die!

          /inappropriate

      2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        Smells a little fishy.

  20. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

    We must jail sex offenders forever because of high and frightening recidivism rates!

    The real rate of sex offender recidivism is complicated and difficult to calculate, but it's nowhere near 80 percent. In fact, people convicted of sex offenses re-offend at a lower rate than any other class of crimes. The Ellmans point to a meta-study of 8,000 sex offenders which found that even among high-risk offenders, 20 percent had committed another sex crime within five years, and 32 percent had within 15. Of the high-risk offenders who had gone 16 years without re-offending (about two thirds of them), the study found no example of one of them committing another crime. Among low risk offenders, the risk is minimal. "About 97.5% of the low-risk offenders were offense-free after five years; about 95% were still offense-free after 15 years," the Ellmans write.

    Oh.

    1. Ted S.   10 years ago

      Why do you hate the children?

      Oh wait, it's Nicole. Of course she hates children.

    2. Carl, Fighter of the Nightman   10 years ago

      I saw the source article the other day. It expands a bit upon that last point:

      About 97.5% % of the low-risk offenders were offense-free after five years; about 95% were still offense-free after 15 years. Some context can help here. About 3% of felons with no known history of sex offenses commit one within 4.5 years of their release. Of course, they're not on the sex offender registry after release even though the chance of their committing a sex offense is the same or higher than the chance of a new sex offense by a either a low-risk offender, or a high-risk sex offender who has been offense free for fifteen years.

      1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

        Even better. Thanks.

  21. Mrs. Lemuel Struthers   10 years ago

    Worst day for the DOW in 2015 @16,990 -358

    1. Mike M.   10 years ago

      The absurd bubble couldn't last forever.

    2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      Ruh roh. I'm not looking.

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        Eh. I came out ahead today.

        1. Florida Man   10 years ago

          My investment strategy is not looking at the daily numbers. It's the only way to dollar cost average effectively.

          1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

            I have short term and long term. I pretty much leave the long term stuff alone.

            1. Florida Man   10 years ago

              Is your primary job investing? It seems like to do it properly you need to put a lot of time into research to invest short term.

              1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

                No, but I do some very detailed research in a specialized pharmaceutical/biotech field, and that's where most of my active investing is.

              2. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

                My investment strategy is to look and wait for really shitty days for companies that I think can weather the outcome (Ford and BP are two great successes).

                Then stay long term.

  22. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Those NJ cops didn't want to end up like this guy

    According to Boackle, the detective spoke to Janard Cunningham, who was sitting the car. The detective decided to call for backup so that he could continue his robbery investigation while another officer handled the traffic stop.

    While he was calling for backup, Cunningham allegedly exited the car and became aggressive, approaching the detective and repeatedly questioned why he'd been pulled over, the union chief said. The detective considered using force but thought better of it and continued his call when Cunningham hit him, Boackle said.

    Cunningham is accused of then "pistol whipping" the officer with his own service weapon, Boackle said.

    Also-

    Police Chief A.C. Roper sees the episode ? as well as the reaction, including celebratory and vitriolic comments posted online alongside images of the wounded officer ? as symptomatic of a larger problem, in which some don't respect law enforcement.

    "The nobility and integrity of policing has been challenged," Roper said. "As a profession, we have allowed popular culture to draft a narrative which is contrary to the amazing work that so many officers are doing everyday across this nation."

    1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      Scott Greenfield and Popehat both wrote about how much BS the police chief's reaction is.

    2. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

      Yeah, amazing work, like assaulting and kidnapping people who haven't harmed anyone! GO COPS!

  23. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Those poor, poor cops. Why don't the peasants respect kowtow in terror to them?

  24. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

    Lesson = There's a right way, and a wrong way to try to convince people not to kill themselves.

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      If you attend the University of Hawaii and are still depressed enough to kill yourself, you probably should.

      1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

        Spoken like someone who didn't grow up in Hawaii.

        1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          Touche. I haven't seen the seedy underbelly.

          1. Florida Man   10 years ago

            If you've ever had to do a fire walk to defend your sisters honor... You might be a red neck Hawaiian.

  25. SamDod598   10 years ago

    Wow I didnt even know he was still alive.

    http://www.Total-Privacy.tk

    1. Enough About Woodchippers   10 years ago

      Then you must not know the he and Lou Reed are spending a lot of time in the recording studio lately. Expect big things.

    2. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

      Jeez Anon-Bot, you're almost as bad as Mike M.

  26. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Dow down 2%? I'm not going to jump off the roof, just yet.

    1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      It surprises me--probably shouldn't--how much of a big deal the press makes over triple-digit movements in points. Kinda silly when the Dow is in the 16,000-17,000 range. It's a silly index to follow, anyway.

  27. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

    Momma of Guy Who Keeps Insisting He's Actually Black Says, "Nuh Uh"

    1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

      I guess it's really only an issue because he accepted a scholarship that Oprah gives out based partly on the color of the applicant's skin?

      1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

        Or maybe his momma is trying to cover up the one time she went black, but decided to come back?

        1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

          Yeah, reading the story earlier, that was in the back of my mind. I knew a married couple, both very blond, who had what was obviously a mixed race child. The mother kept dyeing the boy's hair blond, but to no avail. She worked in a magistrate's office and the lad's real father was a black state trooper. The marriage didn't last long after.

          1. RBS   10 years ago

            state trooper.

            Unforgivable.

          2. Tejicano   10 years ago

            You've heard of "the long arm of the law"? Maybe that's not the only part of the law that's long.

      2. Antilles   10 years ago

        Just imagine how much more successful he would've been if he'd stayed white.

      3. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

        He routinely did media interviews speaking on behalf of the entire black-race and their deep feelings re: Ferguson.

        He also specifically claimed his pappy was a black man who left his family (when his birth certificate says its a white man in jail), and he was beaten as a child for being Black in a white-dominated world

        I don't begrudge the guy the right to adopt whatever identity he wants. But I find it hard for people like him to lecture about 'White Privilege' while actively misrepresenting his own background and trying to gin up some kind of fake-narrative of "oppression".

        There's also the little issue of him being a seeming scam-artist who's got a trail of dubious "Charity Fundraising Efforts" with zero actual audit for what happened with raised funds.

        1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

          He also specifically claimed his pappy was a black man who left his family (when his birth certificate says its a white man in jail), and he was beaten as a child for being Black in a white-dominated world

          Like I said, there are witnesses saying the beating happened as described, it's just that other witnesses and the police report disagree.

          Could the cops have covered that shit up? I guess, but the resulting lawsuit would have been a motherfucking windfall. Sue the school and the attackers and the local police department for their part in the cover up of a racist assault? Oh, yes please.

      4. Enough About Woodchippers   10 years ago

        Theft by fraud.

    2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

      My question is about the alleged beating. The report says no gang beating occurred, multiple witnesses say no gang beating occurred, but then there are other witnesses who say it was a gang beating and he was hospitalized with serious injuries.

      This should be easy to prove, right? Why doesn't king release information proving it occurred as he said? There have to be pictures or something, right?

      And is he alleging that the police department in his community purposefully falsified a report to cover up a gang beating? Because that's a major accusation and we should know if cops down there are doing that shit.

      1. Antilles   10 years ago

        He doesn't need to literally be beaten for him to be assaulted. Perhaps he was 'pummeled' by disapproving looks from people with negative thoughts. That's literally the same as assault and how dare you dismiss the ordeal this poor guy has been through!

    3. Carl, Fighter of the Nightman   10 years ago

      This morning the Daily Caller reported that black conservative group Black Conservatives Fund PAC has offered to donate $25,000 to Black Lives Matter if King can prove that his father is black or if he agrees to a DNA test.

      Epic trolling.

      I really want a time machine so I can go back to the 60s and blow their minds with this shit. And Internet porn.

      1. Libertymike   10 years ago

        If you did, Al Gore would tell you that he had already conceived of internet porn after he had invented the internet.

      2. mad.casual   10 years ago

        I really want a time machine so I can go back to the 60s and blow their minds with this shit. And Internet porn.

        The 60s, the 50s, the 20s, the Old West... go back and blow their minds with the twisted and disgusting lengths we will torture their ethos and causes.

        This should be No. 2 in '1,000 Ways to Fuck With Time Before You Die' right behind Killing Hitler.

        1. Carl, Fighter of the Nightman   10 years ago

          I will also let them know that schoolchildren will be taught that John F. Kennedy and hippies are responsible for every bit of cultural and political progress made during the decade.

  28. Free Society   10 years ago

    A grand jury has decided not to indict two New Jersey police officers who opened fire and killed a suspect who threatened them by ? stepping out of his car with his hands raised in surrender.

    Of course not. Cops can't murder people in the same way that non-white minorities can't be racist.

    Prosecutors say Days fired seven shots and Worley fired once. The shooting lasted approximately 2 seconds and Reid was hit in the chest and left arm, according to prosecutors. Days is black, Worley is white and Reid was black.

    Well that certainly clears things up. This makes an all important difference in the forensics, motivations and circumstances. Because as we all know, white killers are more killery and black victims are more victimy. Good journalism.

    1. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

      If the cop who shot seven times is black, it will be tougher to whip up the rioters.

      Which doesn't mean the shooting was justified, I wasn't there.

      The grand jury, however, looked into it and found no crime. Of course we're supposed to assume grand juries are corrupt and stupid, etc. etc. when they don't make the "right" decision.

      1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

        Not corrupt... but definitely the other one.

        1. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

          How do we know this?

          1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

            Not smart enough to get out of jury duty.

            1. Lord at War   10 years ago

              If smart people avoid jury duty, who is left?

    2. Michael   10 years ago

      I wouldn't at all be surprised if proglodytes soon begin decrying the marksmanship achievement gap.

  29. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

    Random facebook derp: regarding the possibility that the pedestrian plaza in Times Square will be shut down over the topless woman, some idiot adds, "We should be talking about closing down the rest of Broadway to traffic."

    I... I really don't know if this guy is saying that the entirety of Broadway should be converted to pedestrian space or not. I don't know if I want to find out.

    1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      Looks like that's exactly what he's saying.

      Then again, I know people who think all of Midtown should be closed to vehicular traffic except for cabs and public transportation.

    2. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

      There's no congestion in NYC. I don't see what the problem is.

      1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

        You only have congestion because of car. Fewer car streets - fewer cars - less congestion. SCIENCE!

        Also Jane Jacobs Sprawl Density Livable Sustainable! Begone foul Four-Stroke Satan!

    3. Rhywun   10 years ago

      The NY Post is going on one of its patented crusades to return cars to Times Square, as if it was tolerable back then.

      Me, I think it's pretty reasonable to suggest that areas where gazillions of pedestrians congregate ought to be pedestrianized. In the old days, you had to walk in the street because there was no room for everyone on the sidewalks.

  30. RBS   10 years ago

    OT: I'm dealing with an attorney who thinks it's fun to waste my time. I am going to get a default judgment against her client because she's not only wasting my time but acting in bad faith. I just sent her email telling to her to submit a settlement offer in writing or else. She then gave 2 phone numbers that are disconnected and apparently the number on her website doesn't work either. So the 4th number worked and the conversation went like this:

    RBS: Do you have an offer?
    Her: Well, kind of, but I have to see what my client want to do.
    RBS: So, no.
    Her: Can I call you back?
    RBS: You have ten minutes

    1. RBS   10 years ago

      For the record, I do not enjoy holding other attorneys in default but I have been pretty generous with the extra time to file an answer.

      1. Libertymike   10 years ago

        When was the complaint served?

        Did you memorialize the extension to file a responsive pleading?

        What is the gravamen of your client's claim(s)?

        Have you had any experience dealing with the defendant's counsel?

        Did she meet the 10 minute deadline you imposed?

        How often have you had to deal with a defaulted party seeking to set aside a default?

        Don't mind me, I'm just a naturally full of questions - but not nosy.

    2. The Last American Hero   10 years ago

      Carly Rae Jepsen is an attorney?

    3. Karl Hungus   10 years ago

      OT: I'm dealing with an attorney--

      It's the P.M. Links, so there's no such thing as OT. It's basically a free for all here.

      RBS: You have ten minutes

      It's been 10 minutes, did you get your call back?

      1. RBS   10 years ago

        Of course not. Oh well. Sucks for her client though.

        1. Rich   10 years ago

          "Good Morning, Ms. Attorney. I'm Sue Yursorriaz from Channel 4 News, and ...."

  31. Enough About Woodchippers   10 years ago

    The site for the impending Burning Man festival is infested with swarms of stinkbugs, but organizers are hoping they'll be gone by the end of the month when crowds the human stinkbugs show up.

    1. RBS   10 years ago

      The Burning Man episode of the Malcom in the Middle is great.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        Watching it on Netflix as we speak. So far, so good.

  32. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    A crash.

    Over the weekend, the events were covered by the newspapers across the United States. On October 28, "Black Monday",[12] more investors facing margin calls decided to get out of the market, and the slide continued with a record loss in the Dow for the day of 38.33 points, or 13%.

    The next day, "Black Tuesday", October 29, 1929, about 16 million shares traded as the panic selling reached its crescendo. Some stocks actually had no buyers at any price that day ("air pockets"). The Dow lost an additional 30 points, or 12 percent,[13][14][15] amid rumors that U.S. President Herbert Hoover would not veto the pending Smoot?Hawley Tariff Act.[16] The volume of stocks traded on October 29, 1929 was a record that was not broken for nearly 40 years.[14]

    On October 29, William C. Durant joined with members of the Rockefeller family and other financial giants to buy large quantities of stocks to demonstrate to the public their confidence in the market, but their efforts failed to stop the large decline in prices. Due to the massive volume of stocks traded that day, the ticker did not stop running until about 7:45 p.m. that evening. The market had lost over $30 billion in the space of two days which included $14 billion on October 29 alone.[17]

    1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      Interestingly, Black Monday in 1987 didn't really have much economic effect, not like other market crashes. And that was a 23% sing-day drop here and much worse in some other countries.

      1. Paul.   10 years ago

        Because it was incredibly short lived, and the fed didn't purchase 900 trillion in securities to prop it back up.

        1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          It amazes me that people take all of this smoke and mirrors seriously. It;s not just delaying the inevitable; I think it's going to ensure an even more terrible crash. And with interest rates being shit, along with some trepidation about real estate as an investment, not to mention the huge percentage of retirement dollars in stock. . .we're in for really bad times if a major crash occurs. The whole scam will be exposed.

          1. egould310 reppin' LBC   10 years ago

            Trepidation about real estate as an investment?

            1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

              With a new bubble going? Of course. Getting in and out during the bubble, sure, but how much are you going to risk longer term knowing we're going to see another bubble burst?

              1. egould310 reppin' LBC   10 years ago

                Oh. You mean Buying a SFR as a personal residence and calling it an investment. Personal residences aren't assets, they are liabililities, therefore they are not investments.

                On the other hand, multi-family and apartment buildings are a great asset class to buy right now. And if the real estate market as a whole takes a dip, I would recommend buying multi-family/apartments. I'll be gobbling up all that I can.

                1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

                  I agree. I was talking about for average investors who, at best, have a residential money-sucker and maybe a single rental property.

  33. Warty   10 years ago

    Sheffield Lawyer Busted For Hypnotizing Clients Into Sex Acts Has Officially Resigned

    Hypnosis can't make someone do something they don't want to do, right? I'm like 80% sure that I read that somewhere.

    1. Paul.   10 years ago

      Yeah, this is like being poisoned by homeopathic remedies!

    2. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      You didn't read that, you were hypnotized into believing it.

    3. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

      ""Hypnosis can't make someone do something they don't want to do, right?"

      Most people enjoy sex.

      Its just they'd prefer it to be with Someone Hot and Famous rather than "you".

    4. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

      Lawyers aren't supposed to screw their clients* - hypnotized or not.

      *except metaphorically

  34. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

    I don't understand the Carter hate.

    In the grand scheme of things, how was Carter a worse president than 90% of the other people we've had? A lot of the things that fucked up the economy under Carter (price controls, for example) were actually implemented by Nixon and Carter repealed them when it became obvious what a catastrophe they were. He also deregulated trucking and is responsible for the craft beer renaissance.

    1. Paul.   10 years ago

      Yeah, Carter, in the end was merely mediocre. Which unfortunately now means "didn't do enough". Given the modern context, I'll take Mediocre over Effective every time.

    2. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      I think people have a bigger problem with his positions since his presidency than with his mediocrity as president.

      I don't hate him, but he's not my favorite politician by a long shot, either.

      1. Paul.   10 years ago

        If Carter were to be recycled today, he'd probably be more like Bernie Sanders.

      2. RBS   10 years ago

        For me, and this is pretty much how I feel about all politicians, it's he's out of office so shut the fuck up already.

        1. Paul.   10 years ago

          But how would we know what politicians really believed?

    3. The Hyperbole   10 years ago

      I think it' an age thing, my father and his friends (late 60's early 70's) hate Carter with a vitriol normally reserved for card cheats and puppy fuckers. I think they were at the exact right age that the dismal economy really affected them.

      1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        It's also one of the reasons Reagan is revered by many who were adults during that time. The change was pretty dramatic--almost instant in the foreign policy arena and fairly quickly with the economy. Not that it was all Reagan, of course, or even mostly him, but he gets a lot of the credit and Carter a lot of the blame.

    4. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

      I think it's because Carter ended up as a symbol of "managed decline" on this end of Atlantic, as "winter of discontent" was in UK. He came across as a mealy-mouthed hand wringer who couldn't see any way to make things better, only less bad. Then you get Reagan (or Thatcher) saying "no, wait, fuck that, YOU are the one screwing up, not the rest of the country" and doing much better.

      1. lap83   10 years ago

        "only less bad."

        Really? I think his foreign policy is widely considered to have made things worse by people who actually look at the consequences of his "achievements". (like getting someone to sign a treaty is a success in and of itself, even if they get assassinated because of it)

        1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

          Oh, yes, what I mean is, his goal was to make the slope of decline lower. Not that he even succeded at that - fuck, Camp David was forged by two actual statesmen (Sadat and Begin), he mostly was around to hold their hands and demonstrate that Egypt has switched sides for real.

      2. Red Rocks Rockin   10 years ago

        He wasn't a horrible president in the grand scheme of things, but he was the wrong guy at the wrong time. He was essentially a moderate Democrat at a time when the New Left had just taken over his party--the shitlib Boomers who wanted to make the US feel guilty about everything in its history and kill off the post-WW2 culture of civic Americanism, but still somehow expected the country to remain prosperous economically while they tore it apart culturally. He didn't know how to manage the geo-political and geo-economic changes affecting the country, and essentially conceded the narrative that the US was on the decline as a result. That's not someone who's going to give the impression of strength, which most Americans outside the Boomer hippies were looking for at the time.

        Reagan's greatest accomplishment, to be honest, was reviving the "America, Fuck Yeah!" ethos of the early-mid 20th Century and riding that to two terms in office.

        1. Tejicano   10 years ago

          Nothing underlined the difference between Carter and Reagan, geo-politically, more than the Iranians returning the embassy hostages on the day Reagan took office.

          1. CatoTheChipper   10 years ago

            Reagan also had the balls to fire the air traffic controllers and to decontrol oil on the domestic front.

            I intensely disliked Carter at the time because he froze my salary while prices were going up by around 15% per year and was the living embodiment of American malaise. More recently, I've mellowed regarding Carter after seeing just how bad presidents could be with Read My Lips Bush, The Meaning of Is Clinton, Compassionate Conservative Bush, and Hope'n'Change Obama. To Carter's credit, he leadership brought about legalization of homebrewing and deregulation of trucking and air travel.

    5. Mike M.   10 years ago

      Carter allowed innocent Americans to be held hostage by a hostile power for 444 days.

      I know that in an age where nobody give a shit about anything except drugs, Twitter, selfies, and gay butt sex it probably seems laughable that people would actually care about fellow Americans that they never ever met, but believe it or not, back then people still had some pride about such things. I know, it's shocking.

      1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        To be fair, our fear of Soviet response colored our behavior quite a bit. I always thought one of the reasons the rescue fiasco was authorized was that the Russians had just invaded Afghanistan.

      2. Warty   10 years ago

        Whine harder. WHINE, YOKEL, WHINE

      3. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

        I know that in an age where nobody give a shit about anything except drugs, Twitter, selfies, and gay butt sex it probably seems laughable that people would actually care about fellow Americans that they never ever met, but believe it or not, back then people still had some pride about such things. I know, it's shocking.

        I could not possibly have written a paragraph explaining why I hate you that would have been more instructive than this pile of bullshit you just posted.

        Mike M's father in 1977:

        I know that in an age where nobody gives a shit about anything except cocaine, disco, The Gong Show, The Love Boat, and gay butt sex (some things are popular in all generations) it probably seems laughable that people would actually care about fellow Americans that they've never met, but believe it or not, back in Korea people still had some pride about such things.

        1. Warty   10 years ago

          Too many faggoty words, Nancy boy. WRITE, COSMO, WRITE

          1. Trshmnstr doesn't recycle   10 years ago

            NEEDS MOAR BITCHING ABOUT DC COCKTAIL PARTIEZZZZ!!!

          2. Trshmnstr doesn't recycle   10 years ago

            NEEDS MOAR BITCHING ABOUT DC COCKTAIL PARTIEZZZZ!!!

        2. John Titor   10 years ago

          This is the generation who collectively flipped its shit over a half-decade ended central African civil war, a bunch of Nigerian nutbags and an African lion. Collectively pretending to give a shit for social recognition is more common than ever.

          Oh, but no one did that in Mike M's day, I'm sure. *Stuffs away Ayatollah and Free Tibet shirts*

    6. Tejicano   10 years ago

      At a point where America really needed a leader (post-Vietnam, economy in the toilet, Soviets in A'stan, Teheran embassy over-run, etc) he just kinda looked down at his shoes, kicked a dirt clod, and mumbled.

      1. Tejicano   10 years ago

        A particular sore point with me was how Carter said, in reference to the planned Holocaust museum, that we would never again stand by while genocide was being committed - when the Khmer Rouge were doing exactly that.

        1. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

          I don't have much of an opinion about Carter as a person (though policies can be debated)

          Though i always thought this was funny.

          Good Diplomacy? = Does not mean what you think it means.

          Those people shaking hands? Will both be murdered by citizens of their own respective countries in the next few years.

          1. Tejicano   10 years ago

            Carter's "attack rabbit" incident was cosmic comedy ne plus ultima

            1. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

              "Carter's "attack rabbit" incident "

              I was too young. I remember carter on TV and i thought he sounded dull and indecisive. My mom was southern, but he sounded straight up goofy Georgian.

              Reagan was the first president I was actually cognizant of. Partly because people had strong opinions about him +/-, and because the Cold War was something very prominent in people's consciousness, and he was going to "do something about it" in a way no prior president seemed willing.

          2. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

            *my bad. Rabin, not Begin, was assassinated. meh. still, the point's basically the same. leaders can't do deals that citizens won't accept.

          3. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

            Well, Sadat was assassinated by Muslim Brotherhood, so yeah, when your opponents are fucking religious assholes that can't be compromised with, you might get shot if you piss them off. Especially if at the same time you say "Fuck pan-Arabism, maybe we should take care of Egypt."

            Have I mentioned I think Sadat is the greates Arab statesman since the actual Caliphate? Not a nice person, but damn, he actually did do the "long-term plan to deshittify your country's situation" thing better than most. Takes a talent to turn defeat on the battlefield into strategic victory!

            1. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

              "Sadat was assassinated by Muslim Brotherhood"

              Actually.... it was the "The Egyptian Islamic Group"...collaborating with "Egyptian Islamic Jihad". The former eventually became a normal political party, while the latter went on to merge with Al Qaeda.

              "While the assassination of the Egyptian president Anwar Sadat in 1981 is generally thought to have been carried out by another Islamist group, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, some have suggested al-Gamaa was responsible for or at least related to the assassination. In 2003 the imprisoned leadership of the group renounced bloodshed, and a series of high-ranking members have since been released by Egyptian authorities..."

              You have to remember that muslim political parties were basically banned in Egypt, but that multiple different groups flourished underground in a kind of shadow-political system.

              The idea that the "Muslim brotherhood" are some kind of regional super-baddies is generally mistaken - they're actually the less extremist of the islamic political groups, and have been relatively sane (as far as i know) compared to say, Hamas/Hezbollah or groups that have openly advocated terrorism.

              Read "The Looming Tower"... its basically a backgrounder on Al Q, but squeezes in a very good history of middle-east politics and islamic terrorism (vs palestinian nationalist terrorism)

        2. Tejicano   10 years ago

          I will admit that my opinion of Carter has a strong personal facet. I was in the Marines during most of his term in office and it was exasperating to train so hard just to end up warming the bench while so much was happening around the world.

    7. Leigh   10 years ago

      Fucker brought back select service registration and no one has yet to repeal it.

    8. 0x90   10 years ago

      My hate for Carter is no greater than for any other president.

    9. Lord at War   10 years ago

      Have you ever heard, "You can't buy gas today because of the last digit of your license plate"?

      That was Jimmy Carter.

  35. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Carter was one of the "least worst" President of my adult life.

  36. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Black Monday in 1987 didn't really have much economic effect

    I remember Buffett coming out and saying, (more or less) "It's just a number. All the people, all the machines, all the inventory... everything is still there. Everybody's going to show up for work tomorrow, and the real economy will be okay."
    That was ten. Who knows what sort of gibberish he'd spout, now?

    1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      He got his, and now he wants to make sure no one else ever does. Fuck you.

      What's crazy is that we lived through that, saw the odd disconnect between Wall Street and Main Street, yet hear all the time today that a bull market means GREATEST ECONOMY EVER, when that's a very big lie.

      1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

        Well, we hear that all the time because Shriek is here to make that claim over and over and over.

        1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          He's just repeating a very foolish leftwing talking point.

  37. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    My investment strategy is to look and wait for really shitty days for companies that I think can weather the outcome (Ford and BP are two great successes).
    .
    Yes. I used to troll the "52 week low" list. Northrop was my big winner. I did pretty well with GE, as much as I dislike Immelt.
    I should go back to doing that.

    1. Paul.   10 years ago

      I've done the same thing. Only to find that the 52 week low was just a point on the ride down...

      1. Paul.   10 years ago

        *cough*GulfMark*cough*

  38. Paul.   10 years ago

    Suuure the fed is going to raise rates. What with the runaway economy and bubbles appearing everywhere!

    http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/20.....fears.html

    1. Paul.   10 years ago

      The S&P 500 fell 2.1 percent to 2035, wiping out what was left of its 2015 gains, and the 10-year Treasury yield was around 2.07 percent.

      Shrike! Does your ass hurt?

  39. Trshmnstr doesn't recycle   10 years ago

    Well, I'm on day 4 of on campus interviews... I've never had interviewers spend so little time on my resume. For most, there is a cursory rundown of my history followed by "what do you want to ask us?" Some of this may be because of the 20 minute limit, but I find the format of 5 minutes about the candidate and 15 minutes of "do you have any more questions for us?" to be a bit off-putting.

    I thought it may be that my credentials weren't there, but it has been made increasingly clear that the issue isn't that I'm unqualified (3 offers and 2 callbacks so far). Is this just a law school hiring thing?

    Whenever I was interviewing engineering intern candidates at my old job, the "what do you want to ask us" was a throw away in the last 5 minutes, in case they had some sort of required accommodations or questions about the hiring process. It certainly threw me for a loop when interviewers have asked me that question with 2/3 of the interview left to go.

    /naive law student

    1. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

      People almost universally think "interviews" are supposed to be about Companies asking questions, and then interviewees "answering them correctly"

      Instead, its about prospective employees having a brief chance to present a self-sales-pitch

      It never even crossed my mind until i was given the job of interviewing 50 prospective applicants for our very-fast-growing company. *also - at least 1 of the people i hired was probably going to be working directly for me.

      I stopped caring about what their resume said, and would just go, "what on this piece of paper should I care about, as relates to what I need?" The implication wasn't "tell me about the paper-claims", but rather, "what do you think i want? how much have you thought about this."

      As far as the questions, i dont know what law firms look for, but being aggressive about your interest in personal advancement is generally a good sign. "how much flexibility should i expect", "what kind of deals/cases make up your workload" "how many partners came from within the firm, vs. poached?" "what kind of churn do you get? (how long do hires last)" "why do you present a better opportunity for me than (competing firm)"
      etc.

      The most important thing to convince an interviewer is that you want THEIR job. (not the HR person, but you want to be their boss. ...that you see your time as valuable and that you don't want to waste it for some bullshit firm that's going to make you do pointless busy work)

      1. *GILMORE*   10 years ago

        One question that amazed me how candidates seemed to never expect it.....

        "I get you want A job. Why do you want THIS job"

        The people i hired were the ones who knew some few details about the company, what we did, how fast we were growing, and who our clients were. They said,

        "I'd rather kick ass at a place where I can get promoted fast and do interesting stuff, rather than get some bullshit low-level job at McKinsey or PwC and end up never moving beyond my cubicle for 4 years"

        Their interest in specific subject matter we dealt with, and their interest in the type of workplace environment we presented were sincere. They knew what other companies were like, and they didn't like THAT, they liked THIS. They wanted to get experience in specific skills and subject matter that they thought would be valuable in the longer term.

        If you can find ways to communicate this quickly to your prospects, they'll make you offers.

        1. Paul.   10 years ago

          "I get you want A job. Why do you want THIS job"

          An excellent question. After finding myself unemployed for the first time in 29 years, then slowly getting back into the workforce, I found that I really didn't want any of the jobs I was applying for, I just needed A job. Once I finally hit THE job I wanted, I nailed that mofo.

        2. lap83   10 years ago

          Also, asking questions to impress the employer is only a part of it. You should also be trying to discern if they're the right fit for you.

      2. Trshmnstr doesn't recycle   10 years ago

        People almost universally think "interviews" are supposed to be about Companies asking questions, and then interviewees "answering them correctly"

        This is exactly how we hired at [insert tech company here]. A senior coworker and I would tag-team an interviewee with questions that were either technical in nature or based off of their resume. Half of our shtick was trying to bounce them off of their canned responses to see whether they could actually think on their feet, or whether they were just hacks.

        I certainly use the open forum to my advantage. I really like some of the questions that you propose, and I'll probably steal a couple for tomorrow. The questions I ask are generally about what sort of development they would expect out of me/how will they develop my talents, information about the work environment/work-life balance, and information about opportunities to relocate (because my wife and I are seriously considering moving after I graduate).

        It's amazing how much you can get a partner at a law firm to (mildly) trash their own firm if you just sit there in silence and make them fill the gaps (to a certain extent. silence can kill you if not well timed).

        1. Paul.   10 years ago

          A senior coworker and I would tag-team an interviewee

          Phrasing...

          1. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

            Did somebody say "Tag Team"?

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffCEr327W44

  40. Dr. Jonathan Crane   10 years ago

    Anyone else watch O'Reilly last night completely make up a SCOTUS case to defend birthright citizenship?

    1. Paul.   10 years ago

      No, but I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night!

  41. John C. Randolph   10 years ago

    I haven't been a fan of Jimmy Carter since he re-instituted draft registration back when I was in high school. Fuck that guy.

    -jcr

    1. Tejicano   10 years ago

      I never had to register having been to young when it was discontinued and then already enlisted when it was brought back.

  42. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    Back to normal. I did the equivalent of dropping a nuke on it, and the side effects are probably worse.

  43. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

    Are you back from vacation?

  44. DEG   10 years ago

    At least your ear is better. That's progress right?

  45. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    Yeah. Flew back yesterday with an ear infection. Very unpleasant.

  46. Ivan Pike   10 years ago

    "The father was a strong and tall man.

    Could he swim? If so, why didn't he go in after her?

  47. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

    The father was a strong and tall man.

    Then why didn't he save her himself?

  48. Tejicano   10 years ago

    They should have thrown him in to save her himself whether he could swim or not.

  49. grrizzly   10 years ago

    The only time I had an ear infection was on a trip to Miami Beach. Hanging out at the Mount Sinai Medical Center all Friday night. Good times. Anyway, the first bout of sharp pain occurred just when the plane started its descent to FLL, so I empathize with you.

  50. Rich   10 years ago

    "I *told you* 'I prefer my daughter being dead than being touched by a strange man!'"

  51. Rich   10 years ago

    Yes. Yes, it is.

  52. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

    How' the old grade-school routine go?

    I cunt hear you, I've got an ear in-fuck-shun.

  53. Paul.   10 years ago

    Don't get smart.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!