When Rules Multiply, the World Needs Rule Breakers
Breaking the rules can lead to innovations.

Humans need rules. Rules make life more predictable. But when the rules multiply, the world needs some rule-breakers.
The creator of the underground website Silk Road, Ross Ulbricht, was sentenced to life in prison for creating an online space that allowed people to use bitcoins to buy and sell things. Some used Silk Road (named after Marco Polo's trading route from China) to sell illegal drugs. People do that anyway, even without Silk Road; since the site's closing, numerous similar websites have taken its place.
The prosecution implied (but never really argued) that Ulbricht planned murders. That would certainly be breaking a basic rule of civilization, but Ulbricht claims that wasn't what he was up to—he just wanted to let other people engage in peaceful transactions.
If Ulbricht was telling the truth, then the world that rule-breakers like him envision is less creepy and dangerous than the government-run world in which we live now. Government enforces its rules with guns, and government force keeps increasing.
So I'm glad that today there are Rule Breaker Awards, sponsored by Sage, Nextiva and Infusionsoft, given to entrepreneurs who make the world a better place by breaking rules.
Mike Michalowicz co-hosted the awards. Inspired by a pumpkin farmer who dedicated his life solely to growing giant pumpkins, Mike wrote a book called "The Pumpkin Plan" in which he discourages people from assuming that the way everyone else does something must be the best way.
One of this year's Rule Breaker Award recipients is Alex Esposito, whose Free Ride shuttle service offers exactly that -- free rides in New York State, Florida, San Diego and elsewhere, made possible by the low operating cost of Esposito's little electric buses and by local businesses advertising on the vehicles.
I assumed offering free rides would not be a sustainable business, but I guess I just think in conventional terms. Apparently, the opportunity to advertise makes all sorts of neat services profitable—including TV, of course.
Esposito's Free Ride idea seems so simple in retrospect it's hard to believe no one else was doing it. It takes a rule-breaker to notice a different way to do things.
Government, with its recourse to guns and jails, imposes the worst rules. But corporate culture can be dumb, too. Ricardo Semler is a CEO who decided to break the usual rules of corporate decorum.
At age 21, he took over Semco, a family business in Brazil. Semler promptly threw out all sorts of rules.
There would be no dress code. No one would check expenses. "Spend what you need to, and the company trusts you."
There would be no storeroom padlocks or audits of petty-cash accounts for veteran employees—people who'd grown to be trusted by Semco. Workers would come and go according to their own schedules. They would even choose their salaries and their own supervisors!
This makes no sense to me, and I'm sure control freaks in human resources departments (Semco has no HR department) had heart attacks. Ricardo's ideas sounded absurd by normal business standards, but it was a big boost to morale, and the company has done well. Even during Brazil's recession, profits increased 500 percent. Sales grew from a few million dollars per year to more than a billion dollars.
Business people and government regulators often make the mistake of assuming that the world we live in is one in which the best practices have been pretty much figured out. Better not rock the boat—or it might all fall apart.
Then, along come some totally new ways of doing things. FedEx turned out to be much better than the U.S. Postal Service, teens ignore Hollywood and become rich and famous on YouTube, people skip hotels and find rooms via Airbnb and so on. Who knows what discoveries await if we don't let tired old rules get in the way?
COPYRIGHT 2015 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Do you know who else breaks rules?
Donald Trump?
I was going to say Hillary Clinton, but rules don't apply to her, so she can't really break them, can she?
PHAKE SKANDUL!!!!111!!11!!!!!!!!
Hillary Clinton, oh wait, rules or laws?
What difference, at this point, does it make?
Dude, that was like two years ago.
Is Reason going to bond me out after I break these rules?
Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go? to tech tab for work detail,,,,,,,
http://www.homejobs90.com
Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
This is wha- I do...... ?????? http://www.online-jobs9.com
Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8596 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...
http://www.jobnet10.com
"FedEx turned out to be much better than the U.S. Postal Service"
Surprisingly, this is not always the case. FedEx and DHL etc are large centralized companies with no knowledge of the local streets, roads or houses. If an address doesn't exist in their database, they can't deliver. The Post Office on the other hand has the local knowledge and can deliver post to informal or unofficial addresses like mine.
Strange thing--I tried to send a paper check for a few hundred bucks to a New York City travel agent, via DHL and FEDEX from here in Veracruz, MEXICO. They would NOT do it! The clerks did not know the reason. I finally sent the check by regular Mexico Post Office--no problem, no questions.
" Mexico Post Office-"
Despite its terrible reputation I've never had a problem with it. A visit to the Post Office itself is like a visit to a Post Office of Communist China or Russia. There are no computers and the clerk I dealt with pecked away with one finger at a manual typewriter.