Movie Review: The Man from U.N.C.L.E.
Henry Cavill and Armie Hammer in a boneheaded sub-Bond caper.


It's hard to imagine Hollywood's most-prized action-movie demographic—teenage boys—getting very excited about The Man from U.N.C.L.E. The picture is based on an old TV series that went off the air 47 years ago. It's set in 1963, at the height of something called the Cold War. And it continually references James Bond films of ancient provenance.
You don't have to be a teenager to be bored by this movie, however. The plot, co-concocted by director Guy Ritchie, is a generic muddle (nuclear menace, Nazi gold, evil neo-fascists), and the picture's narrative confusion, coupled with mindless dialogue and sprinklings of fizzled wit, is a challenge to endure. Additionally unhelpful are the lead actors, who give the impression of having only met just before the cameras started rolling.
Reliably wooden Henry Cavill (Man of Steel) plays Napoleon Solo, a quippy art thief turned CIA agent. Armie Hammer (The Lone Ranger), deploying a glutinous Russian accent that's pure Boris Badenov, is broody KGB agent Illya Kuryakin. Lucklessly inserted between these two is Alicia Vikander, the graceful robot girl of Ex Machina, here cast as an East German auto mechanic. Right away we know we're not in good hands.
Vikander's character, Gaby Teller, is the daughter of an ex-Nazi rocket scientist recently surfaced in Rome, where he's fallen into the clutches of the scheming Vinciguerra family, plotters of world domination. Solo pries Gaby out of East Berlin with Ilya in frantic pursuit. Shortly after, he is informed that in the interest of foiling the Vinciguerras, the Soviets have okayed a one-time team-up of the perma-smirking American agent and the lunkish Illya. Soon all three decamp for Italy.
The Man from U.N.C.L.E. TV show, which aired from 1964 to 1968, was a riff on the early Bond films (it debuted the same month that Goldfinger launched a worldwide Bond-mania). Ritchie preserves that aspect of the show. At one point we see a hotel-room door cutely numbered "707," in the familiar 007 font. At another there's a mention of "Count Lippe," a character in Thunderball. But these nudging Bond references serve only to remind us of the sleek, breezy style of those old movies, something of which Ritchie—best known for showboating split screens and thunderous soundtracks—seems incapable.
The director manages one nifty action sequence, involving a truck and a boat and a bottle of wine, but is otherwise dedicated to the usual thug-punching and automotive chases. He also has an unfortunate enthusiasm for anachronistic lines ("I'm outta here!") and unfunny jokes ("Inside every Kraut there's an American trying to get out"). And there's an odd homoerotic undertow between the two agents. Cavill, who has the smoothly sculpted features of a department-store mannequin, projects a neutered romantic presence, and Hammer maintains a stubborn resistance to Gaby's obvious carnal come-ons. The scene in which these two snip at each other about women's clothing makes no sense in terms of the characters, since their flirty relationship never plays out. And while Vikander, whose snappy spirit recalls the late Romy Schneider, does all she can with Ritchie's occasional attempts at giddy farce (another of his non-specialties), she can't salvage them on her own.
The movie suffers most whenever Hugh Grant puts in an appearance, playing a crisp British spymaster. Grant is so effortlessly stylish—so genuinely breezy—that he exposes Ritchie's picture as the hapless pastiche that it is. James Bond will always be back. I think it's safe to say that Solo and Kuryakin—despite a limp tease at the end—won't.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
great
Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8596 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...
http://www.incomereport.tk
"Napoleon Solo"... There's an Oscar for worst character name in that.
That's too bad about the movie. I read the novels based on the series back in my teens and loved them, even though I had never watched the series. I just recently started watching the old TV show, and it's pretty good.
I really liked this movie. Maybe because I'm not a teen-aged boy? I have an appreciation for style? I'm sick and tired of mindless super-hero flicks and CGI? I don't hate Guy Ritchie, as apparently you do?
^^^^Written uptalk.^^^^ Is there an emoticon for vocal fry?
That photo confuses me. I would have bet money that Illya was the catcher.
Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8596 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...
http://www.jobnet10.com
The picture is based on an old TV series that went off the air 47 years ago.
Yes, I'm getting old.
I think it's safe to say that Solo and Kuryakin?despite a limp tease at the end?won't.
Not a safe bet. The only folks in Hollywood doing new stories are at Pixar.
The Man from U.N.C.L.E. movie is all man (2 and 1 woman) and NO ?U.N.C.L.E. Except for the title and the names of the characters and, I believe 3 seconds of the theme heard over a car radio, there is nothing at all any fan of the old TV series would recognize. Even the anagram is never explained except as a "code word" spoken by "Waverly" ( no first name here). Gabby is revealed to be working for him, but as what and for what is never explained.
As a stand-alone movie, it was OK. Mixing James Bond with USA's White Collar, but with not one ounce of creativity or humor with wooden characters and horrific "60s" costumes. The soundtrack, mostly in Italian (I think) was horrific.
I wasn't expecting much, and I wasn't disappointed. For a true U.N.C.L.E. story that pays homage to all things of the original series, read "Undercover Reunion" by Raven West. Now that's a movie I WOULD pay $15.00 to see.... TWICE!
Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
This is wha- I do...... ?????? http://www.online-jobs9.com
This may be trivial to criticize a review over but-
"Additionally unhelpful are the lead actors, who give the impression of having only met just before the cameras started rolling."
Uh, as I understand things that in universe characters DID pretty much just meet before the cameras started rolling. So... what's the problem? Should people who literally just met behave as though they know each other well?
Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8596 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...
http://www.jobnet10.com
Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8596 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...
http://www.jobnet10.com
Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go? to tech tab for work detail,,,,,,,
http://www.Careersonline10.tk
The TV series was really lame. Maybe making the movie suck was just going for authenticity.
Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
This is wha- I do...... ?????? http://www.online-jobs9.com