Glenn Garvin Reviews The 2000s: A New Reality


"This looks like a rerun of a bad movie and I'm not interested in watching it," George W. Bush snapped during one of the will-he-or-won't-he negotiations over inspections of Saddam Hussein's supposed biochemical and nuclear sites. In National Geographic Channel's two-part documentary series The 2000s: A New Reality, Bush's words become a double entendre, an epitaph not only for the negotiations but the show itself, a stark reminder that we're trapped in a lost decade that's well on its way to two.
That's not to suggest that The 2000s is poorly done, Glenn Garvin explains. Subject to the same caveats that apply to the inevitably shaky attempts to sum up 10 arbitrarily chosen years under a single label, The 2000s does a reasonably good job of weaving a tapestry of the decade's highlights.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?