Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Charleston Shooting

**Updated: Suspected Charleston Shooter Dylann Roof Arrested, Manhunt Over

Evidence mounts for hate crime designation

Robby Soave | 6.18.2015 11:06 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Mugshot and Facebook
(Mugshot and Facebook)

**Update: It's confirmed. Roof was arrested in Shelby, North Carolina.

--

*Update: WBTV News claims Roof was apprehended by police. (Original story is below.)

--

Authorities have identified a 21-year-old Columbia, South Carolina, native as the perpetrator of the horrific attack on the Emanuel AME Church in Charleston last night that left 9 people dead.

The suspect, Dylann Roof, was caught on security camera footage outside the church. He was previously arrested for trespassing on April 26. WISTV.com claims that he was also previously arrested for drug-related charges. He is still at large.

Roof attended White Knoll High School, according to his Facebook page. His profile picture depicts him wearing two patches on his jacket. Twitter users have identified these patches as symbols from apartheid-era South Africa and Rhodesia, an unrecognized nation that rebelled against black majority rule.

Emanuel AME is a historically black church. Roof opened fire during a Bible study meeting around 9 p.m. on Wednesday after sitting and waiting for an hour. He told one woman he was sparing her so that she could "spread the word." According to NBC News:

Sylvia Johnson, a cousin of church shooting victim Pastor Clementa Pinckney says she spoke with one of the survivors "and she said that he had reloaded five different times… and he just said 'I have to do it. You rape our women and you're taking over our country. And you have to go.'"

Rev. Clementa C. Pinckney—a civil rights activist and state senator—was killed during the shooting, along with two other men and six women.

The attack is considered a hate crime.

Facebook

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Context of the Church Massacre

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Charleston ShootingViolenceCrimeSouth CarolinaCharleston
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (239)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

    This wasn't a hate crime. This was an overabundance of passion.

    Over/under on the freak killing himself during the inevitable standoff?

    1. tarran   10 years ago

      My guess is he won't.

      He went to that church intending to murder the people within. HE spent an hour with them before doing it. It might be that he was savoring the moment. Or it might be that he was nerving himself up to shoot them.

      My guess is that he won't kill himself, but will surrender and become a cause celebre for the stormfront crowd.

      1. JFree   10 years ago

        Life ain't easy for a boy named Ann

    2. Irish Says Enough Woodchippers   10 years ago

      "This wasn't a hate crime. This was an overabundance of passion."

      What does this mean? If hate crime has any meaning, I think the guy who shot a bunch of black people because he didn't want them in "his" country certainly qualifies.

      1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

        I'm being glib. Of course it's hateful. And awful.

      2. proseshooter   10 years ago

        Any deliberate killing including manslaughter is a hate crime. What kind of firearm was used in that he reloaded five times, yet no one seized the opportunity to jump him while we was reloading.

        1. MonsoonMoon   10 years ago

          That's not how that works, and precisely the reason why mag cap bans are useless.

          Even the most novice shooter doesn't take very long to reload.

          A better question is, why wasn't anyone in the church armed to defend themselves?

          1. AD-RtR/OS!   10 years ago

            The Church, naturally, is a Gun Free Zone.

          2. Vapourwear   10 years ago

            They misunderstand the sheep metaphor?

        2. MonsoonMoon   10 years ago

          That's not how that works, and precisely the reason why mag cap bans are useless.

          Even the most novice shooter doesn't take very long to reload.

          A better question is, why wasn't anyone in the church armed to defend themselves?

    3. Didyoumeanthat   10 years ago

      Hope he doesn't. Me and my pygmy pony dragging a wood chipper down that way...

  2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    I'm making an early call here:

    1) Aspy
    2) Low IQ
    2) Rejected by a cute girl
    3) More black friends than white

    1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      No, that was Elliot Rodger. Given the pic of the jacket and some other pics I've seen around the web, this guy's pretty obviously racist.*

      * SLD: His motivation in the crime should not play any part in the trial or sentencing. He should be sentenced like any other mass murderer should be (er, any non-officer mass murderer, that is).

      1. tarran   10 years ago

        I think motivation should play a role in mass murder.

        Here's a hypothetical... a man discovers that his daughter was raped at her preschool by the several members of the staff. However, the DA prosecutes incompetently,and they get off. The dad goes in and massacres the staff members he believes are responsible.

        Second hypothetical... a man discovers that his daughter has been dating someone he hates who works at the preschool she teaches at, and that their coworkers are covering for her. In a rage, he goes down to her school and massacres the coworkers and the boyfriend.

        Same act, *very* different motivations. Would you punish both equally?

        1. Scoop33   10 years ago

          Third hypothetical. Both acts occur by different fathers at the same time. Your mother is killed by the father who gets the lesser sentence. How does that make you feel?

          1. Rich   10 years ago

            Excellent.

          2. tarran   10 years ago

            I honestly wouldn't care. I've learned to divorce my emotions from nutty court judgments.

            Moreover, appealing to my feelings isn't an argument, is it? I feel bad when a guy gets his head sawed off in Syria. Should that trump a discussion about the pro's and cons of the U.S. army invading to restore order?

            1. Scoop33   10 years ago

              My point. Your hypotheticals involve the same crime with two different motivations which undoubtedly were based on a fathers feelings about his daughter. Why should one get punished less severely than the other?

          3. SimonJester   10 years ago

            I suppose that depends on weather or not your mother was the one dating the hypothetical daughter.

        2. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

          I'm all for different punishments based on motivations, but the discussion is 'hate crime', meaning charging a murderer with a different or extra crime.

          That is bullshit.

          All murder is hate motivated. Mans laughter is what we normally charge people with when it ain't.

          1. tarran   10 years ago

            I agree that the hate crime modifier is stupid and a distraction from the actual crime at hand.

            Take that cop who shot his wife yesterday. He clearly hated his wife, and yet that is not legally defined as a hate crime. The legislation describing hate crimes essentially politically picks a subset of criminal acts against persons or property and based on certain properties of the perpetrator and the victims decrees them especially bad. It's one thing to take racial animus into consideration when sentencing, it's another to elevate crimes committed out of racial animus as being more heinous than identical crimes committed for other reasons.

            1. JFree   10 years ago

              The 'hate crime' modifier is legally justification for the federal government to step in (under the 14th Amendment protection of ITS citizens) and oversee the criminal proceedings to make sure that those proceedings are based on actual evidence (due process) rather than community bias against some group.

              that's it. It really isn't silly. It is a direct successor of the old 'violation of civil rights' charge that was used to put pressure on fixing the old criminal culture of the south where there was no such thing as a fair trial or due process when the charge crossed racial lines.

          2. A special place in JW's Hell   10 years ago

            Motivation is irrelevant for sentencing, but not for determining guilt. That goes to intent.

            At least, in a sane world, that's how it would be.

          3. Monty Crisco   10 years ago

            I don't charge anyone with laughter. I pay for laughter!

        3. lap83   10 years ago

          "Would you punish both equally?"

          I would have sympathy for the man whose daughter was raped and the culprits were set free up until the point where he massacres the people he thinks are responsible. Sympathy doesn't mean you get a free pass to be a psycho.

        4. lap83   10 years ago

          "Would you punish both equally?"

          I would have sympathy for the man whose daughter was raped and the culprits were set free up until the point where he massacres the people he thinks are responsible. Sympathy doesn't mean you get a free pass to be a psycho.

          1. lap83   10 years ago

            If he killed some squirrels I might look the other way, however.

        5. C. S. P. Schofield   10 years ago

          I think motivation should play a role in a trial only when determining if the criminal believed his actions were justified under the law. Saying it hold have a role in a mass murder trial is absurd, absent what I would have to think would be rather peculiar circumstances. If he's guilty, he needs to be locked up or otherwise despised of. That is true whether he killed three or thirty.

        6. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          Intent matters and is an element of first-ever murder. Various defenses/justifications matter. What doesn't matter is why you kill, beyond the intent to unjustifiably kill.

          Hate crime is political B.S. Is a racist murder worse than a murder for hire?

        7. proseshooter   10 years ago

          Both would be guilty of premeditated murder. Due to political correctness he probably would receive life imprisonment at the very least. However, if a Muslim, including Black Muslims, were to murder a church full of white people, it would be because of white suppression 150 years ago, and he would be freed. Viva la revolucion

        8. Tionico   10 years ago

          Yep. Murder is murder and the biblically prescribed punishment for that crime is death. "Whoever by his hand spills the blood of innocents, by the hand of man shall his blood be spilled". Motive? Immaterial. Any deliberate killing must be punished by death after a fair trial.

        9. mpercy   10 years ago

          Did either man use a woodchipper as the murder weapon?

      2. ace_m82   10 years ago

        So, shot publicly. Good. What the jerk deserves.

      3. Zeb   10 years ago

        Doesn't the whole mens rea thing require some consideration of the motivations for committing crimes?

        1. proseshooter   10 years ago

          Only if it is a Democrat slaughtering Republicans, but not vise-versa.

        2. Tionico   10 years ago

          yes, it does, but that pertains only to the establishment of guilt/inocense of the killer. Proving "hate" does not make it an extra special crime except in the eyes of the feel-good crowd who want to crow and strut every time they can attach the word" racism" to any specific act.

    2. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

      I'll speculate along those lines further and say that the cute white girl that rejected him ended up with a black man.

      So social retard with undiagnosed mental illness discovers white supremacist literature and snaps.

      1. PBR Streetgang   10 years ago

        ^^This, except the girl need not be 'cute'.

        1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          "cute"

        2. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

          Well, redneck cute.

          1. RBS   10 years ago

            So, trashy hot.

          2. tarran   10 years ago

            So young, waifish, bad teeth?

            1. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

              But with two first names instead of some sort of vaguely vampiric moniker.

            2. Irish Says Enough Woodchippers   10 years ago

              So is Elizabeth Stoker Breunig now officially H&Rs; mascot or does there need to be some kind of induction ceremony?

              1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

                If she tweets us again, it's on.

            3. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

              A redneck ESB would probably have more useful knowledge. She'd at least be more interesting to read.

          3. JFree   10 years ago

            10 year old first cousin?

        3. Didyoumeanthat   10 years ago

          Heidi Klum kind of cute?

      2. The DerpRider   10 years ago

        Yeah, his friends list on FB is more than one quarter black. My guess is his ex was/is dating a black guy.

        1. Brian   10 years ago

          Well, he said they're raping our women.

          What are the odds we'll find some underlying rape accusation involved?

          When we get down to it, they all just might be victims of RAPE CULTURE!

    3. John Titor   10 years ago

      Yeah, when the guy's using Boer nationalist symbols there's a pretty good chance he's legitimately racist.

      Now watch as we spend the next a month obsessing over it. Which will never cause copycats from other pathetic attention craved pieces of shit. 'Spread the word'. Yeah, don't worry buddy, the media will do that for you soon enough.

      1. WTF   10 years ago

        And in spreading the word, the media will no doubt link him to the Tea Party and conservatives in general.

        1. SimonJester   10 years ago

          And, since he wore a patch with a green flag, and the Koch brothers, et. al., have also reportedly been seen wearing green, they are also racist, and probably to blame for this crime.

        2. SimonJester   10 years ago

          And, since he wore a patch with a green flag, and the Koch brothers, et. al., have also reportedly been seen wearing green, they are also racist, and probably to blame for this crime.

      2. Carolynp   10 years ago

        I'm calling bs in advance. "You're raping our women"? Sorry, not buying it.

    4. JeSuisRaison, moulin ? bois   10 years ago

      I'm making an early call here:

      1) Aspy
      2) Low IQ
      2) Rejected by a cute girl
      3) More black friends than whiteFalse flag

      FIFY

      1. Warty   10 years ago

        Seriously? Fuck off back to Free Republic.

      2. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

        What a trooper. This guy's throwing his life away for a "false flag."

        1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          That's just silly. He was mind controlled using rays from HAARP by Reptilians who wanted to make white people look bad so that they could more easily invade in the social turmoil.

          This is why it's important to always wear full body Faraday armor.

          1. Warty   10 years ago

            FALSE FLAG MUSLIM OBAMA BILDERBERG NEWTOWN FIRE CAN'T MELT STEEL JOOOOOOOOOS

            These fucking moron conspiracy fucks are fucking embarrassing.

            1. MonsoonMoon   10 years ago

              That's a lot of mass conglomerating of conspiracies, which if it weren't so ignorant, it'd be kind of impressive.

      3. Brian   10 years ago

        It's always a false flag.

    5. John   10 years ago

      That is my guess too. He apparently said "you are raping our women" while doing the shooting.

      1. tarran   10 years ago

        When I was researching my rebuttal to David Duke, I spent a lot of time lurking on stormfront.

        Those guys were really, really fixated on black men raping women. I recall seeing that fear/concern repeated on practically every thread I waded through.

        1. John   10 years ago

          What do you want to bet half or more of them have cuckold fetishes about their wives and black men?

          1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

            I think half is a serious underestimation. I'd say 80%+. There are probably some people in there who are really upset about it and haven't managed to fetishize it, but probably not a ton.

          2. EDG chippin' WUD   10 years ago

            Yes.

          3. mpercy   10 years ago

            Explains why there seems to be a large genre of porn with that theme...

        2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          Those people keep porn studios that specialize in interracial cuckolding porn afloat.

          1. Warty   10 years ago

            The racial politics of Dogfart must have spawned hundreds of PhD theses.

        3. Warty   10 years ago

          Isn't that one of the main ways tribal hatreds manifest themselves? Like, Der Stuermer was all about Jews raping German women, and Muslims and Hindus in India like to lynch each other over rape rumors, I believe.

          1. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

            "and Muslims and Hindus in India like to lynch each other over rape rumors"

            is that before or after they get done stoning the alleged victims?

          2. Iamtheeviltwin   10 years ago

            Don't forget the tribal witch hunts by women against men on college campuses...

        4. In League with the Dark Ones   10 years ago

          Those guys were really, really fixated on black men raping women.

          That was a historical concern. Up to 19.2% of of lynchings were done on grounds that the lynched had raped a white woman:

          Under Jim Crow any and all sexual interactions between black men and white women was illegal, illicit, socially repugnant, and within the Jim Crow definition of rape. Although only 19.2 percent of the lynching victims between 1882 to 1951 were even accused of rape, lynch law was often supported on the popular belief that lynchings were necessary to protect white women from black rapists.

          1. proseshooter   10 years ago

            It was also used to prevent theft of livestock. Back then there was a lot of race related stampeding of women and raping of cattle. Viva la revolucion.

    6. Warty   10 years ago

      4) Severely overestimated his own intelligence

    7. John Galt   10 years ago

      5) Recent drug and trespassing arrests
      6) Soup Bowl Haircut

      I'm thinking your call is most likely going to be right.

  3. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

    The jacket he's wearing in the pic on the bottom has the flags of Apartheid South Africa and Rhodesia. Not only is he racist, he's old school racist.

    1. John Titor   10 years ago

      He makes the South Africans in Lethal Weapon 2 look subtle.

      1. tarran   10 years ago

        Well, when one lacks diplomatic immunity...

        1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

          it's just been revoked.

          1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

            Diplomat don't surf.

            1. njolsson   10 years ago

              I thought it was Charlie who didn't surf.

  4. Free ?Woodchippers! Society   10 years ago

    Look at that kid's haircut. I mean if your head look exactly like a dick, wouldn't you shoot up a church?

    1. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

      And his middle name is Storm. As in Dylann Storm Roof.

      Good one, mom and dad.

      1. Free ?Woodchippers! Society   10 years ago

        So his head is shaped like a dick because he descends from dicks.

      2. Irish Says Enough Woodchippers   10 years ago

        I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the white nationalist with a middle name of 'Storm' just might have been raised to be a white nationalist by his parents. It's an awfully big coincidence that a word with a lot of appeal to skinheads happened to be a racist murderer's middle name.

        1. Marshal   10 years ago

          Agree. It's very likely he turns out to have significant involvement in crazy racist shit.

          1. Free ?Woodchippers! Society   10 years ago

            Crazy racist shit that despite it's rarity on the bell curve, authors at The Nation, Slate and Salon will argue "white America" must atone for.

            1. Free ?Woodchippers! Society   10 years ago

              Seeing a link below, I notice that Salon has already written that article. It's funny that I know what socialist weasels will say before they even say it.

              1. A special place in JW's Hell   10 years ago

                Seeing a link below, I notice that Salon has already written that article. It's funny that I know what socialist weasels will say before they even say it.

                Those are just boilerplate articles they already have written and waiting for the event to occur.

                Just fill in the blanks for the name and location and viola!

            2. Marshal   10 years ago

              Authors at the Nation, Slate, and Salon are idiots, as are millions of others with the same views. Point out they've never apologized to you for Colin Ferguson and see if they can catch up.

        2. l0b0t   10 years ago

          "... a word with a lot of appeal to skinheads ..."

          Also, a lot of appeal to black mutants.

          http://tinyurl.com/q5ned2b

      3. Woodchip-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

        Storm is a girl's name! God, it looks like his parents weren't even familiar with X-Men.

    2. Rhino   10 years ago

      Maybe a barber shop.

  5. Drake   10 years ago

    Nope. I refuse to learn his name or anything about him. When he is dead, I'll register that fact and nothing else.

    1. Otisjay   10 years ago

      If only the media would do this.

    2. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      I hate the celebrity handed to murdering nuts. Plaster their picture everywhere, etc. And the politics is sickening.

      1. Carolynp   10 years ago

        I thought they did that preschool shooting up right by posting bios of the victims only. I can't remember the name of the nutjob, either, even though libs used it to full jihad on guns.

  6. Ken Shultz   10 years ago

    Terrible tragedy.

    Condolences to the victims.

    I hope the nail the bastard that did this to the wall.

    ...after they give him a fair trial, of course.

    1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

      I hope he saves South Carolina the trouble.

  7. Judge Forrest's Clitdong   10 years ago

    Considering the scrawny build and horrible pudding bowl haircut, I'm calling this as an instance of Dork Cookoff.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Drugs. I knew it.

  9. Rich   10 years ago

    [Dylann Storm] Roof attended White Knoll High School

    Kid never had a chance.

    Seriously, this is really horrible.

    *** waits for investigators to publish his Facebook rants ***

    1. Irish Says Enough Woodchippers   10 years ago

      Yeah, if this dipshit had South African apartheid flags on his jacket and posted that picture on Facebook, I imagine at some point he had some semi-literate rantings about his hatred of darkies.

      1. Rich   10 years ago

        "At some point"?

        I imagine his shit is crawling with them.

        1. WTF   10 years ago

          Which of course will provide justification for the investigation and harassment of anyone posting unpopular thoughts.

          1. Rich   10 years ago

            Of course.

            Maybe even Islamists.

          2. JeSuisRaison, moulin ? bois   10 years ago

            Which of course will provide justification for the investigation and harassment of anyone posting unpopular thoughts.

            Preet Bharara is prolly in his fucking bunk right now.

  10. tarran   10 years ago

    You rape our women and you're taking over our country.

    Maybe he thought blazing saddles was a documentary.

  11. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

    Looks like he's been arrested. Taken alive.

  12. H. Protagonist   10 years ago

    Reloaded 5 times? And my county sheriff tells me "self defense" isn't "good cause" for me or my wife to get a carry permit.

    1. WTF   10 years ago

      This is why we need to ban high-capacity magazines, oh, wait......

    2. Free ?Woodchippers! Society   10 years ago

      I didn't think "may issue" jurisdictions were even legal anymore.

      1. WTF   10 years ago

        It is in New Jersey. I don't know about anyplace else, but the SCOTUS doesn't seem to mind allowing it to stand in conflict with Heller.

        1. Free ?Woodchippers! Society   10 years ago

          Heller must be one of those rulings that lower courts can voluntarily ignore. By that I mean, one of those rulings that weaken government power, those get ignored with impunity quite often.

        2. Drake   10 years ago

          NJ, NY, CT, RI, MA - you can buy a pistol after much red tape. You won't ever get a carry permit unless you know the local chief or sheriff.

        3. l0b0t   10 years ago

          Also, NYC. Here it's extra fun because the may issue is decided upon by the precinct captain in one's particular neighborhood, but only after paying a non-refundable application fee $380 to obtain a permit to own a firearm. If one wants to transport it in a motor vehicle, one needs a separate permit (also requiring a $380 non-refundable application fee).

          1. Free ?Woodchippers! Society   10 years ago

            "We gun controllers love the second amendment! We don't want guns to be illegal, we only want to criminalize holding them, loading them, using them, transporting them or assembling them. You libertarians always distorting the truth..."

          2. l0b0t   10 years ago

            The NYC permits are also per firearm, $380 per firearm for a possession permit; this is the primary reason my firearms are all transferred to a couple of FFL holding relatives in Texas. Hell, the application fee is more than double what I paid for my Mossberg 500s.

      2. H. Protagonist   10 years ago

        California: may issue at the discretion of the sheriff of the county in which you reside, but allows you to carry statewide with the permit. Which means if you live in Modoc county, it's essentially a shall issue state, but if you live in Los Angeles, it's a "crony and keep campaign fundraiser" only state.

  13. Rich   10 years ago

    Roof ... was given a gun by his father as a 21st birthday present

    Oops.

    1. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

      Somewhere on the spectrum, then armed.

      He said he had told his sister, Roof's mother, several years ago that Roof was too introverted.

      "I said he was like 19 years old, he still didn't have a job, a driver's license or anything like that and he just stayed in his room a lot of the time," Cowles said.

      1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

        He's the right age for schizophrenic break with reality, as well.

      2. Lord Humungus   10 years ago

        too introverted.

        a-ha! So he was a libertarian.

    2. proseshooter   10 years ago

      My father gave me my first shotgun when I was 9 and I never shot any humans, not even in Vietnam.

    3. HolgerDanske   10 years ago

      I'd like to know if this gun was transferred to him privately, or if the father took him to a gun store and had him complete a background check for the gun.

      Considering that he had been in trouble with the law with drugs, and was addicted (and in possession) of controlled substances, it's safe to say the father either privately gave him the gun knowing he was prohibited, or the murderer lied on the background check form.

      In either case the gun was transferred illegally, and a background check would not have been performed, and/or obviously didn't work.

  14. The Wood Chipper 5000   10 years ago

    Dylann Roof has been arrested in NC.

    http://www.wltx.com/

  15. Palin's Buttplug   10 years ago

    Free Republic/Stormfront/Bratbitch scurrying to depict this punk as a "liberal".

    1. Irish Says Enough Woodchippers   10 years ago

      And Salon scurrying to claim his actions are indicative of all white people/anyone anywhere to the right of Mao.

      Congratulations: You've discovered infantile and sleazy political posturing.

      Also, I don't think Stormfront is going to scurry to call this guy a liberal since Stormfront is probably going to be accepting him with open arms.

      1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

        You Irish bastard, you have to answer for this! Your skin is pale, so this violence is on your head!

    2. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

      As opposed to Salon's considered response.

    3. DesigNate   10 years ago

      Oh look, someone already proved Irish right.

      1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

        It's instances like this that lend credence to the idea that it's a sockpuppet. The posts are sometimes suspiciously perfect.

  16. Antilles   10 years ago

    I'm ashamed to say that my first reaction to this crime was dismay at how the left was going to spin this to 'prove' their narrative, rather than concern about the innocent people who died senselessly and needlessly. On the other hand, you know that most Proggies are salivating with glee right now. Unfortunate we can't put our differences aside and all come together to condemn individuals who commit these heinous acts--regardless of the skin color of the perpetrator or victims.

    1. Woodchip-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

      That's the MSM for you, though. It's not about offering condolences to the victims of this horrible crime. It's about which party we can allocate blame upon and how we can use this to push our pet issues.

    2. XM   10 years ago

      Most proggies don't blink when terrorists hit Jewish schools and synagogues. Obama ranted about the crusades only a few days after Kenji Goto (Christian) was decapitated.

      "Oh how dare they attack a place of worship".

  17. l0b0t   10 years ago

    Robby, you seem to have a great deal to learn about African history. Also, thinking that Rhodesia got royally fucked over by the British, noticing that every single thing that Ian Smith predicted has come to pass, and weeping to see the RSA turned from a prosperous nation into a 3rd-world hellhole does not make one a racial determinist.

    1. Calidissident   10 years ago

      You don't think it's reasonable to think that a guy who wore those flags and then shot up a black church might be racist and might be a fan of those countries for their racial policies? Mugabe being an evil bastard doesn't make Smith and Rhodesia any better, just as Castro doesn't make Batista a good guy, or as Lenin and Stalin don't make the Czars any better. Also, the RSA was prosperous for a very small minority, it's always been a 3rd world hellhole for most of the population - also, while there is plenty to criticize about it, much of the bad stuff is drastically exaggerated by white nationalist propaganda, especially in comparison to how things were under apartheid (for example, while the murder rate in SA is high, it's less than half of what it was when apartheid ended, and income levels are higher today for all racial groups than they were when apartheid ended).

      1. Seamus   10 years ago

        Mugabe being an evil bastard doesn't make Smith and Rhodesia any better

        No, Mugabe being a *worse* bastard than Smith is what makes Smith and Rhodesia better.

        1. Calidissident   10 years ago

          Forgive me for not being clear, by "any better" I meant "any better than they actually were." Mugabe being worse doesn't mean Rhodesia wasn't an evil regime that deserved and needed to go away (also, it was the actions of people like Smith that led to an environment where Mugabe could gain power in the first place, so they deserve some blame for that as well). We are not and should not be forced to pick between the Mugabes and Smiths of the world and say that one is fine because the other sucks worse. My comparison to Cuba and Russia/USSR is that supporters of Batista or the Czar are not somehow not reprehensible just because their replacements were as bad or worse.

  18. Ken Shultz   10 years ago

    I don't know if we're seeing a major shift in the old political fault lines or just classic liberal values being thrown completely out the window (or maybe it's both!), but all the signs are there...

    In the last 48 hours, I've seen progressives, who used to rail against fundamentalists trying to impose their beliefs on the rest of us to the tune of separation of church and state, insist that we should rearrange our economic system to fight global warming and be consistent with what the pope is saying about science.

    I've seen people who claim to be all about civil rights rail against white people everywhere and their inherent incurable racism--because of the actions of one young white man.

    We need to chuck our old score cards. The standard positions don't mean what they used to mean. If science is now about supporting the pope, and being against racism is about making generalizations about other people based on their race? Then whatever being on the left means now, it doesn't mean what it used to mean.

    1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

      Just remember that politics is the mind-killer, and that it's usually emotions that rule. Then a lot of the irrationality becomes understandable.

    2. John   10 years ago

      Ken that is because there is very little difference between the far right and the far left. They both embrace collective guilt and the use of political terrorism. What is happening is the masks are coming off and we are seeing how close they are.

    3. Free ?Woodchippers! Society   10 years ago

      Then whatever being on the left means now, it doesn't mean what it used to mean.

      It's always meant holding onto a set of poorly reasoned and inconsistent ideas and presenting those ideas in bad faith.

    4. MSimon   10 years ago

      The Party Line has change. Woe to those who don't change with it.

    5. Win Bear   10 years ago

      In the last 48 hours, I've seen progressives, who used to rail against fundamentalists trying to impose their beliefs on the rest of us to the tune of separation of church and state, insist that we should rearrange our economic system to fight global warming and be consistent with what the pope is saying about science.

      Progressives and Christian churches have a long history of collaborating in Europe, in part because it has been financially so beneficial to the churches, and in part because both are inherently statist and authoritarian. So this really shouldn't come as a surprise.

      I've seen people who claim to be all about civil rights rail against white people everywhere and their inherent incurable racism--because of the actions of one young white man.

      Again, the details have changed, but the principles haven't: progressives a century ago believed that there intrinsic differences between the races that are passed on across generations, just as they do now; only the details have changed. When progressives advocated forced sterilization and segregation, they really deluded themselves into thinking that they would be good for everybody, including their victims.

    6. humblebrag   10 years ago

      it makes more sense (to me at least) when you adjust it to this:

      People who want/demand equality of outcomes, even when those outcomes mean double standards or contradictions vs. people who don't, because of the double standards and contractions and their consequences on society.

      thats how I see it anyway.

    7. humblebrag   10 years ago

      it makes more sense (to me at least) when you adjust it to this:

      People who want/demand equality of outcomes, even when those outcomes mean double standards or contradictions vs. people who don't, because of the double standards and contractions and their consequences on society.

      thats how I see it anyway.

    8. proseshooter   10 years ago

      This church was a gun free zone, which is probably why he chose it as a target. Viva la revolucion.

  19. Jordan   10 years ago

    Never trust a guy with a bowl-cut.

    1. WTF   10 years ago

      Not even Prince Valiant?

    2. l0b0t   10 years ago

      IDK, Moe Howard seems like the most trustworthy of the Stooges.

      1. WTF   10 years ago

        And he was also the most likely to visit violence upon others. I think I'm seeing a pattern here.

      2. EDG chippin' WUD   10 years ago

        I was always partial to Larry. He never really started any shit, but he could handle himself. Also, when the Stooges were in a jam, his solutions usually involved explosives or fire, "Let's blast it open!"

        1. l0b0t   10 years ago

          And to be fair, Larry Fine had the 2nd best haircut (Shemp wins 1st prize).

        2. l0b0t   10 years ago

          "... his solutions usually involved explosives or fire, "Let's blast it open!""

          Also, now all I can think of is Sid Caesar and Edie Adams trying to extricate themselves from a hardware store basement. Additionally, Peter Falk is brilliant in that film (he calls a policeman a "fat NAZI").

        3. A special place in JW's Hell   10 years ago

          I See Moe

    3. Ye Olde Kaptious Kristen   10 years ago

      I'm glad you qualified that with the word "guy".

  20. PapayaSF   10 years ago

    What are the odds the guy was on some sort of anti-depressant?

    What I find interesting and particularly obnoxious is that the guy hates blacks and links them to rape, but the ones he chooses to murder are in Bible study in a church. Dude, those are not the blacks you're looking for. They're not likely to be rapists (especially the women). If you're going to act on your wild generalizations, try to make better ones. You could have found a group of young black male gangbangers and shot them. But oh, right, they might have shot back. Coward.

    1. DesigNate   10 years ago

      $5 says he got rejected by a black girl.

      Or like you said, he went after the easiest of targets cause he's a cowardly piece of shit.

      1. Ye Olde Kaptious Kristen   10 years ago

        i'm gonna go with the peanut gallery above and say he got rejected by a white chick, who then went on to date a black dude.

        1. Irish Says Enough Woodchippers   10 years ago

          "i'm gonna go with the peanut gallery above and say he got rejected by a white chick, who then went on to date a black dude."

          Except his parents named him 'Storm' and he openly wore apartheid South Africa flags, which makes me think he was just raised to be an outright racist.

          1. A special place in JW's Hell   10 years ago

            I'll take "Why are we trying to divine the motives of a 150 lb. fruit cake?" for $400, Alex.

      2. WTF   10 years ago

        I'm leaning toward the scenario where he got rejected by a white girl for a black guy, and then went after the easiest of targets because he's a cowardly piece of shit.

    2. John   10 years ago

      I will be curious to see if he is. I know causality can go both ways. Maybe it is the case that lunatics also happen to be the kind of people who take anti-depressants. But I am starting to wonder if the anti-depressants don't make at least a few ordinary losers into murderous lunatics.

      1. Warty   10 years ago

        The early 20s are when schizophrenia manifests itself. It seems more likely that he needed more drugs than less.

  21. Arisuka   10 years ago

    "and Rhodesia, an unrecognized nation that rebelled against black majority rule."

    They weren't rebelling. The Marxist blacks, lead by Mugabe, were rebelling against the Rhodesian government, which just happened to be majority white. There is a difference.

    1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

      Yes, that was very badly phrased.

    2. Drake   10 years ago

      Then the White rulers stepped down and everyone lived happily ever after.

    3. John Titor   10 years ago

      Fortunately, the recognized nation of Zimbabwe has been going swimmingly ever since Mugabe took over and collapsed the economy and gave his cronies those horrible white people's farm land.

  22. Hamster of Doom   10 years ago

    See that face? That's a face that has said the words, "Fuck women. I'm a nice guy. I'm nice to them. The only reason I can't get laid is women hate nice guys."

    1. Brochettaward   10 years ago

      I'm going to guess more like Daddy issues. His father is probably just as racist and viewed this kid as a disappointment - which he obviously was.

      1. Ye Olde Kaptious Kristen   10 years ago

        Hamsters hypothesis and yours aren't mutually exclusive.

        Her point is that the self-identified "nice guy" is very often a socially-awkward junior douchebag who feels he's entitled to a certain class of woman who wouldn't touch him with a 10-foot-pole.

        1. Irish Says Enough Woodchippers   10 years ago

          Fuck you guys, if women can't tell how nice I am, it's not my fault they all date stupid jerks with nice abs and fast cars and lots of money and for some reason won't sleep with me on the futon in my parent's basement.

          I have an X-Box One and so many games and I have it on good authority that that's the kind of thing women should be in to.

          1. Ye Olde Kaptious Kristen   10 years ago

            What's funny about the Xbox line, is that the "nice guys" will rudely grill any woman that says she's into gaming so she can prove to him she's a "real gamer girl".

            That all goes back to the socially awkward stuff.

            1. Hamster of Doom   10 years ago

              "You didn't play Fable's Anniversary edition, then. I see."

              *crosses off list*

              /Nice Guy. SO nice.

          2. Calidissident   10 years ago

            What I find most funny about those kind of guys is that they rarely go after their female equivalents ("nice girls" who don't get a lot of attention from guys).

            1. Hamster of Doom   10 years ago

              That's the punchline. They're not nice, they're cunts who lack sufficient hawtness/coolth/cash to get laid despite their cunt behavior.

              1. Calidissident   10 years ago

                I'm aware. The lack of self-awareness is just astounding and that's what really gets me.

            2. F. Libertarian Stalin, Jr.   10 years ago

              Take it from one of those so-called nice guys: they don't "go for" the nice girls because they're not very adventurous in the first place. They don't go for anyone, most of the time; they admire from afar and just assume it's not going to work in the first place because of some flaw they see in themselves, real or imagined. Then the resentment starts and builds.

              1. Calidissident   10 years ago

                "They don't go for anyone, most of the time; they admire from afar"

                I have noticed this too, but in my experience the subjects of their admiration are still rarely their female equivalent, which was my main point.

        2. Brochettaward   10 years ago

          They aren't necessarily contradictory, know. But if we are psychoanalyzing based on his comment, I think too much is being read into it. The racist mumbo jumbo espoused by the Storm Front types almost always includes references to how they rape white women. It's kind of just par the course for their propaganda.

    2. Ye Olde Kaptious Kristen   10 years ago

      Ding ding ding!

      How many fedoras in his closet?

      1. A special place in JW's Hell   10 years ago

        TRILBY IS NOT A FEDORA.

        Know your enema.

        1. Ye Olde Kaptious Kristen   10 years ago

          They're the ones calling them fedoras. I couldn't possibly care less about what to call someone's scuzzy-looking headgear.

    3. Warty   10 years ago

      If only he'd waited a little while so he could buy my all-new interracial PUA guide. The Pussy Hound 4: The Blackening. So many lives could have been saved.

      1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

        Chapter 2: If all else fails, trans-dimensional tentacle rape everyone and everything within the known universe until it stops moving.

        I'm gonna need at least three copies.

        1. Juan "Brushmaster" Seguin   10 years ago

          Good call. My copy was defective, all the pages started sticking together shortly after I got it.

    4. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

      I knew it. Screw the SF crowd, the blood is on the hands of internet MRAs.

    5. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

      Lennie looked sadly up at him. "They was so little," he said apologetically. "I'd pet 'em, and pretty soon they bit my fingers and I pinched their heads a little and then they was dead?because they was so little. I wish't we'd get the rabbits pretty soon, George. They ain't so little."

  23. Brochettaward   10 years ago

    The low IQ part above is almost certainly correct. Social outcast, almost certainly raised in a racist household. And yea, I'm guaranteeing their will be online rants they connect to him. You don't wear those flags on your jacket unless you are pretty seriously involved in the cause there.

  24. Cirrusly   10 years ago

    The murderer should be punished for this heinous crime. But let us not forget that Dylan Roof is to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. My heart goes out to the victims and the community.

    1. Brochettaward   10 years ago

      There's video of him entering the church and witnesses to the shooting. I don't think there's much doubt as to his innocence.

      1. Woodchip-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

        Should be an easy trial, then.

    2. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

      Who cares about whether Roof is guilty? That's a tedious job for the legal process. No, what matters is indicting much larger groups to which he belonged either by birth or predilection. And the best part is, we don't have to prove their guilt.

  25. Win Bear   10 years ago

    Look, the shooter is white-skinned and an evil monster. If you are white-skinned, that obviously means you are probably an evil monster deep down inside too and you certainly share part of his guilt. Fight racism! /prog

  26. John   10 years ago

    And watch as the very same people who swear that things like Rotherham and the barbaric treatment of gays, apostates and non Muslims in nearly every majority Muslim nation on earth says nothing about Islam as a whole proceed to explain how the acts of a single psychotic in Charleston proves that America is irredeemably racist and all white men who are not confirmed Democratic voters should be disarmed and placed under police surveillance.

    1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

      The problem in Rotherham wasn't a matter of religion or ethnicity but one of exceptions carved out for political reasons. Those conspirators and traffickers acted within the social penumbra created by cultural apologists and the authorities who operated under informal rules that protected the rapists. When columnists on the left come up with a corollary in America other than alleging intangibles like the Giffords-Palin-crosshairs "link" or the old gun-control throwaway, they might be worth taking seriously.

      1. John   10 years ago

        No. they operated in a culture that accepted it. What they did is totally okay in Pakistan. And they got away with it because the police were afraid of being called racists and ultimately didn't give a shit if working class white girls were being raped. It was the direct result of identity politics. Muslim men have greater rights than working class girls and were therefore allowed to rape them.

  27. Cloudbuster   10 years ago

    When you've murdered nine people in cold blood, you've committed enough good old "crime crime" to deserve the harshest possible penalty. Labeling it a hate crime is just fodder for race agitators.

    1. Woodchip-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

      That's all hate crime legislation ever is

  28. Woodchip-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

    Cue "Blame the libertarians" in 3...2...1....

  29. Brochettaward   10 years ago

    Obama is already getting on national TV to address this matter. Never let a good crisis go to waste...

  30. Lord Humungus   10 years ago

    based on what I remember from my punk rock days - and later from doing shows for the local scene, this guy isn't a white power skinhead*:

    the hair is wrong - should have been close-cropped or a baldy
    no flight jacket or British clothing - Fred Perry / Lonsdale
    didn't see any boots with white laces

    The choice of flags is interesting though - shows some real historical knowledge. It makes me wonder if he (or his family) is native to the States. So perhaps just your old-fashioned racist.

    *note - all conjecture based on a few pics and a whole bunch of guesses.

    1. commodious spittoon   10 years ago

      In fairness, I've known a number of Paulites who are freakishly well-informed of the goings-on in 1913 and the most picayune details surrounding the creation of the FRB, but who I would not trust with my car even if valet parking is free.

    2. John   10 years ago

      Yeah, he is just a loser. He is not a white power skin head. He doesn't fit their mold. He fits the Adam Lanza, somewhere on the Aspy scale, psychotic reject mold.

  31. MSimon   10 years ago

    http://www.counton2.com/story/.....charleston

    1. MSimon   10 years ago

      Suggested by this comment:

      http://reason.com/blog/2015/06.....nt_5378707

      Comments to MSimon's link above (at 10:28) include someone claiming there were black gangs attacking whites in Charleston back in April.

      1. Woodchip-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

        This is going to encourage more subpoenaing of internet commenters' identities.

        Just think if he had a woodchipper!

      2. KerryW   10 years ago

        I made that comment... nice find on that report, I was too lazy to look for it.

        The news video never said anywhere that the teens were black. The news article that went with the video never mentioned it, except for quoting the campus alert, which did say there were 15 black teens.

  32. Warty   10 years ago

    Just in case any of you would like to dislike Obama a little bit more.

    Lainie Fritz @lainiefritz
    Obama: "this type of mass violence does not happen in other advanced countries." @WCBD #CharlestonShooting
    Retweeted by WCBD

    1. John   10 years ago

      The people of Norway are on the phone and would like to have a word with him. Honestly I don't think he is lying. I think he is just that stupid and out of touch with reality. As George Castanza says, "it is not a lie if you believe it". I think he really believes the things like this he pulls out of his ass.

      What a moron. He is by far and away the least intelligent and thoughtful President ever to hold office.

      1. Woodchip-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

        Je suis...um...wait, what was the question?

        1. John   10 years ago

          He is like a spoiled child. One of those kids who their parents treat like a trained seal and reward for any acting out or showing off no matter how immature and annoying. His whole career is built around spouting bullshit and being rewarded by condescending white Progs for doing so.

      2. Mike M.   10 years ago

        I guess the Holocaust never really happened in this retarded dipshit's world.

      3. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        France, Norway, Scotland, Japan, etc., etc., etc. . .all apparently not advanced nations.

        Most useless president ever.

      4. lap83   10 years ago

        As George Castanza says, "it is not a lie if you believe it". I think he really believes the things like this he pulls out of his ass.

        I think it's a combination of narcissism and stupidity. Stupid people can be humble and at least realize that they don't have the power to make something so just by saying it.

    2. Irish Says Enough Woodchippers   10 years ago

      Well, in fairness, Obama skipped the Charlie Hebdo rally, so it's very possible he's unaware that anything happened.

    3. MSimon   10 years ago

      His father gave him the gun for his 21st Birthday.

      http://www.nydailynews.com/new.....-1.2262393

    4. Brochettaward   10 years ago

      Is it racist if I point out that white violence in America is entirely comparable to white violence in other 'advanced' countries?

      The gun control they always suggest would do nothing to stop the mass shootings they are in response to. Nothing in the Sandy Hook gun control push would have stopped Sandy Hook. Nothing they suggest here would have stopped this one.

      This story was going one way from this morning. This is like the progressive wet dream for a mass shooting. The guy is almost certainly ring wing, white, racially motivated...Only thing missing is he didn't use an 'assault weapon' judging by the reloading 5 times thing. But that's a minor detail that will be glossed over by the press.

      They get to beat the gun control, crazy right wing extremist, and racism drums all in one story.

      1. Irish Says Enough Woodchippers   10 years ago

        "Is it racist if I point out that white violence in America is entirely comparable to white violence in other 'advanced' countries?"

        Yes it would be because we're supposed to pretend that the problem is 'American' violence when the actual problem is inner-city African American violence.

        The problem is that progressives refuse to acknowledge that you can state a fact without making editorial positions on why that fact is true. So saying 'look, the problem is inner city black violence and we should figure out what to do about that rather than pretending something that's a regional problem is actually a national problem' is considered to be racist even though at no point did anyone argue that the violence in black neighborhoods is because of their race.

        They don't want to acknowledge this problem because they view black people as inherently victims so they don't want to say anything that could even be construed as negative and also because their political goals are helped by pretending there's a 'national' problem of American violence which actually doesn't exist. If it's a regional problem then national gun control doesn't make sense as a solution, and that' their real goal.

      2. In League with the Dark Ones   10 years ago

        Only thing missing is he didn't use an 'assault weapon' judging by the reloading 5 times thing.

        Reloading 5 time and "assault weapon" are not mutually exclusive.

    5. John Titor   10 years ago

      Norway, France, Britain, Canada (if three Mounties and/or a Parliament Hill shooting count? Moreso if you count FLQ stuff), Australia, Germany, Spain and a couple dozen others all disagree genius. Also, let's just multiply all their rates by six to ten considering all those places are much, much smaller population wise.

      1. Irish Says Enough Woodchippers   10 years ago

        Dude, Norway has 5 million people in it which is 1/60th of America's population. Anders Breivik killed 77 people.

        By my math, that means that Anders Breivik killed a greater proportion of Norwegians than every American mass shooter has killed in the last...what? 30 years? 4620 Americans would have to die for it to be the same percentage of our country's population.

    6. XM   10 years ago

      He's right, Israel is not an advanced nation.

      "You know, we have to remember that Christians did bad things in the past, we can't get on the high horse".

      Right after the Kenji Goto beheading. Didn't attend the Paris rally and didn't say anything of importance after ISIS executed 20 Egyptian Christians.

    7. Win Bear   10 years ago

      Having been born in one of those "other advanced countries", I have two things to remark: (1) yes, this sort of thing does happen in other advanced countries, and (2) I would prefer if the US remain neither "advanced" nor "civilized" in the European sense.

  33. John Galt   10 years ago

    So there's soup bowl haircut revival among the Stormfront crowd, too? Up and until now, all the soup bowls I've seen in recent years were all being sported by hipsters or other assorted members of the progfascist crowd.

  34. Woodchip-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

    I, for one, think the best way to prevent a tragedy like this from ever happening again is to divide Americans into tribes based on arbitrary factors like how much melanin their skin produces, and collectively blame all people who, despite being appropriately dismayed at this despicable act, happen to share certain physical characteristics.

    Also, something something libertarians something....

  35. MSimon   10 years ago

    Maybe it has something to do with a mob attacking women in Charleston in April:

    http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/9-1.....harleston/

  36. Half-Virtue, Half-Vice   10 years ago

    Tie a noose and make it tight,
    A feast for crow come tonight!

  37. The Grinch   10 years ago

    For a guy guy who didn't want to get caught or go out in a blaze of glory, not changing the, um, distinctive haircut was a bad move. How often do you see that, maybe 1 on 10,000 adults? I'd put money on either dumb as dirt or crazy as a shithouse rat.

  38. Mike M.   10 years ago

    I've been perusing some of the lefty boards, and frankly it's pretty fucking pathetic how gleeful they are that one of these horrible events finally turned out to be a racist white neo-Nazi type. It appears that they think this incident validates their political views or something.

  39. SilverSurfer   10 years ago

    I'm puzzled by this sentence: " Rhodesia, an unrecognized nation that rebelled against black majority rule." Seems sort of hair-splitting to call it an "unrecognized nation". You are only a nation of the super-nation says you are? Or your previous colonial overlords? Seems an odd position for a libertarian magazine to tacitly support.

    Despite the fretting of the Brits and presumably the UN, Rhodesia managed to run it's own affairs for the period from 1965 to 1979. And in the period before that there was the colony of Southern Rhodesia.

    1. BuSab Agent   10 years ago

      Do you have a flag?

      /Eddie Izzard

  40. Walter Heisenburg   10 years ago

    False Flag attack aimed at keeping the racial tensions high and a means to an end for gun owners. They will be coming for the guns. I got something for them and it isn't my gun... try and get me and see.

    1. Calidissident   10 years ago

      /sarc?

      1. Joshua   10 years ago

        I'm afraid not. There are a few folks throughout the 'verse who are claiming this is a false flag thing. My theories:
        -False flag claiming false flag to make reason commenters look like crazies
        -Genuinely thinks this might be a false flag operation
        -Troll

  41. Seamus   10 years ago

    The attack is considered a hate crime.

    Well, it sure doesn't look like a love crime.

  42. brown   10 years ago

    Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8596 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...
    http://www.worktoday7.com

  43. proseshooter   10 years ago

    I suppose the anti-gunners will have a field day over this. What kind of firearm did he use? He is too young to legally purchase handguns.

  44. scallywag   10 years ago

    Friends of Dylann Roof said he had openly boasted planning a massacre, but what is equally disturbing is that Roof had been arrested 2 times earlier this year, first, after scoping a shopping mall and asking when workers came and left (he would be found to have drugs on him) and secondly when he returned to the mall's roof, 2 months later taking logistics. Why? Had he being planning a massacre back then? And were blacks always his target and why did he in the end settle on the church?

    http://scallywagandvagabond.co.....-massacre/

  45. Duelles   10 years ago

    Some are not fit to live among us. Death penalty or life without parole . . . I don't care which. Crazy frigging bastard.

  46. Gene Poole   10 years ago

    A hate crime. It's interesting to speculate on what it would be called were he of, say, Kazakh origin.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

'Banal Horror': Asylum Case Deals Trump Yet Another Loss on Due Process

Billy Binion | 5.29.2025 5:27 PM

Supreme Court Unanimously Agrees To Curb Environmental Red Tape That Slows Down Construction Projects

Jeff Luse | 5.29.2025 3:31 PM

What To Expect Now That Trump Has Scrapped Biden's Crippling AI Regulations

Jack Nicastro | 5.29.2025 3:16 PM

Original Sin, the Biden Cover-Up Book, Is Better Late Than Never

Robby Soave | 5.29.2025 2:23 PM

Did 'Activist Judges' Derail Trump's Tariffs?

Eric Boehm | 5.29.2025 2:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!