Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Administration to Unilaterally Extend Overtime Pay, Senator Wants TSA Report Declassified, Political Shakeup in Turkey: P.M. Links

J.D. Tuccille | 6.8.2015 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • tj.blackwell / Foter / CC BY-NC

    By administrative rule, the Obama administration plans to double the salary threshold, from $23,660 to as much as $52,000, below which workers must be paid overtime. That should get business expansion going, right?

  • The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration wants to stick a breathalyzer in everybody's car. Yes, really.
  • Sen. Bernie Sanders (I but really D-Vt.) took 41 percent in a Wisconsin straw poll, holding Hillary Clinton to 49 percent.
  • The leaked report on the TSA's inability to detect guns and bombs at airports really needs to be declassified so we can all admire the agency's epic fail, says Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.).
  • Turkey's authoritarian president received a whack to the noggin when voters stripped his Justice and Development Party of its parliamentary majority.
  • Get your money out of Iceland while you can! The country is replacing explicit capital controls introduced after the 2008 crash with a 39 percent exit tax. How many gold coins can you stuff into your shoes?

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: California May Be Next to Pass Police Asset Forfeiture Reform

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (440)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Sen. Bernie Sanders (I but really D-Vt.) took 41 percent in a Wisconsin straw poll, holding Hillary Clinton to 49 percent.

    Lack of options, Wisconsin?

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Hello.

      I like bananas but don't like banana flavored candy.

      Why?

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        What about banana milkshakes?

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          Nope.

          Although I'm lactose (and progressive) intolerant.

          1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

            I prefer fake banana milkshakes to the real thing.

            1. Free Society   10 years ago

              I heard that your milkshakes bring all the boys to the yard. Is that true?

      2. expat   10 years ago

        Bananas do a poor job of imitating the flavour of banana candy, that's why!

      3. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

        I like bananas but not if they are overly ripe. Nice and yellow is fine, but once they start to get brown, no thank you. I think banana candy tastes more like brown bananas. Or nothing like bananas at all. I dunno, it's been a while since I tried any.

        1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          Banana candy has this taste that reminds me of yeasty booze. Particularly Korean ??? (makkoli).

          1. Catatafish   10 years ago

            I get that banana flavor in certain Belgian farmhouse ales.

            1. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

              That's from the yeast, I'll bet. There's a duBoeuf strain that makes all their wines have that same aroma and flavor.

          2. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

            Huh, I would have pegged you as a connoisseur of dongdongju, Jesse.

            My mother in law forced me to drink several big bowls of makkoli the time I broke out in hives after eating some bundaegi (grilled silk work larvae).

            1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

              I didn't mind the taste of bundaegi, but the smell was too...earthy for my preference.

            2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

              He's a connoisseur of dongdongju

        2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          If you're making ice cream with bananas, they have to be damn near rotten. Straight from the Ben and Jerry's ice cream cookbook.

          1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

            Yes, that and banana bread. And put them in the freezer to make them easier to mash. Learned that from Alton Brown.

          2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

            Also banana bread. There should be more brown than yellow on the skin.

            1. Paul.   10 years ago

              Just how I like my women.

              *looks around*

              What?!

              1. Agammamon   10 years ago

                I would hope so - but I imagine there's an internet group for people who are into women suffering kidney failure.

      4. Ted S.   10 years ago

        What about banana hammocks?

      5. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

        Maybe it's the shape of the banana you really like?

        /NTTAWWT

      6. RBS   10 years ago

        Banana Runts are great. Do they still make those?

        1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          Yes. I got them at a candy store in a terminal at SFO the other week.

          1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

            Got a cunning bunch of runts, did you?

            1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

              Ah, that reminds me. I need to respond to your email. I was without internet for the week.

      7. Brett L   10 years ago

        Because that's what real men feel. (I agree) More seriously, the esthers that they use to make banana flavoring are simplified and concentrated in flavorings and overwhelm my taste buds.

        1. Ted S.   10 years ago

          Do you prefer your banana flavoring made with Esther Williams, or Esther Rolle?

          1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

            Another valuable grammar and spelling contribution by Ted S

            1. Ted S.   10 years ago

              Thank you for the hat-tip.

          2. Brett L   10 years ago

            Hey, Ted, does anal retentive get a hyphen?

            1. Ted S.   10 years ago

              I wouldn't know. I'm not anal retentive.

        2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          My local gourmet grocery store sells 30 some odd Jelly Belly flavors individually. The esthers are really hit and miss. The really good ones: green apple, pomegranate, and pear. The others are meh, but I'd eat them if they were in front of me.

          1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

            meh c. esther

          2. Paul.   10 years ago

            You don't need that many Jelly Belly flavors.

            1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

              At least 29 of those are taking food straight out of the mouths of orphans!

              1. Pathogen   10 years ago

                I agree, the reckless ambition of 29 redundant flavors constitutes theft.. and sedition..

          3. Pathogen   10 years ago

            "The really good ones: green apple, pomegranate, and pear."

            They are neither Fair Trade, nor Cruelty Free... #GoBack2Monsanto Koch-sucker!

      8. Sudden   10 years ago

        I read that as banana flavored gravy. Because you're Canadian.

        1. Xeones   10 years ago

          They got strange ideas about food in America's Hat.

        2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          I think some of you are mean just for the sake of it.

          /looks at Bobarian and Sudden.

          1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

            Psst - cast a much, much wider gaze.

      9. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        It's probably due to the difference in taste between real bananas and artificial banana flavor.

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          There's always 'yellow' flavor:

          http://bit.ly/1KRkX6a

    2. The Last American Hero   10 years ago

      Why bother with straw polls. Team Blue, the alleged party of the little guy, relies quite heavily on Super-Delegates to select the candidate.

      1. CatoTheElder   10 years ago

        The teachers are going for Hillary! no matter what.
        Dem women are going Hillary! no matter what.
        Wall Street Dems are going Hillary! no mater what.
        The unions might split, but a plurality are going Hillary! no matter what.
        The Dem lobbyists, flacks, and hacks know which side their bread is buttered, and most will go Hillary! no matter what.

        That pretty well wraps up the super-delegates for Hillary!.

    3. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      I'm stealing Fisty's top comment for an important public service announcement.

      THE DOJ ISSUED REASON A "SECRET" SUBPOENA TO OUT COMMENTERS WHO TALKED SMACK ABOUT THE IDIOT JUDGE IN THE SILK ROAD CASE.

      1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

        "Reason.com, a leading libertarian website whose clever writing is eclipsed only by the blowhard stupidity of its commenting peanut gallery."

        1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

          We certainly are blowhards. As for stupidity, well, Shriek and all his sockpuppets post here.

        2. db   10 years ago

          I read that and was surprised to learn that Ken White is PB.

          1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

            Ken dislikes us in the same way Virginia Postrel dislikes us. He's far too smart to be PB. Then again, Ralph Wiggum is far too smart to be PB.

            1. Episiarch   10 years ago

              PB is one of Tulpa's myriad socks.

              1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

                I repeat my statement.

            2. Tonio   10 years ago

              Funny you shout mention that, Andy. I was reading Ken's article and was struck by the Postrel-like, bite-the-hand-that-feeds-you nature of the article. Yeah, some of those comments were over the top, though not anywhere close to actual, credible threats, methinks. Intimidation, anyone?

              Now, as far as Popehat goes, the commenters are generally favorable towards him and probably drive a measurable percentage of his traffic. You're welcome, Ken. I also understand his frustration at the bad publicity, the substance of which will surely be spun out of all recognition. As we achieve a higher profile in public discourse, so will we be subject to greater scrutiny.

              1. Tonio   10 years ago

                bite-the-hand-that-feeds-you nature of the article tone of that sentence

        3. Knarf Yenrab!   10 years ago

          I was smart enough not to become a lawyer, Ken. Can you say the same?

          People who served as federal prosecutors should be careful where they aim those stones.

      2. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

        That's scary. I wonder how the comments even came to their attention? Did some busybody call it in, or did the NSA scoop them up? I wish that was a sarcastic question, but it is very serious.

        1. Almanian!   10 years ago

          Save it for the DoJ Board of Inquiry, prisoner.

        2. Tonio   10 years ago

          Srsly, LP, you don't think we are monitored by both our proggie enemies and by government? We are ""anti-government"" after all.

      3. Catatafish   10 years ago

        Christ on a fucking crutch. This would be hilariously absurd if it wasn't so utterly terrifying.

        But I guess that's the point. Cunts.

      4. Free Society   10 years ago

        Well that's sort of terrifying. Merely participating on a forum that is being scanned by federal predators is pretty damn dangerous. Who wants a tall glass of chilled speech?

        1. Trials and Trippelations   10 years ago

          I always thought the NSA snooping and the tyranny of the government would affect other people. It's crazy for something like to happen so close to home.

          Freedom is truly dead

          1. Free Society   10 years ago

            In the past when I bitch about the government, even still in my mind I'd draw a line around governments like Pinochet or some SE Asian dictatorship. I thought to myself, well the US isn't that evil. I truly accept that I was wrong on that point.

            I'm fucking terrified of the US federal government. It's a purpose built life destruction machine and it would enslave, kidnap or kill every one of us the moment such an action would be perceived of as legitimate. I really don't think it will be long before any criticism of federales becomes verboten, either legally or through harassment by law enforcement agencies.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    The leaked report on the TSA's inability to detect guns and bombs at airports really needs to be declassified so we can all admire the agency's epic fail...

    But the terrorists will know we're vulnerable!

  3. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    "By administrative rule"

    What is this? I've never heard of it before...

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Only progs can understand it.

    2. Ted S.   10 years ago

      It's also known as the FYTW Clause.

    3. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

      "L'etat c'est moi, bitchez." ---The Sun King, Barack Obama.

    4. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      It's something Democrats decry while Team Red is in charge but do it themselves when they're in charge. You know, like everything else.

      1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        More and more unilateral executive moves, less and less protest about it from the other branches. I've seen this movie and don't like how it ends.

        1. Xeones   10 years ago

          Hitler?

          1. grrizzly   10 years ago

            Hindenburg.

            1. Ted S.   10 years ago

              Oh, the humanity.

              1. grrizzly   10 years ago

                Sakrament des B?ffels.

          2. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

            He was in one of the early remakes, yes.

  4. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration wants to stick a breathalyzer in everybody's car. Yes, really.

    Next up: electric fence collar!

  5. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

    The leaked report on the TSA's inability to detect guns and bombs at airports really needs to be declassified so we can all admire the agency's epic fail, says Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.).

    "Kochthugligans and sequester to blame." -NYT

  6. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    The leaked report on the TSA's inability to detect guns and bombs at airports really needs to be declassified so we can all admire the agency's epic fail, says Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.)

    Ben Sasse, be careful or you're going to get tasered and cuffed next time you fly out of Washington DC.

    1. Jerry on the sea   10 years ago

      Silly you, Senators don't fly commercial.

      1. grrizzly   10 years ago

        Please... How else would they have a wide stance in MSP?

        1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          I'm actually a little sad I didn't track down the appropriate bathroom and take a selife when I was there recently.

          1. grrizzly   10 years ago

            I visited the bathroom in 2007.

            1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

              Is there a plaque or something?

              I had no idea how the toe-tapping/wide-stance thing worked until I saw an x-tube video about it a few months ago. I was so confused by the news coverage.

  7. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    "The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration wants to stick a breathalyzer in everybody's car. Yes, really."

    I wonder if, after a night of brussels sprouts, I could shut the car down.

    1. Brett L   10 years ago

      Well, I figure I can drive a classic car everywhere for the rest of my life.

      1. Entropy Void   10 years ago

        Just try and find one after Cash for Clunkers ... "Your Tax Dollars at Work!"

  8. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    The country is replacing explicit capital controls introduced after the 2008 crash with a 39 percent exit tax.

    But will their currency still be wool sweater based?

    1. JW   10 years ago

      It'll be 3 Bjorks to the dollar.

      1. PBR Streetgang   10 years ago

        Bjorks give us many clues into Human Behavior.

      2. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

        It'll be 3 Bjorks to the dollar.

        If the currency drops low enough, you will see a new tourism revolving around an activity called "bjorking". This activity will be similar to "borking", but will be more physical in nature.

    2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

      The important question is "will they tank their economy and make it uber-cheap to visit?"

      1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

        I got my Greece vacation planned. I'm just waiting for them to go back on the Drachma!

        1. Libertarian   10 years ago

          Good thinking. Wonder what it'd cost to rent an apartment over there?

          1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

            I'm assuming the black market will operate in dollars. Or ouzo. Either way it's a win.

        2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          If anywhere interesting's economy collapses before I get my savings back up to international travel levels I will be quite cross.

          I wonder if there's a disaster tourism forum someplace. Maybe a travel agency or something.

          1. Sudden   10 years ago

            You better work on that savings quickly. Spain is gonna be accelerating towards fiscal armageddon in a matter of days.

            1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

              I dunno, I'm kind of intimidated by how attractive Spaniards are. If there economy collapses I'll put a moratorium on my spending moratorium. It would be incredibly lame of me to not even try.

          2. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

            I thought you were running a disaster tourism forum. Here.

            1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

              I go to ONE tropical paradise during a cyclone...

      2. Ted S.   10 years ago

        A lot of Icelanders don't want more tourism. The place has become popular enough since the 2008 crisis that the natives think it's getting overrun.

        1. Episiarch   10 years ago

          Except tourism is the vast majority of their business. I didn't notice any of the proprietors of the stores and restaurants on Laugavegur having a problem with it last time I was there (which was last year).

          1. Ted S.   10 years ago

            My understanding is that the people making money directly off of tourism obviously want more; the others are more uncertain. Who wants to live in a tourist trap?

            1. Episiarch   10 years ago

              Anyone who decides to live in downtown Reykjavik?

          2. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

            Oh... That's about the time they started introducing legislation regarding the worship of Elves, isn't it?

            Tell me, Epi, are you a big man - roomy?

            Or are you a slender androgynous type of fellow with slightly pointed ears?

            Do you play ping pong in Seattle parks?

            /asking to further common knowledge

            1. Episiarch   10 years ago

              To put it simply, Chuck: I smell terrific.

      3. Sudden   10 years ago

        Nah, the uber ride there will still cost a goddamned fortune.

      4. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

        Jesse just wants to hunt for and bag Haf??r J?l?us Bj?rnsson.

        1. Warty   10 years ago

          Yeah, Jesse. Uh, "Jesse" does. Yeah. Yeah, that's the ticket.

          1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

            Whatever, dude. I'll let you cuddle with him occasionally.

            1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

              I think there is enough of him to go around.

            2. Warty   10 years ago

              YOU WILL LET ME HAVE HIM WHENEVER I WANT

              1. Sudden   10 years ago

                Let?

                When did this new affirmative consent Warty emerge? There is no surer sign of the end times.

                1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

                  I don't think "affirmative consent" means jesse consents to Warty man-loving a third party. At least, not usually.

              2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                I was going to say "you're going to have to wrestle my champion, Haf??r if you want him" but then realized it amounts to the same thing.

                1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

                  No one puts Haf??r in a headlock!

                  1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

                    According to H&R lore, you'd try, "Iron Jaw" Nikki.

                2. Sudden   10 years ago

                  Fear not Jesse, I'll go Oberyn Martell on Warty to defend the chastity of the Mountain/Mounting

                3. Sudden   10 years ago

                  Fear not Jesse, I'll go Oberyn Martell on Warty to defend the chastity of the Mountain/Mounting

                  1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                    Warty and I are just negotiating here. By the end of the thread there'll be a Jesse/Haf??r/Warty threeway and everyone will feel like a winner, except maybe Haf??r, but you know those Europeans, they're up for watever.

                    Related: Why We're Suspending the "Run Warren Run" Campaign

                    1. Sudden   10 years ago

                      Related: Why We're Suspending the "Run Warren Run" Campaign

                      Two things: I still remain convinced that Lizzie enters eventually. No one wants Clinton and no democrat wants a cishetero white man. Also, I may be moving soon and per the details of the wager, relocation nullifies the original terms.

                    2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                      I'll have to pull my copy from the safe. Was this part of subsection B?

    3. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

      Um, their currency is rotten-fish-based. Read some L?xness, dude.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        I don't speak Hopelandic.

        1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

          This is why there are no Icelandic libertarians.

      2. Raven Nation   10 years ago

        Enjoyed Paradise Reclaimed have Independent People on the "to read" list.

        1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

          Independent People is a hell of a book. Damn.

    4. expat   10 years ago

      I'm reminded of a chapter of the "Hitchhikers Guide" in which a planet is described that requires you to get receipt for each of your, um, "bathroom trips". If your mass upon arriving is greater that when leaving, they extract the appropriate "pounds of flesh".

      Do I get the point?

      1. SusanM   10 years ago

        +42

    5. Libertarian   10 years ago

      Will global warming force Iceland to change its name?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        We already have a Greenland.

      2. Knarf Yenrab!   10 years ago

        I would consider investing in real estate in a place called Slushland.

  9. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    Get your money out of Iceland while you can! The country is replacing explicit capital controls introduced after the 2008 crash with a 39 percent exit tax. How many gold coins can you stuff into your shoes?

    Iceland is a whole lot dumber than I thought it was.

  10. Rich   10 years ago

    The technology includes a steering wheel-mounted breathalyser and an engine start button that detects blood alcohol level via an infrared light. If the system detects the driver is over the limit it will refuse to start the car.

    What could *possibly* go wrong?

    1. Ted S.   10 years ago

      Nothing, if you're an authoritarian.

    2. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

      If it saves just one child's life....

    3. Rich   10 years ago

      They've left out position-change monitoring of the driver. This is all for naught.

      1. adifferentken   10 years ago

        That is deliberate, otherwise they would lose their rationalization for DUI checkpoints.

    4. MJGreen   10 years ago

      It's a regulation that can finally bring the cab companies and Uber together.

    5. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

      the "limit" is what is important. The morning after you have a few drinks is a common time for a fail reading, which would not allow you to start the car.

    6. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

      I certainly hope this comes to pass. I'll already be marketing a $29.95 device which will allow anyone to defeat it.

      Rent Seeking FTW!

    7. Knarf Yenrab!   10 years ago

      Think of it as job creation for all those innovators who will manufacture co2-puffing devices.

  11. Andrew S.   10 years ago

    By administrative rule, the Obama administration plans to double the salary threshold, from $23,660 to as much as $52,000, below which workers must be paid overtime. That should get business expansion going, right?

    I give up. I'm finally convinced that Team Blue absolutely wants the economy to fail, and fail hard, so they can get their socialist wet dreams enacted.

    1. Mike M.   10 years ago

      I posted that overtime salary story in the links nearly a month ago by the way. I kind of feel like I should get a hat tip.

    2. Episiarch   10 years ago

      If Obama isn't going to have a positive legacy from passing Obamacare, maybe he's decided to have the most negative possible legacy instead? Infamy instead of fame? Because he seems absolutely dedicated to fucking the economy as hard as he possibly can. Maybe the economy hurt him terribly years ago?

      "You think I suck? Oh yeah? Well, I'm going to suck so hard I'm going to make Jimmy Carter look like Grover Cleveland in comparison! Take that!"

      1. tarran   10 years ago

        That's kind of what happened to Hilter according to Albert Speer.

        Speer wrote that once Hitler realized the war was lost, he wanted to make Germans suffer in fire for having failed him and themselves.

        1. Episiarch   10 years ago

          I could easily see that level of megalomania from Obama. Easily. Because at the end of the day, it's always about him.

      2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        One small hole in that argument though (I think). He keeps telling everyone how great the economy is and how he saved it. So why does he want to kill it?

        Obama is really making me thirsty.

        1. Raven Nation   10 years ago

          Didn't see the game; apart from the result, was it a good game?

          1. Ted S.   10 years ago

            Couldn't have been any less competitive than the Germany game.

          2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

            You talking about the Champions League?

            Yeah, it was a good game. Juve put up a good fight and were somewhat unlucky on two calls but all in all Barcelona were deserved champions.

            1. Raven Nation   10 years ago

              Thanks.

  12. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    Gun Story #1

    The Deadly Consequences of Draconian Gun Laws

  13. Mike M.   10 years ago

    Directive 11: Obama's secret Islamist plan.

    Behind the rise of ISIS, the Libyan Civil War, the unrest in Egypt, Yemen and across the region may be a single classified document.

    That document is Presidential Study Directive 11.

    You can download Presidential Study Directive 10 on "Preventing Mass Atrocities" from the White House website, but as of yet no one has been able to properly pry number 11 out of Obama Inc...

    What little we know about the resulting classified 18-page report is that it used euphemisms to call for aiding Islamist takeovers in parts of the Middle East. Four countries were targeted. Of those four, we only know for certain that Egypt and Yemen were on the list. But we do know for certain the outcome...

    According to a New York Times story, Obama's Directive 11 agenda appeared to resemble Che or Castro as he "pressed his advisers to study popular uprisings in Latin America, Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia to determine which ones worked and which did not."

    The story also noted that he "is drawn to Indonesia, where he spent several years as a child, which ousted its longtime leader, Suharto, in 1998."

  14. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    Gun Story #2 - read this, go home, clean your gun, and check your ammo stockpile.

    Bernie Sanders is right: It's time for democratic socialism

    Thus, democratic socialism would fully abolish the signature feature of all labor markets: the coercion of labor through the threat of starvation.

    LOL. Democratic socialism replaces "No work, no food" to "No work, yes food".

    Nations like Denmark have a lower per-capita GDP than the U.S. due to a collective choice to work less.

    78 Danish cents to the 1 US Dollar! Discrimination!

    This is not as extreme as it sounds. You'll still be able to own a computer, clothes, and a home under democratic socialism. But private property that is plainly negative to society, such as extraction rights in buried carbon, will have to be eventually extinguished if the human race is going to survive. The point is that common human welfare is more important than an absolute right to ownership.

    I'm sure he snickered and thought of guns, but left it out while typing this derp.

    1. Rich   10 years ago

      private property that is plainly negative to society

      Like your fugly eyeglasses, Senator?

    2. Paul.   10 years ago

      "No work, no food" to "No work, yes food".

      Nope, they replace it with "yes work, no food".

    3. Brett L   10 years ago

      Will this be National Democratic Socialism?

    4. Libertarian   10 years ago

      I'm confused. Why wouldn't they just call it "national socialism"?

    5. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

      It always pleases me to imagine people like the author of that piece ending up like NKVD chiefs Nikoli Yezhov and Lavrentiy Beria: betrayed by their own cult leaders and literally dragged kicking and wailing to the courtyard to receive a bullet behind the ear.

      If things have to go to shit like that at least the architects will be destroyed along with it.

    6. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      Property rights would be subordinated to the general welfare of the polity, as just one concern among many. Those that do not harm society can stay, while those that do will be curtailed or abolished.

      Who decides what property rights harm society? (rhetorical...)

      1. MJGreen   10 years ago

        Fuck the polity. And fuck this twat.

    7. Riven   10 years ago

      The point is that common human welfare is more important than an absolute right to ownership.

      Oh, FFS. You can't have common human welfare without right to ownership!

    8. MJGreen   10 years ago

      You'll still be able to own a computer, clothes, and a home under democratic socialism.

      Whew! Thanks, master!

    9. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

      Holy shit:

      "Without the threat of penury and starvation, why would anyone spend their working lives in a capitalist's factory or coal mine?"

      Great plan! Let's make it so no one ever mines coal or works in a factory. I can see this having no negative consequences.

      1. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

        Also, he actually quotes Jacobin magazine at the end of the article.

        Fucking Jacobin. This guy is an actual commie.

    10. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

      I'm sure he snickered and thought of guns

      He's actually better than 99% of Dems on 2A stuff.

      1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

        I was actually talking about the author, not the New Democrat Messiah.

    11. Red Rocks Rockin   10 years ago

      The point is that common human welfare is more important than an absolute right to ownership.

      It's been remarked on before how Marx intended for the state to replace religion as the core social component that bound communities together. This is just another example of how socialists/Marxists equate government with religion without an ounce of understanding as to the proper function of either in high-trust communities. It's not an accident that Bernie's sounding like a horrifying mishmash of secular Marxist and tent revival preacher.

  15. Derpetologist   10 years ago

    When there's somethin' dumb...in your neighborhood
    Who ya gonna call?
    DERPBUSTERS!

    More gems from rationalwiki

    On Reason magazine:

    The comments section on Reason's "Hit and Run" rivals Yahoo! News for being the worst hive of scum and villiany on the Internet, and provides plenty of evidence to conclude that Web 2.0 with its "anyone can comment on anything" model perhaps isn't such a good idea.

    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Reason

    1. JW   10 years ago

      I'll take that as a compliment.

    2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      That's all lone wacko.

    3. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      Ah, Rational Wiki. At least their page on Jack Chick is funny. Introduced me to a great Cthulhu parody of his work. But man, is there a lot of derp there.

    4. Tonio   10 years ago

      Well done, people. rationalwiki is part of the Ph*ryngula collective, right?

    5. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

      The HnR comments section is just about the only one I can tolerate.

    6. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

      From a wiki? They think feel they have the moral high ground???

    7. Rich   10 years ago

      the worst hive of scum and villiany on the Internet

      H&R! H&R! H&R!

    8. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Got a chance to read that.

      I for one feel...honored.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    ...the Obama administration plans to double the salary threshold, from $23,660 to as much as $52,000, below which workers must be paid overtime.

    Unions must be exempt, as they have the unique ability to negotiate contracts that benefit both parties.

  17. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

    By administrative rule, the Obama administration plans to double the salary threshold, from $23,660 to as much as $52,000

    Where does this even come from? Do they just get a bunch of people sitting around in a big circle and ask "So, what do we feel like sticking our fingers in this week? I think it's Frank's turn to decide..."?

    1. Brett L   10 years ago

      "My isiot brother-in-law makes $48000 a year and had to work 42 hours one week and didn't get OT! Can you believe it?!

      1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

        Wait, will the internet sites that you can get $76 an hour by working only a few hours of week and my payzcheck last week was $4,000 have to start paying OT?

    2. Puddin' Stick   10 years ago

      They're channelling Herbert Hoover.

  18. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    Turkey's authoritarian president received a whack to the noggin when voters stripped his Justice and Development Party of its parliamentary majority.

    Why do Turks hate Justice?

    Why do Turks hate Development?

  19. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

    "By administrative rule, the Obama administration plans to double the salary threshold, from $23,660 to as much as $52,000, below which workers must be paid overtime. That should get business expansion going, right?"

    Business expansion is not something they understand practically or in the abstract (e.g. conditions necessary for a decision to expand). All they understand is a means to an end; a zero sum calculation whereby they 'see' their income/salary increase but completely blind or oblivious to what can happen around it (e.g. less hours, no expansion etc.).

    Business expansion is something that just magically happens no matter how much burden they put on it via 'administrative' policies.

    In other words, they're a bunch of pseudo-commies.

    1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

      They're working hard to drop the "pseudo"

  20. Rich   10 years ago

    Commonly used and unregulated internet discussions and videos about guns and ammo could be closed down under rules proposed by the State Department

    State is demanding that anyone who puts technical details about arms and ammo on the web first get the OK from the federal government ? or face a fine of up to $1 million and 20 years in jail

    Well, if you can't ban guns, ban talking about 'em.

    1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

      You can talk about them. Just not to dirty foreigners.

      1. tarran   10 years ago

        Oh thanks, Nikki! We really needed someone to tell us what Tulpa would say on this topic!

      2. Andrew S.   10 years ago

        Does that mean we're going to have to kick out Rufus?

      3. Andrew S.   10 years ago

        Does that mean we're going to have to kick out Rufus?

        1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

          Or at least the dirty squirrels?

        2. Tonio   10 years ago

          Canadians are not real foreigners.

          1. Xeones   10 years ago

            Rufus certainly is dirty, though.

            1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

              If you mean dirty in my mind, then guilty as charged!

              That's right Tonio, we're fake foreigners!

    2. Brett L   10 years ago

      I though DD already won this fight.

      1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

        Brand new rule allegedly about "export."

        1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

          Oh wait, my bad, it's not a new rule. No, no, they're just clarifying the old rule. To mean...what it always meant...

          1. Brett L   10 years ago

            huh. I could swear the courst told State they had no leg to stand on.

            1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

              Well that's why you clarify the rule...

    3. The Last American Hero   10 years ago

      What about discussions of the technical aspects of guns that the State Dept sold to Syrian rebels that wound up in the hands of ISIS?

  21. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration wants to stick a breathalyzer in everybody's car.

    Secret Service agents hardest hit.

    1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

      I had one in my vehicle for three years.

      I almost went to jail because the windshield wiper fluid set it off.

      I think it is a wonderful idea.

      1. Riven   10 years ago

        Why were you drinking windshield wiper fluid?

        1. Xeones   10 years ago

          Because it's sterile, and he likes the taste!

          1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

            Thank you, it is much like urine in a way.

        2. Brett L   10 years ago

          Because the fluid in the windshield washer reservoir was vodka.

  22. rts   10 years ago

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper agrees to G7 'decarbonization' by 2100

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper has agreed to a G7 commitment to deep cuts in carbon emissions by 2050 ? with an eventual stop in the use of fossil fuels by the end of the century.

    Good luck with that.

    1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

      2100?

      In other words, Harper kicked the can really hard down the road.

    2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      I like Harper better when he is a denier pissing off progs.

    3. Libertarian   10 years ago

      What could possibly go wrong? It would be like someone in 1930 dictating how things should be done today.

    4. Ted S.   10 years ago

      So we'll all become silicon-based life forms?

    5. Emmerson Biggins   10 years ago

      Carbon DIOXIDE, mother fuckers.

  23. Paul.   10 years ago

    OT: Group of homeowners decry 'eastern bloc' style housing, demand everyone build houses based on a 'character' that THEY want to impose.

    Irony of 'Stalinism' utterly lost.

    But more than one person who slammed the legislation, claiming it wouldn't do enough to halt out-of-character development, said the council will determine whether Seattle remains a garden city or acquires a bland, Stalinist cityscape.

    "Stop this city from looking like an Eastern Bloc city," said Imogen Love, of Ballard.

    http://www.seattletimes.com/se.....cityscape/

    1. Episiarch   10 years ago

      I think the "garden city" is going the way of the dodo considering that every fucking empty lot or fallow plot in the city (at least in downtown, SLU, Belltown, Queen Anne, Capitol Hill, and First Hill) is being turned into a highrise because of our insane construction boom right now.

      Hey, cities change. Can you believe that?

    2. Warty   10 years ago

      Councilmembers Kshama Sawant and Nick Licata, who dropped in on the committee for the hearing, also expressed support,

      *snickers*

      1. Paul.   10 years ago

        Sawant (socialist) and Licata (fabianist) want to see more Social Realist art around the city.

  24. Rich   10 years ago

    Obama: 'We don't yet have a complete strategy' against ISIS

    WARNING: Audio auto start

    Obama said the Pentagon has yet to submit a "finalized" plan "because it requires commitments on the part of the Iraqis as well about how recruitment takes place, how that training takes place. The details of that are not yet worked out."

    No plan survives contact with the enemy, Mr. President.

    1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

      Complete strategy?

      Did he have a strategy to begin with?

      An unnecessary adjective once removed that shows the truth.

      1. Rich   10 years ago

        "Then, we're going to *lock and load*."

    2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Wow. Wow. Wow. And since the DOJ is apparently monitoring us (yoo-hoo I'm Canadian you can't touch me!) all I will say is this is one 'special' President you got there.

  25. Derpetologist   10 years ago

    Mental giants at work!

    Typically libertarians argue that people should be free to do whatever they like as long as it doesn't hurt others. While this idea may seem very simple at first glance, the problem is that what "hurts" people and what doesn't is very nuanced. For instance, it is common for libertarians to oppose laws which reduce air pollution even though the latter can have a severe impact on the health of others, even if it is assumed that global warming is a gummint conspiracy to justify raising our taxes; more so than many direct acts of violence. It is also common for them to oppose laws mandating car drivers to wear seatbelts, even though seeing a person die as the result of not wearing one can have a major psychological effect on onlookers. Similarly, they may oppose anti-smoking campaigns as an unwarranted intrusion on personal liberty, while ignoring the financial burden imposed by smoking-related illnesses on both private insurance and taxpayer-funded health care.

    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Libertarian#Simple.3F

    1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

      even though seeing a person die as the result of not wearing one can have a major psychological effect on onlookers

      This is one of my favorite statist arguments of all time.

      1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

        This is why a society of wusses is so dangerous.

      2. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

        For instance, it is common for libertarians to oppose laws which reduce air pollution even though the latter can have a severe impact on the health of others, even if it is assumed that global warming is a gummint conspiracy to justify raising our taxes...

        Hmm... I seem to recall a scholar who had something to say on situations like air pollution. Richard Coats? Randall Cutts? Nevermind, I must be mistaken, there aren't any libertarian theories on how to deal with air pollution. If we had our way, every city would be like Shanghai.

        1. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

          crap, this was supposed to go under the Derpmeister's post.

          But I like your post, too, Nikki.

      3. Xeones   10 years ago

        Oh my god, those poor mental children.

      4. Scruffy Nerfherder   10 years ago

        It is truly a wonder to behold. There's got to be a name for it. The PTSD Externality Effect?

        1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

          I call it "the dad argument" because my dad makes it. That probably wouldn't work as well for others.

      5. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

        Some people have a negative psychological effect when they see a transsexual. Clearly we should make it illegal for transsexuals to be out of the closet based on their potential to upset people.

        1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

          Externalities are magical that way.

        2. Episiarch   10 years ago

          What about people who are the worst? They have a tremendous negative psychological effect.

      6. MJGreen   10 years ago

        This is the first time I've ever seen such an argument. That's a very special kind of idiocy.

    2. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      Why do you hate yourself so?

      (their article on Cato is equally as horrible)

    3. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

      For instance, it is common for libertarians to oppose laws which reduce air pollution even though the latter can have a severe impact on the health of others

      I'm not sure that is true.

      1. Rich   10 years ago

        Are you calling *rationalwiki* a LIAR?!

        1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

          Liar, irredeemably stupid...take your pick.

    4. Jerry on the sea   10 years ago

      Again, let us point out that Ayn Rand gave herself lung cancer and then took Medicare payments without blinking an eye. (footnote)

      If The Onion was ever to make a wiki site...

  26. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

    Important follow-up to a weekend story (from Irish? maybe Serious? sorry bros):

    I wonder at some assumptions that you seem to make; I question the degree to which you elevate your race and gender as if they are the most salient features of your artistic identity; and I do not see any reason to think that your poems will cause anyone to pay less attention to verse written by poets with different racial or gender identities.

    1. John   10 years ago

      I would love to ask that guy why he doesn't just kill himself. As long as he lives he is taking a job and wealth from the higher gender and races. And if he kills himself, there is no danger of him changing his mind and writing more poetry and taking up space from them. If he killed himself he would no longer be a problem.

      1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

        I guess you have to figure out the perfect balancing act of getting a job that is good enough for you to be a net taxpayer, thus subsidizing folks via the state, but bad enough that you don't feel like you're taking their jobs. Sounds like a challenge.

        1. Rich   10 years ago

          Ooh, ooh! Run for public office!

    2. Paul.   10 years ago

      I for one am glad that someone is finally taking on white male poets.

      1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

        I believe playa posted this a few months ago, but these...poets...are not much better.

        1. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

          Am I the only one thinking "Nice rack" about the one in the flower dress?

          And, "selling OUR bodies"??? I don't recall Anheuser-Busch putting you in any ads..

          1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

            Since these threads are being watched you are probably going to have to testify in court about whether or not you really thought she had a nice rack.

            And no, you are not the only one thinking that.

            1. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

              "Do you swear or affirm that the testimony-"
              "I'm sorry-"firm" what?"

        2. Libertarian   10 years ago

          You'd think a poet in the comments would, um, have a better way to phrase this than they way they did:

          Thank you all! On behalf of all four of us, our poetry coach, and our one additional MALE MEMBER, we are overwhelmingly happy with the response to this piece. Thank you thank you for the support!

          1. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

            our one additional MALE MEMBER

            So, that's how they roll? They limit themselves to one dick? Is this a time-share deal, or something along those lines?

        3. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

          Pul off the visard that Poets maske in, you shall disclose their reproch, bewray their vanitie, loth their wantonnesse, lament their follie, and perceiue their sharpe sayings to be placed as Pearles in Dunghils, fresh pictures on rotten walles, chaste Matrons apparel on common Curtesans...

          Poetrie and pyping, haue allwaies bene so vnited togither, that til the time of Melanippides were Poets hyerlings. But marke I pray you, how they are now both abused... We haue infinite Poets, and Pipers, and suche peeuish cattel among vs in Englande, that liue by merrie begging, mainteyned by almes, and priuily encroch vppon euerie mans purse.

    3. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

      Wasn't me and from the read of it, thank God I didn't sully my weekend with it.

    4. Sunmonocle Backwards Tophat   10 years ago

      The rap bit at the end is too tortured, though. I think that was meant to tell us more about the author than the topic. Maybe I just missed the point.

      1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

        I disagree; I think it's a great point. Anyone who thinks there aren't a lot of black voice in contemporary poetry is insanely wrong. If anyone is marginalized in that cultural sphere, it's white dudes.

        1. Sunmonocle Backwards Tophat   10 years ago

          I see. I guess that makes sense. I've never considered rap to be poetry, or rock 'n roll for that matter, but it's probably a form thing.

    5. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

      That was me. Also, I'd love for this 'White male poet' to tell me of anything he's ever actually written. I have a sneaking suspicion he's published maybe 3 poems of low quality in shitty poetry journals and calls himself a poet largely out of an inflated sense of ego.

      1. Sunmonocle Backwards Tophat   10 years ago

        What group would he be signaling? I can't think of anyone who would be impressed by someone who refers to himself as a poet. What's the threshold at which you can define yourself by your activity, anyway? I usually stop at occupation; anything else remains a verb.

        1. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

          "What group would he be signaling?"

          Seriously? You can't imagine some hipster neckbeard gazing up at some cute barista from beneath his hornrimmed glasses and saying "I'm sorry. I can't talk now. I'm composing my poetry" before assuring himself that she was totally impressed by his devotion to his art?

          1. Episiarch   10 years ago

            Irish, are you sure you should be revealing your secrets to seduction like that?

  27. GILMORE   10 years ago

    "Sen. Bernie Sanders (I but really D-Vt.) took 41 percent in a Wisconsin straw poll, holding Hillary Clinton to 49 percent."

    There are people who interpret this as signs of "strength in diversity".

    I fully encourage them.

  28. Derpetologist   10 years ago

    And finally, what does rationalwiki think of John Stossel?

    If you can believe it, Stossel was actually once an upstanding advocacy journalist in his early career on 20/20, exposing corruption and fraud in both the public and private sectors. In 1998, Stossel also hosted a prime time special, The Power of Belief, challenging quack, New Age, and supernatural claims. That special also featured interviews with magician-turned-skeptic James Randi.[4] Since his conversion to libertarianism, however, he mostly deals in Reaganism, global warming denialism, and general fact distortion.[5] Unfortunately, due to his frequent criticism of various forms of woo, he has suckered other skeptics into appearing with him to promote his laissez-faire bullshit and denialism.

    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/J.....ite_note-5

    1. Tonio   10 years ago

      Yes, that scares them. Good.

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        Rationalwiki is not so rational.

    2. Paul.   10 years ago

      Stossel was actually once an upstanding advocacy journalist in his early career on 20/20, exposing corruption and fraud in both the public and private sectors. In 1998, Stossel also hosted a prime time special, The Power of Belief, challenging quack, New Age, and supernatural claims.

      He's still doing that.

    3. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

      So, John Stossel (1998): "I'm skeptical" = good, but, John Stossel (2015): "I'm skeptical" = bad?

      Make up your minds, assholes!!

      1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

        "Skeptical" when agreeing with us on everything = good
        "Skeptical" when not agreeing with us on everything = bad

        1. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

          "Well, he's certainly not a principal!"

    4. GILMORE   10 years ago

      Rationalwiki is full of expressions like "Buttload" and adjectives like "bullshit"

      It doesn't seem like the writings of "Rational" people so much as pretentious college kids.

      i.e. being biased is one thing, but being unprofessionally biased is just sloppy

      1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        Reality-based rationality!

      2. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

        being unprofessionally biased is just sloppy

        Hey, now-the "Smartest Guys In The Room" don't have to apologize! Not to you, or anyone else!!

      3. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

        Rationalwiki is full of expressions like "Buttload" and adjectives like "bullshit"

        Well, so is Nick's.

      4. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        Hipster think they're soooo rational. I mean, like, they roll their eyes when they debate and such like the I-raq.

    5. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

      They should rename their site to emotionalwiki

    6. MJGreen   10 years ago

      Reaganism. That's even better than denialism.

  29. GILMORE   10 years ago

    "Get your money out of Iceland while you can!"

    Haven't capital controls been proven again and again to simply accelerate capital flight?

    Where or when has it ever worked? because there are still always legal ways to liquidate your domestic assets and buy things elsewhere.

    1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

      How do you say "Hawala" in Icelandic?

      1. GILMORE   10 years ago

        hawala

        true story =

        I have previously recounted my epic tale of being laid-over in iceland on their national holiday, "Beer Day".

        When we wandered into the first bar, and had no idea why the entire country was drunk, we were given a brief explanatory lecture by 2 huge blonde guys as they shoved the first of 100 beers into our hands.

        These 2 guys also became our impromptu tour guides, who proceeded to drag us from one location to another over the course of the next 16 hours, getting increasingly, dangerously intoxicated.

        I asked the guy's names at the beginning, and it sounded something like the Swedish-Chef, "hergleburglederglesheefeendeefeen". I asked if there was an English translation, and the guy pondered, "Yes. 'Weapon of God'" So i called him "Lethal Weapon". His buddy was just called Karl, or something. The evening ended* when I passed out on stage while performing "Hound Dog" with a country-music band.

        (*for me)

        1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

          LOL. That was really funny.

          Lethal Weapon is a really funny nickname.

  30. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration wants to stick a breathalyzer in everybody's car. Yes, really.

    But the slippery slope argument is a fallacy.

    1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      But they say they want it to be an OPTION! It's totally not going to become mandatory!

      1. Rich   10 years ago

        Pilot-test it in NHTSA vehicles.

      2. John   10 years ago

        And it would never keep records that would later be accessed by the cops. Never. The NTSA respects your privacy too much for that to happen.

      3. Riven   10 years ago

        Why would anyone actually opt in to that?

        1. John   10 years ago

          Two reasons. People will do it on cars they buy for their teenagers and the insurance companies will no doubt charge the living shit out of you if you don't do it.

    2. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      Why not just stream all sorts of data straight to the NSA and law enforcement? Location, mental and physical state, anything said in the vehicle, etc.

      1. Paul.   10 years ago

        They already have that. They want to extend it to your breath.

        1. Rich   10 years ago

          What are stools, chopped liver?

          1. Libertarian   10 years ago

            Do I really have to answer this one?

          2. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

            Well, chopped and digested liver, sometimes, yes.

        2. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          Why not sample DNA while they at it?

          1. Paul.   10 years ago

            *taking notes*

            I'll send this up the flagpole at the next meeting!

            There are no wrong answers here, Pro L.

          2. Riven   10 years ago

            Hey, my apartment complex recently started a DNA testing program for dog poop. Don't joke about that shit.

          3. Rich   10 years ago

            "You'll feel a prick."

            1. Unreconstructed   10 years ago

              What is "Least favorite line to hear in Warty's dungeon"?

  31. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

    So how does affirmative consent affect art (and no, I'm not talking about Sulkowicz)?

    The period I study, modernism, is flush with women characters who complicate the "no means no" approach to defining sexual violence. For example, Anna in Jean Rhys's Voyage in the Dark naively enters into a relationship with an older man; after having a falling out with him and losing her job, she meets another man ostensibly to do his nails. When he confesses, "Oh, don't worry about the manicure [?] I only wanted to talk to you," she does not protest. Saying no would not change the situation, so she limits her participation in the discussion: "When he touched me I knew that he was quite sure I would. I thought, 'All right then, I will.'" Is this Anna's "folly," to use Eliot's language, or is this rape? And why was this never asked in a graduate seminar?

    1. Rich   10 years ago

      why was this never asked in a graduate seminar?

      Indeed, isn't that very question a form of rape?

    2. Riven   10 years ago

      complicate the "no means no" approach to defining sexual violence

      Gosh, maybe sexual situations are just a little more nuanced than the narrative allows?

    3. John   10 years ago

      No one is mentioning, mostly because journalists don't know enough to understand what is going on, that affirmative consent turns rape into a general intent crime. Traditionally, rape is a specific intent crime. That means the person has to intend to rape and mistake of fact regarding consent was a defense. After consent does away with all of that. With affirmative consent, two people can be going at it and the woman suddenly decide she doesn't want to do it but not say anything and just lay there and if the guy goes ahead and has sex with her he is guilty of rape. You can be guilty of rape even though you reasonably thought the person was consenting.

      1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

        So you're saying the affirmative consent standard is necessary to bring rape in line with the rest of the contemporary mens-rea-free legal climate?

        1. John   10 years ago

          I suppose you could say that. But it makes up for it by effectively ending the right to demand proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Again, these issues are just technical enough that journalists are not bright enough to understand them. So it never gets explained to the public.

    4. Paul.   10 years ago

      'All right then, I will.'" Is this Anna's "folly," to use Eliot's language, or is this rape? And why was this never asked in a graduate seminar?

      Uhhhhhhh.

  32. Andrew S.   10 years ago

    Um, guys? According to Popehat... we're being watched here in the comments.

    1. iCarl   10 years ago

      Ruh-roh.

    2. Riven   10 years ago

      Nothing to hide, eggs, omelets, etc.

    3. Brett L   10 years ago

      Hmm. It appears I won't be eligible for the inevitable taxpayer funded settlement. 🙁

    4. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Did he call us blowhards?

      US?!

      1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

        Just the stupid blowhards.

      2. Paul.   10 years ago

        Not just us, but you Rufus... you.

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          /takes Super Man stance.

    5. GILMORE   10 years ago

      "DOJ is targeting Reason.com, a leading libertarian website whose clever writing is eclipsed only by the blowhard stupidity of its commenting peanut gallery.

      Why are the government using its vast power to identify these obnoxious asshats, and not the other tens of thousands who plague the internet?"

      I like to think its my good-looks.

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        I think they really come for the recipes.

      2. Derpetologist   10 years ago

        "Why are the government using its vast power to identify these obnoxious asshats, and not the other tens of thousands who plague the internet?"

        Because the thing petty tyrants hate the most is being mocked.

        And "obnoxious asshats"?!

        I RESEMBLE THAT REMARK!

        1. Bam!   10 years ago

          "Obnoxious asshat" would make an excellent handle.

      3. John   10 years ago

        Ken White, whoever he is, is an idiot.

        1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

          Ken White is a national treasure, despite his distaste for us. He might be the best advocate for first amendment absolutism anywhere.

          And the @Popehat twitter account is always great.

        2. db   10 years ago

          You're kidding, right?

          1. John   10 years ago

            Was he kidding when he said everyone who posts on here is an idiot?

        3. Paul.   10 years ago

          Take heart, John, he may not have been talking about YOU. I know he wasn't talking about me.

          *looks around nervously*

          right? Right guys?

          1. John   10 years ago

            Of course he was talking about me. The entire universe does revolve around me doesn't it?

            1. Ted S.   10 years ago

              More likely everybody knows what an idiot you are? :-p

              /sarcasm

        4. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

          Ken White is awesome and you should bite your tongue and apologize.

          1. John   10 years ago

            I won't. He writes some decent things. But if he thinks Reason's articles are that cleverly written and really has that low of an opinion of the people who comment here, he is not that bright. I am sorry he is just not.

            I am not as easily impressed as you people are.

            1. Sidd Finch v2.01   10 years ago

              Yea, the comments are far better than the blog posts.

            2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

              I kinda agree with John.

              The thing about this place is the comments are wildly varied and nuanced going from utter idiocy to sublime intelligence. It's what makes us the superior commenting race. The sheer collection of personalities and experiences is nothing like I've seen anywhere.

              If he can't see that - assuming he only glosses over it with an elitist eye - then screw him with the Pope's Hat.

              1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

                Like I said, assuming he's serious.

              2. Paul.   10 years ago

                The thing about this place is the comments are wildly varied and nuanced going from utter idiocy to sublime intelligence. It's what makes us the superior commenting race.

                Agree with this assessment. There's nothing worse than a stuffy, staid commenting forum where everyone comes off sounding like an overeducated fop.

                I'd rather be in a place where the comments run the full gamut as opposed to the filtered, selected and heavily moderated fare.

            3. Paul.   10 years ago

              What do you mean "you people"?

            4. Riven   10 years ago

              The articles are nice.

              The comments (and the commenters) are what makes me come back.

              1. Sudden   10 years ago

                Which one of us do you secretly have a major crush on Riven?

                1. Riven   10 years ago

                  Gasp! They've found me out!

                  If I had a crush, it wouldn't be secret--I can promise you that. I'm notoriously a spastic flirt when I actually have skin in the game.

                2. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

                  I have to confess....

              2. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

                I read come to Reason for the pictures.

                1. GILMORE   10 years ago

                  GILMORE = "I came to Reason for the waters"
                  Claude Raines = "The Waters?! GILMORE, Reason is in the desert!"
                  GILMORE = "I was misinformed"

        5. GILMORE   10 years ago

          I suspect his vehement denunciations of the commentariat here are partly tongue-in-cheek (and partly true! we should be proud)

          unlike, say, Robby Soave's denunciation of speech he opposes that is clearly NOT OKAY, ...Ken @ popehat regularly goes to the mat in defense of free speech.

          I think in the context of the piece, you get a better feel for the satirical tone

          "If, like most of us, you're a lawyer with lawyer-friends and "a swarm of asshole lawbloggers" (Yes, I have such a swarm, and I'm KING BEE!) willing to stand at your back to defend your right to use silly hyperbole in criticizing government officials, it probably doesn't matter at all.

          Or maybe you're nice people. You use the internet to check email, which allows you to serve customers in a better fashion. You never comment on matters of public concern. Your email signature reads:

          HAVE A BLESSED DAY!

          But some of you aren't. You may have opinions, even strong opinions, but you're lower forms of life, maggots, pukes, nothing but grabasstic pieces of amphibian shit."

          Or, maybe he actually thinks H&R is full of mouthbreating TEAM RED Kulturwarriors who want to jump in their pickup trucks and save REAL AMERICA from faggy book lurnin' types like him.

          Either interpretation is possible

          1. John   10 years ago

            I am betting on t he latter.

            1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

              Based on a longer track record than that one post, I'm betting on the former.

              1. Paul.   10 years ago

                Note that PopeHat moderates its comments.

                Their comment base is a cesspool too, they just get deleted.

    6. Derpetologist   10 years ago

      L?se-majest?- not just for oriental monarchs anymore!

      1. Derpetologist   10 years ago

        Here is the visual aid wikipedia uses for the concept

        1. GILMORE   10 years ago

          Treason Magazine !

          1. Beautiful Bean Footage   10 years ago

            Drink! (hemlock)

    7. Paul.   10 years ago

      Huh, and the thread in question has been locked down. Too bad for the DOJ. The rudest comment about the judge was made by a Canadian.

    8. Ted S.   10 years ago

      At least they're trying to get a subpoena and not just using the NSA.

      1. Sudden   10 years ago

        At least they're trying to get a subpoena and not just in additional to using the NSA

        FIFY

    9. Sudden   10 years ago

      Well that's unsettling

    10. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

      Yeah, I'd really like to know how that threat came to their attention....

      1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

        Meant to say thread, not threat.

        1. Rich   10 years ago

          "Ah-HA!!"

      2. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

        More to the point, did Bo call it in or did it, did it get flagged by some bot or NSA program, or are there people getting paid to just monitor sites like this for thoughtcrime?

        1. Rich   10 years ago

          people getting paid to just monitor sites like this for thoughtcrime?

          That's just crazy talk. They monitor sites like this for human trafficking.

          1. Sudden   10 years ago

            Warty, that florist van that's been across the street for the last six months may indeed be based on our entirely fictional accounts of your proclivities. Sorry, buddy!

            1. Paul.   10 years ago

              There was a fed ex van across the street from my house every night for a few months. Funny how in this day and age, that kind of thing actually makes you nervous.

      3. GILMORE   10 years ago

        crazy mary is still out there.

        i would not put "swatting" past her.

        she's fucking obsessed.

        1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

          I forgot about Mary. Yeah, that wouldn't surprise me whatsoever.

        2. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

          Wow, she is a one-person (physically, at least) echo chamber of hate.

      4. Andrew S.   10 years ago

        It honestly would not shock me if PB/Tulpa/Bo/etc. did it.

        (the above is not to start a witch hunt. But assuming we're not being watched in an NSA style, somebody has to have called this to their attention. We're not THAT popular.)

        1. Episiarch   10 years ago

          I can't remember what thread it was, and don't have time right now to search, but hilariously enough, Tulpa once spent an entire thread, after he was told to go kill himself for being such a sockpuppeting loser, trying to insinuate that he could bring "the authorities" in over being told to go kill himself. I'm not joking. He really did that. In between whining about it.

          So, just some info for your speculations.

          1. John   10 years ago

            It is Tulpa's world. We just live in it.

            1. Warty   10 years ago

              The only power that fucking idiot has is over the poor freshmen who are too stupid to realize what an asshole he is and drop his Calc 1 class. Fuck him.

              1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

                Is he really a college professor? That's...sad.

      5. Paul.   10 years ago

        Me too. I'm guessing (hoping) that an angry, spurned commenter (tulpa/bo/mary stack) tipped them off.

        The only other alternative is that yes, in fact the administration is so afraid of us that we are on a watch list.

        1. John   10 years ago

          Someone tipped them off. Likely one of the crazy stalkers.

        2. Warty   10 years ago

          It's worth noting that we've seen our share of obvious agents provocateur here over the years. "Let's all talk about our plans to kill the police!" and so forth.

    11. Paul.   10 years ago

      Is it the position of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York that a reasonable reader would conclude that "Rhywun" is in league with the Dark Ones,

      Rhywun is in league with the Dark Ones.

      1. Libertarian   10 years ago

        That's racist.

        1. Catatafish   10 years ago

          And factually inaccurate. Everyone knows Rhywun is in league with the Octaroon Ones.

    12. Paul.   10 years ago

      Ok, guys, serious discussion time...

      Does this shit have a chilling effect?

      1. John   10 years ago

        Yes

      2. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

        Yes. It's legitimately scary.

      3. Sudden   10 years ago

        Maybe this is the sort of black swan event needed for us to finally be given an edit button?

        1. Rich   10 years ago

          Or a sarcasm font?

          1. SIV   10 years ago

            *BLINK TAGS*

      4. Andrew S.   10 years ago

        Without a doubt.

        I mean, we've dealt with something like that before, when that lawyer sued Reason for us in the comments discussing whether or not he engaged in fornication with sheep. But this is scary.

        1. Paul.   10 years ago

          This is scary, because these people can have you killed. That dipshit lawyer was just a gadfly who might have cost Reason some money.

      5. db   10 years ago

        Does the Pope wear a hat?

        1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

          Does the Pope shit in the woods?

          1. Riven   10 years ago

            Does the Pope shit in his hat?

            1. SimonJester   10 years ago

              Does a bear teach infallibly?

      6. Sidd Finch v2.01   10 years ago

        Yes. I would really like to hurl a bunch of stupid, harmless invective at these people. But nah. I'll just bitch IRL instead.

      7. Catatafish   10 years ago

        Abso-fucking-lutely.

      8. Pinky   10 years ago

        Islamic Jihad could learn a thing or two from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.

    13. Ted S.   10 years ago

      This would probably explain why Agammamon was looking for a lawyer in some of the other threads.

      1. Paul.   10 years ago

        Yarp.

      2. Sudden   10 years ago

        I don't believe he had any posts in that thread that would be targeted for incendiary rhetoric.

        1. Paul.   10 years ago

          Arguably, he/she had the MOST incendiary rhetoric.

        2. db   10 years ago

          One of his was specifically called out in the Popehat article.

          1. Sudden   10 years ago

            I revisited the thread and searched for his name. The comment mentioned in the popehat article has been deleted.

            1. Paul.   10 years ago

              I noticed that too.

        3. Ted S.   10 years ago

          Popehat quoted him.

      3. Sidd Finch v2.01   10 years ago

        He asked croaker to get in touch in last night's thread.

      4. Bam!   10 years ago

        He left this in the Popehat thread:

        Hello all ? I'm the 'Agammamon' from the article.

        "leading libertarian website whose clever writing is eclipsed only by the blowhard stupidity of its commenting peanut gallery."

        Yeah, that pretty much describes us ? the comments section of most any place is a cesspit and I'm one of the dwellers in the Reason.com comment sewer.

        I don't really have anything to say for myself ? my conduct in the cited thread was poor and below the standards I imagined I set for myself and, really, should be considered an embarrassment to libertarians in general.

        But, since its out and here, I would appreciate any help anyone could provide ? even if its a contact for a decent federal lawyer in New York.

        If this gets past the Grand Jury, it could be a difficult road for me as I live a long way from New York.

        1. Sudden   10 years ago

          Holy crap. Shit got real.

          Agammamon, if you're reading this and this BS continues roll along and threaten your freedom and livelihood, consider myself ready, willing, and able to donate to your legal defense fund. This is downright chilling.

          1. Catatafish   10 years ago

            Seconded.

          2. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

            Yeah, I'll second that.

            And while the comment was crass, there is a lot worse out there on the internet. If that comment is an embarrassment to libertarians then the entirety of the internet is an embarrassment to humanity in general.

            People say stupid emotional things, especially online. Agammamon shouldn't be too hard on himself. We've all been there.

          3. Paul.   10 years ago

            Thirded.

          4. Bam!   10 years ago

            Well, that comment just got zapped. Interesting.

          5. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

            Um, did the blockquote from the Popehat comment section just disappear?

            1. Ted S.   10 years ago

              Apparently yes.

              1. TheZeitgeist   10 years ago

                The squirrels just ate mine.

                Thanks Obama.

          6. Paul.   10 years ago

            Did we just have a post deleted?

            1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

              I guess we're not supposed to talk about this...

          7. Catatafish   10 years ago

            Well, this certainly isn't creepy AT ALL.

            1. Paul.   10 years ago

              Over/under on when this thread gets locked down?

              1. Catatafish   10 years ago

                I hate to say this but if I put my "sky is falling" lawyer hat on and we assume Reason is subject to a gag order, I'd be telling them that some douchecanoe AUSA might be willing to argue that, by not shutting down the comments, they were in effect facilitating them.

                I won't go over/under because that would make it a certainty (just a function of when) but I will say 50% chance this is locked when we all congregate in the morning.

            2. Bam!   10 years ago

              I would say something about how something is something even though something is available from something but I'm afraid the post will get deleted.

            3. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

              OK, 5 comments (including one from Agammamon) linking to either the popehat article or this very thread just got deleted from the overtime pay article....

      5. Catatafish   10 years ago

        Oh fuck. That's right. Southern District of New York.

    14. Bam!   10 years ago

      Why did the comment section of a relatively small magazine end up on some government lawyer's desk?

      1. Paul.   10 years ago

        Why not? When you wanna knock heads together, you gonna go to a pro-government, pro authority website?

        1. Bam!   10 years ago

          Just think: Some government stooge is getting paid to read Agile Cyborg.

          1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

            How many times has STEVE SMITH been investigated?

          2. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

            Although he probably reads SugarFree on his downtime. In his bunk.

          3. GILMORE   10 years ago

            "Some government stooge is getting paid to read Agile Cyborg."

            Somewhere, in the basement of the NSA, the files of "Operation Agile Cyborg" were being shredded

            1. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

              And, the ones who read it were openly weeping every day they showed up for work.

    15. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

      I'm also a little pissed that we're hearing about this from Popehat and not from Reason itself. But maybe there is some good reason (oops) for that. Popehat doesn't say who gave them the subpoena, after all....

      1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

        Popehat has the most likely answer:

        Of course, Reason and "Rhywun" may be under a gag order asserted on the "because I said so" non-existent authority of a wet-behind-the-ears mutton-headed Assistant United States Attorney, for whom a special place should be reserved in Hell, so don't expect answers.

        1. Bam!   10 years ago

          And: "I understand that Reason, on advice of counsel, may not be able to comment on these questions."

        2. Paul.   10 years ago

          I agree with this. Note again that thread has been locked. I'm guessing that freedom of speech blah blah, you don't talk about real, ongoing and pressing legal matters that aren't yet resolved.

    16. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      Did anyone really not assume we were? Some asshole at DOJ is being paid a shit load of stolen money to become intimately familiar with Big Lebowski and O Brother Where Art Thou quotes and the attractiveness of women of varying thickness.

      1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

        I joked about it. I sort of guessed that deep in some NSA server there was a few lines on me that no one would ever bother to look at (and I'm being serious on that). But to see action being taken...yikes.

    17. Paul.   10 years ago

      Ok, I'll be firrst to ask, we gonna set up a legal fund for our fellow commenters? I'll throw in a few bucks.

      1. Sudden   10 years ago

        Indeed.

        I also think we should all get together and do some sort of of "I am Spartacus" act of solidarity.

      2. grrizzly   10 years ago

        We absolutely should. I'll contribute too.

      3. Paul.   10 years ago

        I'm willing to do a GoFundMe, but I have no idea how it works, so I'll do some investigating tonight.

    18. Warty   10 years ago

      Are we really that bad? Well, I know all of you are. But I like to think of myself as a foulmouthed weeping clown. With, like, razor abs and a huge cock. And, like, a pony made of diamonds.

      1. Paul.   10 years ago

        And, like, a pony made of diamonds.

        Because you're rich?

        1. Warty   10 years ago

          I'm rackin' my brain trying to think of a name for that diamond pony I bought. I was gonna call it "piss-for-brains" in honor of you, but that just feels immature. Maybe..."Butt Stallion"? Nah, that's even worse. I'll give it some more thought.

          1. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

            +1 UVHM

    19. Steve G   10 years ago

      Does this mean the edit button will not be arriving in time for xmas???

      1. Paul.   10 years ago

        Nope, but a "your comment is awaiting moderation" flag just might be.

    20. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      According to Nick, we are not supposed to discuss it.

      1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

        Discuss what? (wink)

      2. Steve G   10 years ago

        It's the first rule of reason commenting

  33. Coeus   10 years ago

    Britain's hardest grafter

    Even reality television has its limits, and the BBC?that vaunted public trust?may have found them last week, after advertising for contestants for "Britain's Hardest Grafter." The five-part series, which is set to air on BBC2, will pit 25 underpaid young people against each other to win the equivalent of a year's living wage?roughly ?15,500?in a competition that the British press and angry viewers have already called "Hunger Games-style," "degrading and exploitative," and "poverty porn." The show has contestants performing different kinds of blue-collar work to prove they're the most productive grafter. (That's British slang for "hard worker.")

    The horror.

    1. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

      Oh, yes, UK... Show us your work ethic. Please.

      *Prediction: The Scot wins it.

    2. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      I thought graft meant theft?

      1. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

        "Working is theft. Not giving is taking. Etc."

  34. lafe.long   10 years ago

    Mike Rowe's Stellar Reply to Letter Writer Calling His Work Ethic Movement 'Right-Wing Propaganda'

    Everyday on the news, liberal pundits and politicians portray the wealthy as greedy, while conservative pundits and politicians portray the poor as lazy. Democrats have become so good at denouncing greed, Republicans now defend it. And Republicans are so good at condemning laziness, Democrats are now denying it even exists. It's a never ending dance that gets more contorted by the day.

    I really like Mike.

    1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      Sometimes I dream
      That he is me
      You've got to see that's how I dream to be
      I dream I move
      I dream I groove
      Like Mike
      If I could be like Mike

    2. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

      I do, too. I'm curious about the commenter, especially in regards to the Britain's Hardest Grafter pearl-clutching. Does he just go around bitching about people working and having it broadcast?

    3. Mike M.   10 years ago

      Wow, so even the idea of work is now a right-wing conspiracy. The left has been more brazen and retarded at the same time.

      1. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

        Hey, hey, hey... we just need to check our job-privilege. Apparently, drawing a paycheck makes us too haughty.

        I would say what their plan is to put us in our place, but I ain't giving them any ideas.

  35. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

    Preet Bahara is a very handsome man.

  36. Derpetologist   10 years ago

    OK, everyone please take a seat. Welcome to Reason Commenter Sensitivity Training, a mandatory course made possible by the US Department of Justice and sheep-fucker lawyer Arthur Volk.

    Now, what do we know about judges and prosecutors?

    That's right- they're lawyers who work for the government. And what else does that mean? Anyone? Anyone?

    Right, they're vain, brainless, thin-skinned thugs. So when you insult them, you must be very, very careful that they don't perceive it as a threat or use it as an excuse to sue you.

    The smart thing to do is to be as absurd as possible. Instead of wishing for an evil prosecutor or judge to be shot, wish for them to be crushed by a truckload of Jersey Shore talking pens. Instead of wishing for them to be thrown in a woodchipper, wish for them to be raped to death by poison dart frogs.

    The more insane your curse is, the easier it is to defend it as hyperbole.

    Thank you. Are there any questions? If not, please make sure your name is on the sign-in sheet before you leave.

    1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      Am I allowed to wish for the Reason standard death by scaphism? Or by the pear of anguish? What about the brazen bull?

      1. Derpetologist   10 years ago

        Archaic torture devices are good, although it's best to "seal the deal" with a reference to pop culture or the animal kingdom.

    2. Riven   10 years ago

      wish for them to be raped to death by poison dart frogs.

      I knew I shouldn't have told anyone what I wished for last time I blew out the candles on my birthday cake. Now it'll never come true

      /kicks rocks

      1. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

        Oh, I think that's a violation of the Birthday Wish Act of 1973. Expect a visit any day now.

    3. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

      Right, they're vain, brainless, thin-skinned thugs. So when you insult them, you must be very, very careful that they don't perceive it as a threat or use it as an excuse to sue you.

      Well, is it "acceptable" to wish natural calamity on this judge? Like contracting a particularly agonizing and untreatable form of anal cancer? Or having a stroke which leaves him in excruciating pain while totally unable to move, communicate, or do anything other than lay still and silent, trapped in his own Hell?

    4. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      I hope they drown in a pool of poutine gravy while choking on the cheese curds.

  37. BigT   10 years ago

    I want to thank whomever recommended "The Power Broker" by Robt A Caro. It reads like a blueprint for the Obama admin.

    Actually, fuck you to whomever recommended this book - every time I read another 50 pages I get so angry I might have a heart attack.

  38. Paul.   10 years ago

    Ok, this thread is now looking like vermin have been eating away at the comments.

  39. Not an Economist   10 years ago

    Just so you vent your spleen a at Reason approved target, here is extremely low hanging fruit.

    You may fire (a lot) when ready.

    1. Steve G   10 years ago

      That is not only the stupidest article (the 5 most dangerous guns in America are the categories of all guns in America: pistols, rifles, shotguns, etc... duh), but it's a retread. Saw essentially the same article a few months ago.

  40. Steve G   10 years ago

    Not for nuthin, but I sure hope the organization i donate money to puts my money where their mouth is on this freedom stuff and shows maximum spine in the near future.

  41. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    Boner cancer, so they can't f*** innocent people over.

  42. BigT   10 years ago

    Agammamon, change of plans. I'm going deep-sea fishing with LeBron James, Pope Francis, and Vladmir Putin that day. Fly out with the judge in your Cessna and parachute onto our dinghy. We'll be just west of St George's Island. We'll use the old bag for shark bait.

  43. Zeb   10 years ago

    I don't think that helps.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech

Jack Nicastro | 5.8.2025 4:57 PM

Is Shiloh Hendrix Really the End of Cancel Culture?

Robby Soave | 5.8.2025 4:10 PM

Good Riddance to Ed Martin, Trump's Failed Pick for U.S. Attorney for D.C.

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.8.2025 3:55 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Already Raising Car Prices and Hurting Automakers

Joe Lancaster | 5.8.2025 2:35 PM

Trump's Antitrust Enforcer Says 'Big Is Bad'

Jack Nicastro | 5.8.2025 2:19 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!