Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

House GOP Vows to Salvage 'Fast Track' Trade Authority, Martin O'Malley Wants Lefty Love, UK Wants Cops to Screen Everybody's Email: P.M. Links

J.D. Tuccille | 5.13.2015 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • Public Domain

    The Senate may still be hashing out the idea, but House GOP leaders say they're on track to give the president renewed "fast track" trade promotion authority. (Sen. Rand Paul is having none of it.)

  • Martin O'Malley wants Democrat lefties to give up on Elizabeth Warren and support his run for the presidency.
  • Britain's government wants police to screen people's online communications to sniff out extremism. Which is a perfectly modest proposal.
  • With a move for at least minor restraint on domestic surveillance gaining legislative steam, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) thinks we should set the NSA loose instead.
  • Congress is considering cutting Amtrak funding, which may literally prevent a(nother) trainwreck.
  • The Libertarian Party sued the Republican-Democrat lovefest known as the Commission on Presidential Debates in an effort to gain access to their chats.

Follow Reason on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Coffee Research Casts Further Doubt on Warnings About Energy Drinks

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (337)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    Martin O'Malley wants Democrat lefties to give up on Elizabeth Warren and support his run for the presidency.

    Catfight!

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Hello.

      1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

        I am writing a new kids' story called:

        The Hare Fist and the Tortoise Tor Network.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

          I assume this is pettiness. I wouldn't know for sure since I never engage in it myself.

          1. BigT   10 years ago

            Will you soon be calling yourself "2nd of Etiquette?"

      2. Ted S.   10 years ago

        I won't be spoiling any results, but then again, the CL ended after 75 minutes on May 6. 🙂

      3. Raven Nation   10 years ago

        Complimenti!

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          Heh.

          Masterful, typical, Juve.

          In the heat no less.

          1. Catatafish   10 years ago

            Thank Science I'll have someone to cheer for against Barca.

    2. Tonio   10 years ago

      Catfight in US English generally refers to a semi-serious spat between two women. Or you may be dissing O'Malley.

      1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

        I think the latter.

      2. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

        I liked Arnold Schwarzenegger trolling Democracts by calling them girlie men.

        1. Almanian!   10 years ago

          "You know, dey talk about dis and dat, but really dey are just GIRLIE MEN..."

          Ahnold is so perfect sometimes.

        2. Tonio   10 years ago

          Ah, ok. Should have known better.

    3. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      Supporting O'Malley over Warren - are leftists going to be *that* stupid?

      1. Xeones   10 years ago

        God, i hope so, if for no other reason than all the progs that will fill my facebook feed with their sweet, sweet lamentations.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Congress is considering cutting Amtrak funding...

    No, you throw money at a problem.

    1. Catatafish   10 years ago

      No, Fist. You BURN the money and then throw the ashes at the problem.

      1. expat   10 years ago

        No, no, no. You throw money at the problem, then throw more money at the first money to fund the burning.

        1. Catatafish   10 years ago

          *puts flipper to chin...nods in agreement*

        2. hamilton   10 years ago

          Really, the best way to put out a big inferno of burning money is to stifle it with a much larger pile of money.

          1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

            +1 Trillion Dollar Coin Federal Reserve Notes.

    2. Mr. Bourgeoisie   10 years ago

      I blame Barry and that damned sequester.

    3. JW   10 years ago

      Vice President Wrongway Peachfuzz will have something to say about that.

      1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

        He support moose and squirrel darlink!

  3. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    The Libertarian Party sued the Republican-Democrat lovefest known as the Commission on Presidential Debates in an effort to gain access to their chats.

    Let the philosophical fights on H&R begin!

    I think this is a good lawsuit. Liberatarian purists disagree.

    1. hamilton   10 years ago

      Wait, why? I thought we opposed closed markets.

      1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

        Duopolistic SOBs close out markets.

        Upstart new company tries to get in by getting the government to intervene.

        Libertarian 1: Don't get the government to break up the duopoly.
        Libertarian 2: How else are you going to open up the market?

        And thus begins a fight...

        1. Almanian!   10 years ago

          TEAM ALMANIAN NUKES EVERYONE FROM ORBIT, TAKES OVER.

          And THAT'S the kind of leadership you'll not get by electing me in 2016!

          Almanian for President - 2016
          I Probably Won't Make It Any Worse

          And I definitely will not nuke you from orbit. Probably.

          1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

            Almanian for President - 2016
            I Probably Won't Make It Any Worse

            Put it on a bumper sticker and you've got my vote, unless I've been nuked from orbit!

            1. Xeones   10 years ago

              Orbital nukings for some, tiny American flags for others!

          2. Dark Lord of the Cis   10 years ago

            Well, you lost my vote.

            1. Almanian!   10 years ago

              Oh, so you WANT to be nuked from orbit?

              That can be arranged...

        2. Agammamon   10 years ago

          Libertarian 1: Hello.
          Libertarian 2: Hi.

          And thus begins a fight...

    2. Tonio   10 years ago

      I think we're all in favor of increased ballot access. Just some of the folks here will still vote a straight Team Red ticket because they feel that libertarians will never win.

      1. Ted S.   10 years ago

        It's not as if TEAM RED is going to win where I live.

        1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

          What sad place do you live in? It's not like TEAM RED is any better, but still...

    3. Ted S.   10 years ago

      Who are these "libertarian purists"? M***ael H**n?

      1. Hamster of Doom   10 years ago

        Only 91% of him.

      2. Tonio   10 years ago

        Ted, you scamp.

        1. Sevo   10 years ago

          (laughing)

    4. tarran   10 years ago

      Sooo, here is the website of the foundation that is actually filing suit (and it looks like it's a Gary Johnson effort vice an LP effort).

      And frankly they should have their asses kicked for filing this unprincipled and stupid tripe:

      1) Basically, they are demanding that the Republicans and Democrats give them a seat at the table.

      2) They seem to be hoping that the judges will decide to come up with some right to be published that in practice will gut the first amendment. What's next, should Illinois Nazis be given a platform by ny the Bnai Brith folks?

      They have no case as a matter of principle. They have no case as a principle of law. It's stupid, a waste of money, and if they win will be a step backward for freedom by creating a court manufactured version of the Equal Time doctrine.

      Morons.

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

        But aside from all that, it's fine, right?

        1. tarran   10 years ago

          If one can characterize a baseless lawsuit that completely lacks any merit, as being "fine", then I guess this is a fine lawsuit.

          1. Libertymike   10 years ago

            Did you read the complaint?

            1. tarran   10 years ago

              Nope. All they have is a press release. I can't find their filing anywhere online, which implies to me that they know it's an embarrassing train wreck. Their press release doesn't articulate any libertarian principle other than "Waaaah!!!! Baby wants!!!!!!"

              1. Libertymike   10 years ago

                I tried, albeit briefly, to find it as well. No luck.

                Yes, it would appear that what they want to do is premised upon a big whine. Nevertheless, I am interested in actually reading the pleadings to see how they construct their whine.

      2. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

        If it's okay to force a Christian baker to serve a gay wedding, it should be okay to force CBS, ABC, NBC, and Fox News to seat the Libertarians and Greens at the debate. Right?

        1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

          How dare you lump me in with the likes of Christian bakers.

    5. Zeb   10 years ago

      Here's a more libertarian way to achieve a similar result: don't put parties on the ballot and stop having states run party primaries. Why should any political party have any special status beyond what any other social club or advocacy organization has?

      No, that wouldn't stop the parties from running their own debates however they want to. But it would knock them down a peg and make them pay for their own shit. Why the hell are we all paying to help political parties pick candidates?

      1. Tejicano   10 years ago

        Look, silly. If we didn't fund the primaries and enable the parties to quality of candidates they get on the ballot where would...

        Hey, wait... ?!!?

    6. Robert   10 years ago

      Who cares about the philosophic argument, what about the practical one? Namely, if the Commission were forced to include lesser candidates, what are the odds both major ones would attend?

  4. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    ...House GOP leaders say they're on track to give the president renewed "fast track" trade promotion authority.

    And then on to helping him shore up Obamacare.

    1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

      Unless I'm missing something, all "fast-track authority" means is that the administration negotiates a treaty, and then Congress gets to vote it up or down, without modifications. That eliminates Congress messing with the details, which would require re-negotiating the treaty with other countries. So what's the objection to fast-track?

      1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

        Fast track is to legislation what a quickie is to sex.

        1. Dark Lord of the Cis   10 years ago

          I get what I want without any bullshit and then light a cigarette on my way out the door?

          1. Root Boy   10 years ago

            Plus cab fare as I'm sure this deal requires some piles of cash for favored industries.

      2. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        I believe the main sticking point is the lack of transparency (to members of Congress).

        1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

          Fist, how many times do I have to remind you that this the most transparent administration in history?

          1. PBR Streetgang   10 years ago

            + ________

      3. Sevo   10 years ago

        PapayaSF|5.13.15 @ 4:39PM|#
        "Unless I'm missing something,"

        "If you want to hear the details of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal the Obama administration is hoping to pass, you've got to be a member of Congress, and you've got to go to classified briefings and leave your staff and cellphone at the door."
        http://www.politico.com/story/.....z3a3S6nGzu

        Maybe you know something I don't, but AFAIK, this could easily be O-care II with a funny name.
        Sorry, NOTHING this lying POS proposes gets my backing unless I know every detail.

        1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

          But the treaty isn't negotiated yet, correct? So even if there's secrecy now, that doesn't mean Congress is "voting to pass something secret." They were just asked for the fast-track authority, which means once the treaty is negotiated, then Congress and everyone gets to see the whole thing, and vote it up or down without amendments.

          Not that I trust Obama, I just think that a lot of people are confusing fast-track with actually passing the treaty, when they are two separate things.

          1. iCarl   10 years ago

            But the treaty isn't negotiated yet, correct?

            There are drafts.

            But yes, comparisons to "We have to pass it to know what's in it" are a bit silly. It will be public when it comes up for vote. Whether or not legislators read it before they vote (hint: they won't) is independent of the TPA process.

          2. Sevo   10 years ago

            PapayaSF|5.13.15 @ 5:53PM|#
            "[...]They were just asked for the fast-track authority, which means once the treaty is negotiated, then Congress and everyone gets to see the whole thing, and vote it up or down without amendments.[...]"

            I repeat: That is what is claimed for something that gets the secrecy treatment mentioned above, so again, regardless of the claim, it could be O-care II for all I know.
            Sorry, NO support until I can read what the thing actually says.

      4. Agammamon   10 years ago

        So what's the objection to fast-track?

        Hmm, how about - 'We can pass it and then see what's in it', which seems to be the SOP for Congress nowadays.

    2. Zeb   10 years ago

      So, I wonder what all of the people who are convinced that Republicans oppose everything Obama wants to do because they are horrible racists are saying about this fast track thing? Seems like a big hole in their theory.

  5. Bam!   10 years ago

    The Libertarian Party sued the Republican-Democrat lovefest known as the Commission on Presidential Debates in an effort to gain access to their chats.

    A more accurate title would be "Commission on Political Recitals."

    1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

      I personally like "Republican-Democrat Duopolistic Circle Jerk".

      1. Xeones   10 years ago

        "The Major Party"

  6. Catatafish   10 years ago

    Former PA congressman talks shit about other passengers willingness to help but obvs he helped everyone...and took the time to tweet pictures from inside the train.

    http://philadelphia.cbslocal.c.....-wreckage/

    1. JW   10 years ago

      It's the start of a comeback!

    2. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

      I can't wait until it comes out that he really acted like George Costanza during a fire.

    3. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      "I should really help these people out...but first, a tweet about how I'm going to help people!"

  7. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

    Congress is considering cutting Amtrak funding, which may literally prevent a(nother) trainwreck.

    The train was going 107 MPH on a curve. But if we just throw more money at the program we could invalidate the laws of physics!

    1. Bam!   10 years ago

      That's the plan behind the hyperloop.

    2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      Isn't there a hashtag along the lines of #YOUHAD1JOB!!!

      Seriously. The driver had 1 job, which was to slow down on the curves. It's not like he had to steer.

      1. JW   10 years ago

        The driver was making a phone call from the quiet car.

        1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          There was a train accident around here about 8 years ago. The driver was texting.
          Don't worry, his union protected him.

          1. Catatafish   10 years ago

            The driver lawyered up and won't answer questions apparently.

      2. BakedPenguin   10 years ago

        Yup. There is.

    3. Michael   10 years ago

      I just read some comments elsewhere that essentially demanded this. To recap, pretty much all major outlets are reporting these key facts:

      1.) The train engine was a brand spankin' new Siemens model built just last year.
      2.) The section of track where this incident occurred had just passed inspection by Amtrak one hour earlier.
      3.) The train was TRAVELLING AT 107 MILES PER HOUR.

      Nevertheless, Team Blue fuckwits will not relent in screaming for more funding.

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

        I'm not an engineer...is 107 mph bad or something?

        1. Michael   10 years ago

          Going into a curve where the speed limit is 50, I'd venture to say so.

          1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

            Those rails should be banked!

        2. Pathogen   10 years ago

          Probably....

    4. BigT   10 years ago

      That's why we need high speed rail.

      Oh, wait...

  8. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    Britain's government wants police to screen people's online communications to sniff out extremism. Which is a perfectly modest proposal.

    The surveillance noose will only tighten with every governmental failure to prevent a terrorist attack.

    1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

      Or they could just stop importing Muslims.

      1. Tonio   10 years ago

        It would seem that the current Muslim population, including non-arab converts from traditionally christian ethnic groups, are perfectly capable of turning out enough Jihadis and wannabes to make your idea impractical. To say nothing, of course, of the complete abandonment of principle.

        1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

          My solution is not a cure-all, true. But when your boat is leaking, at least stop drilling more holes in the bottom.

    2. JW   10 years ago

      The surveillance noose

      Injun suddenly finds himself on the SPLC watch list.

      1. Almanian!   10 years ago

        So, he should feel honored then, right?

    3. BakedPenguin   10 years ago

      Yeah, they're lacking cameras in the UK. They obviously need more.

      1. Xeones   10 years ago

        Hey, they need those for CASE NIGHTMARE GREEN.

      2. Almanian!   10 years ago

        "Your wife - does she like photography?

        CANDID...photography?

        I'll bet she does! I'll bet she does!

        Say no more! A nod's as good as a wink to a blind man, eh? Eh??!!"

  9. PH2050   10 years ago

    Britain's government wants police to screen people's online communications to sniff out extremism.

    Better than having to sniff what the British call food.

    1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

      What's wrong with Indian take-away?

      1. Tonio   10 years ago

        Mostly the peas.

        1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          Imagine whirled peas, Tonio.

        2. hamilton   10 years ago

          Yeah, that's really the mutter.

          1. Tonio   10 years ago

            Mmmm...Matter Paneer...mmmm...

        3. Tonio   10 years ago

          Well-played, lads. But my understanding is that most Indian-style meal served in the UK come with a side dish of bland english-style peas.

          1. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

            Defamation! Great Indian food here.

      2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        If I have to explain it to you, you're not gonna get it.

        1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          I'd like to know why everyone I know is broken.

      3. BakedPenguin   10 years ago

        "Curry".

        And yeah, it's about the best they have going. Although the sandwiches at Marks & Spencer aren't bad.

        1. Almanian!   10 years ago

          Fried haggis on a stick in Glasgow or GTFO.

          Can we count "Scotland" as "England" for food purposes? Most consider themselves "British". Just today?

          1. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

            Traditional Scottish diet was very healthy -- lots of cabbage, oats, organ meats. Destroyed by the English and their wheat flour in absolutely everything.

    2. Zeb   10 years ago

      Hey, I like British food. Or a lot of it, anyway. Scotch eggs, weird sausages, fish and chips, sausage rolls, English fried breakfasts, Stilton cheese. What's not to love?

      1. Zeb   10 years ago

        And whatever you think about the rest of it, they definitely get beer and cheese right.

      2. Catatafish   10 years ago

        *nods aggressively*

      3. Tejicano   10 years ago

        Go eat a spotted dick!

  10. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

    Martin O'Malley wants Democrat lefties to give up on Elizabeth Warren and support his run for the presidency.

    Yes, Lefties, do this thing.

    *Looks at Sudden*

    1. Los Doyers   10 years ago

      YOU LEAVE SUDDEN'S ASS ALONE.

      1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

        Green is not your color, Los Doyers.

        1. Los Doyers   10 years ago

          I just want to watch.

          1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

            Kinky.

            1. Almanian!   10 years ago

              +1 wide stance

  11. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Britain's government wants police to screen people's online communications to sniff out extremism.

    Why don't they just outlaw extremism?

  12. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    I'm obviously race baiting!

    University Diversity Officer: Minority Women Can't Be Racist

    "If you've been invited and you're a man and/or white PLEASE DON'T COME just cos I invited a bunch of people and hope you will be responsible enough to respect this is a BME [Black and Minority Ethnic] Women and non-binary event only," she said at the time. She later posted a photo of herself wiping away fake tears near a sign reading "NO White Cis Men Please."

    1. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

      "I am not a racist. I just make judgments about people based on their skin color."

    2. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

      How can you tell if a white man is cis? Couldn't he literally just say 'I am a pre-op transsexual' and how on Earth could you possibly tell? What are you going to do, question every transsexual who comes in? Wouldn't that be a microaggression?

      1. Libertymike   10 years ago

        Perhaps you could tell if the person is donning a "I Love Renee Richards" t-shirt.

      2. MJGreen   10 years ago

        Couldn't you just identify as a non-cis person? "How dare you call me a cis white man, I don't identify as cis at all!" Seems easy.

      3. BigT   10 years ago

        Why not say you are a post-op trams-sexual. Everyone will want your doctors contact info.

        1. GILMORE   10 years ago

          "trams-sexual"

          Puts a whole new spin on "A Streetcar Named Desire"

    3. Tonio   10 years ago

      non-binary?

      1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

        You know, like Hex.

    4. Tonio   10 years ago

      And she looks pretty light-skinned to me in that photo, but I realize "brown" and "of color" are more notional than descriptive terms. Also, her eyes look blue.

      1. BakedPenguin   10 years ago

        She looks pretty cute. And completely insane.

        1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

          She's a University Diversity Officer. Crazy can be fun, but never stick it in fucktarded.

        2. fish   10 years ago

          Insane is fine....just do anal!

      2. Ted S.   10 years ago

        Wouldn't be the first woman whose brown eyes looked blue

        1. Tonio   10 years ago

          And I also understand that they have contacts which change the apparent color of one's iris.

          1. Corning   10 years ago

            Furthermore i also understand that there is a laser procedure that can turn Brown eyes blue...

            It turns out all eyes are blue only dark (brown) pigments cover up the blue color. The laser procedure destroys the brown pigments leaving only the blue color remaining.

  13. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    ...Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) thinks we should set the NSA loose instead.

    Some men take their oaths more seriously than others.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    The Libertarian Party sued the Republican-Democrat lovefest known as the Commission on Presidential Debates in an effort to gain access to their chats.

    Surely the LP knows some hackers who can access those AIM logs on the sly.

  15. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    Did anyone post this already?

    Related to the Jade Helm conspiracy.

    I Challenged a PolitiFact Rating, and You Won't Believe What Happened Next

    1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

      For an example of PolitiFact's "fact-checking" skills, check out this one. Romney said that the CBO said that up to 20 million people will lose health insurance due to Obamacare. Politifact investigates, discovers that indeed that was the top CBO estimate, and while Romney did say "up to," they say "it's the most extreme outcome of the five presented, and it's not the primary estimate," so they rate it as "false"!

      In other words, you can quote a high estimate from the CBO prefaced by "up to," which is undeniably true, and still be called a liar by Politifact. Amazing.

      P.S. Naomi Wolf is a total babe. Too bad she's an insane proggy.

      1. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

        Statements by Democrats get "Mostly True" while similar (or even more accurate) statements by Republicans get "Mostly False."

        See this.

        1. Corning   10 years ago

          I rate PolitiFact to be filled with Politihacks

      2. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

        She is? I can't get past the crazy eyes.

        1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

          I'm not seeing crazy eyes....

          1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

            Really? They can't photoshop out the crazy. Those eyes say she's killed before, and she'll kill again.

  16. Los Doyers   10 years ago

    I've heard of(but never watched, of course)London cabbie porn.

    But they may be onto something here...

    1. Wasteland Wanderer   10 years ago

      The best part of London cabbie porn is when the two lovers' jagged teeth get locked together, and then they have to roust London's only dentist in order to separate them.

      1. fish   10 years ago

        I lol'ed!

  17. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Martin O'Malley wants Democrat lefties to give up on Elizabeth Warren and support his run for the presidency.

    The race to lose to Hillary is on.

    1. Los Doyers   10 years ago

      If only she'd just left the tip.

      1. Tonio   10 years ago

        Just the tip? /obligatory

        1. Los Doyers   10 years ago

          I was moving towards that, but needed someone else to complete the glans chain.

          *ponders new sex device he may have just invented*

          1. Tonio   10 years ago

            I think that already exists. There are indian models with chains, and one-piece modern western designs.

            1. Los Doyers   10 years ago

              ....pic- er, actually I'll skip the pics on this one.

    2. Tonio   10 years ago

      She will not go gently. Expect to see scorched-earth tactics worthy of Wm. T. Sherman.

      1. BigT   10 years ago

        "She will not go gently. Expect to see scorched-earth tactics worthy of Wm. T. Sherman."

        **orders ton of popcorn**

  18. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

    Small bit of good news, Michael Kenneth McAlister was pardoned:

    Va. gov. exonerates sex offender in prison 29 years in mistaken ID case

    1. Catatafish   10 years ago

      Jesus.

    2. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

      I hope Virginia is at least going to charge him for three decades of room and board. Try to recoup some of those costs, for pete's sake.

    3. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

      To be fair, I can't really fault the original conviction since they didn't find out about Derr until well after, and the police and prosecuter did the right thing as soon as they did find out about him.

      The fact it took another 13 years after that point to resolve the matter is horrifying.

    4. iCarl   10 years ago

      Va. gov. exonerates sex offender in prison 29 years in mistaken ID case

      Um, headline writer -- they didn't exonerate a "sex offender".

      the state's ban on appeals more than 21 days after conviction in cases involving DNA.

      That's bullshit.

      McAlister was a 29-year-old carpenter living with his mother when he was identified in a photo array, and later in court, by a woman who was assaulted in the laundry room of the Town & Country apartment complex in Richmond on the night of Feb. 23, 1986.

      The 22-year-old mother was able to pull up the plaid-shirted attacker's stocking mask and get a look at his lower face. McAlister was known to police from a few alcohol-related incidents of public indecency and resembled a police sketch of the attacker drawn from the victim's description. A detective investigating the attempted rape and kidnapping case asked McAlister to wear a plaid shirt, took his photograph and included it in a photo lineup shown to the woman.

      I hope that was not all it took to put him behind bars, but I wouldn't be surprised.

  19. Bam!   10 years ago

    Britain's government wants police to screen people's online communications to sniff out extremism.

    "Extremism" will henceforth be defined as "Tory political positions."

    1. Zeb   10 years ago

      Um, isn't the government Tory and about to become even more so?

  20. BakedPenguin   10 years ago

    Kim Jong Un kills more high ranking cabinet members.

    With an anti-aircraft gun, no less.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

      And yet here in the states I can't find ammo for an AR-15.

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        Still?

        1. Zeb   10 years ago

          I think he's being funny. Seems to be plenty available.

          1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

            I refuse to explain my great jokes.

            1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

              Could you at least point to them?

    2. Warty   10 years ago

      He could have gotten a few more style points if he had killed him with a weaponized hat. But still, I'm impressed.

      1. hamilton   10 years ago

        For all we know their AA guns shoot out depleted-uranium-rimmed bowlers.

      2. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

        I'm not sure I believe they have functioning anti-aircraft guns.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

          They could have rigged the country's fax machine to explode when it was his turn to use it.

        2. fish   10 years ago

          Maybe they just dropped it on him?!

      3. Catatafish   10 years ago

        My vote would've gone to weaponized hockey stick/puck.

    3. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

      The fattie plus-sized individual will get his payback, and it will be brutal.

      1. PH2050   10 years ago

        Thought he'd be slimmer considering how much he likes to purge.

    4. Bam!   10 years ago

      You know who else killed high ranking members of is organization?

      1. Xeones   10 years ago

        Louis Farrakhan?

      2. Almanian!   10 years ago

        Hitler?

        1. Xeones   10 years ago

          No, i don't think that's right.

      3. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

        Brutus?

      4. Wasteland Wanderer   10 years ago

        Stalin?

      5. Almanian!   10 years ago

        Hitler?

        1. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

          That's a bingo!

        2. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

          Would you cut that out?

      6. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

        Darth Vader, duh.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYZoxY3sawE

      7. Dark Lord of the Cis   10 years ago

        Don Corleone?

      8. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

        King Joffrey?

      9. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

        Ted Kennedy?

      10. PapayaSF   10 years ago

        Bill Clinton?

    5. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

      the execution of a figure as close to Mr Kim as Mr Hyon was surprising and could give cause for concern about the country's stability

      Is instability in North Korea really something to be worried about? I mean, how much worse could it get?

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

        NEVER ask that question. You might get an answer.

      2. Dark Lord of the Cis   10 years ago

        Starving, dirt poor people with nothing to lose and a nuclear arsenal.

      3. Spoonman.   10 years ago

        They could tire of only murdering North Koreans and murder more Southerners, too.

    6. JW   10 years ago

      The next execution will be handled by Acme Products, Inc.

    7. Xeones   10 years ago

      Close-range AA beats being eaten alive by dogs, at least.

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        I'd still want the open casket.

      2. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

        They could've fed them to the starving peasants.

  21. GILMORE   10 years ago

    Pakistan: Still Awesome Place Which Gets a Bad Rap for No Reason

    1. GILMORE   10 years ago

      Really. Americans Always Give Us Shit for No Reason Say Pakistanis

      1. Derpetologist   10 years ago

        I really hate the way they say "caricatures" instead of "cartoons". I guess murder over cartoons would sound silly and offend people.

        1. Derpetologist   10 years ago

          The exhibition of the blasphemous caricatures was unbearable for Muslims. It was shocking, sad, tragic and intolerable. We have gathered here to pay tribute and to carry out the Islamic rites for the Muslims who tried to stop it and sacrificed their lives and they will now be called 'Martyrs for the prophet's honor'.

          They're really tipping their hand when they give away what is intolerable for them.

          1. Gus   10 years ago

            Hey Pakistani baker, make me a Mohammud cake.

      2. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

        They smile in your face
        All the time they want to take your place
        The Pakistanis

        /O'Jays

    2. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

      My wife's cousin and her husband voluntarily took a job in one of Pakistan's larger cities.

      I absolutely do not get it. I sort of have to assume it's not as bad as it seems in the news.

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        Depends on what kind of security they have.

        1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

          Uh, I think they are residence life managers at some university. I don't know what labor costs are like there, but something tells me they aren't walking around with body guards.

          1. Root Boy   10 years ago

            Obama did some visits there, maybe he can give your wife's cousin some pointers on places to see.

      2. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

        It's just not as bad in the major cities. There are several major cities in Pakistan that essentially have a middle class standard of living where people are somewhat less insane.

        Most of these really bugfuck crazy stories come from rural and small town tribal regions. The Federally Administered Tribal Regions of Pakistan that are inhabited largely by Pashtuns are completely insane, which isn't surprising since everywhere they live the Pashtuns are crazy.

      3. GILMORE   10 years ago

        From what I understand from a former Pakistani co-worker*.... if you have money, you live in neighborhoods with walls around them, and the police exist solely to keep the rabble away from people like you. Two different worlds

        *She was actually really hot. She married my british buddy.

        1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          Huh. Just like my neighborhood.

  22. GILMORE   10 years ago

    Yemen: A Lot Like a Daytime Soap Opera When You Think About It

  23. GILMORE   10 years ago

    Pope: Declares End to Crusades, Accepts Truce
    "I think we'll just agree to disagree" said the Pontiff"

    1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      Fuck that, I want a small kingdom in the Holy Land.

    2. PH2050   10 years ago

      SF'd the link.

      1. GILMORE   10 years ago

        Insha'allah

        1. PH2050   10 years ago

          "The Vatican is the spiritual capital of the Catholics, and they are recognizing Palestine, that's the chief importance," said Mr. Amireh, who is also a member of the Palestine Liberation Organization's executive committee.

          The Holy Roman Empire recognizes a region that it used to rule under the same name? I haz a confuse.

          1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

            In the days of the Holy Roman Empire, there was a certain...*tension* between the Emperors and the Popes.

            So I'm confused at your confuse.

            1. PH2050   10 years ago

              Tongue in cheek comment that could've used better phrasing, I suppose.

          2. Mickey Rat   10 years ago

            The Holy Roman Empire never ruled anything in the eastern Mediterranean, it was pretty much Germany and parts of northern Italy.

            The Roman Empire, on the other hand...

        2. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

          tldr - The Vatican has already recognized Palestine as a state. In this treaty, which deals with religious freedom for the Church in Palestine, the Vatican reiterates its recognition.

          ""The treaty, Msgr. Camilleri said, "backs a resolution of the Palestinian issue and of the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians within the Two-State Solution and the resolution of the international community."

          "But the bulk of the agreement regards freedom of religion and conscience, as well as the Church's freedom of action, its staff and jurisdiction, legal status, places of worship, social and charitable activity, and use of communications media.

          "Msgr. Camilleri added that a final chapter of the agreement regards issues of a fiscal and proprietary nature.

          1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

            "As the vast majority of the Palestinian population is Muslim, Msgr. Camilleri underscored that "the fact that the agreement clearly recognizes the Church's status, as well as religious freedom and freedom of conscience, shows it may be followed by other countries, even from those with a Muslim majority, and proves that this recognition is not incompatible with the fact that the majority of the population of a country belongs to another religion.""

            http://www.catholicnewsagency......rty-45892/

            So it seems the Pope wants legal guarantees for the rights of the Church, and of Catholics, in a Muslim-ruled area. And it wants to set precedents for further treaties recognizing Catholic rights. This in the context of militant Islamists who are driving Christian communities out of the Middle East where they have lived for millennia.

            If the Israelis think the Pope can address this situation without recognizing Palestine, let them propose their own ideas for protecting the Middle East Christian communities!

            1. PH2050   10 years ago

              They already have proposed ideas and I think some of them call for killing the militant Islamists.

              1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

                Maybe the Pope could get his albino monk assassins on the case ASAP.

                1. PH2050   10 years ago

                  I ALWAYS KNEW THEY WERE REAL

  24. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

    Jessica Valenti is so mad that she has to hide her nipples from you just because you can't stop looking at her nipples when they're just hangin' out there.

    "The first time it happened to me I was 12 years old and couldn't quite figure out why so many older men were staring at me ? then I realized I had worn a thin white bra under a white t-shirt. I'll never forget the shame and embarrassment I felt at the moment.

    It makes sense, then, that so many women jump through hoops (cups?) to ensure that our breasts retain that smooth curved look via specially padded and strategically seamed bras. But like the corset before it, it's high time we lose the padded-for-modesty bra. Are nipples really so offensive that they can't make an appearance even under clothing?"

    Hear hear! This is why I purposefully wear sweat pants everywhere but make sure not to wear underwear. I'm not your fucking slave and I don't know why I should jump through hoops (cups?) to ensure that my nether region retains that smooth curved look via specially padded and strategically seamed boxers.

    1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

      I support freer nipples.

      1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

        Really, public nudity is what I look forward to most about libertopia.

        1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          ...but there are no libertarian women.

          1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

            There are some, and I assume they are all hot.

    2. tarran   10 years ago

      Sooooo. She was embarassed that other people looked at her nipples and it's other people's problem?

      She doesn't have to cover up; she can just get over her desire to control what other people are doing. Or alternately, if she doesn't want to change her attitude, she can cover up. Life is full of choices like this.

      These people are emotionally stuck at age 6.

      1. JW   10 years ago

        C'mon tarran, you know these choices have to approved by the Collective by seekrit ballot.

      2. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

        She's not going to enact the labor of controlling her own emotions when men should enact the labor of not staring at her nipples when they're right in their fucking faces.

        1. Almanian!   10 years ago

          So...we need to teach men not to rape. Nor to look at nipples.

          *puts on more coffee*

          This is gonna be a LONG night...

        2. Gus   10 years ago

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eh2PjkzW20w

    3. JW   10 years ago

      Are nipples really so offensive that they can't make an appearance even under clothing?

      HONK HONK HIGH BEAMS WOOOOOOO!!!

      1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

        "Wake up, wake up, Mary Lou. Turn on your headlights! My snake's crawling in your grass!"

        /5th-grade dirty joke

        1. Almanian!   10 years ago

          Twat you say?

          Cunt hear you.

          Got an ear inFUCKshun.

          Bare ass me again!

          /4th grade joke

      2. tarran   10 years ago

        Someone should explain to Jessica Valenti that when men stare at tits, they aren't thinking "gee, that's offensive".

        1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

          +2

    4. Xeones   10 years ago

      You might get more respect if you did that with sweatpants that DON'T have holes in them. Seriously, it looks like you sat in gum.

    5. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Know what? I think I'd do her.

    6. Catatafish   10 years ago

      Why isn't she really taking a stand and providing us with pictures?

    7. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      My wife went to her 6 week postnatal checkup last week, and the way she informed me that she had gotten the all-clear was by wearing a thin white cotton bra. I approve of the free nipple movement.

  25. bubbakobrick   10 years ago

    Start making cash right now... Get more time with your family by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $8596 a month. I've started this job and I've never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too. You can check it out here...
    http://www.work-cash.com

  26. GILMORE   10 years ago

    Wisconsin: What This Place Needs is a White Privilege Conference

    1. Libertymike   10 years ago

      Maybe fewer cops would help.

      1. Root Boy   10 years ago

        May happen in Madison now that the Black DA let the White Cop off for shooting the crazy Mixed Race guy.

        I think those progs should disband the police and go with CCWs for all.

  27. Rich   10 years ago

    Republican Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee said Wednesday that "it's beyond belief how little data is a part of the program."

    I suppose that's the least untruthful way of putting it.

  28. GILMORE   10 years ago

    Hillary: Queen of the Whores

  29. Rich   10 years ago

    Florida Men, have you NO shame?

    1. JW   10 years ago

      The pretentious self-importance of state agents never ceases to amaze me.

  30. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Appeal to Magic strikes again.

    If Amtrak had the resources to invest in new equipment?particularly newer, straighter tracks?it could be a lot more popular and successful, as well as safer. The company estimates that trips between New York and Washington, and from New York to Boston, could be reduced to about an hour and a half. And with upgrades south and west of the Northeast Corridor, there is no reason why Florida and Chicago couldn't be within a morning or afternoon's train ride from Penn Station.
    .
    Straighten the tracks? You mean, displace thousands of people and businesses, at a cost of billions of dollars? Sure, what the fuck. We've still got checks, don't we?
    All I want is a pony; I need to up my game.

    1. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

      The amount of money a train line from Chicago to New York would lose is staggering. There are like 2 profitable train lines in the United States and they're both daily passenger traffic, not train lines between Chicago and New York.

      Let's spend billions of dollars completely overhauling the train system so that Amtrak can run even larger deficits than they currently do!

    2. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

      If Amtrak had the resources to invest in new equipment?particularly newer, straighter tracks

      I'm outraged that John Cassidy would use this tragedy to push his heteronormative political agenda.

    3. JW   10 years ago

      As we slowed to a crawl somewhere in Delaware, I happened to be reading the China Daily newspaper, which I had picked up at Union Station. It included a color spread on a new superhighway that the Chinese have carved through the mountains in Sichuan province. With great stretches of roadway raised on high concrete stilts, and long tunnels disappearing into the side of hills, it looked amazing.

      I never thought of jingoism as a fetish.

      "If we could only be more like those cutthroat authoritarians!"

      1. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

        Especially awesome given that all that awesome Chinese development has been made possible by a total lack of any concern for the environment.

        The superhighway sure does look awesome on the 7 days a year when you can see it through the smog!

        1. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

          Well enjoy it while you can, because it won't last a decade before crumbling to pieces.

          Heeeeey, now I get it. It's just one ongoing stimulus project!

          1. Root Boy   10 years ago

            They definitely confuse Opex and Capex.

            When will Friedman come along to join the chorus telling us China is awesome as well.

        2. B.P.   10 years ago

          And I'm sure the highway-building operation in China has a stellar safety record, and the workers hanging off the sides of mountains are making excellent wages.

      2. MJGreen   10 years ago

        John Cassidy or Tom Friedman?

        I guess, if it was Friedman, it would have been a Chinese cabbie describing the highway, not something as mundane as looking at a newspaper.

  31. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Are nipples really so offensive that they can't make an appearance even under clothing?"

    No. Next question.

  32. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    WTF? Harriet Tubman on the Twenny?
    Where did that come from?

    1. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

      It's pretty random, but then again she is more worth of commemoration than Andrew Jackson.

      1. kbolino   10 years ago

        Considering that Jackson vehemently opposed the National Bank, I always thought his face appeared on the $20 as a "fuck you" to him from the central bankers.

    2. Restoras, OWG   10 years ago

      First I heard of it was yesterday. Totally lame. But it's all just worthless scraps of paper anyway.

      1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        How about Neil Fucking Armstrong? Yeah, not a woman. If they want a woman, then send one to Mars and let her be the first to step on another fucking world. Fuck.

        1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

          Well, they sent a letter to Armstrong asking if he'd be interested, but there was a problem with his mailbox.

          1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

            What's the opposite of getting your face on currency? Because that's what sloopy should get.

            1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

              I dunno. Having your skin removed and made into currency?

              1. Mickey Rat   10 years ago

                Can you break a sloopy?

    3. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

      Harriet Tubman sounds like a great choice.
      She played Weezy on The Jeffersons, right?

      1. Root Boy   10 years ago

        Hmm....but along those lines Instapundit said you'd be putting a gun owning Republican on the bill, so there is that.

      2. PapayaSF   10 years ago

        She was an armed Republican. Not sure if her advocates know that.

        But I say that if Jackson gets replaced, do it with an idealized Liberty. Something like this.

        1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          Louise Jefferson? Really? I always figured her as a liberal.

    4. Zeb   10 years ago

      As long as it isn't a politician.

      My preference would be to return to putting allegorical representations of liberty on money.

  33. iCarl   10 years ago

    PoC cannot be racist, a ballad in three parts

    Ahead of Modi's visit to Beijing, a Chinese state newspaper accuses Indians of 'inferiority'

    "Due to the Indian elites' blind arrogance and confidence in their democracy, and the inferiority of its ordinary people, very few Indians are able to treat Sino-Indian relations accurately, objectively and rationally," Hu wrote.

    Ariana Miyamoto, Japan's Black Miss Universe, Says She Wants To Start A Race Revolution

    "Even though she's Miss Universe Japan," one commenter wrote on Twitter, "her face is foreign no matter how you look at it."

    Side note: even though Ms. Miyamoto is quoted in the article as saying "I'm Japanese", is Miss Universe Japan, has a Japanese surname, and "calls Japan home", the author consistently refers to her not as "Japanese", "mixed race", or "half-black, half-Japanese", but as "black".

    1. iCarl   10 years ago

      How a Japanese American burst Japan's bubble on racism

      Despite Okinawa's history, Dezaki's students viewed racism as an American problem, something they'd seen on TV. Even his coworkers, "the teachers, educated people, really knew nothing about it either."

      [...]

      Right-wing extremists online, known as the "net uyoku," pounced on Dezaki's video, saying it was full of lies and Japan-bashing.

    2. PH2050   10 years ago

      Ms. Miyamoto is freaking beautiful. Racists are so stupid.

      1. fish   10 years ago

        Indeed!

    3. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      Buried the lede:

      "The beauty queen hit the pageant circuit after a mixed-race friend of hers committed suicide. She also says that she has endured some abuse since being named Japan's first black Miss Universe....

      "I'm stubborn," Miyamoto told the AFP. "I was prepared for the criticism. I'd be lying to say it didn't hurt at all. I'm Japanese ? I stand up and bow when I answer the phone. But that criticism did give me an extra motivation.""

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

        I see a book deal...heck, a movie deal.

    4. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

      Didn't Lucy Liu already show us the proper procedure for dealing with people who bring up your non-Japanese heritage as a negative?

  34. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    "If we could only be more like those cutthroat authoritarians!"

    Well, it's a lot easier to lay the tracks nice and straight if you can just disappear everybody whose house is in the way. And those bridges go up in no time without the fuss and bother of environmental impact paperwork.

    1. GILMORE   10 years ago

      Tom Friedman actually said that

      "China is doing moon shots. Yes, that's plural. When I say "moon shots" I mean big, multibillion-dollar, 25-year-horizon, game-changing investments. ....another is building a web of high-speed trains connecting major cities...."

      Of course, that program of high-speed trains? Was a massive fucking disaster

      "For the past eight years, Liu Zhijun was one of the most influential people in China. As minister of railways, Liu ran China's $300?billion high-speed rail project. ....

      Today, Liu Zhijun is ruined, and his high-speed rail project is in trouble. On Feb. 25, he was fired for "severe violations of discipline" ? code for embezzling tens of millions of dollars. Seems his ministry has run up $271?billion in debt ? roughly five times the level that bankrupted General Motors. But ticket sales can't cover debt service that will total $27.7?billion in 2011 alone. Safety concerns also are cropping up.

      Faced with a financial and public relations disaster, China put the brakes on Liu's program. On April 13, the government cut bullet-train speeds 30 mph to improve safety, energy efficiency and affordability. The Railway Ministry's tangled finances are being audited. Construction plans, too, are being reviewed. "

      1. Root Boy   10 years ago

        Also don't forget the debt bomb over the Chinese economy and local governments. I guess PBOC can keep it going for as long as the Fed can keep their tricks going.

  35. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    We're obsessed with tech startups

    But the White House has made it clear that its focus is actually much narrower. When it comes to celebrating entrepreneurship, our society, led by Washington and Wall Street, has become fixated on the technology industry, funneling money and support primarily into tech start-ups. That myopic focus is misguided. In contrast, most aspiring entrepreneurs dream about starting Main Street companies ? restaurants, barbershops, boutiques and other everyday retail and services.

    ------

    If we continue to undervalue the potential of young entrepreneurship, the consequences will trickle throughout our economy. Inaction promises a less robust and less diversified economic recovery, and one in which fewer Americans pursue their entrepreneurial dreams. Such inaction is akin to inadequate planning for retirement. At this point in our tenuous recovery, now is exactly the best time to invest in a diversified and inclusive portfolio of entrepreneurs.

    Mostly sensible stuff, but not Word One about onerous regulation, or government at every level making it harder to start and run a business every day.

    1. PH2050   10 years ago

      Good point about the regs. I get depressed reading this stuff as it makes me think the coming medical industry revolutions will happen in other countries first instead of here in the US.

      If I didn't have the help of the University system here I would never consider starting a lab or anything else related to medical care.

      1. Root Boy   10 years ago

        Have you noticed any impact of the medical device tax on university programs? I'd assume that may impact private research funding, but probably more where manufacturing occurs.

        1. PH2050   10 years ago

          It's funny that you ask that. I was involved in a biomechanical engineering program that focused on the interaction between various experimental implant materials and the human body. The state I live in actually offers huge tax breaks to biotech and implant/prosthetic companies and there is decent support in Congress for repealing the tax completely so not all hope is lost, I suppose.

          Other than that I haven't really noticed much but then again I attend a state school so I can't comment much on private research. I'm not sure if my experience with public/private partnerships qualifies. Maybe if I get accepted into one of these internships I can provide more information.

          1. Root Boy   10 years ago

            Good luck. Most of my stipend when I was in grad school (ME) was paid by private dollars and this was state school.

            Hopefully the stupid tax will be repealed, but once the Congress gets their hand on the money it's hard to let go - Red and Blue.

  36. BigT   10 years ago

    It's not a suicide pact, just a nudge.

    http://www.vhemt.org

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      I'm ashamed to share a species with these people.

    2. Hyperion   10 years ago

      WTF are they waiting for? If they care so much, they should all just kill themselves now.

      1. Raven Nation   10 years ago

        Sigh, if you took the time to read the FAQs...

        Q: Why don't you just kill yourself?

        This could be the most frequently asked question of all. Fair enough question: if we're so bad for whatever habitat we're occupying, why don't we just stop it? There are several reasons why retroactive birth control isn't a part of VHEMT.

        As explained above, increasing death is like trying to bail out a sinking boat without plugging the leak. People are flooding in twice as fast as they're bailing out.

        It's hard enough just to get people to consider not breeding. Advocating suicide, by any method besides old age, would be a particularly hard sell. There's no way we could convince enough people to kill themselves to make a difference, especially after we're too dead to talk. Suicide doesn't set an example others will follow.

        Death comes soon enough -- far too soon for many of us. After working most of our lives, a dozen years of retirement isn't too much to ask. Those years may be dedicated to humanitarian and environmental causes.

        Shortening an existing person's life by a few decades doesn't avoid as many years of human impact as not creating a whole new life -- one with the potential for producing more of us.

        We have a responsibility to help the world as much as we're able before we die. Leaving the work for others would be irresponsible.

        VHEMT is a cause to live for not to die for.

        1. Raven Nation   10 years ago

          OK, spaced on the codes, the whole thing from the "Q" down is from the website.

          TBH, I'm not sure I have a huge problem with them as long as they remain voluntary.

        2. Hyperion   10 years ago

          Sigh, if you took the time to read the FAQs...

          Fuck the FAQ. They need to kill themselves now.

          1. Raven Nation   10 years ago

            But, but, but...

            We have a responsibility to help the world as much as we're able before we die. Leaving the work for others would be irresponsible.

            1. Root Boy   10 years ago

              Kind of like Al Gore flying private jets to solve Global Warming?

            2. Hyperion   10 years ago

              If they really want to help the world... yeah, kill themselves now.

        3. GILMORE   10 years ago

          "There's no way we could convince enough people to kill themselves to make a difference, especially after we're too dead to talk."

          lol

          their only objection is "well, its a great idea.... its just not practical"

  37. GILMORE   10 years ago

    Gamergaters = 'misogynist nutjob psychopaths'.... who wish Labour had won in the UK

  38. adolphowisner   10 years ago

    I started with my online business I earn $58 every 15 minutes. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don't check it out.
    For information check this site. ????????? http://www.jobsfish.com

  39. raquelchoi   10 years ago

    I make up to $90 an hour working from my home. My story is that I quit working at Walmart to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $40h to $86h? Someone was good to me by sharing this link with me, so now i am hoping i could help someone else out there by sharing this link... Try it, you won't regret it!......
    http://www.work-cash.com

  40. JW   10 years ago

    BEWBS. Sex sells. Sex really sells to nerd boyz. Film at 11.

    Fuck those shrews. They were never going to buy your product anyway.

  41. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

    They really are kind of absurd.

  42. Wasteland Wanderer   10 years ago

    I still don't understand how they got Kate Upton for what is essentially a shitty Civilization ripoff...

  43. Catatafish   10 years ago

    Excellent example. I was going with this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wg07Jess5uU

  44. JW   10 years ago

    Still a shrew.

  45. Almanian!   10 years ago

    faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaag!

    /Cartman

  46. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    Your Y chromosomes if you please, Mr. Brown.

  47. Rich   10 years ago

    But less absurd than GEICO commercials.

  48. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

    UGG! That's even worse than the H&R obsession with ESB.

  49. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

    That's a low bar.

    And I meant her boobs. A healthy C-cup is plenty for me. And it doesn't help that everything she wears is at least two size too small for them.

  50. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

    There's something broken inside you if you aren't impressed by Kate Upton's breasts.

  51. iCarl   10 years ago

    Yeah Irish. It's H&R's obsession.

  52. MJGreen   10 years ago

    I would never sex a woman who wears Uggs.

  53. iCarl   10 years ago

    Sex really sells to nerd boyz filthy casuals.

  54. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

    I meant the obsession with her looks. Not my obsession with her mind.

  55. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

    just big buckets of adipose tissue

  56. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

    Don't get me wrong, I'd motorboat her if given the chance, but no one *needs* breasts that big.

  57. iCarl   10 years ago

    I'm not a fan.

  58. iCarl   10 years ago

    I know. And? We all know you're in love with her. Have you asked /r/ for X-rays yet?

  59. PH2050   10 years ago

    Just think about that dead tooth, you feeling it wiggle slightly as she performs fellatio. I'll be in my bunk.

  60. JW   10 years ago

    Maybe you don't, but *I* do.

    I'm actually an equal opportunity motor boater, so don't let that keep you away, A cup ladies.

  61. fish   10 years ago

    Don't get me wrong, I'd motorboat her if given the chance, but no one *needs* breasts that big.

    BS.....that helps with my "that thing that goes up"!

  62. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    I'm with JW on the first part. I'm so lucky that my otherwise wonderful wife is also blessed in the tracts of land department. Thank you, Colombia.

  63. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

    You mean she's not a huge gamer and that's her favorite?

  64. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

    Shut the fuck up, American. How have you not been banned again yet?

  65. PH2050   10 years ago

    Sevo said it's Tulpa trolling but I'm not sure, it sounds very much like American.

  66. fish   10 years ago

    You act surprised at the reaction of the Japanese. Why?

  67. Root Boy   10 years ago

    Did someone say Sofia Vergara????

    No, she's from Venezuela.

  68. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    I'm in, but what of Double Trouble?

  69. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    Ah, but you err. She is Colombian. If you have the means, I highly recommend one.

  70. kbolino   10 years ago

    Whoever it is, it's not American. There's been more than one occasion when I too have thought "sounds like Tulpa" but, if so, he is far more pathetic than I thought.

  71. widget   10 years ago

    International Jew posts at Steve Sailer's blog also. He is not Tulpa. IJ probably thinks that there are separate countries for a reason (I agree, if so). The 'International' in his handle is meant to be ironic, obviously. The 'Jew' part might just be for irritation, I don't know. You'd have to read unz.com to grok the plausibly of that.

    He's saying that the Japanese like to be the Japanese, this is considered "racist", and what's so wrong with that?

  72. Root Boy   10 years ago

    Too late, married a New Yorker, but a guy can day dream.

  73. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    Wait, "no one needs?" What is this, a call for the redistribution of cup size? Fuck that.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Review: Was Charles Manson Carrying Out a CIA Experiment?

Brian Doherty | From the June 2025 issue

Brickbat: Parking Violation

Charles Oliver | 5.23.2025 4:00 AM

Is Donald Trump To Blame for a COVID Lab Leak?

Christian Britschgi | 5.22.2025 5:00 PM

A Top Antitrust Enforcer Is Open To Prosecuting People Who Disagree With Him

Jack Nicastro | 5.22.2025 4:45 PM

Republicans Just Killed California's E.V. Mandate. Will They Regret It?

Jeff Luse | 5.22.2025 4:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!