Google Tax Backlash
Spanish search fight
Last October, Spain's parliament passed a law, pushed by the country's big publishers, that revised copyright regulations to require payments for quoting even snippets of writing from media sources online. The law further gives news publishers an "inalienable right" to these payments that cannot be surrendered, even by the publishers themselves.
Some observers called it the "Google tax," as it was obviously designed to try to wring money out of online services that link to media outlets and include short excerpts of text, much like the service Google News provides. Thus, not allowing publishers to refuse the money made a certain sort of sense. If nobody is allowed exemptions, Google can't include in its news aggregation only those publishers who let them excerpt their stories for free. Google and other search services would have to pay everybody, so the publishers pushing this payment scheme couldn't be punished through market choices.
Alternatively, Google could decide not to aggregate any Spanish news at all, defeating the purpose of the tax. That is exactly what it did. In December, the tech giant announced it would be shutting down its news aggregation service in Spain entirely. No publishers would be getting money from Google, nor would their sites be getting the page view boosts that come from Google's links. Now the same groups that attempted to require payments from Google are trying to get the Spanish government to somehow prevent the company from closing up shop.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Google Tax Backlash."
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?