Former Military Dictator Muhammadu Buhari Wins Presidential Election in Nigeria
Led a coup in 1983, was overthrown in one in 1985, has been running for president since 2003.


Muhammadu Buhari, who ruled Nigeria for two years after taking over in a military coup in 1983, has won Nigeria's presidential election in a landslide, defeating the incumbent Goodluck Jonathan, who has presided over his country as the Islamist group Boko Haram takes control of chunks of the north.
The 2015 campaign was Buhari's fourth consecutive foray into presidential politics. He's been running for president since 2003, often running against incumbents on a platform of anti-corruption (a favorite theme of challengers not yet in power). Buhari's political ideology while he ruled Nigeria has been termed "Buharism" and described by some political commentators as a brand of anti-global capitalist nationalism or even fascism.
In the year and a half he ruled Nigeria, Buhari undertook an economic campaign to cut spending to match resources, root out corruption, lower dependence on public sector employment, and increase tariffs on imports. Unsurprising for a military government, Buhari's regime was also responsible for rampant human rights abuses. The Buhari regime exploited a law permitting long-term detention for people considered "security threats" and formed the National Security Organization, a secret police service. He used the powers of an authoritarian state to jail allegedly corrupt government officials without trial. Buhari was overthrown in another coup in 1985.
The first democratic elections for president since 1983 were held in 1993, but the results were annulled by another military coup. Presidential elections resumed on a four year schedule in 1999. The 2015 election represents the first time since then the People's Democratic Party has lost.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sorry to be a nitpicker, but I don't think the incumbent's name is Gooluck.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodluck_Jonathan
I predict he'll be so popular that he'll win his next election with 103% of the vote.
He cut spending to match revenue so.....better?
I know... this article has me so conflicted...
When has cutting spending ever made a politician more popular?
Hence he was overthrown, yes?
OT: that didn't take long...
The problem isn't that he's offensive, but that he's just not that funny.
to be fair, Stewart hasn't been funny either in over 10 years.
6 and a half years, but who's counting?
I've never seen his standup so I have no opinion of him as a comedian. I just think it's funny that yesterday the proggies were basically begging for some conservative to do something racist in regards to him and today he's pure evil.
Having lived in South Africa, I think it's probably because anyone with any sense there ends up being a bit to the right- as they see what leftist governments have done.
The jokes are so lame that I can't see how they could legitimately offend anyone.
I'm offended by how lame they are.
I'd also like to state that they are also factually inaccurate. In Thailand, you can get a Big Mac Value meal for 165 baht (around 5 bucks); whereas, even the ugliest slag at Nana Plaza is going to set you back around 1200 baht (around 36 bucks).
Jus' sayin'.
Does that include the barpenalty? Asking for a friend.
No. A "lady drink" will set you back 350 baht, if memory serves.
*checks wallet* Still got 1000 baht so I'm, er, he's good.
And enough left over for the Value Meal!
Don't forget the 400 baht from the airport.
The Buhari regime exploited a law permitting long-term detention for people considered "security threats" and formed the National Security Organization, a secret police service.
Oh, they had a NDAA too? What a coincidence!
No no! They had an NSO, not an NSA. Quite different, old chap.
You either coup to reform the country's morals, in which case your effectiveness and popularity are opposites, or you coup to be rich and powerful, in which case your help wants the same thing, so you have to rely on incompetent help and avoid on-the-job training.
He's been running for president in 2003, often running against incumbents on a platform of anti-corruption (a favorite theme of challengers not yet in power).
Power corrupts! Who would have thought.
Stay classy Africa
I see zero ways in which this will all go horribly, stupendously wrong.
He used the powers of an authoritarian state to jail allegedly corrupt government without trial.
Look, I know nobody actually reads the articles here, but come on, have a little pride in your work.
I am just here for the alt-text and comments.
I'm going to guess that Boko Haram basically running rampant as a corrupt Nigerian government fails to stop them, even with help from Chad's military, probably has something to do with the Nigerian's decision to elect a former military strongman.
What are a few human rights abuses from a jackbooted thug so long as he gets rid of the people who are burning villages down and raping children?
Nothing quite like an external threat to freedom to pave the way for an internal threat to freedom.
Works every time.
Nigeria is essentially split clean down the middle between the Muslim north and the Christian/indigenous south. It's essentially meaningless to talk about "corruption" as a reason for candidates to fail in African elections -- every African country is corrupt to its core and lacks a tradition of impartial governance; elections are about which tribe or ethnic group(s) get to rule the roost. The Brits liked the northern Sultanates, which became the military power; essentially every "military coup" in Nigeria is one that favors the Islamic north.
Whatever else is happening, Muhammadu Buhari did not win because of a vague sense of anti-corruption. It wasn't because they think he'll stop Boko Haram, given that he is a Muslim and more or less won on Islamist support. He's winning because Boko Haram is in every sense succeeding at its mission, and the south is demoralized and disunited.
Who's the new oil minister? I'm expecting an email shortly.
Nu-uh! I am going to help him get his money out first.
*whistles "We're in the Money"*
Wait, what?
Perhaps this is the moment the tides of Boko Haram will begin to recede and the planet will heal? Did he have fake Greek pillars and a seal that says "Office of the President Elect"?
Given the president-elect's name and now in light of his connections to the Obama Administration, I'd say it's a safer bet that his election will pave the way for Boko Haram to become the government of Nigeria.
But Mrs. Lightworker made a concerned face and held up a hashtag! Does this mean we won't be getting our girls back?
Ummm, I hope you haven't just lit the Shriek signal...
Hopefully, he'll make restitution payments to that Nigerian Prince that I've been sending money to so I can get paid back.
As a noted polemicist once put it, this specimen is sufficient for knowledgeable men:
"He was running on an anti-corruption platform and pledged to remove immunity protections from government officials. He also gave support to enforcement of Sharia law in Nigeria's northern states, which had previously caused him political difficulties among Christian voters in the country's south.[23]
The elections were marred by widespread sectarian violence, which claimed the lives of 800 people across the country, as Buhari's supporters attacked Christian settlements in the country's center regions.[57] The three day uprising was blamed in part on Buhari's inflammatory comments.[57] In spite of assurances from Human Rights Watch, who had judged the elections as "among the fairest in Nigeria's history", Buhari claimed that the poll was flawed and warned[57] that "If what happened in 2011 should again happen in 2015, by the grace of God, the dog and the baboon would all be soaked in blood"
Had a friend that oversaw construction of oil extraction and refineries in Nigeria a few years back. His assesment of the place: "It's not for the squeemish."