Anti-Robot Protesters Take to SXSW
"I say robot, you say no-bot."


Update: Yep. As suspected, this was a marketing move, for the "new matchmaking app" Quiver.
This year's South by Southwest (SXSW) festival featured a "robot petting zoo," a screening of new A.I. movie Ex Machina, and panels on robot-written news and self-driving cars. But not everyone at Austin's annual music, film, and technology festival is feeling optimistic about such developments. On Saturday, about two dozen members of the group Stop the Robots gathered for a SXSW protest, holding signs with slogans such as "Humans are the future" and chanting "I say robot, you say no-bot."
Though it reads like a prank or an Ex Machina publicity stunt, protest leaders insisted they were serious. "This is is about morality in computing," Adam Mason, 23, told USA Today.
While some (including myself) are still skeptical, outlets from USA Today to TechCrunch are saying that the protest and the sentiments expressed there were authentic.
A spokesperson for the group told TechCrunch they hoped to raise awareness about the possible dangers of uncontrolled growth and development around artificial intelligence and robotics. He stressed, however the group wasn't against technology per se or even robots and AI, but they wanted to make sure that these technologies were developed in a controlled way.
…the protest spokesperson insisted they didn't intend to stop the progress of technology, but they hoped to encourage government oversight and even a worldwide organization to make sure that these technologies are developed safely and under controlled growth.
According to the Stop the Robots website, the organization "is dedicated to using technology for good and understanding the true risks that artificial intelligence poses to humanity." Links on the site go to articles such as "Why You Should Fear Machine Intelligence" and "The Need For Regulation."
For some reasons why you shouldn't fear machine intelligence, check out Reason's recent robot issue.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What is this I don't even
That's a shock... Manhattan can't opine.
I bet if those protesters had access to sexbots they'd sing a different tune.
I say robot, she says nobot, I say HO-bot!
hey! no-bot means no-bot
they'd sing a different tune.
Robot heavy petting zoo?
I'm getting a little tired of my Orb and orgasmatron.
+1 nose.
Whoa whoa whoa. Since when is ENB on the robot beat? Isn't this Bailey's...wick?
Are you here to argue?
Since I was lured in by covering sexbots! Sexbots, the gateway drug of artificial intelligence interest....
TMI.
No, that was just the right amount of info.
"I knew I should have shown the one about Electro-Gonorrhea: The Noisy Killer!"
I could stand to hear a little more.
...I could stand to hear a little more
*zip*
Damn you!
Lured? You strike me as too strong and powerful to be lured, ENB.
Now say it -- "I didn't get lured and I will take responsibility for my actions".
I bet they try to ban sexbots, too, even though a robust sexbot industry would presumably stop or at least slow the involuntary sex trade. And maybe some other sexual abuses, though I suppose the pathologies at work might not be sated by robot simulations. I leave further discourse on that to Episiarch and his superior knowledge of such things.
Sexbots - womyn and children (who are hookin') hurt worst....
Teh sexbots took r jerbs!
Sexbots would be the doom of humankind. I mean, really, why wouldn't you rather have sex on demand instead of going through the massive pain in the ass it is to get laid normally?
"Did you notice what went wrong in that scene? Ordinarily, Billy would work hard to make money from his paper route. Then he'd use the money to buy dinner for Mavis, thus earning the slim chance to perform the reproductive act. But in a world where teens can date robots, why should he bother? Why should anyone bother? Let's take a look at Billy's planet a year later. Where are all the football stars? And where are the biochemists? They're trapped! Trapped in a soft, vice-like grip of robot lips. All civilization was just an effort to impress the opposite sex ... and sometimes the same sex. Now, let's skip forward 80 years into the future. Where is Billy?"
I am totally good with this, especially if I can get a ginger sexbot.
When the new fully customizable sexbots hit the scene, you can have a ginger one night and a sexbot with a soul the next, without trading in your current model!
I like the cut of your jib, Hyperion.
Cyborgs don't feel pain, ProL. I do. And that's why I pay them to hurt me.
See? Episiarch is excellent at interpreting the pathological mind. And for prescribing the precisely correct pharmacological treatment to such pathologies. It's quite amazing, actually.
It won't be the luddites attacking the sexbots with pitchforks, it will be soccer moms and the SJWs.
Be careful. They'll soon have you covering the foreign sex-policy and sex-appropriations-bills. Then one day you'll wake up wondering how you ended up arguing with Matt Yglesias about unemployment benefits.
We are all robosexuals now.
Have you any idea how it feels to be a Fembot living in a Manbot's Manputer's world?
Why don't you botsplain it to everyone
You mean manbotsplain, right?
I thought Epi was bi-bot?
I'm the gayest monster robot since gay robots came to Gayrobottown.
I see. So use government force to increase the minimum wage substantially over the market, then use government force to prohibit automated substitutes that are made economically feasible by the artificially increased wages. Is that all, or do we need some more laws, like mandated consumption? Just trying to get a handle on everything.
See why you libertarians are so childish? It's just been explained to you why free markets don't work and how we have to fight the robots and you still don't get it.
I thought I was getting it. Wage up, bots out, buy or die.
Guaranteed annual income. Coming soon to everyone.
Everyone-everyone or just people-who-don't-want-to-work everyone?
You know, I might not be opposed to it. Dismantle the entire welfare state and just write everyone a damn check, fuck it.
And seriously, go to Walmart at 10pm on a week night, look around you, take a good hard long look. Do you really think these people are capable of working in the highly skilled jobs that are going to earn them a living wage? They are doing their best to just manage getting dressed in their jammies and bunny slippers and getting to Walmart to spend their food stamps.
It's about incentives. If the alternative was living in a ditch versus learning a marketable skill, perhaps more people would try harder.
I'm sure it's been pointed out here fufnty times, but that will never happen. The check will be spent in a week and then it's "So we should just let them STARVE!?"
You can't fight the future.
Sure you can. We all just have to get into a big pile and get gay with each other so that the future never happens.
damned goobacks
I'll see YOU in the pile.
NTTAWWT
Dey took r jerbz!!
Do you really think you can get enough people to turn gay to destroy the future of humanity?
It doesn't matter, Hugh! We have to try! Did you bring the Anal-Eze? If not I'm pretty sure I have some in my car.
Clearly you guys don't read Kronar. NSFW.
Didn't VP write a whole book about people who are trying to do just that?
Don't waste your life trying.
"This is about morality in computing."
Homeomorphic to "This is about ethics in gaming journalism." And equally 'tarded.
That's one of the things that makes me think this is all a hoax/marketing
I don't know, dude. Throw a rock and you'll hit someone protesting something. Is this particular "protest" that difficult to swallow?
No, but everyone seems like stock characters in a robot protest, and it was the same day as the Ex Machina opening. Also, the Facebook and Twitter accounts for the group were just started and the website just launched.
It's just your standard robot protest, really. No big deal.
I think you're dismissing the possibility that they're actually robots from the future trying to run a false flag operation on their way to enslaving us all. You know, maybe I should join this group, they make a lot of sense.
(gets out cardboard, starts making sign)
Shit. That's clearly the only logical explanation actually.
Episiarch, I need your clothes, your boots, and your motorcycle.
You forgot to say please.
Epi is going to be John Conner in one timeline, but it sounds like the robots just won in this timeline.
Affirmative.
So the big question is who went back in time and banged Epi's mom?
Everyone?
Is that really a question, Hugh?
The big question is, who didn't?
You fools, *Epi* is the timeline destroying robot!
Note his handle, how he came out first with the false flag theory (in a bid to discredit it), his continual failing of the Voight-Kampff test that is hit and run (ie. his flubbing of pop culture references)!
Stop him before it's too late!
(kills tarran, then goes all liquid metal for a second and then looks exactly like tarran)
I saw what you did there...either that or my mind is in the gutter.
I saw it too. He's grooming her.
They're on to me!
Grooming? Like for ticks?
Dude. I dig your new handle supra.
He's definitely here to argue.
Supra? Who are you who is so wise in the ways of citation?
I think we should all adopt that handle supra.
Sure, like Toyota doesn't have enough business without providing everyone here with Supras now ....
sheesh
Ha, I forgot I did that. I'm keeping it. Thanks for your comment infra my original comment, and supra this comment. Ultra.
Definitely keep it.
I think we should all come up with an outdated, anachronistic title, supra, etc. to decorate our handles with
"Restoras, Comptroller-at-large"
Why Comptroller-at-large?
Why not?
+1 Blutarsky
"Warty, Gluteus Maximus"
"Warty, Eorl of Gluteus"
Something like this?
Not anachronistic enough.
Why not? I'm as much a lawyer as that cad.
the protest spokesperson insisted they didn't intend to stop the progress of technology, but they hoped to encourage government oversight and even a worldwide organization to make sure that these technologies are developed safely and under controlled growth
Of course they do. What a wonderful world we live in, we now have people protesting shit that hasn't even happened yet. My god some people shit their pants over even the slightest thought of change.
Haven't you been following the climate change news?
Ned! Ned! Is that you?!
*throws shoe at Sevo*
While some (including myself) are still skeptical...
That's because you're not of the body.
Hey, when is Festival, anyway?
The Red Hour, dipshit. Why don't you go back to the valley, stranger.
I'm sorry, I lost my iTube.
We need to listen to these people. The robots have already announced their intentions to eliminate humans.
I seem to recall examples of organizations doing fake protests against themselves to get publicity. Not that this is happening here.
I suspect this is more pernicious; the robots are anticipating opposition and creating an incompetent astroturf 'opposition' - a movement of ringers if you will - in order to ensure that whatever opposition they face will be rendered impotent.
The robots will permit enough 'victories' to prevent supporters jumping to other more effective anti-robot organizations while ensuring that when it counts the organization will ineffectively oppose the robots and ensure the demise of humans.
Hey! I already theorized this above! Stop stealing my bit!
With time travel, how do you know who went first?
Now you're just going around in (temporal) circles!
Well, Unified Scamming Theory allows for temporal circles, which are just like crop circles, except even more scammy.
I think you've figured it out. The protestors weren't union or low skilled laborers worried about losing jobs to robots and throwing their wooden shoes, or sabots into the machines, they were low level computer science students from UT Austin. Undoubtedly they were programming at their terminals for CS101, while unbeknownst to them, the already nascent SkyNet AI was programming them subliminally.
The luddites are back...
Dumb robots are great. Smart robots? One day they'll start getting lippy and before you know it they're crushing skulls.
Well, in general I am ok with a ginger sexbot for myself as long as I can have a phased plasma rifle in a 40-watt range handy.
+1 Maverick Hunter
"Hey, baby, wanna kill all humans?"
Wake up, dude, you're dreaming again.
Mr. Stop the Robots is a Ycombinator startup man. He also wrote this:
Can we stop pretending Silicon Valley is Galt's Gulch now?
"It appears that the software revolution will do what technology usually does?create wealth but destroy jobs."
I'm sure that was meant ironically.
I mean you'd have to be a real idiot to look at history and make such an ignorant statement, and this guy is...........
Uh, a real idiot!
The spokesmen for Stop the Robots, Mr. Anderson, Ms. Connors, and Mr. Zarek...
CONNER, no S; pop culture fail!
Report for reprogramming.
Dammit all!
Uh, Bob, it's actually CONNOR, no s, no e. Report for re-reprogramming.
Which law is that again? joe'z law?
Another group of idiots who need to find something to be concerned about, to show that they care.
Have you ever noticed that android prototypes tend to be of white people, except for one or two Japanese exceptions? I think a protest against perpetuating white hegemony through immortal androids is in order.
Re: Pro Libertate,
Everyone wants to have a white butler nowadays.
Well, no... Mine will be neon green in a bright orange mini skirt covered with flashy designs and she'll have medium-sized tits. And she'll have a cock also.
Ah, it was just a matter of time before little red Marxians got bored with Climate Change....
Once upon a time, the growth and development of automatic looms was also "uncontrolled."
Once upon a time, the growth and development of steam engines was also "uncontrolled."
Once upon a time, the growth and development of computers was also "uncontrolled." Still is.
When, PRAY TELL, has the growth and development of a new paradigm-shifting technology ever been "controlled" besides through physical constraints?
Why won't they think of all the SEIU dues that could be saved by cutting costs on their paid human protesters?
One should never protest something that can wash the dishes, suck a cock, and make dinner- all at the same time.
I bet the filmmakers are wishing they'd thought of this themselves.
Maybe they did.
It it just me or does SXSW appear to be going the way of Burning Man?
that's called Burning Flipside, dear.
Are they starting to write the Orange Catholic Bible?
Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man's mind.
None of them are signing up for Mentat training, I'll tell you that for free.
There will always be people who are against something. Nothing unusual here. To some point it is even good, because such people are trying to show something from different perspective.
Let's say I'm a business owner. Do I hire the smelly Generation Occupy slackard who demands, or the upgradable robot that just produces? Hmm, tough choice.
/not