Export-Import Bank

Export-Import Bank Data Returns, With Important Info Still Missing

Who needs information about who is getting the loans, what they're spending it on, and who is repaying them?

|

Do tell us all about income inequality while bankrolling loans for jets.
Credit: aisletwentytwo / photo on flickr

A couple of weeks ago we noted that all data about the crony capitalism-facilitating Export-Import Bank of America had mysteriously disappeared off data.gov. Reason contributor and Mercatus Institute Senior Research Fellow Veronique de Rugy raised the alarm. Given the movement to eliminate the bank by those who realize its role in using taxpayer dollars for the benefit of massive corporations like Boeing and General Electric, it wasn't much of a conspiracy theory to suggest the bank didn't want data that could serve to counter its self-promotion to be easily accessible. (Not helping: The bank's communication office did not—and still has not—responded to an e-mail and a phone call for Reason looking for information.)

Fortunately, de Rugy and some associates had downloaded the data that had gone missing and posted it back online. And then after The Hill picked up the mystery, some data from the Ex-Im Bank has returned online. The problem, de Rugy has discovered, is that the data they've restored online is missing information it used to have, like applications that had been denied and some critical information about those who do get deals, information that would be very useful for tracking what the bank is actually doing. De Rugy explains over at National Review:

I picked three Ex-Im transactions and compared the information I found for each deal in each dataset. Here is what I found: The three transactions I chose are:

Transaction ID # 07086750XX0001 in FY 2014, a $281 million loan to Roy Hill in Australia (which happens to be owned by that country's richest woman) to purchase Caterpillar equipment (a gigantic company which happens to be one of Ex-Im's favorite customers)

Transaction ID # 08087436XA0001 in FY 2013, a $148.5 million loan guarantee to the state-owned Emirates Airline to purchase Boeing jets

Transaction ID # 07085466XX0001 in FY 2012, a $3.5 billion loan (the largest ever reported in Ex-Im records) Saudi Arabian company Sadahara Chemical Company purchase boilers from "Various US Companies." (Real transparent.)

In the new dataset, for the Australia deal, you can't see the supplier (International Trade & Transporation Inc), the buyer (Roy Hill Holdings Pty Ltd. – that's Australis's richest woman's company), or the source of repayment (also Roy Hill Holdings Pty Ltd). The borrower for this transaction happens to be Roy Hill Holdings Pty Ltd., but there's no way you could know that just by looking at the new dataset.

For the Boeing/Emirates deal, you can't see the supplier ("Various US Small Businesses" – real helpful) or the buyer (Spv/Emirates Airline) or repayer (Spv/Emirates Airline). Again, the borrower in this transaction happens to be the same as the buyer and repayer, but you couldn't tell without already knowing this.

For the Saudi Arabia deal, you can't see the supplier ("Various US Companies" – gee, thanks) or the buyer ("Unknown" – great) or the source of repayment (Sadara Chemical Company). Sadara Chemical Company is listed as the borrower, again, but the data doesn't tell you that.

Today House Democrats introduced a bill that would reauthorize the Export-Import Bank for another seven years. As corporate welfare is often a bipartisan sin, a pack of 57 House Republicans have called for a five-year authorization of the bank with their own bill. The Hill has more details here.

Read more criticism about the absurdly unnecessary Ex-Im Bank by de Rugy and others at Reason here.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

9 responses to “Export-Import Bank Data Returns, With Important Info Still Missing

  1. The D’s plan to extend for 7 years sucks! Let’s only extend for 5 years! That will show them we are the party of small government.

  2. Today House Democrats introduced a bill that would reauthorize the Export-Import Bank for another seven years. As corporate welfare is often a bipartisan sin, a pack of 57 House Republicans have called for a five-year authorization of the bank with their own bill.

    The House as decided to compromise and authorize the Import-Export Bank for another twelve scrutiny-free years.

    1. Just like the Dreadnaught debate – “The Conservatives wanted six; the Liberals wanted four; we compromised on eight.”

  3. This article says that de Rugy sampled three transactions. Has someone been able to compare the data in the re-released set with data that existed in the original set? Has anything been changed?

    1. That’s what she’s showing here. The first three transaction IDs are what was on the original data. Then after that, she goes through what is now missing from each item that used to be there.

      1. Heh. I doubt Joec578 will read your answer any better than he read your original pre-answer.

  4. I love how Boeing becomes “Various US Small Businesses”

  5. I’ve made $64,000 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Heres what I’ve been doing,,,,,,,,,
    http://www.work-mill.com

  6. I just got paid usd6784 working off my laptop this month. And if you think that’s cool, my divorced friend has twin toddlers and made over usd 9k her first month. It feels so good making so much money when other people have to work for so much less. This is what I do,,,,,,
    http://www.work-mill.com

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.