Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

ISIS Video Shows Pilot Being Burned Alive, Mockingbird Sees Sequel, Selfies Blamed for Plane Crash: P.M. Links

Scott Shackford | 2.3.2015 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • A video from the Islamic State appears to show a Jordanian pilot in a cage being burned alive. Authorities are trying to validate the video itself, but the head of Jordan's military told his family the pilot had been killed earlier in the month.

  • Harper Lee is going to be publishing a sequel to To Kill a Mockingbird, called Go Set a Watchman. The book was actually completed in the 1950s but set aside. It will be published this July.
  • Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) says the current attention to what politicians have said about vaccinations is "largely silliness stirred up by the media." He doesn't believe politicians like Gov. Chris Christie are actually opposed to vaccinations and pointed out, furthermore, vaccination guidelines are a state matter. Millennials, incidentally, seem less likely to think vaccinations should be mandatory than older generations.
  • The National Transportation Safety Board believes a deadly small plane crash in Colorado may be a result of the pilot and passengers taking selfies.
  • Russia has apparently released an activist it arrested and accused of treason for phoning the Ukrainian embassy in Moscow and warning them about troops entering Eastern Ukraine. She still faces a trial and up to 20 years in prison.
  • Credit rating firm Standard & Poor has agreed to a $1.5 billion settlement for the way it rated mortgage securities, helping inflate the housing bubble last decade.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Suspiciously Small Deposits Trigger Legalized Bank Robbery

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (352)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) says the current attention to what politicians have said about vaccinations is "largely silliness stirred up by the media."

    New frontrunner!

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Hello.

    2. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

      "I can't possibly give sane answers, so the fact I sound crazy is clearly the media's fault for asking the questions!"

      1. MJGreen   10 years ago

        Is what Christie said not a sane answer?

        I looked at it today and wondered how the hell it could be spun to make him look bad. The only offensive thing about his comments is how bland they are. It was a typical political non-answer.

      2. wareagle   10 years ago

        it's a question undeserving of an answer, reminiscent of the debate wherein Romney was asked about contraception, a topic that no one was saying a thing about.

        1. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

          No, it's a question with a simple answer: the government has no business telling people what contraception they can or can't use. The problem is Romney wants to pander to a bunch of OMG, CONTRACEPTIONS IS TEH ABORTIONS loonies. The fact simple question make it harder for you to keep your crazy base happy is not a problem with the press.

          1. WTF   10 years ago

            No, it's a question with a simple answer: the government has no business telling people what contraception they can or can't use.

            And,the government has no business forcing other people to pay for your contraception. Which is the real issue, but morons like to pretend not forcing other people to pay for your shit is somehow 'denying access'.

  2. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

    Harper Lee is going to be publishing a sequel to To Kill a Mockingbird, called Go Set a Watchman. The book was actually completed in the 1950s but set aside. It will be published this July.

    Still faster than GRRM.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

      NO SPOILERS.

      1. Dances-with-Trolls   10 years ago

        HAHAHAHA suck it!

        1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

          Boo Radley always pays his debts.

    2. some guy   10 years ago

      For his own sake he better finish before he dies. Otherwise his fans are going to storm the mortuary, steal his body, freeze it on dry ice and resurrect him in some future post-apocalyptic hellscape.

    3. Certified Public Asskicker   10 years ago

      Wow, Harper Lee is alive?

      1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

        Barely.

      2. John Titor   10 years ago

        She's more machine now than woman.

    4. Banjos   10 years ago

      To Kill a Mockingbird II: Mockingbird's Revenge

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

        The Search for Atticus' Gold
        The Phantom Lynching
        Killing the Mockingbird Even Deader
        To Milk a Franchise

        1. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

          Don't forget the prequel, To Be Annoyed by a Mockingbird

          1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

            To Kill a Mockingjay with a bow and arrow

            1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

              Mockingbird and Mocking-bird-ier.

              1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

                Killing Cock Robin for Finking on the Mockingbird.

                1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

                  "I'm tired of the m_____f_____ mockingbirds on this m_____f______ plane!"

        2. Agammamon   10 years ago

          To Kill A Mockingbird II: Mock Harder

      2. Apple   10 years ago

        To Mock a Killingbird

      3. Stickler Meeseeks   10 years ago

        Mockingbird 2: The Enkilling-ing

        1. DEATFBIRSECIA   10 years ago

          Mock n Mole High School!

          1. Mock-star   10 years ago

            To Kill a Mockingbird 2: The Electric Bugaloo.

    5. Zeb   10 years ago

      So, when is Harper Lee going to get criticized for suggesting that one should not necessarily always believe accusations of rape?

      1. MJGreen   10 years ago

        We'll have to see if that's part of the new book. If it is... I don't know how some feminist sites aren't going to take the bait.

      2. straffinrun   10 years ago

        Goaaaal!

    6. Robert   10 years ago

      I keep getting that one mixed up with One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, same way I mix up On The Beach with On The Waterfront

  3. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Credit rating firm Standard & Poor has agreed to a $1.5 billion settlement for the way it rated mortgage securities, helping inflate the housing bubble last decade.

    I just knew it couldn't be public policies to blame!

    1. The Other Kevin   10 years ago

      That's how we like our justice, nice and swift.

    2. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

      Where's the settlement extracted from our politicians for the way they talk about the "solvency" of Social Security, and Medicare/Medicaid, helping inflate a welfare bubble?

      1. some guy   10 years ago

        Their settlement is that they have to retire to Martha's Vineyard or a ranch in Texas or some such.

    3. some guy   10 years ago

      What, you expect the USG to fine itself?

    4. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      Is this the same S&P that downgraded the U.S. credit rating?

      1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

        Why, coincidentally, it is! Isn't that a conveniently unrelated matter?

        1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          Why yes, yes it is. Huh.

          Not sure how S&P is that culpable, as a lot of the misinformation came from the banks and lenders that the feds bailed out for some reason I can't fathom.

          1. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

            Yeah, I mean who could expect a company that's getting paid to make independent ratings to verify anything it's told?

            1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

              You're right, they erred in believing that consumers, assessors, lenders, etc. weren't all bullshitting their way through mortgages. I agree they should've been more skeptical.

              That said, they were rating mortgage-backed securities, not individual mortgages, so there wasn't any feasible way to dig into each mortgage. Many, on paper, looked fine.

              1. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

                there wasn't any feasible way to dig into each mortgage

                Which frankly should have been a red flag in and of itself.

                They ultimately could have just decided "the structuring of these investments is such that it's impossible to assess them, and as such we refuse to issue a rating on them".

                1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

                  Yes, that's my view now. The honest truth is that everyone assumed lenders were generally in compliance with the law and with good business practices and refused to realize how bad the bubble was. This really goes for just about everyone involved, including the various regulators. Remember, many of these lenders were getting A+ scores from regulators, Fannie and Freddie, etc.

                  The government is largely to blame for pushing demand through the roof, limiting the ability of lenders to use risk-based pricing, establishing bad practices as a rule of thumb through the GSEs, and, of course, buying up bad paper left and right.

                  1. GILMORE   10 years ago

                    "The government is largely to blame for pushing demand through the roof, limiting the ability of lenders to use risk-based pricing, establishing bad practices as a rule of thumb ...etc"

                    This

                    the people who froth about "why no wall st CEOs in jail!?!" dont deserve to have an opinion on the issue because they don't even understand what happened.

                    the system itself is highly incentivized by rate policy and lending standards - the government crushed rates and was endlessly pump-priming, while simultaneously actively pulling the regulatory limitations *away* from lenders - literally *forcing them* to put X percent of loans into an otherwise "non-marketable" category of products.

                    They did this while making it unprofitable to use treasuries as a reserve asset; basically doing everything possible to ensure a tectonic shift of credit flowing into real-estate markets.

                    Cartoon version = Government handed out booze, fireworks and gasoline to all the kiddies, and then gave all the firefighters a paid vacation to Tahiti for a month.

                    And then Government blames the guy who periodically checks the batteries on the fire alarms for dereliction of duty.

                    1. straffinrun   10 years ago

                      Spike the punch bowl and set up DUI check points down the street. It's brilliant in a way.

    5. The Last American Hero   10 years ago

      Where's the perp walk?

  4. R C Dean   10 years ago

    Here's hoping the Jordanians carry out their threat to execute ISIS prisoners.

    Naturally, one has low expectations of the due process involved, but as a committed multiculturalist, I say we refrain from imposing our Western notions on these folks.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      It's all about kicking the Western infidels out.

      /sarc.

    2. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

      I wonder if ISIS cares.

      1. The Laconic   10 years ago

        If I were ISIS, I would kill the prisoners myself.

        Then again, I'm Keyser Soze.

        1. straffinrun   10 years ago

          Why is your lawyer named "Kobayashi" when he's clearly not Japanese?

          1. Gray Ghost   10 years ago

            He's a member of this commentariat, and therefore obligated to be a ST 2:WoK fan?

      2. Scarecrow Repair   10 years ago

        I wonder if ISIS wants their prisoners killed just as a recruiting drive.

        I see a lot of these Muslim warriors, like ISIS, as sick and tired of their miserable life in the desert. Whether they wish the modern world would go away or they wish Islam were a happier religion or they hate so many foreigners in their sandbox, I do not know, and it doesn't matter -- they are just sick and tired and ready to blow things up, to lash out in frustration and despair. All it would take is one in a hundred to feel that way for ISIS to make a lot of trouble, and if Jordan executing their prisoners increases recruiting and fires up (heh heh) their base, that's all they care about.

        ISIS have quite well demonstrated that they are just fucking nuts and want nothing more or less than a puritanical theoracy with them setting the rules.

    3. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      Yo, fuck these guys. Maybe we should give the Kurds some big-ass weapons.

      1. db   10 years ago

        I wonder if ISIS keeps doing this in order to provoke a disproportionate response, after which they expect to involve other regional nations in a larger war. Clearly they think they have a winning play, but what it might be is anyone's guess. Could they have a real WMD that they would only use if attacked on a large scale? Or are they just bugfuck insane?

        Are they some sort of apocalyptic sect that wants to start the end?

        1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          I suspect they may see the end, only they'll be viewing that mostly on their own.

          1. db   10 years ago

            They may in fact do that, but it seems tailor made to drag the U.S. back into a military quagmire. Al Qaeda's goal for a long time was to bankrupt the U.S. wi5h endless war, is ISIS attempting the same?

            Think of how much of our.national product we have.poured down the war drain in the middle east. Another protracted conflict will only put us deeper in debt while having little to show for it.

            1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

              Fuck it, nuke the Moon.

            2. Gray Ghost   10 years ago

              They may in fact do that, but it seems tailor made to drag the U.S. back into a military quagmire.

              Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner!

              These guys are almost cartoonishly-designed to push every button to piss us off that we have. While not pissing us off enough to glass the entire area. Isn't it more likely that this group (ISIS, Dashe, whatever else they're calling themselves this week) is designed to inflame the West, get the West militarily back into that region of the world, and thereby have them readily available to support the various Sunni dictators in the region? Because, God forbid, the Wahabbi absolute dictators in Saudi and some of the Emirates end up like Ben Ali, or Mubarak, or Assad, or Khadafi, etc...

              Only explanation I have for why ISIS, et al, act the way they do, yet don't strike in the U.S. (and God knows it'd be easy enough to do so.)

        2. Ketogenic Paleo   10 years ago

          You think they're being rational. You assume too much.

        3. Homple   10 years ago

          "Are they some sort of apocalyptic sect that wants to start the end?"

          These propositions are not mutually exclusive.

        4. Clich? Bandit   10 years ago

          Their winning play is to pass over the middle on 2nd down with 30 seconds and a time out.

          /noMarshawn

        5. Agammamon   10 years ago

          Could they have a real WMD that they would only use if attacked on a large scale?

          Yeppers, they found Saddam's hidden stash of WMD's that were on the border ready to fire in 90 minutes.

          1. Gray Ghost   10 years ago

            Where did all of those WMD's, calutrons that Scott Ritter saw being trucked away from uranium processing sites (presumably between dodging Chris Hansen's phone calls), the vats of chemicals they used against the Kurds and Iranians: where the fuck did they go anyway?

            You'd think after 10+ years of running the country, we'd have found them by now. Weren't they all supposed to have been shipped to Syria circa 2002? Did the same guys get them that intercepted all of the otherwise MUF from the former Soviet Union? Stuff beyond just Project Sapphire? If so, hats off.

        6. Drake   10 years ago

          They are purposely trying to destabilize Jordan. It's not a homogeneous country. They hope to divide them by stirring up passions.

    4. lap83   10 years ago

      "Here's hoping the Jordanians carry out their threat to execute ISIS prisoners."

      If they don't, it'll be worse than if they hadn't said anything.

      I don't know if it was the right thing to do on their part (honestly, I don't know if there is a right response) but it's refreshing to see a government that seems to actually care about the safety of their citizens. If this had happened to an American pilot I could see Obama saying how sad he was when he read about it in the paper before going back to his round of golf.

      1. R C Dean   10 years ago

        I don't know if it was the right thing to do on their part (honestly, I don't know if there is a right response)

        I can't think of a better one.

        "Oh, we're going to play Kill the Prisoners? Sure. You go first. Keep in mind, though, that you can only score one (1) dead prisoner. We can score many more."

        "Oh, you don't give a shit if we kill your people? That's supposed to convince me to not kill them? I don't think you understand how this game is played."

  5. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    The book was actually completed in the 1950s but set aside.

    Yeah, that'll be real relevant.

    1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      I'd say To Kill a Mockingbird is still relevant, so a sequel probably will be as well.

      1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        I seem to remember reading that her uncompleted, unpublished book was written before To Kill a Mockingbird.

        1. flye   10 years ago

          To Threaten a Mockingbird

          1. Catatafish   10 years ago

            "The Furtive Movements of a Mockingbird."

            1. flye   10 years ago

              To Pull Over a Mockingbird for a Minor Traffic Violation

              1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

                Scout Learns that Killing Mockingbirds is Illegal in Alabama.

            2. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

              Driving while mockingbird: 50 enemas later

              1. Clich? Bandit   10 years ago

                50 Shades of Mockingbird?

        2. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

          Not relevant? In the new book, Atticus Finch has to defend a fraternity at the University of Virginia accused of gang rape.

          1. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

            +1 Grab its mother fucking leg!

        3. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

          A prequel? Well, that means it will be much better than the original, right?

          1. Zeb   10 years ago

            Or perhaps a sequel written before the first book. What would you call that? "Squeprel"?

            1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

              Memento?

        4. Zeb   10 years ago

          her uncompleted, unpublished book was written before To Kill a Mockingbird.

          Partly written.

          1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

            And completed by me. You're all in it.

      2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        That we still talk about Atticus Finch only points to the staying power of the story, plot, themes and narrative of both the novel and film.

        I love that movie.

        1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          Great book, great movie. But the sequel will have tanks.

          1. mauricegirodias   10 years ago

            You're welcome.

        2. G?C   10 years ago

          If you ever get a chance to go, Monroeville, AL puts on a play of "To Kill a Mockingbird" every year. First half of the play is performed on the grounds of the Monroeville courthouse. Second half, dealing with the trial, moves into the courthouse itself (which was used as a basis for the movie). While it is definitely amateur, local theater (i.e., overacting by every, especially the children), I quite enjoyed it the two times I've seen it.

          If only the town had the funds to reanimate Gregory Peck's corpse to play Atticus, it would have been perfect...

      3. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        Still relevant? Who even uses the word chiffarobe anymore?

        1. UnCivilServant   10 years ago

          Did anyone ever? That is the only place I've ever seen it, even in literature that ran even older.

          1. Zeb   10 years ago

            Only female southern writers as far as I know. Flannery O'Connor mentioned chiffarobes in a few stories.

            1. Puddin' Stick   10 years ago

              Hmm, it's mentioned in several works.

              And apparently I had one growing up.

        2. The Hyperbole   10 years ago

          Tom Waits?

          1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

            ...for no man.

      4. John Titor   10 years ago

        Why would a story about a man falsely accused of rape be relevant in our wonderful future where we know that there's no such thing as false rape accusations?

      5. Libertarian   10 years ago

        The new book was written before Mockingbird, so it's not a sequel. Yet Scout is older, so it's not a prequel. What is it?

        1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          Presequel.

        2. John Titor   10 years ago

          Time travel, duh.

          1. Enough About Palin   10 years ago

            The Adventures of Warty Hugeman and the Mocking Doomcock of Doom

        3. Zeb   10 years ago

          A new book?

          I imagine a lot of editing and revision happened after Mockingbird.

          1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

            Yes, more science fiction elements.

        4. Puddin' Stick   10 years ago

          A publisher read it and said that the flashbacks were the best part and asked Harper Lee to expand on them.

    2. Jaybirdmojo   10 years ago

      Maybe it's proto-slashfic.

      1. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

        +1 boo radley paper doll

        1. Jaybirdmojo   10 years ago

          Hey, Boo. Come here. I was wondering if you could... bust up my chifferobe?

          1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

            Which one is Truman Capote?

    3. some guy   10 years ago

      They let SF rework it a bit for modern release.

  6. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    RNC Chair Reince Preibus talks about a problem of diluting bloodlines from the intermarriage of whites with other races. Just kidding!

    Rethuglican Governor Bobby Jindal complains about the diluting bloodlines from the intermarriage of Indians with other races. Just kidding!

    But DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Shultz on the other hand...

    When Democrats do it, it's not poisonous, ethnocentric chauvinism

    1. Tonio   10 years ago

      Wow, that's stunning.

      But expect to hear DWS go full idiot in the coming months. She will say all manner of things as trial baloons to see if they are safe enough to be platforms.

      1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

        I fully expect the media to give her a pass. If a GOP politician had said something similar, we would have all heard about it over and over again for 48 hours in the news. Heck, it would have been listed in the DNC fundraising emails.

        1. Illocust   10 years ago

          Well yeah, I mean your a prog and you hear about this story. Write about it or write about Rand Paul wants to kill children by denying them vaccines. Not a hard choice.

          1. Ted S.   10 years ago

            That's what they're saying about Rand Paul?

            1. The Last American Hero   10 years ago

              Yes. They said his vaccine comments just killed his campaign. Of course since They are a bunch of idiot progs, take it for what it's worth.

        2. Tonio   10 years ago

          Yes, they will. Huge double standard.

      2. Ted S.   10 years ago

        She hasn't been full idiot for years already?

        1. Tonio   10 years ago

          Oh, I don't think we've seen full idiot yet. Keep the popcorn ready.

    2. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

      You know who else was worried about Jews intermingling with gentiles?

      1. Dances-with-Trolls   10 years ago

        Jehovah?

      2. Bam!   10 years ago

        Jewish mothers?

        1. Scarecrow Repair   10 years ago

          Jewish step-children?

      3. some guy   10 years ago

        Moses?

      4. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

        Someone whose name is eventually mentioned, thanks to Godwin's Law?

      5. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

        Now for the bonus round!

        You know who else with a German surname was concerned with intermingling Jews?

        1. PBR Streetgang   10 years ago

          Werner Herzog?

          1. Libertarian   10 years ago

            Moses Herzog?

            1. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

              Herzog Zwei?

              I mean, that was the point of the game, wasn't it?

        2. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

          Albert Einstein?

      6. Andrew S.   10 years ago

        My sister, who disowned me after my non-Jewish wife and I had a kid?

        1. EDG reppin' LBC   10 years ago

          Really? Your sister sucks.

          1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

            Yes, sorry to hear it.

        2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          A Joo in Florida? I don't believe it.

  7. Slammer   10 years ago

    I find it hard to see a difference between being an American sniper and burning someone alive in a cage.

    1. The DerpRider   10 years ago

      You know who else burned people alive...

      1. Tonio   10 years ago

        The Spanish Inquisition?

        1. Libertarian   10 years ago

          No one expected that.

      2. EDG reppin' LBC   10 years ago

        GG Allin?

      3. some guy   10 years ago

        Moses? Wait, that was water...

      4. Dances-with-Trolls   10 years ago

        Most of my Skyrim characters?

      5. flye   10 years ago

        Mola Ram?

      6. Ted S.   10 years ago

        Madame Ngo Dinh Nhu?

      7. Ted S.   10 years ago

        I'm also reminded of the death of St. Lawrence of Rome.

      8. John Titor   10 years ago

        Tibetan monks?

      9. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

        My kid with a magnifying glass in our backyard?
        Those toy soldiers never had a chance.

    2. Bill Dalasio   10 years ago

      Then you are a retard. Congratulations.

      1. Tonio   10 years ago

        I think Slammer was making a joke.

        1. Slammer   10 years ago

          Thanks, Tonio.

          1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

            We definitely need to get a sarcasm button for this site. There's about a dozen obvious ones missed daily at this point.

            1. Ted S.   10 years ago

              Perhaps commentators need to be more intelligent at recognizing sarcasm.

              1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

                And, there's #13.

                1. Clich? Bandit   10 years ago

                  I feel...as if...I am in some kind of loop..

              2. R C Dean   10 years ago

                Perhaps the universe needs to stop being so goddam idiotic that there is no longer any distinction between reality, sarcasm, and satire.

              3. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

                Poe's Law.

        2. Bill Dalasio   10 years ago

          Okay. My bad. Sorry Slammer. My apologies. I'll work on my sarcasm meter.

    3. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      Sheldon Richman? That you?

  8. Tonio   10 years ago

    A video from the Islamic State appears to show a Jordanian pilot in a cage being burned alive.

    OK, I get beheadings since they're traditional. They are also fairly quick if done properly. But that burning alive thing is full-on barbaric.

    1. Dances-with-Trolls   10 years ago

      Burning people alive is so 20th Century.

    2. Bam!   10 years ago

      OK, I get female genital mutilation since it's traditional.

      1. Tonio   10 years ago

        A traditional method of execution which has been used in many times and places throughout history, and is fairly humane (compared to other methods) if done properly.

        Are you really that stupid? Oh, yes, you are. Carry on.

        1. Ted S.   10 years ago

          I figured it was sarcasm.

          ISIS could always kill those people by scaphism.

        2. Tonio   10 years ago

          Given that poster's history, I'm going with idjit.

        3. John Titor   10 years ago

          Eh, burning people alive is still kind of 'traditional' in Middle Eastern societies. The Ottomans and other historical Islamic dynasties burned Muslims who converted to other religions alive, and during the Ridda Wars following Muhammad's death heretics were killed by being set on fire.

          1. Clich? Bandit   10 years ago

            Vlad impaled those people on 15 ft. tall spikes...alive...through the anus...

            1. John Titor   10 years ago

              Yeah, and he's apparently a national hero for it. I'm not taking pot shots at the Middle East alone, that kind of behaviour is basically the standard in human history.

            2. JeremyR   10 years ago

              Which he learned from the Turks...

    3. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

      It's not like he's Christopher Dorner.

    4. Lyle   10 years ago

      They reference a supposed quote from Mohammad to support burning this poor man alive.

      1. Harvard   10 years ago

        I think that was the one where Mo' referenced how hot adolescent girls were.

  9. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

    Credit rating firm Standard & Poor has agreed to a $1.5 billion settlement for the way it rated mortgage securities, helping inflate the housing bubble last decade.

    Finally, someone to blame. Now let's get back to calling banks racist for not giving loans to risky borrowers.

  10. Irish   10 years ago

    Canada goes full Stasi.

    'Police will be able to issue takedown notices, subject to the approval of a judge, to force website hosts based in Canada to destroy comments, blogs, or webpages that are found to promote or glorify terrorist organizations or attacks. People who have posted such material will be allowed to appear in court and defend their postings, although they will open themselves up to self-incrimination if they do so. If they don't appear in court, the judge can decide to order the information to be deleted anyway.

    Promoting terrorist attacks on a website could also net you up to five years in prison. The bill says that if someone intentionally advocates or promotes terrorism, "knowing or reckless as to whether it would result in terrorism," it is a crime.'

    Man, Harper sure has been a gigantic pile of shit, hasn't he?

    1. Dances-with-Trolls   10 years ago

      More of that increasing freedom I keep hearing about.

      1. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

        But gays and pot!

      2. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

        too much freedom!!11! balance between freedom and safety!!!11!

    2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      But he got rid of the LONG FORM CENSUS!

      Yeah. The Tories are terrible on issues of liberty.

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        By the way, they all are full of shit on liberty. Liberals, NDP, Conservatives. I don't need to mention the Greens.

        As an aside. Green is the color of envy.

        1. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

          It is sad. Canada is hopeless.

        2. John Titor   10 years ago

          Time for everyone to vote Rhino.

          1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

            YES!

          2. Winston   10 years ago

            Repeal the law of gravity
            Promote higher education by building taller schools
            Count the Thousand Islands to make sure the Americans didn't steal any[9]
            Reform the retail lottery scheme by replacing cash prizes with Senate appointments
            Seat the Queen of Canada in Buckingham, Quebec.

        3. Winston   10 years ago

          Liberals, NDP, Conservatives. I don't need to mention the Greens.

          The Bloc and Forces et Democracie have a sad.

        4. MJGreen   10 years ago

          🙁

        5. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

          On the bright side, I made someone in the NP comments section aware of the Libertarian Party, and he likes them.

    3. Paul.   10 years ago

      This is an affront to Canada's first amendment!

      1. Winston   10 years ago

        Is it a reasonable and justifiable limitation?

        1. Paul.   10 years ago

          Well, yeah, but... yeah, ok you got me there.

    4. Ted S.   10 years ago

      Goes? Canada wasn't already there?

      And what about the people who glorify the Canadian government's terrorist activities, like exporting Justin Bieber?

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        But TWO cast members on 'Firefly' were Canadian!

        That's okay though, eh?

        1. EDG reppin' LBC   10 years ago

          Other cool Canadians:
          SNFU
          D.O.A.
          Doughboys
          Asexuals
          The Nils
          Dayglo Abortions
          Subhumans
          Nomeansno

          And of course, you Rufus.

          1. Winston   10 years ago

            You forgot William Shatner, Michael J, Fox and Christopher Plummer!

          2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

            You know how to get to Rufus's heart.

  11. The Other Kevin   10 years ago

    At this point ISIS seems to be doing us a favor by involving other countries to the extent that they might actually do something, instead of saying "yes, yes, that's terrible" and then looking the other way.

    1. Tonio   10 years ago

      ^This. They are getting far too big for their britches, as we used to say.

    2. Dances-with-Trolls   10 years ago

      You'd say ISIS is "playing with fire," so to speak?

      1. Tonio   10 years ago

        Burn.

    3. GroundTruth   10 years ago

      Fine, let them (the "other countries") do something. Every time we get involved it backfires on us.

  12. Doghouse Riley Jr.   10 years ago

    Meanwhile, at the Social Justice League...

    1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      And there are people taking this seriously


      TBTabby
      21 Hours Ago
      Batman, who can only function as a superhero the way he does because he's rich, is calling other people privileged.

    2. Paul.   10 years ago

      That comic "others" the blind.

  13. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

    More news from the Land of Hope and Change:

    NSA still collecting Americans' phone records data, despite not knowing the program's worth

    "US President Barack Obama said more than a year ago in a speech that he wanted the phone records program to change, favoring an unknown non-governmental third-party entity to hold the records."

    I hereby volunteer to be the non-governmental third-party entity to hold the records. I promise I won't sneak a peek.

    1. Bam!   10 years ago

      Wouldn't a non-governmental third party be your phone company? And then if the government wants the data, they must get a warrant.

      1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

        Warrant. Schmarrant.

        A simple "National Security Letter" will do. Or perhaps a mere phone call from the Director of the FBI some low level security bureaucrat.

  14. Derpetologist   10 years ago

    My tax refund this year was $22.

    "Yar, sometimes I wonder why I even plunder at all."

    Fortunately, I was able to answer yes to "did you have health insurance?"

    That saved me from a $925 penaltax. When I had a high-deductible plan 2 years ago, I was paying about $100 per month, so the penaltax is less than the yearly cost of that.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      The question is...

      WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH THE $22?

      1. Doghouse Riley Jr.   10 years ago

        He'd better not deposit it in a bank. That's a sure sign of structuring since it's less than $10k.

        1. Agammamon   10 years ago

          But he can't *not* deposit it, as withholding deposits to avoid scrutiny is also illegal.

      2. Derpetologist   10 years ago

        Pay part of the H & R Block preparation fee.

    2. Certified Public Asskicker   10 years ago

      $22 is solid, you never want a large refund. It means you fucked up.

      1. some guy   10 years ago

        I prefer to owe a bit. Interest-free short-term loan!

        1. Libertarian   10 years ago

          That used to mean something back when rates were all the way up into the single digits.

      2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        Dude, I really fucked up. I have a 5 figure refund coming.

        1. The Last American Hero   10 years ago

          A mere rounding error for the monocle wearing crowd.

        2. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

          Cool! Hey Playa, you hosting a big barbecue for all the H&R commentariat? Great way to spend your refund!

    3. The Other Kevin   10 years ago

      We did our taxes this week. I was surprised that all they did was ask if you had health insurance. No proof required. Maybe that's their way of making Obamacare look good - "According to the IRS, EVERY taxpayer reported that they were insured last year! Success!"

      1. some guy   10 years ago

        Like anything else regarding taxes it's only a lie if you get audited.

        1. Derpetologist   10 years ago

          Something, something the income tax has made more liars than golf.

    4. kinnath   10 years ago

      I will owe the feds a couple hundred bucks, but will get some back from the state.

    5. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

      I filed my taxes over a year ago.

      1. some guy   10 years ago

        You might want to file again, just in case they owe you.

      2. Derpetologist   10 years ago

        My favorite quote from that episode:

        IRS guy: Mr Simpson, this government computer can process nine tax returns a day. Did you really think you could fool it?

        Homer: No sir, sorry sir, an older boy told me to do it.

        http://vimeo.com/34934693

    6. Apatheist ?_??   10 years ago

      That means your witholdings were near perfect. Then again, I'm owing more than expected because of some changes last year and my penalty is only going to be like $20. Seems like a pretty good interest rate on a loan from the government. Only going to change my witholdings this year to avoid an audit rape party.

      1. Derpetologist   10 years ago

        When I lived in Chicago, I had a similar return where I ended up owing $20. Lousy state income taxes...

      2. Warren's Strapon   10 years ago

        a loan from the government

        The fuck?

    7. Donut-san   10 years ago

      penaltax

      Don't you mean "Shared Responsibility Payment?" Seriously, that's actually what they're calling it.

      1. Derpetologist   10 years ago

        Whoever came up with that phrase should be subjected to enhanced interrogation techniques.

        1. pogi   10 years ago

          Or invited to the next ISIS non-celebrity roast.

        2. Bobarian (hyphenated-american)   10 years ago

          And not none of this water-boarding shit; like real ISIS level, extradite you to Kazakhstan level 'interrogation techniques'.

    8. Juice   10 years ago

      I answered no, but I said I had a hardship, which I did this year, so I'm exempt from the mandate! This year I have insurance.

  15. paranoid android   10 years ago

    I'm surprised there hasn't been an HnR post about Cathy Young's mattress girl expose. It got mentioned in a thread earlier but I figured it deserved more attention so I'm putting it here.

    It's a long piece, but the tl;dr version is that she made it up and completely misrepresented the pursuant investigation to make herself out to be continually more of a victim, backed up by facebook posts and text messages that mattress girl herself confirmed are real.

    Contrary to what some people fear, stories like these do not actually make me less likely to believe the claims of assault victims--just the ones who make a very big show of putting a giant media spotlight on how damaged and pitiable they are.

    1. Tonio   10 years ago

      Thanks, Marv.

    2. Illocust   10 years ago

      It's not going to go anywhere. Unlike with Jackie, this isn't big enough in the news anymore for any feminists to make idiots of themselves by calling Cathy names, so it will all be quietly swept under the rug.

    3. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

      What is the accused guy going to do in a counter-stunt?

      Carry around a pillow?

    4. Tonio   10 years ago

      But, I suspect that the legacy media won't want to embarrass her patron, the US Senator. So this will die a quiet death.

    5. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      But in no way does being a victim confer any kind of status or advantage. I'm sure it's just a coincidence that mattress girl was a guest at the State of the Union.

      1. Tonio   10 years ago

        That's a good call, HP. She's been annointed, or is it accredited, I forget.

    6. Derpetologist   10 years ago

      It's hard for me to take these accusations seriously when no attempt is made to contact the police and the victim is nameless.

      In most of these cases, the victim knows the assailant, thus making it very easy to confront them.

    7. Paul.   10 years ago

      After a summer of affectionate and often intimate Facebook chats (screenshots of which Nungesser, who has since deactivated all of his social-media accounts,

      They do learn... often too late, but they eventually learn.

      1. Catatafish   10 years ago

        In his case though they ended up being his saving grace.

    8. Ted S.   10 years ago

      It's a long piece, but the tl;dr version is that she made it up and completely misrepresented the pursuant investigation to make herself out to be continually more of a victim,

      This isn't news.

    9. Irish   10 years ago

      I called this the first day I heard about it.

      I saw it get posted to twitter by New York Magazine's account, so I responded with something like 'So we're just assuming people are rape victims now even if there's no evidence of any crime?'

      I was immediately called a rape apologist.

      These people cannot learn. They're incapable of learning from mistakes. Some new and obviously false narrative will catch their attention next week, and any of us who doubt it will be considered friends of rapists.

    10. Paul.   10 years ago

      "When that article was published in early May, we did not know the man's identity. As far as I know, at that point in time, Ms. Sulkowicz had never publicly identified him."

      Then why did you run the story?

    11. MJGreen   10 years ago

      As one of the comments points out, forcibly ass-raping a struggling woman, without any assistance, is pretty much impossible. It's difficult to hit that particular moving target.

      But the facebook chats are so damning. She claims months later that she couldn't talk to him because it was triggering, but she was begging to meet up and hang with him for the weeks following the incident?

    12. Robert   10 years ago

      Why does someone do something like that?

  16. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

    Now we can all make sure our posts are in accordance with the New York Times gender neutral glossary

  17. Certified Public Asskicker   10 years ago

    Gawker has a problem with that McDonald's ad:

    McDonald's, the molded plastic king of America's molded plastic cuisine, has decided that money will no longer suffice to purchase its meager offerings; the company now demands that you degrade yourself in order to be fed...

    They promise to randomly offer McDonald's customers everywhere the chance to degradingly parade their most intimate feelings for their family members around in a McDonald's lobby in exchange for a few dollars worth of unhealthy fast food. If I had the temerity of the McDonald's corporation when it comes to advising Americans how to properly display their emotions, I would recommend that any customer asked to "Dial up your mom" instead call McDonald's corporate headquarters at 630-623-3000 and inform them of your deep disgust with their cynical marketing ploy, and of your intention to never again patronize their restaurants?which, as a former McDonald's employee, I assure you are staffed by underpaid workers all too ready to spit in your food at the slightest provocation.

    1. flye   10 years ago

      McDonald's workers are underpaid? Seems like they have no problem filling job vacancies.

    2. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      which, as a former McDonald's employee, I assure you are staffed by underpaid workers all too ready to spit in your food at the slightest provocation.

      IOW, asshole writer used to spit in people's food and assumes everyone else is as big as asshole as he is.

    3. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      At this point "Gawker" is an OED acceptable synonym for "misanthrope".

    4. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

      So vomit-inducing. The entire campaign is rooted in such normative understandings of what a "family" is, not matter how outdated that vision is. What if a person has two dads? What if their mother is dead, or they are estranged? Don't make assumptions about how people perceive "family."

      The first line of this comment seems oddly self aware... Oh wait.

      1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

        Why use the word "vomit-inducing?" Why not just say "nauseating?"

        1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

          Why use the word "vomit-inducing?" Why not just say "nauseating?"

          That's not in his 200 word vocabulary.

    5. The Laconic   10 years ago

      the company now demands that you degrade yourself in order to be fed...

      I'm pretty sure I can still walk into McDonalds and just pay cash for food.

  18. sloopyinTEXAS   10 years ago

    Stockton Unified Schools cop strip searches a 14-year old student and will face MISDEMEANOR charges.

    Scariest part of the whole thing?

    FTA (emphasis mine): Deputy District Attorney Elton Grau filed the complaint Jan. 26 in San Joaquin County Superior Court. He declined to comment on the facts of the case, because they are part of an ongoing court case.
    He did, however, say, law enforcement agencies at schools must have a reasonable suspicion that a child has a weapon on him or her in order to search the child.

    The fucking district attorney thinks reasonable suspicion is grounds to commit a fucking strip search on a 14-year old? No PC, no warrant, just reasonable suspicion.

    What. The. Fuck.

    1. sloopyinTEXAS   10 years ago

      By the way, the sexual assaulter is also the head of the local police union.

    2. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      In loco parentis. Because parents strip-searching their 14-year-old wouldn't face any charges what-so-ever. What. So. Ever.

      1. Doghouse Riley Jr.   10 years ago

        Hey, at least the cop didn't leave the 14 y.o. in a car while he went to a wine tasting.

      2. GroundTruth   10 years ago

        jee, I never got strip searched by my parents, they must not have loved me.

    3. Juice   10 years ago

      Clarence Thomas said it's ok.

  19. Slammer   10 years ago

    This from a guy who represents Florida Man:

    Democrat Alcee Hastings calls Texas 'crazy' State

    1. Injun, as in from India   10 years ago

      Yeah, man. It's crazy how they have been #1 in job creation. Abso-f***ing-lutely crazy.

      1. wadair   10 years ago

        Jobs, schmobs. Who needs jobs when you can have free Shit?!

    2. sloopyinTEXAS   10 years ago

      He's no better than his esteemed colleague, Florida Woman.

      1. sloopyinTEXAS   10 years ago

        Meanwhile, in neighboring Georgia, they think islands can tip over.

      2. Libertarian   10 years ago

        Remember this?

        What should the United States do to stop what's going on in Freedonia?

        Asked that question, a number of House freshmen, clearly not fans of the Marx Brothers, offered answers that included "take action" and "it's a different situation than the Middle East."

        Not one got the joke.

        The joker was Spy magazine, whose staff revived the sovereign but fictitious nation of Freedonia from "Duck Soup," the 1933 Marx Brothers movie.

        Posing as the host of a New York radio talk show, Spy's staff called about 20 first-term House members and, after a series of innocuous questions, asked, "Do you approve of what we're doing to stop what's going on in Freedonia?" or "Do you approve of what we're doing to stop ethnic cleansing in Freedonia?"

        The responses, apparently based on the assumption that the questioner was asking about Bosnia, came readily.

        Representative Corrine Brown, Democrat of Florida, said she approved of what the United States was doing in Freedonia, and added, "I think all of those situations are very, very sad, and I just think we need to take action to assist the people."

        http://www.nytimes.com/1993/01.....to-oz.html

        1. Robert   10 years ago

          Although I'm familiar with the movie & the fictional country name, I'd've assumed they were referring to Fredonia, NY.

  20. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

    Rand Paul has really fucked up with this vaccine shit. I am even seeing people link it on my FB and I'm in Canada. Why in the hell did he say anything about it? Dumb.

    1. Doghouse Riley Jr.   10 years ago

      Maybe he needs to be a non-running running candidate like Hillary.

    2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      I agree.

      I believe Ontario is stepping up measures to make it mandatory.

    3. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      What did he say? All I saw was that he said it shouldn't be mandatory.

    4. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      He can easily walk it back, but we'll see if he does.

  21. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

    To Kill a Mockingbird: modern classic or patriarchal rape denial fiction?

  22. sloopyinTEXAS   10 years ago

    This is why we need to pay our brave first responders more. It's obvious they are resorting to other methods in an attempt to feed their poor, starving families.

  23. widget   10 years ago

    Harper Lee is going to be publishing a sequel to To Kill a Mockingbird, called Go Set a Watchman.

    Was 'Go Set a Watchman' also edited by Truman Capote? I'm nuts about Capote. I would read a McDonald's menu over and over if it were written by Capote.

    1. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

      If I wanted to know more about Truman Capote, the person, what you recommend I do? The only thing I've done so far is watch the 2005 biopic with PSH.

      1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        Watch Murder by Death.

        1. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

          TCM had a Neil Simon marathon all last month. Did they air Murder by Death? I didn't see it.

          1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

            Time for a poignant, yet stinging, letter to TCM management. Written in longhand.

          2. Doghouse Riley Jr.   10 years ago

            I believe it was on the first night of the marathon.

            1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

              Time for a poignant, yet stinging, retraction of the letter you wrote to TCM management. Also written in longhand.

              1. Doghouse Riley Jr.   10 years ago

                CT should also subscribe to the TCM program guide Now Playing. In fact, he should get two subscriptions so he can cancel one when morally outrage requires it.

                1. Doghouse Riley Jr.   10 years ago

                  MORAL outrage.

                  Preview fail.

              2. Ted S.   10 years ago

                Second night. 8:00 PM on January 9.

      2. widget   10 years ago

        I don't know. He wanted to be a celebrity after his best works were published and that's how he's been most known, at Studio 54 and such.

        "The Grass Harp", a short story (and movie), seems to be an semi-autobiographical of his youth.

  24. Stickler Meeseeks   10 years ago

    MILLENNIAL POLL!

    http://fusion.net/story/41972/.....tion-2016/

    ...and they want Hillary!

    1. Derpetologist   10 years ago

      Fun fact: the country music video for Hillary is only the 3rd worst thing in the known universe. This Hillary Clinton song is the worst:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLSWudoqtWE

    2. Winston   10 years ago

      Libertarian Moment! Libertarian Generation!

  25. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

    Millionaire criticizes other Millionaire for grabbing crotch

    1. Certified Public Asskicker   10 years ago

      The worst part is Foote slobbering over the idea of authority.

      1. The Last American Hero   10 years ago

        He "went to school" in Ann Arbor, what do you expect?

  26. F. Stupidity, Jr.   10 years ago

    The National Transportation Safety Board believes a deadly small plane crash in Colorado may be a result of the pilot and passengers taking selfies.

    Did they keep taking them until impact?

    1. db   10 years ago

      They were in night instrument meteorological conditions, taking flash pictures in the cockpit. That is a terribly distracting thing to do. They were flying a Cessna 150 which almost certainly had no autopilot, so the pilot would have needed a pretty large amount of his.own personal concentration to maintain control of the plane. Evidently they were doing all this at a low altitude above ground level. It's like a perfect storm of piloting stupid.

      1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        So plane sex is right out, then?

  27. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

    Stay classy Quebec.

    http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/n.....-1.2212478

    1. Derpetologist   10 years ago

      This is best clip I have for this:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9y9lSMLK2U

      1. Winston   10 years ago

        N'est pas Joual.

  28. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

    One month after minimum wage hike, progtopia established!

    Complete with moronic "multiplier" comments.

    1. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

      Correction: 9 months

    2. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      It's amazing, not just the total absence of any understanding of economics, but of logic as well. If more wages makes everything better, why not $100/hour? Boom times, baby!

      1. Derpetologist   10 years ago

        Stossel put this question to David Sirota. Hilarity ensued.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywDuCEIeHnM

    3. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

      Funny story, all of the "positive effects" mentioned in the article were already planned and approved prior to the wage hike. Another funny story, the airport is part of Seattle, not SeaTac.

      The article is simply wrong, but the progs wank to it nonetheless.

      1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        Well, to be fair, they have nothing if they don't have their delusions. Reality is not their friend.

    4. Juice   10 years ago

      Instead, his business, the Cedarbrook Lodge hotel, is expanding, adding 63 more beds to meet demand. Instead of layoffs, he needs to hire more people. And his story is not the only one.

      Raising the minimum wage caused more customers to want hotel rooms. It's fucking magic.

      1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

        The comments on that article are as ludicrous as any I've ever read. About 3/4 insist that the Koch brothers' sole goal is to destroy the middle class in the USA, there is no other reason for their political activism. The other 1/4 say "libertarianism is all about I've got mine, screw you."

        And yes, all seem to believe that the economy is better completely due to people who are making $15 an hour spending all that windfall cash on hotel rooms and restaurant dinners.

        1. Trouser-Pod   10 years ago

          "DAYUM!! Got muh raise! We're stayin' at the Cedarbrook tonight!

  29. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    What should the United States do to stop what's going on in Freedonia?

    "Go and break through the lines. And remember, while you're out there risking life and limb through shot and shell, we'll be in be in here thinking what a fool you are."

  30. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

    Suppose you're captured by ISIS and given a choice between being beheaded and being burned alive.

    Which do you pick?

    1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      Getting shot trying to escape?

      1. Dances-with-Trolls   10 years ago

        ISIS is doing an excellent job in their quest to make sure all of their enemies will fight to the death.

        1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          That's what I was thinking.

        2. Ken Shultz   10 years ago

          If ISIS keeps beheading people and burning them alive and such, very soon, Obama is going to feel compelled to do something just as stupid in his own way.

          1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

            You mean taking hostages and executing them? That's seems a bit extreme, even for Obama, though I guess he might decide that it's the hip thing to do.

            1. Agammamon   10 years ago

              Obama does not take hostages. Like the mighty Zeus, he smites his enemies from above where'er they may try to hide.

    2. Derpetologist   10 years ago

      Since when is burning people alive an Islamic punishment? I thought it was all swords and stones for them.

    3. califernian   10 years ago

      Convert to islam

    4. Bobarian (hyphenated-american)   10 years ago

      I'd try to bite a motherfucker to death, given no other recourse.

  31. DJK   10 years ago

    OT, but pertinent given today's debates. Here's the Volokh Conspiracy on views of scientists versus the public. And here they are on tort law and vaccination.

    1. Bam!   10 years ago

      Neither of those links work.

  32. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

    Want to feel disgusted/outraged? Apparently a chunk of the anti-vaxxer community has convinced themselves that it's possible to cure autism by giving their kids bleach enemas:

    The 5 Scariest Autism 'Treatments' (all 1 page despite clickbait style title)

    1. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

      Is that for washing out the bad humours?

    2. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

      That sounds dangerous.

  33. Jayburd   10 years ago

    "Hey Abdul,how do you like your Jordanian, regular or extra crispy? And may I also recommend the sushi."

  34. sandramelkins   10 years ago

    Hey you guys I have found the perfect job as a full time student, it has changed my life around! If you are self motivated and social media savvy then this is ideal for you. The sky is the limit, you get exactly how much work you put into to it.
    click on this link to get started and see for yourself????.
    ????? http://www.netcash50.com

  35. Vincent Milburn   10 years ago

    Mock... Yeah! Ing... Yeah! Bird... Yeah!...

  36. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

    He should have just steered away from the vaccine-brain disorder stuff. Why even go into that? And why in the hell does he think there is a link anyway?

  37. Robert   10 years ago

    There were kids who got brain damage from pertussis vaccine.

  38. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

    12 year old me when I flipped past Lizzy McGuire?

  39. Libertarian   10 years ago

    Bill Clinton? No, no, really, I keed! I keed!

  40. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

    I see one sentence, immediately clarified, that might've been problematic. But nothing that would be a big deal.

  41. XM   10 years ago

    "But I think the parents should have some input."

    Of course they should. How can the government make vaccines "mandatory"? Unless the government authorizes schools to do it. When I was growing in Asia the school collected blood and stool samples all the time.

    Schools and some other public places have now banned students without measles vaccination. No outrage?

  42. Robert   10 years ago

    "I like oatmeal for breakfast."

    What's the matter? You got something against eggs? Is it the cholesterol?

    "No, actually, I think the contribution of eggs in normal amounts to serum cholesterol in humans is an exaggerated concern, and in my case..."

    So then you think people watching their diet is a fad pursued by nuts?

    "No, and I wouldn't use the word `nuts'."

    Well, what word would you use, then, to describe anti-egg activists?

    "Anti-egg activists? I didn't know there..."

    So you make light of the opposition to egg donorship? I suppose you don't think it's a serious issue.

    "I wish you'd stop putting words in people's mouths. All I said..."

    There you have it: Senator Paul is in favor of deaf culture, whose advocates resist giving their children cochlear implants & teaching them to speak.

  43. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

    That's because you're sane and reading things in context. Try approaching it from a totalitarian point of view, and you see where this one sentence will linger for months.

  44. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    I was wondering if he just meant parents should decide, even if they aren't necessarily making the right decision.

  45. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    It's not like some kids don't have bad reactions to some vaccines; it's just a vastly smaller risk than them catching the disease they're immunizing against.

    I was disappointed to learn that my smallpox vaccine probably is no longer good. I was banking on surviving a mass small pox plague launched by terrorists.

  46. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    Interesting that they can speak English in the ER. Because God knows you don't want French surgeons operating on you.

  47. John Titor   10 years ago

    Welcome to the insanity that is Quebec's language laws. Bilingualism on a national level was clearly worth it.

  48. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

    It's amazing.

    The way it functions is simple:

    They rely on snitches.

    That's Quebec's idea of protecting their language. Well, it's really a dialect but who am I to get in the way of an insecure nationalist narrative?

    Protect a language by suppressing the rights of another.

    One can only nod their head in disappointment.

  49. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

    For the record, Bill 14 (tabled under the retarded PQ in 2014) would have forced me and my sister to communicate in French.

    Assholes.

    I was surprised Reason didn't pick up on the story back in the day. It was clearly a law that goes against everything we stand for.

  50. grrizzly   10 years ago

    It's a human right for a francophone Quebecer to pursue a career without an inconvenience of speaking or hearing English. That's what they really believe. I got it after watching a documentary about the horrors of working as an engineer in the '60s in Quebec, when your bosses spoke English only and pronounced your French name ? l'anglaise. That had to be stopped.

  51. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    Could you get around it by speaking something else? Like Flemish?

  52. Emmerson Biggins   10 years ago

    I'd tell them it was French, but I just like to use lots of loan words like "Fuck" and "You".

  53. Winston   10 years ago

    It was worth it. Canadian bilingualism was adopted after the Quebec nationalists dropped their Catholic pan-Canadian nationalism in favor of secular Quebec-centric French unilingualism. The only bilingual province is New Brunswick. It certainly stopped the 1980 and 1995 referendums. A huge success!

  54. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    Look, we're much freer now, so shut your mouth.

  55. Homple   10 years ago

    Maurice's little brother, Henri, was not exactly a slouch.

  56. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    They don't teach that in flying school.

  57. MJGreen   10 years ago

    My guess: he was in the middle of a frustrating interview, he was frazzled, and he reached back in his mind to some BS talking point he wrote or heard once. He felt compelled to give a reason not to vaccinate, and pulled that out.

    It was stupid. Hopefully he does walk it back, though I can't see it haunting him past this week. It's not really the stuff of an attack ad, and despite what excited pundits are saying today, vaccination will not be a campaign issue.

  58. Winston   10 years ago

    Quebec has gay marriage and no slavery, what's not to love?

  59. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

    Still butthurt over that thread I see.

  60. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    See--total freedom! It's like a libertarian utopia all around the world.

  61. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    How dare English speakers speak English!

  62. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    Yeah, I know, right? That's reserved for commercial and military pilots only.

  63. trshmnster the terrible   10 years ago

    He posted a pic of him getting a Booster shot today, with a snarky caption. I think it'll all blow over.

  64. Bobarian (hyphenated-american)   10 years ago

    And by terrorists, you mean... you?

  65. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    Of course not. I'd use asteroids to ensure compliance.

  66. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    More objecting to that line of reasoning. You see more freedoms, I see more government that can do anything it wants. . .including taking away freedoms.

    The political core of libertarianism is limited government.

  67. Swiss Servator, ... Switzy!   10 years ago

    Just more evidence that you have become a figure of mockery.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Growing Ranks of Military Homeschoolers Get Defense Department Support

J.D. Tuccille | 6.4.2025 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Road Hard

Charles Oliver | 6.4.2025 4:00 AM

Trump's Haste Begets Lawlessness

Jacob Sullum | 6.4.2025 12:01 AM

D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 6:00 PM

It's Rand Paul and Elon Musk vs. Donald Trump Over the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Eric Boehm | 6.3.2025 4:35 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!