Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Congress

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Nanny State) Will Step Down in 2016

Scott Shackford | 1.8.2015 1:10 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Below, watch Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California explain that she will not be running for re-election in 2016:

You didn't watch it, did you? You totally didn't. It's only three minutes! How could you not possibly want to watch Boxer, 74, answer staged questions from her own grandson in what looks like a Marriott timeshare condo somewhere?

Okay, I can't blame you. I had to force myself to watch it even though I get paid to watch these things. Yes, Barbara Boxer is stepping down come 2016. No, she has little interesting to say or show about her career as a senator. She was a solid "company man" Democrat, partisan all the way down (Here she is recently being "shocked" at criticism of Secretary of State John Kerry). One bright spot: She was one of the 23 senators to vote against authorizing the Iraq War in 2002.

She's a supporter of big government as our savior and protector, and that included protecting us from ourselves. You can read through Barbara Boxer on the issues here and guess where she'll come down with fairly few surprises.

More recently, Boxer has been on board the college rape panic train, introducing legislation to require more campus administrative involvement in dealing with rape accusations. She took it a weird step further by trying to push all California colleges to get "advocates" for rape survivors on campuses, including community colleges, which is like demanding that a mall get an advocate for rape victims.

Here's Reason on Barbara Boxer. And here she is famously demanding she be called "senator," not "ma'am," apparently oblivious of which term actually affords more respect:

 

The Sacramento Bee is already tossing out Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Kamala Harris as likely 2016 Democratic candidates. They both obviously have higher ambitions (Harris' office sends out so many press releases you'd think she was already a senator), but whoever misses out will presumably get the chance to be the top Democratic choice for governor come 2018. As for Republicans, I can't even begin to guess at this point, but there's already jokes on Twitter about Scott Brown moving out here to the Golden State. The funny thing is that he could possibly be a contender here if he made it through the primary.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Judge Says Iowa State Wrong on All Counts in Free Speech Case

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

CongressSenateBarbara BoxerCaliforniaElection 2016
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (83)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Sevo   10 years ago

    "You didn't watch it, did you? You totally didn't. It's only three minutes! How could you not possibly want to watch Boxer, 74, answer staged questions from her own grandson in what looks like a Marriott timeshare condo somewhere?

    Busted! Scott, you got my number.

    1. Mainer2   10 years ago

      ...and sometimes people comment without reading the articles at all...shhhh

      1. F. Stupidity, Jr.   10 years ago

        Articles? What articles?

      2. Sevo   10 years ago

        "...and sometimes people comment without reading the articles at all...shhhh"

        I read the article and I'm still not watching that hag. Not even for 30 seconds.

        1. Mainer2   10 years ago

          that was a general comment, not directed at you

        2. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

          "...and sometimes people comment without reading the articles at all...shhhh"

          I don't even read the comments above mine.

  2. Mainer2   10 years ago

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixiYZ9DPk8o

    Call me Senator...classic

    1. Counterfly   10 years ago

      OK ma'am.

    2. Mainer2   10 years ago

      forgot to mention bonus Clint Howard

    3. Roger the Shrubber   10 years ago

      That I watched. 4 stars. Would watch again.

  3. Swiss Servator, Winter...jetzt   10 years ago

    "You didn't watch it, did you? You totally didn't."

    Guilty as charged.

  4. Counterfly   10 years ago

    As usual, there's a nice Randy Quaid quote that applies to this.

  5. Swiss Servator, Winter...jetzt   10 years ago

    "Boxer has been on board the college rape panic train"

    Oh, college rape panic train soundin' louder.
    Glide on the rape panic train.
    Ooh, ah, ee, ah, ooh, ah.
    Come on, now rape train.
    Yes, college rape panic train holy roller.
    Everyone jump on the rape panic train.
    Ooh, ah, ee, ah, ooh, ah.
    Come on, now rape panic train.

  6. Episiarch   10 years ago

    She took it a weird step further by trying to push all California colleges to get "advocates" for rape survivors on campuses, including community colleges, which is like demanding that a mall get an advocate for rape victims

    Weird? Just look for the lobbyist and it won't be weird. I guarantee whatever professional group would provide the "advocates" threw her some money for this.

    Whenever a politician pushes for legislation that doesn't make much sense (so, pretty much all of it), always look for who's greasing them.

    1. jmg09   10 years ago

      Absolutely, and Boxer is very greasy. She opposes audits of Medicare and Medicaid payments because hospitals that were overcharging tax payers complained to her.

    2. Mainer2   10 years ago

      Money and Power

    3. PapayaSF   10 years ago

      I'd say it's not Boxer being greased, but her desire to have more tax money funneled to her ideological allies.

  7. jmg09   10 years ago

    Great. Now Californians can elect someone even worse. It doesn't seem possible, but it absolutely is.

    1. CE   10 years ago

      Yeah, I was like, finally. When does Feinstein retire? But then I was like, oh, the same people who elected those two will elect their successors.

      There are a lot of conservatives in California, but they are surrounded and outnumbered. Too bad the Six Californias initiative got kept off the ballot on a technicality.

      1. albo   10 years ago

        Feinstein's gotta retire or die soon. She's 81. I don't think she's got the genetics of Strom Thurmond.

    2. albo   10 years ago

      Ben Affleck for US Senator. Tagline:

      "Elect Ben: In Hollywood, He's Considered Smart!"

      1. Sevo   10 years ago

        "Elect Ben: In Hollywood, He's Considered Smart!"

        In DC, he's even smarter!

        1. R C Dean   10 years ago

          Ben Affleck:

          Too smart for Hollywood.

          Too pretty for DC.

      2. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

        "Wicked Smaht!"

    3. kinnath   10 years ago

      Boxer is a senior senator with leadership positions on many committees (which she lost with the Republican take over, but she will still have a lot of influence for the next 2 years). She will be replaced by a freshman senator with coffee-fetching responsibilities on some set of committees.

      It will take awhile for her replacement to get back into the position to damage the whole country as badly as Boxer can now.

      1. Drake   10 years ago

        Luckily Boxer is completely incompetent. In 2009 she tried to write a truly awful Global Warming bill.

        If she was competent, it would have gotten done, been passed by Democrats in both houses and signed by Obama - and done terrible damage to the economy.

        Thanks to her stupidity, it never made it to the floor.

        1. kinnath   10 years ago

          I don't think we have to worry about CA electing anyone smarter that Boxer at this point.

  8. Free Society   10 years ago

    You didn't watch it, did you? You totally didn't.

    When I want to watch a video of a cunt flapping her lips I'll go to xvideos, thank you very much.

    1. Loki   10 years ago

      You owe me a new keyboard and monitor to replace the ones I just sprayed soda all over.

    2. kinnath   10 years ago

      Why does a woman have two sets of lips. So she can piss and moan at the same time.

      1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

        Zing!

  9. F. Stupidity, Jr.   10 years ago

    One bright spot: She was one of the 23 senators to vote against authorizing the Iraq War in 2002.

    More likely based upon "What action will please my group most?", but sure, a bright spot. Invisible hand and all that.

    1. CE   10 years ago

      More like a stopped clock being right once every 16 years or so.

    2. R C Dean   10 years ago

      Even odds she just hit the wrong button when she voted.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    What dipshit will the Golden State foist upon us next? Newsom? Harris? Clooney?

    1. Swiss Servator, Winter...jetzt   10 years ago

      SENATOR MATT DAMON!

      1. Restoras   10 years ago

        Let the derp flow!

      2. Free Society   10 years ago

        MATT DAAAAAMON

    2. jmg09   10 years ago

      At least if they elected Clooney, he wouldn't have time to make any more crappy movies.

      1. sarcasmic   10 years ago

        O Brother, Where Art Thou? wasn't terrible.

        1. Swiss Servator, Winter...jetzt   10 years ago

          +1 Dapper Dan Man

        2. CE   10 years ago

          The best movie of our generation.

          1. albo   10 years ago

            Damn, we're in a tight spot!

        3. CE   10 years ago

          But if Senator Clooney is elected, we is definitely his constituents.

          1. albo   10 years ago

            It's a fool that looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart.

          2. Drake   10 years ago

            I invented moral fiber.

        4. MJGreen   10 years ago

          They're making the third of their "dunce trilogy" now, so Clooney has one more Coen movie before he can be discarded.

        5. Drake   10 years ago

          That movie is now 15 years old. (one of those things that shock me now that my cable gives me the years for films)

    3. Sevo   10 years ago

      "Newsom?"
      Mostly pretty harmless, unless you get between him and a camera.

      "Harris?"
      She's ridden Willie Brown's coat tails pretty far; not sure they'll stretch any more.

      "Clooney?"
      GAG!!!!!!!!!!!

      1. CE   10 years ago

        Senator Jolie is my best bet.

        1. F. Stupidity, Jr.   10 years ago

          Seriously, she would be way better than a lot of people California might elect.

          Now if you'll all excuse me, I'm going to vomit into a tiny, oddly-shaped bucket.

      2. Slumbrew   10 years ago

        Newsom

        He's a total lightweight.

        This is pretty great - Carolla just crushes Newsom

  11. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Californians would never elect a white man to the Senate.

    1. Swiss Servator, Winter...jetzt   10 years ago

      What if he was teh Ghey?

  12. Taberlario   10 years ago

    Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
    This is wha- I do...... ?????? http://www.jobsfish.com

  13. Fred Vee   10 years ago

    Funny that Ms. Boxer was a carpetbagger (using her husband's money) when she came here to be the second "rich-wife" senator.

    1. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

      Huffington made a pretty good stab at being the "rich-husband" senator.

  14. Tman   10 years ago

    Sandra Fluke is readying her narrative.

    1. Free Society   10 years ago

      It would not suyrprise me at all if that waste of life became a member of congress. She's evil enough and ignorant enough to fit right in.

      1. Bill Dalasio   10 years ago

        And would it surprise anyone in the least if our modern-day symbol of strength and female independence married some rich old guy with the money to finance her run?

        1. F. Stupidity, Jr.   10 years ago

          Not at all. The guy will be some sort of moderate Republican and the press will fawn over the predictable angle of, "OMG OPPOSITES ATTRACT LOL!!!"

    2. Calvin Coolidge   10 years ago

      Now, now, there are worse wastes of oxygen than Sandra Fluke. For example, the people who tweeted on election night that they had just returned from the polls and were proud and honored to have just voted for Sandra Fluke.

  15. CE   10 years ago

    So the unbiased press calls Boxer a "liberal lion" and Cuomo a "political giant", but Ron Paul is just an iconoclast.

    1. KDN   10 years ago

      The only way to properly describe Barbara Boxer is "partisan hack." Anything else gives her waaaaaaaay too much credit.

      1. Free Society   10 years ago

        cunt does the job.

      2. Sevo   10 years ago

        "The only way to properly describe Barbara Boxer is "partisan hack.""

        You left out "dumb as rocks"

  16. Loki   10 years ago

    Clinton/ Boxer 2016?

    Because one dried up old prune isn't enough...

    1. sarcasmic   10 years ago

      Cuntsquared!

      1. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   10 years ago

        It's more like some multi-dimensional hyper-spacial quadratic that would open the way for the old gods to return...

        In his house at R'lyeh dead Cthulhu waits dreaming.

  17. kinnath   10 years ago

    Remember, the 2014 blowout was indicated by key democratic senators announcing their retirements starting just after the 2012 election.

    Boxer would not be announcing now if there was any indication of a democratic comeback in 2016.

  18. Brett L   10 years ago

    Testing comments on chrome for iphone

    1. Brett L   10 years ago

      Testing reply. Is it possible? Am I back?

      1. Swiss Servator, Winter...jetzt   10 years ago

        No, you are not here, and never were...

        /hand wave

      2. Swiss Servator, Winter...jetzt   10 years ago

        No, you are not here, and never were...

        /hand wave

      3. Loki   10 years ago

        No.

      4. sarcasmic   10 years ago
      5. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        Who said that?

    2. Jordan   10 years ago

      When I use Chrome on Android, I have to use the desktop version of the site to comment. On the mobile version, everytime I click the damn textbox, the page scrolls back to the top.

      1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

        Me, too. It sucks.

        1. Swamp Think   10 years ago

          Ditto

  19. Calvin Coolidge   10 years ago

    Barbara's ascension to the Senate was launched in 1991 when, as a US Representative, she led a march to demand that the Senate hold hearings on the charges that Clarence Thomas had made off-color jokes while Anita Hill was within earshot.

    It was fun to watch her repeatedly answer questions as to what she thought of the latest revelations about Bill Clinton's treatment of female employees by claiming to have no idea they existed and to not care.

    Sears should name their new line of hacksaws after her.

  20. Dread Pirate Roberts   10 years ago

    Don't let the door hit your bony old ass on the way out.

  21. Truth Teller   10 years ago

    Back in early 1992, Washington was rocked by the revelation that the House of Representatives was allowing members to overdraw their House checking accounts without penalty, leaving debts unpaid for months at a time. Then-congresswoman Barbara Boxer insisted for months that she'd had no problems with her account at the House bank. Then she admitted she had bounced 87 checks and did not know the amount. Bank records ultimately showed she bounced 143 checks worth $41,417. Boxer insisted she had no idea that she had bounced checks and only learned of the matter when she read about it in the press; but the Los Angeles Times obtained a letter from the House sergeant-at-arms, dated six months earlier, telling Boxer she had written overdrafts. I guess the current administration uses the same excuse of finding out about everything in the press, and obviously the LA Times was different back then.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Third-Rate Romance

Charles Oliver | 5.30.2025 4:00 AM

'Banal Horror': Asylum Case Deals Trump Yet Another Loss on Due Process

Billy Binion | 5.29.2025 5:27 PM

Supreme Court Unanimously Agrees To Curb Environmental Red Tape That Slows Down Construction Projects

Jeff Luse | 5.29.2025 3:31 PM

What To Expect Now That Trump Has Scrapped Biden's Crippling AI Regulations

Jack Nicastro | 5.29.2025 3:16 PM

Original Sin, the Biden Cover-Up Book, Is Better Late Than Never

Robby Soave | 5.29.2025 2:23 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!