John Stossel on Technology Versus 'Consumer Protection'


This Christmas Eve, if you see a fat man in a sleigh distributing presents, tell him he is in violation of several government regulations. In real life, government barely lets people give each other rides in cars.
Will government crush innovations like ride-sharing or room-sharing businesses? asks John Stossel. Politicians keep banning them. Every week it seems The New York Times runs a hostile story along the lines of: "Councilman Jones says these new services don't follow the regulations!"
But of course they don't, writes Stossel. The regulations make it impossible to make improvements. Regulators call themselves "consumer protectors," but often their main role is to ban better options. Luckily, technology allows capitalist innovation to move fast enough that these new businesses may stay ahead of the politicians' instinct to destroy things they think of as weird or dangerous.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?