Ira Stoll on the Lame Liberal Case for Expanding Presidential Power

How much power should a president have? Anyone who thought America settled that question late in the 18th century with the ratification of the Constitution hasn't been paying attention to the news.
The Speaker of the House, John Boehner, has hired law professor Jonathan Turley to represent the House in a lawsuit over President Obama's unilateral changes to the health care law. Meanwhile, Obama's executive action to defer deportation of certain illegal immigrants has generated opposition from Republican members of Congress, including Senator Cruz of Texas, who talks about a "lawless president."
Into this fight wades Harvard law professor and former Obama staffer Cass Sunstein, who, as Ira Stoll reports, says that the only cure for partisanship and gridlock is to give the president even more authority. Believe it or not, according to Sunstein, "the best response…[is] strengthening the hand of technocratic forces within government."
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?