David Harsanyi Wants the GOP Establishment to Stop Whining About Primaries
Although the specifics are still hazy, The New York Times reports that a group of deep-pocketed Republican donors and bundlers has hatched a plan to clear the GOP field of all insurgents to make room for a favored "establishment" candidate—preferably Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, or Mitt Romney. But there can only be one. Republican powerbrokers intend to get ahead of the intraparty squabbling that accompanies the long primary season because, in the end, they think all of that ugliness would only help elect Hillary Clinton.
David Harsanyi finds this strategy dubious. For one, there's scant evidence that bypassing crowded primaries enhances a party's chances of winning a national election. In fact, sometimes a primary makes the candidate. What's more, after seven years of functioning as the opposition, Republicans may actually have to sort out some substantive differences on policy, writes Harsanyi. And coronations do not lend themselves to self-examination.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?