Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Post Office

China Suspected of U.S. Postal Service Hack

Lucian McMahon | 11.10.2014 2:44 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Wikimedia Commons

As President Obama gallivants about in a Vulcan costume behind the Bamboo Curtain, his mandarin hosts have been busy spying on the United States Postal Service (USPS). The Washington Post reports that the Chinese government is suspected of breaching the computer networks of the senescent government agency charged with delivering our snail mail. The data of more than 800,000 employees have reportedly been compromised:

The compromised data included names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, addresses, dates of employment and other information, officials said. Every employee from the letter carrier to the postmaster general was exposed. But no customer credit card information from post offices or online purchases at usps.com was breached, they said.

The Postal Service was notified of the breach by the FBI and other federal agencies in mid-September. Planning to deal with the hack began immediately, but the actual remediation did not take place until the weekend.

Earlier this year, the Office of Personnel Management and a security-clearance contracting company were also hacked. But it was fairly clear why the Chinese government should target both these institutions: They are staffed by people with security clearances and access to potentially sensitive government information.

Experts are not entirely sure why China would target the USPS, of all places. But one potential reason for its interest in the Newmans of the federal workforce is that, well, China just doesn't know any better:

Some analysts say that targeting a federal agency such as the post office makes sense for China as an espionage tool. For one thing, the Chinese may be assuming that the U.S. Postal Service is more like theirs — a state-owned entity that has vast amounts of data on its citizens.

China might also just be vacuuming up as much data as possible in its search for new intelligence leads of any kind. Of particular interest, for example, could be the photographs of addressing information stored by the USPS at the behest of American law enforcement.

The Associated Press reports that the postal service security breach is one among many in recent years:

From 2009…to 2013, the number of reported breaches just on federal computer networks…rose from 26,942 to 46,605, according to the U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team or US-CERT. Last year, US-CERT responded to a total of 228,700 cyberincidents involving federal agencies, companies that run critical infrastructure like nuclear power plants, dams and transit systems, and contract partners. That's more than double the incidents in 2009.

But the zinger is that gullible or otherwise careless federal employees are responsible for at least half of known cyberattacks since 2010:

They have clicked links in bogus phishing emails, opened malware-laden websites and been tricked by scammers into sharing information.

Last year…about 21 percent of all federal breaches were traced to government workers who violated policies; 16 percent who lost devices or had them stolen; 12 percent who improperly handled sensitive information printed from computers; at least 8 percent who ran or installed malicious software; and 6 percent who were enticed to share private information.

Given the government's poor track record of protecting sensitive data, it may only be a matter of time before a serious breach threatens the personal information of millions of Americans.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Retired City Workers Accept Cuts (As Does Everybody Else) in Detroit's Bankruptcy

Lucian McMahon is the fall 2014 Burton C. Gray Memorial Intern at Reason.

Post OfficeCybersecurityChina
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (38)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Paul.   11 years ago

    Experts are not entirely sure why China would target the USPS, of all places.

    It's likely that the communists wanted to tap into the post office so they could see a cautionary tale from the inside. They wanted to know how not to run a government agency.

    1. Almanian!   11 years ago

      wanted to tap into

      Shorter China: "I'd hit that..."

    2. derpules   11 years ago

      They wanted to see what real communism looks like.

  2. Almanian!   11 years ago

    China might also just be vacuuming up as much data as possible in its search for new intelligence leads of any kind.

    Yeah, well, whatever it takes to thwart terrorists. If the NSA has to....wait.

    OH! The Chinese! Well, GODDAMNEDSUNOFABITCHMOTHERFUCKER I don't think so! No way! They can't vacuum up our citizens' data! Only WE can suck up all our citizens' data! Fuck those commies!

    1. Unreconstructed   11 years ago

      They can't do that to our pledges!
      Only *WE* can do that to our pledges!

  3. Hyperion   11 years ago

    Now the Chinese have our number, they're going to stop us from getting boxes full of junk mail. The horror!

    1. Riven   11 years ago

      Seriously. All I get in the mail is junk mail addressed to one of the last people who lived there.

  4. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

    They're after our stamps. It'll start off subtle, with stamps to honor Confucius and Lao Tzu, then it will be Mao, Mao, Mao, Mao, and Mao. All Mao, all the time.

    1. GILMORE   11 years ago

      It has already started!

    2. Paul.   11 years ago

      Who still buys stamps?

      1. Doghouse Riley Jr.   11 years ago

        People with a philately monkey on their back?

      2. Almanian!   11 years ago

        Hitler?

      3. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Maoists?

  5. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

    What happened to catching rival nations performing espionage being scandalous? I mean really scandalous, not news for a day. Is it because of the shenanigans of our own intelligence agencies?

    1. Almanian!   11 years ago

      *shoots selfie with ProL*

    2. Paul.   11 years ago

      If we declare China's spying illegal, then we have to start declaring our spying illegal, then it'll be spying anarchy!

      1. Almanian!   11 years ago

        We must address the spying gap!

        1. anon   11 years ago

          I declare spies to be a utility.

          1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

            Commie neutrality. I was going to say Tet neutrality, but I didn't want to be accused of implied racism in mixing Chinese with Vietnamese.

      2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Oh, what a tangled web we weave,
        When first we practice to deceive!

    3. anon   11 years ago

      What happened to catching rival nations performing espionage being scandalous?

      To be fair, does anyone consider the USPS to be anything but a welfare agency at this point?

      1. derpules   11 years ago

        How else would you get your taxpayer subsidized junk mail?

        1. anon   11 years ago

          Hitler?

    4. GILMORE   11 years ago

      "

      Pro Libertate|11.10.14 @ 3:01PM|#

      What happened to catching rival nations performing espionage being scandalous?"

      i think the prospect of a modern Julius and Ethel Rosenberg became less of a scandal around the time that politicians getting busted 'Tweeting pictures of their dicks' became a more-common occurrence.

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Okay, so you're saying that China is going to hijack our stamps with pictures of their leadership's penises on them?

        1. anon   11 years ago

          Wait, are those real? Cause I'd buy those.

          1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

            It's part of the Chinese attack on the American postal system.

            1. anon   11 years ago

              There are so many things wrong with that sentence that I think my brain is shutting down.

              1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                Look, I can't explain why the Chinese are doing this. I can only report the facts.

                One of the stamps they'll impose is the skull of Tank Man.

                1. anon   11 years ago

                  ProL, you seem to know an awful lot about "Chinese" intentions.

                  I'll leave it at that.

                  1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                    I subscribe to the NSA newsletter.

        2. GILMORE   11 years ago

          That is just Phase 1 of "Operation: Pee In Coke"

  6. Almanian!   11 years ago

    You know who else spied on other countries?
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Hitler.

    1. anon   11 years ago

      So what you're saying is that the USPS is Hitler?

      Or wait...

  7. anon   11 years ago

    I just figured it out. They're trying to forge Forever stamps. In 500 years, those things are going to be more valuable than gold. THAN GOLD I TELL YOU!

  8. Bardas Phocas   11 years ago

    The compromised data included names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, addresses, dates of employment and other information, officials said. Every employee from the letter carrier to the postmaster general was exposed.

    Now, if they only turn 1% of them ---- they'll have a cadre of the laziest double agents in human history - possibly galactic history!

    1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      My God, postal worker spies. The insidious brilliance of that plan!

  9. Carl ?s the level   11 years ago

    When you control the mail, you control... information!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Heavy-Handed Legislation Targets AI-Generated Replicas of Voices and Images

J.D. Tuccille | 6.27.2025 7:00 AM

Review: Avowed Is a Fantasy Game About the Benefits of Local Control

Peter Suderman | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Minimum Effort

Charles Oliver | 6.27.2025 4:00 AM

RFK Jr.'s Handpicked Vaccine Panel Unsurprisingly Delivers Antivaccine Conclusions

Ronald Bailey | 6.26.2025 5:35 PM

Using the National Guard in DEA Raids Is the Worst Kind of Drug War Mission Creep

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.26.2025 5:17 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!