Penn. Supreme Court Justice Suspended With Pay For Sending Employees Pornographic E-Mails


Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Seamus McCaffery was suspended with pay by the Supreme Court for sending unwanted sexually explicit e-mails and pornographic images to employees at the Attorney General's office, and then trying to coerce another justice into backing him, saying he wasn't "going down alone."
The court didn't suspend McCaffery without pay because the Judicial Conduct Board hasn't filed formal charges, a reason cited in the dissent. The Express Times reports:
Entering a dissenting opinion, Justice Debra McCloskey Todd said, in part: "No independent investigative body has made any findings regarding merits or credibility, and, unlike the suspension of Justice Joan Orie Melvin, no criminal proceedings have been instituted." Orie Melvin and her sister, Janine Orie, were found guilty last year of using court and legislative staffers to help Orie Melvin get elected, a violation of campaign laws.
The conduct board lacks the resources and manpower for the "enormous effort" of the investigation ordered into McCaffery's conduct, [Chief Justice Ronald] Castille wrote.
"The most recent misconduct of Justice McCaffery — forwarding sexually explicit pornographic emails to employees of the Attorney General's Office (and, in one instance, an email depicting a naked 100-year-old woman as the target of a sexually explicit joke and a video of a woman in sexual congress with a snake that is clearly obscene and may violate the Crimes Code Section on Obscenity) — has caused the Supreme Court to be held up to public ridicule," Castille wrote. "This conduct deserves the immediate action as implemented by this court today."
Among the images sent by McCaffery, according to The Times, one of the images showed a woman having sex with a snake that could be illegal.
h/t Irish
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I knew Irish would somehow be involved.
Your lunch time derp
Amanda Marcotte explains why we should pay no attention to the stricter European abortion laws behind the curtain.
"Never mind that American anti-choicers would never settle for capping abortion access at 12 or 14 weeks, as many nations in Europe do, but instead want to ban all abortion and severely restrict access to contraception."
Show me on the doll where the straw man touched you.
She doesn't realize she's arguing against her own position. Most Americans other than the diehard pro-choice team would gladly cap elective abortions at 12 or 14 weeks.
Winning a real debate requires you to understand the opposing view. But if your goal is rile up the people who already agree with you, better just to misrepresent the opposition to make them look outrageous.
This is how a company not wanting to pay for certain pills on its health plan gets turned into "severely" restricting access to contraception.
Hilariously rude Chinese kid & crowd's reaction:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxHrKctATmo
Perhaps it's time for his parents to take him to the zoo so he can pet the bear.
Snakes are illegal now?
It was probably a Mexican snake. Maybe snakes are part of the ISIS strategy for terror in the US of A!
Seriously though, I read the story three times and I'm not 100% sure what Ed means in the first two paragraphs. Is the second paragraph supposed to say that they didn't suspend him *without* pay?
This is what caused the problem. If he had kept his shenanigans quiet, he could have went on being a piece of shit on the public dime and enjoy the professional respect of his legal collegues who likely knew he was a piece of shit, but didn't want to rock the boat or limit future job opportunities.
Pics or it didn't happen.
I remember a Hustler photo shoot from the late 70's entitled Snake Snatch, though there was no penetration.
If you like stories like this, I recommend reading "The Finest Judges Money Can Buy". It was one of my favorite books as a wee laddy.
Top. Men.
h/t Irish
No actors
No dogs
No Irish