David Harsanyi: 'Stop Calling It Marriage Equality'


This week, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected gay marriage appeals from Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin, thus allowing lower courts to legalize same-sex couples. The policy debate is essentially over, and that's great, writes David Harsanyi—just don't say we now have "marriage equality." Consenting, polygamous adults still can't call their unions marriages.
The polygamy argument offends many advocates of same-sex marriage, who view it as an unfair and unnecessary distraction, notes Harsanyi. But on what logical grounds can a person argue that gay marriage is OK but polygamy is not? If your answer is an arbitrary declaration—such as, "The ideal union is between only two individuals"—then all you've done is redefine the parameters of marriage, Harsanyi argues. You support gay marriage, not "marriage equality."
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?