Let's All Stop for a Moment to Consider a President Lindsey Graham


Heads up, potential Republican presidential candidates! Start working on that war-mongering. If you're not hawkish enough, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina will jump in to show you how it's done.
The Weekly Standard got the exclusive in an interview with the senator for a recent magazine piece titled "The Return of the GOP Hawks," subtitled "Not that they ever really left." And since this is The Weekly Standard, the not-very-subtextual unstated second subtitle is "Yaaaaaay!"
Even though Sen. John McCain was trounced in 2008 by a war-weary public, some conservatives, neo or otherwise, seem to think there's new life in the calling for intervention today, intervention tomorrow, and intervention forever. According to The Weekly Standard, McCain told Graham to consider running:
In our interview, Graham repeatedly spoke of the challenges that will face the next president because of the mistakes made under Obama. And he suggested that he might just be the one to fix them.
"If I get through my general election, if nobody steps up in the presidential mix, if nobody's out there talking?—?me and McCain have been talking?—?I may just jump in to get to make these arguments," Graham said.
I asked Graham about [Florida Sen. Marco] Rubio. Hasn't he been making many of the arguments you'd be likely to make? Graham wasn't impressed. "He's a good guy, but after doing immigration with him—we don't need another young guy not quite ready," said Graham. "He's no Obama by any means, but he's so afraid of the right, and I've let that go."
So Graham could run as the next McCain, but without the charisma, or an alternative to Rubio, but without the youthful appeal or energy (or charisma). But who can resist the charms of a presidential candidate who believes that ISIS is coming to kill us all, each and every one of us? Who can better instill the belief in American Exceptionalism than the guy who keeps screaming about monsters under the bed?
Read the full story here. Lindsey Graham coverage and occasional mockery in our Reason archives here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Please God no!
I feel your outrage.
An Ebola outbreak just keeps sounding more and more appealing compared to several alternatives.
My own archives on Lindsey.
You slay me!
I would have rather provided some original content, but I'm tapped out from working late on my erotic memoirs.
To think the world has only been spared those undoubted horrors to date because of your laziness. It's as if a bio-weapons specialist just couldn't get around to working on that new anthrax variant.
Eh, I'll keep on driving...
Considering the present 'anti-war' president, would it make any difference?
I, for one, would like to see the doors of the Temple of Janus closed in my lifetime.
That'll never happen so long as presidents can unilaterally, without check, place the entire nation in a state of war.
I have a question. Since the attacks on ISIS aren't likely legal under American law, what is the status of the U.S. citizens fighting with ISIS? Can't really be enemy combatants if there's no congressional authorization for the conflict, you'd think.
Murderers and accessories before the fact to murder.
Then due, rather than drone, process is required?
Right, but under the laws of Iraq and Syria.
US criminal law has no writ in Tikrit.
I look forward to them being tried under Sharia law.
So what is it, they just like war? They're sadists?
Pres: Graham
VP: Santorum
Sec Def: McCain
Atty Gen: Joe Arpaio
Fugitive: Sevo
Press sec: Sean Hannity
Still need a Sec State.
Hillary!
Are you ready for Hillary?
Peter King
Winner, winner, chicken dinner.
I just threw up in my mouth.
He could be our second closeted gay confirmed bachelor President, after James Buchanan, and just as awful.
Lindsey is a girl's name.
Oh yeah? Why don't you try that little quip on Stacy Keach? Or maybe Leslie Nelsen? Or Sandy Koufax?
You start in on that girl's name stuff and he'll show you good and well he's got man parts.
Let's All Stop for a Moment to Consider a President Lindsey Graham
Let's not.
And what is evidence that Buchanan was gay? He was engaged to Ann
Coleman, she threw him over (and killed herself) because she thought he was fooling around with a friend's sister; Buchanan kept Ann's portrait in his parlor for his entire life.
Lindseygraham, Lindseygraham,
2 feet one and full of hot air,
Opponents beware, opponents beware,
He'll kill the ISIL children but not the Kurdish children,
He'll kill the ISIL children but not the Kurdish children,
He's coming, he's coming, he's coming
I stopped for a moment and considered drop-kicking you right in head just now, Scott, and that is way more interesting than pondering the visceral horror that is your title. I refuse to even read the fucking article today. Not doing it. I refuse.
I predict President Graham would have a lot of very pretty boyish assistants in his White House. If we're still headed to the Imperial Presidency, might as well get ready for a more Roman sexuality as well.
It would a flamboyantly stylish White House.
As flamboyant as my dead aunts house. A lot of flowery prints, pinks, lavender and cheap perfume
Since when did McCain have any charisma?
I said this on the other thread but it bears repeating. You see Rick Santorum and you think he looks like someone who would hit on your teenage daughter. You see Huckabee and you think he looks like someone who would get a little too friendly with your ten year old son at church camp. You see Lindsey Graham and you think he looks like the kind of guy who keeps several well paid pretty boys that look like Kevin Bacon in JFK.
All three creep you out but Graham at least looks like whatever he does he does things that are his own business. So, if Graham runs he is no worse than the third worst Republican candidate.
Ok, I did and now I am going to suffer from PTSD for the rest of my life!
Damned you, Reason!
And now Let's All Stop for a Moment to Consider a President Lindsey Graham Genital Warts.
Yeah, not as bad. The warts, that is.
No.
Fuck no.
Dear God, no.
Were those the reactions you were hoping for, Scott? I have more, if you need them.
"Let's All Stop for a Moment to Consider a President Lindsey Graham"
No.
Wonder what the NSA has on this guy.
The NSA would be his biggest campaign donor.
It would be fun. Every State of the Union would consist entirely of Lindsay standing up and screaming in various directions.
In case anyone was wondering the Spanish version of the He-Man theme is superior, because it has lyrics.
He'll have the closet case vote locked up.
President Lindsey Graham...
Since barfman hasn't been around lately, I'll go ahead and stand in for him: *barf*
Although that may be just the kick in the pants I need to renounce my citizenship and move somewhere else (where I don't know yet).
Don't try Canada.
We're getting Justin Trudeau next year. He makes BHO look mature, serious, poised and thoughtful.
He makes BHO look mature, serious, poised and thoughtful.
I didn't think that was possible.
I'm thinking New Zealand. Gun rights, relatively free market, nice scenery.
DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
Somebody call the repairman. Tonybot's phrase generator is on the fritz.
I heard that an inebriated Bill Kristol took a swing at a sugary cupcake and broke his hand on one of the pink frosty flowers.
Sure, why not? It would end the long-term trend of America electing the worst president ever.
Of course, Graham would end that trend only because it is inconceivable that Americans could possibly elect a worse president. He'd be the end of the line rather than a trend reversal. The trend reversal would occur in 2020.
Seriously, Graham is 100% wrong on everything.
No article on Graham should be allowed that doesn't include the phrase 'ambiguously gay.'
He does kind of look the blonde member of the ambiguously gay duo. And Rick Santorum looks like the brown haired one. Hmmm....
And that's the quote that should kill him.
But it won't. Because, like all political parties, the GOP is heavily infested with leftists--apparently so much so that they're comfortable letting the mask slip.
And how, exactly, would he be worse than Barack? Guarantee there would never be a "Lindsaycare." Of course, we wouldn't need healthcare after he supplied the rebels in Syria with ICBM like he obviously would if president!
"Is this a Republican primary debate or did someone give bad directions to the YMCA sauna?"
--Gwen Ifill
Isn't it still a bit early to start with the Halloween scare stories?
I think the NSA deleted my first comment. Or some Rand Paulite fake libertarian who pretends to like free sppech except when it goes against his libertoprian dreams. Anyway, it was full of wise things. Not as wise as my mentor Craig but still wise. Anyway, from Graham's election a new kind of voter would emerge, a Grahamlican. It would be
white...
closeted...
have yellow teeth...
high pitched...
have a foot fetish...
prefer sativa to indica...
and be born south of the mason dixon line.
I'm not the expert that craig is so he will have to weight in on this and make corrections.
You, sir or madam, have won yourself one internet for the day.