The Ever-Evolving Story of the White House Fence Jumper
More details emerge.

First we were told that a man jumped the White House fence and ran across the lawn. Then came word that the intruder had in fact gotten through the White House doors. Yesterday we found out that he made it surprisingly far into the building, passing the stairs to the first family's living quarters and barreling into the East Room. At this point I half expect to learn tomorrow that the guy actually killed the president.
At any rate, The New York Post reports that the Secret Service has taken steps to prevent future invasions of this nature:
There are already new White House security measures under way, according to presidential press secretary Josh Earnest. He listed them as beefed-up foot patrols, additional surveillance and increased training.
Additionally, the Secret Service has "changed the procedures for ensuring that the entrance to the White House is secure," Earnest said—eventually explaining that meant the front door would be locked.
"After Friday night's incident, when the door is not in use, that will be secure," he explained.
Glad they worked that one out. I suspect there will be further changes too—though just as the one post-9/11 security measure that clearly made sense was the decision to reinforce cockpit doors, I won't be surprised if locking the White House is the one change to come out of this that actually makes people more secure. At any rate, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is holding a hearing on the subject right now; you can watch it here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Does the White House not have the normal set of prox-card readers that everywhere else in the World has?
They were going to put those in but Obama said they'd take jobs away from hard working Secret Service agents.
hard working Secret Service agents.
Hmmm . . .
So he's saying the White House was as poorly secured as the farmhouse I grew up in?
It's less secure than my house. My door locks automatically.
Who jumped the fence and why?
I would expect something similar to the NYSE treatment: no cars allowed within 3 blocks and hundreds of armed soldiers everywhere. And the tourists will love taking selfies with the soldiers.
We should give the soldiers some quirk like the guys at Buckingham Palace.
They beat the everloving shit out of people who annoy them? I think that's the only "quirk" we can expect.
I don't see that going over as well with tourists. Though I wouldn't think getting the silent treatment would be desired either...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJMlyIDCAow
I note that the SS leadership, knowing that they'd shit the bed with the lights on - responded with recommendations to fortify and restict access out another block or two.
I will have a sad when large numbers of these senior agents are fired.
I think you mean when they get a bigger budget.
Seems like locking the doors and having a couple more guys watch the fence would do the job. I'm a bit surprised that the doors to the White House are ever unlocked, or even can be left unlocked.
But of course, the Secret Service will find a way to spend several million to reach that obvious conclusion.
I've got some self-locking doors I could sell you. Only $400,000 each*!
*plus the exclusive maintenance contract for 30 years at $100,000/year
Top. Men.
They should take a page from the Brits. 10 Downing St doesn't have a door knob, it can only be opened from the inside.
The really scary part is that "lock the fucking door" was down at the bottom of their multi-million-dollar security plan.
Honestly, the really scary part, from their perspective, is that the guy even made it to the door. The moment he was over that fence alarms should have been going off all over the place, and within seconds there should have been a ton of agents confronting him. The issue is that they failed to respond quickly enough, which means their own procedures must have broken down.
Security is supposed to be layered. It's no big deal if someone gets over the fence; it's just a fence. You can't have a thousand USSS agents standing at parade-rest around the entire perimeter of the White House grounds. Had he been properly armed and trained, a ton of agents rushing in to confront him would have simply resulted in a ton of dead agents. Two or three simultaneous perimeter breaches could overwhelm the agents on the ground and the snipers on the roof as there simply are not enough resources to cover multiple targets over a large area. Your last line of defense is inside the building. The windows are bullet-resistant, there's big fucking doors with big fucking locks, and there are safe-rooms into which the principals can retreat while the intruder is trying to breach the locked doors. If the doors aren't locked, the intruder can walk in and do his business before anyone has time to retreat to the safe-rooms or organize a defense. Locks: It's Security 101- Chapter 1, before million-dollar surveillance systems, armed guards, and seismic sensors.
Yeah, fair enough. I'm not saying that the doors shouldn't be secured. But this was just a single intruder. It's embarrassing that he wasn't intercepted.
You can't have a thousand USSS agents standing at parade-rest around the entire perimeter of the White House grounds.
Why not? Think of the jobs, man!
Seriously. This whole thing makes me think of the Seinfeld episode. Security's not worth much if you don't lock the fuckin door.
Hey, I've got an idea. How about we reduce the power of the fed govt, and the pres especially, (or better get rid of it) to where nobody gives a shit about this man and therefore he won't be in danger.
Hey, a guy can dream, right?
There are already new White House security measures under way, according to presidential press secretary Josh Earnest. He listed them as beefed-up foot patrols, additional surveillance and increased training.
Claymores on the lawn and a sniper on the roof.
I like the way taking people out of service for training increases security.
Like the English and Irish country houses it was modeled on, the White House was, from the start, open to the public until the early part of the 20th century. President Thomas Jefferson held an open house for his second inaugural in 1805, and many of the people at his swearing-in ceremony at the Capitol followed him home, where he greeted them in the Blue Room. Those open houses sometimes became rowdy: in 1829, President Andrew Jackson had to leave for a hotel when roughly 20,000 citizens celebrated his inauguration inside the White House. His aides ultimately had to lure the mob outside with washtubs filled with a potent cocktail of orange juice and whiskey. Even so, the practice continued until 1885, when newly elected Grover Cleveland arranged for a presidential review of the troops from a grandstand in front of the White House instead of the traditional open house. Jefferson also permitted public tours of his house, which have continued ever since, except during wartime, and began the tradition of annual receptions on New Year's Day and on the Fourth of July. Those receptions ended in the early 1930s, although President Bill Clinton would briefly revive the New Year's Day open house in his first term.
The White House remained accessible in other ways; President Abraham Lincoln complained[citation needed] that he was constantly beleaguered by job seekers waiting to ask him for political appointments or other favors, or eccentric dispensers of advice like "General" Daniel Pratt, as he began the business day. Lincoln put up with the annoyance rather than risk alienating some associate or friend of a powerful politician or opinion maker.
Fuck those lickspittle tin pot dictators that infest that great house these days.
Gore Vidal had fun with all those officer-seekers crowding the White House when he wrote Lincoln. Made them a recurring background detail.
One difference with the Jacksonian era is that when someone tried to kill him, President Jackson smacked the guy around with his cane.
http://www.politico.com/news/s...../8184.html
I like the way nobody is mentioning the "fact" (I guess, who knows what you can trust) that the trespasser overpowered a female SS agent. Mustn't mention that, in a physical confrontation, women are at a serious disadvantage unless they use a gun.
I half expect to learn tomorrow that the guy actually killed (or locked in the closet) and replaced the president.
Something like this:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-qdMD.....d+Wolf.jpg
You'd think that here, at least, the Pres would take action against incompetent govt employees. I mean, it's one thing to mess with veterans' health care, but the SS failed in their basic job or protecting the Pres himself!
Their job is to prevent this country from becoming banana republic-y, with a new President every other day.
The Secret Service gets to the bottom of the problem: They need more money.
http://twitchy.com/2014/09/30/.....gn=twitter
As I've said elsewhere, this guy got a bright future as a running back in NFL when he gets out of jail. He's already proved that he can jump, run and avoid tackles with armed guards around.
It's good to see the security of the White House receives the same level of meticulous detail as is being paid to the southern US border.
Hope ISIS isn't taking notes.