Massachusetts

Reminder to Mass. Voters: Martha Coakley Is the Worst

|

She has no regrets. Will Mass. voters say the same?
Credit: Office of Governor Patrick

The woman so terrible that she managed to hand Ted Kennedy's Senate seat temporarily over to Republicans is back and has landed the Democratic nomination for governor of Massachusetts. Attorney General Martha Coakley lost a special Senate race in 2010 to Republican Scott Brown, who warmed the chair for a couple of years until Elizabeth Warren snagged it back for team blue.

Coakley will be facing Republican Charlie Baker for governor, and according to the Boston Globe she already underperformed in the primary Tuesday, winning in a closer margin than expected (she pulled 42 percent against two candidates who received 36 and 21 percent, respectively). According to the Globe, Coakley intends to portray Baker as a plutocrat (he's a venture capital executive) while he focuses on ending the Democratic stranglehold on state government.

The current Globe story doesn't talk much about Coakley's background or how awful her campaign was in 2010, but Reason did. Former Reason Editor Michael C. Moynihan (now at The Daily Beast and sometimes on The Independents) picked apart her lackluster campaign, but more importantly, detailed her awful behavior as a prosecutor and her apparent lack of regret for putting innocent people in prison using discredited evidence:

As the head of a child abuse and sex crimes unit and later as district attorney, Martha Coakley was a strong proponent of using discredited techniques of "recovering memory" of past child abuse.

As a result, innocent men like Gerald Amirault, a former daycare operator who, along with his mother and sister, was accused of molesting children in his care, was released a long 18 years after his conviction. Wall Street Journal writer Dorthy Rabinowitz, who won a Pulitzer Prize for her reporting on the Amirault case, wrote that after coaching by therapists, "Mrs. Amirault was accused of raping a child with a magic wand, of assaulting another sexually with a large butcher knife, Gerald of abusing children in a magic room while dressed as a clown, and Cheryl of similar unspeakable violations." After the case collapsed, and long after the family had been convicted, Coakley personally lobbied then-Governor Jane Swift to block Gerald Amirault's release.

While the Amirault case has received the most coverage, there's also the case of Ray and Shirley Souza, who were accused of molesting both their children and grandchildren. As with the Amarault case, no credible physical evidence existed of sexual assault—but that didn't stand in the way of the hyper-ambitious Coakley. "What we have are 6- and 7-year-old female children testifying credibly about incidents in the recent past." Those credible incidents included being forced to drink a "green potion" before being inappropriately touched, being molested by a giant robot, and Ray Souza putting his head in his granddaughter's vagina and "wiggling" it around.

The Amiraults and Souzas were railroaded; their lives were ruined. Coakley, always forthright about her political ambitions (in 2004, she announced that she would seek Sen. John Kerry's seat if he won the presidency), stands by her overzealous prosecutions and defends the convictions. When asked about the bizarre and incredible tales "recovered" by the Souza grandchildren, Coakley offered this curious defense of the prosecutions: "Kids cannot fabricate a comprehensive lie about putting their fingers in their grandmother's vagina and say it feels slimy and tell that to an interviewer and say it in court again six months later."

Read more here. And here she is getting slapped down by the courts after helping draft a completely unconstitutional law to try to censor adult content on the Internet. And here she is defending officials in Boston freaking out over blinking signs promoting cartoon show Aqua Teen Hunger Force and thinking that they're bombs because they were electronic and had wires.

NEXT: Obama's B.S. Justification for His Illegal War: the 2001 AUMF

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. But, it was for the CHILDREN!

  2. Coakley? Koch brothers? Coincidence I think not.

    1. I think it is coincidence.

  3. There’s always room for more craven and venal incompetence, at the expense of other people, to boot.

    Now, can we nuke Massholechusetts?

    1. really, if you can just contain to about a 15-mile radius around Boston, you’ll get the results you want and the rest of us will be just fine.

      1. well, that’s assuming Auric’s at work and tarran – actually tarran is pretty fucked. Sorry.

  4. Mrs. Amirault was accused of raping a child with a magic wand, of assaulting another sexually with a large butcher knife, Gerald of abusing children in a magic room while dressed as a clown, and Cheryl of similar unspeakable violations.

    This sounds like one of Sugar Free’s depleted blood sugar fever dreams.

    1. My question is if the first two were mentioned doing literally the most depraving and mentally scarring things I could ever come up with, what the fuck did Cheryl do that was so bad it didn’t get an explanation?

      1. “What we have are 6- and 7-year-old female children testifying credibly about incidents in the recent past.” Those credible incidents included being forced to drink a “green potion” before being inappropriately touched, being molested by a giant robot, and Ray Souza putting his head in his granddaughter’s vagina and “wiggling” it around.”

        WTF? I am never going to Massachusetts. Who could come up with that story?

        1. The real question is what kind of jury could believe it.

          1. Massholes.

    2. There no proof any longer that I ghost-wrote any of that.

  5. I thought Nikki was the worst?

    1. Coakley is on a completely different scale of worst.

    2. Have you ever actually seen Nikki and Coakley in the same room?

  6. BUT SHE’S THE AG AND IT’S HER TURN.

  7. A shallow grave is worse than no grave.

  8. No reminder needed. It’s gonna be a great couple of months up here.

  9. “Martha Coakley Is the Worst”

    Pelosi, Reid, Obo, Boxer, Fauxcahontas, Warren; you mean this woman is worse than that?

    1. Yes. She is objectively evil. She just hasn’t had access to the kind of power or notoriety of national office that those others have.

  10. For these prosecutors, nothing is off the table to preserve a conviction once issued. They even gave Cheryl Amirault freedom from prison on the condition that she would not contest the charges against her any more. So either she was guilty and they let her go, or she was innocent and they don’t want it to come out.

    Bastards. There is no hell hot enough.

  11. You forgot her vicious prosecution of Tim Cahill, former State Treasurer.

    Cahill’s independent run drain off enough Republican votes to get Duval re-elected. Coakley rewarded him with an indictment for putting his face on lottery ads – she and Duval did similar ads.

    She eventually gave up after a mistrial. Howie Carr loves to makes fun of her.
    http://howiecarrshow.com/marth…..in-action/

  12. The best comment about her disastrous 2010 campaign: “It wasn’t the Hindenburg or the Titanic, it was the Hindenburg crashing into the Titanic.”

  13. If I were one of the Amiraults, I think Coakley better have a 24/7 eye on me as I got closer to my mortal end.

    1. If I were one of the Amiraults, I’d make a campaign commercial for her opponent.

  14. Senate race in 2010 to Republican Scott Brown, who warmed the chair for a couple of years until Elizabeth Warren snagged it back for team blue.

    Are you saying that Warren is better than this woman?

    1. “Martha Coakley Is the Worst”: Yes.

  15. I hadn’t known that this woman was responsible for the Amirault trials. I’m surprised that that fact didn’t get more attention during her run for the Senate (maybe it did in Massachusetts and we just didn’t see it outside of the state). She is objectively evil, and should be in prison, not running for high office.

    1. objectively evil, and should be in prison, not running for high office.

      I contend that this is true of most politicians.

  16. “What we have are 6- and 7-year-old female children testifying credibly about incidents in the recent past.” Those credible incidents included being forced to drink a “green potion” before being inappropriately touched, being molested by a giant robot, and Ray Souza putting his head in his granddaughter’s vagina and “wiggling” it around.

    His head??

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.