"Airbnb of Education" Funds Keggers Across America


Selling lecture notes for beer money keeps getting easier. According to The Boston Globe, publishing company Cengage Learning has partnered with Flashnotes to create the "Airbnb of education," an online bazaar for college students to buy and sell class notes, study guides, video tutorials, and other educational materials.

While this sounds like great news for frat boy slackers and high achievers alike, the commoditization of college study has raised some concerns about "blurring the line between collaborating and cheating," particularly in light of the Harvard cheating scandal back in 2012. Cengage, however, plans to address the concerns of university professors and administrators about cheating and other academic tomfoolery:

The exchange will be included in an existing online portal, MindTap…that Cengage offers to college professors for posting supplemental learning tools…Professors using MindTap will be able to activate or disable the function that lets students swap study help for money.

Flashnotes, which has been operating an online marketplace for study materials for several years now, also has a strict policy banning the "sale of test answers, essays, or homework, and uses a keyword screening algorithm to flag content that could be considered cheating." In addition, users can report ethics violations.

Yet for all its supposed problems, the online marketplace offers a rewarding opportunity for diligent students to benefit materially as well as intellectually from their hard work. One student from Northeastern "pocketed between $400 and $500 last spring semester by selling study guides on Flashnotes." A former Florida State University student has earned almost $12,000 selling his materials. That's a lot of kegs.

Some, like Craig R. Vasey of the American Association of University Professors, worry that the buying and selling of lecture notes is "at odds with the spirit of higher education." But Vasey's skepticism betrays a distaste for monetary exchange more than it does a worry about the philosophical underpinnings of the university, considering the prohibitive expense of official educational resources such as college textbooks—not to mention the exorbitantly high price of participating in the "spirit of higher education" in the first place.

And, as The Boston Globe is quick to point out, students have been swapping and selling lecture notes long before Flashnotes and Cengage came along. For every lazy student there is an entrepreneurial high achiever ready to make some cash. The online marketplace merely connects buyers with sellers and facilitates exchange between the two—an exchange that would occur offline anyway.


NEXT: Ferguson City Council Under Pressure to Reform

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. And this my friends is why we roll with the punches.

  2. Teachers Pay Teachers is an outrage! Education is about people, not profits, and its objective is form good citizens. Teachers should not be referring to materials produced by capitalist exploiters unless they are approved by educrats and paying appropriate kickbacks to politicians. Otherwise teachers may actually teach their charges to think, and that might cause students to become bad citizens who question authority.

  3. “blurring the line between collaborating and cheating,”

    See – the problem here is these people don’t understand the difference between ‘learning a subject’ and ‘doing the work assigned’. Colleges have strong incentive to conflate the two – a good chunk of what a college offers is classroom-centric.

    But when you get into areas where I don’t *need* a classroom, where the college simply becomes an ‘accreditation agency’ instead of an ‘educational facility’ then a huge chunk of college’s prestige and power is simply *gone*.

    This worries these people because these students are taking charge of their own education in a way that disempowers the school – they are learning the subject and simply showing up to take tests/turn in papers top demonstrate to the accreditor that they meet a minimum level of competence in the subject.

  4. How long will it take for the school district that employs Diana Jones to claim that her work product belongs to the school district and not her?

    Seriously, her school district ought to sue her for stealing their intellectual property.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.