Anarchy in Kurdistan?
Murray Bookchin's new fans

The Kurdistan Workers' Party, or PKK, has been active in the Kurdish parts of Turkey since the '70s. It has a sometimes sordid history: Its politics were Marxist-Leninist, and its willingness to kill prisoners and civilians earned a rebuke from Amnesty International. Its leader, Abdullah Öcalan, has been under arrest since 1999, but its armed struggle with the Turkish state continued until a ceasefire was reached last year.
I was vaguely aware of all that, and I may even have read at some point that Öcalan had recently rejected his old Leninist outlook and terrorist tactics, proclaiming a newfound devotion to democracy. What I did not realize was what brand of democracy had attracted Öcalan's interest. Somehow, he became smitten with the American left-anarchist Murray Bookchin. He appears to be particularly interested in Bookchin's idea of devolving power to cities governed by neighborhood assemblies.
I just called Bookchin an anarchist, but by the time he died Bookchin had rejected that label, calling himself a "Communalist" instead. But I'm not writing this post to discuss Bookchin's ideas—the curious reader can check out my obit for him here and Reason's interview with him here—so much as just to express my astonishment to see Bookchinism bubbling up in the PKK, of all places.
ROAR has more on Öcalan's evolution here. Bookchin's partner Janet Biehl discusses these developments here. Some left-anarchists greet the PKK's conversion with a mixture of interest and skepticism here. Kevin Carson is enthusiastic here. The most blistering critique of Bookchin ever written is here. A latebreaking correction to my Bookchin obit is here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ah, so they moved from an asshole version of statism where TOP MEN bludgeon people for equality and the greater good, to an asshole version of anarchy where MOB MEN bludgeon people for equality and the greater good. Fantastic.
That said, if you have to be an anarcho-socialist you could do worse than Bookchin.
I think it's funny how anarcho-syndalicalists/socialists/communists think that massive compulsory redistribution by a state (by some other name), somehow is not statism.
anarcho-syndicalism and anarcho-communism aren't compulsory anything by a state, and a rejection of a capitalist standard of property doesn't require a state, anymore than a rejection of usufructory rights does. Neither standard can be logically deduced from self-ownership so the functioning of any society with either standard requires some consensus on the enforcement mechanism to be used. If this enforcement mechanism is a state to you, well, I got news for you...
Yes, decentralized statism is still better than centralized statism.
Nonetheless decentralized statists (and that's not what they are) don't really have any basis to bill themselves as 'anarchist'.
Nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.
A Kurdish guy in a Turkish prison was a Marxist but is now some kind of leftist community organizer? If he can produce an American birth certificate I think we have found the next Democrat Presidential nominee.
He can wait his damn turn.
8 long miserable years of Fauxcahauntus must come first.
We should hope and pray that Cherokee genius gets the nomination.
Paging tarran, paging tarran. Tarran to the white courtesy phone, please.
Have any insight to share on the PKK, have they changed?
No, I have no insight.
The relatives who used to give me the skinny have largely passed away so all I know is what I read on the highly reliable Internet.
When I last paid attention, a few years ago, the PKK were still killing anyone who looked funny to them. They might have turned over a new leaf and stopped being bloodthirsty Stalinists for all I know.
Drat - thanks for answering tho'.
devolving power to cities governed by neighborhood assemblies.
Sounds like a comfy fit for clan/tribal based societies, to me. Probably pretty much the way the "ungovernable" hinterlands of Pakistan, Iraq, Turkey, etc. are run anyway.
We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. But all the decision of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting.
By a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more....
Yes, yes I see!
Kudos for publishing this brief article about one of the world's most important current left-libertarian movements. Too bad readers aren't more interested in traditional anarchism than their comments reveal.
Worth pointing out the influence of the Zapatistas on the PKK, who had earlier had a similar ideological evolution.
Also worth pointing out the role of PKK-associated forces rescuing Yazidis from the Islamic State forces.
I've been posting a lot about the PKK and its affiliates in my Facebook group SMYGO.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/617024874990524/