Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

A.M. Links: More U.S. Troops Headed to Iraq, Putin Says Russian Troops Could Get to Kiev in Two Weeks, Neanderthal Abstract Art Found in Gibraltar

Ed Krayewski | 9.3.2014 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Stewart Finlayson/Gibraltar Museum
(Stewart Finlayson/Gibraltar Museum)
  • Neanderthal abstract art
    Stewart Finlayson/Gibraltar Museum

    Hawks on both sides of the aisle in Congress want the president to act after the Islamic State (ISIL) posted a video showing the beheading of a second American journalist. The terror group-cum-proto-government says the beheading was in response to U.S. air strikes in northern Iraq. The prime minister of the United Kingdom, David Cameron, met with the Cobra committee discuss the U.K.'s response to a threat by ISIL to behead a British hostage. The U.S. is sending 350 more U.S. troops to its embassy in Baghdad.

  • President Obama arrived in Tallinn, Estonia ahead of a NATO summit in Wales to reassure NATO members in the region that Russian aggression in Ukraine did not mean the same would be tolerated against them. Vladimir Putin, meanwhile, says Russian troops could get to Kiev in two weeks. The president of Ukraine announced a ceasefire shortly thereafter.
  • Two men in North Carolina who have been in prison for 30 years after being found guilty of the murder and rape of an 11-year-old girl had their convictions overturned  by a judge after the DNA of another man was uncovered as evidence.
  • The tech company Apple denies its systems were breached in the theft of nude photo from multiple celebrities leaked this week.
  • Researchers believe they've found abstract art created by Neanderthals in a cave in Gibraltar.
  • Former Survivor lead singer Jami Jamison died of a heart attack, aged 63.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Nick Gillespie and Emily Ekins: Millennials Are Politically Unclaimed

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (413)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    The U.S. is sending 350 more U.S. troops to its embassy in Baghdad.

    So post all the Youtube Mohammed movies you want.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Hello.

      "I sent ree hundrid fiddy men!"

      "President Obama arrived in Tallinn, Estonia ahead of a NATO summit in Wales to reassure NATO members..."

      I'm sure they're all reassured.

      1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

        "President Obama arrived in Tallinn, Estonia ahead of a NATO summit in Wales to reassure NATO members..."

        Talk about painting the bulls-eye on the next target.

      2. robc   11 years ago

        President Obama arrived in Tallinn, Estonia ahead of a NATO summit in Wales to reassure NATO members...

        I think he made a wrong turn in Albuquerque. How does swinging by Estonia make any sense?

        1. Metazoan   11 years ago

          I guess it makes sense because Estonia is a NATO member that Russia enjoys harassing?

        2. PD Scott   11 years ago

          How does swinging by Estonia make any sense?

          Hmm.

          1. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

            I like my Hmm better.

          2. Restoras   11 years ago

            Maybe Poland doesn't have any more use for empty promises of alliance and protection?

        3. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

          It was on Reggie Love's bucket list.

      3. Doctor Whom   11 years ago

        Ohayou gozaimasu.

        Stop, or we'll shout, "Stop!" more loudly.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Former Survivor lead singer Jami Jamison died of a heart attack, aged 63.

    His band's name let him down one last time.

    1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

      Now I'm going to have Eye of the Tiger stuck in my head all day. Fuck.

      1. Jordan   11 years ago

        What about the Baywatch theme?

      2. Ted S.   11 years ago

        Jamison wasn't the vocalist on "Eye of the Tiger" -- he only joined Survivor in 1984.

        So you can have this stuck in your head instead.

        1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

          *barf*

          1. Ted S.   11 years ago

            I didn't say it was any good, just that it would be stuck in your head. :-p

            1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

              Well, you failed. I didn't listen to enough of it to remember it. Ha ha.

        2. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

          I didn't even need to click that to know it sucks

    2. Idle Hands   11 years ago

      I guess you could say he was just a man without the will to survive?

    3. Knarf Yenrab!   11 years ago

      Sad day. I have a vestigial affection for mid-80s "rock" bands, particularly those with lead singers who kept trying to hit the high notes two decades after they lost it. Speaking of which, I wonder what Steve Perry is up to these days.

      1. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

        I heard some recent recordings of him on "O and A" a few months ago, trying to sing some Journey songs.

        He couldn't hit any notes, let alone the high ones.

  3. Bam!   11 years ago

    President Obama arrived in Tallinn, Estonia ahead of a NATO summit in Wales to reassure NATO members in the region that Russian aggression in Ukraine did not mean the same would be tolerated against them.

    I didn't know they had golf courses in Estonia.

  4. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    60 of History's Strangest Royal Epithets

    Some figures from history lead such remarkable (or notorious) lives that they earn themselves an epithet that remains in use long after their death. More often than not these nicknames are used either to encapsulate a leader's personality or appearance, or else to sum up the events or legacy of their time in power?but either way, there's no guarantee it will be complimentary. In fact for every Catherine the Great there's an Ivan the Terrible. For every William the Conqueror there's a Vlad the Impaler. And for every Richard the Lionheart there's an Albert the Peculiar. Sixty of the most bizarre?and in some cases the most unflattering?epithets from history are listed here.

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      How many pages does it run to?

      1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

        3523 pages, each requiring a different flash plug-in.

      2. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

        Single page!

        BOLKO THE STRICT - why am I not surprised it is a German.

        1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

          If Germans didn't exist, we would have to make them up.

          1. Restoras   11 years ago

            Romulans?

    2. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      Before I click, they had better have Ethelred the Unready on that list.

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        It does not.

        1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

          BOOOO!!!!!

    3. Bones   11 years ago

      Obama the Mulligan?

      1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

        *polite applause*

      2. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

        Obama the Teleprompter-in-Chief?

    4. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

      15. BURMUDO THE GOUTY, King of L?on from 984-999, suffered from such a bad case of gout towards the end of his life that he couldn't ride his horse and had to be carried everywhere by his courtiers

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        I don't have courtiers; I have orphan laborers to carry me everywhere.

    5. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      Halfdan the Bad Entertainer? I caught his act at the Comedy Club. The Independents had him as a guest once.

      1. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

        His son was quarterdan the unfunny.

  5. Bee Tagger   11 years ago

    Researchers believe they've found abstract art created by Neanderthals...

    Come on, if you don't have anything nice to say.

    1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      Another one of Pro L's secret lairs is discovered!

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        My Neanderthal heart thirsts for revenge. Or would if hearts drank stuff and revenge were a liquid.

        1. Citizen Nothing   11 years ago

          Did you steal that from Homer Simpson?

          1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

            Did he say that? I thought I just made it up.

          2. Restoras   11 years ago

            That's more Sterling Archer than Homer Simpson. Definitely not Peter Griffin.

            1. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

              So we're just done with phrasing, right, that's not a thing anymore?

              1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                PHRASING, MOTHER!!!

    2. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      "This painting represent Thog commentary on ennui of modern society. Thog not believe in representational art, Thog have broader vision.

      "And this represent mastodon Thog kill last week."

  6. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Vladimir Putin, meanwhile, says Russian troops could get to Kiev in two weeks.

    Getting there isn't always the hard part.

    1. DJF   11 years ago

      Nothing to worry about, just undocumented immigrants trying to improve their lives.

    2. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      Considering how poorly the Russian Army did in Grozny, I am not sure they would want to go to Kiev.

    3. BigT   11 years ago

      Vladimir Putin, meanwhile, says Russian troops could get to Kiev in two weeks...

      ...seeking asylum.

  7. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    Rape victim, 24, is told he owes $15,000 child support for daughter he did not know he had fathered when he was 14-years-old

    Nick Olivas owes $15,000 in child support to his 6-year-old daughter
    Two years ago, the state served Olivas with paperwork saying that he owed money to his six-year-old daughter and he didn't know he was a father
    Nick Olivas, now 24, didn't know that statutory rape existed when he was a teenager and therefore he didn't press charges against the 20-year-old
    The director of the national Center for Men told the Arizona Republic that Nick Olivas is suffering because of his gender
    Olivas wants to fight his case in court but unfortunately, he cannot pay for a lawyer

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....-male.html

    1. Jordan   11 years ago

      Male privilege?

    2. Idle Hands   11 years ago

      This is so absurd, I feel bad for laughing.

    3. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      Wait, those numbers don't add up.

      Now 24, incident happened at 14, how is the kid only six? shouldn't they be 9 or 10?

      1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

        I noticed that as well.

      2. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

        The DM is just sloppy it seems:

        "Two years ago, the state served Olivas with paperwork saying that he owed money to his six-year-old daughter."

        So yes, it appears she is now 8.

        1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

          Although, fuck, I can't do math either.

      3. Ted S.   11 years ago

        Damn your quick fingers! 😉

      4. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

        Now 24, incident happened at 14, how is the kid only six? shouldn't they be 9 or 10?

        New math.

        1. gimmeasammich   11 years ago

          +1 Tom Lehrer

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIWaJ0sy03g

      5. Brian D   11 years ago

        Guy was notified two years ago that he had a six-year old daughter. Take away another nine months for pregnancy and you're pretty close.

    4. Drax the Destroyer   11 years ago

      That's some award-winning, grade A, steel-cut, organic bullshit.

    5. Ted S.   11 years ago

      The numbers don't quite add up, though.

    6. lap83   11 years ago

      "Nick Olivas, now 24, didn't know that statutory rape existed when he was a teenager and therefore he didn't press charges against the 20-year-old"

      It sounds like it was consensual and he probably wouldn't have pressed charges anyway.

      1. jmomls   11 years ago

        I thought underage kids couldn't make decisions regarding this sort of thing, so charges were automatic, in other words.

    7. thom   11 years ago

      What is this with the government just up and deciding somebody owes them money and then telling them after the fact? Shouldn't people at least have a chance to dispute these things?

      1. Almanian!   11 years ago

        Nope, it says right there in the Constitution, "guilty till you ALLEGEDLY prove your innocence - pay up, suckah!"

        1. thom   11 years ago

          I'm especially irritated because the State of Maryland sent me a collection letter yesterday claiming I owe them $388 for something involving my car registration. Fuck you Maryland, I don't live in your stupid state anymore and my car isn't registered there.

          But, at the end of the day those fuckers have my SSN and I like having good credit, so I'm going to pay up...

  8. Bee Tagger   11 years ago

    Vladimir Putin, meanwhile, says Russian troops could get to Kiev in two weeks

    A discussion among Eastern Europeans about the best route to take should reduce tensions.

    1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      Putin needz moar GPSz?

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        Yeah, apparently, he went to Kiev by way of Berlin.

  9. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    Columbia student pledges to carry mattress with her everywhere she goes for as long as her alleged rapist remains on campus

    Emma Sulkhowitz was raped nearly two years ago, when she was a sophomore at Columbia University
    She reported her rapist, a fellow student, to police and the university but so far charges have not been filed and he remains on campus
    Now a senior, Sulkhowitz is performing an art project for her thesis in which she will carry around a mattress every day her attacker remains at school

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....ampus.html
    But I thought alleged rapists were guilty until proven innocent, and even then they were unfairly expelled. What happened to the narrative?

    1. WTF   11 years ago

      But I thought alleged rapists were guilty until proven innocent, and even then they were unfairly expelled. What happened to the narrative?

      Maybe the rash of Title IX law suits by accused men is starting to make the colleges a little more cautious about acting without evidence?

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        I thought it was cases like this that were causing the feds to use Title IX more harshly against the schools, and demand that they get rid of due process for rape cases.

        1. WTF   11 years ago

          The feds are using Title IX as a fig leaf justification to 'convict' alleged male rapists without evidence. Enterprising lawyers are using Title IX as a basis to sue on behalf of their male clients since as men they are being treated unequally in such cases in violation of the terms of Title IX.

      2. mr lizard   11 years ago

        Ya something about officially labeling someone as a rapist without compelling evidence seems to bring rapid financial feedback.

  10. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    The pirouetting Palace guardsman: Soldier captured on video showing off his dance moves to delighted tourists (but top brass aren't so impressed)

    Grenadier Guard filmed busting moves while guarding Buckingham Palace
    Military sources have said the soldier can expect disciplinary action

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....essed.html

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      They are supposed to be statues - are they going to have to replace them with robots?

      1. pan fried wylie   11 years ago

        Or save a bunch of that robot money and use actual statues.

      2. Bardas Phocas   11 years ago

        Those hats won't look very good on an ED-209.
        http://www.omnicorp.com/products/ed-209.php
        And it's all about the hats.

        1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

          I prefer the older Omni Consumer Products ED-209.

      3. sarcasmic   11 years ago

        They are supposed to be statues

        Yes and no. Those guns are loaded, and they are fully justified in using them if threatened.

    2. jmomls   11 years ago

      Obviously these cats are too busy practicing their dance moves to actually learn how to defend themselves from getting their heads sawed off on their own streets.

  11. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Meet the new exoskeleton the Navy is testing to make sailors stronger

    The U.S. military has been dabbling for years in how it can make troops stronger, faster and safer in combat. There is no better example of that than U.S. Special Operations Command's push to develop a high-tech armored exoskeleton reminiscent of "Iron Man," the comic book hero brought to life on the silver screen over the last decade by Robert Downey Jr.

    The military isn't just researching exoskeletons for the military's most hair-raising missions, though. As a research project now underway in the U.S. Navy illustrates, military officials are considering ways they could help troops carry out more mundane skills ranging from moving boxes to welding pipes on ships.

    1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      Listen, and understand. That stevedore is out there. It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until your ship is unloaded.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

        +1 Ripley

        1. Steve G   11 years ago

          More like +1 Reese. Sheesh!

          1. Restoras   11 years ago

            +1 Ripeese/Reepley

          2. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

            I think not

          3. Almanian!   11 years ago

            I'm with Scruffy on this one - Ripley in one of the later Alien movies with the exoskeleton thing

            1. Steve G   11 years ago

              Draw. The quote is Terminator, the loader is Alien.

              1. Steve G   11 years ago

                Aliens...to be precise

            2. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

              And Hicks was Reese, just to confuse things.

    2. Idle Hands   11 years ago

      So basically they just watched Aliens last weekend.

    3. BigT   11 years ago

      Shouldn't the Navy be developing better water wings?

  12. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    ...to reassure NATO members in the region that Russian aggression in Ukraine did not mean the same would be tolerated against them.

    "My ineffectual foreign policy means that."

  13. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Friends Don't Look Friends' Private Nude Pictures.

    If you knew Kate Upton personally? you wouldn't look at the pictures that were copied from her private account, showing her nude, right? The pictures hacked off her phone are a violation of her privacy, and while you may not be a criminal for looking at them ? although some people want it to be a crime ? looking at someone else's private photographs that were not meant for your eyes is not a nice thing to do.

    Oh, you might be tempted? but you wouldn't. You wouldn't, because Kate Upton is your friend in this imaginary scenario, and that would be a terrible thing to do to a friend. Also, the world really doesn't have a shortage of pictures of Kate Upton almost nude ? say, the July 2012 cover of GQ ? and she didn't have any problem with anyone looking at any of those.

    bullshit...

    1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

      How much shit do you think Verlander is getting in that locker room?

      1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

        Shit? Maybe jealous quips at best.

        1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

          Well he did have a couple pictures surface of his ass.

          1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

            And his uh, other side.

            1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

              He's sensitive? Don't tell the Athletics that.

            2. Ted S.   11 years ago

              And people are surprised he's got a penis?

    2. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      Well, not the ugly friends' pics...

    3. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Nobody's ever upened u the medicine cabinet in a friend's bathroom either, I suppose.

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        Er, "opened up". And i had this (should be safe for work) in mind.

        1. robc   11 years ago

          Having a party?

          Fill your medicine cabinet with ping pong balls.

          1. robc   11 years ago

            Or, for maximum humor value, a poisonous snake.

    4. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

      What about attractive coworkers?

      1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

        Well I think that is okay.

        1. DJF   11 years ago

          I immagine everyone at Reason morning links to be naked. Does this make me a bad person?

          1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

            no but probably a gay one.

            1. DJF   11 years ago

              I can just immagine they are all women. Or at least men trapped in womens bodies.

              1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

                There are no libertarian women.

                1. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

                  But there are lots of libertarian men pretending to be women on other web sites?

          2. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

            But I am naked. So you imagine me naked-naked?

            1. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

              But I am naked. So you imagine me naked-naked?

              People are like grapes, they both look funny without the skin on; or so says my daughter.

              1. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

                So... future serial killer?

    5. SugarFree   11 years ago

      If we were truly friends, she would have let me see her boobs already.

      1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

        Funny that never worked for me, every girl who said we were friends refused to show me her boobies, with the exception of a few.

        1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

          Although I may have just proved your point. I will continue to collate the data.

    6. Steve G   11 years ago

      I just love all this self-righteous outrage. These douchebags don't utter a peep if baby or wedding pics are snagged and release by aggressive paparazzi, but NOODS!!1! are fundamentally different. STFU

    7. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

      NOBODY is that good a friend, that they wouldn't look at Kate's boobies, given the chance.

  14. Jensen   11 years ago

    Researchers believe they've found abstract art created by Neanderthals...

    "Grog don't get it. Should have never sent Mog to Cave Grad School, why Grog listen to Concubine One, Two and Four?"

  15. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    When journalism is too good to be true

    Vanity Fair assigned the story to one of its best writers, the award-winning William Langewiesche. The piece he produced was extraordinarily sympathetic to the lawsuit, so much so that Donziger himself proclaimed it "the kind of paradigm-shifting, breakthrough article that I think is going to change the entire case from here until it ends in a way that is favorable to us."

    And no wonder! The emails between Donziger and Langewiesche in early 2007, as the story was being prepared, show Langewiesche as Donziger's camp follower at the best of times, his sock-puppet at the worst.

    The reporter asks Donziger to prepare lists of dozens of questions to be asked of Chevron. And he begs Donziger to help him prepare arguments about why there's no need for him to do face-to-face interviews with Chevron officials, as they've requested, even though he spent days meeting with Donziger and his legal staff.

    1. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

      Wow. This is epic corruption on the part of Vanity Fair and the writer.

      Chevron ought to name them as conspirators to subvert justice.

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        The sad thing is that there will be a lot of people who will claim the two writers are the victims in all of this. 🙁

    2. Ted S.   11 years ago

      +1 Janet Cooke

  16. hamilton   11 years ago

    The prime minister of the United Kingdom, David Cameron, met with the Cobra committee discuss the U.K.'s response to a threat by ISIL to behead a British hostage.

    While I feel very much for the families of these poor captives, what ever happened to the "We don't negotiate with terrorists" thingy?

    I was under the impression that, by not dignifying such actions with a response of any form, we sought to discourage them in the main. Acknowledging the act would seem to make any subsequent action, be it submission or return force, a lose-lose. Did someone hack into WOPR again?

    1. Drax the Destroyer   11 years ago

      Wait...so Cameron is having discussions with the known enemy of G.I. Joe?

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        Because while they suck at carrying out missions, COBRA is masterful at logistics and resource gathering. So they simply replace the COBRA Commandos with SAS troopers for the final assault and you have a winning combination.

  17. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Leave Obama Alone! Liberals Actually Believe Obama Is the First President to Be Publicly Criticized

    For some reason, this blog post from 2013 is making the rounds on social media. It's called "A Canadian's View on Our Disrespect of President Obama's Presidency." The Canadian is William Thomas, an "author, a scriptwriter and a nationally syndicated humour columnist," and the post is utter, ahistorical nonsense?in other words: perfectly in keeping with the "criticism of Obama is unprecedented" crowd!

    ...snip...

    Obama, the Canadian writes, is being "treated with the kind of deep disrespect to which no previous president was subjected." So he's presumably suggesting that 2000 and 2004 were years in which "Americans, regardless of their political stripes, rallied round" President George W. Bush?you know, the guy who "stole the election," had liberals threatening to move to Canada, and inspired assassination-themed fan fiction. Ok, fine, but people these days are just way meaner to Obama...

    1. Jensen   11 years ago

      Meanwhile, in Canada, the terms 'fascist', 'soft dictatorship' and 'police state' are used to describe the reign of Stephen Harper.

    2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      Our founding was based on distrust of government. People criticized George Fucking Washington.

      1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

        And he was 6'20" and killed for fun!

        1. Drax the Destroyer   11 years ago

          And with those wooden teeth, he was the first "cyborg" president. Nixon was second.

        2. Not a Libertarian   11 years ago

          He'll save children, but not the British children.
          He'll save children, but not the British children.
          He'll save children, but not the British children.
          He'll save children, but not the British children?

        3. Xeones   11 years ago

          And he weighed a fucking ton!

    3. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

      And "chimpy mchitlerburton" doesn't link to over 6K google references to our previous president.

  18. Jordan   11 years ago

    The prime minister of the United Kingdom, David Cameron, met with the Cobra committee

    The UK is run by Cobra? No wonder we kicked those assholes to the curb.

    1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      "Just wait until you see what happens if Scotland tries to leave!"

      /Cobra Commander

    2. robc   11 years ago

      Dammit, now I feel like Ted S.

      1. Jordan   11 years ago

        PWND

      2. Ted S.   11 years ago

        Better you feel like me than you feel me. 😐

    3. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

      Yeah, ICE and VIPR are much more heroic names.

  19. robc   11 years ago

    Cobra committee

    UK is teaming up with the bad guys? I guess, no surprise.

  20. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Nightmarish Cricket That Eats Anything Is Now Invading the US

    A cricket with a voracious appetite for anything ? including members of its own species ? is now spreading across the eastern United States with no end to the invasion in sight.

    The invader, known as the greenhouse camel cricket (Diestrammena asynamora), is described in the latest issue of the journal PeerJ.

    "The good news is that camel crickets don't bite or pose any kind of threat to humans," Mary Jane Epps, a postdoctoral researcher at North Carolina State and lead author of the paper, said in a press release.

    1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      Counter attack with camel spiders!

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        The camel apes will freeze to death when the first hard frost hits.

        1. pan fried wylie   11 years ago

          No, the camel camels freeze after stampeding the camel apes. Duh.

    2. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      A cricket with a voracious appetite for anything .... "The good news is that camel crickets don't bite or pose any kind of threat to humans,"

      Those two statements are contradictory. Either they eat anything, or they don't bite, it can't be both.

      1. robc   11 years ago

        Maybe they swallow whole?

      2. Knarf Yenrab!   11 years ago

        Outside of eating billions of dollars worth of crops, deer pose no threat to human beings.

        1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

          Or auto wrecks. I suspect running into a cricket will do less harm than one of those hoofed rats.

        2. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

          Except when they are in the road, where they kill more humans than any other animal in North America.

          1. Knarf Yenrab!   11 years ago

            Outside of eating billions of dollars worth of crops and occasionally darting out in front of your car because they feel it's a moral imperative to cross the road right fucking now, deer pose no threat to human beings.

            Outside of "broom her fast," best advice my father gave me was that when you see one deer, expect another. I can't count the number of times I've had a deer run out in front of me only to have one or two more a second behind. Probably the only reason I've never hit one head on.

    3. Knarf Yenrab!   11 years ago

      If it crossbreeds with the killer bees that, according to my Boy's Life subscription, arrived in 1989, I'm headed to Canada, gun control or no.

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        They were talking about African killer bees when I was in elementary school in the 70s.

        1. Knarf Yenrab!   11 years ago

          And somehow we managed to avert that disaster as well as global cooling and malthusian starvation, and all without anyone ever reciting a mea culpa.

          Pseudo-scientific prophesies never die, they just fade away.

    4. sarcasmic   11 years ago

      All crickets are cannibalistic.

      1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

        Cannibalistic Cricketoid Underground Dwellers

        CCUD...no ring to it.

        1. SugarFree   11 years ago

          But C-CUD! is the Law and Order noise.

          1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

            Nice.

  21. Jensen   11 years ago

    The prime minister of the United Kingdom, David Cameron, met with the Cobra committee discuss the U.K.'s response to a threat by ISIL to behead a British hostage.

    The Cobra Committee may have their own anti-terrorism problems.

    1. hamilton   11 years ago

      Okay, now look people. Obvious joke is obvious. You don't see Fist doing any GI Joe jokes do you? DO YOU?

      We have to up our game here people. reason demands it. Fist demands it.

      1. Jensen   11 years ago

        Looks like we got a Cobra sympathizer here. Sergeant Slaughter, two weeks in the hole followed by waterboarding will make him talk.

        1. hamilton   11 years ago

          I don't spill for no WWF co-marketing schemes. It'll take Doctor Mindbender's best work to make me talk!

          1. Jensen   11 years ago

            WWE, good sir. Looks like you'll have to spend an hour in the Pain Box with Ling Ling the Panda.

            "Dr. Bender was at one time a peace-loving orthodontist. He built a machine to relieve dental pain, using electric brainwave stimulation. Unfortunately he tested it on himself, and when it went haywire, he became hateful, deceitful and vain."

            Holy shit, that's the best comic villain backstory I've ever read.

            1. hamilton   11 years ago

              No True childhood-GI Joe-Viewer would call it the WWE, young'un.

              1. Jensen   11 years ago

                I'm twenty four and Canadian, old man. GI Joe was something I watched from the Long-Ago Times When Reagan Had A Boxing Match with Gorbachev that Won the Cold War...or something.

                1. hamilton   11 years ago

                  Twenty four? Christ, the millennial articles are working. Hat-tip, Nick.

                  1. Hyperion   11 years ago

                    And Canadian!

                  2. Jensen   11 years ago

                    I was here not commenting way before the Millennial push. And honestly all the Millennial articles have done is shown that Reason likes to confuse political apathy that tends to lean left for libertarianism.

                2. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

                  Real GI Joes had life-like hair and Kung-fu grip, and use to beat up Ken and take Barbie to the 'Submarine Races'.

      2. Drax the Destroyer   11 years ago

        So...we can make GI Joe jokes while dropping the words "fuck", "cunt", and "meekrob" constantly. Got it.

      3. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

        I would have made a joke about Cameron planning his health insurance coverage in anticipation of being ousted.

  22. Aloysious   11 years ago

    To use Old Testament lingo, 'Windows 8 doth sucketh and bloweth'.

    I do not like.

    1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      Windows 8 is an offense against Heaven and Earth, and it stinks in the nostrils of God.

      1. Aloysious   11 years ago

        I like yours better.

      2. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

        This is what happens when you try to hybridize a computer and a smartphone. Mac OSX as well.

        1. Aloysious   11 years ago

          It is an epic fail. Stoopid phone thingies.

          /luddite

          1. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

            It is an epic fail. Stoopid phone thingies.

            I actually love my smartphone and by netbook, but I do not want the same smartphone look and feel on my home or work computer. Different tools for different uses.

            1. Aloysious   11 years ago

              Agreed. I was just being childish.

            2. Ted S.   11 years ago

              It bothers me how many websites seem to be optimizing for people who use fondle-screen technology. I've noticed it especially in photo galleries that bring up the full-size photo as an overlay, and trying to right-click and open in a new tab often no longer works.

              1. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

                It bothers me how many websites seem to be optimizing for people who use fondle-screen technology.

                I think that is the way the internet is going. One way of looking at it across all the different devices being used (computer, ipad, smartphone, netbook, etc).

    2. robc   11 years ago

      Windows 8 doth sucketh and bloweth

      FTFY

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Now, now, Windows 7 is a decent OS. Which is why MS had to kill it with fire.

        1. robc   11 years ago

          I stand behind my comment.

          However, I should point out that I havent owned a MS OS since Windows ME RC0.

          1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

            Ah yes. The Ballmer Peak.

        2. Andrew S.   11 years ago

          But the next version of Windows will be good. They've been doing this for a while.

          Windows 98 SE: Great!
          Windows ME: Ugh
          Windows XP: Great!
          Windows Vista: Ugh
          Windows 7: Great!
          Windows 8: Ugh

          1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

            XP was the first decent OS they produced, except maybe DOS, but it was flawed. Windows 7 is the first and only one I'd say was a very good OS. They should've stopped there.

            1. Juice   11 years ago

              XP was the first decent OS they produced

              Are you forgetting NT and 2000?

          2. Juice   11 years ago

            Let me FTFY:

            Windows 98 SE: Ugh
            Windows ME: Ugh
            Windows 2000: Great!
            Windows XP: Ugh then later OK
            Windows Vista: Ugh
            Windows 7: Great!
            Windows 8: Ugh

    3. KDN   11 years ago

      8.0 was a buggy mess, but after upgrading out of it I've never really understood the hate for W8. It's just Windows 7 w/ an unnecessary layer of start-screen functionality that you never have to use.

      1. thom   11 years ago

        That layer of unnecessary start screen functionality seems to flow my computer down. A lot. Every time I try to search for something, lock my computer, login, etc it bogs down and takes forever, whereas Windows 7 works perfectly. W8 was just so unnecessary.

        1. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

          On my Wife's laptop, which has a touch-pad, the touchscreen bullshit is always making apps disapear and causing us to jump between different thngs. Meanwhile some apps and programs will continue to run in the background for a week, because they were started in the start-screen.

          Fuck W8 with a wire-brush french tickler.

  23. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Another 1998 Disaster for Republicans?

    Some Republicans argue that they're better off not running on an agenda this year, too. They think it's the height of political wisdom not to interfere with an opponent who is self-destructing. These people always raise the 2006 elections to illustrate their point. They say that a purely oppositional message won a congressional landslide for Democrats that year. In fact, the Democrats did run on an agenda, including money for stem-cell research, tax hikes on "Big Oil" and a higher minimum wage. Democrats were also more popular back then than Republicans are today.

    1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

      Of course, the 1998 parallel I've been drawing has its limits. Obama has a much lower job-approval rating than Clinton did. The risk Republicans are running isn't that they'll lose seats. It's that they'll blow their opportunity, failing to win all the seats they could and failing to set themselves up to become a governing party in 2016.

      Why would bother writing something and then basically tell your readership to disregard everything you wrote in the final paragraph? What an asinine activity.

      1. DJF   11 years ago

        Its so they can say they were right no matter what happens.

      2. robc   11 years ago

        With that, as long as the Dems hold one seat, he can claim he was correct.

  24. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Yesterday, I had breakfast in Bozeman. The very nice waitress brought me a copy of the paper which had a truly awful editorial cartoon*. It made me long for the days of the weeping Statue of Liberty. It featured a "news crew" and a cop, in Ferguson, Missourah. The gist of the message was that the Mainstream Media are unjustly smearing the Noble Law Enforcement Professionals of this great nation.

    We are evidently besieged by the worst of the worst criminal elements, and will be overrun by the savages if cops are not free to gun down jaywalkers with impunity.

    What an odious, disgusting excrescence. I want to hunt down the "artist" and stab him in the eye with my mechanical pencil.

    *I tried to find a link, but failed.

    1. Aloysious   11 years ago

      Maybe it is time to write a strongly worded letter to the editor?

      I start mine off with "Dear fuckheads..."

  25. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Luxe West Village condos plagued by tenant's 'violent outbursts and inappropriate behavior': suit

    Repulsive renter Richard Easton and his defecating dog turned a posh West Village condo into a hellhole over the last five weeks, leaving terrified neighbors cowering in their homes, a lawsuit charged Tuesday.

    Easton, who charges clients up to $100,000 for a love connection, wandered the building lobby naked from the waist down and demanded oral sex from a female employee, the suit charged.

    Condo owner Elena Taranina said that was just the tip of the not-so-niceberg: Easton tossed knives at delivery people, ordered the staff to call him "Prince" ? and let his dog poop all over the building roof.

    1. Elspeth Flashman   11 years ago

      He sounds like a lot of fun at parties.

    2. Tim   11 years ago

      Which congressional district does he represent?

    3. SugarFree   11 years ago

      Pepper spray dem nutz.

    4. Brett L   11 years ago

      I don't understand. The one time I would cheer for the cops, and they are nowhere to be seen in the summary.

  26. Tonio   11 years ago

    Just a followup to the Illinois incident where people collecting signatures for ballot access for libertarian candidates were hassled by goons presumably hired by the GOP: 1) We have apparently arrived in that we are now perceived as a threat; yay. 2) Welcome to the world of politics; expect a lot more dirty tricks in the future, especially in regards to getting on the ballot.

    I am puzzled as to how the people hiring the goons thought they could get away with that in the era of the internet. That was profoundly stupid on their part.

    1. KDN   11 years ago

      That was profoundly stupid on their part.

      Stupidity? From the Republican party? Surely you jest.

  27. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    President Obama arrived in Tallinn, Estonia ahead of a NATO summit in Wales

    Somebody hould buy that idjit a map.

  28. NYC Liberal   11 years ago

    Obama has apparently taken the bait and back we go to Iraq.

    It is my understanding that ISIS (a Sunni outfit) is nothing more than the Baath party that the neocons ousted due to WMDs. They are "taking their country back" evidently.

    I'm still for non-intervention in the mid-east. We will accomplish nothing now as we've accomplished nothing in the last few years.

    I voted for Obama in 2008 in hopes that he would be dovish. Evidently, either he's a closet case hawk or the military political machine in America is unstoppable.

    1. robc   11 years ago

      There were more than 2 options on the ballot in 2008. Including in NY State.

      1. robc   11 years ago

        Nader 41,249
        Barr 19.596
        McKinney 12,801
        Calero 3,615
        LaRiva 1,639
        Baldwin 646
        Paul 341
        Keyes 37
        Moore 11
        Allen 1

        1. robc   11 years ago

          That is 19k for Barr, not 19 and a fraction.

          Im sure someone on that list was actually dovish.

        2. An Innocent Man   11 years ago

          Or do what I do: I write my own name in, for every election. I'm the only person who is right on every single issue.

      2. NYC Liberal   11 years ago

        I am a liberal. And, I thought Obama was a liberal. Boy was I wrong.

        I ended up voting for Gary Johnson in 2012. Too bad he's not running in 2016.

        1. Tim   11 years ago

          You get Hillary next, woo hoo.

          1. John   11 years ago

            And he will be voting for her.

          2. NYC Liberal   11 years ago

            I am hoping for Elizabeth Warren.

            1. An Innocent Man   11 years ago

              So, you're saying your incapable of learning from experience?

            2. hamilton   11 years ago

              Oh, dear. Here we go.

            3. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

              LOL

            4. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

              I am hoping for Elizabeth Warren.

              Why, what qualities does she bring to the job of Prez? What executive experience does she have? She would be a greater disaster than 0, if that is possible.

            5. OldMexican   11 years ago

              Re: NYC Liberal,

              Elizabeth Warren is no liberal. She's a fascist.

              1. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

                I think it's cute that NYCL has been so easily duped by all these run-of-the-mill, standard-issue politicians into thinking they actually have some sort of ideology.

              2. Restoras   11 years ago

                NYC Liberal is one of those Progressives that wants to conveniently forget the history of his movement.

            6. Jensen   11 years ago

              Nothing says 'liberal' like flipping foreclosed homes while decrying 'evil bankers' for doing it.

            7. Hyperion   11 years ago

              Ah yes, the great White Squaw, that will fix things, lmao.

              1. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

                It's the whole "if only the right people were in charge" thing again. Top. Men.

                1. Xeones   11 years ago

                  I dunno, you guys, if Warren tried to run for president it would be HILARIOUS.

        2. John   11 years ago

          I am a liberal. And, I thought Obama was a liberal. Boy was I wrong.

          He was never a liberal. It couldn't be that he is a failure because he was a liberal. Nope. He was never one in the first place. You really except anyone outside the hive to believe that?

          Sell stupid elsewhere. Tony and Shreek have got us full up. Obama is a liberal and the first real Prog President we have had since Wilson. You own him.

          1. robc   11 years ago

            Once the liberals learn that liberal!=progressive, maybe they will start voting better.

            I may not agree with them on much, but at least liberals can be worked with. Progressives are just entirely wrong.

          2. Restoras   11 years ago

            He's being honest and straightforward and so far hasn't resorted to ad hominems. Not like Tony and Shriek. Still stupid but at least honest.

        3. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

          I ended up voting for Gary Johnson in 2012. Too bad he's not running in 2016.

          Last I heard, he was planning on running.

          1. John   11 years ago

            I seriously doubt NY Liberal did any such thing in 12, so I don't thin it matters, at least to him.

            1. Restoras   11 years ago

              I know a lot of liberals who are very, very disappointed in The Great Obumbler. Most of that has come in the second term, to be sure, but it is still possible.

              The mask of incompetence slipped when he signed that order to close Gitmo in a year. He just has no clue.

              1. Hyperion   11 years ago

                He doesn't have many loyalists remaining these days. Our own Buttplug being one of the few bitter clingers.

    2. Drax the Destroyer   11 years ago

      Killing craptons of people and accidentally facilitating the killing of more craptons of people does not count as "nothing." However, it probably doesn't come anywhere close to accomplishing something "good."

    3. jmomls   11 years ago

      *It is my understanding that ISIS (a Sunni outfit) is nothing more than the Baath party that the neocons ousted due to WMDs. They are "taking their country back" evidently.*

      Isn't Assad a ba'athist as well?

  29. userve32   11 years ago

    Sounds like a very good deal.
    http://www.Crypt-Anon.tk

  30. Iucundus (ex Damned Fool)   11 years ago

    Recently, from college derp...

    I know I missed the rape prevention discussion of a few days ago, but the controversy about the date-rape drug-discovering nail polish reminded me of what a guy who's becoming an RA told me about his training. Apparently they specifically do not advocate preventative measures. At all. At the same time, half of freshman orientation and a good chunk of RA training is about rape and what to do after the fact. Fuck, you'd think they just want to keep people dependent on the grievance lobby or something.

    On another note, I was trying to defend libertarianism to two liberals. The first was making a case for why libertarianism should support a welfare state to remedy past injustices, confusing us for some kind Scandinavian social democracy. The second guy, after the first left, said "He doesn't actually understand this, does he?" When I nodded in relief, he went on, "The ideal libertarian state is one where all citizens consent by voting on every policy, isn't it?" When I tried to explain to him that there wouldn't be policies in the first place, he got this really confused look on his face and asked me, "But what would the government do?" FFS

    1. Jordan   11 years ago

      Huh. In my experience, everyone just thinks that libertarians are anarchists.

      1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

        Not just anarchists, but stoned anarchists.

        1. Andrew S.   11 years ago

          I thought we were just Republicans who want to smoke pot.

          1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

            Somalian cultural appropriators seems to be the latest trend.

          2. hamilton   11 years ago

            Don't forget the ass sex. And cocktails.

      2. thom   11 years ago

        And by "anarchist", they mean that big corporations would control the government, in order to control all of the people, in order to make horrible, horrible profits.

  31. Elspeth Flashman   11 years ago

    OT: I am defending a deposition today.

    1. mr lizard   11 years ago

      Sucks for you, I will be climbing into heavy machinery.... After I win my current fight with SAP

      1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

        no one beats SAP.

      2. Matrix   11 years ago

        There is no winning with SAP.

        1. mr lizard   11 years ago

          I am relieved that I am not alone in this fight

    2. tarran   11 years ago

      I suggest the following strategy:

      Deny everything. Baldrick

      1. Iucundus (ex Damned Fool)   11 years ago

        And be careful to ask the right person for the sponge bag.

      2. Elspeth Flashman   11 years ago

        +1 fluffy pigeon. Actually we are denying . . . long story but client needs to use the 5th amendment.

  32. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    "But what would the government do?"

    Play golf. On their own dime.

  33. Stilgar   11 years ago

    The tech company Apple denies ...

    Didn't you mean to write: The phone manufacturer Apple denies...

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      Didn't you mean to write: The phone manufacturer Apple denies...

      Didn't you mean to write: The phone design company Apple denies...

  34. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    In my experience, everyone just thinks that libertarians are anarchists.

    ROBBER BARONS ARE NOT ANARCHISTS!

    1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

      Stupid libertarians don't understand that when rich capitalists bring goods, services and jobs to society, that they're exploiting us! I mean, they make profits! No fair!

  35. John   11 years ago

    So still nothing from Reason on the Rotherham scandal. It puts them on the same intellectual level as Feministing and Jezebel, both of whom despite being obsessed with "rape culture" haven't uttered a word about a real rape culture in the UK.

    1. Andrew S.   11 years ago

      And here we see John in his Red Tony form.

      1. John   11 years ago

        WTF Rotherham have to do with Team Red? Were Democrats raping girls in Rotherham and I just missed it?

        Are you retarded Andrew? Do you not know that the UK is not part of the USA? Seriously, WTF is the matter with you?

        1. Jordan   11 years ago

          He was referring to this:

          It puts them on the same intellectual level as Feministing and Jezebel

          Premium derp.

          1. John   11 years ago

            Sorry Jordan, you not liking it doesn't make it Derp when it is true. There are about ten good pro Libertarian angles to that story. It is a real case of socialism and government gone mad, just like it is a real example of a rape culture. Yet, neither Reason nor the feminist sites will touch it, despite it fitting their respective narratives. That puts them each on the same level.

            If you don't like something, rethink your views or make an argument instead of just yelling DERP and pretending it doesn't exist. It gets fucking old. You don't seem like a stupid person usually. Why do you act like one whenever you are confronted with an argument you don't like but can't refute?

            1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

              Not enough pot smoking mexican ass sex involved to pass the purity test.

            2. Jordan   11 years ago

              "Why won't you take my logical fallacies seriously?"

              1. John   11 years ago

                "Any analogy I don't like must be a fallacy"

                Jordan, do you think the people reading this are that dumb? What I wrote above makes perfect sense and you know it. Screaming and throwing shit doesn't help.

          2. Andrew S.   11 years ago

            That is indeed what I was referring to.

            1. John   11 years ago

              And that indeed Andrew was a perfectly valid analogy as I explain above. Are you too stupid to understand or respond to the analogy or just too much of a dickhead to admit that it is valid?

              Argument is really hard. Much easier just to scream and throw shit. But argument is kind of rewarding. You should try it sometime.

              1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                Assume is when you make an ass out of you and me. Except that we're not entertaining your assumptions. Which makes you the only ass.

                1. John   11 years ago

                  It doesn't matter why the are ignoring the story. They deserved to be criticized for doing so. And until either cover it or give a reason why, people have every right to draw whatever conclusions they want from Reason ignoring the story.

                  Would you give this kind of deference to the New York Times for failing to cover police abuse stories? I am pretty sure you assume it is because the NYT is just a bunch of pro cop hacks. And you are probably right about that. Why do you give Reason such benefit on this story?

                  1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                    Then maybe you should replace the editor. Obviously you know what they should cover better than they do. You should run the company.

                    1. John   11 years ago

                      How about I just point out their failure without being insulted by you and Andrew for doing so? How about that Sarcasmic?

                      If you don't think them not covering it is a big deal, good for you ignore the issue and don't respond to my complaining about it. I do think they should cover it and will continue to criticize them for it. Why does that bother you so much?

                    2. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                      You're the only one who is bothered here, Red Buttplug. You're bothered that we're mocking you instead of jumping to Reason's defense. Just like PB does when we mock him instead of jumping to BOOSH's defense.

                    3. John   11 years ago

                      You're the only one who is bothered here

                      No I am not. See the kanarf and icundrus below. And CPA. They all agree with me. Again, if you don't think it is a big deal, then don't worry about it.

                    4. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                      Who said I was worried?

                    5. John   11 years ago

                      Who said I was worried?

                    6. John   11 years ago

                      If you are not worried, then why are you on the thread? You are just being an asshole. You just admitted you don't care, yet you are still on here yelling insults and mucking up the thread. That is called trolling. I wasn't aware you were a troll. But perhaps I was wrong about that.

        2. sarcasmic   11 years ago

          Red Tony loves fallacies. Like the True Scotsman.

          That would be when Red Tony says Reason isn't a true libertarian publication because if it was then it would be covering what Red Tony wants it to cover. Only then will it be a true libertarian publication.

          1. John   11 years ago

            Okay, lets lay out the argument to you as well. There are about ten good pro Libertarian angles to that story. It is a real case of socialism and government gone mad, just like it is a real example of a rape culture. Yet, neither Reason nor the feminist sites will touch it, despite it fitting their respective narratives. That puts them each on the same level.

            Which part of that do you not understand? Try and refute the argument or at least think about it instead of throwing up buzz words. It is hard for you to do but I think you have it in you. Try writing an intelligent response to that point without yelling Red Tony. Come you, you can do it.

            1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

              Do you know exactly why they're not covering this story that you want them to cover? No? Me neither. Why don't you send an email to the editor? See what they say.

              Or you can speculate and make accusations and look like an ass.

              1. John   11 years ago

                It doesn't matter why they are not covering it. What matters is they should be and are not. It could be because they are afraid of Muslims. It could be because they are too PC to tell the story. It could be because it conflicts with the all important open borders narrative. I don't know. But it doesn't matter. No matter what their reason, they are being intellectually dishonest in ignoring the story just like the feminists are.

                1. Jordan   11 years ago

                  No matter what their reason, they are being intellectually dishonest in ignoring the story just like the feminists are.

                  Red Tony has declared it so.

                  1. John   11 years ago

                    Yes Jordan. Just yell Red Tony. Don't say why Reason isn't being intellectually dishonest. Whatever you do, don't fucking respond to the point. Just throw shit.

                    1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                      More like a Red Buttplug than a Red Tony at this point. Tony doesn't make wild accusations and then expect us to defend against them. That's PB's department. Blaming BOOSH and then getting mad when we don't defend him.

                      Which is what John is doing here. He's making wildly speculative accusations, and getting all pissy because we're mocking him instead of jumping to Reason's defense.

                    2. John   11 years ago

                      Oh really sarcasmic?

                      Has Reason covered the story? If not, it is hardly speculative to call them out for ignoring a story of that magnitude that says such horrible things about government.

                      And I am not the only one on here who thinks Reason won't cover this because of the immigration angle too. Are they like shreek too? No, I am different because unlike the others, I don't ignore you.

                2. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

                  It doesn't matter why they are not covering it.

                  Have you shot them an email on the story? They may not have seen it, I have not. Instead of bitching that they are not covering it, send it directly to them via email. If they do not respond, then bitch.

                  1. John   11 years ago

                    Yes I have. And no they haven't said a word about it. I think it is an important story for a lot of reasons. It really is the face of incompetent, uncaring, evil government. I think it is a big deal and Reason ought to cover it. Why exactly that makes me a pro GOP shill is something no one seems to be able to explain.

                    1. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

                      Yes I have. And no they haven't said a word about it. I think it is an important story for a lot of reasons. It really is the face of incompetent, uncaring, evil government. I think it is a big deal and Reason ought to cover it.

                      Hopefully all laid out in the email. But you do understand they can not cover everything. I would like to see more Sudan coverage and the tragedy going on there.

                    2. John   11 years ago

                      Ptah Hotep,

                      This story has made every major newspaper in the country including the NYT. Reason covers stories from the UK all of the time. They covered the stupid celebrity phone hacking story for God's sake. Anyone who follows the news, and the Reason staff certainly does that, knows about this story. They are not covering because they are choosing not to do so.

                      And this is a lot bigger deal than the Sudan.

                    3. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

                      And this is a lot bigger deal than the Sudan.

                      See, it depends on your point of view. I think the Sudan issue is leaps and bounds greater than this one, but this one is still bad.

                      http://www.theguardian.com/glo.....port-warns

                    4. John   11 years ago

                      It is a bigger issue than the Sudan because what happens in the UK tends to happen in the US about ten years later. The countries are very similar and have been falling down the same slippery slope, with the UK in the lead, for a very long time now. The Sudan while bad, is unlikely to have much effect on the US.

                    5. Ptah-Hotep   11 years ago

                      The Sudan while bad, is unlikely to have much effect on the US.

                      I do not look at the effect on countries, I look at the effect on individual people.

                      And the point is that they do not cover everything we would like them to cover.

                    6. John   11 years ago

                      And the point is that they do not cover everything we would like them to cover.

                      So what? That doesn't mean some stories are not objectively more important than others. Rotherham is a hell of a lot more important than Micheal Sam or the UK tabloid hacking scandal. Yet, the latter have been covered to death and Rotherham hasn't been touched.

                      Sorry but "we can't cover everything" doesn't feed the bulldog when you are ignoring important stories and covering less important ones.

                    7. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                      I first heard the story on NPR. Stick that in your sherry enema.

                    8. John   11 years ago

                      So NPR can cover it but Reason can't? You are not helping yourself sarcasmic.

                    9. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                      What's to help? I'm not defending Reason. What they cover or don't cover is their business. Literally.

                    10. John   11 years ago

                      I'm not defending Reason. What they cover or don't cover is their business. Literally.

                      Then shut up and stop mucking up the thread. You just admitted you have no point.

                    11. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                      My point is that it's none of your business either.

                      They're not covering this story at this time. So fucking what. NPR did. The British papers did. It's not like it's not being covered at all. Maybe Reason has a good reason not to cover it. I don't know, and neither do you.

                      So why don't you shut the fuck up and mind your own business? Be grateful they let you participate on their forum instead of getting all pissy when they ignore something that is important to you.

                    12. John   11 years ago

                      My point is that it's none of your business either.

                      Yes it is. I post on their board, read their ads and read their magazine. I have every right to criticize them, just like you do.

                      e grateful they let you participate on their forum instead of getting all pissy when they ignore something that is important to you.

                      That makes me laugh. If you want to spend your time kissing reason's ass, have fun. I don't roll that way. If I don't like something they do, I am going to say something about it. If you don't like that, then don't fucking respond. It doesn't concern you.

                    13. BigT   11 years ago

                      John and sarcasmic, chill out. You're going to blow it for Nick and Matt. They have a big expose planned for next month's issue. They have two stringers on 'the inside' who will have interviews with rapers and rapees, police reports, secretly recorded phone calls of politicians, and raw video of actual rapes. (and maybe some excellent Paki recipes for curried chicken)

                      Ix-nay with the itching-bay.

                    14. John   11 years ago

                      Now that is funny Big T.

        3. Andrew S.   11 years ago

          Isn't the UK one of the 57 states?

          Seriously, if you're going to talk below about arguing versus just flinging shit, throwing around insults like "retarded" doesn't exactly help your case.

          1. John   11 years ago

            If you don't want to be insulted, don't start yelling Red Tony in response to a valid post. You think it is okay to come here and yell insults and then whine when you get it back. You don't like being insulted, try not insulting people to start.

            What it comes down to is I made a point you don't like but don't have a good response for and you think you can get around it by throwing out some flip insult. Sorry, it doesn't work that way., You get an insult right back and be called for you inability to make a cogent argument.

      2. Restoras   11 years ago

        John points out that Reason has so far not mentioned anything about Rotherham. He also points our that Jezebel and Feministing have also so far not mentioned anything about Rotherham.

        There could be any number of reasons for this. Is it not fair to speculate why, or call Reason out on it?

        1. John   11 years ago

          There is no reason not to call them on it. It just that some people would rather be fanboys than think I guess.

          1. Restoras   11 years ago

            Everyone does this type of thing everyday, avoiding the uncomfortable especially if it makes you challenge your own assumptions and beliefs.

            I think we can safely assume there is no willful collusion.

            From the Jezebel and Feministing perspective, as the story does not contain the "rape culture" bogeyman "white male privilege" it isn't important because it won't advance their respective agendas.

            From the Reason perspective, it shines a light in the hazards of lax/non-existent immigration control combined with the lack of assimilation peculiar to Britain and its 'Asian' immigrants. Since Open/Lax Borders is a favorite cause for some/many Reason writers, it is convenient to ignore it.

            Reason could highlight Libertarian aspects, i.e.- right of individuals to self defense and the total lack of ability to do that in Britain. There are probably others as well. But so far have chosen not to.

            1. John   11 years ago

              The feminists don't cover it because multiculturalism says only white men are evil. In the end, they just care about scoring points against white men. They really don't care about rape.

              I think you are dead right about Reason. And that doesn't say good things about reason. If they want to be open borders, fine. But they should always be honest and confront the facts associated with the issue even when it cuts against their narrative. I don't think the case necessarily says bad things about open borders. It says bad things about the UK's inability to assimilate immigrants. But that is not the same thing as saying open borders are bad. It just says you also need to not corrupt your government be corrupted by PC.

            2. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

              "Reason could highlight Libertarian aspects, i.e.- right of individuals to self defense and the total lack of ability to do that in Britain."

              I'm not sure how that would help in this case. It wasn't a case of men grabbing random girls and dragging them into back alleys, they were lured into these situations and exploited. I'm not sure that having 12-year-old girls packing heat is ever much of a solution to anything anyway.

              There is the larger question of public docility, and the successful Marxist efforts to break down the family unit as the bedrock of society, leaving an apathetic, rapist-sympathizing bureaucracy as these girls' main "defender".

              1. John   11 years ago

                The girls might not have been able to pack, but their families could have. There are many examples of families calling the police only to be told to fuck off and being threatened by the gangs. An armed populace would have put a stop to that.

    2. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

      What does that have to do with millenials?

      1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

        I believe many of the rape victims were millennials, maybe we should poll them?

        1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

          They've been abused enough.

    3. RG   11 years ago

      It's always fun when a narrative runs into some politically incorrect facts.

    4. Knarf Yenrab!   11 years ago

      Rape that occurs due to PC, leftist policies is the price of civilization. They'll make as big a deal of this as they did of Bill Clinton.

      Re: Reason, you'd think this would at least merit a 24/7 blurb with two sarcastic comments below.

    5. Iucundus (ex Damned Fool)   11 years ago

      They probably want to avoid the "racism" allegations that are sure to follow if a libertarian site criticizes something a racial minority was responsible for. This doesn't mean I agree with them, I just don't think it's due to ignorance so much as a desire for self-preservation, whereas the Jezzies are just actively ignorant.

      1. Knarf Yenrab!   11 years ago

        Heckler's vetoes are too dangerous. If anything, Reason and libertarians in general should wade into the racial hotbeds to present our arguments and get used to being called a racist apologist for corporations.

      2. John   11 years ago

        You are just being Red Tony by even thinking that Reason should say anything. Jordan and Andrew told me so. And if they allow a hecklers' veto, they are cowards.

        I don't think it is that. I think they are just that insecure about open borders to talk about the story.

        1. Iucundus (ex Damned Fool)   11 years ago

          I don't think Shikha controls the editorial board. We all know that the Jacket does using Nick as its pawn.

        2. sarcasmic   11 years ago

          Hey! I've got an idea! Why don't you make some wild speculations and accusations, and then get mad when nobody jumps up to defend against them! You could be like PB blaming everything on Bush, and then getting mad when instead of defending him he is ridiculed! Great idea!

          Oh. You already did it. Never mind.

          1. John   11 years ago

            Are you Dave Weigel? Why do you have a whining and crying fit every time someone criticizes Reason?

            1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

              You're the only one who is whining and crying. Just you.

              "Why won't Reason cover this story! It's not fair! Not fair I tell you! If they were true libertarians then they'd cover it! But they're not! They're progressives! They're liberals! All because they won't cover this story! Why are you all picking on me? Huh! Stop picking on me! I said stop picking on me! Waaaaaaaaaaaaa-aaaaaaaaaaaaah!"

              1. John   11 years ago

                Again, if the story doesn't matter to you, then why do you care that it matters to the rest of us? You are the one who showed up to shit on someone else's thread,not me.

                Seriously, just shut the fuck and comment on something else if you don't like it.

                1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                  "Stop picking on me you big meanie!"

                  1. John   11 years ago

                    Sarcasmic,

                    You don't care and you have no point. You not picking on me. You are just making an ass of yourself and doing your best to obscure the point. That is what shreek does. You know, the thing you called me. Projection doesn't just happen in the theater.

            2. Iucundus (ex Damned Fool)   11 years ago

              Could the two of you just go back to the women wars already? At least we got the pictures back then.

              1. John   11 years ago

                Icundus,

                Sarcasmic has no point and you are correct, I should ignore him. Jordan and Andrew have enough shame to stop. He doesn't.

              2. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                What nude photo scandal? Victoria Justice holds her head high as she struts into LAX in trendy ensemble after confirming images of her were fake

                http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....-fake.html
                Waaaaaaaaaaay to skinny for John. Small tits equals boy as far as he's concerned.

                1. John   11 years ago

                  Sarcasmic,

                  If you think Reason should be covering something they are not, start a thread about it. I promise I won't come over and troll it and scream insults like you do mine.

                  Again, you have admitted multiple times that you have no point other than "I don't like you being mean to reason". Why don't you just post that once and move on?

                  1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                    Um, no. That wasn't my point.

                    My point was that you're being just like PB.

                    PB likes to make wild accusations, and then gets mad when we ridicule him instead of defending the accusations.

                    You're doing the exact same thing.

                    1. John   11 years ago

                      Take it up with Restoras, Metazoen and about the five other people who have posted on this thread agreeing with me sarcasmic. If it is such a wild accusation, why do so many people find it a reasonable point?

                      And more importantly, why aren't you trolling them as well? Is Restoras now a secret Red Tony too?

                      Again, you keep admitting you have no point and don't care about the issue. So why can't you leave it alone?

                    2. sarcasmic   11 years ago

                      "Stop picking on meeeeee!"

                    3. John   11 years ago

                      Sarcasmic,

                      No one but you objects to the argument. The board now is infested with secret Red Tonys.

                      And sarcasmic, you are not picking on me. You are not even being an asshole. I am sorry for saying you were. You are far too pathetic to worthy of such a charge.

    6. OldMexican   11 years ago

      Rotherham: politics 'imported from Pakistan' fuelled sex abuse cover-up ? MP

      I had to go to the conservative outlet to find out the pedophile gangs were all Pakistani. No one else is mentioning that little bit of information.

      1. Tim   11 years ago

        An inconvenient truth.

      2. sarcasmic   11 years ago

        I heard about it on NPR while driving. And they mentioned the part about them all being Pakistani.

        1. Restoras   11 years ago

          No one listens to NPR but good for them if they did.

          Every reference I saw to it referred to them as 'Asian'. When I hear the word 'Asian' I don't think 'South Asia', I think 'East Asia', as in China, Japan, SEA - like most people.

          Maybe the definition of 'Asian' is different in Britain - or maybe they are purposely using an over broad definition to avoid stating some unpleasant facts that are inconvenient to the narrative.

          1. John   11 years ago

            Having been to the UK multiple times, I have never once heard anyone refer to a Pakistani as an "Asian". The use of the term is a complete joke.

          2. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

            "Every reference I saw to it referred to them as 'Asian'. When I hear the word 'Asian' I don't think 'South Asia', I think 'East Asia', as in China, Japan, SEA - like most people."

            Like most people, or most Americans? We have direct access to the Pacific, and a history of relatively high immigration from East Asia. Immigration from India and Central Asia, less so, especially in the past.

        2. Iucundus (ex Damned Fool)   11 years ago

          I think Asian refers to Indian subcontinent in Britain.

          1. Restoras   11 years ago

            I know a few Brits. Never heard them refer to people from South Asia as Asian. Pakistanis, Indians, Sikhs, yes. Never as Asians, but it is a small and not necessarily representative sample so you may be right.

    7. Metazoan   11 years ago

      Agreed that it's ridiculous to not cover the story. They could even put a libertarian spin on it, noting that a lack of respect for the rule of law and underclass-creating welfare states can cause such a horrible solution.

      1. RG   11 years ago

        Or as yet another example of a government failing to protect the most vulnerable from real crimes, instead of the typical social justice bs.

      2. John   11 years ago

        That is not the half of it. There is also the corrupt police angle. And the total unaccountability of the government officials in charge. One of the high officials who ignored this agreed to resign from the Labor Party but not from his 150,000 pound a year job.

        So sarcasmic, is Metazoan like shreek too?

        1. INFORG   11 years ago

          I'm giving Reason the benefit of the doubt and they have someone working on a print story. I tried reading through some of the articles and background information, and it was overwhelming. There is a ton of material to go through - give it some time.

          1. Restoras   11 years ago

            Yup, this could easily be the correct explanation.

            1. John   11 years ago

              Maybe. But no mention of it in either the morning or PM links? No 24/7 mention? Maybe they have and I just missed it. But if not, that is a hell of a black out.

              Moreover, by the time they say something the story will have died down and the opportunity to make points missed.

              And show me where Reason doesn't say something about a story just because they are working on a longer piece because I can't think of an example. Can you?

              1. Restoras   11 years ago

                And show me where Reason doesn't say something about a story just because they are working on a longer piece because I can't think of an example. Can you?

                I can't. It may just be a case of writers working on too many other things, or no one within taking ownership and running with it. I don't know but agree that it is suspicious and disappointing.

                Moreover, by the time they say something the story will have died down and the opportunity to make points missed.

                I disagree. While the time may have passed to score rubber-necking eyeballs, I don't think the time will have passed to make thoughtful arguments and points.

                The Duke Lacrosse Team Gang Rape is a good example of not rushing in and waiting for the facts to reveal themselves - though an additional scalpel wouldn't hurt.

                1. John   11 years ago

                  The Duke Lacrosse Team Gang Rape is a good example of not rushing in and waiting for the facts to reveal themselves - though an additional scalpel wouldn't hurt.

                  Reason covered the living hell out of the Duke rape scandal from day one. So, I don't see how that analogy applies.

                  Time will tell. I think you are grasping for straws here. Lets see. I bet Reason never publishes a single long form article on it or does anything more than maybe give a single hit and run post about it after being shamed into it by people like me.

                  What do you say we give it until the 1st of the year. If there isn't a long form article from them by then, you admit on here what crap weasel cowards they are and how they didn't deserve the benefit of the doubt. If there is, I admit they were covering it and I should have given them the benefit of the doubt.

                  Deal?

                  1. Restoras   11 years ago

                    I was just pointing out that in that case the early 'facts' ended up being lies, and that as the story unfolded the actual facts came to light. It would have behooved those that rushed to demonize the lacrosse team to wait for the actual facts to be known before taking a stance.

                    Of course, the reason why many didn't was because it supported their narrative at the time. To have waited would have been a lost opportunity regardless of the truth.

                    The fact that Reason was all over the Duke story from the get go is actually troubling in comparison, so you are right the analogy isn't a good one.

                    I agree that the absence of the story from Reason is curious - do not mistake that. And Occam's Razor applies - the simplest explanation is an unwillingness to confront a story that challenges sacrosanct beliefs of left libertarians that includes many on the Reason staff. That doesn't mean that there isn't another explanation.

                    I think you are completely justified in calling them out on it, just as conservatives are justified in calling out the NYT, WaPo, CNN, et al and liberals are justified in calling out WSJ and Fox News.

                    I'll give them by Oct. 31 to cover it before joining you but I prefer to refrain from name calling.

                    One last thing: this story reeks of police cover-up just like Hillsborough. That alone seems reason enough to cover it.

                    1. John   11 years ago

                      I think there was more to it than "they were brown and kind of dangerous" going on here. I think the police were most likely on the take and being paid off by the gangs to look the other way. I totally agree with you about that.

                    2. John   11 years ago

                      In fact I think you could write a piece about how the right has it wrong. This didn't happen because of fears of racism. The officials are just claiming that to cover up the fact that they were on the take from the gangs.

  36. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

    ^^ Look what the cat dragged in.

    When's the next DC area meetup?

    1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

      Will it be the worst ever meetup?

      1. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

        Wouldn't Nicole have to be there for that to happen?

    2. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

      If you meetup 55 miles North of DC, I may show up.

      1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

        Uhh Maryland blows.

        1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

          Add three more miles and you should be in Pennsylvanis 🙂

          1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

            Pennslyvania, New Jersey and Ohio might be the worst.

            1. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

              No, IL is, we have Nicole.

            2. Mock-star   11 years ago

              Dont you dare put Yinzer territory in the same category as MD and NJ.

        2. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

          Whoah, at the very least Maryland is better than DC.

          1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

            Which part?

            1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

              The parts that do not border DC. And most of Baltimore.

              1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

                true Annapolis is nice. Baltimore just kind of sets you back.

              2. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

                Baltimore is seriously one of the worst places I have ever been to. I was so happy when the squeeze moved to Silver Spring.

                Anyhoo, we're talkin Virginny here. Which is better than DC and MD combined.

                1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

                  Damn straight.

                2. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

                  I'm still moving when I get the chance, but I see Virginia sucking in the near future.

                  My goal would be to get away from large populations of people.

                3. thom   11 years ago

                  For your average person, Baltimore is a safer, cheaper, more interesting place to live than DC.

                  1. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

                    Cheaper, yes.

                    1. thom   11 years ago

                      Cheaper, yes.

                      Unless you are involved in the illegal narcotics industry, Baltimore is absolutely safer than DC. It's not uncommon to hear of people randomly being robbed and assaulted in "nice" neighborhoods in DC, but that doesn't really happen in the "nice" neighborhoods in Baltimore. When it does it's news.

                      More interesting is a matter of personnel taste. I'll take the rich character of Charm City over the waves of self-important douche-bags any day.

    3. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

      Hey, when you goin Skiing again? Come to Colorado and we can have a mountain meet-up...I don't think sloop likes snow though. I already have my Copper passes.

      It is going to be an awesome year I have a feeling with all the global cooling eehh I mean global climate change.

      1. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

        Breckenridge is on my short list, for sure. Would be early Feb.

  37. Hyperion   11 years ago

    POTUS Obozo says we need to 'organize' the Arab world.

    Organize Arab world

    1. Hyperion   11 years ago

      Isn't the problem that we've been trying to 'organize' the Arab world for like 60 years?

      1. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

        Going on 100 years now.

      2. Restoras   11 years ago

        Well, he is a Community Organizer, and the Arab World is arguably a Community in need of Organization, so of course he is arrogant and stupid enough to want to Organize it.

    2. Iucundus (ex Damned Fool)   11 years ago

      But this time we have the right top men!

    3. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      Ah, so he's come around. Which of the following will be the method of organization?

      ? Restoration of the Byzantine Empire.
      ? Restoration of the Persian Empire.
      ? Restoration of the Ottoman Empire.

      1. tarran   11 years ago

        My ancestors helped pacify the eastern provinces of anatolia.

        Given a free hand in the east, we can do so again. :E

        1. OldMexican   11 years ago

          Re: tarran,

          My ancestors helped pacify the eastern provinces of [A]natolia.

          You mean the Romans?

          1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

            He means Virgil "The Turk" Sollozzo.

          2. Brett L   11 years ago

            Mirthridates Upator.

    4. hamilton   11 years ago

      Community Organizing: not the sharpest tool in the toolbox, but what the hey, right?

    5. Knarf Yenrab!   11 years ago

      So . . . hire a class of political consultant whose chief incentive will be to stir up ethnic conflicts for the next three generations to promote the continued relevance and existence of his job?

    6. BigT   11 years ago

      It sure would be great if we could find a strongman to run Iraq who really put the fear of Zod into the populace and stood up to Iran and didn't upset the oil markets much.

    7. Jensen   11 years ago

      Yeah, because that worked so well in 1919. It's not like half the problems in the Middle East directly stem from the Paris Peace Conference or anything...

    8. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      Ummm....

      http://www.arableagueonline.org/

  38. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Do you not know that the UK is not part of the USA?

    No shit. Why should I obsess frantically about domestic sex crimes in England? Unless you believe I should extrapolate from that a dire need to round up all the Pakis in America and put them in concentration camps? Maybe we should castrate them, too. You can't be too careful, and we wouldn't want to waste a chance to terrify the rubes.

    1. John   11 years ago

      Or maybe it has to do with the failure of government and nothing whatsoever to do with the Pakis? Maybe you think it is all about the Pakis. But I am pretty sure it is about the failure of socialism, something a lot of people over here seem to like.

    2. John   11 years ago

      Brooks,

      Do you really think the story is just about the Pakis? Are you that big of a fucking racist? Or are you just that big of a socialist that you think socialism would work if we just didn't have those fucking Pakistanis around to mess it up?

  39. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Screaming and throwing shit doesn't help. -John

    Then why do you do it so often?

    1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

      LOL

    2. John   11 years ago

      Because I enjoy pointing out things you people don't like. And you are the one who is putting out all the racist things about Pakistanis not me. You are the one who thinks the story is about them not the failure of big government.

    3. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

      It is an attempt to label everyone here an idiot, dumb ass, illiterate, ignorant, etc. And then wonder why people won't pay attention or hold him in slight regard? Manners were ne'er spoke of excepting in a disparaging way, growing up?

      1. John   11 years ago

        I don't label anyone anything they they don't do the same. What happens is, I point out something people don't like but don't have a good response to. So the response is to just start yelling insults like Jordan, Andrew and Sarcasmic did above. Well, I don't take that lying down.

        I never insulted anyone. I pointed out that Reason is being just as cowardly about this story as the feminists sites are. Instead of responding to the valid point, the response was to yell "Red Tony". If your answer to an argument is to just yell red tony, you are an idiot and deserved to be called out as much. Go find any place on these threads were someone makes a cogent argument where I don't respond in kind, including agreeing with them where I think they make a good point. You won't. What you will find is that I have no tolerance for the "just yell names and call him a partisan if you don't have a point" and respond in kind. If you can't handle that and think that people who dissent on this board should be intimidated, well that is just too damned bad.

  40. OldMexican   11 years ago

    Hawks on both sides of the aisle in Congress want the president to act after the Islamic State (ISIL)

    Let's bomb them back to the stone age! Even though that is not possible in a global economy with well-funded black markets, but oh well. We need to justify all those arms appropriation bills by breaking stuff, anyway.

    1. John   11 years ago

      I am pretty sure we could bomb them back to a radioactive parking lot. So there is that.

      1. OldMexican   11 years ago

        Well, nuclear bombs are kind of expensive to replace; not so with conventional ordnance.

        1. jmomls   11 years ago

          *Well, nuclear bombs are kind of expensive to replace; not so with conventional ordnance.*

          But we've got thousands of nukes that we paid for already, and gosh darnit, I want to see some of them put to use.

  41. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Dear John,

    Please pull your head out of your ass.

    hth.

    1. John   11 years ago

      Dear Brook,

      Go fuck yourself and learn to stop thinking every story is about the evil Pakistanis. Some of them are nice people. You should try getting out and meeting them sometime.

  42. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    This guy got lucky. Normally asserting your rights falls under failure to obey, and we know where that goes.

  43. hamilton   11 years ago

    That totally did not end the way I thought it would. For which I am grateful.

  44. Matrix   11 years ago

    Watched it yesterday. They really were trying to intimidate the guy. I know they made up that shit about "she said you were friends" or "she said he was here." Complete and utter bullshit to try and justify them entering the property.

  45. Bones   11 years ago

    That is awesome. They changed their whole approach when he said it was being recorded straight to youtube.

  46. hamilton   11 years ago

    I have dreamed of an app called "dead drop" that streams your phone live to a password-protected youtube video. Which password ceases to be required 24 hours after upload unless you log in to tell it otherwise. And there'd be a special page for all the uploads that went past 24 hours so everyone could find them easily.

  47. Hyperion   11 years ago

    The USA Detroit has long been run by criminals.

    FIFY

    So why is it that they decided to put this one guy in prison out of all the crooks in this country? He's like a Saint compared to Hillary.

  48. Restoras   11 years ago

    FtT

    Nope. They've transferred their Militant Progressivist Fantasies to Warren. She is their Great White Hope.

  49. Swiss Servator, Bern baby Bern   11 years ago

    WIN

  50. True Scottsman   11 years ago

    I thought she was Native American.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Alton Brown on Cultural Appropriation, Ozempic, and the USDA

Nick Gillespie | From the June 2025 issue

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Sapping Small Business Optimism

Autumn Billings | 5.16.2025 12:00 PM

Andor Is a Star Wars Show About the Brutality of Bureaucracy

Peter Suderman | 5.16.2025 10:10 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!