Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Maggie McNeill on How the Study Linking Prostitution, Rape, and STIs in Rhode Island Is Wrong

Reason Staff | 8.24.2014 12:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | COYOTE Georgia Chapter/Facebook
(COYOTE Georgia Chapter/Facebook)
COYOTE Georgia Chapter/Facebook

Earlier this year, a study from researchers Scott Cunningham and Manisha Shah showed that in 2004-2009, Rhode Island experienced a steep decline in cases of rape and gonorrhea. The authors attribute this to the fact that prostitution was decriminalized in Rhode Island during this time period. The study was widely reported, with outlets from The Washington Post to Vox chirping about the unintended but happy effects of that time "Rhode Island accidentally legalized prostitution."

But there's a problem with these statements, notes Maggie McNeill: the "accidental" decriminalization was nothing of the kind. In July 1976, the first sex-worker rights organization, COYOTE, filed a lawsuit challenging the Rhode Island law which criminalized the sale or purchase of sex by consenting adults. In May 1980, the state legislature settled the case by amending the law so as to render the issues raised in the lawsuit moot. There was nothing remotely accidental about this process, McNeill points out . And there's no reason to think that the arbitrary time period researchers studied should be significant to anyone who was actually buying or selling sex throughout the 23 years prior. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: No, Rhode Island Didn't 'Accidentally' Decriminalize Prostitution

Reason Staff
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (0)

Latest

Andy Serkis on Animal Farm, Authoritarianism, and Humanizing Monsters

Nick Gillespie | From the August/September 2026 issue

John Fetterman Says He's 'Very Libertarian in a Lot of Ways'

Nick Gillespie | From the August/September 2026 issue

Dispatch From COGE: A Bureaucratic Meeting About Cutting Bureaucratic Bloat

Meagan O'Rourke | 7.10.2026 4:53 PM

She Came to the U.S. at 4 Months Old. She Had To Self-Deport—Because She Came Here Legally.

Billy Binion | 7.10.2026 4:16 PM

Sen. Mitch McConnell's Hospitalization Proves Again That Gerontocracy Sucks

Ronald Bailey | 7.10.2026 3:55 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason