Calif. Bill Mandating Condoms in Porn Discreetly Tossed in Trash Can Under Nearby Night Table


The porn industry in California (at least the parts not in Los Angeles) is safe again. Legislation that attempted to extend across the state L.A.'s mandate that all porn actors wear condoms has died. From SFist:
A bill that would have made it a criminal act to shoot pornography in California without condoms got permanently shelved today by the State Senate's Appropriations Committee.
The bill, introduced by SoCal Assemblyman Isadore Hall, seemed well intentioned with a view toward protecting the health and safety of workers in the porn industry, i.e. porn stars. However, as most porn models and industry folk argued over the last several months, the bill was attempting to address a problem that had already been solved almost a decade ago within the industry itself. As porn model Lorelei Lee and others reiterated before the Senate committee last week, no model has been infected with HIV on a porn set since 2004.
SFist notes that the bill was put "in suspense" last week and the Senate Appropriations Committee decided to keep it there because the state lacked the money to actually implement it (which is kind of what is happening in Los Angeles, too).
It does likely mean that the porn industry won't be running off to Las Vegas to film there instead, so maybe it will mean the AIDS Healthcare Foundation might abandon its efforts to manipulate Nevada's occupational safety laws to try to mandate condom use there as well.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Oh you. That's not the problem that condom mandaters are trying to solve.
No, you are wrong about that.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....44401.html
From SFist
A strange fusion of Fist of Etiquette and SugarFree?
Good God, man! What hath you wrought?
I think we all know who the dominant personality would be.
Yeah, but Warty's not involved.
We don't talk about that clonging project gone awry. Theirs was not the genetic material that was supposed to be used.
"A strange fusion of Fist of Etiquette and SugarFree?"
It is born
Sort of a missing link.
Great headline.
Hopefully it did not catch the rim, to brown and fester until picked off by the nanny.
Growing up I always made the au pair do that. After all, she's the one who insisted on its use in the first place.
Lucky Bastard, I used them as I didn't want my stuffed rabbit to smell bad.
Nothing left to cut! NOTHING!
Let's not start a circumcision thread here.
the Senate Appropriations Committee decided to keep it there because the state lacked the money to actually implement it
You mean they couldn't find ANY volunteers to "monitor the action" on porn sets to make sure everyone was using condoms?
Regulatory capture!
Maybe there could be some sort of online training course...
Ah, so the bribes and graft finally sated the lawmakers. What's for dessert?
I've never understood how porn can be legal to make but prostitution is illegal. What fucked up country this is.