Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Judgement Day for Justin Amash, Business Leaders Push Africa Trade Changes, Sweet Debate at the FDA: A.M. Links

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 8.5.2014 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Justin Amash/Facebook
(Justin Amash/Facebook)
  • Rep. Justin Amash/Facebook

    Voters in Kansas, Michigan, and Washington head to the primary ballot boxes today. Incumbent Republican Rep. Kerry Bentivolio is expected to lose in Michigan, but several other incumbents—including Reps. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) and Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.)—are predicted to keep their seats. 

  • Meanwhile in Mississippi, state Sen. Chris McDaniel is claiming that results of the GOP's June primary, in which Sen. Thad Cochran emerged victorious, are invalid. "McDaniel clearly won the runoff by 25,000 votes," his attorney said Monday. 
  • A ceasefire is taking place in the Gaza Strip. Allegedly. Again. The three-day killing moratorium went into effect Tuesday morning. 
  • Technology to start experimenting with artificial wombs exists, but legal and ethical qualms could keep human trials in the distant future. 
  • The FDA will begin mulling whether "sugars" and "added sugars" need separate slots on nutrition labels. 
  • Representatives from dozens of big U.S. corporations are in D.C. today to announce and discuss business investments in Africa and push for changes to U.S.-Africa trade deals. 

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Gluten-Free Food Labeling Rule Kicks In

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (344)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    The FDA will begin mulling whether "sugars" and "added sugars" need separate slots on nutrition labels.

    They go right to your label's hips.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Hello.

      "Representatives from dozens of big U.S. corporations are in D.C. today to announce and discuss business investments in Africa and push for changes to U.S.-Africa trade deals."

      You pay me now! says China.

      What did the Chinese businessman say to the American? "High five! On the side! Down low...too SLOW!"

      Ok. Enough of that.

    2. gaijin   11 years ago

      I think they need to separately label sugars that are left handed from those that are right...The Chiral Transparency Act of 14 can ban discriminination based on homo or hetero chirality.

      1. Zeb   11 years ago

        Aren't all biologically produced sugars right handed?

        1. gaijin   11 years ago

          On this world perhaps!

  2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Technology to start experimenting with artificial wombs exists, but legal and ethical qualms could keep human trials in the distant future.

    Helloooooooooo new abortion debate.

    1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

      This should do a pretty good job of ending the debate.

      1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

        My artificial womb, my choice!

        1. Brandon   11 years ago

          You didn't build that!

      2. mad.casual   11 years ago

        This should do a pretty good job of ending the debate.

        Ending? One?

        Abortion, eugenics, forced sterilization, wardship, child welfare... I don't see it ending any of them.

        Hell, some of them, with the advent of artificial wombs, make me want to adopt some statist solutions to fix the broken statist solutions we already have.

    2. mr lizard   11 years ago

      When our future reptile overlords launched the war on women they didn't have this in mind.

    3. db   11 years ago

      Leave it to the Patriarchy to steal the last natural privilege of the Woman: the right to conceive and abort. Installing artificial wombs in men will now complete the subjugation of the female and the corruption of the holy sacrament of termination.

    4. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

      If you have a Constitutional right to evict a fetus by killing it, why don't you have a Constitutional right to evict a fetus into an artificial womb?

      I don't see how artificial wombs can be subjected to an undue burden by being barred by legal and ethical qualms.

  3. Slammer   11 years ago

    Technology to start experimenting with artificial wombs exists, but legal and ethical qualms could keep human trials in the distant future.

    But abortion's all good

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      Between the two, putting your baby in artificial womb would be overwhelmingly the lesser evil, despite the Brave New Worldish overtones. Better machine-raised than dead.

      1. gaijin   11 years ago

        putting your baby in artificial womb

        And by this you mean sexbots?

        1. Libertarian   11 years ago

          Um, how WOULD artificial insemination work, anyway? Just curious. Just curious.

      2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

        They're probably afraid the kids will end up like Harry Harlow subjects.

      3. robc   11 years ago

        Proggies should love it, after all, the village will have to raise the child.

      4. waffles   11 years ago

        The Brave New World crossed my mind too. Huxley won for most accurate distopia novel of the 20th century.

        1. robc   11 years ago

          I think 1984 is more accurate.

          And Harrison Bergeron probably beats both, although it isnt a novel, so I guess is disqualified.

          Atlas Shrugged is pretty damn on target too.

          1. kinnath   11 years ago

            It's been 40 years since I read them both, so I have trouble keeping Brave New World and 1984 totally separate in my mind.

            I've come to treat them as two different eye-witnesses to the same catastrophe.

            1. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

              Here's an entertaining 60-second comparison between BNW and 1984.

              Amusing Ourselves to Death

              1. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

                It's pretty much a graphic illustration of Sudden's post below.

          2. Sudden   11 years ago

            I agree with Neil Postman on Huxley having a more accurate read than Orwell. Behold:

            "Orwell warns that we will be overcome by an externally imposed oppression. But in Huxley's vision, no Big Brother is required to deprive people of their autonomy, maturity and history. As he saw it, people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think.

            What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.

            Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism.

            Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance.

            Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy.

            As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite capacity for distractions." In 1984, Huxley added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us."

            1. Slammer   11 years ago

              TL;DR was txting

        2. Rhywun   11 years ago

          "I'm a Delta, and I'm happy!"

        3. entropy_factor   11 years ago

          Brave New World is more accurate. We are distracted by mindless shit- a sensory overload so we don't see the true machine at work

          1. BigT   11 years ago

            I thought Atlas Shrugged was a documentary.

            1. Protagoronus   11 years ago

              If it was a documentary, the actors would not keep changing in the sequels.

              1. Sudden   11 years ago

                Zing

          2. Rhywun   11 years ago

            Not to mention we're about two years away from birth control in the water.

    2. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

      Nothing will turn feminists off abortion faster than realizing that men are about to have that right too.

      1. #   11 years ago

        I really am looking forward to how feminists repond to the eventual male pill, whenever it comes out. Something tells me they are not going to like it.

        1. Redmanfms   11 years ago

          "How dare you take away MY RIGHT!!11!1!1!11 to trap a man by lying about getting pregnant."

          /jezebel

  4. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

    "Why should we refuse the charms of the soil to those at the end of their lives?

    A hospital in the French city of Clermont-Ferrand is to open a wine bar where terminally ill patients will be able to enjoy a "medically-supervised" glass or two with their families.

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Let them get too drunk to remember that they're dying.

    2. Game of Thrones fan   11 years ago

      What's next? Prostitutes and cocaine for the dying? Assisted SUICIDE?

      #slipperyslope

      1. Rich   11 years ago

        Welcome to the Monkey House

    3. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      You mean they weren't allowed wine before? In *France*?

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

        My question as well.

      2. Dweebston   11 years ago

        Don't be glib about our froggy friends. They're known for many things other than wine, like regular car-torching riots and their failing socialist welfare state.

  5. BilboTeabaggins   11 years ago

    So are we still cool with Rand Paul now that he has realized he needs jew gold to run for president?

    1. gaijin   11 years ago

      he has realized he needs jew gold to run for president?

      what does that even mean?

      1. BilboTeabaggins   11 years ago

        He is now denying that he ever called for an end to sending our money to fund the Israeli butchers.

        1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

          The Kosher Cattle Processors association never got US subsidy.

        2. robc   11 years ago

          As I said yesterday, he was technically correct, as his budget proposal was never a legislative proposal.

          But its a really lame form of technically correct.

        3. wareagle   11 years ago

          oh, good; Joo-hate to start the day. Lot of truth in what Netanyahu has repeatedly said: if Palestinians lay down their weapons, there will be peace; if Israelis do, there will be no Israel.

          1. WTF   11 years ago

            You believe those crafty lying JOOOS? Those are just more JOO lies and propaganda against the peaceful Palestinians.

            1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

              Charming race card playing guys, did not know you were dealers.

              1. Citizen Nothing   11 years ago

                Look, Bo. You gotta either hate the Joos or the A-Rabs. Make up your fucking mind.

                1. entropy_factor   11 years ago

                  HATE SOMEONE, RIGHT NOW!

                2. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

                  Bo made up his mind. He's just crafty enough to not come out and openly blame teh joooos.

                3. Idle Hands   11 years ago

                  What the fuck are you talking about? The Joos/A-Rab is not the issue here, Dude. I'm talking about drawing a line in the sand, Dude. Across this line, you do not ? also, Dude, "A-Rab" is not the preferred nomenclature. Towel-Head, please.

                4. Sudden   11 years ago

                  I'm Anti-Semitic, and fortunately that covers both peoples in theory.

              2. WTF   11 years ago

                Race card? What fucking drugs are you on where religion is a race? You really are a tedious dick.

                1. Jordan   11 years ago

                  Race card? What fucking drugs are you on where religion is a race? You really are a tedious dick.

                  Speaking of tedious...

                  You understood his point. Calling someone an anti-Semite for not wanting to support Israel is just as idiotic and tiresome as calling someone racist for not supporting affirmative action or some other pet issue.

                  1. WTF   11 years ago

                    Speaking of tedious, all right, the issue is not failing to support Israel, the issue is drawing an idiotic moral equivalence between the Israelis and Palestinians.

                    1. Jordan   11 years ago

                      And where is this moral equivalence? It's funny how so many supposed "small government" types aren't willing to even countenance the thought that perhaps governments behave badly during wartime. It's all about the TEAM. Someone criticized Israel? Shout them down!

                    2. WTF   11 years ago

                      Sure, that's exactly it. No one here has ever gone the route that the Israelis are just as bad and equally at fault. Maybe you haven't been around for the majority of shit-flinging that's taken place.

                    3. Zeb   11 years ago

                      The lack of any nuance does get tiresome. Yes, Israel has a right to defend itself. And the Palestinian rocket attacks are pretty indefensible. That doesn't mean that everything Israel does is necessary and beyond reproach or that it isn't tragic when innocent Palestinians are killed.
                      There is a sort of moral equivalence between most Israeli people and most Palestinian Arab people in that most of them are just people trying to live their lives. That's why war is awful and why people should draw attention to the awful things that necessarily happen in wars.

          2. Juice   11 years ago

            if Palestinians lay down their weapons, there will be peace**

            **bulldozing of houses, checkpoints, and concrete walls notwithstanding

        4. Rhywun   11 years ago

          He is now denying that he ever called for an end to sending our money to fund the Israeli butchers.

          I.e. he is a politician?

      2. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        *shrugs*

        I have no idea.

    2. waffles   11 years ago

      I don't want to fund the Israel but I understand that if one wants to work in government you cannot be against giving all the money and guns to Israel. Meh. Decidedly meh.

      1. Rhywun   11 years ago

        One could simply advocate for ending all foreign aid and be done with it.

        1. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

          Worked great for Ron.

          1. WTF   11 years ago

            I don't think it actually worked against Ron; he had other issues. I really don't think too many Americans among the voting public are highly in favor of funding shit for other countries.

          2. Rhywun   11 years ago

            Well, that's America's fault. We don't like principles.

        2. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

          Maybe he would like for this not to be conflated with ending aid to Israel specifically.

          1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

            THIS. And of course it would be.

    3. wwhorton   11 years ago

      "Jew gold."

      Really, dude? Are we still doing that? I thought we'd gotten all the poo-flinging out of our collective systems and could move on to rational, adult discussion.

    4. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

      This whole thread reminds me of Dante and Randall talking at the counter while Jay is outside singing "put that shit in my hand..."

      I am Silent Bob in this scenario.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    A ceasefire is taking place in the Gaza Strip. Allegedly. Again. The three-day killing moratorium went into effect Tuesday morning.

    Three days crammed into one morning.

    1. Old Man With Candy   11 years ago

      I'm pissed- I took the under on 90 minutes.

      1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

        If only Intrade had the balls to tell the US to fuck off.

  7. Slammer   11 years ago

    Hero cop wins NYPD 'Combat Cross', celebrates by assaulting female neighbor

    "Sometimes I'm a good guy, but sometimes I'm a bad guy,"

    Officer Eugene Donnelly, 27, was charged Monday with burglary and assault for allegedly busting down the door of the frightened woman's apartment in the Woodlawn section of The Bronx at 5:30 a.m. June 11, and punching her repeatedly as she lay in her bed, sources said.

    The investigation wrapped up Monday morning, and he was arraigned on charges of burglary, assault, criminal trespass and harassment.

    Donnelly was released on his own recognizance Monday.

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      Released on his own recognizance, just like a peasant "civilian" would be.

      1. WTF   11 years ago

        Maybe he just wasn't trained not to bust into his neighbor's house in a drunken rage and beat the shit out of her.

        1. Chinny Chin Chin   11 years ago

          Thank FSM he made it home safely.

    2. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Amazingly they released his name.

      1. Rhywun   11 years ago

        And they put scare quotes around "hero". Must be an op-ed. The Post is the most cop-sucking paper in NYC.

    3. Drake   11 years ago

      I hope he said it in a Tony Montana voice.

      1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

        "First you get the meal, then you get the booze... then, you get the women!"

        1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

          crap. "Medal", not meal.

          1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

            i was ok with meal.

    4. Swiss Servator, spare a franc?   11 years ago

      "Combat Cross"?! WTF?

      You want "combat" join the Armed Forces.

      I want to cram a CAB down this guys throat.

      1. WTF   11 years ago

        That's a good point, I actually missed that little tidbit. Why the fuck would there even be such an award for a cop? They are not soldiers in combat, and damn shouldn't be acting as though they are. The fact that this shit is celebrated shows just how bad things have gotten.

        1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

          They should have a permanant dock in pay every time they 'interact' with members of the public. After three years, they'd be paying to be cops. And the pension problem would fix itself.

        2. Jerryskids   11 years ago

          The Police Combat Cross is awarded to police officers who, "having received Honorable Mention awards, successfully and intelligently perform an act of extraordinary heroism while engaged in personal combat with an armed adversary under circumstances of imminent personal hazard to life".

          They all perform extraordinary acts of heroism merely by making sure they get home safely and shooting a dog armed with teeth and a snarl qualifies for that last part, but I defy you to find one who fits the intelligence criteria. Hell, this guy got a gold star from the teacher on account of how smart he is and look how smart he acts compared to, say, a moderately well-behaved chimpanzee.

          1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

            I thought police departments rejected cops who were too smart.

    5. Dweebston   11 years ago

      stripped of his gun and badge and put on modified duty.

      "Modified duty" had better involve playing assailant dummy with the police dogs, without the suit.

  8. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    I'll have to go vote for Amash today... one of the few times I vote and don't mind the choices.

    1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

      Yeah, I'd be happy to vote for someone like Amash.

      Oooh, but I get to vote for Scott Brown or Jeanne Shaheen later this year!

      1. Citizen Nothing   11 years ago

        There's a Libertarian in that race, no?

        1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

          I hope so, or I'm leaving it blank.

      2. Drake   11 years ago

        Brown won the primary?

        My dream of a moving to libertarian NH someday is fading.

        1. Citizen Nothing   11 years ago

          I've said it before, I'll say it again: Free State my ass.

          1. wwhorton   11 years ago

            I mean, good luck with all that shit, but I'll believe it's a "Free State" when you can buy liquor at a liquor store, not an ABC.

            1. Rhywun   11 years ago

              NY has private liquor stores - Free State! Free State!

              1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

                I used to work two floors below the Liquor Control Board... those 'private' stores are two steps shy of quangos with the amount of interference they get.

          2. waffles   11 years ago

            Looks like they've chosen the latter of "Live Free or Die".

          3. Zeb   11 years ago

            Again, no one is claiming that it is a free state now.
            I still think that with low population and a large legislature, we're in a better position than most states.

        2. Collegiate Inspector   11 years ago

          Drake, are you in Jersey?

          1. Drake   11 years ago

            Yes - but I can dream of freedom.

            1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

              isn't that against the law in Jersey?

        3. Zeb   11 years ago

          NH primaries aren't until September.

    2. Collegiate Inspector   11 years ago

      What's the vibe in your district? Are you feeling confident or nervous about Justin's chances?

      1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

        Feeling good - at least based on the yard sign numbers - and the work of Amash's ground game. Yesterday each door in our neighborhood had a reminder to vote for Amash on Tuesday.

        Nothing from the Ellis camp - his staff/workers never even went door-to-door, unlike Amash's.

        1. Collegiate Inspector   11 years ago

          This is what I like to hear. Candidates have got to run like they're scared. No one wants to end up like Mike Castle from Delaware.

          1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

            Yes. And more confirmation Amash isn't an idiot.

  9. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

    Samuel Beckett Motivational Cat Posters

    1. Warty   11 years ago

      All of them are my favorite.

      1. WTF   11 years ago

        Yes

        1. Citizen Nothing   11 years ago

          Oh, yes.

    2. Almanian - just....Almanian   11 years ago

      Yes!

    3. Juice   11 years ago

      Best one:
      http://beckittns.tumblr.com/post/90562771338

  10. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

    Israeli Destruction of School Questioned

    "An examination of an Israeli barrage that put a line of at least 10 shells through a United Nations school sheltering displaced Palestinians here last week suggests that Israeli troops paid little heed to warnings to safeguard such sites and may have unleashed weapons inappropriate for urban areas despite rising alarm over civilian deaths.

    Inspection of the damage, a preliminary United Nations review that collected 30 pieces of shrapnel, and interviews with two dozen witnesses indicate that the predawn strikes on Wednesday, July 30, that killed 21 people at the school, in the crowded Jabaliya refugee camp, were likely to have come from heavy artillery not designed for precision use."

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08......html?_r=0

    1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

      Commentary on School Destruction from Slate's Saletan

      "If you see Israel as a bully, the Jabaliya incident looks like a massacre, one of many deliberate strikes on civilian targets. If you see Israel as inherently moral?the world's only Jewish state, democratic, besieged, and acting in self-defense?the natural inference is that somebody else, no doubt Hamas, must be responsible for the error. But the evidence suggests that the truth may lie in between: Any civilized country could commit such an atrocity. That doesn't make it any less an atrocity. In fact, it makes the atrocity even more disturbing."

      http://www.slate.com/articles/.....a_u_n.html

      1. robc   11 years ago

        Im not sure what that last sentence means.

        1. Slammer   11 years ago

          I wonder if Slate thinks that applies to Obama's drone strikes?

        2. Ted S.   11 years ago

          Double standards. We should excuse atrocities from Hamas because we know they're unciviized.

          1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

            The whole "conflict" seems to be a exercise in idiocy. It's only going to end when one wipes the other off the planet. In the meantime our gov. should stop wasting time and money trying to solve something that will never be solved peacefully and at the same time arming the participants.

            1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

              On second thought; every minute they spend contemplating how they will solve the problem inevitable fucking things up worse than they are there, means one less minute they will try and "solve" problems here inevitable fucking things up worse than they are here.

          2. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

            I think the idea is that its more disturbing to see how a country that is otherwise quite 'liberal' can work itself into doing such things.

            1. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

              What, firing on facilities used to store weapons and attack their troops is something that just isn't done in polite circles?

      2. Juice   11 years ago

        If you see Israel as inherently moral?the world's only Jewish state

        What's moral about a Jewish state? What's good about any state based on a religion?

    2. Ivan Pike   11 years ago

      heavy artillery not designed for precision use.

      You know who else used artillery not designed for precision use?

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        Napolean Bonaparte?

        1. WTF   11 years ago

          Genghis Khan?

        2. Ivan Pike   11 years ago

          God fights on the side with the best artillery.
          Napoleon Bonaparte

      2. Almanian - just....Almanian   11 years ago

        George Washington?

      3. Idle Hands   11 years ago

        USA at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

        1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

          I guess it would have been easier/more relevant to say Truman.

      4. entropy_factor   11 years ago

        General ButtNaked?

      5. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

        John Holmes?

    3. Idle Hands   11 years ago

      I'm so tired of all of this, we should do whats right and nuke the entire site from orbit just to be sure. Why can't they both be assholes? Why does one side have to right and the other wrong? Why do we have to defend Israel? Why do we have to defend Hamas? just make it stop.

      1. Drake   11 years ago

        Why do I have to care?

        1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

          Why do I have to talk rhetorically?

          1. WTF   11 years ago

            What if we all started writing like Judge Napolitano?

            1. entropy_factor   11 years ago

              What if we didn't?

              1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

                I'd be happier, I don't like unanswered questions in my comments.

            2. Slammer   11 years ago

              "What if they held a war and nobody came, man?"

              1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

                "What if they held a war and nobody came, man?"

                We declare victory, annex the territory, and move on to the next.

      2. wareagle   11 years ago

        which of the two sides has the power to make it stop. If one stopped firing, what would happen? See if you notice any difference in potential outcome based on which did the stopping.

        1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

          The thing is one side will never stop as it is a foil they use to keep their populations anger focused on a group of people that are "over there" rather than the ones that are robbing them blind and lording over them.

          1. wareagle   11 years ago

            you asked why one side has to be right and the other wrong. I'm sure Israel can be nasty if it has to, but as your subsequent post says, one side seems to need perpetual hostility more than the other. I find the one that needs it worse than the other, but that's just me.

            1. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

              But. but Joooooooozzzzz!!1!1!

            2. Juice   11 years ago

              one side seems to need perpetual hostility more than the other

              Man, if you don't see the Palestinians as a necessary boogy man for the Israeli state, then I can't help you.

      3. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

        Why not just the the parties fight among themselves?

        Why does the US have to be involved?

        Why do Americans insist that that the US is the indispensable nation that must inject itself in every conflict?

    4. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

      Well, we know that Hamas was storing weapons in UN schools, and firing on Israelis from UN schools. I wouldn't assume that Hamas hadn't made that school a legitimate target.

  11. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Overkill: Renters "bomb" fleas, set Muskegon-area house on fire

    The home in the 700 block of East Giles Road sustained an estimated $20,000 in damage after renters staying at the home ignited 16 flea bombs, said Muskegon Township Fire Chief Dave E. Glotzbach.

    The gas propellant used in the bombs was ignited by a pilot light on a gas water heater in the basement, he said.

    "More's not always better," Glotzbach said, explaining that four to six bombs would have been sufficient. "They were upstairs, they were downstairs."

    1. gimmeasammich   11 years ago

      I guess the Great Mutato finally took it one step too far.

    2. Obama's Buttplug   11 years ago

      With products like Frontline, who the fuck needs to flea bomb their house?

      1. jmomls   11 years ago

        Is Frontline approved for human use? Because after your cat and/or dog get Frontlined, those fleas are going to want to bite something...or rather, some ONE. E.g., you.

        So you are the f*ck who needs flea bombs, genius.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Meanwhile in Mississippi, state Sen. Chris McDaniel is claiming that results of the GOP's June primary, in which Sen. Thad Cochran emerged victorious, are invalid.

    Isn't his operative's claiming the same of the senator's wife what lost him the primary in the first place?

    1. Swiss Servator, spare a franc?   11 years ago

      *narrows gaze*

    2. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

      They've supposedly identified thousands of votes that were cast illegally (Dem voters who had already voted in the Dem primary).

      If true, they've got a good case.

      One that will be ignored by the Republican Party, and won't be remedied by the courts until sometime long after the election is held.

  13. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

    University President Takes $90,000 Pay Cut to Give a Raise to His Minimum Wage Workers

    http://www.slate.com/blogs/the....._wage.html

    1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

      So the poor guy is only working for $260k?

      1. Ivan Pike   11 years ago

        So the poor guy is only working for $260k?

        Plus benefits.

    2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

      It's a write-off.

      1. Old Man With Candy   11 years ago

        You don't even know what a write off is!

        1. Steve G   11 years ago

          Damn you!

        2. gaijin   11 years ago

          You don't even know what a write off is!

          Is it some sort of literary battle, like Iron Chef for english majors?

          1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

            Today's secret ingredient is - Flan.

        3. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

          But they do, and they're the ones writing it off.

      2. Steve G   11 years ago

        Obligatory
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEL65gywwHQ

      3. Ted S.   11 years ago

        And a dessert topping.

    3. Brian D   11 years ago

      A $3/hr raise x 40hrs x 52 weeks = $6240 per year.

      $90,000 / $6240 = 14.423 blah blah blah.

      So he gave 14 full time minimum wage employees a $3/hr raise. I wonder how the people who make $8.25/hr feel now.

    4. Libertarian   11 years ago

      I'm against a min wage as much as the next guy, but as misguided as this guy is, he put his money where his mouth is. And he gave up a huge part of his salary -- I wouldn't give away $90K if I were making a million bucks a year.

      1. Rhywun   11 years ago

        he put his the taxpayers' money where his mouth is

        Kentucky State University

        1. perlhaqr   11 years ago

          His salary is paid with tax money, yes, but he still voluntarily reduced the amount he was getting.

    5. wwhorton   11 years ago

      "My whole thing is I don't need to work,"...

      "...as it will reportedly remain in place, and apply to new hires, even after Burse's tenure at the school is over.

      Not to take anything away from the guy, but we can establish from the article that dude "doesn't need to work", which after an academic admin career culminating in a $350k paycheck is probably true, and the pay raise will extend beyond his year-long stint, meaning that the cut isn't actually paying for the raises. So...what exactly did he do again?

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        He bought publicity.

        1. Swiss Servator, spare a franc?   11 years ago

          Or a modern version of an indulgence.

          1. WTF   11 years ago

            Yes, he paid his penance for being part of "the 1%".

    6. Brett L   11 years ago

      Huh. The state of Florida caps state pay to any employee, including university presidents at, I believe, $250k/year. Additional compensation has to come from private sources, usually the University foundation. I wonder if he has a similar deal.

  14. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Executive directives ? and misdirection

    To be pedantic (I think I'm supposed to say first that I hate to be pedantic, but I'm a professor, and that would be a lie), this is both true and hugely misleading. It is true that President Obama has issued fewer executive orders both in absolute terms, and on an order-per-year basis, than most of his recent or even recent-ish predecessors. It's also true that executive orders can matter greatly, as with Obama's expansion of protections for the employees of federal contractors.

    And yet to equate executive orders (a formal type of presidential directive) with executive powers, as the White House and its allies seek to do, is to misdirect ? to hope that the hand will be quicker than the eye. As Philip Bump has put it, the fuss is about executive actions more broadly. While Obama issued only 20 executive orders in 2013 (the lowest single-year total in more than a century), that same year he issued 41 presidential memoranda to the heads of departments and agencies, along with nine additional presidential "determinations" designed to serve as the basis for bureaucratic behavior.

  15. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Prohibitive frontrunner for best Kim Jong Un photo of 2014.

    1. Slammer   11 years ago

      My god, look at the zombie expression on the worker next to him. North Korea really is the world's longest ongoing holocaust. It's heart-breaking.

      1. Drake   11 years ago

        I don't think I want to know what's coming out of that pipe.

        1. Libertarian   11 years ago

          Apparently Soylent Green has artificial color added after this point in the processing.

        2. Old Man With Candy   11 years ago

          Brown 25.

      2. thom   11 years ago

        You can see it in his eyes. He's terrified of making one wrong move.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

          He'll be shot for not smiling

        2. mad.casual   11 years ago

          It's like a scene from a mob film where the Don is laughing but everyone else is glancing sideways at each other.

          Like KJU liquidated a snitch and is squirting his remains into the drum.

    2. Rhywun   11 years ago

      Twitter blocked, is there a link to just pic?

      1. Slammer   11 years ago

        Here

        1. Rhywun   11 years ago

          Also doesn't work. Rats 🙁

          1. Sudden   11 years ago

            Your work computer probably opted to disable searching for things that look like fecal matter. Care to explain why that is?

    3. db   11 years ago

      Caption:

      "Look at that! Wow, I just turned your whole family into pudding! Yum!"

  16. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    ...several other incumbents?including Reps. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) and Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.)?are predicted to keep their seats.

    If these are primaries, isn't that true regardless?

    1. jmomls   11 years ago

      Uh, no, because if they lose the primary, they're done.

      They're in the "seat" until the session is over.

  17. Slammer   11 years ago

    Obama's birthday card...Not a cult!

    1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

      Dammit, how many shopping days until Obamass? I got an artificial Obamass tree this year.

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        Obamass? Isn't that Michelle's posterior?

      2. Libertarian   11 years ago

        RELAX! Libertarians celebrate Obamass at Festivus -- it just adds zest to the Airing of the Grievances.

        1. Sudden   11 years ago

          Can we burn in effigy to keep warm?

  18. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

    DeBlasio Finds Creating New Government Programs Can Cause All Kinds of Problems (Who'd of thunk it?)

    "The biblical story of Noah's Ark will be taught, without mention of who told Noah to build it. Challah, the Jewish bread eaten on the Sabbath, will be baked, but no blessings said over it. Some crucifixes will be removed, but others left hanging.

    These are the kinds of church-state gymnastics that New York City and some religious schools are performing as Mayor Bill de Blasio expands government-funded prekindergarten. Because of inadequate public school capacity, the de Blasio administration has been urging religious schools and community organizations to consider hosting the added programs."

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08.....ottom-well

    1. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

      Don't worry. The kids will it figure out: Noah built the Ark because scientific consensus conclusively demonstrated that human sinfulness would cause global climate change. The time for debate was over, but only Noah took action. Too bad about everybody else.

    2. Juice   11 years ago

      Wasn't this one of his big agenda items? And he didn't have a good plan? Or a plan at all? He just said, "We need XYZ. Vote for me because my intention is to create XYZ." No plan. No determination if his dream was even possible without a lot of other changes beforehand.

  19. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    Peter Hitchens on "The Foul Tornado" - not the Sharknado, World War One.

    "If they could hold a parade of the twentieth century's war dead, how long would it take these dark, hollow-eyed battalions to march, night and day, trundling their enormous guns behind them, through the once-tranquil capitals that ordained their deaths? Could anyone bear to watch?"

    http://spectator.org/articles/59563/foul-tornado

  20. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Peaches are being sold with tiny knickers on them in China

    According to Kotaku, the special-edition peaches on a bed of satin are being sold ahead of Qixi Festival, a romantic celebration sometimes known as Chinese Valentine's Day.

    The arse-peaches apparently originated with a fruit shop owner in Nanjing, China News reports. They are put together using "customised underwear from a well-known lingerie brand".

    They cost 498 yuan, or about ?60, for a pack of nine. Expensive peaches, or cheap arses? You decide.

  21. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

    I hate humanity, part 7,573

    An Australian couple is accused of rejecting their Down's Syndrome son born to a Thai surrogate, and taking only his healthy sister.

    They deny even knowing of his existence.

    Now it's revealed the father has three convictions for sexually assaulting little girls. The Thai surrogate wants the little girl back

    Urgh

  22. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Raccsitisiiiisstt!

    Americans face kale shortages after supplier ran out of seeds

    The iron-rich but bitter leafy green has become the latest so-called superfood among health-conscious Americans, found in salads as a side dish and even in chip form. But now those who love the trendy veggie are in for price increases, according to reports.

    A major Australian kale supplier, Bejo Seeds, ran out of the seeds needed to grow the plants, halting supplies to farmers worldwide.

    1. Zeb   11 years ago

      Well, I have plenty of kale.

      Does that make me racist?

    2. Rich   11 years ago

      Raccsitisiiiisstt!

      Pretty sure you have kale confused with colored greens.

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        Isn't that Collard?

        1. waffles   11 years ago

          *Collerd

          1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

            Sorry, waffles, that spelling only comes up with a null entry.

        2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          Mmmm, collard greens cooked with pork fat. With some cornbread, I hope.

          1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

            I'm not a fan of cornbread, probably because I always end up with super-dry loaves.

            1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

              You're doing it wrong. First of all, "loaves?" One does not cook "loaves" of cornbread.

              Iron is key, as is buttermilk.

            2. Jerryskids   11 years ago

              You're making the batter too dry, perhaps not enough egg and buttermilk - it should be like cake batter. Throw a can of creamed corn in the batter (add chopped jalepenos for some zing), add a teaspoon of baking powder for extra rise, let it sit for a few minutes before you pour it in your pre-heated cast-iron skillet. And make sure your pre-heated skillet has about half a cup of lard in it - you want a big puddle of grease on top of the batter when you're done pouring it in so you wind up with almost deep-fried corn bread, a crispy, greasy, golden-brown rind on your corn cake.

              1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

                you're making me hungry...

              2. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

                That sounds like a terrible waste.

                1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                  Think of it as baked and fried polenta. In fact, I'm going to start marketing it that way.

              3. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                It could also be mixing it up too much. I can't remember what bad effects that has, but it's something that you're not supposed to do.

                I'm not in the MUST BE LARD camp, but I agree with the general concept of a goodly amount of fat.

              4. Elspeth Flashman   11 years ago

                I love cooking with lard. I only recently discovered it, and it goes in place of vegetable oil in so many good ways!

            3. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

              That's what the gravy is for.

              1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                I fucking love cornbread. It's one of those things that's hard to find made properly in restaurants, too, unless they have the appropriate Deep South bona fides. Or can fake it good.

                We have cast iron primarily for the purpose of making cornbread. Usually in a skillet, but my dad found me an old-style (i.e., shaped like sticks, not like corn or whatever) cornstick pan, which rules.

                1. Warty   11 years ago

                  Just don't put any fucking sugar in the cornbread. Gross.

                  1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                    Wait, that's legal? What the fuck is the point of the FDA?

                  2. Obama's Buttplug   11 years ago

                    ^^THIS^^

                    1. Obama's Buttplug   11 years ago

                      @ Warty, BTW.

      2. Atanarjuat   11 years ago

        That is awesome, but I'm unclear on whether it's an example of joe'z Law, RC'z Law, or just a classic John-ism.

        1. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

          RC'z Law, thanks. Johnism are exemplars, even paragons, of RC'z Law.

      3. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

        now who is being racist 😉

    3. Citizen Nothing   11 years ago

      I've got a whole bed of kale growing in the compound. I didn't realize that it would make me rich.

    4. The Tone Police   11 years ago

      Bitches love kale.

      1. Libertarian   11 years ago

        J.J.?

    5. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

      I don't think I had ever heard of kale before last fall.

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        What's odd is that we've been eating kale on occasion for a while--well before it became a thing. That's by virtue of getting random stuff in our farmers' market share.

        1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

          I wouldn't be surprised to find out that you've be selectively breeding kale over millennia.

          1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

            Kale, Kal-El?

      2. Brett L   11 years ago

        Eh. They used it as a decorative green for plating at a restaurant I worked at in the 90s. Nobody was expected to eat it.

    6. Rhywun   11 years ago

      Wake me up when The Obamas replace their arugula with it.

    7. Brett L   11 years ago

      Thanks be to God, I have a reason to keep that wretched vegetable off the grocery list.

    8. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

      Oh no! Just as kale chips are taking off.

  23. Almanian - just....Almanian   11 years ago

    "McDaniel clearly won the runoff by 25,000 votes," his attorney said Monday.

    As if we needed more proof that Rethuglifucks are suppressing the vote! Fuck!

    1. jmomls   11 years ago

      Actually, no, they were actually expanding the vote...by allowing people to vote more than once.

  24. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Apple Buybacks Pay Most Ever as CEOs Spend $211 Billion

    Spurred on by zero-percent interest rates and the highest cash balances on record, companies are plowing capital into the equity market to curb supply and buttress per-share earnings. While Scott Wren of Wells Fargo Advisors LLC says there are usually better things to do with capital, companies with the most repurchases have beat the S&P 500 during the bull market.

    "It's a low-quality way to increase your earnings and obviously I'd much rather see companies grow the business through revenue," Wren, the St. Louis-based senior equity strategist at Wells Fargo Advisors, said in a phone interview. "But when the economy's growing at 2 to 2.5 percent, you have to do what you can to keep the ball rolling."

  25. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Jonah Goldberg: WWI demons live

    "I believe it is no exaggeration," wrote sociologist Robert Nisbet, "to say that the West's first real experience with totalitarianism ? political absolutism extended into every possible area of culture and society, education, religion, industry, the arts, local community and family included, with a kind of terror always waiting in the wings ? came with the American war state under Woodrow Wilson."

    Wilson introduced domestic spying, censorship, violent political intimidation of opponents and economic statism into the American DNA. Pro-Wilson intellectuals celebrated the "social possibilities of war," in the words of John Dewey. By that they meant the ability to force Americans to, as Frederick Lewis Allen put it, "lay by our good-natured individualism and march in step." The enduring notion that experts could plan the economy from Washington was largely born in Wilson's "war socialism."

    1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

      Wouldn't much of that be applicable to the Lincoln administration during the Civil War? War is the health of the state.

      1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

        So, to continue with my weird "life imitates movies in my head" I picture MNG errr I mean Bo as the Skeksis Chamberlin. The creepy gelfling is obviously SF (Could be Epi) and the girl gelfling is Nicole, cause well...you know. Shrike is one of Chamberlin's lackeys. And of course I am that old mystic who gets fucked cause his counter part fell off a cliff.

    2. Chinny Chin Chin   11 years ago

      Fuck John Dewey. Seriously. It makes complete sense that he's the father of the US public school system.

    3. OldMexican   11 years ago

      Where is the "Like" button? I want to "Like" this article!

    4. Juice   11 years ago

      the West's first real experience with totalitarianism

      Louis XVI?

  26. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    A husband-and-wife couple enjoys mingling with gay-rights demonstrators, holding up hostile signs like "Sodomy is wrong" and "Support our tolerant agenda or we'll drive you out of business!"

    No, wait, if they did that the demonstrators would attack them.

    This husband and wife mingles with anti-abortion protesters with signs mocking the demonstrators, especially the white male ones. They don't seem to have held up mocking signs next to the black woman protesters.

    http://i100.independent.co.uk/.....l1wX46_uMx

    1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

      "Humor"

    2. perlhaqr   11 years ago

      I'm not sure I've seen any "gay-rights protestors" anywhere.

  27. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

    Yahoo wants you to feel sorry for this guy:

    Not so golden: Wealth gap lasting into retirement

    Kistler, a 63-year-old resident of Golden, Colorado, has been unable to build up a nest egg for himself and his wife with his modest salary at a nonprofit. He has saved little in a 401(k) over the past decade, after spending most of his working life self-employed. That puts him far behind many wealthier Americans approaching retirement.

    Fuck this guy.

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Why should we fuck the self-employed?

      1. waffles   11 years ago

        Because it's better than supporting a pimp.

    2. gaijin   11 years ago

      ^this

      That puts him far behind many wealthier Americans approaching retirement.

      And still ahead of 90% of the rest of the world's people.

    3. wwhorton   11 years ago

      Kistler, a 63-year-old resident of Golden, Colorado, has been unable to build up a nest egg for himself and his wife with his modest salary at a nonprofit. He has saved little in a 401(k) over the past decade, after spending most of his working life self-employed. That puts him far behind many wealthier Americans approaching retirement.

      ...yes, and? Was he enslaved by said non-profit? Shit, for that matter, when did he opt to cease self-employment and work for someone else? Ten years prior? It took me about two years of self-employment before I decided I'd rather be able to pay all my bills on time.

    4. robc   11 years ago

      I dont know how much he made, but I guarantee that if he had put 15% into retirement every year of his working life, he would be fine.

      He fucked himself.

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        The government did that for him.

        (Remember that the government forces the self-employed to pay both halves of the Social Security Ponzi scheme.)

        1. robc   11 years ago

          Everyone pays both halves.

          As someone who is self-employed and who has had employees, Im well aware of how it works. And trust me, my employees were paying both halves, they just didnt see it on the paycheck.

          1. robc   11 years ago

            Employees also pay the unemployment tax and for their health care coverage.

    5. Steve G   11 years ago

      He has saved little in a 401(k)

      Spotted the problem

    6. Libertarian   11 years ago

      "That puts him far behind many wealthier Americans approaching retirement."

      I would imagine that it puts him behind almost every single wealthier American, by definition.

    7. BigT   11 years ago

      He can simply live off the smug he built up working for non-profits. Problem...solved.

      1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

        Seriously. He chose to work there knowing the trade offs of doing so.

        Suck it up and keep working there longer.

    8. Rhywun   11 years ago

      Obviously, what is needed is a "retirement wage" - like a "living wage" but turned up to 11.

  28. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Egypt plans to dig new Suez Canal costing $4 billion

    Egypt plans to build a new Suez Canal alongside the existing 145-year-old historic waterway in a multi-billion dollar project aimed at expanding trade along the fastest shipping route between Europe and Asia.

    The Suez Canal earns Egypt about $5 billion a year in revenues, a vital source of hard currency for a country that has suffered a slump in tourism and foreign investment since its 2011 uprising.

    The new channel, part of a larger project to expand Suez port and shipping facilities, aims to raise Egypt's international profile and establish it as a major trade hub.

    1. Rich   11 years ago

      He said the total estimated cost of drilling the new channel would be about $4 billion and be completed in five years, though Egypt will strive to finish it within a more ambitious three-year deadline.

      Using, um, slaves again, are we?

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        Corvee labor.

        Use the correct euphemism.

        1. Swiss Servator, spare a franc?   11 years ago

          Corvee.

          1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

            Blarg. It's all frog-speak anyway.

    2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      They should dig it in the opposite direction and call it the Zeus Canal.

      1. Swiss Servator, spare a franc?   11 years ago

        You...I mean...that...

        *shakes head and walks away*

        1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          THE TRUTH HAS BEEN REVEALED! KNEEL BEFORE THE KING OF THE GODS! REVEL IN HIS ACCOMPLISHMENTS! BEHOLD THE CANAL!

          A god, a plan, a canal: Padoga.

      2. Drax the Destroyer   11 years ago

        Your joke is bad, and you should feel bad.

        1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          It's not a joke. I'm just taking the opportunity to point out to those that don't know that Suez is Zeus spelled backwards. Like Serutan is natures spelled backwards.

          1. Mercutio   11 years ago

            And Dog is God spelled backwards.

            1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

              I'm not familiar with any Dog Canals.

  29. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Grand Canyon investigating squirrel-kicking video

    Authorities are looking into a viral Internet video that shows a man kicking a squirrel off what appears to be the edge of the Grand Canyon.

    Park spokeswoman Kirby-Lynn Shedlowski said Monday that chances of finding the man are slim.

    She couldn't say whether the video was a hoax. But she says geographical features in it match part of the Grand Canyon. She says authorities have reached out to YouTube seeking more information.

    1. Bam!   11 years ago

      Gotta keep them out of the servers somehow.

    2. Zeb   11 years ago

      It's a fucking squirrel. This really requires an investigation?

    3. gaijin   11 years ago

      "Grand Canyon investigating..."

      Heck the big news is that the "Grand Canyon" has achieved sentience.

    4. Chinny Chin Chin   11 years ago

      "Help us YouTube. You're our only hope".

    5. OldMexican   11 years ago

      Park spokeswoman Kirby-Lynn Shedlowski said Monday that chances of finding the man [who kicked a squirrel off a cliff] are slim.

      Yes another crime that will go unpunished...

      ... uh, wait. A squirrel? Really?

      1. Citizen Nothing   11 years ago

        Let us not forget, Dude, that uh, kicking an arborious...mammal...off the Grand Canyon...that ain't legal either.

        1. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

          What are you, a fucking park ranger now?

        2. Atanarjuat   11 years ago

          ^lmao

        3. The DerpRider   11 years ago

          That squirrel is a bear. Which makes this not a crime, but an atrocity...

    6. Rhywun   11 years ago

      I hope they have the tiny little instruments they need to operate on it.

  30. Slammer   11 years ago

    What's worse? Reason squirrelz or Canadian squirrelz?

    1. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

      They're both pretty good barbecued

    2. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Screw the Quebeckers.

  31. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

    I kind of want to rant about how shitty Comcast is. Hooray for (almost) monopolies!

    1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

      I hate those assholes.

      I am in theory locked in for two years on a low price for tv and internet, and yet my bill is always slightly different every month.

      1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

        I don't have a contract, which is one of the few nice things about it. But they are making it incredibly difficult just to switch my automatic payments to my new credit card. Their website and automated phone system are both useless.

        1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

          Talking to an actual person, of course, is an option that will require a $5 fee.

          1. thom   11 years ago

            Maybe they'll wave the fee if you sign up for phone service!

          2. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

            The joys of unionized customer service.

      2. Atanarjuat   11 years ago

        yet my bill is always slightly different every month

        Maybe because of taxes? One thing I like about the Verizon bill is it has one section, plainly separated from the rest, that says in bold, Government Taxes & Fees. As opposed to the old landline bills which just included taxes and hid them with weird descriptions like "Interstate Access Fee". It's like they're saying "sorry guys, nothing we can do about this shit". Imagine if every transaction showed the deadweight loss to consumers caused by government.

        1. perlhaqr   11 years ago

          Ooooooooooh.

          Advertise your gasoline at the price minus taxes, and as "plus tax". Make people run their cards twice for it, so there's a clear charge for the "tax" part. I like it.

    2. Doctor Whom   11 years ago

      Where I used to live, city politicians congratulated themselves for denying RCN a franchise to compete with Comcast. Later, the sheeple asked why the city council wasn't taking a more protactive role in combating Comcast's monopoly. No, really.

      1. wwhorton   11 years ago

        City council politics are the most depressing, disheartening example of what local politics actually looks like. This is why I'm such a proponent of libertarianism at the local level. I mean, I know for a damn fact that the 5% of the people who pretended to give a shit about local politics one day three years ago aren't going to pay attention to anything these fuckers are doing between elections, so it's not like accountability is going to prevent abuse of questionable laws.

        1. The DerpRider   11 years ago

          I'm on our ZBA in my town and I vote to approve everything. The other board members hate me.

          1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

            Zoning is an abomination in of itself.

            1. perlhaqr   11 years ago

              Zoning drives me fucking crazy. In part at least because they feel perfectly justified in redefining terms.

              I had a Suburban that got plowed into from the rear by a drunk. I took the back glass out, hammered it straight, made a new bumper, and kept driving it.

              I got harassed by the zoning enforcers for having an inoperable vehicle. Because a vehicle that is missing glass is defined as "inoperable", despite the fact that it was registered, and I drove it to work every day. And the state motor vehicle code says nothing about side glass.

              So I cut out the parts of the body where the glass would have gone, and then it was magically not an "inoperative vehicle" any more.

              This sort of stupidity has actually worked in my favor before, though. Since I felt compelled to read the zoning code after this nonsense, I discovered that you are allowed to have inoperable vehicles on your property, but only inside of a garage. But the zoning code defines being under a carport as "inside of a garage", despite the fact that carports have no walls. So, I got a harassment letter from zoning about another project I had in the driveway (under the carport!) and called back to point out that it was under a carport, and therefore "inside a garage" according to the zoning rules. "Sir, I don't make the zoning rules, I just comply with the stupid things." The zoning enforcement drone was rather nonplussed that I'd used that line on him, but agreed that I was correct.

        2. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

          having been focused on local for the past 15 years I can guarantee that almost ALL of the violations of your rights occur at the most local level. I am subject to 7 local governments, and I am one of the lucky ones. Most are subject to 10 or more.

  32. wwhorton   11 years ago

    Could someone read that Gaza article for me? For reasons beyond my ken, the cutting-edge web designers at the AP decided on Palatino Fucking Linotype as a good body font. Apparently people were complaining about being able to read a full article without getting a splitting headache or something.

    1. wwhorton   11 years ago

      Oh, but I didn't miss this gem, emphasis mine:

      "The war broke out on July 8 when Israel launched airstrikes it said were in response to weeks of heavy rocket fire out of Hamas-controlled Gaza. It expanded the operation on July 17 by sending in ground forces in what it described as a mission to destroy a network of tunnels used to stage attacks."

      Seriously? Yeah, and WW2 broke out when American naval forces launched a vicious attack against Japan following some thing happening in Hawaii or something.

      1. waffles   11 years ago

        I remember WW2 as the war of American aggression too.

        1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          The aggression came in not surrendering immediately.

      2. Zeb   11 years ago

        Takes two to have a war, no?

  33. Rich   11 years ago

    The Union Street Guest House ... charges couples who book weddings at the venue $500 for every bad review posted online by their guests.

    If you take down the nasty review, you'll get your money back.

    That's the *Union Street Guest House* -- Ask for it by name!

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      I understand they've got a bunch of bad reviews anyway.

    2. Ted S.   11 years ago

      They're run by Yelp?

    3. waffles   11 years ago

      They got a lot of heat for this and have since retracted it. Really awfully stupid plan.

      1. wwhorton   11 years ago

        I mean, they had to have been aware of the Internet, right? Who thought this would be a good idea?

      2. Ted S.   11 years ago

        If they were in Europe, they'd be able to make everybody forget about it.

  34. Atanarjuat   11 years ago

    Representatives from dozens of big U.S. corporations are in D.C. today to announce and discuss business investments in Africa and push for changes to U.S.-Africa trade deals.

    I wish we could string up these traitors. A true economic patriot would give their money to the federal government to fix our crumbling infrastructure.

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      A true economic patriot would bomb the infrastructure, for the stimulus value.

      1. Libertarian   11 years ago

        Hmmm. Now that I think about it, I've never seen Ted and Paul Krugman together.........

    2. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

      They should also do their part to provide more jobs here for Americans. Central Americans, that is.

  35. OldMexican   11 years ago

    "McDaniel clearly won the runoff by 25,000 votes," his attorney said Monday.

    "I brought them all from the dead myself, so I should know!"

    Representatives from dozens of big U.S. corporations are in D.C. today to announce and discuss business investments in Africa and push for changes to U.S.-Africa trade deals.

    You can bet your sweet ass that the Left will criticize investment in Africa by big corporations by calling it "Neo-colonialism".

    Technology to start experimenting with artificial wombs exists, but legal and ethical qualms could keep human trials in the distant future.

    Ha! Legal and ethical qualms! Psha! I want one to start raising my army of atomic supermen!

  36. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Book: Obama ignored gun lobby's bid to help rid illegal guns after Newtown

    Choosing politics over policy, the Obama administration ignored a willingness by the gun lobby to help in the fight against illegal guns and gun violence following the 2012 Newtown, Conn., school shooting, likely missing any chance of a historic deal, according to a new book about the nation's war over the weapons.

    In "The Future of the Gun," New York Times bestselling author Frank Miniter reveals that two of the country's leading gun lobbies stood ready to work with the White House, but instead were pushed away by an administration that wrongly thought the country was on their side in banning assault weapons.

    whoops!

  37. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    This is some shocking news here:

    Almost No Teachers In District's Low-Performing Schools Considered 'Ineffective'

    In 2,382 teacher evaluations from 2011-12 to 2013-14, the district found only two teachers to be ineffective. The percentage of top-rated "highly effective" teachers has increased from 0 percent to 41.4 percent to 53.3 percent over the same period.

    Lansing School District Spokesman Bob Kolt and Superintendent Yvonne Caamul Canul did not respond to requests for comment.

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      Did their records keeper retire from the VA and pick up this job to supplement their pension?

    2. DJF   11 years ago

      Maybe its the students who are ineffective?

      1. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

        Everybody knows that the solution is to spend more money, especially on teacher salaries. If only they paid their effective teachers more, they would be effective.

  38. Scarecrow Repair   11 years ago

    Go ahead, load up the nutrition label with so much lard that it needs its own executive summary and either requires a magnifying glass to read or eliminates all small packages.

    1. jmomls   11 years ago

      Also, could they just tell you how many calories are in the ENTIRE package, rather than some tiny damn serving size to which no one adheres?

  39. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    Here's Why SpaceX Chose A Texas Site Near The Mexico Border For Its New Launch Site

    "Gov. Rick Perry announced an incentive package totaling more than $15 million Monday to close the deal" to locate the facility close to Brownsville, reported Paul O'Donnell in the Dallas Business Journal.

    But saving money wasn't the only reason SpaceX and CEO Elon Musk went for the Lone Star State. When it comes to blasting rocket into orbit, location matters.

    The southern tip of Texas ? and the southernmost point in the continental U.S. ? is closer to the Equator than Cape Canaveral in Florida. The closer a launch site is to the Equator, the more the rocket can take advantage of the Earth's rotation to pick up extra speed to achieve and remain in orbit.

    1. Drake   11 years ago

      Not for cheap immigrant aerospace engineers?

    2. Rhywun   11 years ago

      So... the bribe was unnecessary, right? I'm sure Elon will be refunding that money to the taxpayers any day now.

  40. DEG   11 years ago

    His Pestilence utters complete bullshit:

    In an interview with The Economist last week the President said when he brings up income inequality, he's not trying to "stir class resentment" like his political opponents say.

    "Feel free to keep your house in the Hamptons and your corporate jet ... I'm not concerned about how you're living," he said.

    1. Drake   11 years ago

      Holy shit! He really said we are free to keep our homes?

      1. thom   11 years ago

        The wealthy should be extremely grateful that he is allowing them to keep their property. Yet all he gets is criticism. Ingrates.

      2. Scarecrow Repair   11 years ago

        If you like your homes, you can keep them.

    2. Sevo   11 years ago

      "Feel free to keep your house in the Hamptons and your corporate jet ... I'm not concerned about how you're living," he said."

      Uh, oh...
      That sounds suspiciously like:
      "You can keep your house in the Hamptons..."

  41. Sevo   11 years ago

    (fingers of right hand touching forehead, gazing downward)
    Prediction: Huge increase in the number of homeless! Pity-press will be headlining bogus numbers!

    "New bipartisan legislation co-sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein would expand the definition of homelessness to reflect the education department's numbers and dramatically expand the number of children who qualify for federal homeless assistance, including supportive housing, food and mental health services."
    http://www.sfgate.com/default/.....668137.php

    1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

      You know who else was nearly homeless, penniless, and had to roam the streets working as a starving artist?

      1. Swiss Servator, spare a franc?   11 years ago

        Vincent Van Gogh?

        1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          If we ever have time travel, I intend to go into a niche practice, where I represent poor artists from the past and get them their just rewards. For a small percentage of the royalties. Less than fifty percent.

          1. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

            You could just let them know they're loved. Van Gogh seemed to appreciate it

            1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

              I'll show him tape of people pleasuring themselves in front of his paintings. You just know it's out there. See, I saw some of the people viewing Van Goghs at the Art Institute of Chicago, and I think, well, they were really into his art and may have stayed after hours to express their love.

            2. Rhywun   11 years ago

              Nu Who at its most ridiculously treacly. Barf.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      Look at all these homeless! They appeared overnight!

    3. Marshall Gill   11 years ago

      Are families who live packed in single rooms in residential hotels considered homeless?

      Are families with small homes considered "homeless"? Yes!

      1. Sevo   11 years ago

        Well, it's not a 'living home'! You can't live in the places those people are living!

      2. BigT   11 years ago

        Anything less than 20 rooms is a hovel. How can we call ourselves Mericans with people living in such squalor.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Friends in High Places

Charles Oliver | 7.4.2025 4:00 AM

The Fourth of July Is a Celebration of Freedom—From Government

John Stossel | 7.4.2025 12:01 AM

A Broad Ruling Against Trump's Immigration Policies Illustrates Alternatives to Universal Injunctions

Jacob Sullum | 7.3.2025 4:40 PM

Environmental Regulations Are Literally Baking Europeans to Death

Jack Nicastro | 7.3.2025 3:38 PM

Federal Prison Guards Allegedly Beat an Inmate to a Pulp. The Supreme Court Says He Can't Sue.

Billy Binion | 7.3.2025 2:48 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!