Rep. Polis Pulls Anti-Fracking Initiatives in Favor of Compromise


In May, we took note of Colorado Democratic Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking initiatives in his state, though he sees it more of a "local control" effort than anti-fracking. Initiatives he threw his weight and money behind were intended to increase regulation on fracking in his state and give municipalities the authority to introduce further restrictions.
His efforts ended up causing some rifts in the Democratic Party in Colorado, because the Democratic establishment there is not necessarily anti-fracking. Polis' push put him at odds with Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper and Sen. Mark Udall.
Today, Polis and Hickenlooper reached a compromise that will result in Polis pulling his initiatives in exchange for the creation of an advisory task force to recommend fracking regulations to the state's legislature, where stakeholders from all sides would give input.
On Hickenlooper's side, the state will drop a lawsuit against the town of Longmont. The town had passed its own ban on fracking. According to The Hill, industry representatives also agreed to drop two pro-fracking initiatives, one of which would have blocked towns like Longmont from receiving tax revenue from oil and gas development.
Rep. Polis put out a response on Facebook that read in part:
These immediate steps give me great hope that together we will forge a solution that works for all of Colorado. Given my renewed hope that my constituents will be able to shape the statewide fracking policy through the legislative process as soon as the next legislative session, I am withdrawing my financial support for the proposed ballot initiatives. To be clear, I am not giving up this fight, I will continue to push for greater health and safety for my constituents through every avenue available to me. My sincere hope is that the legislature will heed the concerns of thousands of Coloradans that have demanded reasonable safeguards from oil and gas development. I want to thank all the community organizers that have worked tirelessly to bring their concerns to the forefront and have demanded action on this important issue. There is still a great amount of work to be done, but today represents real progress.
There's a video of their joint press conference here.
As always, when reading about fracking fears, it helps to have Ron Bailey's "Top 5 Lies About Fracking" on hand to dispel some of the myths.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Oh, an "advisory task force"! Nice punt.
? Don't rock the boat, baby..?
"an advisory 'task force' to 'recommend' fracking regulations to the state's legislature, where 'stakeholders' from all sides would give 'input'
... Smoky-Back Room and Envelopes full of Money for Influence Peddling, not included! Because nothing says "cost-effective" regulation like a bunch of unelected appointees 'negotiating' in secret.
We can't just let an industry go unregulated? Without strings to pull and sticks to wield, how is government ever supposed to use scare-tactics and populist demagoguery effectively? Because "contaminated well water", and "earthquakes"... hell, *tap water on fire*.... we don't gin up this kind of bullshit for *nothing*
So speeches that play well in Boulder aren't very popular when you enact them into law? Who'd have thunk it?
Speeches that play well in Boulder aren't very popular with the parents whose work replenishes the trust funds in Boulder.
"His efforts ended up causing some rifts in the Democratic Party in Colorado, because the Democratic establishment there is not necessarily anti-fracking."
So they are the party of science!
Looks to me like Polis got everything he wanted.
The state will allow local regulation, and the state will adopt new restrictions.
Real nice "compromise", there. Still, the point was to get some new talking points out before they got their assess handed to them at the polls, so mission accomplished.
He wants "local" control since it's HIS location we're talking about. Too bad he doesn't want local control on anything else.
http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_.....t-his-weld