Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Fracking

Rep. Polis Pulls Anti-Fracking Initiatives in Favor of Compromise

Scott Shackford | 8.4.2014 4:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Congress
(Congress)
What would "Battlestar Galactica" be like without fracking?
Rep. Jared Polis

In May, we took note of Colorado Democratic Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking initiatives in his state, though he sees it more of a "local control" effort than anti-fracking. Initiatives he threw his weight and money behind were intended to increase regulation on fracking in his state and give municipalities the authority to introduce further restrictions.

His efforts ended up causing some rifts in the Democratic Party in Colorado, because the Democratic establishment there is not necessarily anti-fracking. Polis' push put him at odds with Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper and Sen. Mark Udall.

Today, Polis and Hickenlooper reached a compromise that will result in Polis pulling his initiatives in exchange for the creation of an advisory task force to recommend fracking regulations to the state's legislature, where stakeholders from all sides would give input.

On Hickenlooper's side, the state will drop a lawsuit against the town of Longmont. The town had passed its own ban on fracking. According to The Hill, industry representatives also agreed to drop two pro-fracking initiatives, one of which would have blocked towns like Longmont from receiving tax revenue from oil and gas development.

Rep. Polis put out a response on Facebook that read in part:

These immediate steps give me great hope that together we will forge a solution that works for all of Colorado. Given my renewed hope that my constituents will be able to shape the statewide fracking policy through the legislative process as soon as the next legislative session, I am withdrawing my financial support for the proposed ballot initiatives. To be clear, I am not giving up this fight, I will continue to push for greater health and safety for my constituents through every avenue available to me. My sincere hope is that the legislature will heed the concerns of thousands of Coloradans that have demanded reasonable safeguards from oil and gas development. I want to thank all the community organizers that have worked tirelessly to bring their concerns to the forefront and have demanded action on this important issue. There is still a great amount of work to be done, but today represents real progress.

There's a video of their joint press conference here.

As always, when reading about fracking fears, it helps to have Ron Bailey's "Top 5 Lies About Fracking" on hand to dispel some of the myths.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Bill Maher Assails Speech Police Who 'Lay in Wait' on the Internet

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

FrackingColoradoNatural GasBallot InitiativesState Governments
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (8)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

    Oh, an "advisory task force"! Nice punt.

  2. Pathogen   11 years ago

    ? Don't rock the boat, baby..?

  3. GILMORE   11 years ago

    "an advisory 'task force' to 'recommend' fracking regulations to the state's legislature, where 'stakeholders' from all sides would give 'input'

    ... Smoky-Back Room and Envelopes full of Money for Influence Peddling, not included! Because nothing says "cost-effective" regulation like a bunch of unelected appointees 'negotiating' in secret.

    We can't just let an industry go unregulated? Without strings to pull and sticks to wield, how is government ever supposed to use scare-tactics and populist demagoguery effectively? Because "contaminated well water", and "earthquakes"... hell, *tap water on fire*.... we don't gin up this kind of bullshit for *nothing*

  4. The Last American Hero   11 years ago

    So speeches that play well in Boulder aren't very popular when you enact them into law? Who'd have thunk it?

    1. Brandon   11 years ago

      Speeches that play well in Boulder aren't very popular with the parents whose work replenishes the trust funds in Boulder.

  5. KPres   11 years ago

    "His efforts ended up causing some rifts in the Democratic Party in Colorado, because the Democratic establishment there is not necessarily anti-fracking."

    So they are the party of science!

  6. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

    Looks to me like Polis got everything he wanted.

    The state will allow local regulation, and the state will adopt new restrictions.

    Real nice "compromise", there. Still, the point was to get some new talking points out before they got their assess handed to them at the polls, so mission accomplished.

  7. NeverBetter   11 years ago

    He wants "local" control since it's HIS location we're talking about. Too bad he doesn't want local control on anything else.

    http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_.....t-his-weld

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Sapping Small Business Optimism

Autumn Billings | 5.16.2025 12:00 PM

Andor Is a Star Wars Show About the Brutality of Bureaucracy

Peter Suderman | 5.16.2025 10:10 AM

Quality Seeds

Liz Wolfe | 5.16.2025 9:31 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!