Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Fracking

Rep. Polis Pulls Anti-Fracking Initiatives in Favor of Compromise

Scott Shackford | 8.4.2014 4:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Congress
(Congress)
What would "Battlestar Galactica" be like without fracking?
Rep. Jared Polis

In May, we took note of Colorado Democratic Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking initiatives in his state, though he sees it more of a "local control" effort than anti-fracking. Initiatives he threw his weight and money behind were intended to increase regulation on fracking in his state and give municipalities the authority to introduce further restrictions.

His efforts ended up causing some rifts in the Democratic Party in Colorado, because the Democratic establishment there is not necessarily anti-fracking. Polis' push put him at odds with Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper and Sen. Mark Udall.

Today, Polis and Hickenlooper reached a compromise that will result in Polis pulling his initiatives in exchange for the creation of an advisory task force to recommend fracking regulations to the state's legislature, where stakeholders from all sides would give input.

On Hickenlooper's side, the state will drop a lawsuit against the town of Longmont. The town had passed its own ban on fracking. According to The Hill, industry representatives also agreed to drop two pro-fracking initiatives, one of which would have blocked towns like Longmont from receiving tax revenue from oil and gas development.

Rep. Polis put out a response on Facebook that read in part:

These immediate steps give me great hope that together we will forge a solution that works for all of Colorado. Given my renewed hope that my constituents will be able to shape the statewide fracking policy through the legislative process as soon as the next legislative session, I am withdrawing my financial support for the proposed ballot initiatives. To be clear, I am not giving up this fight, I will continue to push for greater health and safety for my constituents through every avenue available to me. My sincere hope is that the legislature will heed the concerns of thousands of Coloradans that have demanded reasonable safeguards from oil and gas development. I want to thank all the community organizers that have worked tirelessly to bring their concerns to the forefront and have demanded action on this important issue. There is still a great amount of work to be done, but today represents real progress.

There's a video of their joint press conference here.

As always, when reading about fracking fears, it helps to have Ron Bailey's "Top 5 Lies About Fracking" on hand to dispel some of the myths.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Bill Maher Assails Speech Police Who 'Lay in Wait' on the Internet

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

FrackingColoradoNatural GasBallot InitiativesState Governments
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (8)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

    Oh, an "advisory task force"! Nice punt.

  2. Pathogen   11 years ago

    ? Don't rock the boat, baby..?

  3. GILMORE   11 years ago

    "an advisory 'task force' to 'recommend' fracking regulations to the state's legislature, where 'stakeholders' from all sides would give 'input'

    ... Smoky-Back Room and Envelopes full of Money for Influence Peddling, not included! Because nothing says "cost-effective" regulation like a bunch of unelected appointees 'negotiating' in secret.

    We can't just let an industry go unregulated? Without strings to pull and sticks to wield, how is government ever supposed to use scare-tactics and populist demagoguery effectively? Because "contaminated well water", and "earthquakes"... hell, *tap water on fire*.... we don't gin up this kind of bullshit for *nothing*

  4. The Last American Hero   11 years ago

    So speeches that play well in Boulder aren't very popular when you enact them into law? Who'd have thunk it?

    1. Brandon   11 years ago

      Speeches that play well in Boulder aren't very popular with the parents whose work replenishes the trust funds in Boulder.

  5. KPres   11 years ago

    "His efforts ended up causing some rifts in the Democratic Party in Colorado, because the Democratic establishment there is not necessarily anti-fracking."

    So they are the party of science!

  6. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

    Looks to me like Polis got everything he wanted.

    The state will allow local regulation, and the state will adopt new restrictions.

    Real nice "compromise", there. Still, the point was to get some new talking points out before they got their assess handed to them at the polls, so mission accomplished.

  7. NeverBetter   11 years ago

    He wants "local" control since it's HIS location we're talking about. Too bad he doesn't want local control on anything else.

    http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_.....t-his-weld

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Why Can't New York Get Rid of 2-Person Subway Crews?

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 1.17.2026 7:00 AM

ICE Agents Flouted DHS Policies That Could Have Prevented Renee Good's Death

Jacob Sullum | 1.16.2026 4:15 PM

Video Shows Feds Shooting ICE Protester With Nonlethal Round at Point-Blank Range, Blinding Him in One Eye

Autumn Billings | 1.16.2026 3:51 PM

Do Cellphones Cause Cancer? RFK Jr.'s HHS Is Suppressing FDA Data Confirming Cellphone Safety.

Ronald Bailey | 1.16.2026 3:25 PM

She Let Her 6-Year-Old Ride to the Park Alone. Georgia Called It Neglect.

Lenore Skenazy | 1.16.2026 3:10 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks