Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Inmate Languished for Two Hours After Botched Lethal Injection, Kim Jong-Un Mad About Dance Video: A.M. Links

Jar Jar Binks is more popular than the U.S. Congress.

Robby Soave | 7.24.2014 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Harry Crane \ Wikimedia Commons
(Harry Crane \ Wikimedia Commons)
  • Kim Jong-Un
    Harry Crane / Wikimedia Commons

    The two-hour-long death of convicted murder Joseph R. Wood III has renewed calls for the abolition of the death penalty. Wood was given a lethal injection in an Arizona prison on Wednesday, but did not die for another two hours. He "gasped and snorted" for a long time before succumbing, according to reports.

  • U.S. Ninth Circuit Court Judge Alex Kozinski said lethal injections should be replaced with firing squads. The injection shields the public "from the reality that we are shedding human blood," he said.
  • North Korean officials have asked China to remove a dance video that mocks leader King Jong-Un from the internet. The video features Jong-Un's head superimposed over kung-fu dancers and fighters. Chinese officials were unable to do anything about it, they said.
  • President Obama is drawing criticism for refusing to let the press accompany him to several fundraising events this week.
  • Jar Jar Binks is more popular than the U.S. Congress.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Ben Bernanke: Life is "Absolutely" Better Now Than He's No Longer at Fed; Doesn't Want to Talk About Auditing the Fed

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (471)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Jar Jar Binks is more popular than the U.S. Congress.

    Me not know how to feel about this.

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      "Meesa move for a vote of no confidence in Speaker Boehner"

    2. Restoras   11 years ago

      Yousa cansa turn offsa lightsa now, meesa thinks the Republic issa finished.

    3. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

      Meesa want to see both-a put in sack and drowned!

    4. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

      "Jar Jar makes the Ewoks look like fucking Shaft!"

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4TX6x2WLgk

      1. PD Scott   11 years ago

        "Who're the little furry things that make all-l-l the troopers dead?
        "'WOKS!"
        "You're daammn right!"

    5. The Last American Hero   11 years ago

      Who cares if some Star Trek character is more popular than Congress?

      1. Tim   11 years ago

        I saw that.

    6. ?nus   11 years ago

      Didn't Jar Jar become some kind of senator? Could Lucas have been making some kind of pointed attack at our political system?

      No! That's impossible!

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        I believe he was only a representative, so he'd be in the House.

        1. Free Society   11 years ago

          I think he was 'acting senator' when Amidala was having mensies or whatever. As representative he carried at least 89% of the Gungan vote as well. If it's racist for a Nabooan to not vote for someone on the basis of being Gungan, then how is it not racist for the Gungans to monolithically vote for their candidates on racial grounds? Whenever they vote for a non-Gungan, it's only cause their Nabooan candidate pandered to their racial sensitivities. The Nabooan left is doing

          1. Free Society   11 years ago

            *The Nabooan left is doing this to keep the Gungans on the seaweed plantation.

            1. Dweebston   11 years ago

              +2 Space Limbaugh

      2. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

        Search your feelings; you know it to be true!

    7. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Hello.

      Too late?

    8. Bobarian   11 years ago

      Doing the Jar Jar comparison is worse than doing the Godwin.

      You know else is worse than Jar Jar?

      Nikki would be the only correct answer.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    President Obama is drawing criticism for refusing to let the press accompany him to several fundraising events this week.

    They'll have to wait a few hours to resume humping his leg. So what.

    1. SugarFree   11 years ago

      They are worried there might be a gap in cover they can gratefully provide him.

      1. John   11 years ago

        The work of a courtier is never done.

    2. Pathogen   11 years ago

      They wait at the door like a lonely and loyal golden retriever.. tail wagging as he steps out through the door.. Walkies!

  3. Bee Tagger   11 years ago

    The injection shields the public "from the reality that we are shedding human blood," he said.

    I'd hate to see how he wants us to pay our taxes.

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      In pounds of flesh. They way it should be.

      1. PM   11 years ago

        Yes, but measured in standard or troy ounces?

        1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

          Depends on which bracket you're in.

    2. The Last American Hero   11 years ago

      Should have had Obama swing by and do it. He claims he's good at killing people.

    3. Stilgar   11 years ago

      I agree with him. Bring back the firing squad. Might want to consider that 'off with their head' thing too.

      1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

        Supposedly an impetus for the end of the French Revolution beheading frenzy was a women NOT going with dignity but screaming and crying her head off.

        Kinda brings it home to the folks in the front row.

      2. thom   11 years ago

        Or even better, if the government insists on killing people, they could do it with a single shot to the head while a person is sleeping. Why should the condemned be forced to undergo an entire elaborate ceremony that ultimately ends in their death? Just take them out cleanly when they're not expecting it and let them go in peace.

    4. Rasilio   11 years ago

      Hey bullets are probably cheaper than the drugs

  4. mister b?nus   11 years ago

    Chinese officials were unable to do anything about it

    China banned from /r/pyongyang!

  5. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    North Korean officials have asked China to remove a dance video that mocks leader King Jong-Un from the internet.

    "I have a dream... that you will take down that video..."

    1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

      I'm afraid I'm going to have to insist that someone acknowledge what I did here.

      1. Jerryskids   11 years ago

        I will acknowledge that I now just have this confused image in my head of Jong-Un menacingly stabbing a watermelon.

      2. Pathogen   11 years ago

        Is the Norks would've only spontaneously rioted over that video, and slaughtered some Chinese ambassador and his gunrunners staff, your concerns and theirs would have been righteously acknowledged...

      3. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

        Once again, I'm really going to have to insist that people read carefully my comment, including the accurately quoted text.

        1. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

          Why would we acknowledge the vile, disgusting racist humor that tickles your inscrutable China-man savage sense of humor?

          1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

            I think "man" should also be capitalized there.

        2. hamilton   11 years ago

          I consider comment joke re-emphasizing a far greater sin than comment second-joking.

          1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

            I hate allowing mediocrity in my audience to stand unaddressed.

  6. SugarFree   11 years ago

    Makes sense. Given the lack of traction for ending the Drug War, Jar Jar Binks is less of a racist caricature than Congress at this point.

  7. Bee Tagger   11 years ago

    The video features Jong-Un's head superimposed over kung-fu dancers and fighters.

    China said they were only able to superimpose the Yangtze River over the kung-fu dancers and fighters.

    1. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

      Dear Jim,

      The late Kim Jong-il was a massive fan of both the Spice Girls and fancy dress. Could you paint me a collage of Polaroids he took dressed up as every member standing in front of a giant letter such that it spells the word 'Spice'. Note he hasn't taken his glasses off for any of the pictures and when dressed as ginger spice he is wearing a North Korean flag dress instead of the Union Jack dress. He has also included magazine cut outs saying 'girl power' and 'spice up your life'.

      http://jimllpaintit.tumblr.com/image/87611475979

  8. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

    Australian woman arrested in Lebanon for adultery 'deserves it', says brother

    http://www.theguardian.com/wor.....ys-brother

    1. John   11 years ago

      Let me guess, even though they are from Australia they don't look like Paul Hogan. They are fucked up crazy Muslims who managed to immigrate to Australia.

      1. PM   11 years ago

        RACIST!

        But...

        Her brother Ahmed, speaking from Sydney, said Issa "deserves what she gets".

      2. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

        You win the prize.

        Her brother Ahmed, speaking from Sydney, said Issa "deserves what she gets".

        "She has wronged the system," he told Macquarie Radio.

        Wronged the system? Was she fucking it too?

        1. Bobarian   11 years ago

          "Was she fucking it too?"

          No, she was cheating on the system, by fucking the arbitrary 12 month restriction.

      3. Bones   11 years ago

        Reading the article confirms your suspicion.

  9. John   11 years ago

    Gee, maybe the anti death penalty people shouldn't have made the good drugs unavailable or maybe not insisted on lethal injection in the first place. When we hanged people or put them before a firing squad, this sort of thing never happened.

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      I'm wonder if anyone is acutally going to try inert atmosphere asphyxiation.

      1. PM   11 years ago

        In the early 90's it was floated as a serious alternative by some conservative groups, including National Review.

        1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

          But it wasn't actually tried!

      2. ?nus   11 years ago

        That's only for suicides.

      3. Ted S.   11 years ago

        I oppose the death penalty, but if we're going to have one, I don't see why firing squads or guillotines are so horrible.

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

          Cross bow!

        2. Pathogen   11 years ago

          Load them into a trebuchet, and fling them against the prison's tallest wall... That ought to awaken them to "the reality that we are shedding human blood,"

          1. Bobarian   11 years ago

            A circus cannon, to keep it a little more festive.

    2. SugarFree   11 years ago

      Morphine: Cheap, Plentiful and Effective

      1. John   11 years ago

        So are bullets. Done well, you never know what hit you.

      2. Drake   11 years ago

        Yeah, I just don't understand this problem. A great big syringe of morphine would do the trick in a minute.

    3. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Actually, it did happen. Jesse James' step-father, I believe, was saved from a hanging, and suffered neck problems for the rest of his life as a result.

    4. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      I saw send them on a one-way trip to Mars. I mean, people are volunteering for this, so it's not cruel. We'll regularly resupply them and provide equipment and housing; otherwise, they are free.

      1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

        Space Australia?

        1. RBS   11 years ago

          So like Alien 3

        2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          Yes, but less deadly.

          1. Bobarian   11 years ago

            No drop bears? We'd have to send some.

      2. Ted S.   11 years ago

        Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids. In fact, it's cold as hell.

        1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

          It's going to be all men anyway, so there won't be any kids to raise.

          Where the female criminals are sent is left as an exercise to the reader...

          1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

            Venus. It only makes sense.

          2. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

            Split between Warty's basement and SugarFree's dungeon?

            Maybe send a couple to STEVE SMITH?

      3. Rhywun   11 years ago

        Bring them robot wives, too.

        1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

          +1 Harry Mudd?

          1. Rhywun   11 years ago

            +1 Twilight Zone

      4. Brett L   11 years ago

        Mars is a Harsh Mistress?

    5. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

      When we hanged people or put them before a firing squad, this sort of thing never happened.

      Actually, they fucked up hangings all the time (the gallows broke, the length of rope was miscalculated (couldn't have happened to a nicer guy), the rope wasn't tight enough to snap the neck but enough to let the guy slowly suffocate for several minutes, etc.

      The difference is no one gave a shit.

      1. Brett L   11 years ago

        There is a reason why the US Navy has tables and tables of data for cross-referencing rope material, rope thickness, and number of turns needed to have an effective hanging.

    6. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

      There are gallons of good drugs available for this. Why we decided to use some exotic cocktail, I have no idea.

      Just jack full of damn near any barbituate or opiate, and they'll go super fast and easy. An easier death than most people.

      This ain't rocket surgery.

  10. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

    A Minneapolis family was asked to get off a Southwest Airlines flight in Colorado because of a tweet the father sent out complaining about the airline's service before the departure from Denver International Airport.

    http://www.smh.com.au/travel/t.....z38OHrQAAP

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Don't send back your food in a restaurant. And don't complain about a company until after the service has been rendered.

    2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

      Southwest is learning about the Streisand Effect.

    3. JW   11 years ago

      Holy fuck, have airlines become preening little cunts, post 9-11.

      "His 6-year old paralyzed son made me fear for my life!"

  11. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Wood was given a lethal injection in an Arizona prison on Wednesday, but did not die for another two hours.

    I blame environmentalists and their low-flow syringes.

    1. PM   11 years ago

      Low flow? I don't like the sound of that...

    2. SugarFree   11 years ago

      Sometimes you have to inject the same syringe two or three times.

      1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

        A syringe full of air would work, too.

  12. Ted S.   11 years ago

    I know we make fun of Obama for going off and golfing, and people made fun of Bush for being at his ranch instead of at the White House, but something about this article bothers me:

    People going nuts because politician runs a triathlon instead of constantly talking about geopolitics

    Premier Alexander Stubb took part in Saturday's Joroinen Triathlon, and he was very pleased with his performance. That much was clear from his twitter feed, which was filled with photos, reports and insight into how the head of government's race was progressing.

    Unfortunately for the athletic prime minister, the Finnish media was quick to note that other statesmen in the Nordic countries were at the time tweeting and speaking about the crises in Gaza and Ukraine. Helsingin Sanomat and Kotimaa published critical articles on Stubb's behaviour.

    It's not as though those situations were changing rapidly enough that every politician in the world needed to be commenting on them every hour. And perhaps it's not a bad thing if we've got politicians who realize they're not the be-all and end-all. And really, what's the PM of a country of 5.5M people really going to be able to do about any of these situations?

    This isn't the first time people went off the deep end over Stubb, either.

    1. John   11 years ago

      What the hell is Finland supposed to do about Ukraine? Let the man do his triathlon.

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

        'Finnish them off' is their slogan. Didn't you know that?

      2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Fight the Russians to a standstill again?

        1. John   11 years ago

          There is always that.

          1. Drake   11 years ago

            Then he should be doing Biathlons.

      3. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

        Send people in incredible shape to fight, regardless of whether they have to run, swim, or bike their way to the battlefield?

    2. gaijin   11 years ago

      other statesmen in the Nordic countries were at the time tweeting and speaking

      They were doing so much

    3. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      You'll have to remind me why you follow Finnish affairs again?

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        I spent a week in Finland ages ago on the way to my semester in Russia, and always wanted to try to learn Finnish to keep my mind active (since it's so different from Indo-European languages). I've always wanted to go back and see Lapland and the like, but haven't gotten the chance.

        Or the alternative answer is that I'm just a weirdo.

    4. Bill Dalasio   11 years ago

      Don't just run there! DO SOMETHING!!one1!!

  13. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Jar Jar Binks is more popular than the U.S. Congress.

    That's because he, compared to any Congressman, is impressively articulate and knowledgeable.

    1. Suthenboy   11 years ago

      ...and less corrupt.

      1. alan_s   11 years ago

        Except for that whole giving the emperor emergency powers thing.

        1. Pathogen   11 years ago

          His child like naivety... and mental capacity. Useful fool is useful.

  14. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

    Euthanasia advocate banned from practising medicine after murder suspect tops himself

    http://www.smh.com.au/national.....z38OIyaJ3g

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      Voluntary or involuntary euthenasia? Or just in favor of killing in general?

      1. PM   11 years ago

        Mr Brayley died in May after taking a fatal overdose of a drug discussed at Exit International forums.

        His wife, Lina, 37, died in February 2011 after she fell from the top of a quarry while taking photographs. The death was initially believed to be an accident, but it emerged after Mr Brayley took his life that he was being investigated for his alleged involvement.

        Apparently he counseled a suspected murderer on how to kill himself. The horror.

        1. gaijin   11 years ago

          Exit International...given the subject, what a fabulously named conference

    2. SugarFree   11 years ago

      I've never understood the desire to keep a murder suspect or convict from killing themselves. They are both admitting guilt and somewhat atoning for their actions.

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        Because in a lot of common law countries, if you die a mere suspect, they can't out and out say you killed the person.

        1. SugarFree   11 years ago

          OK, it does inhibit wrongful death lawsuits and such. But surely convicts should be able to use the suicide booth.

          1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

            I am no peace freak, in defense I will destroy anything threatening my family. BUT the power we give to the government in the death penalty is purely for revenge. The same reason why they want to be the one to execute it. No other rational reason. I know John will come here and say it is expensive to keep them alive, or some Hammurabi code BS but the truth is I am of the belief that we should let 10 criminals go before killing one falsely convicted.

            1. Azathoth!!   11 years ago

              Since we let far more than 10 go free every day, you should be fine with the death penalty.

      2. Ted S.   11 years ago

        There are innocent people whose lives are so fucked up by prosecutors that they commit suicide.

        Not that I'm saying pepole shouldn't have the right to end their life at a time of their own choosing.

        1. SugarFree   11 years ago

          But not killing yourself in that situation really doesn't keep the evil shits from destroying your life. Killing yourself can be a rational choice when confronted with a Kafkaesque nightmare.

          1. Ted S.   11 years ago

            Sure, but if it closes the case and the actual guilty party is still on the loose, there's a problem.

            1. SugarFree   11 years ago

              there's a problem.

              I agree, but if you are getting railroaded, they aren't looking for the real killer anyway. This is exactly what happened to OJ.

              1. Bobarian   11 years ago

                "This is exactly what happened to OJ"

                Nice. +3 ring of troll power.

          2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

            You know, for those of us who actually pay taxes, we should be able to opt for the style of imprisonment we get when they start locking people up for political beliefs. "Sir, we have four options for your incarceration today, Turkish, Black Hole of Calcutta, gulag, or, our special today, the Kafka."

          3. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

            Would you not rather take out the source of the nightmare?

            1. SugarFree   11 years ago

              If you could. But I doubt the choice is ever: murder corrupt prosecutor or kill yourself.

              I'm not saying you should kill yourself, just that I don't think it's a choice you should have taken away from you.

              And besides, until conviction you still retain the right of self-ownership which means you life is your to do with as you see fit.

              1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

                Makes sense.

        2. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

          There are innocent people whose lives are so fucked up by prosecutors that they commit suicide.

          If I got to that point, I have to believe I'd want to see how many of the fuckers I could take with me.

      3. Drake   11 years ago

        And saving the rest of us a lot of money.

      4. RBS   11 years ago

        True, but it robs The State of it's revenge.

        1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

          THIS

        2. Pathogen   11 years ago

          True, but it robs The State of it's revenge perceived control.

          Asking the government to forgo frog-marching the suspect before the cameras, a solid hammering at the hands of a prosecutor more concerned with his own conviction ratio and political machinations based on those ratios, than the defendants guilt or innocence, and degrading ignominy of prison, and finally, state execution... that's out of the question. They need the circus to instill the perception of control.

  15. John   11 years ago

    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/g.....d-n1865078

    CNN Poll, twice as many Americans say they were harmed by Obamacare as say they were helped. But it is a big nothing. Shreeky told me.

    And it looks like the free shit brigade might be a little under manned on this one.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

      More than half of Americans believe that they or others are better off with Obamacare, a new poll shows.

      The CNN poll released Wednesday found that 18 percent of respondents said they or their family had benefited from the health care law, while an additional 35 percent said while they may not be better off, the lives of others have improved.

      Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/.....z38OKLN3ff

      The ACA won't be a factor in November. You know I am right.

      1. John   11 years ago

        More than half of Americans believe that they or others are better off with Obamacare, a new poll shows.

        The OR OTHERS retard. The reality is the millions of people will harmed by this. But don't let the fact that Obama is a fucking retard fucked up everyone's healthcare from you claiming RACISM when the Democrats get their asses handed to them in November.

        Why does Obama hate Americans with health insurance? Why does Obama hate doctors and healthcare?

        1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

          I read that, you jackass. The point you missed is that a slight plurality find positives in the ACA. Of course 40% of the US that are hard core conservatives will always hate it but they vote GOP anyway.

          Again, you were predicting DOOM! in November for Dems - and now you don't spout that bullshit anymore. Even Kay Hagan is moving up in NC.

          1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

            Walsh in Montana is now toast.

            http://www.politico.com/story/.....09293.html

            1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

              MT, WV, SD are all toast. That makes it 52-48 with six tossup states deciding who gets the Senate.

              LA, IA, AR, NC, AK, CO

              KY is a wild card.

              1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

                I think the Washington Post has it at 90% chance of GOP taking the Senate.

      2. Longtorso, Johnny   11 years ago

        Hey Weigel.

      3. The Last American Hero   11 years ago

        Which is why the Team Blue guys in contested seats are running so hard on it?

        1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

          Some are. Hagan and Prior among others.

          1. Collegiate Inspector   11 years ago

            How can AR be a toss-up? Tom Cotton is a 37yo Harvard-educated Marine veteran. Whereas David Prior is just some dude with a famous name...

            This is like when George Allen was in a fairly competitive race with Jim Webb...it boggles the mind that it's even close...

      4. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

        Thursday HAPPY Thursday!

    2. Ted S.   11 years ago

      8% think they were helped, 16% think they were harmed.

      Since 76% have a neutral opinion, it is a big nothing.

      1. John   11 years ago

        So an 8% swing doesn't matter? Not exactly. Actively harming 16% of the country with your "signature achievement" is a big deal.

        How many Americans actually served in Iraq much less were wounded? Was that a big nothing?

        1. Ted S.   11 years ago

          Perhaps I should have included a /sarcasm tag. You'll realize there's a reason I said that 8% claimed to be helped.

          1. PH2050   11 years ago

            John apparently forgot about the running gag regarding PB and "8%"...

  16. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

    WASHINGTON ? U.S. Senate Democrats included $225 million for Israel's Iron Dome rocket interception system in an emergency funding bill on Tuesday that also cut $1 billion from President Barack Obama's request for $3.7 billion to deal with thousands of undocumented child immigrants.

    "Israel is an essential American ally and needs these assets to defend itself," said Maryland Democratic Senator Barbara Mikulski, chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, in a statement.

    http://www.nytimes.com/reuters......html?_r=1

    1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

      No rider for $30 million of taxpayer money to support the perverted arts?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

        The following people are gay:

        1. hamilton   11 years ago

          Turn it off!

    2. Bones   11 years ago

      Are you touting this as good? Israel has their own assets with which to defend itself. They should use their assets instead of ours.

      1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

        Not at all. I-P pie fights don't interest me.

        1. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

          Why did you have to bring copyright into it?

      2. Lord Peter Wimsey   11 years ago

        "They should use their assets instead of ours."

        So you agree with Israeli settlers. Stop US aid (and the strings attached) and deal decisively with the barbarians who wish to "drive every Jew into the sea."

        Oh, and by the way: once the "assets" (in the form of money) are stolen from you and I, they are no longer our assets. They are the government's assests. Why bitch about one use of these assets over the many others?

    3. Chinny Chin Chin   11 years ago

      "Israel is an essential American ally..."

      Why is that, exactly?

      1. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

        They didn't dance in the streets with glee on 9/11?

      2. Lord Peter Wimsey   11 years ago

        "Why is that, exactly?"

        Israel is democratic? Capitalist? Contributes to world technology advancement (laptop, cellphone)? Medical advances? Shared intelligence?

        Civilized?

        Not run by murderous lunatics?

        Sorry. I know my list is incomplete.

      3. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

        Primarily because they opposed the Soviets in the Middle East during the Cold War

        1. jmomls   11 years ago

          Odd that it was the Soviets who were instrumental in their receiving recognition upon declaration of a state in 1948.

      4. Rasilio   11 years ago

        Cause they have nukes and if we don't keep them as an ally they will likely use those nukes on their enemies which will just kill our supply of oil

    4. Lord Peter Wimsey   11 years ago

      Go Dems! I would prefer we not send money to anyone, but the money has already been...acquired by the gubmint and will be handed out to someone.

      Might as well be used to stop missiles launched by a bunch of guys who think of Hitler like we think of Elvis.

  17. PM   11 years ago

    Surgeons remove 232 teeth from Indian teenager

    Surgeons in Mumbai have removed 232 teeth from the mouth of an Indian teenager in what they believe may be a world-record operation, the hospital said Thursday.

    Ashik Gavai, 17, sought medical help for a swelling on the right side of his lower jaw and the case was referred to the city's JJ Hospital, where they found he was suffering from a condition known as complex odontoma, head of dentistry Sunanda Dhivare-Palwankar told AFP.

    "We operated on Monday and it took us almost seven hours. We thought it may be a simple surgery but once we opened it there were multiple pearl-like teeth inside the jaw bone," she said.

    1. db   11 years ago

      That's a whole lot of absorbed siblings...

    2. SugarFree   11 years ago

      And yet another X-man is kept from reaching his full potential.

      1. RBS   11 years ago

        His power would be something like a shark's jaw?

        1. SugarFree   11 years ago

          Yup. An X-TREME version of Matter-Eater Lad. Think of the thousands of pockets and pouches his uniform could have. And oh, the bandoliers.

          1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

            Good thing they nipped that Leifeldian nightmare in the bud.

            1. SugarFree   11 years ago

              Nightmare? Don't all the people you see in real life have shins that are 1/4 the length of their thighs and no feet?

    3. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Surgeons removed 232 teeth except one as a joke.

      1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

        "....so you can have a toothache!"

    4. antisocial-ist   11 years ago

      Was India colonized by carnies back in the day? I can't count how many stories I've read like this.

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        They have 1/7th of all the people on the planet. Odd deformity or medical anomaly appears, higher odds of it being Indian or Chinese through sheer probability.

      2. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

        Yes, a little known fact - the East India Company had a shadow war with Midway Amusements to control the India trade. Midwest lost, but left its genetic imprint upon the hapless Indian populace...

        1. Steve G   11 years ago

          *squints*
          not sure if...well, you know the rest

  18. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

    Came across this yesterday, article about the controversy about Glenn Beck speaking at Liberty U, and it seems there was an element present not found in some of the other 'controversial commencement/convocation speaker controversies:'

    "According to reports, students who skipped the event were fined $10 for their failure to attend the ceremony." http://www.gospelherald.com/ar.....tlyCd.dpuf

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      Liberty is not known for a being a bastion of tolerant thought. I think Goldwater had Falwell pretty much nailed.

      1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

        Another article I read said that an anti-
        Mormon businessman stood in front of the platform and handed out 20 dollar bills to any student whose conscience moved them to leave in protest. It was a 'I was told by some participants' story so take it for what it is worth.

      2. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

        I so wish the GOP had conservatives like Goldwater today. It would be respectable and he wasn't perfect by any standard.

        1. Lord Peter Wimsey   11 years ago

          No you don't. You really don't.

      3. PH2050   11 years ago

        Falwell's such a tool, using his dad's money from that devil liquor to set up his fleecing operation.

        Yes, fleecing operation. Personally verified, worked for his construction company.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

          Well driller?

    2. gaijin   11 years ago

      students who skipped the event were fined $10 for their failure to attend

      Sounds like a penaltax

  19. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Unfortunately for the athletic prime minister, the Finnish media was quick to note that other statesmen in the Nordic countries were at the time tweeting and speaking about the crises in Gaza and Ukraine.

    When all was said and done, who actually had accomplished something in the real world?

  20. Edwin   11 years ago

    that story isn't evidence that we should stop the death penalty, it's evidence we should go back to the elctric chair. Never had any problems like this. You zap the guy, he dies.

    And honestly, I've said it before, and I'll say it again, lethal injection is the most cruel way to kill someone. It's so DELIBERATE, you have to focus on the fact that those are your last moments! When you fall asleep, you know it's for the last time. With the electric chair, there is no shift in conciousness, there is no seeing them put in a needle or drip. You just sit in a chair, wear a hood, and just die instantaneously.
    That or firing squad. All that pain would be wonderfully distracting from the extremely heavy thoughts that YOU ARE DYING. I'd rather go out in intense pain than have to fucking ruminate on the fact that I'm going to die

    1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

      "it's evidence we should go back to the elctric chair. Never had any problems like this. You zap the guy, he dies."

      http://www.nydailynews.com/arc.....e-1.751043

      1. Restoras   11 years ago

        The chair looks like a nasty way to die.

    2. John   11 years ago

      The anti death penalty people are fucking evil. They worked to make executions harder in hopes just this sort of thing would happen and they could use it to argue against the death penalty. That is horrible.

      1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

        I am not sure how they caused this particular result, what's your theory?

        1. John   11 years ago

          The guy languished because the anti death penalty people argued that the effective drugs were cruel and made them impossible to get. This never happened in years of lethal injections with the old drugs. The activists have worked to make every humane form of execution impossible in the hopes that states would either not do it or if they did, they would have a gruesome death to use for political ends.

          1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

            Fair enough, but perhaps they honestly thought the previous 'cocktail' was cruel and unusual also?

          2. thom   11 years ago

            Well, if you've eliminated all of the humane methods of execution then the remaining methods are at the least cruel, and most likely unusual as well, so the State shouldn't be executing people with those methods.

        2. tarran   11 years ago

          If they hadn't given assistance to the Eruomaidan movement, Moscow wouldn't be giving separatists SA-11 launchers.

          1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

            I stand by my defense of Ron Paul last night. I never knew there were so many Paul detractors here.

            1. Suthenboy   11 years ago

              I am not a detractor of Dr. Paul. I am a detractor of stupid statements and stupid positions. It is easy to hammer some people because they have no principles and are consistently on the wrong side of every argument. Paul, not so much. But when he steps in it he should be called on it.

              1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

                Fair enough, but I like to give the man who helped attract me to libertarianism as charitable of a reading of his comments as I can.

                1. Azathoth!!   11 years ago

                  Fair enough, but I like to give the man who helped attract me to libertarianism as charitable of a reading of his comments as I can.

                  And that person is Ron Paul? The Republican congressman? The staunchly pro-life Republican congressman?

            2. tarran   11 years ago

              Don't get me wrong...

              I was just pointing out that John was engaging in a form of argumentation he normally decries.

              I also would like to take this moment to express my admiration for Test Pattern.

              1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

                Apologies for misunderstanding then.

      2. Zeb   11 years ago

        The anti death penalty people are fucking evil.

        That's a bit strong (and overly general). There are alternatives to lethal injection if the right drugs aren't available. I'd say the people who continue to insist on using lethal injection despite not being able to do it properly are more evil anyway.

      3. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Well, I'm anti-death penalty--for several reasons--but I'm not interested in making the deaths crueler to advance this position.

        Not that some of these evil fucks don't likely deserve horrible deaths--most of them inflicted the same on someone else--but I don't trust the government to do much of anything, including dispensing absolute justice.

        1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

          The humane way to execute someone?

          A rock dropped very specifically from a really high place, at a time unbeknownst to the person being executed.

          1. thom   11 years ago

            A bullet in the head in the middle of the night while the condemned is sleeping.

        2. Pope Jimbo   11 years ago

          I don't have any moral qualms about the theory of the death penalty. However, in practice I oppose it for exactly the reason you said ProL. The gubbment has to be one of the worse organizations ever to entrust the duty of applying the death penalty.

          I was on jury duty last week and had to sit in on a 1st degree murder trial that would have been funny if the stakes weren't so high. The state had no eye witnesses, no fingerprints, no dna. Nothing. All they had were the testimony of 5 guys who were in a gang together (the defendent wasn't in the gang). What a cluster fuck.

          No way the DA and the system that put on that case should be also able to take someone's life.

          1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

            The criminal trial I was a juror for (for much, much lower stakes) was a case where a whole element of the offense not only wasn't argued, there apparently never was any evidence for it. Not sure who thought bringing that case made sense, but they did. And they lost.

          2. Jerryskids   11 years ago

            Agree 100 times over. As a libertarian I believe that you should treat others as you would have them treat you. A guy that goes around killing or raping or robbing other people has no good argument against killing or raping or robbing other people when he himself is the other people, does he? But the government is just about the last group I would trust to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that any given person they've arrested is actually guilty of killing or raping or robbing other people.

      4. Ted S.   11 years ago

        Only some of them. Read my comment above.

      5. The Last American Hero   11 years ago

        Just because I don't trust the State enough to believe in the death penalty, I'm evil? I think the long history of exoneration cases for death row inmates should give any pro-death penalty person pause. I guess that counts for evil.

        1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

          So I knew I hadn't read far enough down before commenting. A blanket "I Agree with ProL" will suffice here.

    3. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

      I am no chemist so tell me why vets can euthanize a horse in seconds every time by lethal injection but prisons cannot do the same to a person?

      1. db   11 years ago

        You ask for a miracle and I give you the F-D-A.

        1. Steve G   11 years ago

          +1 Gruber

      2. PM   11 years ago

        Vets are allowed to buy the correct drugs for the procedure from legit pharmacies and administer them in a more practical manner.

        1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

          I thought prisons bought lethal drugs from compounding labs not monitored by the FDA.

          I might be mistaken on this.

          Now industry attorneys, government regulators, and other stakeholders say Congress needs to act to clarify who has authority to regulate such practices. The FDA ? despite clamoring for such power before ? has had most, if not all, of that authority taken away and it now lies with states, where regulations and oversight vary widely.

          In a nutshell, pharmacies, including compounders, are regulated by states; drug manufacturers are overseen by the FDA.

          http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/20.....sight.html

          1. PM   11 years ago

            I thought prisons bought lethal drugs from compounding labs not monitored by the FDA.

            That may just have something to do with it, just sayin'. There were also rumors that some states were obtaining veterinary drugs for the procedure.

      3. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

        Government is so fucked up that it can't even do an overdose correctly.

    4. PM   11 years ago

      we should go back to the elctric chair. Never had any problems like this. You zap the guy, he dies.

      Well...

      Kemmler was executed in New York's Auburn Prison on August 6, 1890; the "state electrician" was Edwin F. Davis. The first 17-second passage of current through Kemmler caused unconsciousness, but failed to stop his heart and breathing. The attending physicians, Edward Charles Spitzka and Charles F. Macdonald, came forward to examine Kemmler. After confirming Kemmler was still alive, Spitzka reportedly called out, "Have the current turned on again, quick, no delay." The generator needed time to re-charge, however. In the second attempt, Kemmler was shocked with 2,000 volts. Blood vessels under the skin ruptured and bled, and the areas around the electrodes singed. The entire execution took about eight minutes. George Westinghouse later commented that "they would have done better using an axe,"[13] and a witnessing reporter claimed that it was "an awful spectacle, far worse than hanging."[14]

      1. ?nus   11 years ago

        Does that qualify as metal?

        1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

          Old Sparky was mostly wooden 😉

      2. TwB   11 years ago

        And don't forget about Marv in Sin City. It took those "pansies" two tries to end his crazy ass life.

    5. Zeb   11 years ago

      There are lots of real reasons to oppose the death penalty, but I agree that lethal injection being a stupid way to do it is not really a good one.

      A always thought that the electric chair was silly and needlessly elaborate as well (and there have been fuckups with it as well where death didn't come as quickly as promised). Firing squad, hanging (done properly) or beheading would all be better in my opinion.

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

        "Firing squad, hanging (done properly) or beheading would all be better in my opinion."

        Try and sell that to those who oppose the death penalty. Especially the pearl clutching types.

        1. Ted S.   11 years ago

          I agree with Pro Libertate's comment above. I don't trust the state with the power to execute people because I don't trust the state with most lesser powers, wither. Of course a lot of the people who oppose capital punishment are perfectly fine with the state having all sorts of powers, just not that one.

  21. Zeb   11 years ago

    I like this Kozinsky guy. Whether or not it is a good thing for the government to be doing, people should face the reality of what execution is: cold blooded killing.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      Same with war. It's not humanitarian, it's not setting people free, it's war, it's ugly, it's bloody, it's inherently unjust, and it should only be used when absolutely necessary.

      1. Zeb   11 years ago

        Exactly. Neither should be considered a good or noble thing. Perhaps you have to do it sometimes if the alternatives are worse, but it's a necessary evil at best.

  22. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    The Bloombergers are talking about GM, right now.

    "Well, if not for the costs of recalling half the cars they built in the last ten years, they would have had a great quarter."

    Who the fuck would walk into a GM dealer and buy a car?

    1. Steve G   11 years ago

      If not for the pounding they took at the hands of the Seahawks, the Broncos would have had a great Superbowl!
      This game is fun...

      1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

        I dont like you.

    2. thom   11 years ago

      The last two cars I've purchased have been Chevys. They were both cheap and have so far been reliable.

      1. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

        I am disappoint.

        I will never again buy a new or used GM or Dodge, because of the bailout and the unions. It is very unlikely that I will ever own another Ford, because of the unions.

        For the exact same reason that I don't buy Cuban cigars. The Castros pocket that money, and I try not to put money in the pockets of goons and crooks.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

          The 6.0 and 6.4 diesels from Ford ought to be enough reason to never own a Ford again. Bastards got me good with those.

  23. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

    8th Circuit Case Decides: When may a felon, who is generally barred from possessing a gun, get it to break up a fight?

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....p-a-fight/

  24. Longtorso, Johnny   11 years ago

    Teen who sued parents files domestic order against beau
    MORRISTOWN, N.J. ? Rachel Canning, the teenager who moved out of her parents' home and then sued them for support and college costs, has gotten a domestic violence temporary restraining order against her boyfriend ? the man her parents had wanted her to stop seeing....

    1. John   11 years ago

      Gee, she was dating a idiot bad boy and was in "love". Never could have seen that coming.

      1. tarran   11 years ago

        I swear, her lawyer must have thanked his lucky stars the day that girl sashayed her way into his office.

        1. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

          Isn't her lawyer her (now ex-) boyfriend's father?

    2. TwB   11 years ago

      And she hasn't even left for college yet. I can only imagine the poor choices she's going to continue to make this fall and over the next 4 years. But hey, keep fucking up until you learn better, I guess.

      1. DontShootMe   11 years ago

        At this point, shouldn't some network offer her a reality show?

        1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

          I think you are right - maybe MTV?

        2. Ted S.   11 years ago

          MTV can replace Jersey Shore with this.

        3. Steve G   11 years ago

          Mean Girls IRL!

      2. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

        Day 1: Hitting up a frat party where she doesn't know anybody. What could go wrong?

        1. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

          Depends on what you mean by "wrong."

    3. Anonymous Coward   11 years ago

      I wonder who is going to be lucky enough to catch this entitled, over-indulged, little princess and put a ring on it?

      1. Tejicano   11 years ago

        The same guy who, three months later, will have his own tooth-marks and dried spittle on the muzzle of his shotgun.

        1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

          This should not have made me laugh... but it did.

  25. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

    "Wood was convicted of fatally shooting Dietz and her father, 55-year-old Gene Dietz, at their auto repair shop in Tucson.

    Wood and Debbie Dietz had a tumultuous relationship during which he repeatedly assaulted her. She tried to end their relationship and got an order of protection against Wood.

    On the day of the shooting, Wood went to the auto shop and waited for Gene Dietz, who disapproved of his daughter's relationship with Wood, to get off the phone. Once the father hung up, Wood pulled out a revolver, shot him in the chest and then smiled.

    Wood then turned his attention toward Debbie Dietz, who was trying to telephone for help. Wood grabbed her by the neck and put his gun to her chest. She pleaded with him to spare her life. An employee heard Wood say, "I told you I was going to do it. I have to kill you." He then called her an expletive and fired two shots in her chest."

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      If all accurate, then I'm glad he suffered.

    2. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

      But the poor guy suffered last night so we must feel sorry for him, not the lives he destroyed.

      1. lap83   11 years ago

        Exactly. I guess I'm cruel for wanting to discourage psychopathic behavior.

        1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

          His crime does not change the arguments above (about government incompetence) and this only demonstrates my point that the DP is nothing but simple revenge. It has nothing to do with justice or security. It is simply a different set of psychopaths, elected ones, doing the killing. If DP advocates would like to debate on the moral aspect of revenge by proxy of the state then fine. But not all anti-dp folks are of the same cloth.

          1. Lord Peter Wimsey   11 years ago

            "DP is nothing but simple revenge. It has nothing to do with justice or security. "

            I'm against the death penalty, but it certainly deters the murderer from committing more crimes. And the fact is, we don't know how many potential murderers are deterred.

            It certainly has to do with justice and security. We simply argue over whether it is the right response to murder, and if the government should have such power. I would answer No to both questions, but most Americans would probably say Yes.

            1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

              I contend that it aide neither justice nor security. Not justice for the reasons I mentioned above and not security because if you are executing the DP then the person is already under your control and therefor no longer a threat to security. As for the deterrent effect i believe there has been little demonstrated in the research that has been done on the topic. Regardless, the difference in deterrent effects of life vs DP are likely to be quite small/insignificant.

              1. Brett L   11 years ago

                Pretty sure the recidivism rate of dead people is zero. Now, the recidivism rate of live people may approach the same.

                1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

                  Was talking about life in prison not life in general. The recidivism rate of people in prison is zero with the exception of prison crimes.

              2. MJGreen   11 years ago

                I don't know if it furthers justice, but I don't think it's unjust, either. If a person has made it clear that he has no regard for the lives of others, I don't think we owe any regard to his life. It's hard to believe the world is a worse place without him (though it's certainly possible), nor do I think it degrades 'our' moral character.

                That said, you need to be damn sure that the person is guilty.

            2. Mock-star   11 years ago

              If the Death Penalty is going to act as a deterrent to other would-be murders, wouldnt the state have incentive to make executions public spectacle?

          2. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

            the DP is nothing but simple revenge.

            Retribution is an element of nearly all criminal penalties.

            The indictments of the death penalty generally apply to some degree to all criminal penalties.

            The challenge for DP opponents is to show that, even though the DP shares its flaws with criminal penalties generally, the DP should nonetheless be barred but those other penalties should not.

    3. The Last American Hero   11 years ago

      Nation of laws and all that.

  26. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

    Mayor tells atheist group he "cannot allow" access to public space by a group "intending to ? discourage the practice of religion"

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....-religion/

    1. John   11 years ago

      Everyone should have access. That said, if religious groups can't get access, anti religious groups should be prevented too. Banning religion from public, means banning anti-religion too.

      1. PM   11 years ago

        Everybody knows you deny permits for rallies you don't want by deferring to public safety and inadequate security.

        1. John   11 years ago

          Yes. It is always bullshit.

    2. Tonio   11 years ago

      Oh, that bozo is going to cost the taxpayers in his jurisdiction a lot of money.

  27. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

    The two-hour-long death of convicted murder Joseph R. Wood III has renewed calls for the abolition of the death penalty.

    Why should I give shit if this scum bag suffered before he died?

    1. Tonio   11 years ago

      Because, Vag, it could be you strapped to that table next time. The conviction process isn't infallible.

  28. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    people should face the reality of what execution is: cold blooded killing.

    Revenge murder.

    1. John   11 years ago

      So fucking what? You say that like it is a bad thing. If you break in my house and threaten me, I will murder you too. But so fucking what? Some people need killing. Kids die of cancer every day. Spare me tears for the death of some asshole who did it to himself by killing others.

      1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

        "of some asshole who did it to himself by killing others."

        As determined by out government, who always get things right in other matters!

        1. PM   11 years ago

          Juries are almost universally the finders of guilt or innocence, not the government itself.

          1. PM   11 years ago

            (For whatever that's worth. It's not like juries have never gotten it wrong)

            There are, of course, wildly varying degrees of certainty of guilt. That juries sometimes fuck up doesn't make every convicted killer a victim of the system when he finally exits stage right after 25 years in prison.

          2. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

            Its true that juries are involved, its also true that they are involved via a government organized and run process, and of course the decision to charge, or not, a capital crime is solely the decision of one elected politician each time.

            1. PM   11 years ago

              You can always convene a citizen grand jury, it just has no enforcement power. The government monopoly on force is kind of a defining feature of government. I'm pretty sure you've come down on the size of the legitimacy of the legal system and that foundation before.

              Also, half the states still use the grand jury system, so charging decisions at least theoretically aren't in the hands of a single person.

              1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

                That's pretty theoretical, remember the quote about the grand jury and ham sandwiches.

                1. PM   11 years ago

                  I'd love to go back to private prosecutions and a legitimate grand jury system. Although I don't think it would really resolve any of your objections.

                  1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

                    I certainly agree that a return to the more traditional role of the grand jury would be nice.

        2. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

          So you're an anarchist now Bo?

          Or is it just that Joooos dominate the criminal justice system?

          1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

            Work it Rev. Al, work it!

        3. John   11 years ago

          YEs juries. But show me where this guy was innocent and then we can talk sympathy.

      2. Zeb   11 years ago

        I think revenge is a bad thing. If people worried less about getting even with people who harmed them or their relations in the past, the world would be a much better place.

        1. PM   11 years ago

          If "ifs" and "buts" were candy and nuts we'd all have a merry Christmas. The entire purpose of the criminal justice system is punitive.

          1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

            Punishment is not necessarily revenge. It could be about deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation, etc.,

          2. Zeb   11 years ago

            I don't think that necessarily means it is about revenge, though. Once the bad person is removed from polite society, further unprovoked violence is unjustified.

            Anyway, everything about being a libertarian is all "ifs" and "buts". Achieving anything close to a minarchist government is about as likely as convincing everyone to give up on revenge. So I'm going to stick with that.

            1. PM   11 years ago

              Personally, I think deterrence and rehabilitation are pretty much bullshit in terms of criminal justice. I don't think they're legitimate ends in the first place, and they don't seem to work very well anyway. The purpose of civil law is restoration of the victim, the purpose of criminal law is punishment of the guilty. The distinction between retribution and revenge is mostly semantic. At an individual level it may be better to forgive. At the institutional level I think justice demands retribution for certain offenses (representing a small subset of the current list of criminal offenses).

              1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

                Wait, I thought the purpose of civil law was bankrupting corporations with extreme jury awards?

              2. Zeb   11 years ago

                I see the purpose of prison more as removing people who can't play nice from society.
                I can't deny that I get some satisfaction when people get what they deserve, but I don't think that alone justifies imprisoning or executing someone.

              3. Zeb   11 years ago

                I also think that the idea that punishment or retribution is the legitimate purpose of criminal justice is one that is not completely obviously true. It is probably in some sense justified, but I think that you need to look beyond that and ask what good it does. If it doesn't provide some good (such as deterrence or rehabilitation of criminals) to society in general, should it be done anyway? If so why? I'm not saying I know the answers to those questions for sure, but they need to be addressed.

                1. PM   11 years ago

                  IMO, an asshole getting his comeuppance is a good in itself. On a practical level, it's hard to argue that any form of imprisonment does good from a strictly utilitarian standpoint. Even in terms of public safety it probably ends up being a wash by the time you factor in second order effects.

                2. Jerryskids   11 years ago

                  If the purpose of criminal justice is rehabilitation or removing from civil society someone who has demonstrated an inability or unwillingness to live civilly in said society, what do we do with someone who has committed a one-off crime? It seems wrong that someone who is otherwise an upstanding citizen, upon it being discovered that 30 years ago murdered his wife or robbed a bank, should face no consequences for his actions just because it was demonstrably a one-time, never-to-be-repeated offense. But punishment or retribution doesn't seem to fit with the idea that the government is doing something to you in return for your having done something to someone else.

                  Perhaps what bothers me is the whole 'monopoly on the distribution of justice' thing. If you steal my car, the government sends you to jail for having broken the rule against stealing other peoples stuff, not because you stole my car. If you steal my car, why shouldn't I be able to come to your house with some friends of mine and get my car back, along with leaving you a lump on your head or a couple of extra orifices?

        2. lap83   11 years ago

          The chaotic nature of revenge is why capital punishment evolved. "eye for an eye" was a compromise because the victims families wanted to rain revenge down on the murderer and everyone associated with him.

          1. Zeb   11 years ago

            Well, I like to think that maybe things could evolve a bit more. "Eye for an eye" was a great innovation in its time.

      3. The Last American Hero   11 years ago

        Then let's amend our laws to allow for cruelty in punishment.

        You are really missing the point, which is that a government that is too incompetent to properly execute someone should probably not be trusted with the power to apply the death penalty.

        1. John   11 years ago

          But they are competent to lock someone in a cage for decades? You are missing the point. If you don't trust the government to administer the death penalty, you don't trust them to administer any justice system. So unless you are an anarchist, your position doesn't work.

          1. lap83   11 years ago

            this.

            1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

              No...not THIS. The government being incompetent to imprison someone is something that can have restitution applied if and when the government is found in the wrong AS HAPPENS A LOT. That option is off the table for the innocents that are killed by government.

          2. Zeb   11 years ago

            I don't trust them to administer any justice system fairly and without serious mistakes. That's why I like the things they do in the justice system not to be permanent and irreversible.
            You don't have to believe that any government is completely illegitimate to think this way. You just have to see that governments are run by fallible and often corrupt individuals.

            1. ?nus   11 years ago

              Time is irreversible.

              1. Zeb   11 years ago

                You know what I mean. Yeah, wrongful imprisonment can't be undone either, but at least there is something that can be done.

          3. thom   11 years ago

            If I'm ever falsely accused of murder, I'll take the life in prison option over the strapped to a gurney and injected with lethal chemicals option any day.

          4. Idle Hands   11 years ago

            "Only the Sith deal in absolutes."

            -Obi Wan Kenobi

    2. Brett L   11 years ago

      Socially managed revenge murder to discourage blood feuds. It didn't come from nowhere.

  29. Bardas Phocas   11 years ago

    Opening ceremony for Commonwealth games go surreal.
    "Personally I felt the ceremony was a brilliant representation of Scotland's rich history of caning loads of mind-altering drugs."
    http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/.....4072488874

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Did the Scottish golfer on Bugs Bunny, Myers doing 'if it's not Scottish it's crap!' and Groundskeeper Willie make an appearance?

  30. TwB   11 years ago

    OT, but thanks to the folks who showed up at last night's DC area Reason meetup. I think a good time was had by all, except for my liver and my brain. They're upset with me today.

    1. NoVAHockey   11 years ago

      Where did you go?

      1. TwB   11 years ago

        O'Shaughnessey's Pub in Old Town Alexandria. Dive bar above a NY style Deli. Kinda small but it's a good spot to hang out, if you don't mind cigarette smoke.

        1. NoVAHockey   11 years ago

          oh yeah. right on King. good times.

  31. Zeb   11 years ago

    Two cops fired for beating the shit out of a prisoner.

    One has been charged with assault too. It took a while, but it's nice to see something go that way. Interested to see what happens with the guy who was charged with assault.

    1. The Last American Hero   11 years ago

      Don't worry, I'm sure the union will get things straitened out.

      1. Andrew S.   11 years ago

        And even if they can't, the prosecutor will decide it's too difficult and won't do anything about it.

      2. Zeb   11 years ago

        I've heard a bunch of stories about this and so far no union guys making excuses for it. I'll remain cautiously optimistic.

  32. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

    Ever wondered how you end up on the terror watch list?

    Among other things, if you're on the list, expect them to rifle thru your stuff at any given chance.

    In addition to data like fingerprints, travel itineraries, identification documents and gun licenses, the rules encourage screeners to acquire health insurance information, drug prescriptions, "any cards with an electronic strip on it (hotel cards, grocery cards, gift cards, frequent flyer cards)," cellphones, email addresses, binoculars, peroxide, bank account numbers, pay stubs, academic transcripts, parking and speeding tickets, and want ads. The digital information singled out for collection includes social media accounts, cell phone lists, speed dial numbers, laptop images, thumb drives, iPods, Kindles, and cameras. All of the information is then uploaded to the TIDE database.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      Screeners are also instructed to collect data on any "pocket litter," scuba gear, EZ Passes, library cards, and the titles of any books, along with information about their condition?"e.g., new, dog-eared, annotated, unopened." Business cards and conference materials are also targeted, as well as "anything with an account number" and information about any gold or jewelry worn by the watchlisted individual. Even "animal information"?details about pets from veterinarians or tracking chips?is requested. The rulebook also encourages the collection of biometric or biographical data about the travel partners of watchlisted individuals.

    2. PM   11 years ago

      Ever wondered how you end up on the terror watch list?

      Not for a second. I presume visiting this site is more than sufficient.

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      "To meet the REASONABLE SUSPICION standard, the NOMINATOR, based on the totality of the circumstances, must rely upon articulable intelligence or information which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrants a determination that an individual is known or suspected to be or has been knowingly engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to TERRORISM and/or TERRORIST ACTIVITIES."

      "In determining whether a REASONABLE SUSPICION exists, due weight should be given to the specific reasonable inferences that a NOMINATOR is entitled to draw from the facts in light of his/her experience and not on unfounded suspicions or hunches. Although irrefutable evidence or concrete facts are not necessary, to be reasonable, suspicion should be as clear and as fully developed as circumstances permit."

      Chopped word salad for the win.

      1. John   11 years ago

        It doesn't matter what standard they use. There is no way to know you are on the list or anyway to challenge your being on it if you did know. Without oversight, the standards are meaningless. The standard is "put whoever the person nominating wants to put on there".

        The entire thing boils down to FUTY or to put their spin on it, "trust us".

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

          The guidelines document is officially unclassified but has never been released until now as the government has fought tooth and nail to keep it secret. Kafka would be proud.

        2. PRX   11 years ago

          I'd like to nominate FUTY as the new standard acronym for what we know John meant.

      2. Ted S.   11 years ago

        They actually used the phrase "totality of the circumstances"? Did Dunphy write that?

    4. John   11 years ago

      Most people would be appalled by this if they knew. Thanks to our sorry ass boot licking ignorant media, most people have no idea this is going on.

      Remember, they are able to get away with this first because they are able to do it with little notice. And they are only able to do that because of our ignorant, craven media.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

        In 2012 Tim Healy, the former director of the FBI's Terrorist Screening Center, described to CBS News how watchlists are used by police officers. "So if you are speeding, you get pulled over, they'll query that name," he said. "And if they are encountering a known or suspected terrorist, it will pop up and say call the Terrorist Screening Center?. So now the officer on the street knows he may be dealing with a known or suspected terrorist." Of course, the problem is that the "known or suspected terrorist" might just be an ordinary citizen who should not be treated as a menace to public safety.

        What could possibly go wrong?

        1. John   11 years ago

          I work in this field. Having what some redneck flatfoot who pulls you over considers "Islamist Literature" in your car can get you on this list. It is insane.

          1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

            So my handy dandy Arabic pocket dictionary would do the trick?

            1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

              *Scruffy starts to consider whether he can score points by turning someone in to the DHS*

    5. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      Not even death provides a guarantee of getting off the list. The guidelines say the names of dead people will stay on the list if there is reason to believe the deceased's identity may be used by a suspected terrorist?which the National Counterterrorism Center calls a "demonstrated terrorist tactic." In fact, for the same reason, the rules permit the deceased spouses of suspected terrorists to be placed onto the list after they have died.

      1. thom   11 years ago

        Shouldn't every dead person be put on the list at death. The fact that you've died should be a pretty big clue to the cops that you're up to something.

        1. Mock-star   11 years ago

          Just tell them youre on your way to the voting booth!

    6. John   11 years ago

      Get this

      In a recent court filing, the government disclosed that there were 468,749 KST nominations in 2013, of which only 4,915 were rejected?a rate of about one percent. The rulebook appears to invert the legal principle of due process, defining nominations as "presumptively valid."

      There are 468,749 suspected terrorists? There haven't been that many terrorists in the entire history of the world.

      And remember the incentive structure here. Even if they are not abusing this and are trying to do the right thing, they have every reason to list as many people as possible since there is no downside to listing but a huge downside to not listing the person and later have it turn out that they were a terrorist.

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        No, there are only 463,834 suspected terrorists. Our overlords magnanimously scratched 4,915 of them off the list.

        1. John   11 years ago

          Worse still, there is no way even the Soviets could "watch" that many people. So it is nothing but an official harassment list. It does nothing to prevent terrorism.

          1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

            It's bureaucratic CYA. They were on the list! We were doing our job!

            Of course, if everyone is on the list....

            1. John   11 years ago

              That is exactly what it is. Actual counter terrorism is hard. Making lists and creating databases is easy. So that is what they do.

              1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

                You would think it would work the other way - he was on your list and he still [did something terrorist-y]!!!!!!!!

                1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

                  As long as the paperwork was properly filled out, there will never be any repercussions for a bureaucrat.

                  1. John   11 years ago

                    But Scruffy, there will be repercussions for their politically appointed masters.

                    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

                      there will be repercussions for their politically appointed masters.

                      Prove it. I'm not seeing much of it lately.

                2. John   11 years ago

                  Yes, it can work that way. They are basically screwed either way. But, they figure they are better off putting them on the list and then they can blame the cops. "Hey man, we put him on the list, why didn't you stop him?"

  33. db   11 years ago

    Weather reports from the vicinity of the Air Algerie disappearance showed probable severe thunderstorms with cumulonimbus clouds extending up to 49000 feet. They would have had to go way, way around that, not over it. You don't fuck with thunderstorms.

    1. db   11 years ago

      Sorry, sandstorms in this case.

      1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

        Thundersand!

    2. TwB   11 years ago

      I was wondering if the plane was struck by lightning or possibly experienced some really strong crosswinds that forced it down. Still, yet another airplane issue this month. Hopefully this plane is found and maybe some folks survived, but I doubt it based on the terrain where it went missing.

      1. db   11 years ago

        Well, winds across a course aren't going to make much difference at cruising altitude. Thunderstorms and CB clouds are highly dangerous, and not to be tricked with. There are reports that the pilots requested a course deviation to avoid storms. Unfortunately, they may have been too late to get around or foolishly tried to get between storms.

        1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

          Shit.... http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/break.....er-1458125

          looks like everyone was lost.

  34. Warren   11 years ago

    ...U.S. Ninth Circuit Court Judge Alex Kosinski...
    That's Judge Alex Kozinski
    Alex Kosinski is er, different.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      And Alex Koszinski...still different.

  35. Matrix   11 years ago

    I want a lesbian love affair, but I don't want to leave my male partner

    I lost my virginity to the same man I have been with since I was 19. I'm now 26 and still very attracted to him, and can't imagine being with anyone else. But I've started visiting lesbian dating sites and mostly fantasise about women, though I feel guilty. Would it be wrong to ask my partner if I could experiment with women? I don't want to hurt people, but I crave a discreet but honest love affair with a woman.

    Obviously you are imagining being with someone else. Maybe not another man, but a woman is certainly someone else.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      If you're serious about it, ask your other for a three way. Otherwise, you're just looking to screw around on him.

      1. Zeb   11 years ago

        Or at least let him watch.

      2. Matrix   11 years ago

        Indeed. Some guys might not care about his SO messing around with other women. Some might find it a turn on, and want to watch or join. But plenty of others would not be cool with any of that.

        So, if the guy says "no way," you have to decide which means more to you--that relationship or the possibility of your lesbian tryst.

      3. Ted S.   11 years ago

        That's what I was thinking, too.

    2. SugarFree   11 years ago

      Leave the poor bastard now before his looks go and don't bankrupt him on the way out for something that is your fault. And if you can't have the decency to respect him this much, at least don't have any kids.

      1. John   11 years ago

        ^^THIS^^

        I have nothing against gays. But people who know or think they might be gay and get married to an opposite sex spouse anyway, are narcissistic scum.

        1. Rhywun   11 years ago

          people who know or think they might be gay and get married to an opposite sex spouse anyway, are narcissistic scum

          Or, they were raised in any one of numerous cultures where this happens every single day - is, in fact, expected.

          1. Zeb   11 years ago

            Yeah, I doubt that narcissism is often much of a motivation there. Rather the opposite, really. And some people really are bisexual.

          2. John   11 years ago

            In Afghanistan, sure. In 2014, America, not so much.

        2. Matrix   11 years ago

          My ahuvah has a cousin that is gay. He is marrying her arch-rival because he got her pregnant. But he does not want to really come out, and just wants to just try to "do it right" or whatever.

          I've said he needs to be honest, but she says he won't change his mind. He's only going to hurt himself, this woman, their child(ren), and their families.

          Now theirs is a very traditional Orthodox Jewish family, so he will likely have some fallout from coming out. But it's going to be much better than getting married and going through all of that.

    3. RBS   11 years ago

      I don't want to hurt people, but I crave a discreet but honest love affair with a woman.

      Can I have my cake and eat it too?

      1. PM   11 years ago

        Millennials can't even do affairs right. Jesus christ.

      2. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

        A girl I was dating this spring told me she didn't want a relationship, and I said that was OK. About 3 weeks later she complained that I was just using her for sex.

        1. TwB   11 years ago

          Was your response, Well then, why don't you make up your damn mind?

          1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

            It turns out she wanted both (not a relationship, but not just sex) at the same time. She wanted to have her cake and eat it too.

            1. Tejicano   11 years ago

              Just tell her what you really wnt is the intimacy and honesty that comes with sex - not the sex itself. Think of all the other stuff that happens after you screw and say those are the things you enjoy - but they only happen after sex.

              1. PH2050   11 years ago

                Brilliant.

            2. Matrix   11 years ago

              Friends with benefits? I mean, you're still friends. Still hang out. Maybe no romantic shit and going on dates. But still friends with a little extra on the side? Or did she want more than that?

              Or more like, she wanted a relationship, but didn't want to be afraid of 'stepping out' and being called a cheater? Basically wanting you to treat it like a relationship, and she can do as she pleases?

              If the latter, that's definitely a deal breaker.

        2. PM   11 years ago

          Were you on campus on the time? If so, you might be a rapist.

        3. lap83   11 years ago

          That's code for she doesn't enjoy it most of the time. Sorry.

          1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

            Considering that she kept trying to get me to screw her after I'd decided her inconsistency wasn't worth dealing with, I doubt it.

          2. lap83   11 years ago

            I think what guys don't understand about girls is that the anticipation is usually way better than the act itself. Sex with no strings attached can seem great to a girl, until she's doing it. Then it sucks because guys who don't like a girl they're having sex with are usually terrible at it.

            1. SugarFree   11 years ago

              Sounds like Auric committed the unforgivable sin of not being able to read her mind.

              What an asshole you are, Auric.

              1. lap83   11 years ago

                There are differences between the genders. That's not exactly news, is it?

                1. SugarFree   11 years ago

                  Of course it isn't, but she could have told the poor lad what she was thinking instead of either lying to him, lying to herself or changing the rules mid-game without notification.

                  1. Clich? Bandit   11 years ago

                    I have had truly honest girlfriends tell me "Women are fucked up, including me sometimes." Seriously, in a rare lucid logical moment I had one say she has enough trouble dealing with her own comflicting desires there is no way she can communicate them to me MUCH LESS put up with a woman lover.

                    I felt much more secure in my mental capacity after that...it ISN"T me, cool.

              2. lap83   11 years ago

                I don't think he's an asshole, btw. I was just trying to give a possible female perspective.

      3. Pope Jimbo   11 years ago

        Cake? Is that the new slang for hair pie? I can't keep up with the lingo anymore...

    4. John   11 years ago

      I am pretty sure that at least a few husbands might go along, if they can watch.

      1. RBS   11 years ago

        Yeah, but she wants an "honest love affair" which to me means she also wants to be emotionally involved with other women. So you might get to watch two chicks get it on but the price will be two chicks hassling you when they aren't getting it on.

        1. John   11 years ago

          Yeah. I was being factious. She is gay and just won't admit it. She sucks.

        2. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

          What's an honest love affair? Sounds to me like just wants to muncha muncha. Love ain't got nothin' to do with it.

      2. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

        Pedantic, but I don't see anything suggesting that they are married.

        1. lap83   11 years ago

          Good point. This makes more sense then. It does sound more like a petty gf/bf problem than a typical marriage problem.

          1. NoVAHockey   11 years ago

            i'm very happily married. but some of my friends aren't -- and they have no intention of doing so. For them, the risk/reward calculation just doesn't make sense.

          2. PM   11 years ago

            6 years is common law in a lot of jurisdictions if they were living together. Thanks to the government, there's vanishingly few things that can still be regarded as petty gf/bf problems.

    5. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      "I believe it's called menage a trois..."

    6. lap83   11 years ago

      If she really wants to be "honest", she'll suggest an open marriage. I can't see any way he'd be OK with her having an affair without wanting to have one too.

  36. DEG   11 years ago

    His Pestilence declares that legal tax avoidance is akin to renouncing citizenship.

    1. TwB   11 years ago

      I'd prefer if he renounced his throne..uh, I mean, the Presidency of the United States.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      What an asshole.

    3. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

      Well, he's right. And an ethical government that respects the rights of the individual would allow its constituents that option. To suggest otherwise is the definition of serfdom.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

        So by taking advantage of the laws in place to minimize my tax burden, I'm effectively abandoning my country? Not sure what you're getting at here, HM.

        1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

          It's also legal for you to not donate to the treasury. So by not donating all your money to the treasury, you are abandoning the country.

        2. PM   11 years ago

          He's saying you should be allowed to renounce your citizenship. You're technically allowed to do so now, but it is very difficult, and the government will ensure you are as close to bankrupt on your way out the door as they possibly can.

        3. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

          What I'm saying is that many countries allow one to renounce one's citizenship quite easily if one is living abroad. For a developed country, the United States makes the process of renouncing citizenship draconian. Indeed, it is not even a right, but completely up to the fiat of whatever consular officer is reviewing your case. There is a word for that, it begins with "S" and rhymes with "Lavery"

          1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

            Glebae adscripti? 🙂

            1. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

              It works as long as you remember to keep that final vowel long.

          2. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

            Point taken

          3. thom   11 years ago

            You shouldn't even have to "renounce" your citizenship. If somebody stops paying their taxes and moves out of the country, they should just be quietly dropped from the rolls.

            1. Matrix   11 years ago

              It's the opposite of Hotel California. You can leave any time you like, but you can never checkout.

    4. SugarFree   11 years ago

      Of course, Not My Fault doesn't mention that the US still goes after you for danegeld even if you do renounce your citizenship.

      America owns you, boy.

  37. Matrix   11 years ago

    National Science Foundation is giving $10 million to build robot companions for children

    I'm sure the child Sheldon Coopers will appreciate the effort, so they can actually have friends.

    The National Science Foundation has committed $10 million to build robots that will act as "personal trainers" for children, in an effort to influence their behavior and eating habits.

    Of course Mrs. Obama had her input...

    1. TwB   11 years ago

      So if the kid decides to eat a bag of Doritos in secret and the robot finds the kid doing that evil deed, does the robot dish out punishment? I'm sure MO would just love that.

      1. Rhywun   11 years ago

        does the robot dish out punishment

        What could possibly go wrong in that scenario.

        1. Mercutio   11 years ago

          I'll just leave this here.

      2. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

        "Mom, the robot trainer gave me bad touch!"

  38. Sevo   11 years ago

    As a surprise to those who forget the sun rises in the east, we offer:
    "California climate change policies to hit pocketbooks"
    http://www.sfgate.com/default/.....642825.php

    Money pull-quote:
    "Among respondents making less than $40,000, 77 percent support cutting fuel emissions. That number falls to 32 percent if lowering emissions forces them to pay more."
    Gee, you mean WE have to pay for that?!

    1. PM   11 years ago

      Coincidentally also from the Bay area:

      "Of course, I want people to have health care, I just didn't realize I would be the one who was going to pay for it personally

      1. Sevo   11 years ago

        Hey, Obo and Moonbeam promised free shit!

      2. Rhywun   11 years ago

        Well, at least lots of people who don't know what "socialism" is are now getting a first-hand lesson.

      3. JW   11 years ago

        I've probably seen that before, but it drains my schadenfreude tank every time.

        Of course, I won't be satisfied until they're ruined financially. But, by then, we all will be as well.

  39. John   11 years ago

    http://www.laweekly.com/2014-0.....alifornia/

    There are advantages to the internet. One of them is that hopefully will allow people to make Supervisory Park Ranger Bonnie Clarfield's life miserable and subject her to public shame and humiliation.

    1. tarran   11 years ago

      What makes the situation delicious is that he is one of the assholes who tried to turn that land into National Park in the first place.

    2. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

      Is Bonnie the problem, or the ADA who decided Gladwin's actions were a major crime spree worth spunking away public resources to stop? Either way, they only do it because they hate Australians, so fuck them

      1. John   11 years ago

        Bonnie is only part of the problem. That is true.

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      The prosecutor is engaging in pure revenge for the crime of refusing to take the plea bargain and as such, should be disbarred.

    4. SugarFree   11 years ago

      Why in the fuck is a leash violation a criminal matter?

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

        Because authority was denied. Contempt of prosecutor occurred.

        1. SugarFree   11 years ago

          Why didn't they just shoot this monster?!? And his weapon of mass wagging?

    5. Steve G   11 years ago

      *sigh*
      ...Until one reads the comments, as usual

    6. JW   11 years ago

      I'm through giving a fuck for people who have been victimized by the system they happily helped to create.

      Cry me a fucking river or do something about cleaning up the shit sandwich you created.

  40. John   11 years ago

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/.....y0.twitter

    According to Democrats on the FEC, publishing a book that might promote your campaign should not be allowed. That is right, you shouldn't be able to publish a book because it might support a political cause or candidate.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      They want nothing short of total government control over elections and speech.

    2. SugarFree   11 years ago

      I'm sure Hillary will be immediately sanctioned for the coffetable turd she published.

      1. John   11 years ago

        Of course not. Her book is serious personal history not some tea bagging piece of political trash like Ryan's book.

      2. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

        There were no sumptuous photo spreads in it, so technically it was a bedside table turd

        1. SugarFree   11 years ago

          I don't think anyone actually read it, but just bought it to display as a class signal.

          Which makes all the e-reader sales a twisted form of penance.

          1. John   11 years ago

            I doubt anyone other than her ghost writer and their editor has ever read that book. I would bet you good money Hillary has never read it.

            1. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

              It took a village to write it

            2. JW   11 years ago

              I know people who probably read and rubbed one out while doing so.

              1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

                Tony and shriek?

      3. Idle Hands   11 years ago

        A book for coffee tables about coffee tables.

    3. PM   11 years ago

      Freedom of the press doesn't even apply to the literal press anymore. We're through the looking glass here people.

      1. John   11 years ago

        Remember, Citizens United that they hate so much was about a group that made a movie criticizing a political candidate.

        1. NoVAHockey   11 years ago

          That such as thing was even an issue is just depressing.

        2. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

          Has anyone investigated to see if Lerner & Co. had their fingerprints on that one? She was in the FEC until a few years ago.

  41. Rich   11 years ago

    Race-based university grading

    It calls for "proportional participation of historically underrepresented racial-ethnic groups at all levels of an institution, including ... in the distribution of grades."

    Just give every American resident a Ph.D and be done with it already.

    1. John   11 years ago

      Because that would require giving white males PHDs. Check your privilege Rich.

      1. Rich   11 years ago

        It'd be OK, John, because everyone would know simply by looking that it wasn't a *real* Ph.D.

        1. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

          Really? Because plenty of people are hired despite attending Yale.

          I keed, I keed.

          1. Rich   11 years ago

            "When were you in Yale?"

            "Oh, I yust got out."

            1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

              http://www.dilbert.com/fast/1994-12-26/

    2. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

      Yeah, the day my university tells me to factor race in my grading is the day they will have a long and expensive grievance suit to deal with as they attempt to look for loopholes in the tenure process.

      1. John   11 years ago

        There is no way such a system would stand up in court. You have an equal protection right in fair grading from a state run school.

        Of course progs don't think white makes are entitled to Constitutional rights.

        1. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

          You have an equal protection right in fair grading from a state run school.

          Well, my school is private.

          1. John   11 years ago

            But they are a public accommodation and subject to the CRA.

            1. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

              True.

      2. Raven Nation   11 years ago

        Exactly. We have to put up with enough shit in the hiring process.

    3. PM   11 years ago

      Reason covered that one a couple days ago:

      http://reason.com/blog/2014/07.....tribute-gr

      1. Rich   11 years ago

        Damn. Sorry!

        1. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

          Don't apologise, damn you. You're a Reason tribute poster, or something

          1. Rich   11 years ago

            Note to self: Use less-subtle sarcasm.

    4. db   11 years ago

      Do they mean "distribution" in the statistical sense, or in the sense of "handing out?" Because grades are supposed to be earned, not assigned.

      *teehee*

      1. Raven Nation   11 years ago

        Yeah, I always make that point to my students.

        Student: Professor, I want to talk about this D you gave me on the paper.

        Me: Oh, I didn't give you a D, you earned that all by yourself.

        Most of them don't appreciate that.

        1. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

          Ha! That's choice

  42. Anon E. Mouse   11 years ago

    "Wood was given a lethal injection in an Arizona prison on Wednesday, but did not die for another two hours."

    Play stupid games; win stupid prizes.

    1. PH2050   11 years ago

      Indeed. No sympathy from me for this game contestant.

    2. Tejicano   11 years ago

      Reading what this guy pretty-much-undoubtedly did to earn that sentence, six hours would have been better than two.

  43. db   11 years ago

    Hey, HyR veterans! Love to hear your take on Senator John Walsh's PTSD defense for plagiarizing his US Army War College Master's thesis.

    1. SugarFree   11 years ago

      You me'd the link.

      1. db   11 years ago

        Senator John Walsh's PTSD defense for plagiarizing his US Army War College Master's thesis.

        1. Rich   11 years ago

          Nice.

        2. SugarFree   11 years ago

          Goes to a 404.

          1. db   11 years ago

            What can I say, I'm stressed here!

        3. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

          F him and the horse he rode in on. Take his commission, break his sword and set him facing backward on a mule and slow walk it out the front gate of Fort Lee.

          1. Pathogen   11 years ago

            156 Episodes.. the bulk Of series

            1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

              A short, but effective story from the Oxford Book of Military Anecdotes. #70:

              How to sack a divisional commander: Tewkesbury, 4 May 1471.

              Lord Wenlock not having advanced to the support of the first line, but remaining stationary, contrary to the expectations of Somerset, the latter, in a rage, rode up to him, reviled him and beat his brains out with an axe.

          2. DeOppressoLiber   11 years ago

            ^ This. He was a battalion commander (of a fucking NG unit) during his time in Iraq. It is highly unlikely that he ever personally participated in combat. Battalion Commanders are given combat infantry badges when their unit gets into a fight, because it would look bad for all his subordinates to come back decorated and the commander not.
            I know I should be thankful that this generation of veterans is treated better than Vietnam era veterans, but all of this PTSD BS is creating a new, different, but still negative stereotype that the rest of us have to overcome during job interviews, etc.

            1. PH2050   11 years ago

              Agreed. What a fucking insult that this BC is called a "decorated war hero"...LMFAO! Like those guys EVER go on a patrol. The most ours did (USMC) was make the whole battalion do tons of forced marches - stateside. Of course, he came to the BAS beforehand for shots of NSAIDs to his knees (which we were supposed to keep a secret) and then berates other Marines whose legs couldn't take it. But go outside the wire with us, a line company? Yeah, right!

              Here's a little secret about this whole PTSD thing: they'll give that diagnosis to anyone, almost automatically, if you were in a combat situation and later have problems sleeping, anxiety, depression, etc. It's like the new ADHD but for veterans who, like DOL states above, may have been in a unit that was awarded a Combat Action Ribbon, EVEN IF THEY NEVER ACTUALLY SAW COMBAT. I was medical and saw this firsthand.

              Doesn't stop me from exploiting the gullible troop-worshipers, though...yes, I'll take free stuff and retail store/restaurant discounts, gladly 😉

        4. Drake   11 years ago

          Was he suffering from PTSD when he became a Democrat?

    2. Rich   11 years ago

      Hier.

      1. db   11 years ago

        Yay!

      2. SugarFree   11 years ago

        "John Walsh is a decorated war hero, and it's disgusting that Steve Daines and Washington Republicans are going to try to denigrate John's distinguished service after multiple polls show him gaining," Barasky said.

        But I bet Justin Barasky chortles and touches himself every time Rachel Maddow accuses Rand Paul of plagiarism.

    3. Rich   11 years ago

      "I don't want to blame my mistake on PTSD, but I do want to say it may have been a factor," the senator said. "My head was not in a place very conducive to a classroom and an academic environment."

      Very well, Senator. Simply relinquish that Master's degree. You can try again now that you're better.

      1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

        But he is perfectly suited to be a Senator!

    4. John   11 years ago

      They take that shit seriously normally. I can't believe they didn't kick him out. He must have been one hell of an ass kissing crony.

    5. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      The Army War College is sure going to be sympathetic to someone who blamed his misbehavior on the tragic incidents of Army service.

      /sarc

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

        (I'm not actually a veteran, but I have an interest in a thesis making policy recommendations)

    6. Steve G   11 years ago

      It's a non-defense; no sympathy here. The type of plagiarizing he did was deliberate. If he was struggling, all he had to do was talk to the faculty and they would have bent over backwards to get him through. If Army's like the other services, they aren't in the business of failing people who are making the slightest honest effort. "Gentleman's 'B'"

  44. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Love to hear your take on Senator John Walsh's PTSD defense for plagiarizing his US Army War College Master's thesis.

    IT WAS JUST A TYPO!

    1. NoVAHockey   11 years ago

      no .. drafting error. the intent and history is obvious.

      1. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

        Curse you!

    2. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

      "drafting error"

      /borrows from O!care defenders

    3. PH2050   11 years ago

      What difference, at this point, does it make?

  45. Swiss Servator, Alles Klar   11 years ago

    Most ethical administration evah!

    http://dailysignal.com/2014/07.....-scrutiny/

    1. Rich   11 years ago

      Nothing these clowns do surprises me anymore.

      TTFN

    2. db   11 years ago

      http://m.whitehouse.gov/the-pr.....-personnel

    3. Mainer2   11 years ago

      Ethics Waiver.

      That such a thing exists tells you everything you need to know about the state of our republic.

      Can I get one of those for use in my private employment ? I could engage in some double-dealing and embezzlement, and if caught, just pull out my handy Ethics Waiver.

  46. jmomls   11 years ago

    I think they should go back to executing people by having an elephant stomp on them.

  47. Chen Kuan Tai   11 years ago

    Botched lethal injection? He's dead, isn't he?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Supreme Court Said States Can't Discriminate in Alcohol Sales. They're Doing It Anyway.

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 5.24.2025 7:00 AM

Cocaine Hippos, Monkey Copyrights, and a Horse Named Justice: The Debate Over Animal Personhood

C.J. Ciaramella | From the June 2025 issue

Harvard's Best Protection Is To Get Off the Federal Teat

Autumn Billings | 5.23.2025 6:16 PM

Trump's Mass Cancellation of Student Visas Illustrates the Lawlessness of His Immigration Crackdown

Jacob Sullum | 5.23.2025 5:30 PM

Come July, Keys Will Be De Facto Illegal In Minnesota

Christian Britschgi | 5.23.2025 5:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!