Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Elizabeth Nolan Brown on the Next Hobby Lobby

Reason Staff | 7.8.2014 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Seth Anderson/Flickr
(Seth Anderson/Flickr)
Eden Foods/Facebook

Eden Foods is an organic food business that's been operating out of Michigan since the 1960s. Eden's president and sole shareholder, Michael Potter, is anti-GMO, pro-macrobiotic diet, and believes in "full transparency–complete disclosure of ingredients and all handling" for Eden's products, which include things like mung beans, buckwheat noodles, plum vinegar, and dried sea vegetables. It's not unfair to describe the company as exactly what conservatives would dream up if they were parodying an organic foods brand—except for one thing: Potter is a Roman Catholic who says certain forms of birth control are abortion.

Potter's lawsuit against the Health and Human Services contraception mandate is one of three that the U.S. Supreme Court has ordered to be reviewed in wake of its June 30 decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby. Of course, these three case are just the tip of the proverbial iceberg, Elizabeth Nolan Brown writes. Nearly 100 lawsuits against the mandate are pending, state legislatures are getting involved, and the White House is also threatening action. But this controversy only exists because the government has made birth control, and all sorts of health services, an appropriate subject of state and corporate concern, Brown argues. More laws trying to compel business owners to run their companies in a certain way won't get us anywhere but more court battles. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: A Rainbow Whopper Is Exactly What Gay Liberation Is, Actually

Reason Staff
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (0)

Latest

House Republicans Just Voted To Give Even More Tariff Power Away to Trump

Jack Nicastro | 9.17.2025 4:00 PM

Jonathan Haidt: Kids Should Put Down the Phones and Take More Risks

John Stossel | 9.17.2025 2:40 PM

Trump's $15 Billion Lawsuit Against The New York Times Is His Craziest One Yet

Joe Lancaster | 9.17.2025 2:25 PM

'The Free Market Is Handling It Just Fine': How Left and Right Responded to Charlie Kirk's Murder

Robby Soave | 9.17.2025 12:45 PM

Parents Still Lose Kids to Discredited 'Shaken Baby' Claims

Lenore Skenazy | 9.17.2025 12:25 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300