Brickbat: Banned in Heber City

Some students from Utah's Wasatch High School and their parents are upset that the girls' photos were altered in their yearbook. The yearbook staff covered up the exposed shoulders and collarbones of females in some photos, though not all of them. They also covered up one girl's visible tattoo. Wasatch County School Superintendent Terry E. Shoemaker defended the alterations but said staffers should have been more consistent.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Those whorish shoulders are Satan's lures. They could turn a Mormon Baptist
it's the ankles that are the worstest...
What, no niqab? This is yet more evidence that America is sliding into the abyss of sick-ular lie-beralism.
It's worse than you think their swim team uniforms show leg up to the knees!
Remarkable saggies.
Wasatch County School Superintendent Terry E. Shoemaker defended the alterations but said staffers should have been more consistent.
So they should have censored everybody.
I presume, being Wasatch County schools, these are government schools. Once again, the state is the biggest bully of them all.
Fucked up.
Hehe if there's a better way to tell which girls are likely to be easily led into making bad decisions then "visible tattoo obtained before the age of 19", I don't know what it is.
I generally found the best indicator was they were willing to talk to me.
when girls scream "GO AWAY YOU CREEP",that's not talking to you, FYI.
And when they do that, don't try to commiserate with them about being "O.T.R."
Who is the guy here who would spend time photoshopping the pictures to expose MORE skin? Was that Warty? Or Old man/candy?
They could always do what I did... or actually didn't. Don't get a year book picture taken.
I was the type of guy that if the school asked me to do something stupid, I'd do the opposite.
That's right.
Fuck off.
So even if the opposite action was just as stupid, you'd take the contrarian route?
stupid is, as stupid does. and there's all sorts of stupid.
I thought I kept those pictures in my "private" collection.
Any topless year book photos?
The yearbook staff covered up the exposed shoulders and collarbones of females in some photos, though not all of them.
It's obviously voodoo. The staff is trying to give the uncovered females *skin cancer*.
Looking back, how are they going to remember who the sluts and slatterns were?
If they signed my yearbook...
Well, not the slatterns. I like 'em freshly showered. Soap too, please. A nice coat of wax with a high buff is good too.
Since when are airbrushed yearbook photos newsworthy?