The Fallacy of Net Neutrality: Thomas Hazlett on the FCC & Consumer Protection
The FCC's recent decision to tolerate "internet fast lanes" has sparked outrage among many net neutrality advocates. However, as Reason's Peter Suderman wrote, the announcement amounts to nothing more than a vague proclamation from the FCC that it will be meddling in the business affairs of ISPs as it sees fit.
Watch Reason TV's interview with Thomas Hazlett, Reason contributor and George Mason economics professor, who unpacks the fallacy of a government regulatory agency trying to shape an industry of which it "has no idea what the optimal business model is."
Produced by Nick Gillespie and Josh Swain: "The Fallacy of Net Neutrality: Thomas Hazlett on the FCC & Consumer Protection"
Originally published on November 8, 2012. Original text is below:
"I'm very confident a hundred years from now we won't have an FCC," says Thomas Hazlett, Reason contributor and George Mason economics professor.
Internet service providers are coming under scrutiny from both the FCC and net neutrality supporters who want to ensure unrestricted consumer access to the Web. However, Hazlett points out that the fear over ISPs limiting Web content is unfounded and government "has no idea what the optimal business model is" to effectively regulate.
Hazlett sat down with Reason TV's Nick Gillespie to discuss net neutrality, the Internet, and and his Encounters Broadside book "The Fallacy of Net Neutrality."
Camera by Meredith Bragg and Josh Swain. Edited by Swain.
More from Reason on net neutrality and the FCC.
About 6 minutes.
Scroll down for downloadable versions and subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube Channel and receive automatic notifications when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"The Internet's rules of the road must not open up fast lanes to those who can pay, leaving others stuck in traffic," Markey said in an e-mail."
You bet! Keep everybody stuck in traffic! FAIR AND STUFF!!!!!
"FCC proposal called blow to net neutrality"
http://www.sfgate.com/default/.....427999.php
Yeah, here's a thought - why not?!
"I'm very confident a hundred years from now we won't have an FCC,"
Nice dream. Will we be rid of TVA by then too? I doubt either.