Property Rights

Bundy Ranch Showdown Not Over If Harry Reid Has Anything to Say About It

Raid may still be planned

|

Over the weekend, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced it would stop trying to enforce a court order against Cliven Bundy over grazing fees the agency says Bundy owes them. Cattle from the Bundy family ranch in Nevada, which has been in operation since the 1880s, graze on land claimed by the feds. The BLM confiscated some cattle, but may now reportedly share the revenue from selling that cattle with the Bundy family. Bundy threatened a "range war" over the issue.

Despite the BLM's announcement, Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) told local TV station KRNV that the showdown wasn't over. "We can't have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it," said Reid. "So it's not over." How involved is Reid with the drama at the Bundy ranch? The Washington Times reports:

Speculation on Mr. Reid's role in last week's confrontation at the ranch has been rife, given his prominent position as Nevada's elder statesman and his ties to BLM director Neil Kornze. 

Mr. Kornze, 35, served for eight years on the Senate leader's staff before joining the BLM in 2011. He was the Mr. Reid's pick to head the agency, and his final confirmation was April 8 as the roundup at the Bundy ranch was underway.

In an updated statement Saturday, Mr. Kornze said the cattle gather was halted "because of our grave concern about the safety of employees and members of the public."

Mr. Reid also has been accused of attempting to shut down the ranch in order to move ahead with two nearby solar energy projects, an accusation denied Monday by the senator's press aide.

Reid spokeswoman Kristen Orthman told KLAS-TV in Las Vegas that "there is no truth to the conspiracy theories that are being pushed by right-wing media outlets." Orthman's attack on "right-wing media outlets" and "conspiracy theories" may be a case of the lady protesting too much. Politicians on both sides of the aisle often make money hand over fist because of their connections to the feds and the insider information they have access to.

Bundy argues the land his family uses for cattle grazing actually belongs to the state of Nevada, whose laws permit them to graze on it. The feds and their apologists argue the federal government owns the land, or is holding it in trust "for all of us." Protesters who arrived to defend the Bundy family have declared victory, and the family hopes recent events may put pressure on a judge to rule in the state's favor. Bundy says he's now inspecting his cattle for possible damage by federal agents.

A raid on the ranch may still be being planned, according to the executive director of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association.

The feds control vast swaths of land in the West. Here is a map that shows the proportion of land the feds own in each state:

NEXT: Sonny Bunch on how the Department of Commerce Smothers Commerce

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Reid: This is MY state, motherfucker.

    1. They hang cattle rustlers. don’t they?

  2. LMAO. I wonder if these guys can even hear themselves.

    1. Yeah, if anyone can just violate the law and get away with it, then what are the actual perks of being in Congress?

  3. Any hope of credibility for these folks just flew out the window with those three magic letters: W-N-D…

  4. The federal mafia ought to be destroyed.

  5. That map should be titles “How The West Was Lost”

  6. And, this is a surprise because… http://www.infowars.com/breaki…..ndy-ranch/

  7. This is no accident. Obama’s Wild lands project is gobbling up more at a horrific pace. This is all in accordance to UN Agenda 21.
    Yes I know I sound like a conspiracy nut and I myself used to call people such when they brought it up. After a lot of research and concrete documentation from the Feds themselves I can say it is in full swing and the end result will be total and utter capitulation of our rights and freedoms. At least we will all be packed in easily managed city centers and have Joy Joy feelings that we are all cared for.
    Be Well.

  8. constitutional sherriffs association?lmao-WHACKJOBS

  9. “We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it,”

    Yeah, the NSA, FBI, ATF, DEA, state/county/local police, IRS, DHS, etc. have gotten away with it for too long and they can’t just walk away from it.

  10. Was I the only one who misread the headline as “Bunny Ranch”?

  11. Bundy is no hero and he should have any assets he has confiscated. There are 16,000 ranchers who pay their grazing fees. Bundy is not special.
    His statements that he does not acknowledge the federal government are exactly the same as if a person said they did not acknowledge the laws against murder.
    Reason needs to stop pretending the ownership of the land is in dispute. It is not and never has been.
    There is nothing here but a guy who thinks the rules only apply to others and to support him just marginalizes libertarians.

    1. Above I read a comment from someone who justified that Bundy violated the law because the federal government does it too in other scenarios. That is not libertarianism, that’s an excuse for criminal behavior justified in the mistakes of others.

    2. Actually Common Law awards him ownership of the land since he is the land’s cultivator and his family has been for over 100 years.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.