Icelanders Protest Government Decision to Withdraw EU Application Without Vote, Want to Vote it Down Themselves
Democracy and accountability


For the last three weeks, protesters in Iceland have demonstrated against the government's decision to retract Iceland's application for membership in the European Union. The government promised in elections last year to hold a referendum on the membership application. 21 percent of eligible voters in Iceland have signed a petition demanding the government keep its promise.
But the protests aren't necessarily pro-European. A recent Gallup poll in Iceland shows that while more than 70 percent of Icelanders want to hold a vote on E.U. membership, only 37 percent say they want to join the E.U., a dismal number that's nevertheless an improvement over the 27 percent that said they wanted to join the E.U. in 2010. Half a year before that poll, the Icelandic government voted to apply to the E.U. without a referendum, despite an earlier promise by the finance minister that no decision would be made without a vote by the people. Iceland's experience with letting banks fail and the antagonism toward that path displayed by several E.U. member states contributed to the broad lack of interest in joining the club.
Elections aren't something the E.U. is especially good at. In the mid-2000s, an effort to pass a European constitution bypassed popular voting in 14 member states. Of the four countries that voted on the Constitution, only voters in Spain supported ratifying the constitutional treaty by a supermajority (76 percent). Voters in Luxembourg approved it by a thirteen percent margin, while voters in France and the Netherlands voted against the constitutional treaty, effectively killing it. Nevertheless, the E.U. got most of what it wanted in the Lisbon Treaty, set up as a series of amendments of previous treaties in order to bypass the need for popular votes. Some realpoliticking Eurocrats in Brussels may be looking at the rushed vote in Crimea and wondering if there are any lessons for their inner tyrants to draw.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
God that EU constitution was an unholy mess.
I haven't read it, but I can only imagine what a horrorshow would come out of Europeans trying to write a basic charter of rights.
You have the right to do something unless the government says you can't.
Unfortunately, the exact same horrorshow that would come out of Americans if millennials tried to rewrite ours.
Because generations prior have done such a bang-up job, right?
I thought the colonial generation did an OK job.
Yeah. That one held up for a couple of generations, anyway. You could even make the case that the basic scheme was still intact until FDR.
I just took a quick look: it's only 219pp long and includes a "Right to Good Administration."
It's so cute when these little countries act out!
*pats Iceland on head*
We should annex it, like Russia is doing with Crimea. Just for parity, you know.
The British invade it in 1940 and the US invaded it in July 1941.
Great place to visit.
As much as I dislike having a decision made for a population by politicians, isn't it even more frightening to have people who can't begin to comprehend the implication of joining the EU voting on a decision like this?
Yeah but seeing how the politicians have screwed things up (for example letting Greece be part of the EURO) I don't see how regular voters can make it worse
The whole problem with the EU is that the people running it pretend that its about trade and economy when in fact its about creating a European State. So they keep on making decisions which they say is to expand trade and the economy but are in fact to expand the scope and power of the EU. And even their trade and economy policies are wrong since they try to manage a market.
Does anyone think that expanding the EU into Ukraine would be anything but a sinkhole of money, but the EU wants to because it fills a spot on their European State map.
Well, most of the votes have been against. That's why the politicians decided to make the votes parliamentary rather than referenda.
As much as I dislike having a decision made for a population by politicians voters, isn't it even more frightening to have people politicians who can't begin to comprehend the implication of joining the EU voting on making a decision like this?
How will the elves vote? Or are elves not allowed to vote? APARTHEID!
I would like to volunteer to cover the vote on behalf of Reason magazine... I volunteer to thoroughly... poll... the beautiful and - I understand - romantically aggressive viking lasses on this matter.
They crave your genetic diversity.
Bjork just waved you into her boudoir.
That's only because she wants to wrap him in a silk cocoon and liquify his organs.
I think you auto-corrected "pole", tarran.