Jim Epstein on How to Get More Americans Banking Without Involving the U.S. Postal Service
Would you trust the post office with your money?
By doing away with the need to wait in line and schedule visits around their limited hours, banks have become a lot less like U.S. post offices—and that's certainly a good thing. Yet some lawmarkers, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass), want the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to get back into the banking business. The USPS inspector general released a white paper last month arguing that the organization should use its enormous reach—31,272 retail branches—to help those "underserved" by traditional banks.
While reducing the number of unbanked Americans is a worthwhile goal, writes Jim Epstein, it could be more easily achieved if Sen. Warren and other Washington do-gooders would abandon their backward-looking schemes and simply get out of the way. He offers three policies that would better serve the banking needs of the underserved. And none of them have anything to do with your local letter carriers.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?