The latest issue of The Weekly Standard describes the Supreme Court's 2005 eminent domain ruling in Kelo v. City of New London as "a tragedy with all the classical Greek elements: hubris, turn of fortune, cathartic downfall, and possibly the 'learning through suffering' that Aristotle in his Poetics argued was the point of tragic drama." That is certainly a plausible interpretation of the case, argues Reason Senior Editor Damon Root. But unfortunately, Root adds, there's at least one major player in this tragedy who has yet to show any signs of learning his lesson from the suffering he caused. That person is Justice John Paul Stevens, whose majority opinion allowed the forced condemnations to proceed.
The proposed bill from Assembly Members Evan Low and Cristina Garcia would require stores to have one unisex section for children's products and apparel.
This misguided effort to combat "misinformation" is a brazen assault on free speech.
Democrats' COVID-19 Aid Package Would Quietly Eliminate the Tipped Minimum Wage as Restaurants Struggle To Stay Alive
Do small businesses need another punch in the gut?
Wondering what "95 percent efficacy" means? I've got some good news for you.
"My mom used to have to do the same thing when we were young."