Last week California health regulators ordered the makers of Sriracha hot sauce to suspend operations for 30 days. The 30-day hold comes despite the fact the product has been on the market for more than three decades and that "no recall has been ordered and no pathogenic bacteria have been found[.]" So what's the issue? The problem, reports the Pasadena Star News, is that Sriracha is a raw food. "Because Sriracha is not cooked, only mashed and blended, Huy Fong needs to make sure its bottles won't harbor dangerous bacteria," writes the Star News. As Baylen Linnekin asks, "aren't three decades of sales sufficient proof of that fact?
Thank you for supporting us during our webathon!
Reason is supported by:
A Professor Tried To End a Flirty Email Exchange With a Young Woman. Then She Threatened to Blackmail Him.
When the grad student threatened to publicize their embarrassing correspondence, he reported her. But the university decided he was the villain.
The Inspector General Report Is a Huge Blow to the FBI's Credibility. Why Is It Being Treated Like Vindication?
The government's surveillance of Carter Page might not have been improperly motivated, but it was still seriously flawed.
No, but that's not stopping a litigious vegan from making his case.
Teen activists are righteously angry—but righteous anger does not produce sound public policy.