Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Young People Still Don't Grasp Obamacare, Venezuela Goes Dark Again, State Department Loves Its Cocktails: P.M. Links

Scott Shackford | 12.3.2013 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | doyougotinsurance.com
(doyougotinsurance.com)
  • "Yeah, you just call that British lizard guy, right? He'll fix you right up."
    doyougotinsurance.com

    Those young people the Affordable Care Act needs in order to properly function have no idea what the heck it is. Guess those stupid frat boy ads aren't working.

  • An engineer of the train that derailed in New York, killing four, reportedly told investigators he was falling asleep as the train approached a curve at more than twice the posted speed.
  • Venezuela has had another massive power outage, which the president is blaming on sabotage and not the nation's economy collapsing or anything.
  • Intelligence reports suggest North Korea's Kim Jong Un has removed an uncle from a top military post and executed two close aides for "corruption."
  • The State Department spent around $400,000 last year on booze.
  • A well-known Egyptian blogger was arrested in the country's new crackdown against dissent and demonstrations.

Get Reason.com and Reason 24/7 content widgets for your websites.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Obama: Affordable Care Act Not Getting Repealed While I'm President

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (465)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    The State Department spent around $400,000 last year on booze.

    Bunch of filthy cosmoz!

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      My first thought was, "Only $400,000?"

      1. Rich   11 years ago

        The rest was for hookers and blow.

      2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        You're thinking about the black slush fund.

        1. Ted S.   11 years ago

          Always with the racist slush funds.

          1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

            No, in this case it's part of the double-secret budget that's secret because of national security. Which may include racism, but that's a secret.

            1. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

              Hush! Indicating what may or may not be secret is the mark of a traitor!

              1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                Better make it all secret, so there's no question about it.

                1. CatherineAdams563   11 years ago

                  Love my job, since I've been bringing in $82h? I sit at home, music playing while I work in front of my new iMac that I got now that I'm making it online?...WWW.JUMP85.COM

    2. Mike M.   11 years ago

      Being effete State Department types, $350,000 of it was probably for Chardonnay.

      1. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

        You misspelled white zinfandel.

      2. Root Boy   11 years ago

        You sure - wasn't Hillary! still running the place last year -- she's a foul mouthed scotch drinker from what I've seen, so at least $100K was for her office.

      3. hamilton   11 years ago

        Must've been hanging out at reason cocktail parties then.

    3. CE   11 years ago

      Can't have cocktail parties without cocktails.

      1. thom   11 years ago

        Seriously. Isn't part of the State Dept's job to throw cocktail parties/host official events/etc? If so, $400K seems reasonable, if not downright cheap.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Intelligence reports suggest North Korea's Kim Jong Un has removed an uncle from a top military post and executed two close aides for "corruption."

    So it's al Qaeda No. 2, president of Egypt and anyone in eyeshot of Kim. Jobs you don't want to have.

    1. The Last American Hero   11 years ago

      What the hell does the AQ org chart look like? Based solely on MSM news reports, I think there is a leader, 1,000 or so vice presidents, and everyone else is a "high ranking member".

      1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

        I have to imagine it's pretty flat, even where it hasn't been flattened.

    2. Boisfeuras   11 years ago

      anyone in eyeshot of Kim

      Fortunately, a very narrow criterion

      1. Rich   11 years ago

        RACIST!

        1. Entropy Void   11 years ago

          LACIST!

          FTFY.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Those young people the Affordable Care Act needs in order to properly function have no idea what the heck it is.

    Maybe lighter wallets will wisen them up.

    1. playa manhattan   11 years ago

      A lot of these young "activists" don't even file returns. They won't have any idea that their wallets are lighter.

    2. JWatts   11 years ago

      Maybe lighter wallets will wisen them up.

      A lot of them probably don't have much of a tax refund. If so, or if their smart enough to adjust their withholding, then they effectively pay no penalty.

      According to the current provisions, the IRS is only allowed to collect the penalty out of the refund check. So, if you ensure that you owe the IRS a little bit of extra money on April 15th, they've got no way of penaltaxing you.

      Well at least until Obama issues another Executive Order and unilaterally changes the law.

      1. nothinghead   11 years ago

        The IRS will assess a penalty for underwithholding after a couple of years of that.

        1. Bobarian   11 years ago

          There going to start adjusting withholding to about 50% and let you have some of it back at the end of the year... but not a whole lot of it.

  4. John   11 years ago

    hose young people the Affordable Care Act needs in order to properly function have no idea what the heck it is. Guess those stupid frat boy ads aren't working.

    For once the low information voter works against them.

    1. itsnotmeitsyou   11 years ago

      hose young people

      Legendary John typos.

      The real reason I keep coming back here.

    2. Root Boy   11 years ago

      hose them is right on.

      1. CE   11 years ago

        Where's x-box support girl?

    3. GILMORE   11 years ago

      ""To be honest, I never paid attention to what the hell was going on. My always voting Democrat was the result of that. My philosophy was and is all politicians are liars, bums and cheats."[8]"

      - Moe Tucker

      1. Michael S. Langston   11 years ago

        My always voting Democrat was the result of that. My philosophy was and is all politicians are liars, bums and cheats.

        Sorry Moe - but what you meant to say was:

        I've always said my philosophy is all politicians are liars, bums and cheats. But it's not... as if anyone has paid close attention to my actual votes, it's obvious I don't believe this idea because if I did, my vote would either be much more randomly distributed over various parties or nonexistent. Since admittedly I have only voted for one party ever, my actions prove my true philosophy is: all politicians are liars, bums and cheats, except for those on my side. But since this is an untenable position to hold while simultaneously believing myself a decent person, I choose instead to believe in a false reality where mutually exclusive actions can be magically transformed into very similar actions all neatly housed within a consistent political philosophy.

        Though mine is wordier...and in a world where intentions matter - I'm sure he means well....

  5. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Venezuela has had another massive power outage, which the president is blaming on sabotage and not the nation's economy collapsing or anything.

    How many Fifth Columns do they have in Caracas?

    1. entropy   11 years ago

      He blames everything on sabotage and not the nation's economy collapsing or anything.

      I'm pretty sure in Venezuela, the occurrence of Tuesday is all the Imperial Capitalist Amerikkkans fault.

      1. Root Boy   11 years ago

        Must be the reason, I keep hearing progs call Obama a moderate Republican these days - plus they can eventually blame his conservative tendencies for ruining Socialized Health Care.

        1. Libertarius   11 years ago

          Denial is a river in lefty lalaland.

          1. briny   11 years ago

            Lefty Lakeland (Los Angeles) doesn't have rivers, unless a concrete mulch counts.

            1. briny   11 years ago

              Teach me to rely on predictive typing!

              Lefty Lalaland doesn't have rivers unless a concrete gulch counts.

              Sheesh.

      2. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

        I'm pretty sure in Venezuela, the occurrence of Tuesday is all the Imperial Capitalist Amerikkkans fault.

        And they blame Mondays on Bob Geldof.

    2. Damned Fool   11 years ago

      Currently they're on the Twelfth Column.

    3. Medical Physics Guy   11 years ago

      True fact, my mother in law used to routinely include me in emails she forwarded two friends from "School of the Americas Watch" about what a great leader Chavez was and not to believe any of the slanderous American MSM when they suggested that he wasn't doing a visionary job.

      What was a Reasonoid to do??

      1. Medical Physics Guy   11 years ago

        *two - to

      2. The DerpRider   11 years ago

        Mail toilet paper to her.

        1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

          The idea that Venezuela is short of toilet paper is a lie promulgated by wreckers and kulaks. They have plenty.

      3. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

        Move your family to an undisclosed location and leave no forwarding address.

    4. mad libertarian guy   11 years ago

      So now Venezuelans have to wipe their asses with something NOT toilet paper and in the dark? That's fucking shitty.

    5. Entropy Void   11 years ago

      Cinco!

    6. CE   11 years ago

      In California we use the massive power outages to tell when it's over 98 degrees without looking at the thermometer.

  6. Caleb Turberville   11 years ago

    http://www.al.com/auburnfootba.....ncart_2box

    Cuzin' Tommy voted Auburn #3 in the Coaches' Poll. Geez, Auburn, what does it take to get the support of former HCs?

    1. Andrew S.   11 years ago

      Auburn has Pat Dye as a former HC. Every other former HC they have should shun them as a result.

    2. Ted S.   11 years ago

      Are you suggesting #3 is too high, or too low? I mean, FSU is ahead of them, and Alabama would probably win nine out of ten, with it being unfortunate that they lost the one that was actually played. But who else would be ahead of them? I suppose we'll see about Missouri on Saturday.

      1. Caleb Turberville   11 years ago

        Auburn can be unranked for all I care, but I would expect Tubs to lend a helping hand to Auburn. I mean, he even attended the Iron Bowl for crying out loud.

        1. wareagle   11 years ago

          Tubs is holding out for an AU win Saturday. His son is a walk-on, hence the attendance, but an SEC title might sway his vote depending on how the Big 10 game goes.

        2. Ted S.   11 years ago

          Seriously, I didn't know if you were thinking he would rank Auburn higher because he coached there, or lower because they fired him.

      2. Andrew S.   11 years ago

        #3 is fine with me for them, with Ohio State at 2 and FSU at 1. But I count the Georgia game as half a loss, because it was a luckier victory than the game against Bama.

        1. CE   11 years ago

          Not sure why Florida State is the unanimous number one when Ohio State has a better coach and plays in a better conference and has a longer winning streak.

          1. Sudden   11 years ago

            I wouldn't call the big 10 a better conference than the ACC

          2. Sudden   11 years ago

            I wouldn't call the big 10 a better conference than the ACC

    3. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

      An undefeated season. Just like any other team.

    4. wareagle   11 years ago

      you would think the buyout would do it. I get the logic; unbeaten trumps once beaten. And AU needs to worry about this Saturday before thinking bigger, tough the season is already bigger than even the biggest optimist imagined.

    5. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

      Hope Mich St., Duke, and Missouri all win just for all the chaos and butthurt it will cause. A perfect send off for the BCS.

      1. Caleb Turberville   11 years ago

        Don't forget #5 Oklahoma State. They play #17 Oklahoma next week.

        May the BCS crash and burn.

        1. Caleb Turberville   11 years ago

          I honestly believe that any nightmare scenario this weekend will lead to BCS computer self-awareness.

          It might be a good idea to avoid pulling the plug. Any attempt at systems shutdown might be interpreted as a threat.

          1. CE   11 years ago

            If the BCS computers become self-aware, they're going to be pissed that they weren't allowed to consider margin of victory in computing the rankings, just to keep Boise State, Oregon and Baylor down.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    An engineer of the train that derailed in New York, killing four, reportedly told investigators he was falling asleep as the train approached a curve at more than twice the posted speed.

    With GPS and whatnot, wouldn't it be easy to put a governor or alarm at least when approaching low speed curves? Wait, are those engineers union?

    1. Mike M.   11 years ago

      They're going off the rails on the crazy train.

      1. Killaz   11 years ago

        S.A.T.O, best Ozzy, Randy collaboration. The layering of riff and effect nuances is lush like Nikki on Bartles and James.

        1. Nikki just says no   11 years ago

          I will take this as a compliment, Killaz.

          1. Killaz   11 years ago

            Without the backhand, my forward serve would be weak and ineffective.

            1. Killaz   11 years ago

              That sounded good to my ears, but I have no idea what it meant.

    2. Rasilio   11 years ago

      The hell with GPS you could achieve the same result with spray painted lines on the track, small transmitters placed along the trackside, and a hundred other technologies.

      Honestly outside of Government Employee Unions I can think of no legitimate reason why commuter trains require engineers.

      We've had the technology to completely automate the trains with error rates far below human error for at least 20 years now

      1. Rich   11 years ago

        But there's something about a train driver ....

        1. CE   11 years ago

          Yeah, an automated train would have to pass the Turing Test in order to text their girlfriend when they should be braking.

      2. playa manhattan   11 years ago

        That same union is telling the driver not to answer questions anymore.

        1. Ted S.   11 years ago

          To be fair, that's the same thing we'd be saying to a non-union train driver being asked questions by the authorities.

      3. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

        SPRAY PAINTED LINES TOOK OUR JOBS!

      4. Zeb   11 years ago

        It still seems like a good idea to have someone on board just in case, but there really is no reason they shouldn't be fully automated.

        1. Rasilio   11 years ago

          20 years ago you'd have been right.

          Today it would be so ridiculously cheap to install multiple overlapping layers of security.

          Onboard computer/sensor system that uses 2 different sets of sensors to know the trains wherabouts on the track at all times. GPS back up of those. finally realtime wireless monitoring of all onboard systems from a remote facility.

          If any 2 of those 4 control systems fails the train begins broadcasting a distress signal to any trains behind it so they know not to rear end it then drops down to a minimal safe speed until it arrives at the next station.

          A human onboard would be utterly redundant

          1. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

            The whole point of a human on board is to have a low-level plebe to blame/prosecute should something go wrong.

            1. JWatts   11 years ago

              The whole point of a human on board is to have a low-level plebe to blame/prosecute should something go wrong.

              And to be a fail safe for the unexpected. But sections of railroads with a curve should not be unexpected.

              1. CE   11 years ago

                Or better yet, have Capt Kirk and that drunk pilot from Flight ready on standby in a pickup truck.

                1. Bobarian   11 years ago

                  But only after Randy lets the train go on its own.

      5. JWatts   11 years ago

        The rail road companies were required by union rules to employ a brake engineer on their trains for decades after they got rid of the caboose. For the most part, the only way they went away was retiring.

      6. Libertarius   11 years ago

        You might not be an actual moron, but you sure as hell sound like one when you talk about running unmanned trains lol

        I know you guys don't know shit about trains or the mechanics of railroading, but I'm a conductor on a Class 1 so I'll set you straight: there is no way in hell that you could run unmanned freight trains, and the possibility of unmanned passenger trains is only less improbable.

        There are too many tasks that have to be performed by a human being, and no way in hell would I ever get on an unmanned passenger train. There is too much shit that can go wrong that a computer would have no way to know about.

        1. Metazoan   11 years ago

          There is too much shit that can go wrong that a computer would have no way to know about.

          Like...? I'm seriously asking out of curiosity.

          1. Libertarius   11 years ago

            Freight trains are often built between destinations; for instance, we'll have to stop at a remote grain elevator with cars parked on an industrial siding, so I have to inspect the track, throw the switches, guide the engineer back into the siding via radio, ensure the cars knuckle-up, attach the brake lines, then conduct a brake test.

            And if a knuckle breaks while the train is underway (which happens all the time), the conductor has to install the new knuckle, knuckle-up, attach the lines, conduct a brake test. Even if a computer system could properly inform itself that a knuckle had busted and stop the train, it would have to sit there for hours until someone arrived to fix it.

            A railroad is not a video game, it is a brutal environment where sensitive electronic equipment gets the shit beat out of it. I've been through these scenarios in my head a million times, and I'm convinced the two-man crew is the best practicable way to run freight trains.

            1. Rasilio   11 years ago

              Ok, you are not talking about DRIVING the train, you are talking about bringing repair crews on long haul inter city routes.

              Thing is no one is talking about freight, or even amtrack trains. We're talking about subway and intra city commuter rail lines.

              Those are not constructed under way, they are put together in depots and no point along the rail line is more than 50 miles from the central hub.

              Oh for reference, the light rail system in Charlotte NC runs completely unattended, no engineer, no driver, not even conductors, fares are collected on the "honor system" with transit cops inspecting tickets every so often to keep people generally honest.

            2. briny   11 years ago

              Funny, but a robot has been doing that job in the railyard for fifteen years here (Fresno, Ca.). I watch all the time from my front yard. Definitely more reliable than people. Just for reference, I am more than capable of designing and building such from scratch. Nuclear powered even. Been living around tailgates and shipyards all my life.

        2. CE   11 years ago

          Seems like a train would be easier to automate than a car, and they're doing that.

        3. Timon 19   11 years ago

          Oh really?

        4. jb4479   11 years ago

          So I'm guessing you never plan to leave the US? They have trains in Europe that are unmanned and some of the bullet trains in Asia only have a human in case of an oh shit. By the way the Valley Transit trains in Silicon Valley might as well be unmanned. The person is only there if something goes wrong.

        5. Rasilio   11 years ago

          Hmm, trains go in a straight line on a predetermined course with rails to keep them from deviating.

          They have autonomous airplanes which travel in an unbound 3 dimensional space.

          They have autonomous cars capable of traveling in an unbound 2 dimensional space with an infinitely more chaotic environment of moving obsticles

          If both of those things are possible you are the one that sounds like an idiot.

          Yes it is true the trains YOU drive might not be able to be retrofitted to run unmanned (I doubt it but it is possible) this in no way shape or form impacts the ability to run trains in general autonomously

    3. JW   11 years ago

      His last name wouldn't be Jones, would it?

      1. Karl Hungus   11 years ago

        And if it was, maybe he should have had a little bump of cocaine when he went on duty.

        1. PD Scott   11 years ago

          More lives lost because of drug testing.

    4. mad libertarian guy   11 years ago

      With GPS and whatnot, wouldn't it be easy to put a governor or alarm at least when approaching low speed curves?

      With GPS, they can omit engineers at all and run the entire fucking train with a computer.

      Wait, are those engineers union?

      You bet your as they are.This guy will be sacrificed, but ultimately it will be used to get MORE engineers on the train with less hours resulting in a higher price.

      Falling asleep? Take some fucking no doz or drink some goddamn coffee.

    5. Agammamon   11 years ago

      ". . .Wait, are those engineers union?"

      So unionized that its illegal for management to refuse the demands of the unions.

      This is an organization that only got rid of the requirement for Firemen on *diesel* trains 4 or 5 years ago.

      1. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

        4 or 5 years ago? More like thirty years ago or more (depending on state regulations) when cabooses were mostly eliminated and railroads went from 5 man crews down to 2.

        1. Agammamon   11 years ago

          In 1985 a presidential board decided that firemen were no longer necessary for the safe operation of diesel engines - 25 years after the change-over from steam - but it wasn't until 5ish years ago that the unions agreed to no longer require special pay for engineers operating diesels without a fireman onboard.

          Though I may be wrong on the date - it could be closer to 8ish years.

          1. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

            Railroad pay practices are completely byzantine. There are lots of leftover extras and special circumstances rules and both sides think it benefits them.

    6. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

      Railroads are supposed to be implement Positive Train Control by 2015 but they're unlikely to make it. The latest delay is that all trackside antenna installations (something like 20,000 or so left) have to be inspected and approved by both the FCC and Indian tribes under the National Historic Preservation Act. See http://cs.trains.com/trn/b/fre.....wreck.aspx

  8. Damned Fool   11 years ago

    The State Department spent around $400,000 last year on booze.

    You'd need it to work there.

    1. PD Scott   11 years ago

      Foggy bottom, foggy head, foggy memory...

    2. CE   11 years ago

      What difference, at this point, does it make?

  9. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    The State Department spent around $400,000 last year on booze.

    Good to know writing checks isn't the only thing in their bag of tricks.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Venezuela has had another massive power outage, which the president is blaming on sabotage and not the nation's economy collapsing or anything.

    Socialism is a type of sabotage.

  11. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Kenyan man gets 10 years for sexually abusing a goat

    Katana Kitsao Gona, 28, last week admitted sexually abusing the animal in the Kenyan town of Malindi.

    The female goat watched quietly in the corner of the court room as her attacker was jailed for bestiality.

    He was caught when a local resident found him naked in a field having sex with the grazing goat, who was tied up, according to The Star.

    The goat's owner was alerted and arrived at the scene with other residents who also witnessed Gona having sex with the animal.

    He was arrested by police and a medical examination confirmed sexual abuse had taken place.

    Gona told the court his wife is disabled and depends on him but was nevertheless jailed for ten years.

    10 years seems excessive.

    1. Mike M.   11 years ago

      Probably Obama's third cousin or something.

      1. Damned Fool   11 years ago

        The goat? It speaks about as sensibly.

        1. Ted S.   11 years ago

          That's only because it's reading a teleprompter.

    2. Rich   11 years ago

      The female goat watched quietly in the corner of the court room as her attacker was jailed for bestiality.

      Now, *that* is journalism.

      1. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

        How did they know it was a goat and not Stevie Nicks?

    3. Killaz   11 years ago

      Fucking a goat was the initiation ritual for being a member of the Kenyan nationalist rebellion back in the 1950s. Didn't realize the practice had become frowned upon in the years since. Progress?

      1. playa manhattan   11 years ago

        I've been away for awhile. Sup' with the new handle?

        1. Killaz   11 years ago

          No longer running, no longer dodging the law, and taking my stand. Fucking ATF wont be taking this cat alive.

      2. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

        Goats need love too, Killaz. Where's HM with that chicken fucking video?

        Vice on Columbian Donkey Fucking

        1. Killaz   11 years ago

          I kinda don't view sex with animal videos.

          1. Ted S.   11 years ago

            Human beings are animals, at least in Linnaean taxonomy.

            1. Killaz   11 years ago

              I'm a cyborg with the barest of my original gray matter left undigitized. I view videos of your species nude and rutting against one another with the utmost disgust. Now give me a Tesla going up on top of a Honda Civic and making it screech like a VW bug, and we're talking.

              1. Agammamon   11 years ago

                Squeal, squeal like a loose fan belt!

        2. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

          Nope. Not enough alcohol in me to warrant clicking that.

    4. JWatts   11 years ago

      10 years seems excessive.

      Misogynist!

      1. Agammamon   11 years ago

        Rape culture.

  12. Caleb Turberville   11 years ago

    http://blog.al.com/wire/2013/1.....cart_river

    Animal rights groups want Chimps to be declared legal persons.

    1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      The chain of consequences that go with that are quite profound. I suspect they would like to find a way to give animals the vote, then claim to speak solely for those animals.

      1. Caleb Turberville   11 years ago

        This really does open the doors for fetal rights.

        1. Tonio   11 years ago

          Yes, but not necessarily in the way that will make everyone happy. It won't be based on what DNA an organism has, but the neural complexity of the organism (actual, not theoretical or potential).

        2. Agammamon   11 years ago

          Not really - the attempt is going to fail because corporations, unlike animals, can be (and are) a nexus for contracts.

          Animals can't be.

      2. Tonio   11 years ago

        I suspect they would like to find a way to give animals the vote, then claim to speak solely for those animals.

        Well, PL, suspect all you want, but this is the same level as people who "know" that all libertarians are racist, etc.

        What about the simpler hypothesis that these people, or the vast majority of them, simply want to protect our closest living relatives?

        1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

          protect our closest living relatives

          Why would space reptilians need our protection?

          ...I mean, chimps yes! Evolution on this planet...Indeed.

          1. Tonio   11 years ago

            You're not helping.

            1. JW   11 years ago

              Don't look for it, Tonio. You may not like what you find.

              1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                Could you imagine what would happen if Dr. Zaius had the right to vote?

                1. JW   11 years ago

                  Wasn't he the Secretary of Labor, a few years back?

                  1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                    You're thinking of that monkey, Robert Reich, not the majestic orangutan that is Zaius.

                    1. JW   11 years ago

                      Don't be so easily fooled, ProL. That was just his man name.

                  2. Bobarian   11 years ago

                    Secretary of State under the Clinton Admin?

                2. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

                  I'm guessing there are already plenty of chimps, cats, dogs, parakeets and other non-humans registered to vote in those states that are desperately trying to prevent "Voter ID" laws.

                  1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                    That would explain a few things, as even elderly precinct volunteers would likely note that the chimp who just walked in didn't look anything like his driver's license photo.

                  2. Entropy Void   11 years ago

                    That would be "Chicago."

            2. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

              I do my part; I don't eat octopus because I fear they will eventually take over. They evolved greater intelligence than dogs and HAVE NO BONES. Tool use, learning how to walk on land...it can only mean we will soon kneel on our paltry two knees to our octopodean overlords.

              1. Entropy Void   11 years ago

                Jesse-

                You kneel before your god, I will kneel before mine.

                /no homophobe

          2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

            It's like Tonio never saw The Planet of the Apes. The good one. From the 60s.

          3. The DerpRider   11 years ago

            A planet where apes evolved from MAN!

        2. SIV   11 years ago

          What, are you some sort of Apeman?

        3. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          Dude, seriously? I'm all for protecting chimps. Giving them the fucking vote and the right to serve on juries might be a bit excessive.

          1. JW   11 years ago

            Giving them the fucking vote and the right to serve on juries might be a bit excessive.

            That actually sounds like an improvement over the current situation.

            1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

              Yes, well, you got me there.

              This reminds me of the bit in Scrooged when Robert Mitchum wanted Bill Murray to include more things that appealed to dogs and cats in his programming.

              1. JW   11 years ago

                And we've been paying for it since, with reality shows.

                1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                  Wow, I always thought that was a joke. It explains so much.

      3. JWatts   11 years ago

        I suspect they would like to find a way to give animals the vote, then claim to speak solely for those animals.

        My wife worked as a therapist in a state mental facility a few years ago. The staff would take the patients to vote (their legal right) and literally tell the patients that Obama would take care of them, but McCain was going to take away their stuff.

        1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          Ah, integrity at work.

    2. Rich   11 years ago

      What?! Then before long we will have minkeys with *bimbs*!

      1. Agammamon   11 years ago

        Minkey? You said 'minkey"!

    3. Sevo   11 years ago

      When chimps kill another animal, will they then be charged with murder? Who will represent them? Can they participate in their won defense?

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Well, if they're legal persons, they can't be discriminated against on the basis of their species, I'm sure. Also, just because they lack the mental capacity and the speech skills to conduct a defense, I assume some sort of ADA thing would kick in, requiring a reasonable accommodation for their disabilities.

        Also, because of their disabilities, they qualify for all sorts of welfare.

        Finally, can you imagine the class action suits all of these animals could generate?

      2. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

        I once had someone tell me that chimps only become violent after coming in to contact with people. So there's your answer.

        1. waffles   11 years ago

          That person was an idiot. Chimps are capable of ostracizing and murdering other chimps. They exhibit the same tribalism of any ape.

          1. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

            Idiot doesn't even begin to describe her. Somehow the conversation started with why scientists were interested in Europa as a possible site of extra-terrestrial life. She seemed to think it was because it was named Europa, and it revealed a Euro-centric Western bias (despite an obvious background in humanities she didn't seem to be well versed in Greek mythology). At least I think that was her line of "thought". It was hard to tell. From there the conversation spiraled into other forms of supposed exploitation. It was...interesting.

            1. waffles   11 years ago

              My condolences. I'm fairly certain that is an incurable condition.

              1. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

                She home schooled. An example where state-run education is a better choice for the kids.

            2. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

              She seemed to think it was because it was named Europa, and it revealed a Euro-centric Western bias

              Oh, my. At least the poor sop's mind got me to laugh out loud.

            3. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

              Let's hope that this person had the good decency to sleep with you for making you listen to that hogswishle.

              1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                It's an oral imperative.

          2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

            She could be confusing bonobos with chimps, which is a common mistake. Not that bonobos got violent either before or after human contact.

            It's interesting that the anti-human elements don't seem to get that many of our inherent traits are shared by our ape relatives.

            1. Michael S. Langston   11 years ago

              It's more likely part of the stupid myth that only human is the only animal who kills for fun or goes to war and kills for things other than strict survival/food.

              But of course it's BS - big cats kill young cats in other species all the time simply to remove competitors - wolves are just destructive and will kill weak things when they don't need to - also for territorial reasons will kill for "war" type behavior.

              Whales seem to "play" with dolphins and other animals too while "hunting only for food"... and I'm sure there are tons of other examples.

              The base myth is somehow humans killing others is vastly different and therefore evil by definition, than other animals killing animals.

              A tangential myth is somehow all non-human animal behavior is "natural" whereas human entry into any ecosystem is considered damaging by default.

              & the myths work well with the religion that is the left - as facts aren't required to prove the evil nature of man as all religions require original sin, with the left is human's self-interested nature that is the sin - therefore anything resulting from human is automatically evil (consumerism, capitalism, etc, etc).

        2. Sevo   11 years ago

          LynchPin1477|12.3.13 @ 4:53PM|#
          "I once had someone tell me that chimps only become violent after coming in to contact with people."

          I'll bet that someone had all sorts of stories.

        3. Isaac Bartram   11 years ago

          I once had someone tell me that chimps only become violent after coming in to contact with people.

          So it's all Jane Goodall's fault, then?

          I knew it.

      3. Tonio   11 years ago

        When chimps kill another animal...

        That again? You people go apeshit any time anyone talks about acknowledging that someone else has rights.

        1. Cytotoxic   11 years ago

          Only people have rights. Chimps are sub-humnan.

          1. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

            So if we encountered a race of intelligent aliens, they'd be ripe for pillaging?

            1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

              Or vice versa.

              1. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

                Good point.

                1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

                  I wonder if there's some sort of galactic test you have to take to determine whether you are a pillager or a pillagee.

                  1. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

                    The FYTW test.

                    1. JWatts   11 years ago

                      The FYTW test.

                      I'm pretty sure that covers it.

            2. Corning   11 years ago

              So if we encountered a race of intelligent aliens, they'd be ripe for pillaging?

              Yes.

          2. SIV   11 years ago

            Thank you

          3. Tonio   11 years ago

            So, Cyto: Magical Human DNA(tm), inalienable rights granted by Our Creator, or what?

            1. Swiss Servator, referendiffic!   11 years ago

              Humph, next thing you'll be wanting to give Warty human rights!

              1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

                That's ridiculous! One doesn't give Warty anything. If Warty wants something he rapes you into a jelly and takes what he wants.

      4. Entropy Void   11 years ago

        Ask Bo, I'm sure he has represented a few simians before ...

    4. Killaz   11 years ago

      Sure, as long as every sponsor on a chimp human is willing to be the legal guardian with all the legal repercussions that entails when his little person flings shit at or bites someone's face off.

    5. Rich   11 years ago

      Mandatory.

      1. SIV   11 years ago

        I was "de-freinded" on FB a few years ago for mocking a "friend" who said that was racist.

    6. SIV   11 years ago

      Then we'd have to jail all the chimps for their many, many heinous crimes.

      1. Killaz   11 years ago

        The funny thing about it, give them human rights, and you just know they will vote Republican. They're dicks that way.

      2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        They'd be suing the pants off of us, though, for all sorts of things. Through their human counsel, of course.

        Personally, I intend to represent Homo sapiens neanderthalensis in a class action against Homo sapiens sapiens for a variety of wrongs.

        1. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

          They'd be suing the pants off of us

          Well, that goes without saying. If there's one thing we have over the apes, it's that we have pants and they don't.

          1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

            Yep, discrimination right there.

          2. edcoast   11 years ago

            Speaking of which (whom?), where has TE/PF been lately? Or did he change his name to something and I missed it?

        2. Entropy Void   11 years ago

          But can I throw poo and semen at Nancy Pelosi, that's ALL I want to know ...

    7. Jordan   11 years ago

      Then they'd be subject to Obamacare. Talk about animal person cruelty.

    8. CatoTheElder   11 years ago

      Oh great! Another Democrat Party constituency.

    9. briny   11 years ago

      Obligatory RAH ref. 'Jerry Was A Man'

  13. Entropy Void   11 years ago

    The Anti-Nannies win one:

    http://dailycaller.com/2013/12.....hydrants/#!

    1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      What's an anti-nanny? Mr. Banks?

      1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

        Mary Poppins' ex-husband.

        1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          Wait, what? I thought she was strictly banging Bert.

      2. Entropy Void   11 years ago

        Ninny!

    2. JWatts   11 years ago

      "No one is getting a steady supply of drinking water from the fire hydrant at the end of their street, so we should not add to the heavy burden our local governments with constrained budgets already experience," said Rep. Paul Tonko, a New York Democrat.

      What do you think the results would have been if the EPA had restricted their regulation to private fire hydrants?

  14. Rich   11 years ago

    Across all age groups, however, a vast majority of Americans are at least somewhat familiar with the law, with 72 percent of all respondents indicating some level of familiarity.

    This is bullshit. Saying you are familiar does not mean you have any idea what that monstrosity really contains.

    1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

      "Would you say that you are 'somewhat' familiar with the Affordable Care Act?"

      "Uh, yeah, sure."

      1. Michael S. Langston   11 years ago

        & worse, with such vaguely worded questions - those people who may follow politics, but haven't paid too close attention to the particulars wrt to O-care, might say the aren't that familiar when what they know is more detailed than a majority of people stating they are familiar with it.

        I assume a WH poll?

  15. waffles   11 years ago

    The fair value of bitcoin is zero

    With bitcoin above 1000 USD and staying there (for the time being) there is a lot of hand wringing over whether this is 21st century tulipmania or a new paradigm of currency. I remain an interested (uninvested) observer.

    1. John   11 years ago

      The fair value of anything is what someone is willing to pay for it

      1. waffles   11 years ago

        It seems like the author goes through contorted definitions of a "monetary instrument" to avoid such simplicity. In this definition is seems like you would find the fair market value of a dollar is zero.

        1. Ted S.   11 years ago

          The Fed is doing its best to make the fair market value of a dollar be zero.

        2. Nikki just says no   11 years ago

          Right? I was kind of confused about that.

        3. JWatts   11 years ago

          Meh, the likely market value is greater than zero, but probably a lot less than the current $1,000.

        4. CE   11 years ago

          A dollar has value because you can use it to pay your taxes. If the US FedGov goes away, the value would drop to that of colored paper.

          1. Gozer the Gozerian   11 years ago

            The dollar also has value because it is a widely accepted medium of exchange: Money has network properties, incumbency effects, etc.

            The legal constraints on the production of Federal Reserve notes and reserves are an essential component of that, so there would indeed be a problem if FedGov? were to go by the wayside. However, that is not really germane to the larger point.

      2. Swiss Servator, referendiffic!   11 years ago

        "the value of a thing, is what that thing will bring".

    2. R C Dean   11 years ago

      The bitcoin has every bit as much backing as any other fiat currency. Its hard to slag on it as being nothing but a bunch of ones and zeros backed by nothing, when the same is true of damn near every other currency on the planet.

  16. Ted S.   11 years ago

    For the fans of death metal:

    Communist-era pop music. This time from Bulgaria in 1984.

    As far as I know it's safe for work, but I don't speak Bulgarian.

  17. Enough About Palin   11 years ago

    The State Department spent around $400,000 last year on booze.

    And that's just what they spend on booze for their hookers.

  18. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Guess Who Wrote This:

    Amazon announced last summer it would add 5,000 new jobs to the 20,000 it already has. But not even 25,000 Amazon jobs come near to replacing the hundreds of thousands of retail jobs Amazon has already wiped out, and the hundreds of thousands more it will eliminate in the future.

    To put this in some perspective you need to know that retail jobs have been the fastest growing of all job categories since the recession ended in 2009. But given the rapid growth of online retailing, that trend can't possibly last. What will Americans do when online sales take over?

    Add to this the fact that most of what's being sold this holiday season is no longer made by Americans. Vast shipping containers of gadgets, garments, and other goodies are fabricated or assembled or sewed together in Asia for the American market.

    Online retailers are facilitating this move by having these goods shipped directly from Asian factories to distribution centers in America and then to our homes, without ever having to go to an American retail store or even a wholesaler. This means even lower prices and better deals. But it also means fewer jobs and lower pay for many Americans.
    [...]
    Get it? Technology and globalization are driving the good deals American consumers are getting this holiday season. But the same forces are keeping wages down, and are even on the verge of eliminating many of the low-wage retail and related service jobs many Americans now need to make ends meet.

    1. Enough About Palin   11 years ago

      What will Americans do when online sales take over?

      Buy shit online?

      1. Medical Physics Guy   11 years ago

        What will Americans do when online sales take over?

        I for one welcome our new online shopping overl.... oh wait that's me.

      2. Agammamon   11 years ago

        And save money.

        Imagine - we *still* get all the shit we could get when those people were employed selling and moving little boxes around the country *and* we have hundreds of thousands of people who can go out and do other things to further increase the wealth of the country.

        1. briny   11 years ago

          Check the thread about the need for more apprenticeship training.

    2. Andrew S.   11 years ago

      My standard guess is Sadbeard. I'll go with that.

    3. Sevo   11 years ago

      "But it also means fewer jobs and lower pay for many Americans."

      Yep, when buggy whips are no longer required, why whip-makers will starve!

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        No they won't. We plutocrats need something to whip our monocle-polishing child labor with!

        1. Rich   11 years ago

          What are tasers, chopped liver?

          1. Bobarian   11 years ago

            Tasers are made in Korea, buggy whips are good ole 'merican know-how!

      2. JW   11 years ago

        The streets are still littered with the starved bodies of coachman, unable to find work now that the infernal horseless carriage has taken over the streets.

    4. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

      Comparative advantage, how does it fucking work?

      1. Sevo   11 years ago

        Very well, now that you ask.

    5. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

      Do you want to live in a world where everyone has cars, or a world where blacksmiths can still make horseshoes? Choose wisely!

    6. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

      Sorry, the correct answer is Robert Reich.

      1. JW   11 years ago

        Ah, the candle salesman.

        1. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

          History's greatest example of "little man syndrome".

          1. Bobarian   11 years ago

            Does he get to take over from Napolean?

      2. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

        Such an ignorant little shit, peddling his twaddle to the legions of NPR listeners who dream of Kenny G concerts.

      3. Michael   11 years ago

        Jeezuz Christ on a cracker...


        figus_mockum
        95 Fans
        So technology will be the death of us all. What will the rest of the world do when Americans can't afford all the new technology? Some South American countries are on the up swing (sort of) but that won't last long. We live too fast and too long. Maybe technology will take care of that. We sure can't depend on the 1% to buy much stuff that is mass marketed. Just another step to serfdom.
        3 Dec 3:38 PM

        1. mad libertarian guy   11 years ago

          We sure can't depend on the 1%

          Anyone who stills refers to rich people as the 1% can safely be ignored forever.

      4. MJGreen   11 years ago

        And this guy was supposed to have taught economics, right?

        I ran into some poor fellow that was proud of the fact that he got to learn about the American economy from Reich.

        1. Entropy Void   11 years ago

          Kill him.

        2. Bobarian   11 years ago

          Did you order fries with your burger?

    7. PapayaSF   11 years ago

      Countless thousands of people now make a living (or part of one) selling used books on Amazon and everything on eBay, Craigslist, etc.

      1. Seamus   11 years ago

        I don't know about eBay, etc., but when I try to sell some of my used books on Amazon, I usually find that, unless I'm selling a first edition Leaves of Grass, the book I want to unload is already being sold at a price that would barely cover the cost of a Jiffy bag and postage. And those times when the competition is thin enough that I can offer my book at price that will make it worth my time, a few days later, I find that bots have undercut my price to the point where it's no longer worth trying to beat them. I usually end up carrying my books to my local public library and donating them to the annual Friends of the Library sale.

        1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

          I depends on the books. Many are sold at 1 cent plus $3.99 shipping, and apparently it's worth it for many people to sell that way. But I give some books to a friend with an established store there, and she's sold lots of them for $25-$500 over the years. I don't think she supports herself selling her books and eBay items, but I think it's a healthy supplement to the household income.

    8. JWatts   11 years ago

      Guess Who Wrote This?

      It doesn't have enough big words to be Krugman.

    9. CE   11 years ago

      Efficiency, how does it work?

  19. Caleb Turberville   11 years ago

    http://m.timesdaily.com/news/l.....l?mode=jqm

    Florence, Alabama may pass a resolution to allow alcoholic beverages during "special events," provided sellers buy a $250 license and the city is allowed to confiscate 5% of sales.

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      As if you want to liquor up a crowd that's half-and-half Alabama and Auburn supporters.

      1. JWatts   11 years ago

        As if the lack of a license is going to stop liquor consumption.

  20. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Those young people the Affordable Care Act needs in order to properly function have no idea what the heck it is.

    Why should they be any different than the rest of us?

    1. Rich   11 years ago

      I would pay (more) money to see a random selection of congresscreatures who voted for Democratcare questioned about its content on live primetime TV.

  21. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Captain Jean-Luc Picard and the Starship Enterprise crew sings "Let it Snow"

    Don't worry, there's some Wesley in there too!

    1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

      The internet found its purpose.

  22. John   11 years ago

    Just a reminder of what a murderous little retard Sad Beard is.

    Follow

    Matt YglesiasVerified account
    ?@mattyglesias
    @michaelbd No, pretty easy for me. I take an old-school Jacobin-style line that religion should be stamped out.

    1. Damned Fool   11 years ago

      You usually need charisma to start religious cleansing. The world is probably safe from Sadbeard Yglesias.

    2. Nikki just says no   11 years ago

      Aw, John, that's an old one! I was hoping for new SadBeard material.

      1. John   11 years ago

        I don't follow the little retard. It was linked by someone else and I hadn't seen it. I can't figure out if he is just that murderous or so stupid he has no idea that the Jacobeans murdered priests and religious people by the thousands.

        1. Mike M.   11 years ago

          That may be the most completely honest thing I've ever heard a so-called "progressive" say. Because at heart, Jacobins is exactly what they are.

        2. wareagle   11 years ago

          can't be both?

        3. JWatts   11 years ago

          Nah, he's not that stupid. He just got caught up in a public show of honesty.

    3. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

      Meh.

      I can't say much as I take an old-school Jacobin-style line that the pseudo-intellectual ivy leaguers in media and government should be stamped out. I know who I'd start with.

      1. John   11 years ago

        Oh I have a few ideas for who that would be. Decisions decisions.

        1. tarran   11 years ago

          Do you have a little list? 😉

  23. Sevo   11 years ago

    "An engineer of the train that derailed in New York, killing four, reportedly told investigators he was falling asleep as the train approached a curve at more than twice the posted speed."

    The next union contract will call for increased 'staying awake' pay!

    1. Enough About Palin   11 years ago

      No, two engineers.

      1. Rich   11 years ago

        "The engineers of the train that derailed in New York, killing four, reportedly told investigators they were having sex as the train approached a curve at more than twice the posted speed."

      2. PD Scott   11 years ago

        And a backseat engineer to nag them.

    2. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

      The next union contract will call for increased 'staying awake' pay!

      I actually had to testify one time as an expert witness in a case where an emergency room doc who worked overnights had worked out a deal with the other doc on duty. They were both on 12-hour shifts, and each would work six hours and sleep the other six, covering for each other. They had created this arrangement after getting a second doc on the shift, after insisting the nights were too busy for one doc to work alone.

      I was brought in solely to say that at other ERs, docs weren't paid for sleeping. But his attorney in cross-examination kept harassing me and bringing up studies that showed that sleep was important in work, and why did I want to deny doctors the sleep they needed to do their best? I pretty much responded with "why aren't they sleeping during the 12 hours they have off" and "I don't know of too many jobs where you get paid solely for sleeping" but it was a pretty unpleasant experience on the witness stand.

      1. CE   11 years ago

        Was the other lawyer taking a nap?

      2. NotAnotherSkippy   11 years ago

        Short answers. Volunteer nothing. No matter what you say it will be twisted. Yes, lawyers a truly a different (sub)species.

  24. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Add to this the fact that most of what's being sold this holiday season is no longer made by Americans. Vast shipping containers of gadgets, garments, and other goodies are fabricated or assembled or sewed together in Asia for the American market.

    Oh, horror.

    1. Medical Physics Guy   11 years ago

      Is this Henry Hazlitt writing a parody of his opponents?

    2. Red Rocks Rockin   11 years ago

      The irony is that Reich's partner in progtard mendacity, Krugnuts, has excoriated the Germans for doing exactly what Reich wants us to do.

  25. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Pentagon tracking Santa Claus adds new twist: an armed jet escort

    As Santa streaks through the sky this Christmas Eve, Rudolph merrily guiding the way, he will be flanked by some new and unusual companions: a jet-fighter escort, bristling with missiles.

    That is the twist that ? to the dismay of at least some child advocates ? the US military has chosen to put on this year's version of its traditional animated tracking of the yuletide journey.

    The popular program, without the jet escort, reached 22 million people last year and generated tens of thousands of phone calls from kids and their parents around the country. The mock mission allows families, either by calling or logging on, to get "real-time" updates on Old St. Nick's global trip to bring holiday cheer to girls and boys.

    This year's updated segment, now previewing on the military's website, depicts Santa soaring over snow-capped peaks with military aircraft keeping pace on either side.

    Adding the jets is "part of our effort to give the program more of an operational feel," said Navy Captain Jeff A. Davis, a spokesman for the command that sponsors the event, the North American Aerospace Defense Command, also known as NORAD.

    Needs more drones.

    1. Damned Fool   11 years ago

      Santa brings presents for the Western children and Hellfire missiles for the brown ones.

    2. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

      I guess we know which side NORAD is on in the War on Christmas.

    3. Boisfeuras   11 years ago

      "I think people are quite aware of the military's true mission," said Amy Hagopian, a professor of public health at the University of Washington, who has written extensively about military recruiting of youngsters. "If the military wants to keep its ranks stocked, it needs to appeal to children. The military knows it can't appeal to adults to volunteer. It is like the ad industry.''

      Typical leftist dipshit simply dismisses the existence of that which they can't understand. And yet the average age of enlistment for Army recruits was over 20 every year from 2001 to 2012. In FY11 and FY12, every service exceeded its retention rate goals?i.e. adults volunteering for an additional term of service?except the USAF in one cohort which achieved 95.5% of its goal.

      1. PD Scott   11 years ago

        You forget, in Obamamerica everyone under 26 is a child.

        1. CE   11 years ago

          But kegstands are okay.

      2. Rhywun   11 years ago

        it needs to appeal to children

        You'd think they'd be handing out candy-flavored Camels, then.

  26. John   11 years ago

    http://althouse.blogspot.com/2.....world.html

    Althouse notices Ezra Klein is a moron.

    1. Ted S.   11 years ago

      She didn't already know this?

      1. R C Dean   11 years ago

        She lives in a cloud of consensus beltway smug. It can be hard to see through the choking billows.

        1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

          Althouse? I haven't seen that.

          1. SIV   11 years ago

            Katherine Mangu-Ward once made Ann Althouse cry at... a cocktail party!

            1. Spoonman.   11 years ago

              That is awesome.

        2. Enough About Palin   11 years ago

          "She lives in a cloud of consensus beltway smug"

          I read Althouse everyday; I respectfully disagree.

          1. SIV   11 years ago

            She tears up over the Civil Rights Act.
            See above

            1. Enough About Palin   11 years ago

              Well she doesn't live in the beltway, she lives in Madison, Wisconsin. She's also not smug.

              1. SIV   11 years ago

                The cocktail party was in Chi-town so it wasn't a "Beltway event".

              2. Entropy Void   11 years ago

                Name one who lives in Madison that is not smug.

        3. Irish   11 years ago

          She lives in a cloud of consensus beltway smug.

          Huh. I was unaware the Beltway stretched as far west as Madison, Wisconsin.

        4. R C Dean   11 years ago

          Hell, i was thinking McArdle. Sorry

    2. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

      Would it actually surprise anyone to learn that the Obamacare exchanges were written using punch cards? Klein might just have some insider information.

    3. Enough About Palin   11 years ago

      Original Mike said...
      Punch cards are so old, they were used to write the Constitution, Ezra.
      12/2/13, 2:13 PM

  27. JW   11 years ago

    Venezuela has had another massive power outage, which the president is blaming on sabotage and not the nation's economy collapsing or anything.

    It's good to see that Baghdad Bob has moved up in the world.

  28. Ted S.   11 years ago

    Is "that British lizard guy" in the alt-text a reference to Piers Morgan?

    1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      Blackadder?

      1. Swiss Servator, referendiffic!   11 years ago

        +1 cunning plan

    2. PD Scott   11 years ago

      The Gecko has a sad.

    3. Boisfeuras   11 years ago

      David Icke?

  29. Coeus   11 years ago

    First, got a few "skeptic" links:

    Stop Asking "What Did You Expect?"

    The sentiment behind commercials that portray them as bumbling does not lead to cis men being banned from, say, entering china shops. The notion that they will have sex with anything and everything has not led to mandatory chastity belts for cis men. As seemingly anti-male notions do not lead them to be stripped of their power, agency, and authority across society, they don't represent oppression ? but they do have an effect. The liberation of lowered expectations is a not-insignificant part of male privilege.

    This is completely insane. I don't even know how to respond to this. And this from the group who blames everything on men, and wants to put the entire onus of sexual enjoyment for both parties on men.

    1. John   11 years ago

      The liberation of lowered expectations is a not-insignificant part of male privilege.

      So I guess women had it made when people expected them to not be able to think like men. And black people enjoyed a golden age when people thought them too stupid to do anything but menial or at most trade labor.

      1. PD Scott   11 years ago

        Why won't they think of all the fainting couch builders or smelling salt bottlers who have been put out of work by the expectation that women are competent and tough?

    2. Rich   11 years ago

      Think of a father being praised for taking his child out for an ice cream cone where a mother would have been shamed for having fed her child unhealthy desserts

      Think of a number -- ANY number.

      1. mad libertarian guy   11 years ago

        Think of a father being praised for taking his child out for an ice cream cone where a mother would have been shamed for having fed her child unhealthy desserts

        Actually, I don't have to imagine it at all.

        As a stay-at-home dad I get this shit all of the fucking time, ad it's goddamn annoying. People expect that my kids should act retarded and barely have the ability to swallow because their father is the primary child raiser in the household.

        What I really want to say is "Yes, bitch, my kids are fucking polite. They're that way because I make goddamn sure they are, not because they happened to get smacked by the polite branch this morning."

        1. Mickey Rat   11 years ago

          The "polite branch" is not the switch you had them cut this morning?

    3. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

      OK, I have to ask what this whole cis thing means?

      1. Medical Physics Guy   11 years ago

        Brace yourself...

        cisgendered

        1. Rich   11 years ago

          cisgender [describes] "individuals who have a match between the gender they were assigned at birth, their bodies, and their personal identity"

          Dammit, MPG, I *thought* I understood cis.

          But now I find myself asking "What are individuals who have a match between their bodies and their personal identity, but *not* with the gender their parents had hoped for at conception?"

          1. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

            Chinese girls?

            1. Medical Physics Guy   11 years ago

              The Lady Boys of Bangkok?

            2. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

              +1 child only

      2. Nikki just says no   11 years ago

        You identify with the gender that you appear physiologically to be, and you also want to have sex with people of the opposite gender.

        1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

          It's Newspeak for "not a pervert."

          1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

            Pervert seems like such a strong word for non-cisgendered folks when we have a documentary about people fucking Donkeys up thread.

            1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

              Did you see the one about the chicken fucker? That kid was messed up. He wasn't even ashamed, which, from my cis-whatever privileged perspective, is whack, yo.

              1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

                Aw, but he loved the chicken and the chicken seemed fond of him to whatever degree the descendants of dinosaurs feel fondness.

                I also liked Andrew Mendoza with "I ain't going to lie, I blew a nut in the horse. I then got off the bucket and put my clothes back on and left."

            2. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

              That was a goat. She only thought she was a donkey.

              1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

                I'd forgotten about the Kenyan man and the goat.

                In this thread we've referenced Columbian donkey fuckers, a Kenyan goat fucker, Nicaraguan chicken fuckers and Andrew Mendoza, who blew a nut in a horse hoping to make a horse-man baby because his girlfriend failed to call him back in a timely manner.

                I wonder if I can find that video that some friends found while working compliance at Myspace of a Japanese matron filling some girl's bum with eels (probably nematodes or planaria actually) and then having her spray them all over the place while the matron cackled.

                1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

                  In this thread we've referenced Columbian donkey fuckers, a Kenyan goat fucker, Nicaraguan chicken fuckers and Andrew Mendoza, who blew a nut in a horse hoping to make a horse-man baby because his girlfriend failed to call him back in a timely manner.

                  Is this what college administrators mean when they speak of "diversity"?

                  1. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

                    You call that diversity? Only one of those creatures isn't a mammal!

                2. Agammamon   11 years ago

                  And we wonder why Postrel is afraid to look at the comments.

            3. PapayaSF   11 years ago

              I'm being flippant. No offense intended. Of course there are many ways of being a pervert.

              1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

                I figured. It was a fun opportunity for doubling down on a bestiality heavy thread.

        2. Rhywun   11 years ago

          You identify with the gender that you appear physiologically to be, and you also want to have sex with people of the opposite gender.

          FTFY

      3. Boisfeuras   11 years ago

        OK, I have to ask what this whole cis thing means?

        It's a term idiots use to inform you of the fact.

    4. Medical Physics Guy   11 years ago

      So do the PC style guidelines now require replacing "men" with "cis men" in every instance? That is so insane.

      1. Rich   11 years ago

        Very well. "Cis boom bah", then.

    5. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

      has not led to mandatory chastity belts for cis men

      A small part of the cis man population is sad.

    6. Nikki just says no   11 years ago

      The notion that they will have sex with anything and everything has not led to mandatory chastity belts for cis men.

      But it does lead to them being banned or side-eyed from children's parks, being blackballed from careers like early childcare, etc...

      1. Medical Physics Guy   11 years ago

        Not if you are the mighty Teacher Tom, one of my favorite ed blogs.

      2. Coeus   11 years ago

        As always, nikki finds the other logic errors first. Where you been nik? My antifeminist pm links crusade just hasn't been the same.

    7. Redmanfms   11 years ago

      The liberation of lowered expectations is a not-insignificant part of male privilege.

      So what she's really saying is that woman were experiencing female privilege when they enjoyed lower expectations of professional achievement and income earning in the days of pre-feminism?

  30. Caleb Turberville   11 years ago

    http://thefederalist.com/2013/.....any-banks/

    Wait, Matt Yglesias doesn't know what he's talking about?

    1. John   11 years ago

      Read the author of that post's bio

      http://thefederalist.com/author/seandavis/

      He is a bit of a government hack. But he has actually worked in government and has held real jobs.

      Sad Beard in contrast?

      1. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

        Even so he's still sane.

        http://thefederalist.com/2013/.....ouseholds/

    2. Cytotoxic   11 years ago

      I hate to do this, but excessive bank fragmentation is a problem in America because of inter-state banking restrictions. Canada does not have these and our banks are strong. We have the opposite problem of too little competition.

      1. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

        Bank fragmentation is NOT a problem.

        I'm sure as we shrink the number of banks, shylocks will happily take the place of some of them.

        1. mauricegirodias   11 years ago

          Payday lenders pretty much have replaced small banks for a certain part of the population.

    3. Killaz   11 years ago


      By Sean Davis
      December 3, 2013
      Hangout with us

      "America has 6,891 banks," Slate blogger and certified financial non-expert Matthew Yglesias writes in his Moneybox column. "And that's too many."

      Why is that? According to Yglesias, it's because small banks are poorly managed, unregulated, and can't compete. It's an interesting argument, to the extent that 2+2=7 is an interesting argument, but Yglesias fails to support a single assertion with a verifiable fact or source citation. Not one. Of the seven assertions made in the first two paragraphs (spanning a whole five sentences), not one has a supporting citation.

      Galbraithian social democrats. Small businesses have ideas of their own, implement them, succeed, and crash the system set up by controllers and cronies. Entrepreneurs are enemies of the Public Good who are disruptive of a stable social order, and create ruin through speculation. Their risks taking doesn't just effect them if things go awry but have negative externalities that effect everyone by making us all the poorer for it.

      That is what they believe. Completely skewered from reality, proven wrong the first time it was tried, and we got the stagnation that accumulated from their policies in the 70s from it, as well as the failed experiment of the Obama administration, but they keep clinging bitterly to their reactionary love of bureaucratic control no matter what.

      1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

        We just need one, huge, national bank. Much more efficient that way.

        1. JWatts   11 years ago

          And we'll call it the Federal Reserve. And it will be run by Top Men.

    4. Jordan   11 years ago

      Damn, that was an epic smackdown.

      1. Killaz   11 years ago

        If Sadbeard had any self respect he would stop writing altogether after making an apology along the lines of, 'It's clear that I have been just pulling shit out of my ass all of this time, but what I didn't realize until now, after Sean Davis meticulously proved every sentence in my latest screed to be factually not correct, a lie if you prefer, is that everyone else can see what I that I'm just pulling shit out of my ass except for the useful idiots that run in progressive social circles. I underestimated you all, my bad.'

        1. Killaz   11 years ago

          everyone else can see what I that I'm just pulling shit out of my ass except for the useful idiots that run in progressive social circles.

    5. Spoonman.   11 years ago

      His refusal to provide any evidentiary support of this assertion is entirely defensible; none exists.

      OWNED

  31. Karl Hungus   11 years ago

    If you've ever wondered what happens when you watch porn with your parrot in the room . . . well, here you go:

    http://www.thepoke.co.uk/2013/.....ur-parrot/

    *** NOT SAFE FOR WORK ***

    1. PD Scott   11 years ago

      This is why there are no female libertarian parrots.

      1. Karl Hungus   11 years ago

        And thank God for that. Birdlike women belong with the Dems.

        1. PD Scott   11 years ago

          "Paulie want a cracker" but does Paulie DESERVE the cracker?

          1. Karl Hungus   11 years ago

            Paulie's gotta earn that bitch. But as far as I'm concerned, this bird has more than earned its cracker.

    2. Generic Stranger   11 years ago

      I watched a documentary on parrots the other day. The thing about them is when they bond with their owners, it's a sexual bond.

      Think about that while that parrot is rubbing against that guy's palm and moaning.

      1. Karl Hungus   11 years ago

        So in a roundabout, passive sort of way, that guy was jerking off his parrot.

        Do you suppose that counts as bestiality?

        1. Generic Stranger   11 years ago

          In the same way that a dog humping your leg does, though usually you stop that instead of just let it happen...

  32. Coeus   11 years ago

    More from the logic queen herself

    4. But here's the rub: the Beastie Boys' song did not appear in this ad. The song in the ad is a clear parody of and political comment on the original. No one is "hiding behind fair use:" this kind of parody is exactly the kind of speech that should be protected from being silenced by parties with more money and lawyers. Had McDonald's made a parody where the word "girls" was changed to "grills" and it was all about how delicious hamburgers are, the Beastie Boys and Faraci may have had a point. Instead, the GoldieBlox suit makes it plainly obvious that this parody stands in direct opposition to the original song:

    ...

    I am most certainly not a lawyer, and so I cannot say for sure whether this qualifies as "fair use." All I know is that this is political speech that absolutely should be protected, regardless of whether it's also persuading people to buy a product. The Beastie Boys have attempted to silence an apt criticism of their song using a lawyer's letterhead, and that's not cool.

    1. Zeb   11 years ago

      Oh good god. I'd say that is fair use, but the argument that a small, nice company has more of a right to parody popular songs than a large company that the author disapproves of is a bit ridiculous.

    2. SIV   11 years ago

      Yes, GoldieBlox is a company; yes, they are selling something for money; but that's where the likeness ends. GoldieBlox has a point of view ? a mission, even ? and a hell of a lot of people think it's a good mission.

      Chick-fil-A has a mission too.

  33. Coeus   11 years ago

    And from the comments:

    inkpixel November 28, 2013, 12:09 am Log in to Reply
    On the subject of for-profit violations of musicians' and artists' copyright, one glaring example would be online music sharing, which profits those who sell advertisements on the download sites, and which is usually nowhere close to a parody or "fair use." I find it interesting that my more libertarian friends accept downloading as ethical, or at least inevitable and good, responding with phrases like "people get exposure that way" and "you can't stop it, you might as well go along with it" and "information should be free." Yet when the violation in question is a political statement from a for-profit or non-profit related to feminism or social justice more generally, I hear crickets chirping?

    To be fair, the GoldiBlox company protects its own copyright, I'm sure, so maybe there's an attitude of "if you dish it out, you should be willing to take it." But still, for all the good I'm told that free intellectual property can do, a good portion of the staunch advocates of such freedom go silent in cases where good is actually done (and harm is minimal).

    1. R C Dean   11 years ago

      On the subject of for-profit violations of musicians' and artists' copyright,

      Thinking that whether you charge for your unauthorized use of someone else's material is at all relevant to claims of copyright violation, is a pretty sure sign that you don't know dick about copyright.

      1. Coeus   11 years ago

        When the "feels" are right, intelligent people who've actually thought about the distinction between public and private use should throw it out the window. Because apparently not doing so makes them hypocrites.

  34. Cytotoxic   11 years ago

    Here is an article on the recent Iran 'deal' that is superior to anything Reason has or will have.

    http://fullcomment.nationalpos.....means-war/

    Some say a bad peace is better than a good war. I'm not sure. Perhaps it would be if it lasted, but a bad peace is usually just a prelude to a bad war.

    1. R C Dean   11 years ago

      If a bad peace is better than a good war, then I can't see any reason for any country to ever fight an invader.

      1. Zeb   11 years ago

        It's a tricky question, I think. And depends a lot on who you are and your place in society as well as who it is you might want to have a war with. I suspect that for a lot of just plain poor working people, a bad peace would be better than a good war.

        1. Zeb   11 years ago

          Reminds me of the old Italian guy in Rome in Catch 22 who explains that the Italians are very strong exactly because they are very weak.

      2. CE   11 years ago

        But once there's an invader, the bad peace is over.

  35. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Powerball winner dies penniless and alone 12 years after winning $27 million

    A Powerball winner has died broke and all alone in hospice care, just 12 years after raking in $27million cash from a lottery jackpot.
    David Lee Edwards, a convicted felon from Ashland, Kentucky, bought a mansion in a gated community, dozens of expensive cars and even a LearJet with the share of a record $280million jackpot he won in August 2001.
    But drug addiction and his free-spending ways left Edwards and his wife Shawna broke and living in a squalid storage unit contaminated with human feces within five years. Shawna left him not long after and remarried.

    I think this is a good example of how people's poor decisions and inability to control themselves--and not just a simple lack of money--is a major factor in poverty.

    1. John   11 years ago

      Poverty is a cultural problem not a monetary one.

      1. Enough About Palin   11 years ago

        Yes. Many if not most of my poor neighbors are in that situation due to poor life planning. Though to be fair, a good many of them had no examples to follow.

        1. Rich   11 years ago

          a good many of them had no examples to follow.

          That's what *public schooling* is for, duh.

          1. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

            Yes, public schools provide no good examples to follow.

    2. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

      None of that would have happened if we had a $17/hour living wage.

      1. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

        All a $17 an hour living minimum wage will do is triple the price of lottery tickets.

        1. JWatts   11 years ago

          In which case, he couldn't have afforded a lottery ticket, and none of that would have happened. /derp

    3. Enough About Palin   11 years ago

      Yes.

    4. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

      There is a direct correlation between habits and choices?

      🙁

  36. Sevo   11 years ago

    It looks like the guy held in NK was reliving his glory days:
    "US vet detained in NKorea oversaw guerrilla group"
    "Now South Koreans who served with Merrill Newman, who is beginning his sixth week in detention, say their unit was perhaps the most hated and feared by the North and his association with them may be the reason he's being held."
    http://www.sfgate.com/news/wor.....029684.php
    I wish him well, but it sure looks like he was twisting the tiger's tail.

  37. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    Gillian Anderson poses nude--with an eel wrapped around her chest

    X-Files star Gillian Anderson, 46, has decided to get completely naked and pose with a newfound friend in the form of a large conger eel to support Fishlove?a campaign designed to highlight the issue of collapsing fish stocks, with the message being that British taxpayers' money is being given to French fishing trawlers to destroy the deep seabed in British waters.

    A petition, for which this image of Anderson?and others like it? was created for, has been launched in support of Fishlove.

    "Amazing animals that live in the deep ocean are being systematically destroyed by massive fishing nets that catch or crush everything in their path," reads the petition. "But in days, the European Parliament could vote to protect one of the world's most precious deep-sea habitats?and we need to give them the public mandate to do it.

    1. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

      Looks tasty.

      1. Restoras   11 years ago

        The eel? I agree.

  38. Enough About Palin   11 years ago

    highlight the issue of collapsing fish stocks

    Note to self: short fish stocks.

  39. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

    San Antonio cop allegedly shoots over wife-swapping plan gone bad

    Police on Monday identified the accused officer, Frankie Salazar, in the report.

    He has been placed on leave with pay pending administrative action, according to the Olmos Park Police Department.

    Salazar, 29, and the man who was shot through the chest and hand, Jesus Edward Guitron, had been discussing swapping sexual partners for several months, a female witness told police.
    [...]
    Another woman, 29,...became upset with Salazar for not telling her what he was planning, according to the report. She began arguing with Salazar, and the first woman walked out and tried to get Guitron to leave with her, according to police.

    Before they could leave, Salazar and Guitron got into a fistfight, and Salazar told the 29-year-old woman to get his gun, according to police.

    The 29-year-old woman said she grabbed Salazar's .45-caliber Springfield XDS pistol, and when she walked back into the hallway she saw that Guitron had Salazar in a neck hold. The woman told police she shot at Guitron "just to scare him," but didn't know if she had shot him or not.
    [...]
    The other woman and Guitron tried to leave, but at the front entrance Salazar shot three times, the woman leaving with Guitron said. She ran but then saw Guitron lying in the street and realized he was shot, she said.

    1. font_of_stupidity   11 years ago

      See, we should only have firearms in the responsible hands of law enforcement.

    2. Coeus   11 years ago

      Trying to follow what happened there was harder than reading un-commented code.

  40. Archduke von Pantsfan   11 years ago

    FIFA confirms pots for World Cup draw

    To make the number in each pot equal, at the start of the draw one of the nine European teams will be drawn into Pot 2, and will definitely face one of the seeded South American sides.

    1. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

      Looks like France got bailed out again. I think this system is fair though (in the context of keeping confederations spread out, which I agree with). If FIFA were more transparent about shit it wouldn't look so dirty.

    2. CE   11 years ago

      Why is Pete Rose coaching Mexico?

  41. Mokers   11 years ago

    US High School Students Slide in Math, Reading and Science Performance

    "While the U.S. spends more per student than most countries, this does not translate into better performance. For example, the Slovak Republic, which spends around USD 53,000 per student, performs at the same level as the United States, which spends over USD 115,000 per student."

    Yet something tells me any education reform bill is going to focus on how we aren't spending enough to educate the children and how we don't pay teachers enough.

    1. Rich   11 years ago

      What is *class size*, chopped liver?

    2. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

      Dobre

    3. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

      We spend more PER student, but we spend almost nothing ON students.

      Even a teacher can figure out that more education money only means more administrators. And more administrators mean more red tape and less teaching.

      The only thing worse than a teacher is a teacher with an administrator by its side.

    4. hamilton   11 years ago

      Let's see... pupil-teacher ratio going down every year, real teacher pay going up every year, per-pupil expenditures going up every year, scores consistently mediocre or declining....

      What was that they called two variables when, changing one, the other was unaffected? Oh, yeah: uncorrelated.

    5. JWatts   11 years ago

      "In mathematics, 29 nations and other jurisdictions outperformed the United States by a statistically significant margin, up from 23 three years ago," reports . "In science, 22 education systems scored above the U.S. average, up from 18 in 2009.

      "In reading, 19 other locales scored higher than U.S. students ? a jump from nine in 2009, when the last assessment was performed."

      I blame Bush!11!

  42. Archduke von Pantsfan   11 years ago

    Fear can be inherited through sperm

    1. mr lizard   11 years ago

      And I'll this time I thought I was just giving them a full dose of Act Right.

  43. Archduke von Pantsfan   11 years ago

    For the first time in 40 years, a majority of Americans say the US plays a less important and powerful role in the world than it did a decade ago

    1. John   11 years ago

      Smart Diplomacy.

  44. Coeus   11 years ago

    This, from the guy who is convinced that three heavily miscontrued cases that stand your ground is a racist law:

    This is not like finding a dime-bag in someone's pocket, or even catching someone with a vial of crack. People who assault other people for amusement should be prosecuted. Understanding this, it's also worth pointing out that, in terms of long-term trends, we are in the midst of a historic dip

    But since the days of slavery, into the days of super-predators, and now the time of the Knockout Game, there has always been a strong need to believe that hordes of young black men will overrun the country in a fit of raping and pillaging. It's how we justify ourselves. Information can't compete with national myth.

    And then he links to a piece which says violent crime is actually rising since 2011, and it's all in the category if simple assaults.

    1. Coeus   11 years ago

      But hey, we know what he wants. He's always talking about our "violent gun culture". It's cause he he believes that you should be able to punch someone who's walking behind you on the sidewalk, but you shouldn't be able to shoot someone who does it:

      Richard_Ewell14 Laura Toepfer ? 2 years ago ?
      If Zimmerman was walking away, back to his truck, why is Martin justified in punching him? If Zimmerman asks him who he is and what he's doing, why is Martin justified in punching him?
      Too many suggestions that the proper response in a situation like this is to start swinging.
      13 ?Reply?Share ?
      Avatar
      Ta-Nehisi Coates Mod Richard_Ewell14 ? 2 years ago
      Agreed. Along with too many suggestions that the proper response is to submit yourself to the inquiries of a strange man who follows you in truck, and then chases you through a housing development. Evidently you should regard him as Officer Friendly, even if he has no badge.

      Not attacking means submitting. And in earlier articles he's talked about jumping people in his neighborhood with friends. He just doesn't see it as much of a big deal, and wonders why whitey's panties are all up in a bunch about it.

  45. Archduke von Pantsfan   11 years ago

    A reader writes:
    My boyfriend says he's bisexual and doesn't always find me attractive.
    He only wants sex once a week and says he might not be able to give me what I need. Is this problem to do with me?

    1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

      Nope, he's gay and using bisexuality as a bridge orientation.* Dump him and find someone who loves you for your internal reproductive organs.

      Unless you're ugly or a harpy and he's trying to not turn you into an emotion monster while he looks for a good way to break it off. Then of course it's your fault.

      But he's still mostly gay.

      *not making a claim about bisexuality in men, just that this guy is a homo, not bi (or dating a harpy).

      1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   11 years ago

        "Honey, I'm not gay, I just prefer dicks."

      2. Coeus   11 years ago

        I would think that if he's mostly gay, he'd be banging more than once a week. This seems more like the limited options on the hetero scene for 80% percent of guys taking it's toll like in the Muslim countries.

        More of a "prison arrangement", if you will. I know a guy who did that in college. He's married to a chick now. And no religious conversion.

        1. Coeus   11 years ago

          Never mind, it's a chick writing. Statement retracted.

          1. Coeus   11 years ago

            But don't overlook the fact that she may be both fat and unmotivated in bed.

        2. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

          My sister had a girlfriend when she was in an all girl's rehab program for over a year. My plotzed but she went back to dick (with vigor) as soon as she was out.

          Margaret Cho made a joke about it when she was still funny at the beginning of her career (starting at 3:30):

          So I had sex with a woman on the ship and I went through this whole thing. I was like, am I gay? Am I straight? And I realized, I'm just slutty. ...Where's my parade?

    2. John   11 years ago

      If he doesn't always find you attractive, he doesn't ever find you attractive. He is gay dear.

      1. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

        Women aren't always attractive. Sometimes they're irresistible and other times the same woman can be a raging harpy.

        1. John   11 years ago

          I don't think she is talking about him not finding her attractive when she is on the rag in a night shirt with her hair in a pony tail. I think she means he doesn't always find her attractive when she is trying to be attractive. He is gay.

          1. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

            I'll concede that, assuming she's not shaped like a beach ball.

  46. Jordan   11 years ago

    Obama still hasn't signed up for Obamacare.

    I guess he's not a complete retard.

  47. Paul.   11 years ago

    Young People Still Don't Grasp Obamacare

    I heard this on NPR today. From my perspective, this helps Obama more than it hurts him. To wit, the Gallup pollster referenced dips in support for Obamacare coming from the higher-information voter. No real change in perception from the 18-29s- the group with the least knowledge about the ACA. So from my perspective, Obama's continuous reliance on the low-information voter helps him.

    1. Medical Physics Guy   11 years ago

      I think there are a lot of 18-26s that will find out a lot about it real quick when they turn 27

      1. Paul.   11 years ago

        By that time, Obama won't care.

        1. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

          He already doesn't care.

          1. Paul.   11 years ago

            *Bam*

        2. PD Scott   11 years ago

          But his LEGACY!

  48. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

    Someone posted an article by a gawktard bemoaning the Daniel Defense ad nix by the nfl. It was bad enough of a link that I thought it deserved a shot at the pm links.

    A sample:

    That is how a kinda-savvy gun company commodifies the dissent of unsavvy gun nuts. Never mind that anyone who thinks an AR-15 or its shorter cousin, the M-4, is a valuable home-defense weapon is a shit-for-brains lemming. The gun's high-velocity, low-caliber, low-weight slugs won't stop shit up close, as those guys in Somalia and Iraq and Afghanistan have learned pretty succinctly. If you really want a home defense weapon, if you really want to open your family up to the high statistical probability that one of them will be killed or maimed at your well-intentioned hands, get a shotgun, or a large-caliber pistol, and get some training.

    So an AR will plow through a crowd of movie goers but can't kill one home invader? Odd how the gun can decide when to become a high power killing machine.

    1. Paul.   11 years ago

      And plow through a classroom full of kids, but not the thug in your livingroom at 2 am. Yeah, cognitive disconnect ad nauseam.

      1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

        Not to mention that handguns, though less powerful, have the problem of over-penetration in a home environment. Rounds for an AR, especially ones designed to do so, fragment upon hitting building materials.

        1. Killaz   11 years ago

          Exactly right. This is what I'm looking at to compliment my home defense.

          http://carteach0.blogspot.com/.....ntrol.html

          A pal uses this, but I've been too lazy to do my own upgrading. Maybe after the holiday season.

        2. Paul.   11 years ago

          To be fair, you can purchase home defense rounds that flare or fragment when hitting stuff like sheet rock.

          But yes, off-the-shelf handgun ammo will penetrate like a mofo.

          Also, this guy needs to disabuse himself of the "shotgun myth". Somewhere out there there's a rather scientific assessment and video of standard shotgun penetration through home materials and walls, and they penetrate with killing power-- all the way down to bird shot.

          1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

            I was just gonna respond to killaz above to say something similar.

            Personally, I have a 12g with 2 3/4 buckshot for bedside protection and either my 9mm carry piece or a walther ppk (if I'm feeling lazy) on me.

            I don't have an AR right now, or I'd probably use that. I do have a mini-14 but it's a bit unwieldy for home defense.

            Me and my Pa went to the range one day with a bunch of materials to test penetration and

            1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

              wtf...

              and .223 did well without over penetrating, 12g 3' slugs went through anything we put in front of it, 9mm +p critical duty went through a bunch of shit, .357 plowed through everything, .25 acp didn't go through much, etc.

              We did a bunch of other calibers but you get the gist of it. I should of went about it scientifically and recorded the results, but we were just fucking around destroying old building supply stuff. Should of video recorded it and put it up on the youtube.

              1. cavalier973   11 years ago

                Your gun shoots three foot slugs? You might consider a less unwieldy form of ammo.

          2. mad libertarian guy   11 years ago

            Welcome to the Box-o-Truth.

            1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

              Just what I need...

              Another website to throw my time into. Looks awesome.

            2. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

              Looks like he got the .223 to penetrate much further than we did. When we did it we had all the materials together with no gaps, so that might have had something to do with it. I think his method more accurately mirrors what a bullet will do inside a home.

              1. Gray Ghost   11 years ago

                Ol' Painless is a lot of fun to read. His research dovetails with some of the other stuff I've read from wound ballisticians. IIRC, 5.56 overpenetration is really dependent on what type of bullet is used. I've read good things about light, fast stuff like 55 gr TAP going right to pieces after a few interior walls, whereas heavier built 75 gr stuff would keep on trucking. But a lot of terminal ballistics can be summed up with: "it depends."

                FWIW, the 123 grain 7.62 x 39 FMJ used in the AK-47 is not know for exhibiting the violent fragmentation that SS109/M855 shows at high velocity. High velocity is the key. At lower velocities, such as found at longer ranges, the SS109 bullet can't be relied upon to fragment in tissue. This lack of fragmentation means that less tissue is destroyed, with a corresponding drop in lethality. Hence all of the anecdotal bitching about hitting Afghanis 5-8 times and having them keep on going. Shorter barrels drop muzzle velocity, exacerbating the effect. Still not volunteering to be shot by one.

                7.62 x 39 does yaw like a mother in gelatin though.

                One thing I don't think's been mentioned yet is the drastically lower recoil of an AR-15 versus a 12 gauge. My slightly-built GF still thinks ARs are heavy, but the recoil's manageable. I don't think the same'd be true for 3 in magnum 00 Buck with damned near 1 7/8 oz of lead.

                1. Gray Ghost   11 years ago

                  Oh, and one very interesting idea in handgun defense loads is taking advantage of the very long cylinder in revolvers like the Judge, to seat a very long copper bullet. What does that get you? The long bullet will mushroom very predictably, and the giant length means the swept area by the 'petals' will be much greater than usual for a .45LC bullet. According to the linked article's video, a 2 inch wide mushroom is not unusual. Considering I'm ecstatic at the idea of getting nearly an inch in width out of the .45 ACP ammo I use, and considering the lethality of nearly all handgun bullets is directly proportional to how much tissue they crush, crushing twice the tissue is pretty damned interesting.

                  1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

                    Dang man, that gel block was beaten like a red headed stepchild when mom burns the meatloaf. Those petals were artistic in their fanning. Jesus.

                    That's a scary round.

                    Now I'm gonna have to buy a goddamn judge.

    2. Corning   11 years ago

      The gun's high-velocity, low-caliber, low-weight slugs won't stop shit up close

      Huh?

      So I put a bullet center mass right through a home invader...

      I am pretty sure the fucker is stopped at that point.

      as those guys in Somalia and Iraq and Afghanistan have learned pretty succinctly.

      What the fuck? What guys?

      1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

        Right. Is he saying that they use the AK-47 because they've done extensive research of the comparative ballistics of medium power rifle rounds and found the 5.56 NATO round lacking?

        It couldn't be that the world is flooded with cheap AKs and they work after you fill them with camel shit.

        Or, is he trying to say that we should forget the AR for home defense and move to fully automatic Kalashnikovs? Because I fully support people using fully automatic AK-47s for home defense.

        1. mad libertarian guy   11 years ago

          I think what he's meaning to say is that in some places there are men who show off their bullet wounds that they survived from being shot.

          Which is true.

          What this dick bag doesn't get is that although the .223 is the most common caliber for an AR, it's by no means the only one.

          1. Tejicano   11 years ago

            " The gun's high-velocity, low-caliber, low-weight slugs won't stop shit up close"

            Ah, yeah. Up close is the one place where the 5.56mm round IS effective. It's out at distance - 100 to 300 meters - where most combat happens which can be iffy.

            "I think what he's meaning to say is that in some places there are men who show off their bullet wounds that they survived from being shot."

            Agreed. The other side of this coin is that the other large percentage of men who were shot in combat died - thus are not around to show off those wounds.

            1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

              The other side of this coin is that the other large percentage of men who were shot in combat died - thus are not around to show off those wounds.

              Yeah, we could still be using M1 Garands at .30-06 and there'd be a guy or two that lives to show his scars off.

              Not that I think the author of the original article was making any kind of cogent point about the capabilities of various combat rifles, i.e. I think MLG gives him too much credit. I think he was making a point that would be understood emotionally by fellow gawker readers, but rendered potemkinesque upon further investigation.

  49. John   11 years ago

    http://thefederalist.com/2013/.....-yglesias/

    Someone else is offended by Sad Beard's abuse of the English language.

    1. Killaz   11 years ago

      Is that a pic of Sad Beard at the top? Looks like an even creepier David Cross.

      1. John   11 years ago

        My spelling and homonym problems are legendary on here. But in my defense I can honestly say I have never proof read a single thing I have posted. I consider it a bit of a running joke now not to and just let the misspellings fall where they may. This, however, is an internet bulletin board. I don't get paid to do this and do it in between my horrible boring job to pass the time. Sad Beard in contrast gets paid to write. He writes that crap, looks at it knowing it is going to be published in a magazine for the world and thinks "this is good". That says all you need to know about him.

  50. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

    Are Americans just fucking stupid or is this actually an example of Gresham's Law in action?

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/28/us/one-dollar-coins/

    1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

      Years ago Reason published an article which began something like: "You wouldn't think it was possible to make money that people didn't like, but the US Treasury often does it." It was a sad history of the recent dollar coins, the $2 bill, and other missteps.

      1. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

        At the very least, if Obamacare can be shoved down the throats of a nation that does not want it, why the fuck can't a one dollar coin REPLACE a dollar bill?

        Meanwhile, Canada seems to survive using 1- AND 2-dollar coins.

        1. Leigh   11 years ago

          I hate fucking coins. Actually I hate shit in my pockets - coins just make it worse. When I'm at work, my wallet and keys go on the desk - at home they go on a counter. Only time when I have shit in my pockets is when I'm not at home or work. Coins are just a pain to deal with. Fortunately, these days, you don't even need cash - my AmEx does almost everything.

          1. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

            So you're voting for "fucking stupid".

            1. Leigh   11 years ago

              ???

              See what happens with coins in my house is at the end of day, all my change goes into a big can. Then some day in the future I can take that big can and go to Vegas to gambol it away. These days, that can grows very slowly - as I said, plastic has pretty much replaced the need for cash. So, the worse you can say is I pull money out of circulation for a while.

            2. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

              I don't get it. Are you calling people "fucking stupid" for having different preferences in currency forms than you?

          2. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

            Actually I hate shit in my pockets...

            PROTIP:

            That's not where it goes.

        2. mad libertarian guy   11 years ago

          As a tourist in Canada I can say emphatically that the worst part about Canada is having $25 worth of fucking loonies and twonies in my pocket at the end of the day.

          Fuck coins.

        3. Agammamon   11 years ago

          Why would you want this? Coins are fucking heavy. I lived in Italy for 3 1/2 years and then only thing I don't miss is walking around with a pocket full of 1 and 2 euro coins pulling my pants down.

          1. Gozer the Gozerian   11 years ago

            The answer is in the article: Coins are cheaper, a lot cheaper.

            1. Agammamon   11 years ago

              Fuck that - dollars are lighter, a lot lighter.

              If its so expensive to print them then maybe they should consider printing fewer.

              1. Gozer the Gozerian   11 years ago

                So, you actually agree, in a roundabout sort of way?

  51. Coeus   11 years ago

    Marcotte forgets who she runs with now:

    I have a very simple request to put out there for pundits, journalists, scientists, etc: If you're going to argue with "feminists", could you take the time to bother quoting even just one who has the argument you claim they have? Paul Bloom is a researcher who wrote a piece for the NY Times arguing against the contention that feeling lust for or even just seeing someone naked necessarily means you objectify and demean them. He feels that this argument needs to be made because of all those terrible "feminists" with their terrible talk about "objectification" and wah.

    It seems to me Bloom and his team would construct even better studies if they were responding to actual arguments made by real people in the real world?those religious fundamentalists come to mind?than the strawfeminists in their head.

    1. Coeus   11 years ago

      Oops.

      Regardless of the intent behind the calendars, regardless of how much fun we had making them, regardless of how empowering we found them, regardless of the racial and age diversity we showcased, and regardless of the fact that they were run by a woman and benefited women, pin-up calendars added to an existing environment in which women were seen first as sexual objects and maybe if they're lucky they'd later be seen as human beings with thoughts and desires of their own. Back in 2005, I thought skeptics weren't affected by the patriarchy and that misogyny was something left to the religious. In a community like that, a pin-up calendar of women would be absolutely fine. I learned that a community like that does not exist and it was naive of me to assume otherwise.

      1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

        Can anyone tell me what's actually wrong with objectification?

        I objectify men all the time and can still be friends with them, treat them like people, and am fairly good about not wantonly raping them.

        My sexy Romanian Orthodox priest wall calendar doesn't seem to harm anyone, why is it a bad thing?

        1. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

          Because the PC police don't care about actions, but words (or thoughts in this case). As far as they're concerned, you're doing it exactly backwards.

          1. jesse.in.mb   11 years ago

            So I should wantonly rape and then get to know them? Or only find them sexy once I get to know them and learn that they're mindless flesh golems with great abs and difficulty stringing sentences together?

            1. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

              Bill Clinton, for example, is everything feminists should hate, but they adore the guy because he means well. He doesn't, but that's another story. The left will excuse any action so long as they approve of the thoughts in your head.

              Leave that calendar up!

              1. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

                It makes more sense when you recall the low-quality women that Clinton objectified.

                1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

                  It makes more sense when you recall the low-quality women that Clinton objectified.

                  That's a good point. Maybe those, like Marcotte, that object to objectification actually only object the fact that it's not them being the ones objectified. Bill Clinton showed that sometimes the ugly girl does indeed get the hero in the end.

                  1. Tejicano   11 years ago

                    " sometimes the ugly girl does indeed get the hero in the end."

                    And sometimes she just gets the cigar.

                  2. Bobarian   11 years ago

                    Hero!?!

                    Unless you're talking about the sandwich, I don't think so!

        2. JW   11 years ago

          Can anyone tell me what's actually wrong with objectification?

          Nope. Thought and action are distinct concepts to most normal people. My seemingly near-infinite ability to think naughty thoughts towards attractive women that I've only passed on the street, in no way affects my ability to treat them with respect and as equals, on the personal level.

          Now, mind you, I'll still be thinking about nailing them the entire time I'm talking to them about the weather and that crass jerk next door.

        3. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

          Can anyone tell me what's actually wrong with objectification?

          Heterosexual white males do it.

          Any other group of people do it and it's OK.

        4. Agammamon   11 years ago

          Because they've confused 'objectify' with 'want to have sex with'.

          Objectify should mean - wants to have sex with you and will do anything necessary to manipulate you into getting in bed, even if that means flat out lying or coercing. It means using that person as a toy with no care for their needs/wants except in so far as they will fulfill your own.

          It *shouldn't* mean 'hey I just met you and this is crazy, wanna shag in the broom closet real quick?"

    2. PapayaSF   11 years ago

      It amazes me how often leftists will dismiss as fantasies genuine examples of leftist PC dogma. Point out examples of (e.g.) people being called "racists" for referring to Obama as from Chicago, or referring to a peanut butter sandwich in a school lesson, and they just won't accept them. They're all exaggerations or misunderstandings or meaningless exceptions or something.

      Maybe it's a selective blindness caused by the "no enemies on the left" attitude.

  52. Dave Krueger   11 years ago

    The State Department spent around $400,000 last year on booze.

    If you include what I spend on hookers, I got that beat.

    1. Bobarian   11 years ago

      The secret service has it's own budget, though

  53. cavalier973   11 years ago

    I know this is old news, now, but this write up about our chimp-swine ancestors makes an interesting statement:

    Dr. McCarthy does have a book about bird hybrids published by Oxford University Press, which appears to be his most recent published scientific work

    and again:

    note that the Daily Mail refers to Dr. McCarthy as a leading geneticist, even though some of his most recent genetics work was published in 2004

    The implication is that Dr. McCarthy isn't a "real scientist" because he hasn't published anything more recently than 2004.

    Well, his hypothesis seems like looney-tune level of silliness, but that doesn't mean he's not a "real scientist". He threw this idea out there last summer; I think he was joking (or, at least, half-joking), but even if he has proposed this as a serious hypothesis, by testing the hypothesis using the scientific method, he is "doing science". He'll most like find his hypothesis falsified, but he will still be a scientist.

  54. Kid Xenocles   11 years ago

    You know who else liked cocktails?

  55. cavalier973   11 years ago

    Another Hobby Lobby is trying to create JesusLand article.

    1. Gozer the Gozerian   11 years ago

      ...despite the fact that even the godfather of capitalism Adam Smith argued that government plays a critical role in establishing the playing field for private markets and fixing inherent inequalities in capitalism.

      How do you fix "inherent inequalities in capitalism" without, you know, socialism? That whole article was awful, but this really is above and beyond the call of Proggy.

      1. cavalier973   11 years ago

        I once heard some talk show host claim that Adam Smith was actually arguing for protectionism.

  56. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

    And that backing is what exactly?

  57. Agammamon   11 years ago

    And the US dollar differs how?

  58. Gozer the Gozerian   11 years ago

    I would assume that he is referring to government assets, such as the infamous and pharaonic gold hoard in Fort Knox, the Manhattan vault, etc.

    I suppose that, if such is indeed the argument, I can defend it in a qualified way: There is enough gold possessed by the US federal government (and some other nations) to allow for the re?stablishment of a gold standard on a healthy fractional-reserve basis. Whether that is an economically sound or advisable idea is something that is always fun to debate, but probably not of interest to many here...

  59. Gozer the Gozerian   11 years ago

    Top. Men.

    It's sometimes referred to as "the Ph.D. Standard."

  60. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

    Drones, aircraft carriers and nukes.

    And guns, lots of guns.

  61. Restoras   11 years ago

    Yeah right, you may as well bring up abortion, deep dish pizza, or circumcision.

  62. Gozer the Gozerian   11 years ago

    Sarc tags are for pussies.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Will Trump's Order To Lift U.S. Sanctions on Syria Be Followed?

Matthew Petti | 5.20.2025 4:00 PM

Judge Rules in Favor of New Hampshire Bakery in Fight Over Donut Mural

Emma Camp | 5.20.2025 3:20 PM

The Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects a 'Very Narrow Approach' to Deadly Force by Police

Jacob Sullum | 5.20.2025 3:00 PM

3 Terrible Companies To Lose $5 Billion in Federal Green Energy Loans

Jeff Luse | 5.20.2025 1:37 PM

Serious Immigration Law Enforcement Means Serious Destruction to American Liberty

Brian Doherty | 5.20.2025 12:16 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!