Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Colorado Obamacare Enrollment Even Worse Than Worst Case Projections, Anti-Smoking Groups Oppose Obamacare Tobacco Penalty, Texas Man Still in Prison Despite Having Conviction Overturned in 1980: P.M. Links

Ed Krayewski | 11.25.2013 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Helga Weber/Foter.com
(Helga Weber/Foter.com)
  • smoking
    Helga Weber/Foter.com

    Enrollment through Colorado's insurance exchange is barely half the projected worst case scenario, which officials say will make it difficult for the state "to deliver on promises made to Colorado citizens" and jeopardize the program's revenue stream. The American Lung Association and the American Cancer Society, both supporters of the Affordable Care Act, nevertheless oppose Obamacare's tobacco surcharge, arguing it will push smokers out of insurance policies and make it even more difficult for them to quit.

  • National Security Advisor Susan Rice is in Afghanistan, where she is expected to meet with Hamid Karzai to discuss the post-2014 security pact between the two countries.
  • The U.S. government reportedly turned a larger profit on student loans,$41.3 billion, than all but two companies worldwide, Exxon Mobil and Apple.
  • State police in New York have acquired 32 SUVs so that troopers can more easily peer into cars to catch drivers who are texting.
  • A Texas man has been in prison for more than 30 years despite having his conviction overturned and a new trial ordered in 1980.
  • A couple in the Florida Keys were mistakenly shipped 11 pounds of marijuana to a rental property in Louisiana. They turned the marijuana in to local police in Florida, who say the couple could've been arrested had cops discovered the marijuana while the couple was unknowingly driving it back to Florida.
  • Microsoft acknowledged a "very small number" of customers purchased Xbox Ones with serious disc reading issues. No blue screens reported.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.  You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here. 

Have a news tip? Send it to us!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Why Are Republicans, Israeli Officials Upset About the Iran Nuke Deal?

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (244)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    National Security Advisor Susan Rice is in Afghanistan, where she is expected to meet with Hamid Karzai to discuss the post-2014 security pact between the two countries.

    Hopefully no YouTubes come out.

    1. John   12 years ago

      Remember when you just had to vote for Obama because the evil Republicans were going to keep us in Afghanistan forever?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        Well, those people were idiots, because this was always Obama's "good" war.

        1. John   12 years ago

          He didn't mean that. That was just stuff he said to keep the Republicans from calling him soft.

          1. goneGalt   12 years ago

            May be he meant, "If you like your war, you can keep it".

      2. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

        Hey remember when we were told that getting women out of burkahs was important enough to spill American blood?

        11/25/13: Afghanistan 'plans to reintroduce public stoning as punishment for adultery'

        This says it all.

        1. John   12 years ago

          The good news is that no one outside of Kabul in Afghanistan listens to or cares about the central government. The entire affair is a classic example of Americans not understanding strategy and internalizing the Marxist bullshit that hatred comes from poverty and oppression.

          What we should have done in 2001 was invaded with everything we had and quickly had military tribunals using the establish rules from Nurmberg and within a few short months hanged everyone associated with the Taliban. Then we could have left telling the Afghans if anyone ever plans a terrorist attack against the US from there again we were coming back. We could have then left the Afghans to live as they want to secure in the knowledge that the next Arab who came over the hill talking war against the infidel would be hanged before nightfall.

          1. Bobarian   12 years ago

            The Pershing in the Philippines gambit?

            Need to bury the corpses with pig's blood, for good measure.

            That strategy would have probably been successful in AF, but would have really demonized us in the rest of the Islamic Countries.

            1. Bobarian   12 years ago

              Bush actually had the right idea in Afghanistan, but failed to pull all the way out after crushing the Taliban.

              Obama doubled down on the Iraq strategy while ignoring the significant differences in the two situations.

            2. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

              That strategy would have probably been successful in AF, but would have really demonized us in the rest of the Islamic Countries.

              Fuck 'em.

              The mongols knew how to deal with those assholes.

          2. Timon 19   12 years ago

            John, you do understand that Arabs and Afghans are pretty much completely different, right?

            1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

              What makes you think that he doesn't realize that.

              OBL was an Arab asshole not from any ethnic group native to Afghanistan.

  2. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Microsoft acknowledged a "very small number" of customers purchased Xbox Ones with serious disc reading issues. No blue screens reported.

    See, if Microsoft has rollout problems why can't Obamacare? //befuddle prog

  3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    A Texas man has been in prison for more than 30 years despite having his conviction overturned and a new trial ordered in 1980.

    First you complain because his trial was too speedy, now you complain it isn't speedy enough. Make up your minds!

    1. John   12 years ago

      It is a very interesting story. Too bad Reason couldn't link to a news story about it or at least a court document.

      1. RBS   12 years ago

        Here

        1. Zeb   12 years ago

          That's just fucked up. Just let him out. Even if he is guilty, he already has done his time.

          1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

            It sounds like a law-school hypothetical come to life.

            He was charged with capital murder and the jury sentenced him to death. The Court of Criminal Appeal, in 1980, found that a juror had wrongly been excluded because of scruples about capital punishment. In such a case, according to the *Witherspoon* precedent, the jury has been unfairly stacked in favor of the death penalty, BUT it can still be relied on to give a fair verdict on guilt or innocence. BUT, the state's rules of criminal procedure provided only one remedy if the jury improperly imposed the death penalty, and that remedy was a new trial. SO, the appeals court issued a mandate ordering a new trial.

            Right after that, the governor of Texas issued a proclamation purporting to change the death sentence to life in prison. The guy has been in prison under that proclamation to this day.

            Now, if the governor had acted sooner, before the appeals court issued its mandate, there would have been no problem. Since the only problem with the trial was with the death penalty, not with the underlying conviction, a commutation of the sentence would have solved the problem.

            BUT - the governor waited too long. By the time he issued the proclamation the court had vacated the conviction and sentence, and there was no sentence to commute! (The Texas governor can only commute sentences *after* conviction). So his proclamation was meaningless, and there ought to have been a new trial. But there wasn't.

            1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

              So the legal situation is that a person has been charged with a capital crime but not convicted - since the earlier conviction was vacated - and has waited for trial for three decades.

              It's a speedy-trial violation, and the remedy is to drop all charges. The prosecution has to fish or cut bait.

              They weren't *trying* to deny a speedy trial - they thought the governor's proclamation gave him a life sentence for a murder for which a fair jury had found him guilty. But for procedural reasons, the authorities were wrong.

              Releasing this fellow is part of the price of the rule of law.

              1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

                You know who ought to be *really* pissed? The victim's relatives. Because the prosecution couldn't be bothered to follow proper procedures, a guilty murderer could well be released.

                1. Michael Ejercito   12 years ago

                  This is why following criminal procedure is so important.

  4. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    This dog can stack anything on its head

    1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

      That's the most pleasant thing I've seen around here in a long while. Thanks for the chuckles!

    2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      We're going to find out its owner is a taxidermist.

      1. Dweebston   12 years ago

        That's the least pleasant thing I've seen around here this afternoon. Thanks!

        1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

          That's what I'm here for.

    3. MJGreen   12 years ago

      I don't know if I could stack bacon on my head. That dog's a pro.

  5. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

    Microsoft acknowledged a "very small number" of customers purchased Xbox Ones with serious disc reading issues. No blue screens reported.

    But are there red rings?

  6. Caleb Turberville   12 years ago

    http://tinyurl.com/ky8alow

    I brought this up in an earlier thread. I think what I like most is the ignorance about the concept of "investment."

  7. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Enrollment through Colorado's insurance exchange is barely half the projected worst case scenario...

    Fire the person who set the worst case scenario bar so high! Or not high enough. Whichever.

    1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

      James Cameron?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        Spoiler alert: It was Clinton who lowered the bar. Cameron raised it.

  8. Long Range Boredom   12 years ago

    Libertarians fiddle while Rome burns, says Objective Standard.

    Can't we all just get along?

    1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

      Going after Tibor is a bit harsh.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      With Objectivists? They hate people more than libertarians. But anyone who starts from pre-Hobbesian ideas that there is nothing inherent in each human that belongs solely to him or her and cannot be stolen or sold (like this Mr. Brad Taylor) is never going to be able to have a discussion with me. They have already decided that force is the only thing that matters and that they hope they can toady to those with the force enough to enjoy some scraps from the table.

    3. Corning   12 years ago

      Suppose your city were on fire, buildings were ablaze, people were stuck in the buildings, and time was running out. And suppose the firefighters got busy?not manning fire trucks, fire hoses, and ladders?but inconclusively debating whether such tools exist. This, in effect, is what libertarians are doing as the Land of Liberty burns.

      Yeah cuz libertarians have all the say in the world how the fire dept is run. Give me a fucking break.

      If a libertarian picked up water bucket he would immediately be arrested for violating storm water regulations and the clean water act.

      1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

        Wooo, that's a good story there Corning.

        1. Corning   12 years ago

          Don't get all serious in the PM Links now.

      2. MJGreen   12 years ago

        The inconclusive debate would be about whether the fire hoses shoot out water or gasoline. Seems like a pretty important discussion to have before manning the hoses.

  9. Brett L   12 years ago

    Libertarians like Paul Ryan and The Economist are going soft according to The Atlantic

    1. John   12 years ago

      That is the most incoherent article I have read in a while. WTF does Paul Ryan, someone who doesn't even claim to be a libertarian, supporting anti-poverty programs have to do with helmet laws in Texas? It reads like that investment house commercial where they tell you how wool prices in New Zealand affect the Chinese auto industry.

      1. Brett L   12 years ago

        He's a fan of Ayn Rand so therefore, libertarians are wrong! As best I could tell. And the idea that the Eurocrat-toadying Economist is remotely libertarian made me laugh out loud.

    2. Certified Public Asskicker   12 years ago

      The Economist must have recently found religion?why else would it suddenly report that libertarianism can go too far and that rights may be bent to help the common good?

      I think I missed something.

      1. robc   12 years ago

        Someone doesnt know what the word "right" means.

    3. Jordan   12 years ago

      The Economist has been firmly in the Keynesian/Monetarist Klown Kamp for at least a decade. What a joke.

    4. Medical Physics Guy   12 years ago

      Amatai Etzioni. Anyone remember when he debated David Kelley? That shows my Libertarian Age I guess...

      1. fish   12 years ago

        Mr Communitarian???

        Yeah...anything from him about libertarianism....it must be gospel!

  10. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The U.S. government reportedly turned a larger profit on student loans,$41.3 billion, than all but two companies worldwide, Exxon Mobil and Apple.

    They'll need that money to cover all the defaults.

    1. John   12 years ago

      And isn't making large profits from middle class and poor young people trying to better themselves something leftist tell us is wrong?

    2. The Last American Hero   12 years ago

      Hard not to turn a profit when you can print the capital to lend in the first place.

      1. Certified Public Asskicker   12 years ago

        Yeah, I was going to say to be fair to government incompetence, $41.3 billion seems rather small when you lent over $1 trillion.

  11. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    ...which officials say will make it difficult for the state "to deliver on promises made to Colorado citizens" and jeopardize the program's revenue stream.

    If you like your solvency you can keep it.

  12. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    61 year old Marine veteran saves woman who jumped from Oakland Coliseum deck

    A woman was clinging to life after jumping from the third deck of the Coliseum following Sunday's Raiders game, authorities said.

    But her life, as of late Sunday, appears to have been saved by a good Samaritan who pleaded with her not to jump and broke her 45-foot fall when she did...

    "He saved her life quite honestly, at his own expense," Nelson said outside the Coliseum on Sunday night. "This guy 100 percent saved her life. She'd be dead now."

    The tense, brief standoff began around 4:30 p.m., 15 minutes after the end of the game in which Oakland lost 23-19 to the Tennessee Titans, authorities said.

    The 61-year-old Stockton man, a Marine Corps veteran, was on the second deck concourse level when he noticed the woman above, and repeatedly shouted, "don't do it," Nelson said.

    But she jumped to the concourse below. The woman, who has not been identified, was taken to the hospital with critical injuries. She had gone to the west upper deck seating area in a section covered by a tarp, police said, and it appeared she was alone before she jumped.

    The injured man was taken to the hospital with serious injuries, but was conscious and talking and is expected to survive, police said.

    Even in suicide Raider fans are inconsiderate.

    1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      Even in suicide Raider fans are inconsiderate.

      Are we even a tiny bit surprised?

      1. mrvco   12 years ago

        Talk about inconsiderate, apparently he didn't bother to ask whether she had a good reason to jump or not.

    2. Brett L   12 years ago

      Protip: Do not attempt to catch your own weight at approximately 2g. I mean, kudos to the guy for being pro-life, holy shit.

  13. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

    Theory: Miley Cyrus is actually a brilliant Dadaist performance artist.

    Discuss.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      I put this forward a couple of weeks ago.

      1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        Then I defer to your earlier wisdom on the topic.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          I don't know. I liked SF's proposition that first you take all the "fuck you, dad!" money, then you move on to the concerned twink money. I assume after that you reconcile with your original audience and make mom-pop.

    2. John   12 years ago

      Either that or she is a no talent former child actor who is willing to do anything to stay famous after she can no longer play a child?

    3. Almanian!   12 years ago

      no

      1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

        THIS

      2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        She's making absurdist anti-art for the sake of critiquing pop culture and is in the process trolling America. How is what she's doing different than Duchamp's "Fountain"?

        The kitten WEEPS during the performance.

        1. Zeb   12 years ago

          Duchamp did it on purpose. And had the talent to make whatever kind of art he wanted to.

          1. The Hyperbole   12 years ago

            Bullshit, Duchamp did it as a big fuck you to an art world that didn't embrace his painting, then instead of having the integrity to stand by his 'fuck you' and washing his hands of the whole thing, he played to the suddenly adoring art world and ate it up like the unprincipled hack he was.

          2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            That rather assumes that Cyrus isn't doing it on purpose. Did you watch the video? There's a weeping CGI kitten floating through space lipsyncing with her. Her outfit is completely awful. The terribleness MUST be intentional.

            1. GILMORE   12 years ago

              This is the Gay You putting a kitchy spin on what is in reality something drowning in a sea of its own existential awfulness.

              Which can indeed be amusing in small doses. This is where some exposure to the Church of the Subgenius really pays off. The terribleness of EVERYTHING becomes far more entertaining.

              Which reminds me... I sent them a check for something... and can't remember what...

              oh well. Hey have you ever seen Whats Up Tiger Lilly? Its on YouTube.

              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLU_-YMPX7I

            2. GILMORE   12 years ago

              Also, I havent' seen what the fuck you're talking about

              1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                This is the Gay You putting a kitchy spin on what is in reality something drowning in a sea of its own existential awfulness.

                Shouldn't gay me be obsessing about her outfit?

                Also, I havent' seen what the fuck you're talking about

                The kitten WEEPS, GILMORE. Do not deny yourself the pleasure.

                1. Slumbrew   12 years ago

                  "This video has been removed by the user"

                  1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                    Catch it before someone pulls this one!

                    Or just search for "Miley Cyrus american music awards 2013"

                    1. Slumbrew   12 years ago

                      Wow. That's like something from 'Robocop' (the original, obviously). Occam's razor still favors "do anything for attention" over "sly performance art".

                    2. Slumbrew   12 years ago

                      Also: Miley, being young and not-fat is not the same thing as attractive.

            3. Lady Bertrum   12 years ago

              Have you seen the Kanye West video? I has to be parody. No one is that tasteless, vulgar and insipid. No one.

              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBAtAM7vtgc

              1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                Wait, THIS Kanye west could make something that tasteless, vulgar and insipid?

                Apparently Mr. West interrupted a recent performance to go on a tirade about how the fashion world is snobby against him. I only know this because the local radio stations all break for celebrity news for 10 of the 20 minutes of my drive to work.

                1. Lady Bertrum   12 years ago

                  These two performances were foretold by the Mayans. They signal peak retard-apocalypse. Watching the videos consecutively immediately lowers your IQ by 30 points.

                  1. Slumbrew   12 years ago

                    I haven't gotten around to watching 'Idiocracy' - I clearly need to make some time to do so, since Mike Judge must have some sort of news feed from the future.

  14. Archduke von Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Worlds worst neighbors.

    1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      Fox News: Pantsfan on front lines of liberal War on Christmas.

    2. Bobarian   12 years ago

      Don't they celebrate the winter solstice in June down there?

  15. IDPNDNT   12 years ago

    State police in New York have acquired 32 SUVs so that troopers can more easily peer into cars to catch drivers who are texting.

    If i'm not mistaken don't texting crackdowns simply push people to text in their lap? So now instead of being simply distracted they're not seeing the road at all.

    1. PD Scott   12 years ago

      To be fair, the cops will also be making sure you don't put more than 7 rounds into a magazine.

    2. Game of Gnomes   12 years ago

      In CA the fine for driving solo in the HOV lane is $471. The fine for texting while driving in $117. It made me chuckle a little when I noticed that this weekend.

  16. Rasilio   12 years ago

    If that alt text is supposed to be a double entendre implying the woman pictured is sexually desirable it fails miserably

    1. Generic Stranger   12 years ago

      The angle is a bit weird, but aside from the fact that she's smoking a cigarette she doesn't look half bad.

      1. Rasilio   12 years ago

        No not half bad. It's not like she's ugly or anything (well other than the cigarette which automatically costs any woman at least 2 points on the 1 - 10 scale, nothing worse than going down on a smoker, it's like licking an ashtray) but she is basically completely unremarkable looking.

        1. Art Vandelay   12 years ago

          WE DEMAND LOBSTER GIRL!

        2. Zeb   12 years ago

          You have clearly never licked an ashtray if you are making that comparison.

          It's funny how those perceptions work though. For me, the cigarette adds a point or two.

          1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

            Same here. I also like girls with tattoos.

            And Rasilio, I think you're doing it wrong.

            1. Bobarian   12 years ago

              Are you sure your licking the right hole?

              1. Rasilio   12 years ago

                Yeah, cigarette smoke makes your skin taste like an ashtray, all of it so it wouldn't really matter where I was licking

                1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

                  Yeah, cigarette smoke makes your skin taste like an ashtray,

                  Yeah, no it doesn't.

        3. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

          They aren't supposed to be smoking them with their vaginas.

          1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

            You've never been to Thailand, I take it?

            1. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

              Heh, several times. The first time I walked through Patpong was when I was 10 or so. My parents were incredibly strange about such things, no rated R movies till I was older but walking through a red light district with topless strippers and hookers lining the walkway, now that's just getting some culture.

        4. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

          nothing worse than going down on a smoker, it's like licking an ashtray

          What are you, twelve? "licking an ashtray" is something 14-year-old indoctrinates of public school say.

          1. Rasilio   12 years ago

            Um, that wasn't some sort of euphamism.

            I literally mean it tastes like licking an ashtray.

            My ex wife used to smoke even though she told me she didn't before we got together. Every now and then she'd start smoking at work and she could never get away with it because even of she showered and used mouthwash before she came to bed I could taste the smoke on her.

            She finally quit when I told her I was not going down on her again if she didn't

            1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

              Even if she showered? Bullshit.

              1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                I think there's more at play here. I've dated guys who could chain smoke for an hour and you'd barely smell it on them and guys that could smoke earlier in the day, shower and change and they still had that smoker smell. Maybe it's a personal biochemistry thing?

                1. Slumbrew   12 years ago

                  ^^ This. ^^ Amazing how different people's body chemistry can be. It was a minor revelation, when I was younger, how the same cologne could smell differently on two different people.

                  1. Slumbrew   12 years ago

                    And now I'm giggling about this

                    1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                      And now I'm giggling about this

                      I just passed that to my medical report editing staff. They are openly guffawing, which will probably get me in trouble.

                    2. Slumbrew   12 years ago

                      "I love it when a hot guy passes by me and leaves his colon smell"

                    3. Slumbrew   12 years ago

                      g'damn squirrels - "I get yelled at for that"

                    4. Slumbrew   12 years ago

                      ohhh, topical: "your colon would smell amazing if you werent wearing the overwhelming scent of cigarettes too"

                    5. paranoid android   12 years ago

                      I'll have to take your word for it about the smell of that colon.

            2. paranoid android   12 years ago

              ...even of she showered and used mouthwash before she came to bed I could taste the smoke on her.

              She finally quit when I told her I was not going down on her again if she didn't

              Either you are confused about what "going down" means, or your wife is confused about what "mouthwash" is for.

          2. MJGreen   12 years ago

            And her breasts felt like bags of sand.

        5. SusanM   12 years ago

          My goodness, what was she smoking them with?

  17. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    An Occurrence at Progtard Bridge

    The latest polls on Obamacare are bleak. A Kaiser Family Foundation survey found that almost half of those questioned last week had an unfavorable opinion of the law. Just a third had a favorable opinion, even less than the 40 percent support for the law in the Nov. 14 Gallup poll.

    But those poll numbers will change as more people like Bob Freukes of St. Louis and Donna Smith of Denver are finally able to shop for coverage on the new health insurance websites -- and find coverage that is surprisingly affordable.

    Considering all the negative stories about the malfunctioning HealthCare.gov website and policy cancellations folks have been receiving, the steep decline in support for Obamacare shouldn't surprise anyone.

    How do we know those quotes they get online are accurate?

    As happy as she was to discover she will soon have affordable coverage -- and that it can't be canceled if her cancer returns, thanks to Obamacare -- she still believes a single-payer, Medicare-for-all type system would be better.

    She has a point. The Affordable Care Act is far from perfect. But in the coming months and years, millions of us who have been unable to find affordable coverage will at long last be insured. Poll numbers will eventually reflect that.

    So we're just going to ignore the substantial number of losers in favor of the subsidized?

    1. John   12 years ago

      But in the coming months and years, millions of us who have been unable to find affordable coverage will at long last be insured. Poll numbers will eventually reflect that.

      This is where the lies they have told themselves are finally going to catch up to them. They actually believe that there were millions of people in America who couldn't get health care and hated the system. The reality is that most people were happy with their health coverage. There won't be millions of examples like this. There will be a few thousand if that. And whatever the number, it will be dwarfed by the number of people who will lose coverage they liked. Meanwhile Progs will continue to tell themselves and the country how great this thing is. So instead of throwing Obama and his plan under the bus and saying "we told you we needed single payer", they will die on this hill. Couldn't happen to a better bunch.

      1. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

        I do not think so John. The entire point of redistributionist measures is to redistribute. Some people will get something out of the ACA, others will lose. I think the problem for the Democrat Party is that the former group already consistently voted Democrat and the second group is needed to win elections outside the bluest of states. Barring an Akin-esque 'rape' comment or Steve King like insult to a major demographic group I think the Democrats have lost the White House for a while.

        1. John   12 years ago

          Sure it is. But that is not what they have been doing up until now. Until now most liberal programs have benefited the middle class. And to the extent they haven't, the costs have been hidden in the form of fungible taxes or debt. Never before have people actually seen their lives get worse to pay for someone else getting something. People are not altruistic. If they were, socialism would work.

          The Dems are doomed on this. Everyone loves helping the less fortunate just as long as they think they are doing it with someone else' money.

        2. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

          I do not think so John. The entire point of redistributionist measures is to redistribute.

          Sure, but you and a lot of libertarians and conservatives forget, or miss, that redistribution is only the sweetener to what progs really want --- central planning.

          And sooner or later, the former will give way to the latter and Obamacare is that point for a majority of the people in the country.

          Pretty much everybody will take free shit that's offered to them. Doesn't mean that they're going to accept busybody nannies in exchange.

    2. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

      But in the coming months and years, millions of us who have been unable to find affordable coverage will at long last be insured. Poll numbers will eventually reflect that.

      Millions are now covered, and the costs just went up greatly for hundreds of millions who are paying for it. You're damn right poll numbers will reflect that.

  18. Brett L   12 years ago

    Well, my CRM implementation went live today and handled 6 concurrent users. Would probably have handled a 7th if there were any. So, we've technically had a more successful integration go-live than healthcare.gov

    1. Bam!   12 years ago

      Last time the government's CRM discriminator malfunctioned, we nuked Russia.

    2. flye   12 years ago

      Congrats. And smart move doing a go-live on Thanksgiving Monday -- this is a good week for that sort of thing.

    3. db   12 years ago

      CRM114?

  19. Bo Cara Esq.   12 years ago

    Catholic Manchester Diocese Statement Against Expanded Legalized Gambling in New Hampshire (Bingo Presumed Still OK!)

    -Several bills introduced in the New Hampshire Legislature this session would legalize casinos and permit the use of "video lottery machines" (otherwise known as "slot machines"). Although the Roman Catholic Church does not view gambling as morally unacceptable in and of itself, games of chance "become morally unacceptable when they deprive someone of what is necessary to provide for his needs and those of others. The passion for gambling risks becoming an enslavement (CCC, 2413)." Unfortunately, those expanded gambling bills would, if they pass, have terrible social implications and would harm our New Hampshire way of life.

    http://www.catholicnh.org/publ...../gambling/

    1. Restoras   12 years ago

      I think it just terrifies them that what is left of thier flock will spend their tithe at a casino.

      1. Zeb   12 years ago

        And their bingo money too.

        It's in the Bible: "thou shalt not horn in on thy neighbors racket".

    2. Bam!   12 years ago

      They're worried it'll take away revenue from the Church's casino night.

      1. Bobarian   12 years ago

        To be fair if you go to the casino you have a small but significant chance of winning, which could lead to addiction.

        When the church does it, the only winner is the house.

    3. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

      Yes, how dare a diocese of the Catholic Church point out unintended negative consequences of a proposed government policy!

      I also noted how you disingeniously negelected to include this paragraph of the statement, you know, the one that puts the previous statement in context

      The reality is that if the gambling industry is allowed to expand in New Hampshire, it is unlikely that the state has any reasonable way to address human behavior that moves beyond intended recreational activity. Likewise, as has been seen in many other instances, when states become dependent on revenues associated with gambling, an undesirable dependency by the state can mirror the horrible addictive behavior of persons who gamble without consideration of their basic human needs.

      Note: I live in Manchester and I am currently typing this under duress. The Tribunus Scantae Officii Inquisitionis Novae Hantoniae are holding my family hos....

      1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        I don't think this is a case of the Church protecting its bingo games. They've signed on to a campaign by the anti-gambling coalition, and I hypothesize they did it because of pastoral experience of members of the flock (including heads of households) ruining not only themselves but their families to satisfy addictive behavior.

        It's one thing to say that these sorts of consequences are the price to pay for freedom in Libertopia, but jokes about "lol they want to protect their bingo lol" are utterly ridiculous.

        1. paranoid android   12 years ago

          It's one thing to say that these sorts of consequences are the price to pay for freedom in Libertopia, but jokes about "lol they want to protect their bingo lol" are utterly ridiculous.

          And it just won't do to have jokes that are ridiculous! No, jokes are meant to be serious business.

          1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

            As I understand it, the sentiment behind the jokes is that "they can't *really* have a genuine concern about gambling addicts among their flock, and in the general public - they must have some kind of angle."

            1. paranoid android   12 years ago

              ...and? Posters here--pretty much all of us--routinely accuse politicians of arguing in bad faith and using concern for such things as "the poor" and "the planet" as covers for increasing their own power--"having an angle" as you might put it.

              If characterizing activists and politicians is acceptable, why can't that same attitude be directed towards what has historically been one of the most corrupt and oppressive organizations ever founded, the Catholic Church?

              1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

                "If characterizing activists and politicians is acceptable"

                That would depend on whether the characterization is accurate.

                So...is it accurate to say the Diocese of New Hampshire only wants the money of gambling addicts?

                1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

                  Diocese of Manchester

                2. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                  The larger point, that Bo misses, or chose not to acknowledge, is that what the Diocese is actually saying is that if the the State of NH plans on making revenue by gambling, it should also be prepared to have the social services in place to deal with the fallout from gambling addicts. So while, in the short run, gambling may seem to increase revenue, those profits will be lost by the increasing burden to the welfare state.

                  1. paranoid android   12 years ago

                    And that is a reasonable point, in marked contrast with Eduard's "how dare he!" huffery.

                    1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

                      I'll repeat:

                      "So...is it accurate to say the Diocese of New Hampshire only wants the money of gambling addicts?"

                    2. paranoid android   12 years ago

                      Why should I defend a statement that was not made directly or indirectly by any party to this conversation?

                    3. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

                      "I think it just terrifies them that what is left of thier [sic] flock will spend their tithe at a casino."

                      "And their bingo money too."

                      "It's in the Bible: "thou shalt not horn in on thy neighbors racket"."

                      "They're worried it'll take away revenue from the Church's casino night."

                    4. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                      I try.

  20. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

    Nut Consumption Reduces Risk of Death

    The regular nut-eaters were found to be more slender than those who didn't eat nuts, a finding that should alleviate fears that eating a lot of nuts will lead to overweight.

    1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

      So, you're good then?

    2. Rasilio   12 years ago

      "eating a lot of nuts will lead"

      I shall have to tell my wife this

    3. Medical Physics Guy   12 years ago

      I was just chatting about this. A couple of radiologists told me a few months ago that my love for peanut butter is going to give me liver cancer by the time I turn 60. So who's right?

      1. Restoras   12 years ago

        Are peanuts technically nuts?

        1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

          Legumes!

          1. Medical Physics Guy   12 years ago

            I thought it was cashews that weren't really nuts. Maybe it's both.

            1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

              Beans, lentils, peas, and peanuts. Cashews are nuts.

            2. Zeb   12 years ago

              Depends on how technical you want to get. Peanuts are definitely not nuts. Nuts grow on trees.

        2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

          FTA: Whether any specific type or types of nuts were crucial to the protective effect could not be determined. However, the reduction in mortality was similar both for peanuts (a legume, or ground nut) and for tree nuts ? walnuts, hazelnuts, almonds, Brazil nuts, cashews, macadamias, pecans, pistachios, and pine nuts.

        3. The Bearded Hobbit   12 years ago

          A more accurate name would be "nutpeas".

          I have to laugh when someone says they have a "peanut allergy" then shies away from a real nut like a vampire avoids daylight.

          ... Hobbit

          1. BigT   12 years ago

            I know seven people with peanut allergy, including 3 members of my immediate family. All but one are also severely allergic to walnuts, cashews, etc. according to tests and bad experiences; including trips to the hospital. So I would not laugh, lest you be the cause of an untimely death. Urge caution, and confirming tests. And keep an Epi-pen at hand.

      2. PD Scott   12 years ago

        According to this, it depends on your peanut butter.

        FTA:The bottom line when it comes to peanut butter and your health: Buy organic to prevent pesticide contamination. Refrigerate your jar to prevent fungal growth. And if you're particularly concerned about aflatoxins, buy from top-notch natural brands like Arrowhead Mills, which claim to be completely aflatoxin-free.

        1. Medical Physics Guy   12 years ago

          Thanks. This is my brand so maybe I am ok. I have definitely been concerned.

        2. Sevo   12 years ago

          "Buy organic to prevent pesticide contamination."

          Is this to get the manure contamination?

          1. seguin   12 years ago

            Or pest contamination.

  21. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Krugman: California proves Obamacare will work nationwide

    At a time like this, you really want a controlled experiment. What would happen if we unveiled a program that looked like Obamacare, in a place that looked like America, but with competent project management that produced a working website?

    ...Ladies and gentlemen, I give you California.

    This should be good.

    California is, however, an especially useful test case. First of all, it's huge: if a system can work for 38 million people, it can work for America as a whole.

    Flawless logic from the professor.

    Enrollment is surging. At this point, more than 10,000 applications are being completed per day, putting the state well on track to meet its overall targets for 2014 coverage. Just imagine, by the way, how different press coverage would be right now if Obama officials had produced a comparable success, and around 100,000 people a day were signing up nationwide.

    Yeah, just imagine if the Federal government was competent.

    To work as planned, health reform has to produce a balanced risk pool ? that is, it must sign up young, healthy Americans as well as their older, less healthy compatriots. And so far, so good: in October, 22.5 percent of California enrollees were between the ages of 18 and 34, slightly above that group's share of the population.

    Need more self-sacrifice!

    1. Almanian!   12 years ago

      Too bad austerity-sequester-nuclear option-Rethuglitransigence will kill ANY chance of this working nationally.

      /Krugnuts

    2. Certified Public Asskicker   12 years ago

      What is most shocking is someone has overtaken Krugman in being first to take a punch to the face:

      From the comments:

      So like most Californians that support Obamacare I am optimistic about its future, at least in my state. It's hard to resist that feeling of smugness that I know can be highly irritating to non-Californians. Sorry:)

    3. paranoid android   12 years ago

      Sometimes, I really just don't get Krugman's deal. He's a decent writer (in form, if not in content), and he is obviously knowledgeable about some things, so I really can't believe that he's just an idiot who doesn't know any better when he writes something like this:

      To work as planned, health reform has to produce a balanced risk pool ? that is, it must sign up young, healthy Americans as well as their older, less healthy compatriots. And so far, so good: in October, 22.5 percent of California enrollees were between the ages of 18 and 34, slightly above that group's share of the population.

      It takes about five seconds of thinking that through to realize it doesn't make any sense since the exchange wasn't designed to attract enrollees whose demographics would match those of the total state--the very young and very old were already covered by Medicaid and Medicare, meaning that by design those groups will be underrepresented in the exchange relative to their share of the general population. Krugman's statement is just meaningless, in that it doesn't provide any actual, useful information about the performance of the exchange, only serious-sounding numbers glossed with Krugman's appeal to his own authority as an expert on everything.

      I could see Yglesias writing something like that and just not knowing any better, but with Krugman, I don't buy it. I feel he could make arguments that weren't so totally shitty if he tried, so why doesn't he?

      1. Medical Physics Guy   12 years ago

        I keep waiting for Krugman's Joseph Welch moment. But it never comes.

        1. John   12 years ago

          Krugman really is a performance artist. He clearly understands that pretty much everything he writes is bullshit. I think he likes the attention and rationalizes lying so much by thinking that he is telling a noble lie that shows a truth only top men like himself can understand.

          1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

            I'm not so sure. I think it's just partisan blindness.

            1. John   12 years ago

              Read his book "Peddling Prosperity" sometime. He wrote it in the late 1980s and it is an equal take down of both Keynsian and supply side economics. He knows better. I think he thinks he is telling a noble lie.

              1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

                But for it to be a noble lie, he has to believe that his Keynesian/Yellow Dog Democrat shtick is truly effective in achieving in reaching that noble goal. I think he may have just changed his mind, probably partly from the social pressure of his environment, and partly because he was so traumatized by Bush v. Gore.

    4. Bobarian   12 years ago

      "in a place that looked like America..."

      California does not look like America, so fail #1.

    5. Slumbrew   12 years ago

      I thought we already had a "controlled experiment" - Romneycare. So we should totally not be opposed to Obamacare, since Romneycare already showed... something. The fact costs immediately ballooned far past expectations are are expected to continue to grow is, like, an irrelevant part of that experiment.

  22. John   12 years ago

    http://nhjournal.com/2013/11/2.....e-imagery/

    New Hampshire Dems keep it classy. Remember sexist language and inferring that a woman is stupid because she is physically attractive is totally not sexist when liberals do it.

    1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

      They're doing it ironically, so, you know, it's cool, man.

    2. Almanian!   12 years ago

      Sarah Palin, LOL!

      /libtard

    3. John   12 years ago

      And Marilinda Garcia is a babe.

      http://www.nhcornerstone.org/w.....arcia.jpeg

      1. Rasilio   12 years ago

        Hell yeah, that's what I call Smokin

        1. John   12 years ago

          She is smoking. And she has such a nice smile. She looks like a nice person in addition to being smoking. The people of New Hampshire owe it to America to keep her in public life.

          1. Zeb   12 years ago

            Well, if she runs in that race against Kuster, I'll have an opportunity to vote for her. I know almost nothing about her at this point, though.

            1. John   12 years ago

              What do you need to know besides that face and that body? How much damage can one House member do anyway?

              1. Zeb   12 years ago

                Yeah, it's probably worth the vote just to get a looker in there. If we are going to have an all female congressional delegation, we really should have at least one hot one.

                1. John   12 years ago

                  And it is not like there is any chance of her opponent being a decent choice or anything.

              2. fish   12 years ago

                What do you need to know besides that face and that body? How much damage can one House member do anyway?

                TWO WORDS: Nancy Pelosi

            2. JW   12 years ago

              She's almost as hot as Rose DeLaurio.

          2. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

            Unfortunately, I'm not in her district.

            She got a good write-up by the NH Republican Liberty Caucus, if that means anything.

    4. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

      It should also be noted that Peter Sullivan is a reverse-carpetbagger from Virgina.

      So, we'll just have to take this one on the chin, for now. But no others!

      1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        Carpetbagging is the American tradition. You move somewhere because you think the new place is better than the old place. That's flattering, and might get you some votes.

  23. PD Scott   12 years ago

    You might either think, "hmm, that could be good" or want to shower with Lysol: exhibit features cheese made from human sourced bacteria

    http://www.gizmag.com/selfmade-cheese.....ria/29879/

    Dubbed Selfmade, the cheese in question is made from human bacteria which derives from samples taken from people's armpits, toes, and noses. Each Selfmade cheese is created from cultures taken from the skin of a different person, and the process involves a strange combination of food preparation and microbiological techniques. This results in signature cheeses which are unique to each person ? such as a "Christina" cheese, and "Ben" cheese, for example.

    1. Generic Stranger   12 years ago

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJXYMDu6dpY

      1. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

        Why? Does it really matter where the bacteria comes from?

        1. robc   12 years ago

          I bet he doesnt drink lambics either.

          Where did the yeast and bacteria come from?

          Who knows!

          1. Generic Stranger   12 years ago

            I don't drink beer, period; doesn't matter how it's made. Can't stand the taste. I prefer rum or whisky.

            In this case, I wouldn't eat it specifically because I do know where the bacteria came from...

        2. Rasilio   12 years ago

          realistically it shouldn't, what should matter is the taste. The problem is most people never really think about the fact that cheese is basically made with bacteria and this kinda rubs it in their faces.

          That said if you could get people over the ick factor you could make a mint by partnering with celebrities and making a line of cheeses based of their personal bacteria with the price of the cheese being related to the marketability of the celebrity.

          1. Generic Stranger   12 years ago

            Hey, sewer rat may taste like pumpkin pie, but I'd never know 'cause I wouldn't eat the filthy motherfucker.

            Same with this stuff...

          2. PapayaSF   12 years ago

            Oh yeah, who wouldn't want some Miley Cyrus Cheese? Or Lindsay Lohan Cheese? Or Angelina Jolie Cheese?

    2. robc   12 years ago

      Rogue fermented a beer with yeast recovered from one of their brewer's beards.

    3. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

      If I were in possession of my foreskin, intact in its natural habit, I would harvest the bacteria from my dick-cheese to make dick-cheese.

      1. Slumbrew   12 years ago

        fromunder cheese is still within your reach

  24. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    The Southern Avenger speaks

    But let's be honest: My commentary wasn't all that different from what more mainstream conservatives were saying?at the time and still today.

    Look at some of the popular conservative arguments of the last decade. Is our border-security problem really part of a La Raza takeover of the United States, as some have speculated? As I once speculated?
    President Obama is unquestionably awful. But is it necessary to call him a food-stamp president? What kind of message does that send?
    Do we need to portray Obama as a secret Kenyan-Muslim-communist consumed by anti-colonial rage? Would his policies be more acceptable if Obamacare and gun control were somehow proven to be all-American in origin?

    I believe that conservatives' limited-government arguments are the right ones. So why do we ever have to go there?

    Most conservatives are not, and never were, racists. But many have displayed a disregard for minorities for a very long time and in a plethora of ways. I certainly did. Minorities think we don't like them. Not enough conservatives have tried to convince them that's not true. Some seem comfortable doubling down on the same old insensitivities as a matter of being more right wing-than-thou.
    It's a problem. It's also a dead end for the GOP.

    1. John   12 years ago

      So let me guess, your radio show hit the skids you have now decided to make your career as a reformed conservative concern troll.

      1. Medical Physics Guy   12 years ago

        Coming soon, the Hunterton Post

  25. Dweebston   12 years ago

    Albuquerque district court judge declares city's vehicle seizure policy in DWI cases unconstitutional.

    It's a few days old, so h&r may have covered it already, but it's nice seeing fairly pleasant news about New Mexico from time to time.

    1. Dweebston   12 years ago

      Fuck it. http://www.abqjournal.com/3073.....tures.html

  26. Dweebston   12 years ago

    Sf'd link.

    1. John   12 years ago

      Double SF.

      1. SugarFree   12 years ago

        Never go double SF.

        1. Dweebston   12 years ago

          You all may use your parlance if you like, but to me the term is indelibly skullfucked .

          1. Bobarian   12 years ago

            That is exactly what it is.

            SugarFree is just a euphemism.

            A riddle, wrapped in an enigma, dipped in saccharin and Warty juice.

            1. fish   12 years ago

              A riddle, wrapped in an enigma, dipped in saccharin and Warty juice.

              Wonder how cheese made from that would taste?

          2. SugarFree   12 years ago

            It all works, really.

  27. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

    The American Lung Association and the American Cancer Society, both supporters of the Affordable Care Act, nevertheless oppose Obamacare's tobacco surcharge, arguing it will push smokers out of insurance policies and make it even more difficult for them to quit.

    Huh?

    1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

      Insurance companies offer smoking cessation programs, which you can't be in if you're not insured.

  28. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Dear Prudence: Help! My wife hid her right-wing religious beliefs from me

    I dated my wife for three years before we married. We were both in our 30s and had had all of the important discussions before we decided to marry (kids, religion, etc.). At the time, she told me she was agnostic, and not really into "the whole religion thing." Now, less than six months into our marriage, she tells me she's joined a church and expects me to join her for Sunday services. It's only now that I learn that she has extremely right-wing, religious views. After talking with some of her friends, they couldn't believe I didn't know this about her. I asked them why they wouldn't have mentioned this when they found out we weren't having a church wedding and they told me that was probably done for my benefit. Now, instead of our not wanting any kids, she wants at least five and maybe more. Instead of no religion, she wants strict adherence to her religion. I feel I've been duped and that she's lied to me about herself. Is there any way out of this short of divorce?

    I like how, for once, Prudie says this must be a prank letter because no one could be that dumb, right?

    1. John   12 years ago

      What are "right wing" versus "left wing" religious views? I bet anything if she were going to the "First Church of Christ and Social Justice" dumb ass would be studying to be a deacon.

      1. Zeb   12 years ago

        I think you answered your own question with "First Church of Christ and Social Justice"

    2. Rasilio   12 years ago

      Assuming it is not a prank why the hell would he WANT to stay married to her?

      I mean if his story is on the up and up she lied to him and misrepresented everything about herself to make her seem more desirable to him and then 6 months after they were married she drops it on him like a bomb?

      If this happened to me there'd be no question of whether or not we got divorced, the only question would be what I had to do to ensure that I would not be on the hook for alimony

      1. John   12 years ago

        I agree. But you have to be pretty stupid not to notice it was a lie. All of her friends knew her views.

        1. tarran   12 years ago

          I assume by right wing religious views, she belongs to a more traditional church. Which probably puts an emphasis on the woman being subservient to her husband... meaning that this sort of deception should violate her religious views and be anathema to her.

          I just don't but this. I guess in a country of 300+ million there should be a couple of instances of any kind of weird two-facedness that a person can conceive of... but I am having trouble with my willing suspension of disbelief.

          Of course, there is a solution:

          Have her join Christian Nymphos!

          1. John   12 years ago

            I think an hour in church once a week could be negotiated in return for the right sexual favors. But something tells me this guy wouldn't find blowjobs and various other sundry acts sufficient for him to have to suffer Republicans or he wouldn't be writing for advice.

          2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            I believe this is called missionary dating. It's seriously frowned on by just about everyone (being "unequally yoked"). I have heard that some smaller culty sects engage in it, but I've never encountered them personally. He could be confusing "right wing" and "completely batshit" sects.

      2. Dweebston   12 years ago

        I wouldn't mind marrying a devoutly religious woman, even as an atheist, with the understanding that I'd not attend regular sermons (I don't mind making exceptions for Easter and Christmas). Also, no to creationism.

      3. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        If its true why not look on the bright side? If right wing means what I think it does, she believes in wives being obediant to their husbands and doing icky womens work like changing diapers. She wont be nagging her tired husband to help with rhe housework. And in exchange his wife gives him multiple children to care for him when hes old. Dude, it could be worse.

    3. Zeb   12 years ago

      First thing, make damn sure you don't get her pregnant.

    4. Corning   12 years ago

      I like how, for once, Prudie says this must be a prank letter because no one could be that dumb, right?

      He was getting laid...lots of things get blurred out when you are getting laid...and they come better into focus after 6 months of the same thing.

      Plus women who are good at lying are not exactly rare.

    5. Tejicano   12 years ago

      If this were me - assuming they were using condoms for birth control - I would tell her that I already had a vasectomy but was using condoms so she wouldn't catch herpes from me. Then I would watch how that news spins her reaction about the upcoming divorce proceedings.

  29. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

    Steve Chapman 2013 on the Democrat's elimination of the filibuster for judicial nominees:

    "There is something to be said for promoting deliberation by impeding action. But that's what the Constitution did, requiring legislation to gain the approval of the House, the Senate and the president. It also required judges to win not only the president's nomination but the approval of a majority of senators

    Under the established filibuster rule, though, a majority of senators often did not have the power to do what the Constitution says?namely, to provide "advice and consent" on presidential nominees. A minority of members could block them from even taking a vote."

    http://reason.com/archives/201.....r#comments

    1. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

      Steve Chapman 2005 on The Republicans attempted elimnation of the filibuster for judicial nominees:

      "Critics of the filibuster, however, say there are limits to Congress' authority over its own deliberations. In their view, rules may not impose a "supermajority" requirement that the Constitution doesn't provide (as it does for treaties and constitutional amendments, which have to pass by a two-thirds vote).

      Nice theory, but where did they find it? Not in the Constitution. The "advice and consent" clause doesn't even say that a majority of senators is needed to confirm a nominee. The definition of "consent" is left to the Senate."

      http://articles.baltimoresun.c.....l-nominees

      "But none of those is as important as the oldest law of politics: Where you stand depends on where you sit."

      Indeed, Mr. Chapman, indeed.

      1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

        Wait, aren't those both anti-filibuster?

        1. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

          The way I read it he says in 2005 article the critics of the filibuster have no constitutional support, the Senate can define what is "advise and consent", The Senate is constitutionally empowered to require 60 votes to end debate on a nominee. So it is against eliminating the filibuster.

          The 2013 is for eliminnating the filibuster.

          The 2013 article says the filibuster is

          1. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

            The 2013 article for eliminating the filibuster.

            1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

              What's the 2005 article in favor of?

          2. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

            The 2005 article is critical of the GOP attempt to eliminate the filibuster.

      2. Jordan   12 years ago

        Nice. Derpman strikes again.

      3. John   12 years ago

        I love kicking around Chapman as much as anyone. But those two articles seem to be consistent.

        1. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

          How is "...a majority of senators often did not have the power to do what the Constitution says..." consistent with "...The "advice and consent" clause doesn't even say that a majority of senators is needed to confirm a nominee."?

  30. Archduke von Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Stay Classy, Winnipeg

  31. GILMORE   12 years ago

    Colorado Obamacare Enrollment Even Worse Than Worst Case Projections

    LOL

    I guess that ruins my, "Deal with Iran Purely an Effort to Temporarily Shut Down Parade of Headlines Declaring Even-Worse-Than-The-Darkest-Nightmare Details of Obamacare Fiasco"-theory

  32. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Star Wars is dead: Dispatches from a Star Wars open casting call

    Here's why Star Wars is dead: First, because they made a huge mistake in not casting me. Second, because it's no longer in the hands of a bunch of nerds in California and because it's been entrusted instead to the kind of people who think eight-hour meet-and-greets are a good idea either as A) publicity stunts (or, giving them the presumption of good faith) B) a good way to determine who's going to be the next Luke Skywalker. It's because Star Wars ? a story that's profoundly anti-centralization, anti-bureaucracy, anti-depersonalization ? is being micromanaged and scrutinized by nameless bureaucrats who think that people who've stood in line for five hours will be satisfied with being directed to a website. And it's because a film enterprise that was initially about risk is now about bet-hedging. No one should need to be told that the seventh film in a franchise probably isn't going to be super great. But, you know, just in case, consider yourself warned.

    As I headed out of auditions, I passed Josh and Kaylyn on the escalator, and I asked him how it went (Kaylyn wasn't trying out; she was just there to support her fianc?).

    "Oh, all right," he said. He looked glum. "Over and done." If only we could say as much for Lucasfilm.

  33. Sevo   12 years ago

    Alt text winner of the day!

  34. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

    Buddha: 100 years old than previously thought.

    I don't expect the Buddhist world will change the reckoning of its calendar, which is currently 2556, but it's possible.

    1. SugarFree   12 years ago

      Buddha, Schmudda.

      Jesus was born at 12:01am January 1, 1 like a proper figure of worship. You can't beat timing like that, hippie.

  35. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Craiglist DC apartment listing: $1 rent for naked roommate

    The landlord decided to rent their Chinatown penthouse for just $1 per month.
    The only catch? The new tenant has to be "very attractive" aged 26 or under and happy to be a "naked roommate," The Daily Dot reports.
    "I'm a male looking for another male (straight or bisexual w/girlfriend preferred, but masc gay is cool too) to be my naked roommate," read the original ad, which has now been removed.
    "Sounds crazy, but this is for real."
    The ad went on to say the arrangement would be mostly "looking," but some "touching" will be required ? the legality of which is murky at best the Huffington Post reported.

    As weird as this is of course it should be legal.

    1. GILMORE   12 years ago

      You need to read Jonathan Ames book, "What's Not to Love?"

      http://www.amazon.com/Whats-No.....0375726497

      Its a collection of his pieces as the 'sex columnist' for the NY Press. There are a dozen stories like this. All hilarious.

      That said = D.C. has a 'Chinatown'? What, the Chinese Government doesn't own the whole place yet?

  36. cavalier973   12 years ago

    Angola bans Islam, begins tearing down mosques.

    1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

      Angola Denies It Banned Islam, Destroyed Mosques

      1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

        Yes, but the damage has been done. Angola is going to be flooded with thousands of shreiking Jihadis seeking martyrdom and vengeance over this perceived slight.

        1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

          At least they didn't draw cartoons or write a novel about Islam. Then they'd REALLY be in trouble.

      2. cavalier973   12 years ago

        Why is this article (by PapayaSF) making me laugh?

        "Angola has banned Islam!" --headline.

        Angola--"Wait, what was that? What did you say just now?"

  37. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    NPR is doing a report on 23andme and the FDA ban on it. So they're interviewing a medical ethicist who defends the FDA, but they didn't seem to have gotten around to interviewing anyone from the company. Maybe I missed it...

  38. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

    NPR (or Marketplace) says the public knew at the time that FDR was disabled. "his disability was discussed constantly, and he was very frank about it." Polio sufferers wrote to him. The March of Dimes used Roosevelt in its fundraising.

    This isn't a pro-FDR point, it's about the mythmaking process and the tendency to denigrate previous generations. Isn't it bad enough they voted for this guy without accusing them of being in denial about obvious facts?

  39. ibcbet   12 years ago

    That was just stuff he said to keep the Republicans from calling him soft. i think that nothing

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Can We End Racism by Ending the Idea of Race Itself?

Rachel Ferguson | From the June 2025 issue

The Supreme Court Said States Can't Discriminate in Alcohol Sales. They're Doing It Anyway.

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 5.24.2025 7:00 AM

Cocaine Hippos, Monkey Copyrights, and a Horse Named Justice: The Debate Over Animal Personhood

C.J. Ciaramella | From the June 2025 issue

Harvard's Best Protection Is To Get Off the Federal Teat

Autumn Billings | 5.23.2025 6:16 PM

Trump's Mass Cancellation of Student Visas Illustrates the Lawlessness of His Immigration Crackdown

Jacob Sullum | 5.23.2025 5:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!