Boeing Workers Reject New Contract over Pensions
Could end up losing a new project in their area over it
A group of Boeing employees soundly rejected a contract offer aimed at keeping assembly work for the company's new 777X near Seattle, setting up a potential economic bonanza for lower-cost states hoping to land the project.
The contract was rejected by 67 percent of voters from the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, which counts about 30,000 workers in the Puget Sound region. "We preserved something sacred by rejecting the Boeing proposal," IAM District 751 President Tom Wroblewski said in a statement. "We've held on to our pensions and that's big. At a time when financial planners are talking about a 'retirement crisis' in America, we have preserved a tool that will help our members retire with more comfort and dignity."
The contract angered many union members because it sought to convert their traditional pension plan to a defined-benefit system, the kind that has become common across corporate America over the past two decades. The eight-year proposal also would offer a one percent wage increase every other year and would have extended the period for workers to reach the top pay scale from six to 16 years.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Once again, a Union votes against continued employment.
"it sought to convert their traditional pension plan to a defined-benefit system..." You (copied from Bloomberg) have that backwards. They wanted to convert it FROM a defined benefit plan to a defined contribution plan.