Baylen Linnekin on a Looming GMO Labeling Compromise


Like it or not, writes Baylen Linnekin, a mandatory, uniform national GMO labeling scheme appears increasingly likely. Under a potential federal compromise, every food product label would have to identify whether or not the food contains GMOs. Testing and labeling costs would be substantial for farmers, producers, and sellers of all sizes. But small farmers and others--including consumers--would feel the brunt of the law.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?