Gwyneth Paltrow Says She's Addicted to Sex

Because of Chelsea Handler

Gwyneth Paltrow has confessed that she is addicted to sex.

The 'Shakespeare In Love' star, who is married to Chris Martin, told chat show host Chelsea Handler that she was a really normal person until she started to hangout with Handler all the time, the Daily Star reported.

Comments

[gaoxiaen]

She can come to my place and overdose.

[RightNut]

I’m not sure if I’m intrigued because its Gwyneth Paltrow, or revolted because its Gwyneth Paltrow circa 2013.

[SIV]

Gwyneth Paltrow has never been attractive, much less the glamorous and beautiful women Hollywood, the fashion mags and the celebrity press pretend she is. She is a boring and wooden actress as well.

[DH]

No meat on her bones. I’d break her in half. Now, give me any of these women.

http://www.oddee.com/item_98119.aspx

[John C. Randolph]

You’re welcome to them, Captain Ahab.

-jcr

[wwhorton]

Bookmarked.

[sgs]

“Gwyneth Paltrow has never been attractive,”

Moronic hyperbole.

The rest is 100% true though.

[Brian Dixon]

I’m puzzled and intrigued most of all by the fact that this item appears on Reason‘s news feed. I would have guessed I was demographically very unusual as both a reader of Reason and a viewer of Chelsea Lately.

Let me try to guess: Did this give Jacob Sullum a new thought about the Szaszian politics of the idea of sex addiction? Is that where this is going? I’m just working on the riddle of how this particular story ended up here.

[DH]

Id rather read this than more articles about Obama being incomptent. I know he already is. Next!

[Sevo]

Could also be:
‘Celebrity claims victimhood’. Third possibility: Celeb’s agent sees chance for ink, and Sullum takes the bait!
I really don’t know or care ‘who’ she is, I just know her name shows up in places where celebrities names do.

[lap83]

The person who invented the “white people problems” meme should have used Paltrow’s face. She is the definition of privileged white girl.

[SIV]

A career based on nepotism.

If my stereotyping is true,Shackford posted this. Sullum could make a good Szaszian H@R post off of it though.

[Scott S.]

Buzzzzzz! Nope.

[darius404]

Nice try. You’re obviously just another Gillespie sock trying to gin up page views.

[Jon Lester]

That usually suggests an indiscriminate choice of partners, no?