A superior court's recent smack-down of California's high-speed-rail project raises provocative questions not only about the future of the $68-billion-plus train, but about the integrity of the initiative process, reports Steve Greenhut. Do the guarantees in ballot initiatives mean anything after voters have approved them? Or do initiatives offer "carte blanche," whereby officials can take the concept approved at the ballot box and do whatever they choose with it? The judge said the rail authority "abused its discretion," but Gov. Jerry Brown declared that it was full speed ahead, despite the setback.
Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.
Reason is supported by:
Nunes attacked those who wanted to restrain NSA’s snooping. Clearly he never considered whether his call records would be exposed.
The officer turned his body camera off, but the incident was still recorded.
Law enforcement betrayed the trust of gun owners who were doing their best to comply with government-mandated confiscation.
Plus: Twitter terms seem to permit "shadowbanning," the case for Craigslist sex ads, and more…