Jacob Sullum on Eric Holder's Belated but Welcome Criticism of Mandatory Minimums
This week Attorney General Eric Holder criticized "draconian" mandatory minimum sentences and outlined a plan to reduce the time served by low-level, nonviolent drug offenders. Senior Editor Jacob Sullum says it is not clear exactly who will be eligible for such prosecutorial mercy, or to what extent it will go beyond the existing "safety valve" for minor drug offenders. The real significance of Holder's initiative, Sullum suggests, lies in its ratification and amplification of bipartisan regret about the tough-on-crime binge of the 1980s, which expanded the U.S. prison population nearly nine-fold and made us the world leader in per capita incarceration.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?