Court Affirms Strikedown of NYC Large Drink Ban
Drink up, New Yorkers!
New York City's plan to ban large sugary drinks from restaurants and other eateries was an illegal overreach of executive power, a state appeals court ruled on Tuesday, upholding a lower court decision in March that struck down the law.
The law, which would have prohibited those businesses from selling sodas and other sugary beverages larger than 16 ounces, "violated the state principle of separation of powers," the First Department of the state Supreme Court's Appellate Division said in a unanimous decision.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Suck it Bloomy. That is all.
Wow... it's kind of amazing that the decision didn't seem to actually get to the merits of the rule, just that it was a violation of the state constitution to merely implement it.
Which I don't have a problem with. But it just means that whoever was for this (seriously, WHO was for this other than Bloomberg?) would go around screaming about how it was "only" struck down because of a "technicality". I love it when constitutions are referred to as "technicalities", don't you?
There's a reason why my NYC friends call him "Gloomberg".