Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

GOP Split Over Government Shutdown To Block Obamacare, Holder Promises Not To Execute Snowden if Russia Sends Him Back, Feds Celebrate Washington Pot Legalization With Raids: P.M. Links

J.D. Tuccille | 7.26.2013 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • Bob Filner
    San Diego

    Republican members of Congress are split over forcing a full government shutdown to block Obamacare. I vote: go for it.

  • Please send Edward Snowden to us, Eric Holder tells Russia. We promise we won't kill him!
  • Deposed Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi is being charged with conspiracy and espionage over his supposed ties to Hamas.
  • GOP lawmakers from Pennsylvania are all for NSA data collection but opposed to Obamacare data collection. Consistency…hobgoblin…etc.
  • As women start taking numbers to file complaints against San Diego Mayor Bob Filner, pressure builds for him to resign. He says he'll try some therapy. Hands-on, we assume.
  • Marijuana is legal in the state of Washington, you say? Ha! The feds raid dispensaries, anyway.
  • Another juror in the Zimmerman trial has spoken out, saying the defendant "got away with murder," even though that's the charge on which she found him "not guilty." Another juror already said she thought Zimmerman was justified.
  • Eliot Spitzer's wife back him on the campaign trail? Doesn't look like it's going to happen before she's finished filling out those divorce papers.

Did you write about liberty between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2013? Reason welcomes you to enter this year's Bastiat Prize for Journalism, with a total prize purse of $16,000.

Get Reason.com and Reason 24/7 content widgets for your websites.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.  You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here. Have a news tip? Send it to us!

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Prosecution Rests in Whitey Bulger Case

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (341)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Joe M   12 years ago

    Please send Edward Snowden to us, Eric Holder tells Russia. We promise we won't kill him!

    He'll get better.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Yeah, Holder will just put in him solitary for the rest of his life.

      1. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

        "suicide watch" for MSM consumption.

    2. Aresen   12 years ago

      I almost vomited when I read that story.

      Snowden should return only after Obama, Bush, Holder, Yoo, Cheney, and a score of others are already in jail cells.

  2. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Marijuana is legal in the state of Washington, you say? Ha! The feds raid dispensaries, anyway.

    Because fuck you, that's why!

    1. Episiarch   12 years ago

      And I guess we have our answer from the DOJ.

      1. SweatingGin   12 years ago

        Don't worry, in his second term, Obama will actually stop those raids. Maybe even have DOJ remove it from schedule 1.

        1. Episiarch   12 years ago

          I want to see what the reactions from the mayor and the governor are, to be honest.

          1. Gojira   12 years ago

            Actually the raids didn't happen, because Dunphy confidently assured us that since Washington State is libertarian paradise, the feds weren't going to do anything.

            1. Episiarch   12 years ago

              The fucked up thing is that they went after a medical place which has been legal for years, way before recreational use was legalized, and before the State Liquor Board has officially outlined the rules for selling.

              Fuck the feds.

              1. Gojira   12 years ago

                That's what you get for living there. This is indirectly your fault.

          2. SweatingGin   12 years ago

            "Sorry I made you hit me again. I'll do better next time"

          3. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

            "I want to see what the reactions from the mayor and the governor are, to be honest."

            I want to see what the reactions from Harold and Kumar are.

            1. Sevo   12 years ago

              "I want to see what the reactions from Harold and Kumar are."

              They'll polish their Obama bumperstickers.

        2. Sevo   12 years ago

          SweatingGin| 7.26.13 @ 4:33PM |#
          "Don't worry, in his second term, Obama will actually stop those raids. Maybe even have DOJ remove it from schedule 1."

          He WANTS to! He really DOES (sob)! But he can't cause BUUUUUSH! Don't you see????

  3. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

    GAAH! at the photo.

    1. NeonCat   12 years ago

      I thought the photo of Rep. King was creepy, but Jesus! How did this man EVER get elected?

      1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        He's a hugger. It's what makes him so personable.

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          Is that what the kids are calling it these days?

          1. Bobarian   12 years ago

            Just staring him in the eyes constitutes sexual harrasssment

        2. ant1sthenes   12 years ago

          He looks more like a windowlicker.

      2. Ice Nine   12 years ago

        You guys keep talking about lizard people here, pretty soon one's bound to show up.

        1. Tonio   12 years ago

          That's the thing about the reptilians, Icey, you never know unless they want you to know.

      3. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

        It reminds me of the scene in MiB where the roach thing is wearing Edgar's skin and someone comments on him looking weird and he pulls tries to readjust his face and goes "IS THIS BETTER?"

        He had that exact same stretching look at the corners of the eyes and mouth as this guy does.

    2. Aresen   12 years ago

      That face rates an upgrade from "punchable" to "capriole".

    3. Entropy Void   12 years ago

      Anybody else notice the resemblance between Filner and Disney's Stitch?
      http://www.google.com/url?sa=i.....8178799184

  4. Joe M   12 years ago

    Brown man lets down Cleveland one more time.

  5. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

    Latest edits to the Reason Magazine Wiki Page:

    The Hit and Run (also known as "Hit & Run" when known but unfixed bugs in Reason's web software, known as "server squirrels", allow ampersands) community is a well known fever swamp of paranoid conspiracy theory, anonymous advertising posts by 'bots', evaluations of Nick Gillespie's sartorial choices, anti-government extremism, and performance art where denizens compare each other to sex offending Yeti or make each other the subject of time travel stories that would make H. P. Lovecraft blush. Running memes include "salty ham tears", the Cleveland Browns serving as pall bearers, "Lobster Girl", Asian fetish cross-dressing, and the impact of The Golden Girls on one's sexuality. The anonymous 'bot' postings are arguably the most intelligent contributions to H&R discussions. H&R is also home to numerous trolls that are suspected of being the Reason editors attempting to make Progressives and Conservatives look bad by making deliberately stupid arguments in their names.

    1. SugarFree   12 years ago

      STEVE SMITH NO YETI!!! STEVE SMITH RAPE TORSO LONG TIME!!!

    2. Gojira   12 years ago

      I forgot about Lobster Girl.

      1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

        FORGOT about lobster girl!? Does your girlfriend know about your blatant homosexuality?

        1. Gojira   12 years ago

          ...yes. Yes she does.

          1. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

            No side boob for you!
            --Side Boob Nazi

    3. NeonCat   12 years ago

      I haven't seen a "salty ham tear" reference in a while. As a paranoid conspiracy theorist, I suspect there's a plot behind it.

    4. SweatingGin   12 years ago

      Well, yea, but you wrote that.

      Wonder how long it stands?

      1. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

        Every word of it is true, isn't it?

      2. Episiarch   12 years ago

        So Tagliaferro is Mary?

        1. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

          I thought Tagliaferro was dead Suki.

          1. General Butt Naked   12 years ago

            That's that guy's name. I forgot it.

    5. Zakalwe   12 years ago

      Now someone needs to add a section on the genius that is Reason 24-7.

      1. rac3rx   12 years ago
        1. rac3rx   12 years ago

          WTH?

          1. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

            Which is why there is a reference to the server squirrels on the wiki page.

          2. Zakalwe   12 years ago

            Forbidden symbol? Ampersands have been given us, but so much is still verboten.

    6. gaijin   12 years ago

      How's come the 'History' section of that entry doesn't list Tuccille as a writer? Someone get on that, willya!

    7. Tonio   12 years ago

      And in all honesty, HP Lovecraft was a bit of a prude, so probably not easy to make him blush.

      1. NeonCat   12 years ago

        NOT easy?

      2. Tonio   12 years ago

        probably not difficult

        1. ant1sthenes   12 years ago

          I think it would have been difficult, since he would skip discomfort and embarrassment and go straight to gut-wrenching disgust or existential horror.

          1. NeonCat   12 years ago

            But he would still blush, just in a very erudite, wordy way.

    8. John   12 years ago

      No Tow the Lion?

      1. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

        Added.

        1. kinnath   12 years ago

          Tow, the Blue Lion

        2. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

          Seriously..No Fosdick reference...C'MON:
          Pizza, circumcision, gaming, BEER..this board is soo much more complex.

          1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

            It was more complex when Postrel was in charge.

            1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

              You know who else people reminisce about being in charge?

              1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

                FDR?

              2. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

                FDR?

              3. Episiarch   12 years ago

                A little girl named Newt?

              4. sloopyinca   12 years ago

                The Romans?

            2. Clich? Bandit   12 years ago

              EXACTLY!

    9. Ted S.   12 years ago

      I presume most of us here find this description funny?

    10. Tonio   12 years ago

      Fever swamp. I like that and am proud to be part of it. Well done, everyone.

    11. Generic Stranger   12 years ago

      It's been reverted already.

      1. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

        Some asshole in Pennsylvania reverted it.

    12. SweatingGin   12 years ago

      And... it's gone.

      It was nice while it lasted. You might be able to get some of the edits to stick around at Rational Wiki

      1. Irish   12 years ago

        The things rational wiki already says are more insane than anything I could make up.

        They have an entire page trying to argue that Somalia is libertarian. Things that we say as jokes are taken seriously by the mouth breathing idiots who post at Rational Wiki.

        1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

          "Despite this entreaty to civility, Hit & Run's reader commentary remains -- in keeping with anarchistic principles -- uncivil, disorderly and almost entirely off-topic at all times. However, and despite the claim that comments are unmoderated, ideological dissidents are now routinely censored, IP-banned and "disappeared," Chile-style, in the Hit & Run chatrooms, to the general -- albeit grudging -- approval of the still-devoted anarcho-libertarian commentariat. Whoops."

          Which dissenters? American? Who else?

          1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

            Alleged Mary clones. I was banned for a few hours on my first day and accused of being a Mary clone when I engaged in some deliberate trolling by exaggerating my anti-immigration political preferences and being mean to John.

            1. Tonio   12 years ago

              If being mean to John were an actual thing, I'd have been banned repeatedly. Double-secret banned, in fact. Yet here I am.

              However, trolling as she-who-shall-not-be-named is unforgivable.

          2. ant1sthenes   12 years ago

            H&R isn't anarchy, it's a very (but not infinitely) indulgent dictatorship.

      2. Damned Fool   12 years ago

        If you have to refer to yourself as "rational," you probably aren't.

        1. Knarf Yenrab (prev. An0nB0t)   12 years ago

          Oh, come on. How else would you possibly signify that you're better, smarter, and, most importantly, cooler than all of the irrational people?

      3. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

        "The comments section on Reason.com's "Hit & Run" page rivals Yahoo! News and YouTube for being the worst hive of scum and villainy on the Internet"

        I fucking resemble that remark!

      4. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

        Thanks to the Rational Wiki, I found this.

        1. Irish   12 years ago

          HAHAHAHAH! I'm pretty sure that was actually made by Mary. Is it possible that Rational Wiki's H&R page was actually written by Mary? That would make sense.

          1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

            My favorite of those videos is by far "Libertarians are Comical Geniuses".

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....xo07WWxLLk

            Is it wrong that I find her videos funny and delightful?

          2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

            My favorite of those videos is by far "Libertarians are Comical Geniuses".

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....xo07WWxLLk

            Is it wrong that I find her videos funny and delightful?

            1. Irish   12 years ago

              In fairness, a lot of people here do fall back on inside jokes and H&R memes instead of actual humor.

              I feel like that's true of any forum or chat room though, so acting like it's just us is absurd.

            2. Killazontherun   12 years ago

              That one cracked me up. even a stopped clock will shoot a cop twice a day.

      5. Joe M   12 years ago

        Wow, that site is a joke.

    13. Warrren   12 years ago

      Some idioter changed it back.

      1. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

        Someone in Equinunk ,PA or Beach Lake, PA.

        1. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

          My next edit will go into detail about how everyone in Equinunk is overcompensating for a tiny penis.

    14. General Butt Naked   12 years ago

      What ever happened to Suki and her handler, John Somethingorother?

      Gawd, she(he) was tiresome.

    15. CE   12 years ago

      I'm glad they think I'm an anonymous "bot".

  6. Joe M   12 years ago

    Hell yes. Anyone else getting a bit excited?

    Rand Paul top pick for Republicans in 2016

    The Public Policy Polling poll found Paul leading with 16 percent of Republican primary voters saying they would vote for him if the election were today. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan tie for second place with 13 percent. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz is at 12 percent, and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio trails at 10 percent.

    1. Bam!   12 years ago

      But Christie called him dangerous, right after hugging Barack Obama.

      1. ant1sthenes   12 years ago

        He's a hugger.

    2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

      A man in Cleveland has requested that Rand Paul be the Republican Party Nominee, so that the party can let him down one more time.

      Seriously, I want to like Rand Paul, but I know that if I get attached, I'll just end up disappointed again. Either he'll lose the nomination to the bastard love child of Rick Santorum and Steve King, or he'll win and turn out to have been a statist theocon all along.

      1. Joe M   12 years ago

        If you're afraid to get hurt, you'll never be able to truly love. I'd rather go all in and get burned than miss the first chance in my lifetime for a half-decent president.

        1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

          Despair is my only lover now.

    3. CE   12 years ago

      If you're excited by "leading with 16 percent" you must have forgotten 2012 already.... 16 percent doesn't win. Neither does 28 percent, or 31 percent.

      1. Joe M   12 years ago

        Ron Paul never lead the national polls. He briefly led in Iowa and maybe one or two other states. Rand is leading consistently. He's also much better received by the powers that be and is playing the game a lot better.

  7. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Please send Edward Snowden to us, Eric Holder tells Russia. We promise we won't kill him!

    The Attorney General also promised that he would not personally sodomize Snowden's mother, because it's normal for the government to guarantee they won't do something that's illegal.

    1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

      I think he meant the death penalty, which *is* legal. Though extremely difficult to enforce in America.

  8. Zakalwe   12 years ago

    I now have a life size Archer cardboard cutout standing in the corner of my home office because why not. It'll all be worth it the first time a cop raids my house, walks in and starts shooting the thing.

    1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

      It should be a cutout of Cheryl Tunt.

      1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

        That's my Real Doll. The neck grooves cost extra.

    2. Tonio   12 years ago

      Dude...

      1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

        I know. My shrink says I'm in the danger zone.

  9. Mark Markson   12 years ago

    Great article, I totally agree!

    As I was telling Nicole, if you can deep throat at least 15cm (6 in) of male penis, you can earn up to $10,000 per month broadcasting from your laptop at home.

    Learn more at http://www.workfromhomesolutions.com

    1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      Sorry but Nicole's not the one who has been going on and on about dick lately. That's Kristen.

      1. Episiarch   12 years ago

        Dude, you're missing the point: $10,000 per month!!!

      2. John   12 years ago

        Is her b/f out of town or something?

        1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

          "...asking for a friend."

        2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          I think he's coming into town or something. I haven't been paying that much attention to it, but it sounds like she's planning some big orgy with fellow H&R folks in the DC area. I even thought you said you were going.

          1. John   12 years ago

            I said I was. But if it is an orgy, I am sure I will be disinvited if I haven't already have been.

        3. Gojira   12 years ago

          I appreciate that the measurements were given in metric, and imperial standard.

          Also, why specify the male penis? Is there a female variety?

          I think American may have a point. These clearly english-as-second-language bots are weird and off-putting.

          1. Rhywun   12 years ago

            He's fitting in around here just fine, isn't he.

    2. gaijin   12 years ago

      if you can deep throat at least 15cm (6 in)

      who can't?

      1. Tonio   12 years ago

        Thank you, Jimbo.

        1. Episiarch   12 years ago

          THAT'S NOT JJ TONIO

          1. Joe M   12 years ago

            These g-js all look the same to him.

      2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        People afflicted with severe TMJ?

      3. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

        My neighbors two-month-old baby has yet to hit the mark.

    3. All-Seeing Monocle   12 years ago

      "male" penis?

      1. Tonio   12 years ago

        Well, ovipositors are pretty penile.

      2. Bobarian   12 years ago

        "male" penis?

        Yes, how does this affect Warty?

  10. rts   12 years ago

    Last night's DocZone's episode Wind Rush was a pretty critical look at the wind industry, including its negative effects on health, property values and they even mentioned the subsidies required to make it competitive as a negative.

    1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

      They completely glossed over the necessity for wind to have backup generation which provides 70%+ of the actual rated output of the wind farm. Or that without massive subsidies these things would never be built because they don't provide cheap power. Nowhere that renewables have been installed over conventional power plants has electricity prices come down. They are just a super expensive way to run a natural gas turbine when you really break it down.

    2. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

      How about dead birds by the hundreds of thousands per annum, including various endangered raptors?

      It happens about once a month here, on the barren foothills of one of America's green-energy boomtowns: A soaring golden eagle slams into a wind farm's spinning turbine and falls, mangled and lifeless, to the ground.

      Killing these iconic birds is not just an irreplaceable loss for a vulnerable species. It's also a federal crime, a charge that the Obama administration has used to prosecute oil companies when birds drown in their waste pits, and power companies when birds are electrocuted by their power lines.

      But the administration has never fined or prosecuted a wind-energy company, even those that flout the law repeatedly. Instead, the government is shielding the industry from liability and helping keep the scope of the deaths secret.

      [. . .]

      The result is a green industry that's allowed to do not-so-green things. It kills protected species with impunity and conceals the environmental consequences of sprawling wind farms.

      More than 573,000 birds are killed by the country's wind farms each year, including 83,000 hunting birds such as hawks, falcons and eagles, according to an estimate published in March in the peer-reviewed Wildlife Society Bulletin.

      It's almost like protecting the environment from real, measureable harm isn't a priority.

      1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

        BUT ITS GREEEEN SO YOU MUST BE LYING!!!!!!!!

      2. rts   12 years ago

        IIRC that got only a passing mention, as the main focus was on the ill effects on people and neighbourhoods.

        1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

          The most significant ill effect is the resulting increase in electricity prices which was, as I said above, not given any air time.

          1. rts   12 years ago

            Well, sure. I'm just glad to see anything outside of the green Orthodoxy on the CBC. I takes what I can gets.

            1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

              True. I was surprised to see them doing any criticizing but they still ignored the actual important issues to do with energy production and keeping a stable grid (because it shows how ineffective wind power is).

          2. rts   12 years ago

            If you click on the Pro/Cons infographic, they do mention the subsidies and higher cost versus natural gas and nuclear as a con.

        2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

          I seem to remember reading that it was causing local shifts in climate or something in Palm Springs (not the article I read originally but on the same topic).

      3. Warrren   12 years ago

        If they can't evolve to be able to get out of the way they deserve it!

        /Tulpa

    3. CE   12 years ago

      The "wind industry"? I thought that stuff just blew. Someone makes it?

  11. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    French legislature repeals law that penalized people for insulting the president.

    Well in that case: Fran?ois Hollande peut aller baiser une ch?vre!

    1. DJF   12 years ago

      His mother was a hamster and his father smelt of elderberries.

  12. rts   12 years ago

    'Fantastic Four' depart B.C. with $100M in movie revenue

    Peter Leitch, the president of North Shore Studios, said Thursday The Fantastic Four Reboot has moved production to Louisiana because of the lucrative tax incentives offered in that state.

    ...

    B.C. offers a 33 per cent subsidy on labour and other incentives if the filming is done outside of Metro Vancouver or is for visual effects work.

    1. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

      Was this the musical?

      1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

        Is it just me, or is this actually good?

    2. NeonCat   12 years ago

      "It's fleeing town with tax money time!"

      1. rts   12 years ago

        My plane leaves in less than one minute.

    3. CE   12 years ago

      Somehow I doubt they will do better than Jessica Alba.

  13. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    What I don't understand is if a police chief comes out and says an officer used excessive force, why does that officer not have charges hanging over his head?

    Oh, that's right. That due process cops enjoy affords them an opportunity to take a vacation instead of face assault and battery charges when they clearly violate the fucking law.

    1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

      The brave heroes of PoliceOne chime in on the situation.

      1. PH2050   12 years ago

        How they toss around the word "brother" seems very creepy to me. Collectivists gonna collectivize.

  14. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

    I absolutely think the GOP should go balls to the wall in trying to kill Obamacare and any other bullshit government programs they have the guts to attack.

    1. andarm16   12 years ago

      Why would they do something so non serious. Everyone knows that all serious people support ObamaCare.

      1. Irish   12 years ago

        I also think the GOP probably wants Obamacare to implode and don't want to take this albatross away from the Democrats.

        The Obamacare disaster could yield serious dividends to the Republicans.

      2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Perhaps it's time for the GOP to cast aside seriousness.

        1. andarm16   12 years ago

          But MSNBC keeps telling them that the country has undergone a demographic shift, and that conservatives can't ever win again.

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            That's where they screw up--believing such nonsense.

          2. Zeb   12 years ago

            Just like in 2002 when the Republicans established a permanent majority.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              I know, it's like all of this wasn't said in great detail in reverse. Heck, they were saying that during Clinton's second term, since he had to shift so far right in response to 1994.

              There are two truths. The first is that neither party is very competent, either at political campaigns or at governing. The second is that the other party is always the alternative to the incompetence of the first party.

              So long as the second is true, we'll continue to go back and forth. If a third party ever successfully rises and holds on, that may change, though I think history suggests it will just replace or be co-opted by one of the two majors.

    2. CE   12 years ago

      They don't need Obamacare as an excuse to shut down the fedgov. Prove the liberals right and shut it down for no reason at all.

  15. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

    Republican members of Congress are split over forcing a full government shutdown to block Obamacare. I vote: go for it.

    Might as well. They already get blamed for obstructinating everything with their evil obstructinating evilness anyway.

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      That's one reason. The other is that Obamacare gives a majority of people the shakes, and I think a significant percentage just want some end to all of the madness.

      1. John   12 years ago

        Make Obama and Reid shut the government down to fund a law everyone hates.

        1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

          It would be hillarious to watch Obama argue that he can implement it anyway.

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            Even these days, that would probably be a bridge too far. Like I said earlier, we're in the at? phase of his presidency right now. Next, nemesis.

    2. John   12 years ago

      A shut down would hurt Democrats much worse. They really are the party of stupid. All of those government employees who won't be getting a paycheck generally don't vote Republican. And all of those regulations that won't be being enforced were not created to benefit GOP voters. No one but the Dems and their base will feel any pain. But they are still terrified to do it because people in the media will say mean things about them.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        There's a great point in there--the GOP leadership does worry about the media too much. Why bother? They're going to either trash you or damn you with faint praise, anyway, so fuck 'em.

        1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          And as I pointed out, they already are getting bashed.

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            Exactly. Nothing to lose, all sorts of stuff to gain.

            1. andarm16   12 years ago

              You have to think like a serious Republican. All Serious Republicans know that they are just one itty bitty move to the left away from being media darlings, and the only reason that Romney didn't win was that he had that nasty libertarian fiscal conservative Ryan running with him.

              1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                It's like this one hurdle they simply can't jump. It makes no sense at all.

              2. CE   12 years ago

                Actually, Ryan did hurt him.

            2. General Butt Naked   12 years ago

              If you assume that republican politicians are just big government stooges, their actions make much more sense.

              If you instead assume that they'd really like there to be a free market and a small government, you have to come up with a whole new group of assumptions to explain their behavior.

  16. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Glenn Greenwald will testify before Congress via video link on NSA surveillance.

    Yeah, I don't think he would be able to come to the US.

    1. John   12 years ago

      In all seriousness, what will he have to say?

      1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

        Grayson actually seems determined to ask about discrepancies between Greenwald's reporting on NSA surveillance and what the government has said.

  17. NeonCat   12 years ago

    Soon you could have gold in your heart (if you have a bad heart).

    I'm sure it will be de rigueur for libertarians in the future if not as visible as monocles. I wonder if it will set off metal scanners. "Oh, it must be the gold nanofibers in my heart."

    1. ant1sthenes   12 years ago

      Required surgery for ladies of negotiable affection who aspire to something better.

      1. ant1sthenes   12 years ago

        Oh dear. Apparently it was researchers in Tel Aviv who discovered how to patch gold into the human heart. Way to play to stereotypes, guys.

        1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

          You know who else was fond of body parts with gold in them?

          1. Nazdrakke   12 years ago

            2LiveCrew?

          2. CE   12 years ago

            Goldfinger?

  18. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    And in other double-standard news, a Denver man has been awarded $40,000 in damages for a beating he took at the hands of a deputy.

    But the deputy's family will not lose their breadwinner, as the officer that committed the assault was terminated instead of criminally prosecuted.* Taxpayers, on the other hand, have not been notified of their options on whether or not they will be forced to pay for the crime.

    *A fate worse than death to a cop, as we've been told.

  19. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

    I assume there's going to be another H&R NFL pick 'em this year (though maybe we should figure out the scoring a bit more concretely beforehand). Would anyone else kind of like to have a second one where you have to make all the picks before the season starts?

    1. Episiarch   12 years ago

      Here's my pick: the Seahawks.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Wrong.

        1. Episiarch   12 years ago

          You're right. I should have picked the Buccaneers.

          HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            You're oddly delusional about that team for a transplant.

            The Bucs? Offense should be very good. The defense is a question mark, but it's definitely improved. I think 10-11 wins if they avoid any major injuries or fuck-ups. Might be enough to get to the playoffs, anyway.

            1. Warrren   12 years ago

              Stop going back in time to post what I'm about to say.

            2. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

              Depends which Josh Freeman shows up.

              1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                That, too. But he couldn't have it easier with possibly the best O-line in the game, at least a couple good receivers, and an excellent running back. But he's a bit of a headcase or something, so there's no telling.

                1. Warrren   12 years ago

                  I've listened to several of his appearances on the local radio station and he sounds very intelligent and skilled at game prep. and he has the physical skills so he should not have a problem winning games.

                  And historically the Bucs have been just awful at offensive* play-calling. So maybe they've gotten better there as well.

                  This is the first I've heard of him being a headcase though. So ummm...don't know where that will lead.

                  *And late game defensive play calling. For example last year against RGIII and the Skins.

                  1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                    Well, maybe I overstated my problems with Freeman. He's inconsistent in a dramatic way. My problem with him all along, even in his good season, is that he's not super accurate.

                2. Episiarch   12 years ago

                  You do realize the destruction the Seahawks delivered to a bunch of teams last year, right, and that with a rookie QB and needing the first half to warm up?

                  1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                    Losing to the Cardinals, the Rams, the Dolphins. . .any other crappy teams I'm forgetting?

                    I think they're a good team, but they're not great. They may get there, but I don't think the pieces are all there yet.

                    I'll give them one thing--they're at least trying to play defense. It makes me ill how bad defense is in the league right now. Even the good defenses, like, say, San Francisco, aren't all that great. Part of it is the rules and officiating, but it's also some weird obsession with throwing the ball. Bring back an emphasis on defense, and that won't work.

                    1. Warrren   12 years ago

                      Better defense comes from the secondary being able to do their job. Stop all this touchy-feely PI crap and let them be more physical with receivers and defense will get better.

                  2. Warrren   12 years ago

                    I had quite forgotten about all that. Still though they can't seem to finish.

                3. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

                  I forget where I read it but someone made a point that he's still really young. He's been around for a while but is still 25 (or so, too lazy to check). Based on nothing at all, I would say quarterbacks begin to peak around then. Which makes what the "gang of four" did last year even more impressive.

                  F'ing Kaepernick.

          2. Warrren   12 years ago

            The Bucs improved a lot last year. I don't think they are SB capable yet but a winning record is not out of the question.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              That's what I think. They could prove better than I expect, but with the uncertainties about how the defense will perform, coupled with some depth issues, I'm sticking with near-playoff to maybe making it. Beyond that is unlikely this year, unless the planets align.

              One additional problem for the Seahawks is Harvin. They really needed that explosiveness.

          3. sloopyinca   12 years ago

            Well, I know one thing. the Browns will be letting...

            nevermind.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              No, this is their year. I mean, they won the Super Bowl last year, after all.

            2. Warrren   12 years ago

              I just let some browns down....

              1. CE   12 years ago

                Colts.

      2. Warrren   12 years ago

        Ha ha ha.

      3. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

        I am conflicted about my Packers. I think both the Niners and the Seahawks will be very tough to beat. But with the two new RBs their offense could be amazing if the line stays injury-free. And if Nick Perry and Datone Jones can contribute, the defense could be as good as it was in 2010. After last year, I'm tempering my expectations but would not be surprised if they're great. Week 1 will be interesting.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          It's the defense that will kill them. I don't think they've solved that problem yet.

          1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

            I tend to agree, but like I said, am hopeful about Jones and Perry taking away attention from Matthews. The secondary has some playmakers, but the inside LBs are crap. I am praying for more pressure on the QB leading to more turnovers, which was the key to success in 2009 and 2010.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              Never know. Sometimes, players just suddenly start getting it and things come together. Some crappy defenses have miraculously become decent the next year.

    2. sloopyinca   12 years ago

      Get off my Kool-Aid!

      The Reason Hit & Run J sub D Memorial is all that keeps me respected here. Were it not for the interest in that league, I'd be the laughingstock dunphy makes me out to be.

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        Well I would be happy to only be a participant in this hypothetical league.

  20. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Change.gov, a website that listed promises Obama made during his campaigns, has disappeared down the Memory Hole.

    Why the change?

    Here's one possibility, from the administration's ethics agenda:

    Protect Whistleblowers: Often the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government is an existing government employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out. Such acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and often save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled. We need to empower federal employees as watchdogs of wrongdoing and partners in performance. Barack Obama will strengthen whistleblower laws to protect federal workers who expose waste, fraud, and abuse of authority in government. Obama will ensure that federal agencies expedite the process for reviewing whistleblower claims and whistleblowers have full access to courts and due process.
    It may be that Obama's description of the importance of whistleblowers went from being an artifact of his campaign to a political liability. It wouldn't be the first time administration positions disappear from the internet when they become inconvenient descriptions of their assurances.

    1. Episiarch   12 years ago

      Well, of course it did. Though I don't know why they bothered; his sycophants don't care what he does because actions don't matter to them anyway, only words.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Not to mention that taking it down doesn't take it away. On the Internet, everything is forever.

    2. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

      He'd protect them if they'd just start blowing the whistle on his political enemies instead of his administration.

  21. Killazontherun   12 years ago

    Rand Paul in a visit to Chile praises the late dictator Pinochet, says he was 'inspired by the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution, and the words of Thomas Jefferson.'

    http://www.foxnews.com/politic.....ng-fathers

    1. NeonCat   12 years ago

      Pretty words are meaningless without the commitment to the ideals they represent.

    2. A Serious Man   12 years ago

      And Castro once wrote a letter to FDR asking for a silver dollar. Camaraderie with our ideals, I tell ya!

    3. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      Jesus, Obama really said that? Holy cow.

      It's not Rand for those who don't click the article, so relax. It's His Eminence talking about some other dictator of the communist variety.

      1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

        It's probably accurate. Almost all anti-colonial independence movements/leaders with any intellectual background claim some inspiration/admiration related to the Founding Fathers.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          Oh, sure. In fact, I believe I've read that before. Except that Jefferson didn't say oppress your people and take their stuff.

          1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

            To be fair, the Loyalists weren't his people.

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              I assume Obama was just trying to show some connection, which is fine, but this is the kind of political misstep that the media used to crucify Bush (or Reagan, now that I think about it) for.

              He could've skipped the whole thing and just praised them for their increased economic freedom or something like that. Something not offensive to the families of the hundreds of thousands of people killed in Vietnam by the joker or the ones still being oppressed. Not to mention the French and our veterans of the war over there.

              1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

                That tears it. Our vacation next year will be in France next year so I can apologize for the insensitivity of our current occupant in office to them personally. Yes, by our, I mean you're coming too, PL.

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  ROAD TRIP!

      2. Killazontherun   12 years ago

        It's not Rand for those who don't click the article

        Whoops, my mistake. I was wondering why the story wasn't getting any attention in the media.

        1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

          Not like we went to war against the guy, that there are still a million or so vets who gnash their teeth when his name is mentioned, or that we absorbed several million immigrants who escaped the oppression of his regime who would also be offended by such praise, no not like that at all.

          1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

            And don't forget our French allies. Are they demanding an apology?

            1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

              That was the impression President Obama gave on Thursday when he spoke to the press after his meeting with Vietnamese President Truong Tan Sang. Sang brought Obama a copy of a letter sent to President Harry Truman from Ho Chi Minh in which the communist dictator spoke hopefully of cooperation with the United States.

              Obama, striking a wistful tone, observed that it may have taken 67 years, but the United States and Vietnam were finally enjoying the relationship that Ho once wrote of. After all, Obama said, Ho had been "inspired by the words of Thomas Jefferson."

              Obama isn't just stroking communist dick here, he likely really believes that if not for the belligerence of anti-communist, Vietnam would have been a free and prosperous social democracy these past seventy years. Modern progs are the biggest fools in the history of time.

              1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

                The communists were just one purge away from heaven on earth.

              2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                Also worth noting, these characters would rise and try to woo us and/or the Soviets. Some indication that Castro did the same thing, for instance.

              3. PH2050   12 years ago

                They just needed the right Five Year Plan and everything would've been gravy.

    4. ant1sthenes   12 years ago

      I hope you're posting it like that on Facebook or HuffPo or whatever. "That son of a -- wait, what the fuck is this?"

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Sadly, most of the true believers like that Obama praises communist dictators. Note their total lack of concern by earlier administration complements to Mao. Who likely killed more people than anyone ever.

      2. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

        Agreed.

      3. Damned Fool   12 years ago

        Progressives are to power what insects are to bright lights, PL.

    5. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

      I saw Ho Chi Minh's body in Hanoi and it wasn't even the creepiest communist nostalgia I saw on that trip.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Was he holding the Constitution?

    6. Michael S. Langston   12 years ago

      IIRC - liberals of all persuasions have tried to tar Libertarians (and conservatives because to them they're the same) by stating incorrectly that Milton Friedman loved Pinochet.

      It wasn't true at all - but I wonder if they'll

      a) stop tarring people by associating with Pinochet since their hero seems to like him a great deal
      or
      b) tar Obama

      Of course that assumes some level of rationality... I expect

      c) dismiss is and continue on as if it didn't happen or is completely irrelevant

      1. Michael S. Langston   12 years ago

        RTFA - it wasn't Pinochet...

      2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        What are you talking about, Mike? Pinochet was a US puppet, so everything he did was ipso facto bad. Ho Chi Minh was an anti-imperialist, so everything he did was ipso facto good.

        I can guarantee you that in alternate universe 1237 where the German military suppressed the Nazis and revoked democracy, leftists are still whining about how right-wingers destroyed a government of the people and the injustices done to Hitler, that tragically flawed but great peoples' revolutionary.

  22. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    Holy shit! I guess if you're a LVPD officer and you shoot a man sitting in a car, the penalties are quite serious.

    And by quite serious, I mean not serious at all.

    FTA: "In this case, the process worked and Officer Roston will be allowed to go back to the job that he was trained to do." the LVPPA said in a statement released shortly after the announcement.

    They train them to shoot people in parked cars for no reason? And what process, fuckhead? The same process a "civilian" would have been put through had he walked up and shot a stranger for no apparent reason?

    1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

      You continue to ruin my day with these stories.

    2. Dunphy (the real one)   12 years ago

      waaaaaaaaah!

      1. Generic Stranger   12 years ago

        What, is Dunkin' out of Donuts?

      2. General Butt Naked   12 years ago

        Remember citizens, if you're pulled over by an officer on a dark and lonely road, be prepared to defend yourself. This^ is what they think of your life. It's open season on the American people. Arm up.

      3. Atanarjuat   12 years ago

        ^Ladies and gents, that is the most intelligent thing Dumphuck ever said.

  23. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

    True story:

    Yesterday I asked a cop for directions. His first words were "Know where [Donut Shop] is?"

  24. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

    2 Chilly: You have gone too far with that pic. Too. Fucking. Far.

    1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      You're just upset that the reality of reptilians is gnawing at what you thought you knew.

    2. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

      Police Directions:

      1) Shoot the Dog
      2) You mean geographic directions?

  25. db   12 years ago

    I spent a lot of time on interstate highways earlier this week and noticed a strange thing. This sudden and pleasant change in the weather appears to be so extreme that a noticeable number of people are wearing hooded sweatshirts in the middle of the day. Is the weather really that shocking to some or is there some sort of mass moron psychosis going around?

    1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

      Moron psychosis. You should shoot all of them immediately to ensure your safety.

      1. NeonCat   12 years ago

        I saw a dude wearing an "I am Trayvon Martin" t-shirt. I thought about screaming "ZOMBIE!!!" but thought better of it.

    2. NeonCat   12 years ago

      The latter, I believe.

    3. CE   12 years ago

      That was a Facebook exec.

  26. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    MORAL PANIC!!! In which we face the scourge of 'Smack Cam', where college bros video tape each other smacking people.

    Sure, some of the 1,000+ #SmackCam tweets are probably all in good fun ? the inaugural #SmackCam was a joke between friends ? but the ones I've seen remind me of Emily Bazelon's definition of bullying: "physical or verbal abuse, repeated over time, and involving a power imbalance. In other words, it's about one person with more social status lording it over another person, over and over again, to make him miserable."

    Update: The girl who got smacked in the head with a jug was apparently in on the joke. Violence against women is hilarious!!

    Why so serious?

    1. NeonCat   12 years ago

      There's always a new scourge.

    2. Bam!   12 years ago

      Violence against women is hilarious!!

      Wrong: It's sexy.

    3. Irish   12 years ago

      Girl with sense of humor makes joke. Feminists without sense of humor whine. /Almost every Jezebel article

    4. rts   12 years ago

      Sounds like happy slapping from the UK.

      What happens when you happy slap the wrong guy's gal.

    5. PH2050   12 years ago

      RAPE CULTURE!!!11!1

  27. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Protect Whistleblowers: Often the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government is an existing government employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out. Such acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and often save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled. We need to empower federal employees as watchdogs of wrongdoing and partners in performance. Barack Obama will strengthen whistleblower laws to protect federal workers who expose waste, fraud, and abuse of authority in government. Obama will ensure that federal agencies expedite the process for reviewing whistleblower claims and whistleblowers have full access to courts and due process.

    And then, the executions!

  28. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    It terrifies me that someone else might know what the hell any of this is supposed to mean:

    I can't get enough of this parody?I don't even know if parody is the right word, because it doesn't have the sort of nasty edge that you almost need to be a parody?of Robin Thicke's "Blurred Lines" done by Mod Carousel, a Seattle-based boylesque group. The video takes the immediately-infamous "nude women/clothed men" original video and gender reverses it, but not in a tit-for-tat way so much as a very natural way that uses that actual signifiers of female power and sexualized male bodies.

    1. Irish   12 years ago

      Having not looked at what that link is, I'll make a guess.

      Marcotte?

    2. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

      The video takes the immediately-infamous "nude women/clothed men" original video and gender reverses it, but not in a tit-for-tat way so much as a very natural way that uses that actual signifiers of female power and sexualized male bodies.

      Is this supposed to be some cutting-edge new idea? Because CFNM (clothed female / naked male porn has been around for a long time. Just Google "Pure CFNM"

      1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        I was thinking more Shania Twain's Man I Feel Like a Woman video as having been an express flipping of the Addicted to Love video.

        1. CE   12 years ago

          H&R eeds more Shania.

    3. Killazontherun   12 years ago

      The video takes the immediately-infamous "nude women/clothed men" original video and gender reverses it,

      IOW, every British movie that has come out over the last twenty five years.

  29. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Update: The girl who got smacked in the head with a jug was apparently in on the joke.

    Traitorous BITCH!

  30. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    Evidently, some crazy feminist judicial activist has been nominated for the DC court of appeals:

    Sen. Ted Cruz, for instance, accused Pillard of arguing that abstinence-only programs were inherently unconstitutional.

    [...]

    Pillard argues in this document not that it's unconstitutional to scold kids to keep it in their pants to your heart's content, but that the specific gender roles taught in many abstinence-only courses violate the students' right to equal protection.

    This will end well.

    1. Irish   12 years ago

      Sen. Ted Cruz, for instance, accused Pillard of arguing that abstinence-only programs were inherently unconstitutional.

      [...]

      Pillard argues in this document not that it's unconstitutional to scold kids to keep it in their pants to your heart's content, but that the specific gender roles taught in many abstinence-only courses violate the students' right to equal protection.

      So what Ted Cruz said is an accurate claim about what she believes.

    2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      Wait, what?

    3. NeonCat   12 years ago

      Look, judges being impartial and dignified is soooo Old School. Judges should be totally political and partisan.

  31. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    Amanda Marcotte is still a vengeful bitch:

    I have to point out to Alex Seitz-Wald that whoever tweeted, "Zimmerman can pull someone from a burning car, but he can't a push 17-year-old, 150 pound boy off of him?" was not engaging in a conspiracy theory, at least in that tweet. They are arguing that Zimmerman's defense was based on a lie. He claimed that he had to shoot Trayvon Martin, because Martin jumped him and overpowered him. It's well within the bounds of reason to be skeptical of that defense, particularly in light of all the evidence pointing to a much more likely narrative, which is that Zimmerman picked a fight with Martin and used Martin's attempts to escape a pretext to murder him.

    Delightful.

    1. Irish   12 years ago

      I really want someone to sucker punch Amanda Marcotte so she can see how easy it is to lose a fight when someone gets the drop on you.

      1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        Obviously Amanda Marcotte, fighting expert that she is, would easily have been able to win that fight with her expert abilities.

        Also, it is striking that this is the exact argument used by rape apologists ("why didn't she fight back"/"she had recourse to leave if she wanted")... but we wouldn't want to cross the streams.

      2. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

        When I was 18, a friend of mine blindsided me and tackled me to the ground, and held me in a grip such that I couldn't get out. She was strong for a girl and pretty athletic, but there's no way she could have done that without blindsiding me. She refused to ever find out, until a couple years later. I won three times in a row. She had no chance.

        So, yeah, even if Zimmerman was stronger than Martin (which I am not willing to grant), I can easily believe that he got the jump on Zimmerman.

        With that said, I weigh about 185-190. There are many, many 150 men (and women) who could kick my ass without blindsiding me.

        1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

          "So, yeah, even if Zimmerman was stronger than Martin (which I am not willing to grant), I can easily believe that he got the jump on Zimmerman."

          ^^THIS^^ is exactly what the thugs do in my neighborhood. They walk up to someone and asked them for the time or a cigarette and as the person looks at their watch or goes for their pack of smokes, they get sucker-punched and robbed. It's one of the reasons it seemed likely, given the evidence, that Martin did just that.

        2. Irish   12 years ago

          They also just assume that weight=strength and Zimmerman therefore should have been able to win. I have a friend who outweighs me by probably 25 pounds, but it's mostly some extra fat. I'm about 170 pounds, but I'm in good shape. I guarantee you I could beat my friend in a fight.

          Weight does not magically equate to strength unless you work out.

          1. Episiarch   12 years ago

            170?!? Maybe you should squat more.

            1. Irish   12 years ago

              I'M NATURALLY THIN, OKAY! IT'S A HEALTHY WEIGHT!

            2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              It's a dense 170, Episiarch.

              1. Irish   12 years ago

                It's a healthy weight...

                -Runs from room sobbing, but in a totally manly way.-

                1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

                  This is why you don't let the Irish into respectable society...

                  1. Warrren   12 years ago

                    No, there are much better reasons than that.

                    1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                      H&R is respectable society?

            3. Brett L   12 years ago

              He's 4'11"

        3. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

          You could have escaped if you weren't hampered by your huge...backpack.

    2. ant1sthenes   12 years ago

      Yes, it's much more likely (not, "plausible", but much more likely) that someone deliberately murdered the shit out of someone knowing that there were witnesses around and cops that they called on the way. DERP.

      1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

        And how he added a broken nose and a bloodied up head from it being smashed repeatedly in to the sidewalk before the cops got there about a minute after the shooting is pretty impressive too.

      2. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        She has new evidence that Zimmerman played lacrosse.

    3. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      I think Zimmerman's most cunning plan was the part about getting beaten like an MMA loser while Martin was sitting on his chest. The prosecution's witness testified to that. In this age of TV law everywhere, do you have to be a lawyer to realize the trial-ending significance of that testimony?

      Maybe Zimmerman started the fight, though Martin's own friend is now saying he through the first punch. But she probably is only guessing herself, unless Martin said something about it on the phone. But the evidence doesn't indicate that at all. In fact, it probably shades the other direction, if anything.

      I don't much care about this case on its own merits, but this political campaign is nauseating. For those on the left pummeling this issue to make sure we focus on nothing important, just remember that credibility is easy to give away, not so easy to get.

      1. Episiarch   12 years ago

        Oh please, ProL. Credibility? They have no credibility to anyone who isn't a braindead partisan hack. Unfortunately, there are a FUCKTON of braindead partisan hacks out there.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          I wasn't suggesting that that ship hadn't sailed long ago.

        2. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

          I've been amazed how virtually everyone on "Travon's side" who gets a voice in the media -- be it government officials, columnists, or just letter-to-the-editor writers -- has the story so wrong. They all usually insist that
          1) Travon was doing absolutely nothing but walking straight home (which of course, had he done, he would have been inside long before GZ could have gotten involved).
          2) GZ followed TM only because he was black.
          3) The police ordered GZ to "stand down" on the telephone, but he defied them because he was a vigilante cop wannabe.

          If that's what you know, of course this seems like an outrage. But why haven't any of these people seen that the testimony refutes all three of these? These beliefs are often proclaimed by otherwise credible individuals. Do they just not want to know? Or do they know, but prefer to continue the mythology since the truth will interfere with that?

          1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

            The scene that they cobble together from nothing but conjecture, that Zimmerman was prowling the neighborhood in the hopes of a black guy snooping around, and stalking Martin with the express intent of shooting a black man is beyond hilarious.

            The caricature they've assembled as their image of what happened is no better than those of The Devil's Weed.

            This case has really made the left go batshit crazy.

            Zimmerman was stupid, but definitely not criminal, and there doesn't seem to be any evidence that he was racist either.

            1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

              Was the stupid part failing to anticipate that he would be jumped? I don't think Martin's supporters would exactly help their case if that's what they go with.

            2. Warrren   12 years ago

              Stupid? I'm in the Zimmerman did not hing wrong (or stupid) camp. Just don't see it.

              1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                I'd say the evidence we know about that's at all credible indicates that Zimmerman fired in self-defense. Possibly that wasn't necessary, but there's nothing factual that really says otherwise.

                Whether Zimmerman did something to initiate the use of force is still pretty muddy. Yes, whatshername said Martin threw the first punch, but that's speculation, unless Martin said he was doing that. We'll never know for sure.

                I think the Zimmerman account is plausible enough, especially given that nothing even dented it in court, but that doesn't mean it has to be true, either.

                1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

                  Even if we stipulate that Zimmerman's account is the way it happened second by second, he's still stupid. He called the cops. He had no need to get out of his car and follow Martin. It isn't criminal, but it's stupid.

                  He was definitely overzealous in his duties as part of the neighborhood watch.

                  I absolutely buy the idea that he was a cop wannabe. But none of that should be taken that he didn't shoot Martin in self defense, or that he was some racist roaming the hood in the hopes of finding just the right black guy to shoot in cold blood.

                  1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                    I agree, why confront the kid or even approach him? Totally unnecessary and maybe even dangerous. Despite being armed, Zimmerman had no way of knowing Martin wasn't.

                    All that said, doesn't change the correctness of the result, and I still tend to think (but I don't know or even feel close to certain) that Martin likely took things too far and used force when he shouldn't have.

                    Frankly, I think this was a perfect storm of dumb decisions that sadly resulted in a person's death. Martin sounds like he had his issues, but he probably would've outgrown them. And Zimmerman hasn't been gunning down people, either. Little different facts, and they both probably would've gone off and lived ordinary lives.

      2. Invisible Finger   12 years ago

        Obama never had any credibility to begin with, and it got him the seat of power.

        Credibility never mattered.

    4. Outlaw   12 years ago

      Proglodytes want to be able to violently attack people who look at them crossways.

      1. Damned Fool   12 years ago

        Go kill yourself!

        - tumblr SJW

        1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

          I got lots of joy one afternoon reading a tumblr dedicated to making fun of SJWs tumblrs. Can't remember what it was called though.

          1. Irish   12 years ago

            Was it WTF Social Justice?

            1. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

              Ahahahahah

              are you like totally down to be with some DUMPY ASS SHIT person if they have the "right" genitals groomed in the "right" way over some SUPER HOT trans* person or?.?????????

              1. PH2050   12 years ago

                "cisheteropatriarchy"

                What is this I don't even

          2. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

            Oh Social Justice, You So Crazy!

            Great site, often laugh-out-loud.

            1. Irish   12 years ago

              The patriarchy told me my opinion is invalid unless it's "logical" (as defined by the patriarchy).

              HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!

              1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

                I think it was this one.

                I would like to know what percentage of successful women would identify with the Jezebels/Marcottes/SJWs of the world. Not many, I suspect.

                I also bet the advice the successful women of the world would give to those types would be "get over yourself, quit bitching and do something with your life."

                1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

                  This describes my wife's attitude quite well.

                2. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  I've worked with quite a number, and they don't usually go that far, even if they lean left.

    5. Warty   12 years ago

      Amanda, sweetie, let me come over and put you in the mount. Try to "push me off". See how well that works. Now let me punch you and see how well you do.

      1. ant1sthenes   12 years ago

        Please upload video to Youtube.

  32. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    the specific gender roles taught in many abstinence-only courses violate the students' right to equal protection.

    "We call the one with the 'penis' a BOY. Everyone, repeat after me: BOY. Very good."

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      HOW DARE YOU!

  33. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    I really want someone to sucker punch Amanda Marcotte

    Don't forget to upload it to smackcam.

  34. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    Let's not forget that for every retarded Marcotte posting, there exists a Yglesias post of equal or greater idiocy:

    Detroit is everything that conservatives hate?labor unions, black people, pensions?so in some quarters there's almost a kind of glee around this idea that Detroit is a preview of the American future. But it's total nonsense.

    It is undoubtedly true that many American municipalities will have to end up paying less in pension and health benefits to retired public sector workers than has been promised in the past. And it is at least possible that some of these cities will avail themselves of bankruptcy to do so. But what's disturbing about Detroit's fate is obviously not the specific details of municipal finance, it's the decline of a city. It's the poor state of its public infrastructure and its building stock. It's the high crime and falling population. It's the poverty and lack of jobs.

    Conservatives hate pensions? That's news to this conservative. Also, evidently Detroit was just a ROAD away from unrivalled prosperity -- if Matty says so, it must be true.

    1. Zakalwe   12 years ago

      Let's not forget

      Why not?

      But yes, he does have the cause and effect relationship of any infrastructure deficiencies reversed.

    2. All-Seeing Monocle   12 years ago

      Obviously the question is how those darned conservatives caused all that high crime and falling population. Austerity?

    3. Irish   12 years ago

      Detroit is everything that conservatives hate?labor unions, black people, pensions?so in some quarters there's almost a kind of glee around this idea that Detroit is a preview of the American future.

      Brainless accusation of racism? Check.

      It's the poor state of its public infrastructure and its building stock. It's the high crime and falling population. It's the poverty and lack of jobs.

      I like that liberals never bother explaining WHY there are few jobs, rampant poverty, and high crime. These things apparently just happened, through no fault of the people running the city.

      1. Warrren   12 years ago

        Plans were made!

      2. Gozer the Gozerian   12 years ago

        I wish this were true, but unfortunately "liberals" do bother explaining why there are few jobs, rampant poverty, and high crime: CAPITALISM!

        1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          Don't you mean CRAPITALISM or KKKAPITALISM? Has to look punchy on a placard next to the giant paper mache replica of Bush's head, dont'cha know.

          1. Gozer the Gozerian   12 years ago

            No swastika?!?

            1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

              Swastikas cost extra when you want to go get a poster printed at Office Depot.

              Don't ask me how I know this.

              1. PH2050   12 years ago

                Not for me.

                I've got a guy.

    4. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

      I'm really getting quite frustrated with people blaming so many things on "poverty" in the USA. You would think that millions of people are sleeping in cardboard boxes, looking like living skeletons, drinking water from potholes in our decrepit streets.

      Of course, what we call "poverty" in this country would be considered incredible luxury in much of the third world, where there is true poverty. Poor people here usually live in climate-controlled homes with computers, cable HD TVs, cars, on and on. How exactly is that "poverty"? And the poor also get food stamps, Medicaid, and many other things on top of that. No one in this country has to live outside or starve unless they reject what is available.

      Shouldn't there be a definition of poverty that isn't just some arbitrary income level that the feds have decided is where poor begins? Yes, I know that without that dividing line, we wouldn't be able to decide who gets all the FREE STUFF but can't we come up with a new name for that line, such a "subsidy-eligible"? It's actually quite embarrassing to talk to people from other countries, who really believe that there is a ruling class in the US with all the money, but that all other people here are destitute.

      1. Gozer the Gozerian   12 years ago

        I understand that you are ranting, but I feel obligated to answer your question: "Absolute poverty."

        1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

          I appreciate those definitions. It would be nice if there were separate words for each situation, and not the same word with a modifier, but I don't want to go off on a rant here......

      2. Nazdrakke   12 years ago

        Truly. Consider the national hand-wringing over the fact that our poor people are too fat.

  35. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    Truly, a more airtight analysis of the economy cannot be had!

    Last week I recommended that companies with lots of "cash on the sidelines" should consider paying their workers more. But if you're an executive with a principled opposition to handing out raises, Amazon definitely shows you the way to go. They are quite stingy with their workers, but it's all in pursuit of growing sales and advancing customers' interests. Profts, dividends, and such don't enter into the picture. They just want to grow and strike terror into the hearts of lesser businessmen.

    It's good of Matty to start his sentences with "last week I recommended", a sure sign to the devoted reader that what follows will be pure undiluted insanity. If he would only start his sentences with STUPID IDEA TO FOLLOW in 32 point font, he'd really be doing the rest of his readership a favor.

    1. All-Seeing Monocle   12 years ago

      Maybe it could just be a banner at the top of the site?

    2. Zakalwe   12 years ago

      1-2 days before it leaked that Obama wanted to nominate Summers for Fed Chairman Matty wrote a post about how it was completely, 100% obvious that Janet Yellen would be nominated.

    3. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

      Executives have a principled opposition to handing out raises? What?

      1. Gozer the Gozerian   12 years ago

        The world is a zero-sum game, they are all Gordon Gecko incarnate, KORPORASHUNS!, blah blah blah...

    4. Warrren   12 years ago

      Wow. He stumbled on to a point there. It's not about pleasing the workers it's about pleasing the customers and grabbing share.

      You pay the workers what you need to to maximize their productivity, anything more is a waste.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        Maximizing shareholder equity. That's what it's mostly about for public companies. That and maximizing management compensation.

        1. BiMonSciFiCon   12 years ago

          I am sure investors would just love it if companies starting paying their workers more without good reason (i.e., competitive pressure). The market wouldn't react negatively at all. I would love to see the business section of a 10-K or a proxy statement explaining that to investors.

          "In the last fiscal year, cash on hand increased to $XXX. Although we had plenty of cash to finance acquisitions or internal investments, we did not believe any individual project was sufficiently attractive at the time. However, we read this awesome blog post by Matt Yglesias, telling us to pay our employees more. No, our wages were not below market, and there wasn't much chance of them going anywhere, but we wanted to help jumpstart the American economy."

          Investors would just love that.

    5. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      Jesus, that's moronic on several levels. Doesn't understand how public companies work, let's his apparent like of Amazon cloud what they're in business for, thinks companies just sit on money for fun.

      Amazing this guy is paid for these opinions.

    6. CE   12 years ago

      A "principled opposition to handing out raises"?????

      How about a fiduciary duty to the shareholders to not pay more than necessary to get good employees?

  36. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

    Reason TV Wiki entry

    1. Warrren   12 years ago

      Awesome. I'm sure when the history of the world is sung by the Great Bard you'll get a stanza all to yourself.

    2. Apatheist ?_??   12 years ago

      Why?

      1. Warrren   12 years ago

        What?

        1. Longtorso, Johnny   12 years ago

          Someone else reverted it. We're in the middle of a Reason Wiki page editing war. Men! To the barricades!!

          1. Warrren   12 years ago

            Who the hell is spending their time watching over such an obscure part of the Wikipedoia?

            1. Generic Stranger   12 years ago

              It was an IP editor (a non-registered editor). I have a suspicion it was someone here trolling Longtorso.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Independence Day Reminds Us You Can Be American by Choice

Billy Binion | 7.4.2025 6:30 AM

Brickbat: Friends in High Places

Charles Oliver | 7.4.2025 4:00 AM

The Fourth of July Is a Celebration of Freedom—From Government

John Stossel | 7.4.2025 12:01 AM

A Broad Ruling Against Trump's Immigration Policies Illustrates Alternatives to Universal Injunctions

Jacob Sullum | 7.3.2025 4:40 PM

Environmental Regulations Are Literally Baking Europeans to Death

Jack Nicastro | 7.3.2025 3:38 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!