Friday Funnies: Royal Pain

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Bok has Feeney's back.
He's right. Our spending blows.
Perhaps he was suggesting Americans are performing some sort of fellatio on their royalty
Indeed, see; press, Kennedy family.
Actually, it's a condition for working at MSNBC.
Notice has been given to America. Prince George is wearing Bart Simpson's scalp.
We've started wars with royal George's for less.
And they no less the same - ie. The War of Jenkin's Ear.
To be fair, that damn ear had it coming.
Mark Antony was smart enough to ask for the loan of an ear.
Cowabunga, dude!
OH SNAP
Sweet!
http://www.foxnews.com/politic.....z2a9TCCgMY
What difference, at this point, does it make?
Once again the Republicans continue their "War on Women" who just want to help the US government by taking advantage of the revolving door between government and crony industry which has made some people lots of money.
Why did I go into state instead of Federal service? I can't even break six figures without becoming a division leader.
/sigh
Seems like a lot of money, but as Hillary's "Lady of the Bedchamber" you either talked to Huma or felt the wrath of the Queen. So I'm sure she was worth every penny they paid her, and more.
-1 bubble.
Oh, let me be the first.... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Needs more labels. Specifically the kind that only appears when you hover your mouse over the picture.
Hear hear...We strongly agree with you!
Why is Krang wearing a crown?
Because all the libertarians at TReason voted for Kodos.
I thought krang was from TMNT
SugarFree is an uneducated prole who things Kang and Krang are the same thing.
Kraang may be from TMNT, I'm not sure who this "Krang" character is.
I was merely making a joke and Cdr's spelling might have just been a typo, but you two--for not knowing the right spelling before correcting me--have made utter fools of yourselves. Shame to you both. SHAME!
I'm sorry sir. I will adjourn to my flogging chamber to punish myself.
http://turtlepedia.wikia.com/wiki/Krang
I don't think so SF.
SHREDDERRRRR!!!
In Soviet America, royalty pays politicians.
http://www.latimes.com/news/na.....8464.story
"Defenders of political appointments argue that the ambassador's job has been diminished by modern communications that make it easy for presidents to stay in touch with foreign leaders."
Hard to debate that kind of logic.
Labels, hell. Most people would need a footnote to understand what the man's saying.
OT: The Squirrels are no longer content to eat posts - Now they bring the Black Death to California: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23460709
FEAR IT!
Ease up, Chip. *Everyone* puts on a few extra pounds during pregnancy.
*takes on*, dammit!
Related: Oversized royal babies take over London
The British collectively are the equivalent of the "Trayvon was murdered" crusade.
If they were here, dumbass americans would be talking about them instead of teaching capitalism.
Just look at great Britain at any time since the early 1900s and you have a blue print of what the US will look like at 20 years from that point in history.
As impossible as it should be, our royalty is a lot uglier, too. Just ask Amanda Bynes.
This one was actually pretty good. B+